Upload
nathan-hawkins
View
222
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Framework for U.S. Air Quality Framework for U.S. Air Quality Management and Decision-makingManagement and Decision-making
Judith C. Chow ([email protected])John G. Watson
Desert Research InstituteNevada System of Higher Education
Reno, NV, USA
Presented at:The Workshop on Air Quality Management, Measurement,
Modeling, and Health Effects
University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia24 May, 2007
ObjectivesObjectives
• Review Air Quality Management Framework
• Introduce NAAQS establishment process
• Discuss new PM NAAQS
• Specify timeline for implementation of standards
Framework for Air Quality Framework for Air Quality ManagementManagement
Air Quality Management Theory
MonitoringInventories Analysis & Modeling
Scientific ResearchScientific Research
Determine Emissions Reductions
Track and Evaluate Results
Implement and Enforce Strategies
Develop Programs to
achieve
Establish Goals
NAAQS
Attainment date Monitoring (air and emissions)Receptor modeling
Sources complyPermitsEnforcement
Allocate reductions to source categories. Develop Implementation Plans to achieve needed reductions. (SIPs)
For Figure 2
Air Quality Management Theory
MonitoringInventories Analysis & Modeling
Scientific ResearchScientific Research
Determine Emissions Reductions
Track and Evaluate Results
Implement and Enforce Strategies
Develop Programs to
achieve
Establish Goals
NAAQS
Attainment date Monitoring (air and emissions)Receptor modeling
Sources complyPermitsEnforcement
Allocate reductions to source categories. Develop Implementation Plans to achieve needed reductions. (SIPs)
For Figure 2 Bachmann, JAWMA, 2007
U.S. Federal Air Pollution U.S. Federal Air Pollution Control Legislation Control Legislation (1963-70)(1963-70)
• The Clean Air Act (CAA) of 1963– Develop and improve state/local air control
programs (US$65M)
• CAA Amendments of 1967– Maintain state/local air programs (US$55M)
• CAA Amendments of 1970– Established structure for air quality
management (U.S. EPA set NAAQS)– EPA to regulate stationary sources
Technology-based standards for new sourcesRisk-based standards for hazardous air pollutants
Comparison of U.S. Growth Comparison of U.S. Growth and Emissionsand Emissions
Year
Pe
rcen
t ch
an
ge
Basic Facts about U.S. National Ambient Basic Facts about U.S. National Ambient Air Quality Standards Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)(NAAQS)
• The Clean Air Act directs U.S. EPA to identify and set national standards for pollutants with adverse public health and environmental effects.
• The Clean Air Act also requires EPA to review each standard at least once every 5 years.
• US EPA established NAAQS for six criteria pollutants:
– ozone, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, lead, and particulate matter (PM)
Setting and Achieving the NAAQSSetting and Achieving the NAAQS• Setting the standards
– Health effects– Environmental effects
• Achieving the standards– Cost– Time needed to attain the standards
• Key parts of a standard:– Indicator (O3, PM2.5, etc.)– Level (e.g., 0.12 ppm, 150 µg/m3)
– Averaging time (e.g., 1 hour, 24 hours, annual)
– Form (e.g., one exceedance per year, never to be exceeded)
NAAQS Review/Revision ProcessNAAQS Review/Revision ProcessResearch on:
Atmospheric Processes,Air Quality, Exposure,Health and Welfare
Effects
Peer-ReviewedPublished Studies
EPA AirQualityCriteria
Document(AQCD)
EPA StaffPaper (SP)and Risk
Assessment(RA)
ResearchPlanning &
Coordination
Research NeedsIdentification
& Prioritization
Reviews byCASAC andthe public
PublicHearings andComment on
Proposals
FinalDecisions onStandards
ProposedDecisions onStandards
Reviews byCASAC andthe public
CASAC: Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee
Chronology of Photochemical Chronology of Photochemical Oxidant (as Ozone) NAAQSOxidant (as Ozone) NAAQS
Year of Promulgation
Level Averaging Time
Form
1971 0.08 ppm (primary = secondary)
Hourly Not to be exceeded more than once per year
1979 0.12 ppm (primary = secondary)
Hourly Not to be exceeded more than once per year
1997 0.08 ppm (primary = secondary)
8-hr average Three-year average of the annual fourth highest daily maximum 8-hr average
2007 (proposed) 0.06 ppm(primary)
8-hr average Proposed secondary to be below 0.8 ppm in the range of 0.06-0.07 ppm
Ozone NAAQS Attainment Ozone NAAQS Attainment TimelineTimeline
Date Process
July 18, 1997 US EPA promulgates ozone NAAQS
2000 US EPA designates non-attainment areas
2003 States submit Implementation Plans for meeting the eight-hour standard. For areas which haven’t met the current one-hour standard, ongoing efforts are sufficient through the current attainment dates
2012 States have up to 10 years to meet NAAQS plus two one-year extensions
Ozone NAAQS timeline for areas Ozone NAAQS timeline for areas classified as “transitional”classified as “transitional”
Date Process
July 18, 1997 US EPA promulgates ozone NAAQS
2000 States submit Implementation Plans to address transported air pollution. US EPA classifies areas as “transitional.” All new non-attainment areas are eligible to be “transitional.”
2004 States achieve reductions from regional sources
2007 States assess effectiveness of regional reductions
2012 States have up to 10 years to meet NAAQS plus two one-year extensions
Chronology of PM NAAQSChronology of PM NAAQSYear of Promulgation
Indicator Level
Annual 24-hr
1971 TSP (Total suspended particulate matter)
75 µg/m3 (geometric mean)
260 µg/m3 (primary; not to exceed >1/yr)
150 µg/m3
(secondary; not to exceed >1/yr)
1987 PM10 50 µg/m3 (arithmetic mean)
150 µg/m3 (not to exceed >1/yr, 3 years)
1997 PM10 50 µg/m3 (arithmetic mean)
150 µg/m3 (99th percentile averaged over 3 years)
PM2.5 15 µg/m3
(arithmetic mean)65 µg/m3 (98th percentile averaged over 3 years)
2006 PM2.5 15 µg/m3
(arithmetic mean)35 µg/m3 (98th percentile averaged over 3 years)
2006 PM10 None 150 µg/m3 (not to exceed >1/yr, 3 years)
2006 (proposed but rejected)
PM10-2.5 (PMcoarse) None 70 µg/m3 (99th percentile averaged over 3 years)
PMPM2.52.5 NAAQS Attainment NAAQS Attainment
TimelineTimelineDate ProcessJuly 18, 1997 US EPA Promulgates PM2.5 NAAQS
September 16, 1997 NAAQS become effective
July 1, 1998 States submit Monitoring Plans
1998 – 2000 Monitors put in place nationwide
1998 – 2003 Monitoring data collected
1999 US EPA designates areas as “unclassifiable”
2000 US EPA completes five-year scientific review of NAAQS
2002 US EPA reviews PM2.5 NAAQS
2002 – 2005 US EPA designates non-attainment areas
2005 – 2008 States submit Implementation Plans for meeting the NAAQS
2012 – 2017 States have up to 10 years to meet NAAQS plus two one-year extensions
Limitations of the U.S. PMLimitations of the U.S. PM2.52.5
StandardsStandards• Causal relationships of PM2.5 to health not established;
only epidemiological relationships• 24-hour average masks peak exposures of shorter
duration• Highest concentrations neglected or attenuated by
statistical form
• Already regulated as a subset of existing PM10 standard
• Is not accurately measured by practical Federal Reference Methods (FRMs) under all circumstances
• Other indicators are more specific to respiratory and cardiovascular effects
(several of these are due to available measurement technology)
Why use 98Why use 98thth Percentile for Percentile for 24-hr NAAQS?24-hr NAAQS?
• Statistical robustness
• Statistically significant associations with health effects:
– Mortality
– Hospital Admissions
– Respiratory symptomsFrequency (%)
PM
2.5
FR
M M
ass
(g/
m3)
PM2.5 FRM Mass versus Frequency (%)Site 117 - El Paso Tillman (ELPATI, 481410002)
2000 - 2002
0.01
99.99
0.05 0.5
99.5
1
99
5
95
10
90
20
80
30
70
40
60
50
50
60
40
70
30
80
20
90
10
95
5
99
1
99.9
0.1
1
2
3
5
7
10
20
30
50
70
100
2006 versus 1997 PM2006 versus 1997 PM2.52.5 NAAQS NAAQS
• Same levels for primary (health) and secondary (welfare) standards
• Minor changes in ambient monitoring
• More stringent spatial averaging requirements
• More relaxed data completeness requirements
• Simplification of reporting requirements
PMPM2.52.5 Federal Reference Federal Reference
Methods (FRMs)Methods (FRMs)
Andersen RAASThermo Fisher Scientific, formerly Andersen Instruments, Smyrna, GA
URG MASSURG Corp., Raleigh, NC
Partisol SamplerThermo Fisher Scientific, formerly Rupprecht & Patashnick, Albany, NY
BGI PQ-200 BGI, Inc., Waltham, MA
PMPM2.52.5 Monitoring Changes Monitoring Changes
• Samplers with very sharp cut cyclones (VSCC) would be FRM (had been FEM)
• Requires improved impactor oil for WINS
• Time limit to recover samples increased from 96 to 177 hours
• Allows up to 30 days* to condition and weigh retrieved filters when transit temperature is less than average ambient temperature during sampling
*In the past, the number of days was determined by: days=34-T[°C]; T=storage temperature <25 °C
Size-selective InletsSize-selective Inlets
WINS Impactor Very sharp cut cyclone (VSSC)
PMPM2.52.5 Spatial Averaging Spatial Averaging
ChangesChanges**
• Current
– Correlation (r) ≥0.6 between monitor pairs
– Difference ≤20% between monitor values
• Proposed
– Correlation (r) ≥0.9 between monitor pairs
– Difference ≤10% between monitors
* Determined on a seasonal basis
PMPM2.52.5 Data Completeness Changes Data Completeness Changes
• Required ≥75% data completeness per quarter
• Collocated sampler data can substitute for missing primary sampler data
• Allow 11 or more samples per quarter if calculated annual standard design value exceeds the NAAQS
• For a quarter with < 11 samples, allow data substitution of an historically low 24-hr value (to reach 11 samples) if the results yield an annual mean, spatially averaged annual mean, and/or annual standard design value exceeding the NAAQS
PMPM2.52.5 Data Reporting Changes Data Reporting Changes
• No longer need to report the following parameters to EPA’s Air Quality System (AQS; http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/)– Flow rate– Coefficient of Variance– Sample volume– Minimum & maximum temperature– Minimum & maximum pressure
• Continue to report:– PM2.5 concentration
– Average temperature– Average pressure
• State and local agencies need to retain information on parameters no longer reported to AQS
Why a Proposed PMWhy a Proposed PM10-2.510-2.5
Standard?Standard?• Court decision (D.C. Circuit in 1999 and 2001)
– PM10 composed of PM2.5
– Need to regulate coarse PM independent of PM2.5
• Recent studies showing PM10-2.5 effects*
– Inflammation and aggravation of allergic effects
– Coughs in children
– Increased hospital admissions
*Generally stronger for short-term rather than long term effects
Limitations to the PMLimitations to the PM10-2.510-2.5
StandardStandard
• Includes any ambient mix of PM10-2.5 dominated by resuspended dust from high density traffic on paved roads and PM generated by industrial sources
• Excludes any ambient mix of PM10-2.5 dominated by rural dust and soils and PM generated by agricultural and mining sources
– Agricultural sources, mining sources and other similar crustal PM10-2.5-dominated sources shall not be subject to control in meeting this standard
Concerns about Proposed Concerns about Proposed Revisions to PM StandardsRevisions to PM Standards
• Are levels set to provide an adequate margin of safety to protect sensitive populations, given the quality of the measurement and health effects data?
• Should a separate short-term standard for PM2.5 be established based on visibility concerns?
• Do measurement, characterization, and health-effects studies adequately support the cited differences in toxicity between rural and urban dust?
• Why not control agricultural, mining and other non-urban dust sources?
For More Information:For More Information:
See the June issue of the Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association
for the “Critical Review” by
John Bachmann
“Will the Circle be Unbroken: A History of the U.S. National Ambient Air
Quality Standards.”