www.gfoi.org

GFOI Capacity Building SummitArmenia, Colombia – September 17 to 19, 2014

Forest and Climate Program(WWF International)

Naikoa Aguilar-Amuchastegui PhDMRV Coordinator

(REL, Biodiversity Safeguards)

www.gfoi.org

GFOI Capacity Building SummitArmenia, Colombia – September 17 to 19, 2014

Description of the program objectives/timeframe/geographical area

PeruMadre de Dios Region

DRCMai Ndombe Province

IndonesiaKutai Barat District

GuyanaLow Carbon Development Strategy

WWF Focal REDD+ jurisdiction

Other WWF REDD+ activities

ColombiaPutumayo Department

BrazilAcre State

NepalTerai Arc

www.gfoi.org

SDCG-4, Caltech, CA, USA4th-6th September 2013

Capacity development and

knowledge sharing

Faster international and national enabling

conditions for REDD+

Catalyze REDD+ at Scale in WWF priority Forest

Countries

Build & Share MRV Know-How• Holistic approach to MRV– CMRV links to NMRV & SIS

– Green development M&E– Biodiversity Safeguards

• Links between WWF and national/regional processes/

communities– Political and institutional frameworks

• Help build synergies among ongoing processes

• South-South collaboration• www.reddcommunity.org

• Long term capacity• Direct support

• R&D

Connecting the dots!!!!

POLICY

CAPACITY

IMPLEMENTATION

Figuring out what works…with MRVers on the ground.• Remember the Reporting

Framework (connect the dots)• Good enough approaches that

deliver (no overkill)

www.gfoi.org

GFOI Capacity Building SummitArmenia, Colombia – September 17 to 19, 2014

Key activities by region

PeruER-PIN, REL

DRCMai Ndombe ProvinceER-PIN, REL, NMRV, CMRV

IndonesiaKutai Barat District, ER-PIN, REL, CMRV

GuyanaLow Carbon Development Strategy, NMRV, CMRV

WWF Focal REDD+ jurisdiction

Other WWF REDD+ activities

ColombiaNMRV approaches/RELGreen velopment plans

BrazilAcre StateREL, CMRV

NepalREL/ ER-PIN

www.gfoi.org

GFOI Capacity Building SummitArmenia, Colombia – September 17 to 19, 2014

Challenges• How to deliver long lasting capacity as opposed

to products– Project based approach vs.

Institutionalization of MRV– Academic approach towards building

capacity?• R&D ≠ capacity building….we need the

teachers• Cutting edge vs. Established methods. (next)

• Non-access to the data (intermediate prods)

– Technology packages vs real country needs

• Interpretation of UNFCCC mandate– Transparent– Robust**– Accurate**– Replicable– Verifiable

Legitim

acy

• The rise of CMRV (NMRV-CMRV-FPIC)• Information flow:

– lack of transparency – Only in one direction

• Acknowledge limitations: “Hey this is what we have, we know its limitations

and propose to use it this way”• Lack of humility: RS can only go as far….• ACTIVITY DATA (RS is not a source of

activity data)

• The a need of a broader base of expertise

• We have come full circle: The forest for the trees…again Trees have the right to die! Natural dynamics Structural heterogeneity dynamics Noise in the data The non use of a significant MMU The pixel for the MMU

Need guidance on criteria for

this!!!

www.gfoi.org

SDCG-4, Caltech, CA, USA4th-6th September 2013

Following on Simon’s point on R&D

Needs for developing capacity• Process based support rather than

product based.• Long-term financing mechanisms

– Not project based– Linked with institutional

development

• Govts need to do the homework– Institutional arrangements– Their own strategies for capacity

• Develop clear criteria for supporting agents: CONSOLIDATING– Develop clear a clear strategy (WWF

& Redd Academy)– Academia as in Educating

• Maintaining Capacities

– Emphasize service providers with necessary structure and logistics for long term support.

• R&D need to be separated from support for establishing well known alternatives

• We need to make this thing SIMPLER not more complicated

– Any dataset can be used adequately, in a legitimate way

– Not generate non based expectations– Figure out how to live with uncertainty in a

legitimate way• Meet Countries real needs: Connect the dots!

(donors talking to each other)• The rise of CMRV (NMRV-CMRV-FPIC-SIS)

Better activity data! Better interpretation of RS data Better context for understanding what we see