Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Framework for risk-based O&M planning f ff h i d t bi
J h D l d S
for offshore wind turbines
John Dalsgaard SørensenAalborg University, Denmark
• Introduction• ReliabilityReliability• Operation & Maintenance• Bayesian NetworksBayesian Networks• Examples • Summary-ConclusionsSummary Conclusions
1
Introduction
Goal: minimize the total expected life-cycle costs → minimize COE
Initial costs: dependent on reliability levelInitial costs: dependent on reliability levelO&M costs: dependent on O&M strategy,
availability and reliabilityy yFailure costs: dependent on reliability
2
IntroductionExperience: Risk-Based Inspection Planning forFatigue in Offshore installationsFatigue in Offshore installations
3
Reliability modeling of wind turbinesy g
Analysis of failure probabilities based on different types of information:
- Observed failure rates –Classical reliability theory
Mechanical / electricalcomponentsy y
- Probabilistic models for failure probabilitiesfailure probabilities –Structural Reliability Theory:Limit state modeling & St t l tLimit state modeling & FORM / SORM / simulation
Structural components
4
Reliability modeling of wind turbinesy g
Structural members– Structural failure modes in
• Tower, main frame, blades, foundation, , ,– Limit state equation for failure modes to be formulated– Parameters modeled by stochastic variablesy
– Reliability estimated using Structural Reliability Methods
6
Reliability modelingy g
• Physical uncertainty Aleatory uncertaintyy y y y– Strength parameters: Yield strength of steel– Annual maximum wind speedp– Turbulence intensity
• Measurement uncertainty Epistemic uncertaintyMeasurement uncertainty Epistemic uncertainty– Wind measurement– Strain gaugeStrain gauge
• Statistical uncertainty Epistemic uncertainty– Limited number of dataLimited number of data
• Model uncertainty Epistemic uncertainty– Mathematical model as an approximation of failure mode
7
– Mathematical model as an approximation of failure mode
Reliability - System aspectsy y p
• Series / parallel system?• Damage tolerant design• Robustness
Robustness (system reliability) can be increased by• increased redundancyincreased redundancy
– mechanical load sharing– statistical parallel system effectsstatistical parallel system effects
• increased ductility • protecting the wind turbine to (unforeseen) incidents andprotecting the wind turbine to (unforeseen) incidents and
defects• good quality control in all phases
8
good quality control in all phases
Reliability level• Building codes: e.g. Eurocode EN1990:2002:
– annual PF = 10-6annual PF 10
• Fixed steel offshore structures: e.g. ISO 19902:2004– manned: annual PF ~ 3 10-5manned: annual PF 3 10– unmanned: annual PF ~ 5 10-4
• IEC 61400-1+3: wind turbines– annual PF ~ 10-4 - 10-3
• Observation of failure rates for wind turbines– Failure of blades: approx. 10-4 - 10-3 per yearFailure of blades: approx. 10 10 per year – Wind turbine collapse: approx. 10-5 - 10-4 per year
9
Operation & Maintenancep
How can risk-based methods be used to optimal planning of
• future inspections / monitoring (time / type)• decisions on maintenance/repair on basis of (unknown)decisions on maintenance/repair on basis of (unknown)
observations from future inspections / monitoring
taking into account uncertainty and costs?
10
Operation & Maintenancep
• High costs for operation and maintenance for offshore wind farmsHi h f il ?– Higher failure rates?
– Access: boat, helicopter, …– Weather windowsWeather windows– Loss of production– Mobilization
• Deterioration processes are always present • High uncertainty
→ Maintenance could optimally be planned by using risk-based methods
11
Operation & Maintenance
• Corrosion
p
• Corrosion
• Erosion
i• Fatigue
• Wear
• Etc.
Deterioration – damage accumulation:• Deterioration processes are connected with significant uncertainty• Observations of the actual deterioration / condition by monitoring or
inspections can be introduced in the models and significantly improve the precision of forecasts
12
p
Operation & Maintenance
• Corrective (unplanned):
p
– exchange / repair of failed components
• Preventive (planned):– Timetabled: inspections / service after predefined scheme – Conditioned: monitor condition of system and decide next on
inspection based on degree of deterioration→ based on pre-posterior Bayesian decision model
13
Operation & Maintenance
Theoretical basis – life-cycle approach: Bayesian decision theory – pre-posterior formulation
Optimal decision: Minimum total expected costs in lifetime
14
Optimal decision: Minimum total expected costs in lifetime
Operation & Maintenance
Mi i li bilit ( d th iti )Minimum reliability (codes, authorities ...), r
isk
Maintenance & repair costOptimal
strategy
Cos
t,
Expected failure cost
Increasing maintenance efforts
Maintenance effort
15
Decreasing risk (expected failure cost)
Operation & Maintenance
uii
FREPINd
Ni zz
dCdCdCdCdBd
,...,1, z s.t.
),,(),,(),,(),,(),,(),, W(max
li
I,,
ezezezezezezez
Expected benefits:LFt Tt PdtP ,...,2,1, ),,,( max ez
iT
N
iiFi r
TPBdB)1(
1)(1),,(1
ez
Expected inspection costs: iT
N
iiFiININ r
TPCdC)1(
1)(1),,(1
,
ez
Expected repair costs:
E pected fail re costs:
ii T
N
iRiRREP r
PCdC)1(
1),,(1
,
ez
TPPtCdC
L 1)()( ez
16
Expected failure costs: tFATCOLt
tFFFr
PPtCdC)1(
)(),,(1
,
ez
Operation & Maintenance
Failure / error types:• Gearbox• Generator• Rotor blades• Rotor blades• Blade pitch mechanism• Yaw mechanism• Main shaft• …• Tower / support structure (jacket): cracks, corrosion, …
17
Operation & Maintenance
Time scale for decisions:• Short: minutes
– Operation: ex: Stop wind turbines if price too low - Include uncertainty on wind forecasts and price development
• Medium: days– Maintenance: ex: Start maintenance / repair operation on
offshore wind turbine – Include uncertainty on weather windowswindows
• Long: months / yearsP ti i t– Preventive maintenance:
• Inspection- and monitoring planningG b t f ti k
18
– Gearboxes, generators, fatigue cracks, …
Operation & Maintenance
Information collection:• Condition Monitoring System (CMS)• SCADA data
• Inspections (direct information on defect / damage rate)p ( g )– Example: measurement of crack size in fatigue
• Indicators (indirect information on defect / damage rate)– Example: gearbox metallic particle monitoringExample: gearbox metallic particle monitoring
19
Example – gearbox
Examples of inspection methods and inspection results:• Visual inspection though inspection covers → indication of extent of wear• Oil analysis (time interval) → sample taken indicating extent of wear
M ( i i l) i l k i di i f• Magnet (time interval) → representative sample taken indicating extent of wear material
• Investigation of oil filters (time interval) → representative sample is taken g ( ) p pindicating extent of wear material
• Particle counting (online) → continuously representative samples are taken indicating extent of wear materialindicating extent of wear material
• Condition monitoring (continuously) → vibration response is monitored and used to indicate mechanical changes
→ Indirect information (indicators)
21
Example – gearbox
I ti Ob ti ( ) D i i i t b d b tiInspection Observation(s) Decision on maintenance based on observation plan - indicators ex: repair now / wait to next inspection
on damage
22
Operation & Maintenance
Application of Bayesian Networks
FC1 FC2
MU MU1 MU2
FC1 FC2
F1 F2
A1 A2
D0 D1
Ins
D2
Ins
1 2
Ins1
R1
Ins2
R2
RC1 RC2
23
Summary - Conclusions
• Risk-based methods can be used to optimal planning of f i i / i i ( i / )
y
– future inspections / monitoring (time / type)– decisions on maintenance/repair on basis of (unknown) observations
from future inspections / monitoringtaking into account uncertainty and costs
• Risk based operation & maintenance• Risk-based operation & maintenance– theoretical basis: pre-posterior decision theory
• Optimal decisions: maximize total expected benefits-costs
• Examples:Examples: – Inspection planning for fatigue cracks, corrosion,…– O&M for gearbox exposed to deterioration
24
Framework for risk-based O&M planning for offshore wind turbines
Thank You For Your AttentionThank You For Your Attention
John Dalsgaard SørensenProfessorAalborg University, [email protected]
25