Formacion Batá - Etayo_de Porta

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 Formacion Bat - Etayo_de Porta

    1/5

    The BataFormation of Colombia is truly Cretaceous, not Jurassic

    F. Etayo Sernaa,*, N. SoleDe Portab, J. De Portab, T. Gaonaa

    aDepartamento de Geociencias, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Santafe de Bogota, Cundinamarca, ColombiabDepartament dEstratigrafia i Paleontologia, Facultat de Geologia, Universitat de Barcelona, C/Marti Franquis s/n, 08028 Barcelona, Spain

    Received 1 May 2001; accepted 1 July 2001

    Abstract

    The BataFormation has been a key unit in paleogeographic reconstructions of Colombia since it was first described as a Jurassic unit.

    However, the paleontologic evidence for this age was not beyond doubt. The trigoniids collected from the upper part of the unit were

    misidentified and should be referred to the late late Jurassic early Cretaceous genus Syrotrigonia. On palynomorph evidence, the

    Interulobites triangularis, Cyclusphaera psilata, Classopolis, and Balmeiopsis limbatusassemblage indicates that the section should be late

    Valanginian Hauterivian in age.

    q 2003 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.

    Keywords:Bataformation; Microfossils; Bivalves; Early Cretaceous

    Resumen

    La Formacion Bataha sido clave en las reconstrucciones paleogeograficas de Colombia desde que fue descrita como una unidad delJurasico. Sin embargo la documentacion paleontologica para su datacion no estuvo libre de dudas. Los trigonidos colectados en la parte

    superior de la unidad deben asignarse al generoSyrotrigoniade finales del Jurasico y comienzos del Cretacico. Con base en la asociacion de

    los palinomorfos Interulobites triangularis, Cyclusphaera psilata, Classopolis y Balmeiopsis limbatus la edad de esta sucesion debe

    considerarse Valanginiano tardoHauteriviano.

    q 2003 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.

    Palabras clave:Formacion Bata; microfosiles; bivalvos; Cretacico temprano

    1. Current status of the BataFormation

    1.1. Name

    The stratigraphic section measured at rock outcrops

    along the road that follows the BataRiver near the town of

    Santa Mara (Boyaca Department, Fig. l) was considered

    representative of the (Rhetico)-Liasico by Burgl (1961,

    Fig. 9). In his dissertation on the geology of Colombia,

    Radelli (1967, pp. 105) cursorily called these beds

    Formacion Santa Mara. It was Geyer (1967, pp. 16)

    who first expressed the need to formalize this unit:

    Zumindest der mittlere und obere Teil dieser Bata-

    Formation (wie ich die Serie nennen mochte) is sicher

    marin. This paragraph was overlooked by Ulloa and

    Rodrguez (1979) when they wrote Se propone en este

    trabajo el nombre de Formacion Bata, for the same section

    described by Burgl. Thus, the formational name must be

    credited to Geyer.

    1.2. Boundaries

    An erosional scar on well-indurated Carboniferous rocks

    marks the base of the Bata Formation; it is probably

    overthrust at the top by a thick, fine-grained shale unit

    interpreted as Berriasian (Burgl, 1961).

    1.3. Lithology

    The light-colored conglomerate deposits exposed at the

    base of the section named Conjunto A by Ulloa and

    Rodrguez (1979) was derived from erosion of the

    underlying sedimentary rocks. The upper part of the section

    0895-9811/03/$ - see front matter q 2003 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.

    doi:10.1016/S0895-9811(03)00048-8

    Journal of South American Earth Sciences 16 (2003) 113117www.elsevier.com/locate/jsames

    * Corresponding author.

    E-mail address:[email protected] (F.E. Serna).

    http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jsameshttp://www.elsevier.com/locate/jsames
  • 8/12/2019 Formacion Bat - Etayo_de Porta

    2/5

    Fig. 1. Location of the studied area, indicating the location of stratigraphic sections: I. the Bata Formation type locality, II. the Cumbre Formation t

  • 8/12/2019 Formacion Bat - Etayo_de Porta

    3/5

    consists of medium-grained quartz sandstone and fine

    conglomerate interbedded with black mudstone layers that

    become dominant in the upper part of the section.

    1.4. Thickness

    Burgl (1961) indicated a thickness of 1300 m for this

    section,Ulloa and Rodrguez (1979)presented it as having

    1160 m, and our measurements, by the compass and tape

    method, of the section above the conglomerate (Conjuntos

    A and B) are shown inFig. 2.

    1.5. Conventional age

    The trigoniids collected byBurgl (1961)from the upper

    part of the unit were identified as Trigonia aff. literataYoung and Bird, Trigonia (Geratrigonia) kurumensis

    Kobayashi, and Trigonia lingonensis Dumortier and

    referred to the Upper Liassic. Geyer (1973),who collected

    fossils at the same locality, concluded that the Trigonia

    belong to Vaugonia and described two new subspecies as

    Vaugonia niranohamensis santa-mariae and Vaugonia

    yokoyamai batafluviaethat were considered Lower Liassic.

    D. Gutierrez (unpublished INGEOMINAS report, 1969)

    also concluded that the fauna of the Bata formation belongto the Liassic (Ulloa and Rodrguez, 1979).

    2. New age assignation for the BataFormation

    Three lines of arguments support our assignment of the

    Bata formation to the Cretaceous. First is taxonomic

    reevaluation of Burgls (1961) and Geyers (1973) deter-

    minations. We have measured the fossiliferous interval of

    the type locality and collected additional material from the

    same fossiliferous beds studied byBurgl (1961, his locality

    HB2576) and Geyer (1973). Although we have had an

    opportunity to cast Burgls original material, housed at the

    Paleontological Collection of the Museo Geologico Jose

    Royo y Gomez, INGEOMINAS, Bogota, we could not

    locate Geyers specimens in the Paleontological Collection

    of the Stuttgart University (Dr M. Senff, pers. comm.).Through the kindness of Drs T. Setoguchi and I. Hayami, we

    were able to examine the plastoholotypes of the Japanese

    species with which Geyer compared his specimens. As

    previously suggested by Etayo Serna (inPerez and Reyes,

    1986, 1997; Etayo Serna and de Porta, in prep.), the valid

    assignment of Burgls and Geyers species is to Syrotrigo-

    nia, the Peruvian congeneric species described by Lisson

    (1930)as Trigonia forti,and Trigonia steinmanni from the

    eocretacico of the outskirts of Huaylas (Upper Valangi-

    nian, Alleman, 1987). Incidentally, in his paper, Lisson

    (1930)remarked that his T. forti presented an affinity with

    Trigonia literataYoung and Bird.

    Geyers Cucullaea (s.l.) sp. ex gr. mabuchii Hayami,1958 is a common species and the subject of a systematic

    study (Gaona, in prep.). By its heterodont dentition, it does

    not belong toCucullaea. We refer our specimens to Cardiids

    or Carditids inFig. 2.

    Second, there is the comparative biostratigraphic argu-

    ment. Following the revision of the Cretaceous stratigraphic

    succession of the Middle Magdalena Valley (Etayo Serna,

    1989) the lowermost Cretaceous units are, from bottom to

    top: the fluviatile Los SantosArcabuco formations (Ber-

    riasian?), followed by the intertidal to shallow marine

    Cumbre formation and the platform carbonates of the

    Rosablanca Formation of Valanginian age. The Cumbre

    Formation hence represents the first marine ingression

    during Early Cretaceous times into the Santander massif. In

    this unit, we find the same Carditids as those found in the

    Bata Formation and the Berriasian beds of the Ro Bata

    section (Etayo Serna, 1989; herein,Fig. 2).Third, there is new paleontological evidence. We

    measured and collected from the fossiliferous part of the

    type section of the Bata Formation twice (1982 and 1997)

    and have studied the palynomorphs of the two sets of

    samples (29) with scant recovery except for samples 182056

    and PEL8b. The latter belongs to the same bed, just above

    the former.

    Sample 182056 yielded the following taxa (see Fig. 2):

    cf.Cyathidites

    cf.Reticulatisporites

    cf.Klukisporites

    Klukisporitessp.Verrucosisporites sp.

    Taurocusporitescf. segmentatusStover 1962

    Interulobitescf. triangutaris (Brenner) Phillips 1971

    Polycingulatisporites trabeculatus Archangelsky 1983

    Pteridophytae indet.

    Callialasporites dampieri (Balme) Dev 1961

    Balmeiopsis limbatus(Balme) Archangelsky 1977

    Classopollissp.

    Foraminiferal linings

    Dinoflagellate indet.

    Sample PEL8b yielded the following taxa (seeFig. 2):

    Aequitriraditescf. spinulosus (Cook. and Dett.)

    Taurocusporitessp.

    Trilobosporitessp.

    Reticulatisporitessp.

    Verrucosisporites sp.

    Uvaesporitessp.

    Klukisporitessp.

    Cicatricosisporitessp.

    Gleicheniiditessp.

    Pteridophytaeindet.

    Podocarpiditessp.

    Callialasporitescf. dampieri (Balme) Dev 1961

    Callialasporites trilobatus(Balme) Dev 1961Classopollissp.

    F.E. Serna et al. / Journal of South American Earth Sciences 16 (2003) 113117 115

  • 8/12/2019 Formacion Bat - Etayo_de Porta

    4/5

    Fig. 2. Stratigraphic sections of the BataFormation and Cumbre Formations, according to different authors, showing distribution of taphonomic assemblages of bivalves and

    shown inFig. 1.Ca, Cb, etc. are provisional paleontological nomenclature.

  • 8/12/2019 Formacion Bat - Etayo_de Porta

    5/5

    cf.Cyclusphaera psilata Volkheimer and Sepulveda

    (1976)

    Cycadopitessp.

    Foraminiferal linings

    Dinoflagellate indet.

    The assemblage of Taurocusporites segmentatus, Inter-

    ulobites triangularis, Cyclusphaera psilata, Classopollis,

    andBalmeiopsis limbatusappears in the basal Cretaceous of

    Argentina (Archangelsky, 1980). For Archangelsky et al.

    (1984), the chronostratigraphic assignation of this assem-

    blange is Upper ValanginianHauterivian. The assemblage

    is equivalent to that described by Volkheimer and

    Sepulveda (1976), Archangelsky and Seiler (1980) from

    the interval of the Agro Formation dated as late to early

    Valanginianearly Barremian.Aguirre-Urreta et al. (1999)

    confirm this age.

    The palynological content of this part of the Bata

    Formation corresponds with the Cyclusphaera Classopol-

    lis assemblange of Volkheimer (1980) and the Interulo-

    bitesForaminisporis zone ofArchangelsky et al. (1984),

    which is characterized by C. psitata, B. limbatus, and T.

    segmentatus and referred by these authors to the Upper

    ValanginianHauterivian.

    3. Conclusions

    The Trigonia and Vaugonia species, on which theJurassic age of the Bata Formation was based, turned out

    to be species ofSyrotrigonia,a genus known from the Upper

    Jurassic (Upper Titonian) to Lower Cretaceous (Leanza,

    1993). The palynomorphs recovered from this formation

    correspond to those of the Upper ValangianianHauterivian

    assemblages of Argentina. Dominance of Pteridophyta

    indicates a humid regime, and the abundance of theSchizaeacea (?) Klukisporites suggest a warm climate.

    This change in the assignation of age for the Bata Formation

    enhances the paleogeographic interpretation of the Jurassic

    of Colombia (cf.Geyer, 1979; Senff, 1995).

    Acknowledgements

    We thank Drs Takeshi Setoguchi (Kyoto University) and

    Itaru Hayami (University of Tokyo) for kindly supplying the

    plaster casts of some Japanese Vaugonia and Cucullaea.

    Fieldwork was carried out with the assistance of G. Renzoni

    and C. Ulloa (1982) and L. Daz (1997). We thank Geotec

    Ltd for placing their facilities at our disposal and Mr Daniel

    Carrillo for drawing the Figures. Reviews by Drs H. Duque

    Caro, H. Parent, G. Gonzalez Bonorino, and an anonymous

    reviewer of the English text significantly improved the

    manuscript. This research has been supported by the

    Universidad Nacional de Colombia, INGEOMINAS andthe Universitat de Barcelona.

    References

    Aguirre-Urreta, M.B., Concheyro, A., Lorenzo, M., Ottone, E.G., Rawson,

    P.F., 1999. Advances in the biostratigraphy of the Agrio Formation

    (Lower Cretaceous) of the Neuquen basin Argentina: ammonites,

    palynomorphs and calcareous nannofossils. Palaeogeography, Palaeo-

    climatology, Palaeoecology 150 (1/2), 3347.

    Alleman, V., 1987. Una recoleccion de moluscos fosiles en el Distrito de

    Huaylas. Departamento de Ancash, Universidad Ricardo Palma,

    Facultad de Ciencias Biologicas, Boletn 3, 3035

    Archangelsky, S., 1980. Palynology of the Lower Cretaceous in Argentina,

    Fourth International Palynology Conference, Lucknow (197677), vol.

    2., pp. 425428.

    Archangelsky, S., Seiler, J., 1980. Algunos resultados palinologicos de la

    perforacion UN-OIL OS 1, SO de la provincia de Chubut, Argentina.

    Segundo Congreso Argentino de Paleontologa y Bioestratigrafa y

    Primer Congreso Latinoamericano de Paleontologa, Actas 5, 215225.

    Archangelsky, S., Baldoni, K., Gamerro, J.C., Seiler, J., 1984. Palinologa

    estratigrafica del Cretacico de Argentina Austral, III. Distribucion de las

    especies y conclusiones. Ameghiniana 21 (1), 1533.

    Burgl, H., 1961. El Jurasico e infracretaceo del ro Bata, Boyaca. Instituto

    Geologico Nacional, Bogota, Boletn Geologico 6 (13), 169211.

    Etayo Serna, F., 1989. Analisis facial del inicio del avance marino del

    Cretacico en la region SW del Macizo de Santander, Gua de la

    excursion pre-congreso, V Congreso Colombiano de Geologa,

    Bucaramanga, pp. 18

    Geyer, O.F., 1967. Das TypusProfil der MorrocoyalFormation

    (Unterlias: Depto. Bolvar, Kolumbien), Mitteilungen Instituto

    Colombo Aleman de Investigaciones Cientficas 1, 5363

    Geyer, O.F., 1973. Das prakretazische Mesozoikum von Kolumbien.

    Geologisches Jahrbuch B 5, 1155.

    Geyer, O.F., 1979. Zur Palaogeographie mesozoischer Ingressionen und

    Transgressionen in Kolumbien. Neues Jahrbuch fur Mineralogie,

    Geologie und Palaontologie, Monatshefte 6, 349668.

    Leanza, H.A., 1993. Jurassic and Cretaceous trigoniid bivalves from west-

    central Argentina. Bulletins of American Paleontology 105 (343),

    195.

    Lisson, C.I., 1930. Contribucion al conocimiento de algunas Trigonias

    neocomicas del Peru. Boletn de Minas Industrias y Construcciones,

    Serie 2 20 (112), 326.

    Perez, E., Reyes, R., 1986. Presencia de Buchotrigonia (Syrotrigonia) Cox,

    1952 (Bivalvia; Trigoniidae) en Sudamerica y descripcion de dos

    especies nuevas. Revista Geologica de Chile 28/29, 7793.

    Perez, E., Reyes, R., 1997. Interpretacion taxonomica de los buchotrigo-

    nidos (Bivalvia; Trigonioida) y descripcion de una nueva especie de

    Syrotrigonia del Cretacico Inferior de Chile. Revista Geologica de

    Chile 24 (2), 245257.

    Radelli, L., 1967. Geologie des Andes Colombiennes. These, Faculte des

    Sciences de LUniversitede Grenoble, BI-12 1-455

    Senff, M., 1995. Sedimentologie, Fauna und Fazies des pra kretazisches

    Mesozoikum im Oberen Magdalenatal von Zentralkolumbien unter

    besonderer Berucksichtigung der obertriassischen PayandeFormation.

    Unpublished Dissertation, Justus-Liebig-Universitat Giessen, pp. 1

    132

    Ulloa, C., Rodrguez, E., 1979. Geologa del Cuadrangulo K-12. Guateque

    Boletn Geologico, Ingeominas 22 (1), 355.

    Volkheimer, W., 1980. Microfloras del Jurasico Superior y Cretacico

    Inferior de America Latina. Segundo Congreso Argentino de Paleonto-

    loga y Bioestratigrafa y Primer Congreso Latinoamericano de

    Paleontologa, Actas 5, 121136.

    Volkheimer, W., Sepulveda, E., 1976. Biostratigraphische Bedeutung und

    mikrofloristische Assoziation von Cyclusphaera psilata n. sp. einer

    Leitform aus der Unterkreide (Agrio-Folge) des Neuquen Beckens

    (Argentinien), Neues Jahrbuch fur Geologie und Palaontologie,

    Monatshefte 2, 97 108.

    F.E. Serna et al. / Journal of South American Earth Sciences 16 (2003) 113117 117