Upload
madeline-shaw
View
218
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
FP6-2004-27020
April 21, 2023Autors: Ján hreňo, Marek Skokan,
Tomáš Sabol 1
Project Access-eGov
Ján Hreňo - Marek Skokan - Tomáš [email protected]
Access to e-Government Services Employing Semantic Technologies
April 21, 2023Autors: Ján hreňo, Marek Skokan, Tomáš
Sabol 2
Access-eGov – Basic facts
• Programme: FP6, IST • Project type: STREP• Project launch: January 2006• Duration: 38 months• Effort: 410 person-months• Overall budget: 2 279 243 EUR• EC Contribution: 1 983 000 EUR• Coordinator: Technical University Kosice, SK • Consortium: 11 partners, 5 countries
(Slovakia, Germany, Greece, Poland, Egypt)• Pilot applications: SK, PL, Germany, Egypt
April 21, 2023Autors: Ján hreňo, Marek Skokan, Tomáš
Sabol 3
Research Partners
User Partners
Coordinator
University of Regensburg
Germany
German University in CairoEgypt
InterSoft, a.s.Slovakia
EMAX S.A Poland e-ISOTIS
Greece
State Government of Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
City Hall of GliwicePoland
Municipality of Michalovce Slovakia
Cities on Internet AssociationPoland
Kosice Self-Governing RegionSlovakia
TU Kosice,
Slovakia
PROJECT PARTNERS
April 21, 2023Autors: Ján hreňo, Marek Skokan, Tomáš
Sabol 4
What is the Problem? (As-Is Situation)
• PAs providing services to citizens and businesses• Both “traditional” and “electronic” services – a
“hybrid” interaction of users with PAs• Usually only “atomic” (simple) services are
provided (without integration with other services)
• Users facing problems:• How to find the relevant service to their situation
(life-event)?• How to combine atomic services into (“higher-
level”) composed services (scenarios of services)?
April 21, 2023Autors: Ján hreňo, Marek Skokan, Tomáš
Sabol 5
As-Is situation
?
Access-eGov Objective
• To develop and validate a platform for composition of governmental
services into complex process definitions (life events) enabling
semantic interoperability of particular traditional and electronic
government services.
April 21, 2023Autors: Ján hreňo, Marek Skokan, Tomáš
Sabol 6
April 21, 2023Autors: Ján hreňo, Marek Skokan, Tomáš
Sabol 7
To-Be-Situation
• The user accesses Access-eGov site • He/she obtains information on service(s) relevant to his case• He/she understands the procedure (services in a structured
workflow) and knows which institution to contact, which forms to fill, and which documents to submit
• He/she receives support to execute the procedure (Personal assistant)
Research challenges
• Integration and interoperability of existing services
Solution: employment of Semantic technologies
• Research goals and challenges:• Improve accessibility and connectivity of government
services for users (ease to find the relevant services only)
• Simplify the usage of services for users: Creating an integrated hybrid scenario by combining relevant
atomic services Providing guidance to users while implementing the scenario
• Provide platform, tools, and methodology that enables to transform existing services to be semantically interoperable
April 21, 2023Autors: Ján hreňo, Marek Skokan, Tomáš
Sabol 8
Access-eGov outcomes
• Access-eGov platform • enables registration, semantic discovery and composition
of public administration (PA) services• Annotation tool (AT) - interface for PA users
• AT enables easy registration of PA services into the AeG system
• Personal Assistant Client (PAC) – interface for citizens • PAC assists users in the process of discovery, composition
and execution of relevant PA services into user scenarios• Methodology
• Facilitating deployment of the Access-eGov platform in organisation
• Pilot applications• 3 Pilot Applications (SK, PL, DE) and 1 Test Lab (Egypt)
April 21, 2023Autors: Ján hreňo, Marek Skokan, Tomáš
Sabol 9
Annotation Tool
April 21, 2023Autors: Ján hreňo, Marek Skokan, Tomáš
Sabol 10
Example: List of Instances Example: Annotation of a new service
Personal Assistant Client
April 21, 2023Autors: Ján hreňo, Marek Skokan, Tomáš
Sabol 11
April 21, 2023Autors: Ján hreňo, Marek Skokan, Tomáš
Sabol 12
Pilot Applications
• Slovakia: “Building permit & Land-use planning” scenario
• Poland: “Establishing an enterprise online” scenario
• Germany: “Getting married” scenario. Based on the existing good practice “Zustaendigkeitsfinder” ("Responsibility Finder"), by introducing a semantic layer (securing semantic interoperability between national and local governments).
• Egypt (German University of Cairo): Usability testing from outside EU.
April 21, 2023Autors: Ján hreňo, Marek Skokan, Tomáš
Sabol 13
Expected Benefits of Access-eGov
• Benefits for citizens/businesses:• Improved identification of government services
relevant to his/her case• Support for accessing the services• User tailored service composition• Combining electronic and “traditional” services• Guiding the user through life event scenario
• Benefits for service providers:• Easy registration of new services
April 21, 2023Autors: Ján hreňo, Marek Skokan, Tomáš
Sabol 14
Current status of the project
• First version of SW tools (Annotation Tool, Personal Assistant, AeG platform) developed
• SW tested (Trial #1) in three real life applications in three EU countries (SK, DE, PL) and in Egypt
• Based on evaluation of the Trial #1, 2nd version of the SW developed
• Trials #2 to be started in October 2008
April 21, 2023Autors: Ján hreňo, Marek Skokan, Tomáš
Sabol 15
Thank you Thank you for your attention!for your attention!
More at: www.accessegov.org
April 21, 2023Autors: Ján hreňo, Marek Skokan, Tomáš
Sabol 16
Evaluation of the first trial (1)
Annotation Tool
• Instruments used for collecting the feedback• Internal testing by developers• Testing by user partners• Feedback from annotators during the training sessions• Think-aloud session (GUC)• Accessibility and usability evaluation (e-Isotis)
• Results in summary• Use of AT was effective• Using the component without training is possible• Usability, efficiency and performance need to be improved
• Specifications for revision of AT regarding• Usability • Performance and efficiency• Annotation of existing web contents
April 21, 2023Autors: Ján hreňo, Marek Skokan, Tomáš
Sabol 17
Evaluation of the first trial (2)
Personal Assistant Client
• Instruments used for collecting the feedback• Internal tests of developers and user partners using TRAC (iterative tests)• Think-aloud sessions (SHG)• Workshop with PA‘s and IT experts (SHG)• Public testing with test scripts and feedback through email and interviews• Online and/or internal questionnaires• Accessibility and usability evaluation (e-Isotis)
• Results in summary• Use of PAC was (mostly) effective• Usability, navigation structure, and information quality need to be improved
• Specifications for revision of PAC regarding• Information quality • Navigation and structure of the services (step-by-step guide preferred)• Usability, incl. leading user through the process, labels of buttons, links, and
contextual help.