Fred Lee evaluation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/4/2019 Fred Lee evaluation

    1/13

    ANNUAL SUPERINTENDENT EVALUATION2010DUVAL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS

    ____ September 2011 _Date

    (For use by School Board Members)Fred "Fel" Lee----- -----------Name of Board Member

    Scoring Instructions: Please evaluate the Superintendent's Performance by scoring each item. The following appraisalscale should be used:

    5 = Excellent Performance4 = Highly Effective3 = Acceptable (Average) Performance2 = Needs Improvement*1 = Unsatisfactory*

    *If you select 1 or 2, you must provide an explanation in the area provided.5 4 3 2 1

    Areas of Responsibility Excellent Highly Acceptable Needs UnsatisfactoryPerformance Effective Performance Improvement

    A. Relat ionships with the Board1. Keeps the Board informed on issues, needs, and ./operat ion of the school dist rict in a t imelv manner2. Offers professional advice to the Board on itemsrequiring Board action, with appropriate ./recommendations based on thorough study andanalysis3. Interprets and executes the intent of Board Policy ./4. Seeks and accepts construct ive crit ic ism of his/her ./work5. Suppor ts Board Policy and actions to the public ./and staff6. Has a harmonious working relationship wi th the ./Board7. Understands his/her role in the administration of ./Board Policy8. Remains impart ial toward Board Members, ./according all the same treatment9. Feels f ree to maintain his/her opposit ion to matters ./under discussion by the Board until an off ic ial decisionhas been reached

  • 8/4/2019 Fred Lee evaluation

    2/13

    General Comments (Relationships with the Board):Superintendent is highly effective with board relationships.

    Explanation for Ratings of 1 or 2:

    Item #7 - Superintendent must ins ist board members abide by appropr iate governance model to avoid micromanagement of operations.Item #9 " Requires stronger advocacy for his recommendations/ideas.

    5 4 3 2 1Areas of Responsibility Excellent Highly Acceptable Needs Unsatisfactory

    Performance Effective Performance ImprovementB. Community Relationships1. Sol icits input and gives at tent ion to problems and ./opinions of allgroups and indiv iduals2. Develops cordial and cooperat ive relat ionships with ./news media3. Participates act ively in community l ife and affairs ./4. Provides leadership for improving parental ./involvement in the schools5. Mainta ins a high visible profile in the schools and ./community6. Achieves status as a community leader in public ./education7. Gains respect and support of the community on the ./conduct of the school system8. Works collaborat ively with the Mayor, City Council . ./Sheriff , independent authori ties, and other keyorganizationsGeneral Comments (Community Relationships):Superintendent is highly effective with community relationships.

    Explanation for Ratings of 1 or 2:

    Item #6 - The organization has not developed and provided the leadership ro le for our community in educational advocacy under theSuperintendent's leadership.

  • 8/4/2019 Fred Lee evaluation

    3/13

    5 4 3 2 1Areas of Responsibility Excellent Highly Acceptable Needs Unsatisfactory

    Performance Effective Performance Improvementc. Staff and Organizational Relationships1. Develops and executes sound personnel ./procedures and practices2. Treats all personnel fai rly, wi thout favorit ism or ./discrimination, while insisting on performance of duties3. Delegates authority to staff members appropriate to ./the posi tion each holds4. Recruits and assigns the best avai lable personnel ./in terms of their competenciesGeneral Comments (Staff and Organizational Relationships):Superintendent needs improvement in the area of staff and organizational relationships.

    Explanation for Ratings of 1 or 2:Item # 2 - Stronger emphasis on linking organizational goals to leadership accountabil ity by Superintendent required.I tem #3 - Superintendent needs to rely and trust his staf f to complete their roles within the organizat ion whi le holding each highly accountable.I tem #4 - Requires a stronger urgency toward removing, recrui ting and placement of key management posit ions wi th highly quali fied staff .

  • 8/4/2019 Fred Lee evaluation

    4/13

    5 4 3 2 1Areas of Responsibility Excellent Highly Acceptable Needs Unsatisfactory

    Performance Effective Performance ImprovementD. Educational Leadership1. Understands and keeps informed regarding all "spects of the instructional program2. Implements the school system's philosophy of "ducation; sets goals of achievement3. Develops and maintains a proactive agenda for "chool improvement that is oriented toward highperformance for all students4. Examines, communicates, and addresses gaps in "chievement of dif ferent groups of students'5. Art iculates his /her high educational vision and "otivates staff, parents, s tudents, and community toparticipate in achieving it6. Organizes a planned program of staff development "nd improvementGeneral Comments (Educational Leadership):Educational Leadership of the district is acceptable.

    Explanation for Ratings of 1 or 2:Item #4 - Linking internal and external educational programs to student learning gains requires improvement. Inabi li ty to achieve district 's targetsrequires attention.Item #5 - Communicating DCPS vision to community requi res a stronger focus.

  • 8/4/2019 Fred Lee evaluation

    5/13

    5 4 3 2 1Areas of Responsibility Excellent Highly Acceptable Needs UnsatisfactoryPeliormance Effective Performance ImprovementE. Fiscal Leadership1. Preparat ion of the annual budget reveals careful .;'analysis of the operational expenditures of the schoolsystem2. Has process for guiding budget .;'3. Aligns budget with Strategic Plan .;'4. Establishes both a short-term and long-range .;'capital improvement plan which includes continuousassessment of the projected resources and ut ility of allschool buildings and property5. Maintains accurate f inancial records and .;'implements internal/external audit systems andcontrols to ensure the proper expenditure of funds andelimination of waste6. Secures goods and services at a fair and .;'reasonable cost, implementing cost-saving measures,without compromising the quality of the instructionalprogram7. Communicates the current and projected f iscal .;'needs of the school system to the School Board8. Consults with the Board on unusual needs and .;'expenditures9. Reports to the School Board on the financial .;'condition of the school system in a timely manner asdefined by the BoardGeneral Comments (Fiscal Leadership):Superintendent should seek community assistance in creating a more financial transparent organization. Fiscal Leadership of the district isacceptable.

    Explanat ion for Ratings of 1 or 2:

    Item # 1 - Resolving the district reoccurring costs wil l require the highest attention of the Superintendent.Item # 2 - Budget process requires stronger priority alignment and pol icy consensus with board prior to budget decisions.

  • 8/4/2019 Fred Lee evaluation

    6/13

    5 4 3 2 1Areas of Responsibility Excellent Highly Acceptable Needs Unsatisfactory

    Performance Effective Perlormance ImprovementF . Personal Qualities1. Exerc ises sound judgment in arr iv ing at decis ions -/2. Maintains poise and emotional stabil ity in the ful l -/range of his/her professional activities3. Uses language effectively in dealing with staff, the -/Board, and the public4. Writes clearly and concisely -/5. Speaks well in front of small and large groups, -/expressing his /her ideas in a logical and forthrightmanner6. Maintains professional development by reading, -/tak ing courses, attending conferences, working onprofessional committees, and visiting other schooldistricts7. Demonstrates his/her abil ity to work well wi th -/individuals and qroups8. Defends principle and conviction in the face of -/pressure and partisan influence9. Mainta ins high standards of ethics, honesty, and -/integrity10. Earns respect and standing among his/her -/professional colleagues11. Devotes his/her time and energy effective ly to ./his/her job

    General Comments (Personal Qualities):

    The Superintendent is above reproach in the area personal quali ties.

    Explanation for Ratings of 1 or 2:Item #8 - Superintendent must insist on a stronger board governance ro le to avoid board micromanagement of daily operations.

  • 8/4/2019 Fred Lee evaluation

    7/13

    5 4 3 2 1Areas of Responsibility Excellent Highly Acceptable Needs Unsatisfactory

    Performance Effective Performance ImprovementG. Please give an overall rating of the v"Superintendent's PerformanceGeneral Comments (Overall Performance):Ed is passionate about public education, knowledgeable, a man of integrity and hardworking. He is proficient in many of the valued work behaviorsdef ined as requirements for the DCPS Superintendent posi tion. Needs improvement in achieving the goals and targets mutually agreed upon bythe Board and Superintendent as defined in district 's strategiC plan.

    Explanation for Ratings of 1 or 2:Consistently meeting all objectives (see attachment) and occasional ly exceeding them defines the expectations we expect from all DCPSemployees.

    08/17/10-sse

  • 8/4/2019 Fred Lee evaluation

    8/13

    ; >.>

    Q5\ . r .

    ~o- + - -

    ttl: : s :+

    .'. .

  • 8/4/2019 Fred Lee evaluation

    9/13

    0:l n-o~ '"? ~, e ;.,. ,~""0'6 - -0~ :t> src ::lc, '!" rng "Q.~ l" ~N0 -c. . . . . . IT>. . . . ~~c 0e ;.n .. .09 _ .. .'":r.: 0-~ a'"a .

  • 8/4/2019 Fred Lee evaluation

    10/13

    '" '" ~ n~n ~ CT ~ 0 ::J'" 0 3 00.. '" n -a -0 -c'" ~ ~ ::r II> : : r - IO n~ c " '" ~ '";;: 0 ;;; ~~ 5' " * ;;;m II> n 0

  • 8/4/2019 Fred Lee evaluation

    11/13

    . . w;; : 00;;:v. . . . rn:E 5' !!!s : ~ '"~ 0n.:J ~ =;- -n.. , In~ q'"~ OJ" ro

    '" ""o"g : );0 iii:J; C~ m, ::>~ Na,f : . J e..J N0 -

  • 8/4/2019 Fred Lee evaluation

    12/13

    Gl0c:~ < . .0 :IO J 2" n~ ~ -n "[ :; -c0- S' 01'"" ::> ~r 5'0 "" a.0 3'. . . 0n"0In. . . . .,~It>" ""0l> iii'c :I'!" '""C.r- g,'"0 -c. . . . . . .. . . . . 2i0~'"0. .~zr-z : : r0. .,c.

  • 8/4/2019 Fred Lee evaluation

    13/13

    0L-c"' -()c.: ; ; : 07!~:;':r:0'"

    '" 0"e. S'"'" . .3 ~.i'!3 " . . ~"C O J "". a. ::IS 3 I = . .. "~ ;? []"" " I:)J 0 ![ n3" ::> '"Cr: a."C . . In'" :r ~::J" '": ::I. '!" tTQ N ::Ia.2 .!" S o'"J ...:,_ . III,_ . ~-,'" 0~ :;.OJCl

    a-" OJ2. '"re: CT"~ 0"' OJ~ a .