Upload
harding-potter
View
27
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
NCSA Session: Theory and Research on Item Response Demands: What Makes Items Difficult? Construct-Relevant? June 20, 2010 Detroit. Frameworks for Considering Item Response Demands and Item Difficulty Kristen Huff College Board Steve Ferrara CTB/McGraw-Hill. Thesis. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
NCSA Session: Theory and Research on Item Response
Demands: What Makes Items Difficult? Construct-
Relevant?June 20, 2010
Detroit
FRAMEWORKS FOR CONSIDERING ITEM RESPONSE DEMANDS
AND ITEM DIFFICULTY
KRISTEN HUFFCOLLEGE BOARD
STEVE FERRARACTB/MCGRAW-HILL
THESISA coherent and comprehensive understanding
of the interaction between items and examinees, and the controllable features of items that elicit predictable interactions is needed to:
Design items that do a better job of measuring what we’re interested in knowing
Design tests that are better suited to facilitate valid inferences about student performance
More generally, bridge the gap between large-scale assessment and teaching & learning
OBJECTIVETo conduct research (& review past research) that
informs the development of a framework, or conceptual structure, of item response demands.
Research questions:How much do existing item response demand
schemas cover current achievement constructs?
What are the features of items that influence item difficulty?
What student responses are triggered by different item features, and how do these responses influence item difficulty?
feature featurefeature feature
feature featurefeature feature
Reading comprehension# wordsreading leveloverlap between key and text
Mathnumber of variablesgraphicsfractions vs whole numbers
FRAMEWORK
FRAMEWORK
Intended cognitive complexity
Simple Complex
Observed item
difficulty
Easy“Good” item
(Good design and OTL)
Item design flaw or
Exceptionally effective instruction?
Or flawed assumptions? Or
restriction in range?
Hard Item design flaw
orNo OTL
“Good” itemor
No OTL
Opportunity to Learn
Taught Not Taught
Observed item
difficulty
Easy Effective Instruction Item design flaw
Hard
Item design flaw
orjust tough
stuff?
No OTL
CONCLUSIONS & POINTS OF DISCUSSION
Mapping the landscape of response demands, item features and the interaction between the two is messy, difficult work
Achieving “coherent and comprehensive” frameworks needs to be higher priority in research Start now using draft in operational testing
programs
Need more effective and easier ways to gauge opportunity to learn for many reasons, but also to inform the work we are recommending