Form No. 4 [See rule 11(1)] ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES ...aftlko.up.nic.in/C2 Daily Order/c2 Order-2017/c1(b... · Present: Shri V.K. Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and Ashish

Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 1 (List B)

M.A. No. 97 of 2017 Inre O.A. No. Nil of 2017

Shambhu Dayal Shrivastava Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for Applicant

Versus

Union of India & Others Respondents

By Legal Practitioner for Respondents

Notes of the

Registry

Orders of the Tribunal

24.01.2017

Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J)

Hon’ble Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan, Member (A)

Memo of appearance filed by Shri D.K. Pandey on behalf of

respondents is taken on record. Let his name be shown as counsel for

the respondents, when the case is listed next.

Present: Shri Bachchan Singh, learned counsel for the applicant

and Shri D.K. Pandey, learned counsel for the respondents.

This is an application for condonation of delay moved by the

applicant for payment of disability pension. As per office report, it is

delayed by 18 years, 08 months and 14 days in filing the Original

Application.

Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted four

weeks’ time to file objection on application for condonation of delay.

Replication, if any, may be filed by learned counsel for the applicant

within four weeks, thereafter.

List this case on 01.05.2017 for orders.

(Lt Gen Gyan Bhushan) (Justice D.P. Singh)

Member (A) Member (J) SB

Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET




Akhilesh Kumar Pandey Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


24.01.2017



Memo of appearance filed by Mohd Zafar Khan on behalf of

respondents is taken on record. Let his name be shown as counsel for the

respondents, when the case is listed next.

Present: Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the

applicant and Mohd Zafar Khan, learned counsel for the respondents.

This is an application for condonation of delay moved by the

applicant for payment of disability pension. As per office report, it is

delayed by 04 years, 06 months and 03 days in filing the Original

Application.




within four weeks, thereafter.




Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



O.A. No. 27 of 2017

Col Ran Singh Dudee Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


24.01.2017



Present: The applicant, Col Ran Singh Dudee, in person and Dr.

Shailendra Sharma Atal, learned counsel for the respondents assisted by

Maj Salen Xaxa, Departmental Representative.

This application has been filed by the applicant under Section 14

of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 being aggrieved for non

payment of arrears/outstanding dues to the applicant after his

restoration in service in pursuance to order of Govt of India. Applicant

has submitted his representation for grant of his dues vide letter dated

22.07.2016 (Annexure No 6 of O.A.) which is pending with the

respondents.

With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, we proceed to

decide the application finally at admission stage itself and direct the

respondents to decide the representation of the applicant dated

22.07.2016 by a speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law

expeditiously say within a period of four months from the date of

production of certified copy of this order and communicate the

decision to the applicant.

With the aforesaid direction, Original Application is disposed of

finally.


Member (A) Member (J) ukt

Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



EX.A. No. 235 of 2016 Inre T.A. No. 986 of 2010

Rajveer Singh Applicant


Versus

Union of India & & Others Respondents


Notes of the

Registry


24.01.2017



Present: Shri Bachchan Singh, learned counsel for the applicant

and Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, learned counsel for the respondents.


weeks’ further time to produce PPO and file compliance report.




Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



EX.A. No. 247 of 2016 Inre O.A. No. 302 of 2013

Parmatma Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


24.01.2017



Present: Shri V.A. Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and

Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondents.


weeks’ further time to submit compliance report with regard to

Tribunal’s order dated 10.12.2015.




Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



EX.A. No. 248 of 2016 Inre O.A. No. 80 of 2014

Gopal Krishan Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


24.01.2017



Present: Shri R. Chandra, holding brief of Shri Parijaat Belaura,

learned counsel for the applicant and Dr. Chet Narain Singh, learned

counsel for the respondents.

Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in pursuance to

judgment and order under execution, necessary PPO has been issued.

He prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to produce the same

before the Tribunal on the date fixed.




Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



M.A. No. 1833 of 2015 with M.A. No. 1239 & 2314 of 2016

Ram Naresh Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


24.01.2017




applicant and Shri A.K. Sahu, learned counsel for the respondents.

M.A. No. 160 of 2017

Better affidavit in support of application for condonation of

delay, filed by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record.

Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted two



within two weeks, thereafter.




Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



M.A. No. 1384 of 2016

Smt. Laxmi Devi Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


24.01.2017



Present: None for the applicant and Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal,

learned counsel for the respondents.

On call of the case, no one appears for the applicant, however, in

the interest of justice, the case is adjourned.




Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET




Anil Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


24.01.2017



Present: Shri V.K. Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and

Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondents.

M.A. No. 161 of 2017

Objection on application for condonation of delay filed by

learned counsel for the respondents is taken on record.

Learned counsel for the applicant prays for and is granted four

weeks’ time to file replication to objection on application for

condonation of delay.




Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET




Bijendra Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


24.01.2017



Present: Shri Yash Pal Singh, learned counsel for the applicant

and Shri Amit Sharma, learned counsel for the respondents.








Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET




Prem Veer Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


24.01.2017



Present: Shri Virat Anand Singh, learned counsel for the

applicant and Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the

respondents.








Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



M.A. No. 2672 of 2016 Inre O.A. No. 221 of 2015

Smt. Moti Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


24.01.2017



Present: Shri R.P.S. Kuruvanshi, learned counsel for the applicant

and Shri Rajiv Pandey, learned counsel for the respondents.

Learned counsel for the applicant prays for and is granted a

week’s further time to deposit the cost as imposed vide order dated

14.12.2016.




Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



O.A. No. 470 of 2012 with M.A. No. 1468 & 1759 of 2016

Naseebul Hasan Syed Applicant


Versus

Chief of Army Staff & Others Respondents


Notes of the

Registry


24.01.2017



Present: Maj R.D. Singh (Retd), learned counsel for the applicant

and Shri Ashish Saxena, learned counsel for the respondents.


weeks’ and no more time to file objection on amendment application.






Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



O.A. No. 193 of 2016

Prem Prakash Bhandari Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


24.01.2017



Present: Col B.P. Singh (Retd), learned counsel for the applicant

and Shri A.K. Gupta, learned counsel for the respondents.


weeks and no more time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit,

if any, may be filed by learned counsel for the applicant within two

weeks, thereafter.




Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



T.A. No. 22 of 2016

Lal Chand Ram Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


24.01.2017



Present: Shri R. Chandra, Advocate and Shri Amit Jaiswal,


On call of the case, Shri R. Chandra, Advocate, appears and

states that he will be filing Vakalatnama on behalf of the petitioner.

As prayed by him, two weeks time is granted to file

Vakalatnama. He will also provide Bench Copy of the case on or

before next date.

List this case on 09.02.2017 for admission.



Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



T.A. No. 42 of 2016

Smt. Savitri Devi Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


24.01.2017



Present: None for the petitioner and Shri Virendra Singh, learned


List after two weeks with regard to office report for sufficiency of

service of notice.




Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



T.A. No. 78 of 2016

Mrs. Savitri Bala Mishra Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


24.01.2017



Present: None for the petitioner and Shri Amit Sharma, learned


According to office report, Acknowledgement has been received.

Inspite of service of notice, none appeared for the petitioner.

Since acknowledgement has been received, it is presumed that

notice has been served to the petitioner.

Since, no one appeared inspite of service of notice, Transferred

Application No. 78 of 2016 is dismissed for non prosecution.



Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



T.A. No. 81 of 2016

Kawal Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


24.01.2017



Vakalatnama filed by Shri V.K. Pandey on behalf of applicant is

taken on record. Let his name be shown as counsel for the applicant,

when the case is listed next.

Learned counsel for the applicant prays for and is granted two

weeks’ time to file Bench Copy.




Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



T.A. No. 75 of 2011

Ashok Kumar Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


24.01.2017



Present: Shri Bachchan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner

and Dr Shesh Narain Pandey, learned counsel for the respondents along

with Maj Salen Xaxa, departmental representative.

List this case on 20.02.2017 for further hearing to enable the

learned counsel for the parties to prepare the case. OIC, Legal Cell

shall submit a chart of events with regard to entire episode to include

charges for the offences in question, date of arrest, date of sanction for

arrest and related matter alongwith relevant rules.


Member (A) Member (J) PKG

Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



O.A. No. 297 of 2011 with MA 139 of 2017

Kedar Prasad Mishra Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


24.01.2017



Present: Shri Rakesh Johri, learned counsel for the applicant

and Shri AN Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondents along with

Maj Salen Xaxa, departmental representative.

List this case on 12.05.2017 for further hearing.



Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



O.A. No. 291 of 2015

Hari Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


24.01.2017



Present: Shri OP Kushwaha, learned counsel for the applicant

and Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the respondents

along with Maj Salen Xaxa, departmental representative.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Arguments concluded.

Orders reserved.



Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



T.A. No. 185 of 2009

Vijay Kumar Yadav Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


24.01.2017



Present: Dr Chet Narain Singh, learned counsel for the respondents

along with Maj Salen Xaxa, departmental representative.

On call of the case, it has been informed by the Members of the Bar

that Shri PN Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the applicant has not come to

the Court as he is sick.

List this case on 23.02.2017 for hearing.



Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



T.A. No. 674 of 2010

Smt Kusum Lata Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


24.01.2017



Present: Shri Yashpal Singh, learned counsel for the applicant

and Shri Rajiv Pandey, learned counsel for the respondents along with

Maj Salen Xaxa, departmental representative.

List this case on 22.02.2017 for hearing in Court No.1 (List A).



Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



DY. No. 2553 of 2015 with DY. No. 2706 of 2016 and M.A. No. 245 of 2016

Ram Raj Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the Orders of the Tribunal

Registry

23.01.2017



Present: None appeared for the applicant. Shri Namit Sharma,

learned counsel for the respondents along with Col Kamal Singh,

Departmental Representative.

Advocates are abstaining themselves from judicial work on call

given by the U.P. Bar Council. Accordingly, the case is adjourned for

the day.




Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



EX-A. No. 19 of 2012 with M.A. No. 56 of 2017 (Inre: T.A. No. 67 of 2010)

Jagdish Singh Mahara Applicant


Versus

DG Inf & Others Respondents


Notes of the

Registry


20.01.2017



Present: None appeared for the applicant. Shri AK Gupta,




given by the U.P. Bar Council.

Shri AK Gupta, learned counsel for the respondents prays for

and is granted four weeks further time for compliance of the order

dated 02.11.2010 passed by the Tribunal.




Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



EX-A. No. 16 of 2016 with M.A. No. 2369 of 2016 (Inre: T.A. No. 1284 of 2010)

Amar Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


23.01.2017



Present: None appeared for the applicant. Shri Amit Jaiswal,




given by the U.P. Bar Council

Shri Amit Jaiswal, learned counsel for the respondents states

that the necessary PPO has been issued to the bank concerned.

Accordingly, it is directed that the bank concerned shall release

the amount to the applicant expeditiously say within a month from the

date of presentation of a certified copy of this order.

Subject to the above, this Execution Application is disposed of

accordingly.



Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



EX-A. No. 160 of 2016 with M.A. No. 105 of 2017 & M.A. No. 2767 of 2016

(Inre: O.A. No. 330 of 2012)

Devendra Kumar Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


23.01.2017



Present: None appeared for the applicant. Dr Chet Narain

Singh, learned counsel for the respondents along with Col Kamal Singh,




Dr Chet Narain Singh, learned counsel for the respondents

states that the necessary PPO has been issued to the bank concerned.

Accordingly, it is directed that the bank concerned shall release

the amount to the applicant expeditiously say within a month from the

date of presentation of a certified copy of this order.

Subject to the above, this Execution Application is disposed of

accordingly.



Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



M.A. No. 1774 of 2016

Thiyam Tomba Singh Applicant


Versus

Union of India & Others Respondent

By Legal Practitioner for Respondent

Notes of the

Registry


23.01.2017



Present: None appeared for the applicant. Dr. Shailendra Sharma

Atal, learned counsel for the respondents along with Col Kamal Singh,




the day.

As prayed by the learned counsel for the respondents, list this

case on 16.05.2017 for orders.



Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



M.A. No. 2356 of 2016 with M.A. No. 118 of 2017

(Inre: O.A. No. Nil of 2016)

Rama Shankar Bharti Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


23.01.2017



Present: None appeared for the applicant. Shri AK Sahu, learned

counsel for the respondents along with Col Kamal Singh, Departmental

Representative.



the day.





Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



M.A. No. 2450 of 2016


Smt. Gomati Devi Mother of Late Sanjay Kumar Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


23.01.2017








the day.





Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET





Shatindra Rai Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


23.01.2017








Objection on the application for condonation of delay filed by

the learned counsel for the respondents is taken on record. Replication

to the objection may be filed by the learned counsel for the applicant

within four weeks.




Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET





Kamakhya Harijan Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


23.01.2017



Present: None appeared for the applicant. Shri AK Sahu, learned

counsel for the respondents along with Col Kamal Singh, Departmental

Representative.



the day.




Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



M.A. No. 2566 of 2016


Smt. Kamlesh Kumari Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


23.01.2017



Present: None appeared for the applicant. Ms. Amrita

Chakraborty, learned counsel for the respondents along with Col Kamal

Singh, Departmental Representative.



As prayed by the learned counsel for the respondents, two weeks

further time is granted for filing objection. Replication to the objection may

be filed within two weeks thereafter.




Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



M.A. No. 2567 of 2016


Ravindra Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


23.01.2017



Present: None appeared for the applicant. Shri Ashish Kumar

Singh, learned counsel for the respondents along with Col Kamal Singh,




As prayed by the learned counsel for the respondents, four weeks

further time is granted for filing objection. Replication to the objection may

be filed within two weeks thereafter.




Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET





Ram Pal Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


23.01.2017



Present: None appeared for the parties. Col Kamal Singh,

Departmental Representative is present.



the day.




Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



M.A. No. 2569 of 2016


Subhash Chandra Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


23.01.2017



Present: None appeared for the applicant. Shri Namit Sharma,





the day.




Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET




Smt. Shanti Devi Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


23.01.2017



Present: None for the applicant and Shri R.C. Shukla, learned



weeks’ further time to file objection on application for condonation of

delay. Replication, if any, may be filed by learned counsel for the

applicant within two weeks’, thereafter.




Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET




Rama Kant Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


23.01.2017






weeks’ further time to file objection on application for condonation of

delay. Replication, if any, may be filed by learned counsel for the

applicant within two weeks’, thereafter.




Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



O.A. No. 264 of 2015

Natha Yadav Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


23.01.2017



Present: None for the applicant and Shri Amit Jaiswal, learned




the day.




Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



O.A. No. 41 of 2016

Udai Narain Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


23.01.2017






weeks’ time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may

be filed by learned counsel for the applicant within two weeks’,

thereafter.




Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



O.A. No. 141 of 2016 with M.A. No. 2335 of 2016

Dharam Deo Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


23.01.2017




applicant and Ms. Anju Singh, learned counsel for the respondents.

M.A. No. 2335 of 2016

Counter affidavit filed by learned counsel for the respondents is

taken on record. M.A. aforesaid is disposed of accordingly.

M.A. No. 135 of 2017

Rejoinder affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant is


Pleadings have been exchanged.


On the date fixed, learned counsel for the respondents shall

produce original documents pertaining to the case for perusal of the

Bench.



Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



O.A. No. 222 of 2016

Santosh Kumar Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


23.01.2017



Present: None for the applicant and Shri Namit Sharma, learned




the day.




Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



T.A. No. 41 of 2012

Smt. Indra Kumari Gurung Applicant


Versus

Govt of India MOD & Others Respondents


Notes of the

Registry


23.01.2017







the day.




Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



O.A. No. 18 of 2011

Satyavir Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


23.01.2017






weeks’ further time to file affidavit in terms of earlier order dated

10.11.2016.




Bench.



Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



O.A. No. 125 of 2013

Abhishek Pandey Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


23.01.2017







the day.




Bench.



Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



O.A. No. 211 of 2015

Bhola Dutt Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


23.01.2017







the day.




Bench.



Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



O.A. No. 215 of 2015

Omkar Nath Sharma Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


23.01.2017



Present: Shri R. Chandra, learned counsel for the applicant and

Shri Shyam Singh, learned counsel for the respondents.



the day.




Bench.



Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET




Col S.K. Tiwari Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


23.01.2017



Present: None for the applicant and Col Kamal Singh,

Departmental Representative for the respondents.



the day.




Bench.



Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



T.A. No. 3 of 2016 with M.A. No. 1805 of 2016

Vinod Kumar Tewari Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


23.01.2017







the day.




Bench.



Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



O.A. No. 238 of 2016

Kundan Kumar Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


20.01.2017



O.A. No. 238 of 2016, Kundan Kumar vs. Union of India and

others is allowed.

For order, see our order of date passed on separate sheets.


Member (A) Member (J) Ukt

Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



M.A. No. 155 of 2016

Prathi @ Prithvi Raj Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


20.01.2017



Present: Shri Ashok Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant and

Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, learned counsel for the respondents.

Supplementary Affidavit (Better Affidavit) filed by learned

counsel for the applicant is taken on record.


weeks’ time to file objection. Replication, if any, may be filed by

learned counsel for the applicant within two weeks, thereafter.




Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



M.A. No. 1147 of 2016 with M.A. No. 1431 of 2016 & M.A. No. 119 of 2017

Manoj Kumar Pandey Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


20.01.2017




Maj Salen Xaxa, Departmental Representative for the respondents.

M.A. No. 119 of 2017

Replication to the objection on application for condonation of

delay filed by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record.

The controversy relates to payment of disability pension to the

applicant. Grant of pension is recurring cause of action. The reasons

given in the affidavit filed in support of application for condonation of

delay seem to be genuine. Accordingly, the delay in filing the Original

Application is hereby condoned. Objection raised by the learned

counsel for the respondents is rejected.

Admit.

Let the case be registered as O.A.



be filed by learned counsel for the applicant within two weeks’

thereafter.




Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET




Sawaran Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


20.01.2017



Present: Shri V.K. Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and





within two weeks’ thereafter.




Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET




Kitab Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


20.01.2017



Present: Shri K.K. Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant and

Shri Namit Sharma, learned counsel for the respondents.

As prayed by learned counsel for the applicant, three week’s

further time is granted to file replication to objection on application for

condonation of delay.




Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



O.A. No. 154 of 2016

Shiv Ram Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


20.01.2017





M.A. No. 134 of 2017

Counter affidavit filed by learned counsel for the respondents is


Learned counsel for the applicant prays for and is granted four

weeks’ time to file rejoinder affidavit.




Bench.



Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



T.A. No. 73 of 2016

Gore Lal Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


20.01.2017



Memo of appearance filed by Shri Amit Jaiswal on behalf of

respondents is taken on record. Let his name be shown as counsel for

the respondents, when the case is listed next.

Present: None for the petitioner and Shri Amit Jaiswal, learned


List revised. No one appears for the petitioner.

Let notice be issued to the petitioner to engage a counsel or to

make alternative arrangements to pursue his case.




Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



O.A. No. 65 of 2010

Ganesh Babu K.V. Applicant


Versus



Notes of the Orders of the Tribunal

Registry

20.01.2017



Present: The applicant Shri Ganesh Babu KV in person alongwith

Shri V.K. Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and Dr. Shailendra

Sharma Atal, learned counsel for the respondents.

From perusal of record it transpires that notices have not been

issued to Respondent No 6 and 7.

Let notice be issued to Respondent No 6 and 7 by Registered

Speed Post as well as by Regular Service returnable by 23.02.2017

indicating that counter affidavit shall be filed by them by the date

fixed.


Applicant Ganesh Babu shall again appear on the next date of

hearing.


produce original documents pertaining to case for perusal of the

Bench.



Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



O.A. No. 60 of 2014

Awadhesh Kumar Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


20.01.2017



Present: Shri R. Chandra learned counsel for the applicant and

Maj Salen Xaxa, Departmental Representative for the respondents.

Learned counsel for the applicant prays for and is granted two

weeks’ further time to file rejoinder affidavit.




Bench.



Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



O.A. No. 240 of 2015

Vijay Kumar Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


20.01.2017





On call of the case, none is present on behalf of applicant to press

this case. In the interest of justice, the case is adjourned.




Bench.



Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET




Bal Krishna M Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


20.01.2017



Present: The applicant Shri Bal Krishna M in person and Dr.

Shailendra Sharma Atal, learned counsel for the respondents.

List this case on 02.02.2017 for further hearing alongwith cases

of List B.


produce original documents pertaining to case alongwith policy letter

for perusal of the Bench.



Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET




Radhey Ram Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


20.01.2017



Present: Col Y.R. Sharma (Retd) holding brief of Shri S.P. Singh,

learned counsel for the applicant and Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal,


On call of the case, Col Y.R. Sharma, Advocate states that

learned counsel for the applicant is out of station today and prays for

adjournment of the case. Learned counsel for the respondents has no

objection.

Accordingly, the case is adjourned.




Bench.



Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET




Rajbir Singh Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


20.01.2017



Present: Col Y.R. Sharma (Retd), learned counsel for the

applicant and Shri Amit Jaiswal, learned counsel for the respondents.

M.A. No. 2238 of 2016

Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant

is taken on record. M.A. aforesaid is disposed of accordingly.

Additional counter affidavit filed by learned counsel for the

respondents is taken on record. Learned counsel for the applicant

prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to file additional rejoinder

affidavit.




Bench.



Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



T.A. No. 1234 of 2010

Raj Kumar Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


17.01.2017



Present: None for the applicant and Dr. Chet Narain Singh,


List revised. Neither the applicant nor his counsel is present nor

is there any request to pass over the case.

Accordingly, the case is dismissed for non prosecution.



Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



O.A. No. 153 of 2013

Shriram Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


17.01.2017



Vakalatnama filed by Col Rakesh Johri (Retd) on behalf of

applicant is taken on record.

Present: Col Rakesh Johri (Retd), learned counsel for the

applicant and Ms. Amrita Chakraborty, learned counsel for the

respondents.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Arguments concluded.

Judgment reserved.



Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



O.A. No. 215 of 2015

Omkar Nath Sharma Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


17.01.2017




Shri Shyam Singh, learned counsel for the respondents.

As prayed, put up tomorrow (18.01.2017) in list (B) for hearing.



Bench.



Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



O.A. No. 305 of 2015

Mukesh Kumar Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


17.01.2017



Present: Shri Rohit Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant and

Dr. Chet Narain Singh, learned counsel for the respondents.

As prayed by learned counsel for the applicant, list this case on

13.04.2017 for hearing.



Bench.



Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



O.A. No. 53 of 2016

Surendra Singh Sajwan Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


17.01.2017





On call of the case, Shri Rohit Kumar, Advocate submits that Ms.

Mayuri Sajwan, learned counsel for the applicant has not come to the

court and requested for adjournment of the case.

Accordingly, the case is adjourned.




Bench.



Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



O.A. No. 241 of 2016

Ranjeet Kumar Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


17.01.2017



Present: Shri Rohit Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant and

Shri Amit Jaiswal, learned counsel for the respondents.



be filed by learned counsel for the applicant within two weeks,

thereafter.




Bench.



Form No. 4

[See rule 11(1)]

ORDER SHEET



T.A. No. 77 of 2013

Jainendra Kumar Applicant


Versus



Notes of the

Registry


17.01.2017



Present: Shri V.A. Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and

Shri G.S. Sikarwar, learned counsel for the respondents.

As prayed by learned counsel for the applicant, list this case on

27.01.2017 for hearing.



Bench.



Documents

Form No. 4 [See rule 11(1)] ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES ...aftlko.up.nic.in/C2 Daily Order/c2 Order-2017/c1(b... · Present: Shri V.K. Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and Ashish