Upload
marsha-dennis
View
218
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Freshwater Mussels in the Lower Flint River Basin: Recent and Historical Trends
1) Why should we care?
2) Status of Freshwater Mussels in the ACF
3) Where are we now?
Overview
Why Should We Care about Freshwater Mussels?
• Economic importance (historical)• Water purification• Some species indicators of stream health• Improve fisheries
Thar beMussels !
Mussels are FilterFeeders
3 to 6 gal per day per individual
Freshwater Mussel Beds
100 mussels = 0.001 cfs(this image contains 247)
Freshwater Mussel Beds are Foraging Sites
Per
cent
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Mussels Snails Crayfish Amphibians Fishes
Imperiled North American FreshwaterAnimal Species
Imperiled = Threatened or endangered throughout their historical range.
Neves et al. 1997. Status of aquatic mollusks in the southeaastern US: a downward spiral of diversity. In George W. Benx and David E. Collins editors. Aquatic Fauna in Peril: the Southeastern Perspective. Lenz Design and Communications, Decatur, GA. 554 pp.
Southeastern Mussel Diversity
Lower Flint River and Tributaries
Status of Mussels in the lower Flint River Basin
MusselsFat three-ridge (E)Chipola slabshell (T)Purple bankclimber (T)Shiny-rayed pocketbook (E)Gulf moccasinshell(E)Oval pigtoe (E)
FishGulf sturgeon (T)
Most (remaining) habitat is in the Flint and Apalachicola.
Critical Habitat for the ACF
Flint River Mussel Studies 1950’sW.J. Clench and R.D. Turner
Number of Species
0 10 20 30 40
Total Species Endemic Species
Suwannee
Ochlockonee
Apalachicola
Choctawhatchee
Escambia
River Basin
- Recognized high diversity of the ACF River Basin- Summarized localities of type specimens- Noted declines in the Chattahoochee river
Flint River Mussel Studies 1991-1992 J. Brim Box and J.D. Williams
- 134 sites sampled- 22 species observed
- Kinchafoonee, Muckalee, and Chickasawhatchee Creeks had very high mussel richness (9-16 species)
- Very few mussels observed in the Chattahoochee Basin
1991-1992 sites
Surveying historic mussel populations
Examining responses to drought
Flint River MusselFlint River MusselStudies 1999-2001Studies 1999-2001
Jones Research CenterJones Research Center
1999 Mussel Survey
- 46 sites on 12 tributaries
-Visual and tactile search for mussels
- 100 m sampling areas
1999 Mussel Survey Results
- 14,873 mussels- 19 species - 3 endangered species
Shiny-rayedPocketbook
GulfMoccasinshell
Oval pigtoe
1999 Mussel Survey Conclusions
- Abundant mussel populations still occur
- Endangered species are not abundant
- Tributary streams continue to support the greatest richness and abundance
Muckalee
Kinchafoonee
Chickasawhatchee
Mussel Response to Drought 2000
Prior drought studies:- ?- ?
Summer 2000 Drought Severity
Dewatered stream
Anoxic stream
Results of the 2000 Drought Study
- stagnation accelerated mussel mortality
D.O. < 5 mg/Lvelocity < 0.1 m/sec
- mid-reaches of tributaries were most affected
- drought tolerance varies by species
2001 Mussel Resurvey
Objectives:
1) Determine the extent of regional changes in mussel assemblages due to the drought
2) Determine stream reaches likely to be adversely affected by drought
Site Selection
Criteria for Selection
- 20 sites surveyed
- Previously surveyed in 1999
- Previously supported diverse or abundant mussel populations
- Represent a range of stream size
Muckalee Ck
Kinchafoonee Ck
Chickasawhatchee Ck
Spring Ck
Results
Hydrologic and Geologic Classification
Fall Line Hills
Dougherty Plain
Fall Line Hills
Muckalee Ck
Kinchafoonee Ck
Chickasawhatchee Ck
Spring Ck
Mussel Abundance
Hydrologic Condition 2000
Per
cent
Cha
nge
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
Flowing Stagnant or Dry
Changes in Mussel Abundance
1999 to 2001
Muckalee Ck
Kinchafoonee Ck
Chickasawhatchee Ck
Spring Ck
Conclusions
- Lower Flint tributaries were most sensitive to drying
- Freshwater mussels appear to require fresh water
-Greatest declines in mid-reaches of Flint tributaries (Dougherty Plain)
-Endangered, Threatened and Special Concern species still occur but are not abundant
- The best populations of mussels occur in the upper reaches of Kinchafoonee, Muckalee, and Chickasawhatchee Creeks
- Can these populations survive?
- Will other areas recover?
Future Outlook ?
Where are we now?Palmer Drought Index
1999 2010Year entering
“drought”Current
< -2< -2.5
Where are we now?Stream Flow
1999 2010
1000 cfs
1000 cfs
Year entering“drought”
Current
Where have we been?
Severe droughts
1953-1957
J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J
Pal
mer
Dro
ught
Sev
erity
Inde
x
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
1998-2002
J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J
Pal
mer
Dro
ught
Sev
erity
Inde
x
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
1953 1954 1955 1956 1957
Where have we been?Comparison of historical droughts
1953-1954 1999-2000
Where have we been?
Flint River at AlbanyComparison of 1954 and 2000 drought flows(p=0.20)
Interval
1954-1955 1999-2000
Ave
rage
Mon
thly
Flo
w (
CF
S)
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
~ 3100~ 2500
Comparison of Drought Flows
Flint River at AlbanyComparison of 1954 and 2000 drought flows
Month
J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S
Ave
rage
Mon
thly
Flo
w (
CF
S)
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
1954-1955 1999-2000
Comparison of Drought Flows
Flint River at Albany
Month
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Med
ian
Mon
thly
Flo
w (
CF
S)
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
1939-1974 1975-2009
Historic Stream Flows
Conclusions – Lower FRB
- Current conditions appear comparable to those entering the “2000” drought
- 1954 drought more severe than 2000
- Lowest flows of record occurred during 2000
- Multi-year droughts cause progressively lower growing season flows (even following recharge)
- Stream flows are declining and may be reaching or exceeding critical levels during extended droughts.
“If the biota, in the course of eons, have built something we like but do not understand, then who but a fool would discard seemingly useless parts? To keep every cog and wheel is the sign of an intelligent tinkerer.”
Aldo Leopold
Acknowledgements
Funding – R.W. Woodruff Foundation, J.W. Jones Center, Georgia EPD, and The Nature Conservancy
Field Assistance – R. Bambarger, M. Bell, B. Clayton, A. Liner, S. Kelly, L Bledsoe
Appendix Follows
Mussel Evolution and Life History
Freshwater Mussel Lure
Shiny-rayed Pocketbookminnow lure
Southern Pocketbook Lure
Fluted Kidney Shell Lure
Blackfly or midgeimitation
Freshwater Mussel Lures
- fish mistake lures for prey
- biting the lure releases glochidia
- glochidia infect gills or surfaces of the oral cavity
Historical Threats to Mussels
Pearl button industry
Pearl farming
Channel dredging
Historical Threats to Mussels
Non-point source pollution
Point source pollution
Reservoir construction
Historical Threats to Mussels
Zebra Mussels and distribution
Asiatic Clam
Endangered Species Act of 1973
“The Secretary shall, concurrently with a determination… that a species is an endangered species or a threatened species, designate any habitat of such species which is then considered to be critical habitat…” (ESA Section 4(a)(3)(A))
Critical Habitat Includes…
• Specific areas within or outside the geographical area occupied by the species when listed, on which are found those physical or biological features essential to the conservation of the species.
• Except in special circumstances, critical habitat does not include the entire geographical area which could be occupied by the species. (Paraphrased from: ESA Section 3(5)(A-C))
Critical habitat designations must be based on the best scientific information available, in an open public process, within specific time frames.
All federal agencies must ensure that any actions they authorize, fund, or carry out are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of a listed species, or destroy or adversely modify its designated critical habitat. A critical habitat designation does not set up a preserve or refuge, and applies only when federal funding, permits, or projects are involved. Critical habitat requirements do not apply to citizens engaged in activities on private land that do not involve a federal agency.
Implications of Critical Habitat Designation
2000 Drought Monitoring Study
- 9 sites stratified by stream size- 3-5 4 m2 quadrats per site- Weekly monitoring of
mussels depth bottom velocity DO
- Continuous temperature measurements
Status of Mussels 1999 to 2001Common Species
Elliptio complanata
Elliptio crassidens
Toxolasma paulus
Uniomerus carolinianusVillosa lienosa
Villosa vibex
1999 (#/site) 2001 (#/site)
Flowing 226 314 p=0.02
Non-Flowing 181 71 p=0.01
Status of Mussels 1999 to 2001Endangered Species
Shiny-rayed PocketbookSites 11/7
Total 131/56 Gulf MoccasinshellSites 2/1
Total 9/17
Oval PigtoeSites 5/6
Total 42/87
Status of Mussels 1999 to 2001Special Concern Species
Inflated SpikeSites 10/8
Total 99/161 Southern FatmucketSites 9/1
Total 20/8
Sculptured PigtoeSites 14/11
Total 360/543
Southern CreekmusselSites 4/5
Total 10/9
Downy RainbowSites 3/1
Total 31/1
Where are we now?U.S. Drought
1999 2010