15
Lessons from : Fraunhofer Institute for Production Systems and Design Technology About: Benchmarking for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises

Fraunhofer Institute_benchmarking-2006

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Fraunhofer Institute_benchmarking-2006

Lessons from:Fraunhofer Institute for Production Systems and

Design Technology

About:Benchmarking for Small

and Medium-Sized Enterprises

Page 2: Fraunhofer Institute_benchmarking-2006

Goals

• A holistic view on quality becomes increasingly important for SME’s.

• Product and enterprise evaluations have shown that quality and productivity are not necessarily contradicting enterprise goals.

• Experienced SME’s already know that competition is not only reflected in product comparison.

• Increasingly competitive capacity is financially influenced by process aspects.

Page 3: Fraunhofer Institute_benchmarking-2006

Goals (cont.

• Optimising products or parts of the work process is no longer sufficient, the consideration and analysis of the whole enterprise is required.

• The benchmarking method integrates existing management methods to achieve the preset goal through continuous implementation of the BenchmarkIndex.

Page 4: Fraunhofer Institute_benchmarking-2006

Procedure• The benchmark method for SME’s is based on a

branch-intern database key figure comparison.• The key figure comparison is based on a

databank, which was built in the UK in 1996, and currently comprises 15 000 enterprises.

• The database allows a national as well as international comparison of enterprises (beyond Europe).

• Financial key figures, management key figures and business excellence figures are part of the comparison.

Page 5: Fraunhofer Institute_benchmarking-2006

Procedure (cont• The companies enter relevant key figures into a

questionnaire and send them to the Information Centre Benchmarking.

• The validated key figures are then put anonymously into an online database.

• Subsequently the companies for the comparison are selected from the database according to benchmark criteria:– Turnover/year– Number of employees, and– SIC -code

Page 6: Fraunhofer Institute_benchmarking-2006

Procedure (cont

• In a short period of time a report of enterprises’ strength and weakness profile is being generated.

• The report include classical key figures on profitability, finance and growth rate as well as key figures on supplier, customer satisfaction and employee satisfaction.

Page 7: Fraunhofer Institute_benchmarking-2006

Procedure (cont• Drawn from the results of the report, the

interpretation of relevant strengths and open potential in each compared area is discussed with the company.

• The benchmarking results allow further conclusions on the evaluation of the company’s management practice.

• As the result of the discussion with the management, an action plan will be generated, through which the preset goals will be achieved.

Page 8: Fraunhofer Institute_benchmarking-2006

Procedure (cont

• After the implementation of the action plan, the BenchmarkIndex should be carried out anew in the next year as a control mechanism.

Page 9: Fraunhofer Institute_benchmarking-2006

5-Phases Concept of Benchmarking

REALISATION

COMPARISON

INTERN

AL

ANALYS

IS

CONCEPT

TARGETS

Page 10: Fraunhofer Institute_benchmarking-2006

Achievements and Experiences

• Our experiences in the application of our benchmarking method for SME’s has revealed that the need for benchmarking is urged by the demand to get or renew certain certifications.

• The first search for a better solution then initiates the motivation to execute a benchmarking project.

Page 11: Fraunhofer Institute_benchmarking-2006

Achievements and Experiences (cont

• Further motivation for implementing a benchmarking project for SME are the requirements for DIN ISO 9000:2000 / VDA 6.01 / QS 9000 certification, which demand benchmarking, i.e. continuous improvement process.

• On the other hand, many companies consider implementation of a benchmarking as a “pre-stage” of rating according to Base II (new requirements for credit rating systems for SME).

Page 12: Fraunhofer Institute_benchmarking-2006

Achievements and Experiences (cont

• This method offers a more comprehensive enterprise comparison option, through branch comparison and the comparison of key figures, which go beyond financial figures, e.g. management key figures.

Page 13: Fraunhofer Institute_benchmarking-2006

Our Offer for SME• There are opportunities for medium-sized enterprises to

implement a benchmarking comparison.• The offer is aimed at medium-sized enterprises in all

branches with a maximum of 500 employees and no more than 100 million Euro annual turnover.

• The service contains a comparison of financial and management data, as well as business excellence figures of the company within the branch.

• As a result, the enterprise receives a benchmarking report, in which relevant key figures are reflected and compared with other companies.

Page 14: Fraunhofer Institute_benchmarking-2006

Established Key Figure Areas• Profitability• Financial Management• Productivity• Investment• Growth• Customer Satisfaction• Innovation Management• Supplier Management• Personnel Management• Employee Satisfaction Evaluation• Business Excellence Key Figures

Page 15: Fraunhofer Institute_benchmarking-2006

END!