Upload
aminiali
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
approaches do exist that attempt to extract a single capacity value from test data, theentire load versus displacement response should be noted. Figure 7.8 shows the endbearing response as measured from a load test. A comparison between the measured andpredicted values should be prepared so that the original design approach can be cali-brated. The end bearing strength b is determined from strain gage data toe using thefollowing expression:
qb Ptoe=A toeEtoe (7:12)
7.8 Design of Postgrouted Shafts
The end bearing component of drilled shafts is only fractionally utilized in virtually alldesign methods (TCM < 1.0) due to the large displacement required to mobilize ultimatecapacity. Consequently, a large portion of the ultimate capacity necessarily goes unused.In an effort to regain some of this unusable capacity, mechanistic procedures to integrateits contribution have been developed using pressure grouting beneath the shaft tip (alsocalled postgrouting or base grouting). Pressure grouting the tips of drilled shafts has beensuccessfully used worldwide to precompress soft debris or loose soil relaxed by excav-ation (Bolognesi and Moretto, 1973; Stocker, 1983; Bruce, 1986; Fleming, 1993; Mullinset al., 2000 a, b; Dapp and Mullins, 2002). The postgrouting process entails: (1) installationof a grout distribution system during conventional cage preparation that provides grouttube-access to the bottom of the shaft reinforcement cage and (2) after the shaft concrete
End bearing (tsf)
Dis
plac
emen
t (in)
00
10 20 30 40
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Permissibledisplacement(e.g., 1.0 in.)
Effective ultimateend bearing
(28 tsf)
FIGURE 7.8End bearing load test results.
Gunaratne / The Foundation Engineering Handbook 1159_C007 Final Proof page 315 20.11.2005 10:55am
Design of Drilled Shafts 315