30
Innovating Sustainable CSR Sustainable CSR Fortune China CSR Ranking 2012 Analysis and Trends in China Sam Lee, CEO InnoCSR Co Ltd InnoCSR Co. Ltd Global Conference on CSR & Globalization Korea University Business School, April 13 2012

Fortune China CSR Ranking 2012 Analysis and Trends in …biz.korea.ac.kr/sites/korea.ac.kr.ibre/files/board/11_Sam_Lee.pdf · Fortune China CSR Ranking 2012 Analysis and Trends in

  • Upload
    haduong

  • View
    218

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Innovating Sustainable CSRSustainable CSR

Fortune China CSR Ranking 2012 gAnalysis and Trends in China

Sam Lee, CEOInnoCSR Co LtdInnoCSR Co. Ltd

Global Conference on CSR & Globalization Korea University Business School, April 13 2012

Outline

I FORTUNE CHINA CSR RANKING RESULTS

II HOW DO WE RANK THE COMPANIES?

III FORTUNE CHINA CSR RANKING INSIGHTS AND KEY LEARNINGSIII FORTUNE CHINA CSR RANKING INSIGHTS AND KEY LEARNINGS

IV GOING FURTHER WITH THE FORTUNE CHINA CSR RANKINGIV GOING FURTHER WITH THE FORTUNE CHINA CSR RANKING

2

Fortune China CSR Ranking Resultsg

Fortune China CSR Ranking ResultsMultinational CompaniesMultinational Companies

2012 Rank 2011 Rank Progress Fortune Global 500 Company Industry 2012 Score

1 15 ↑ 73 Sony Consumer Electronics 86.32 7 ↑ 22 Samsung Electronics Consumer Electronics 81.33 4 ↑ 195 Intel Technology 78.74 22 ↑ 365 3M Industrial Goods & Services 77.34 9 ↑ 25 F d M t A t bil 77 34 9 ↑ 25 Ford Motor Automobiles 77.36 24 ↑ 152 Dow Chemical Basic Materials 76.57 N/A N/A 79 BMW Automobiles 74.68 5 ↓ 71 BASF Basic Materials 74.59 8 ↓ 143 Nokia Technology 74.410 3 ↓ 89 Toshiba Consumer Electronics 74.111 28 ↑ 28 Hewlett-Packard Technology 73.912 N/A N/A 123 Johnson & Johnson Health Care 73.513 13 — 136 Unilever Personal & Household Goods 73.314 17 ↑ 1 W l M t St R t il 72 914 17 ↑ 1 Wal-Mart Stores Retail 72.915 10 ↓ 253 Sharp Consumer Electronics 72.716 46 ↑ 32 Carrefour Retail 70.317 12 ↓ 178 Bayer Basic Materials 70.118 6 ↓ 16 General Electric Industrial Goods & Services 69.519 1 ↓ 124 Dell Technology 68.920 2 ↓ 2 Royal Dutch Shell Oil & Gas 68.321 45 ↑ 52 International Business Machines Technology 68.122 44 ↑ 40 Hitachi Industrial Goods & Services 67.322 36 ↑ 47 Siemens Industrial Goods & Services 67 3

4

22 36 ↑ 47 Siemens Industrial Goods & Services 67.324 N/A N/A 90 Peugeot Automobiles 66.925 14 ↑ 8 Daimler Automobiles 66.5

Fortune China CSR Ranking ResultsChinese CompaniesChinese Companies

2012 Rank 2011 Rank Progress Fortune China 500 Company Industry 2012

Score

1 1 — 35 China COSCO Holdings Company Limited Industrial Goods & Services 74.82 13 ↑ 47 ZTE Corporation Technology 653 5 ↑ 16 Baoshan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd Basic Materials 62.64 4 — 5 China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation Oil & Gas 61.44 14 ↑ 1 China Railway Construction Corporation Limited Construction & Materials 61.46 18 ↑ 17 Ping An Insurance(Group) Company of China, Ltd Financials 597 29 ↑ 2 PetroChina Company Limited Oil & Gas 58.88 15 ↑ 32 Shanxi Taigang Stainless Steel Co., Ltd Basic Materials 579 2 ↓ 3 China Mobile Limited Telecommunication 56.8↓

10 43 ↑ 8 China State Construction Engineering Corporation Limited Construction & Materials 56.411 7 ↓ 21 China Shenhua Energy Company Limited Basic Materials 5411 38 ↑ 40 Wuhan Iron and Steel Company Limited Basic Materials 5413 3 ↓ 22 Lenovo Group Limited Technology 53.614 21 ↑ 41 Suning Appliance Co., Ltd Retail 50.615 11 ↓ 15 Metallurgical Corporation of China Ltd Basic Materials 50.215 40 ↑ 42 China Eastern Airlines Corporation Limited Airlines 50.217 18 ↑ 62 China Citic Bank Corporation Limited Financials 49.617 25 ↑ 34 Air China Limited Airlines 49.6↑19 9 ↓ 9 China Construction Bank Corporation Financials 49.420 8 ↓ 45 China Coal Energy Company Limited Basic Materials 48.221 39 ↑ 23 China Pacific Insurance (Group) Co., Ltd Financials 46.822 20 ↓ 7 Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited Financials 4622 30 ↑ 10 SAIC Motor Corporation Limited Automobile 46

5

22 30 ↑ 10 SAIC Motor Corporation Limited Automobile 4622 45 ↑ 4 China Railway Group Limited Construction & Materials 4625 N/A N/A 29 Huaneng Power International, Inc Utility 44

About the Fortune China CSR Ranking 2012g

1. Purposes of the Ranking

External purposesExternal purposes

• Raise CSR awareness through active communication

• Develop the business case for CSR in China - show how ‘doing good’ contributes to ‘doing well’good contributes to doing well

• Provide a standard for companies in China to assess their CSR performance

• Encourage healthy competition in social responsibility and towards CSV

• Develop in-depth and systematic understanding of companies’ CSR practices through research

Internal purposesInternal purposes

CSR practices through research

• Build database of CSR best practices

• Become the leader in evaluating and measuring companies’

7

Become the leader in evaluating and measuring companies CSR performances in China

2. Building Our Ranking Population Sample

Initial 1,000 companies• Fortune China 500• Fortune Global 500Fortune Global 500

Filtered to 112 companies• Top 50 companies from Fortune China 500Top 50 companies from Fortune China 500• Top 50 companies from Fortune Global 500 with

presence in China• MNC and CHN Companies among last year's

Fortune CSR Ranking Top 25 not originally included

Final 100 companies• Top 50 MNC ranked• Top 50 MNC ranked• Top 50 CHN ranked

8

3. Ranking Population Industry Distribution

AutomobileCHN

Automobile

Basic Materials

Consumer Electronics

MNC Automobiles

Basic MaterialsAuto Financials

Healthcare

Industrial Goods & Services

Consumer Electronics

Financials

Auto (17%)Tech

(17%)Basic Mat.

(22%)ServicesOil & Gas

Retail

Technology

Health Care

Industrials Goods Fin.

(21%)Telecommunication

Utility

Airlines

& Services

Oil & Gas

Retail

(21%)

Airlines

Construction & Materials

Retail

Industry distribution based on the Industry Classification Benchmark (ICB) (UK)

9

Industry distribution based on the Industry Classification Benchmark (ICB) (UK)

4. Developing Our Model (1)

Premises

Sustainability ratings Core content derives

Premises

Sustainability ratings vary significantly in structure, but share

considerable overlap in

Core content derives from international conventions e.g.

UNDHR ILO Coreconsiderable overlap in content

UNDHR, ILO Core Conventions.

Conventions form the basis for institutional

t d d Most ratings can bestandards (SA8000, ISO14000,

ISO26000 etc )

Most ratings can be analyzed via an ESG

framework.

10

ISO26000 etc.)

5. Developing Our Model (2) – Methodology

Analysis of CSR Rating frameworks

Mapping of International Conventions, CSR standards, Rankings

Extraction of Core CSR Factors (12 Key Criteria)

Analysis of CSR Rating frameworks

Extract common criteria Extract common indicators

Study of China CSR-Legal-Regulatory-Policy Drivers

Extraction of Core CSR Factors (12 Key Criteria)

Incorporate extracted ESG domain and indicators to create basic framework

S i M th d l

Study o C a CS ega egu ato y o cy e s

11th Five-Year Plan Extract National Policy Priorities Local CSR guidelines

Finalization of Fortune China CSR Ranking Model

Scoring Methodology

11

Finalization of Fortune China CSR Ranking Model

6. Developing Our Model (3)

Mapping and Analysis of Conventions

To build our framework, InnoCSR Research Team studied d d k d l

Mapping and Analysis of Conventions

Conventions Rating Models & Reporting Guidelines

70+ standards, rankings, rating models, conventions

Conventions Rating Models & Reporting GuidelinesUN Declaration on Human Rights DJSI Accountability RatingOECD Guidelines for MNC Enterprises Innovest Asian Sustainability Rating

ILO Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work Good Corporation Analista

UN Global Compact GSES Asset 4

UN Millennium Goals Ethibel Bank Sarasin

Rio Declaration on Energy Corporate Knights CRI

Stockholm Convention on Organic Pollutants Covalence SA Calvert GroupStockholm Convention on Organic Pollutants Covalence SA Calvert Group

ISO 26000 Guidance on Social Responsibility VIGEO FTSE4Good

UN Declaration on Anti Corruption and Bribery KLD REPU Tex

SA8000 AA1000AS GRI

12

7. Developing Our Model (4)

Extraction of Key Criteria 

ENVIRONMENT SOCIAL GOVERNANCE

l b dEnvironmental Management Labor Practices Board Structure & Diversity

Pollution Prevention Supply Chain Fair Marketplace Practices

Resource Use Customer Relations CSR ManagementResource Use Customer Relations CSR Management

Climate Change & Biodiversity Community Involvement CSR Communication

13

8. Developing Our Model (5)

Chinese Legal/Policy Analysis

• Labor Contract• Consumer Rights• Company

• Environmental• Circular Economy Promotion• Energy Conservation

g / y y

p y• Occupational Disease• Work Safety• Product Quality• Advertising

gy• Pollution• Water and Social

Conservation• Waste• Desertification

China E l China Social DesertificationEnvironmental

Laws

China Social Laws

• CGI/SRI Index SSE

National Development P l /Pl

China CSR Trends

• 11th Five Year Guidelines for Economic and Social Development

• Five Year Plan for Energy Development

• CSA8000 • SASAC Guideline• CSC9000T• HM3000• Financial Association

Policy/PlansTrends

14

• Medium and Long Term Plan for Renewable Energy Development

Financial Association • Shanghai Local CSR• Shenzhen Stock Exchange CSR

9. Developing Our Model (6)

S i S

ESG i hti ll i d t i

Scoring System

ESG weighting across all industries:

• Environment: 40%• Social: 40%• Government: 20%

Environment Social Governance40% 40% 20%

China-focus:

• For MNCs, China-specific information required for full score in key CSR areas

15

score in key CSR areas

9. Developing Our Model

Fi l F k

3

Final Framework

3 domains

12 criteria12 criteria

40 sub-criteria

139 indicators

Draws an accurate and in-depth picture of the state of

16

Draws an accurate and in-depth picture of the state of CSR integration in China

10. Limitations of the Model

Scope of information• Only publicly disclosed information is captured• Only publicly disclosed information is captured

Sample size100 i k d• 100 companies ranked

• 12 companies included from 2011 CSR Ranking

Different scoring system for MNC and CHNDifferent scoring system for MNC and CHN• MNC and CHN cannot be compared directly

H f tHuman factor• Subjectivity of analysis

17

Fortune China CSR Ranking 2012Key Findingsy g

1. CSR is NOT Corporate Charity

A MNC CSR S MULTINATIONALS• Top 10 Donors donate 17 times more than Bottom 10 Donors

69.61 67.20

Average MNC CSR Score

• Difference between the 2 groups is only 2 points• Increasing donation rates do not gnecessarily lead to better CSR.

Average CSR CHN Score

Top 10 Donors(0.34% of Revenue)

Bottom 10 Donors(0.02% of Revenue)

CHINESE COMPANIES• More than 85% of Chinese firms got maximum score for donations.

45.0837.84

g

• Donations do not account for point difference. • Top donors also focus on other areas

19

Top donors also focus on other areas of CSR. Top 10 Donors

(0.18% of Revenue)Lowest 10 Donors

(0.003% of Revenue)

2. CHN Still Lag Behind MNC in Most CSR Areas

Gap between MNC and CHN for the 12

Board Structure & DiversityCSR Management

pcriteria

Supply Chain CSR Engagement

Labor PracticesCommunity Development

CSR communicationSustainable Resource Use

Supplier Engagement on CSR

Fair Operating PracticesPollution Prevention Consumer Protection

Labor Practices

Responsible Purchasing Policy

Supplier Compliance & Monitoring

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Supply ChainClimate Change and Biodiversity

Environment Management0 20 40 60 80

MNC CHN

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

MNC CHN

• Chinese companies still lag behind the multinational companies on all it i t CSR t

20

criteria except CSR management• Still very few Chinese companies perform CSR screening and audits on their suppliers

3. External Audits Reinforce Transparency

Percentage of MNC tti t l dit Average scores of

36%

getting external audits

80

Average scores of companies conducting

audits

64%

36%

50.5

67.3

57.7

50

60

70

Percentage of CHN getting external audits

39.4

20

30

40

28%

72%

0

10

20

CHN MNC72%

CSR reports that are audited by a 3rd-party result in higher overall CSR score:

17% hi h f MNC

21

- 17% higher for MNC- 28% higher for CHN

4. German Firms Best Environmental Performers

Environmental Performance

4445464748 At ESG level

Strict governmental regulations iti l i fl G i ’

4041424344 positively influence German companies’

environmental performance

7080

Environment Domain BreakdownJapanese companies

German companies

American companies

2030405060

At 12 criteria level

G0

10

Environment Management

Pollution Prevention

Sustainable Resource Use

Climate Change and Biodiversity

German companies perform best in Environment management

d P ll ti P ti

22

Biodiversity

Japanese companies German companiesAmerican companies

and Pollution Prevention.

5a. External Influence Also Shapes CSR in China

hi Domestic companies score 50% higher, on related issues related to the 11th Five-Year Plan than on issues not directly related

Chinese Government•11th Five‐Year Plan (Labor Practices)•12th Five‐Year Plan (Climate Change)•MofCom SASAC CASS directly related.MofCom, SASAC, CASS

Industry Associations

Most of the technology and consumer electronics companies follow the EICC code of conduct.

•China National Textile and ApparelCouncil

•China Banking Association•Electronic Industry Citizenship

76% of the CHN follow the Shanghai

Electronic Industry CitizenshipCoalition

•76% of the CHN follow the Shanghai Stock Exchange CSR reporting guidelines•80% of the top 10 MNC are listed on

External Investors•DJSI, FTSE4Good•Shanghai Stock Exchange Guidelines•SRI CSR Rating Companies

23

pthe DJSI.

•SRI, CSR Rating Companies

5b. Example: EICC Code of Conduct

Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition (EICC): brings globalElectronic Industry Citizenship Coalition (EICC): brings global electronics companies together to improve CSR standards in the global supply chain with their Code of Conduct.

1. Most of the technology (70%) and consumer electronics (50%) MNCs in our Ranking follow the EICC code of conductMNCs in our Ranking follow the EICC code of conduct

2. These two industries are among the best performing in our ranking (top 5) and the most represented in the top 25 MNCs

3. Top CHNs in these industries (ZTE, Lenovo) also adopted the EICC Code

Stringent standards help harmonize industry CSR performance, and clarify stakeholder expectations for companies

24

and clarify stakeholder expectations for companies

6. Top CSR Performers can Improve in 4 Areas

• Further commit to reducing GHG and achieving Carbon Neutrality

• Set targets for Air Emissions and Energy Consumption

Environment25% of the Top25 did not have Energy Consumption

Targets gy p

• Incorporate tools to ensure new products are safe and being Product

SafetyOnly 12% of the Top25 assessed health impacts transparent about Product SafetySafety

• Establish policies to ensure worker

assessed health impacts of new products

21% of the Top25 • Establish policies to ensure worker rights and programs to help employees transition out of companies

Labor Practices

21% of the Top25 supported employees

made redundant

• Focus on minimizing risks by proactively identifying areas at risk to corruption and bribery.

Corporate Ethics

15% of the Top25 were actively searching for

corruption

25

7. CSR Trends in China

Scope of CSR in China is constantly expanding

Chinese Government’s 12th 5-year plan includes climate change

Gap in CSR performance between CHN and MNC

But Top 3 CHN perform as well as Top MNCsCHN and MNC

E t l t k h ld d i

Top MNCs

Chinese Government, industry External stakeholders are drivers of CSR in China

, yassociations and financial markets influence CSR in China

Booming of the CSR reporting practices

Companies face increased pressure and are provided guidelines by the Chinese

26

pguidelines by the Chinese Government at the same time

Going Further with the Fortune China CSR Rankingg

Going Further with the Fortune China CSR Ranking

Identify best practices from different companies 12 ESG criteria, 40 sub criteria

Identify industry trends and specific benchmarking points 139 indicators

Assess companies in a holistic way and provide comparisons amongst competitors

Fortune China CSR Ranking +

CSR standardsSRI indicesOther CSR rankings

Find correlations between CSR and brand value, market share, etc.

Fortune China CSR Ranking

non-CSR rankings and standards

vs.

Year-to-year comparison of improvements in the CSR landscape

, ,

Fortune China CSR Ranking 2011 2012 2013

g standards

28

p o e e ts t e CS a dscapeAnalysis of the reasons behind them2011, 2012, 2013…

Example: ESG for Sony, Samsung and Intel

Environment Social Governance

Sony #1 - Green Star #1 – CSR training for #13 – Lack of diversity

Environment Social Governance

Sony Program employees in Board of Directors

#2 – Diversity target

Samsung

#5 - Eco-Partner Certification Scheme,Largest portfolio of

#2 Diversity target for female employees: 30% new university graduates and target

%

#32 - Lack of diversityin Board of Directors,No disclosure on boardLargest portfolio of

eco-friendly products >10% executives to within the next 10 years.

No disclosure on board compensation

Intel

#13 – No disclosure of targets for air pollutants,

#3 – Intel’s education programs such as Intel Teach and Intel

#2 – Link executive and employees’, compensation to CSR

29

No disclosure of ISO 14001 in China

Intel Teach, and Intel e-learning

compensation to CSR performance

Innovating Sustainable CSRSustainable CSR

"It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it."

Warren Buffet- Warren Buffet

Tel: +86-21-5237-7387Tel: 86 21 5237 7387Fax: +86-21-5190-1040中国上海市长宁区华山路1336号 玉嘉大厦11 楼 A-2座, 200052www innocsr com

30

www.innocsr.com