Foreign Demand for Domestic Currency and Optimal Rate of Inflation v1

  • Upload
    xmen24

  • View
    221

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/8/2019 Foreign Demand for Domestic Currency and Optimal Rate of Inflation v1

    1/4

    1

    Introduction

    More than half of US Currency circulates abroad. As of December 2005, about $450 billion

    of the $760 billion of US banknotes were held in other countries.

    In absence of a foreign demand for local currency, the welfare maximizing optimal rate of

    inflation follows the Friedman rule. Friedman rule is based on the idea that in the long run

    inflation is a monetary phenomenon. The opportunity cost of holding money should equal

    the social cost of creating additional fiat money. It is assumed that, since the marginal cost

    of creating additional money is approximately zero, this opportunity cost; also the nominal

    rates of interest should be zero.

    Fishers rule says:

    Nominal Interest rate = Real Interest Rate + Expected Inflation

    if Nominal Interest Rate is 0,

    Expected inflation = - Real Interest Rate

    Analytically, this can be shown to be optimal in the absence of foreign demand for

    domestic currency. However, the results are different when there is a substantial foreign

    demand. Optimal rates of Inflation have been observed to be anywhere from 2-10%.

    In this paper, the authors first present a dynamic monetary model with a foreign demand for

    domestic currency, and then establish the optimality and failure of Friedman rule in the

    corresponding absence and presence of the foreign demand of domestic currency. They

    further go on to show that under plausible conditions, sizable (2-10%) deviation can bejustified from the inflation associated with Friedmans rule.

    USDCirculation

    In 2005, $450 billion

    of the $760 billion of

    US banknotes were

    held in other

    countries.

    FriedmansRule

    Central bank should

    seek a rate of

    deflation equal to

    the real interest

    rate on government

    bonds and other safe

    assets, to make the

    nominal interest rate

    zero.

    Foreign Demand for Domestic Currency and Optimal rateof inflation

    About the following paper

    Summarized By: Anoj Ramasamy Sundar (HT094307J)

    NBER Working Paper: 15494

    Authors: Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe and Martin Uribe

    Paper title: Foreign Demand for domestic Currency and Optimal Rate of Inflation

    Published on: November 2009

    1

  • 8/8/2019 Foreign Demand for Domestic Currency and Optimal Rate of Inflation v1

    2/4

    2

    The Model and the Dynamic Ramsey Equilibrium

    Consider an economy populated by large number of identical households. Each household

    has preferences defined over sequences of consumption (ct) and effort (ht) choices in a

    time discounted aggregate utility function, over an infinite time horizon.

    The single period utility, U is increasing in consumption and decreasing in effort (more

    work, less leisure), and strictly concave. Nominal money holdings Mtd

    is also the money

    supply that facilitates domestic consumption purchases in the economy at any time period.

    Since money can be reused for transactions, we will also define Money velocity (vtd) and

    transaction cost s(vt) that decreases with increasing money velocity.

    Households invest in one-period nominal bonds Bt at a nominal interest rate of Rt.Households supply labor at a real wage rate (wt), and receive profit t from ownership of

    firms, and pay income taxes at flat rate of t. To prevent households from engaging in

    Ponzi-type schemes, a restriction is placed such that in long run, net nominal liabilities grow

    at a rate smaller than the nominal interest rate. Thus, households cannot roll over their

    debts forever.

    In this model, Households have to choose sequences of choices {consumption, work hours,

    money velocity, Nominal money supply and Bonds} at each time period, given sequences

    of {Prices, Taxes, Interest Rates, Profits}

    Final good are assumed to be produced by competitive firms using the Technology F(h t) i.e.

    only labor as the factor of production. Firms will choose labor input to maximize their profit.

    Now, let us bring in foreign demand for domestic money (Mtf) and Government actions.

    Government prints money (for Domestic Mtd

    and Foreign Mtfdemand), issues nominal, one-

    period bonds and levies taxes to finance an exogenous stream of public consumption g t

    and interest obligations on outstanding public debts.

    A competitive Ramsey equilibrium is thus a set of sequences of choices {money velocities

    domestic and foreign use, wages, consumption, work hours, domestic and foreign

    demand for local money, Bonds issued by govt. and Prices} over an infinite time horizon.

    Combining households and governments sequential budget constraints (described above)

    also makes it clear that domestic economy collects seignorage revenue from foreigners

    whenever nominal balances held by foreigners increase.

    MoneyVelocity

    Average frequency

    with which a unit of

    money is spent in a

    specific period of time

    SeignorageRevenue

    Difference between

    interests earned on

    securities acquired in

    exchange for bank

    notes and the actual

    costs of producing

    and distributing those

    notes

    2

  • 8/8/2019 Foreign Demand for Domestic Currency and Optimal Rate of Inflation v1

    3/4

    3

    3

    Solving the Dynamic Ramsey Problem

    The government is assumed to be benevolent towards domestic residents. This means that

    welfare function of government coincides with the welfare function of the domestic

    households and is independent of the interests and preferences of foreign residents. We fix

    the initial price level arbitrarily. Ramsey problem consists in choosing a set of sequences of

    {consumption, work hours and money velocity} to maximize households utility function

    subject to constraints defined in the primal form.

    Solving the maximization problem, we can conclude that in case of no foreign demand for

    domestic currency, if Ramsey equilibrium exists, it is at zero nominal interest rate.

    Failure of Friedman Rule

    Without going into the technical aspects of the derivation, let us try to think why, in presence

    of foreign demand for domestic currency (Mf> 0), Friedman rule ceases to be Ramsey

    optimal. The intuition is based on the fact that at negative inflation (consistent with

    Friedmans rule), foreign money holdings increase in real value as price levels fall, resulting

    in welfare transfer from domestic to foreign consumers. Levying a positive inflation to tax

    these foreign money holdings, also taxes domestic consumers with a domestic welfare loss

    due to increased transaction costs. Thus the Ramsey planner faces this tradeoff of setting an

    inflation rate above Friedmans rule and still maximizing domestic welfare.

    Quantifying Deviation from Friedmans rule

    Schmitt-Grohe and Uribe, developed a numerical algorithm that delivers the exact solutions

    to the steady state of Ramsey equilibrium which addresses the planners tradeoffs. In this

    calibrated model, when foreign demand is nil, inflation is -3.85, income tax rate is 18% and

    nominal interest rate is 0, consistent with Friedmans rule. As foreign demand increases,

    Friedmans rule is no longer optimum. For a foreign demand of 22% of total money, inflation

    is 2.1% and nominal interest rate is 6.18%. As foreign demand rises as high as 32%, Inflation

    targets reach 10.5% with a corresponding reduction in income tax rates.

    This optimality solution suggests that benefit from collecting an inflation tax appears to

    strongly dominate inflation costs to domestic agents.

    Optimal Rateof Inflation

    In absence of Foreign

    Demand, follows

    Friedmans rule

    In presence of

    significant Foreign

    demand, is observed

    to be 2-10%

    3

  • 8/8/2019 Foreign Demand for Domestic Currency and Optimal Rate of Inflation v1

    4/4

    4

    Conclusion

    A significant foreign demand for domestic currency, as seen for the U.S. dollar, can

    incentivize monetary authority to generate positive rates of inflation. This acts as a tax to

    extract real resources from rest of the world towards domestic consumption. In our model, the

    Ramsey planner weights this incentive against the cost that inflation causes to domestichouseholds. In absence of a foreign demand, Ramsey-optimal policy calls for adopting

    Friedmans rule i.e. deflating at the real rate of interest. For plausible calibrations of our

    model, this tradeoff is resolved in favor of taxing foreign holdings of domestic currency at

    rates ranging from 2-10% per year

    Word Count

    [Submission details] 36 words[Article] 1050 words[Side bars] 90 words

    4