Upload
beatrix-underwood
View
217
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Forty Years of Public School Reform:
What the Data Tell Us
Randy Keyworth
Jack States
The Wing Institute
A value of 1.0 = perfect flatnessA value of 1.0 = perfect flatness
Pancake = .957Pancake = .957
Kansas = .999Kansas = .999
Texas State UniversityTexas State University
Arizona State UniversityArizona State University
Is Kansas Flatter Than a Pancake?Is Kansas Flatter Than a Pancake?
National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
Only nationally representative and continuing assessment of what America’s students know and can do in: math, reading, science, writing, the arts, civics, economics, geography, and U.S. History.
Common metric for all states
Stays the same each year with carefully documented changes
Administered by National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) within the Institute of Education Sciences within the U.S. Department of Education
Provides a clear picture of student academic progress over time
Tests are continually scrutinized for reliability and validity by panels of technical experts within NCES and by external groups.
A value of 1.0 = perfect flatnessA value of 1.0 = perfect flatness
Pancake = .957Pancake = .957
Kansas = .999Kansas = .999
40 years NAEP reading data = .99640 years NAEP reading data = .996
Is Kansas Flatter Than a Pancake?Is Kansas Flatter Than a Pancake?
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992, 1994, 1998, 2000, 2002, 2003, 2005, and 2007 Reading Assessments.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992, 1994, 1998, 2000, 2002, 2003, 2005, and 2007 Reading Assessments.
Grade 4
Grade 8
Grade 12
A value of 1.0 = perfect flatnessA value of 1.0 = perfect flatness
Pancake = .957Pancake = .957
Kansas = .999Kansas = .999
40 years NAEP reading data = .99640 years NAEP reading data = .996
5 years IES graduation rate data = .9925 years IES graduation rate data = .992
Is Kansas Flatter Than a Pancake?Is Kansas Flatter Than a Pancake?
1978 - 20041978 - 2004
Operated a large nonpublic school in SF Bay AreaOperated a large nonpublic school in SF Bay Areasix campuses adult programs
residential programs employment supportive services
public school consultation teacher training campus
CAPSES Board MemberCAPSES Board Member
President 1993-95 Regional Coordinator
GAC Committee local SELPA liaison
CAPSES “Street Cred”CAPSES “Street Cred”
The Wing InstituteThe Wing Institute
2004 - present2004 - present
independent, non-profit operating foundation
promote evidence-based education policies and practices
act as a catalyst to facilitate communication, cooperation and collaboration between individuals and organizations currently engaged in evidence based education
The Wing Institute’s Strategic Vision
Identify exemplars in evidence-based education
Develop networks to facilitate collaboration
Provide support for new ideas, research, and publications
Facilitate cross-discipline cooperation
www.winginstitute.org
Today’s DiscussionToday’s Discussion
What does performance monitoring data tell us about the effectiveness of 40 years of school reform?
What does education research data tell us about the effectiveness of 40 years of school reform?
REACHING AMERICA'S HEALTH POTENTIAL: A STATE-BY-STATE LOOK AT ADULT HEALTH Commission to Build a Healthier America May 2009 U.S. Census Data: American Community Survey (2007) U.S. Census Data: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data (2005-2007)
REACHING AMERICA'S HEALTH POTENTIAL: A STATE-BY-STATE LOOK AT ADULT HEALTH Commission to Build a Healthier America May 2009 U.S. Census Data: American Community Survey (2007) U.S. Census Data: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data (2005-2007)
Education and DelinquencyEducation and Delinquency
The odds of delinquency, given low academic performance, were about 2.1 times higher than those given high academic performance.
Intervention Studies showed that improvements in academic performance co-occurred or followed improvements in the prevalence of delinquency.
Maguin & Loeber, 1996
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Commerce, Census Bureau, Current Population Survey (CPS), October 1967 through October 2007.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Commerce, Census Bureau, Current Population Survey (CPS), October 1967 through October 2007.
Education is the civil rights issue of our generation.
Arne DuncanArne Duncan Secretary of Education Secretary of Education
20092009
PERFORMANCE FEEDBACKPERFORMANCE FEEDBACK
Performance feedback is one of the most important tools we have to assess and correct performance at all levels of the education system:
Student performance
Staff performance
Systems performance
STUDENT STUDENT PERFORMANCE FEEDBACKPERFORMANCE FEEDBACK
No Child Left Behind:
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
graduation rates
state test scores in reading and math
States can establish standards and goals
The Education Trust (2005)
127,292 high school students dropped out....70% were black or hispanic
1,252,396 high school students dropped out....53% were black, hispanic, or native american
Comparison of State AYP RequirementsComparison of State AYP Requirements
THOMAS B. FORDHAM I NSTITUTE (2008)
STUDENT STUDENT PERFORMANCE FEEDBACKPERFORMANCE FEEDBACK
Department of Education InitiativesDepartment of Education Initiatives
Adopting common standards and assessments
Building longitudinal data systems that measure student growth and success to support instruction
STUDENT STUDENT PERFORMANCE FEEDBACKPERFORMANCE FEEDBACK
Standardized Graduation Rate calculation
DOE amended regulations require states to adopt the “cohort model” by 2010-11:
four-year adjusted cohort graduation rate
disaggregated by subgroups
STUDENT STUDENT PERFORMANCE FEEDBACKPERFORMANCE FEEDBACK
Standardized Tests
Nation-wide standardized tests
43 States (so far)
2014 - 2015
Race to the TopRace to the Top
Build robust data systems to aggregate and disaggregate student outcome data
link teachers to students outcomes -- to distinguish between effective and ineffective teachers
to link effective teachers to their colleges of education – to distinguish between effective and ineffective programs
STAFF STAFF PERFORMANCE FEEDBACKPERFORMANCE FEEDBACK
1. Performance measures must be reliable and valid.
2. Staff should know the variables being measured
3. Skills must be identified to attain these measures
4. Staff feedback should be frequent and specific
5. Feedback should trigger and guide effecting coaching.
Hiring, Assignment, and Transfer in Chicago Public Schools Report from The New Teacher Project July 2007
Hiring, Assignment, and Transfer in Chicago Public Schools Report from The New Teacher Project July 2007
Only 3 out of 1,000 teachers rated unsatisfactory
93% of teachers received superior or excellent ratings
Hiring, Assignment, and Transfer in Chicago Public Schools Report from The New Teacher Project July 2007
87 Schools met criteria for being identified as “failing schools”
69 (79%) of these schools did not issue a single “unsatisfactory rating”
Hiring, Assignment, and Transfer in Chicago Public Schools Report from The New Teacher Project July 2007
STAFF STAFF PERFORMANCE FEEDBACKPERFORMANCE FEEDBACK
TRADITIONAL:
Performance measures must be reliable and valid.
Staff should know the variables being measured.
Skills must be identified to attain these measures.
Staff feedback should be frequent and specific.
Feedback should trigger and guide effecting coaching.
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
STAFF STAFF PERFORMANCE FEEDBACKPERFORMANCE FEEDBACK
LAUSD
Performance measures must be reliable and valid.
Staff should know the variables being measured.
Skills must be identified to attain these measures.
Staff feedback should be frequent and specific.
Feedback should trigger and guide effecting coaching.
Yes*
No
No
No
No
SYSTEM PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK
Most systemic school reform strategies have focused on
“structural fixes”
Structural Fixes….Commonly Held BeliefsStructural Fixes….Commonly Held Beliefs
SCHOOL RESOURCES
increase funding for students
higher pay for teachers
TEACHER QUALITY
more “Highly Qualified Teachers” (NCLB)
more teachers with credentials
more teachers with advanced degrees
more teachers with professional certifications (NBPTS)
comprehensive induction for new teachers
SCHOOL MODELS
smaller class size
school choice
charter schools
SCHOOL REFORM INITIATIVES
A Nation at Risk
Goals 2000
No Child Left Behind
Structural Fix: Increased Funding for Education
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2009). Digest of Education Statistics, 2008 (NCES 2009-020), Chapter 2 and Table 179.
IES National Center for Education Statistics Digest of Educational Statistics: 2008
Structural Fix: Increased Pay for TeachersStructural Fix: Increased Pay for Teachers
SOURCE: National Education Association, Status of the American Public School Teacher, 2000-01. (This table was prepared August 2003.)
Structural Fix: Advanced Degrees for Teachers Structural Fix: Advanced Degrees for Teachers
Master’s Degrees
Bachelor’s Degrees
Smith & Ingersoll, 2004
Structural Fix: More Induction Support for TeachersStructural Fix: More Induction Support for Teachers
Structural Fix: Class Size Reduction
32 States now have class size reduction programs in law:
Texas (1983) California (1996)
Tennessee (1989) New York (1997)
Minnesota (1990) Florida (2002)
There are currently over 5,000 Charter schools in the United States
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics
Structural Fix: More Charter SchoolsStructural Fix: More Charter Schools
A History of Structural Fixes
SCHOOL RESOURCES
increase funding for students
higher pay for teachers
TEACHER QUALITY
more “Highly Qualified Teachers” (NCLB)
more teachers with credentials
more teachers with advanced degrees
more teachers with professional certifications (NBPTS)
comprehensive induction for new teachers
SCHOOL MODELS
smaller class size
school choice
charter schools
SCHOOL REFORM INITIATIVES
A Nation at Risk
Goals 2000
No Child Left Behind
✔✔
✔✔✔
✔
✔
✔
✔✔✔
✔
✔
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992, 1994, 1998, 2000, 2002, 2003, 2005, and 2007 Reading Assessments.
National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
Basic denotes partial mastery of prerequisite knowledge and skills that are fundamental for proficient work at each grade.
Proficient represents solid academic performance. Students reaching this level have demonstrated competency over challenging subject matter.
Advanced represents superior performance.
Grade 4Grade 4 Grade 8Grade 8 Grade 12Grade 12
Basic = 208 Basic = 243 Basic = 265
Proficient = 238 Proficient = 281 Proficient = 302
Advanced = 268 Advanced = 323 Advanced = 346
Legislatively mandated four year comprehensive study.
Major CA research orgs: AIR, RAND, PACE, WestEd, EdSource
Conclusions (Final Report):
1. The relationship of CSR to student achievement was inconclusive…attribution to any gains in scores to CSR is unwarranted.
2. Students in CSR received more individual attention, but similar instruction and curriculum.
3. CSR remains very popular with parents and teachers.
CSR Research Consortium
PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK
we have had lousy performance feedback systemswe have had lousy performance feedback systemsstudent performance
teacher performance
system performance
we have have been focusing on the wrong thingswe have have been focusing on the wrong thingsstructural fixes haven’t worked
enormous time, energy and money has been wasted
there is hope on the horizonthere is hope on the horizonbetter student longitudinal data systems
standardized formulas for graduation rate data
uniform standardized tests
better tools for evaluating teacher performance
What’s going on????
The Education CultureThe Education Culture
Education has been a non-evidence-based culture:
Teaching is an “art”, not a “science”
Constructivism, anti-science, anti-measurement
Ruled by ideology, preferences, hunches, fads
The teaching profession has been stuck in a “guild” mentality
Teacher tenure
Resistance to performance appraisal
Most school reform strategies are not based on scientific evidence
Lack of fundamental research into teaching, curriculum, systems
Special interests drive initiatives
The culture drives simplistic, commonly held “beliefs”
Lack of performance feedback
What is the relationship between What is the relationship between teacher experience and effectiveness?teacher experience and effectiveness?
Kane, Rockoff, Staiger, 2006
What is the relationship between What is the relationship between teacher experience and effectiveness?teacher experience and effectiveness?
STUDENT PERFORMANCE FEEDBACKSTUDENT PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK
Sample of Graduation Rate calculations:
counting only seniors for graduation rates
(not freshman entering high school)
percentage of kids who got their diplomas in four years or less
number of graduates compared to 12th grade enrollment on the last day of school
Structural Fix: Major School Reform InitiativesStructural Fix: Major School Reform Initiatives
A Nation at Risk (1984)
Goals 2000 (1994)
No Child Left Behind (2001)
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1978, 1982, 1986, 1990, 1992, 1994, 1996, 1999, 2004, and 2008 Long-Term Trend Mathematics Assessments.
What’s Going On????What’s Going On????
TOOLS:
RoadmapRoadmap: a model for identifying critical components of evidence-based education
Data-mining: Data-mining: a mechanism for identifying, analyzing, and disseminating evidence
Keys to Evidence-Based Education
RESEARCH
selecting interventions
PERFORMANCE MONITORING
evaluating interventions