21
Protecting our children, families and future Sibling Placement Report Data in the report (both historical and current) may be subject to change as it is continually being validated and updated. This may result in statistical data in previous reports to be inconsistent with statistics found in more recent reports even when the data pertain to the same time period. Prepared by Office of Data Management,Reports and Analysis April 06, 2016 Report Version V2.0 Source: MAGIK Monthly Data Department Of Child Services Practice Indicator Sibling Placement Report For February 2016

For February 2016 - inFebruary 2016 Region County Name Count of Sibling Cases Cases With Children Not Placed Together Cases With All Children Placed Together Percent Placed Together

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: For February 2016 - inFebruary 2016 Region County Name Count of Sibling Cases Cases With Children Not Placed Together Cases With All Children Placed Together Percent Placed Together

Protecting our children, families and future

Sibling Placement Report

Data in the report (both historical and current) may be subject to change as it is continually being validated and updated. This may result in statistical data in previous reports to be inconsistent with statistics found in more recent reports even when the data pertain to the same time period.

Prepared by Office of Data Management,Reports and AnalysisApril 06, 2016

Report Version V2.0Source:MAGIK Monthly Data

Department Of Child Services Practice Indicator Sibling Placement ReportFor February 2016

Page 2: For February 2016 - inFebruary 2016 Region County Name Count of Sibling Cases Cases With Children Not Placed Together Cases With All Children Placed Together Percent Placed Together

February 2016Region County Name Count of Sibling

CasesCases With

Children Not Placed Together

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of

Children per Case

Statewide All 4393 1227 3166 72.1% 2.68

1 All 440 147 293 66.6% 2.97

Lake 440 147 293 66.6% 2.97

Month Count of Sibling Cases

Cases With Placement Exceptions

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of Children per

Case

February 2016 440 147 293 66.6% 3.0

January 2016 451 147 304 67.4% 3.0

December 2015 453 146 307 67.8% 3.0

November 2015 472 148 324 68.6% 3.0

October 2015 472 146 326 69.1% 3.0

September 2015 474 138 336 70.9% 3.0

August 2015 475 137 338 71.2% 3.0

July 2015 463 137 326 70.4% 3.0

June 2015 460 132 328 71.3% 3.0

May 2015 460 137 323 70.2% 3.1

April 2015 454 139 315 69.4% 3.1

March 2015 456 137 319 70.0% 3.1

February 2015 446 132 314 70.4% 3.1

Region 1 For February 2015 to February 2016

Prepared by Office of Data Management,Reports and AnalysisApril 06, 2016

Report Version V2.0Source:MAGIK Monthly Data

Department Of Child Services Practice Indicator Sibling Placement ReportFor February 2016

Page 3: For February 2016 - inFebruary 2016 Region County Name Count of Sibling Cases Cases With Children Not Placed Together Cases With All Children Placed Together Percent Placed Together

February 2016Region County Name Count of Sibling

CasesCases With

Children Not Placed Together

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of

Children per Case

Statewide All 4393 1227 3166 72.1% 2.68

2 All 142 35 107 75.4% 2.69

Jasper 16 3 13 81.3% 2.44

Laporte 53 10 43 81.1% 2.77

Newton 8 3 5 62.5% 3.00

Porter 40 11 29 72.5% 2.75

Pulaski 7 2 5 71.4% 2.43

Starke 18 6 12 66.7% 2.50

Month Count of Sibling Cases

Cases With Placement Exceptions

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of Children per

Case

February 2016 142 35 107 75.4% 2.7

January 2016 138 34 104 75.4% 2.7

December 2015 134 35 99 73.9% 2.7

November 2015 127 32 95 74.8% 2.7

October 2015 131 30 101 77.1% 2.7

September 2015 116 28 88 75.9% 2.7

August 2015 115 27 88 76.5% 2.6

July 2015 113 24 89 78.8% 2.6

June 2015 102 22 80 78.4% 2.6

May 2015 100 20 80 80.0% 2.6

April 2015 96 17 79 82.3% 2.6

March 2015 89 16 73 82.0% 2.7

February 2015 91 18 73 80.2% 2.7

Region 2 For February 2015 to February 2016

Prepared by Office of Data Management,Reports and AnalysisApril 06, 2016

Report Version V2.0Source:MAGIK Monthly Data

Department Of Child Services Practice Indicator Sibling Placement ReportFor February 2016

Page 4: For February 2016 - inFebruary 2016 Region County Name Count of Sibling Cases Cases With Children Not Placed Together Cases With All Children Placed Together Percent Placed Together

February 2016Region County Name Count of Sibling

CasesCases With

Children Not Placed Together

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of

Children per Case

Statewide All 4393 1227 3166 72.1% 2.68

3 All 197 67 130 66% 2.72

Elkhart 53 16 37 69.8% 2.83

Kosciusko 17 3 14 82.4% 2.29

Marshall 9 1 8 88.9% 2.44

Saint Joseph 118 47 71 60.2% 2.75

Month Count of Sibling Cases

Cases With Placement Exceptions

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of Children per

Case

February 2016 197 67 130 66.0% 2.7

January 2016 200 65 135 67.5% 2.7

December 2015 200 65 135 67.5% 2.7

November 2015 211 68 143 67.8% 2.7

October 2015 207 63 144 69.6% 2.8

September 2015 218 62 156 71.6% 2.8

August 2015 213 60 153 71.8% 2.8

July 2015 208 53 155 74.5% 2.8

June 2015 207 51 156 75.4% 2.8

May 2015 197 53 144 73.1% 2.9

April 2015 192 55 137 71.4% 2.9

March 2015 205 50 155 75.6% 2.8

February 2015 208 47 161 77.4% 2.8

Region 3 For February 2015 to February 2016

Prepared by Office of Data Management,Reports and AnalysisApril 06, 2016

Report Version V2.0Source:MAGIK Monthly Data

Department Of Child Services Practice Indicator Sibling Placement ReportFor February 2016

Page 5: For February 2016 - inFebruary 2016 Region County Name Count of Sibling Cases Cases With Children Not Placed Together Cases With All Children Placed Together Percent Placed Together

February 2016Region County Name Count of Sibling

CasesCases With

Children Not Placed Together

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of

Children per Case

Statewide All 4393 1227 3166 72.1% 2.68

4 All 419 132 287 68.5% 2.82

Adams 21 5 16 76.2% 2.48

Allen 252 89 163 64.7% 2.93

Dekalb 22 4 18 81.8% 2.82

Huntington 17 5 12 70.6% 2.53

LaGrange 11 2 9 81.8% 2.45

Noble 25 5 20 80.0% 2.72

Steuben 20 5 15 75.0% 2.65

Wells 31 11 20 64.5% 2.68

Whitley 20 6 14 70.0% 2.85

Month Count of Sibling Cases

Cases With Placement Exceptions

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of Children per

Case

February 2016 419 132 287 68.5% 2.8

January 2016 430 134 296 68.8% 2.8

December 2015 432 133 299 69.2% 2.8

November 2015 430 132 298 69.3% 2.8

October 2015 418 127 291 69.6% 2.8

September 2015 415 128 287 69.2% 2.8

August 2015 409 130 279 68.2% 2.8

July 2015 396 130 266 67.2% 2.8

June 2015 389 116 273 70.2% 2.8

May 2015 376 107 269 71.5% 2.7

April 2015 371 105 266 71.7% 2.7

Region 4 For February 2015 to February 2016

Return to PI_Sibling_Placement_Report

Prepared by Office of Data Management,Reports and AnalysisApril 08, 2016

Report Version V2.0Source:MAGIK Monthly Data

Department Of Child Services Practice Indicator Sibling Placement ReportFor February 2016

Page 6: For February 2016 - inFebruary 2016 Region County Name Count of Sibling Cases Cases With Children Not Placed Together Cases With All Children Placed Together Percent Placed Together

March 2015 373 104 269 72.1% 2.8

February 2015 360 96 264 73.3% 2.8

Prepared by Office of Data Management,Reports and AnalysisApril 08, 2016

Report Version V2.0Source:MAGIK Monthly Data

Department Of Child Services Practice Indicator Sibling Placement ReportFor February 2016

Page 7: For February 2016 - inFebruary 2016 Region County Name Count of Sibling Cases Cases With Children Not Placed Together Cases With All Children Placed Together Percent Placed Together

February 2016Region County Name Count of Sibling

CasesCases With

Children Not Placed Together

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of

Children per Case

Statewide All 4393 1227 3166 72.1% 2.68

5 All 156 47 109 69.9% 2.47

Benton 1 0 1 100.0% 2.00

Carroll 12 2 10 83.3% 2.17

Clinton 18 8 10 55.6% 2.61

Fountain 14 3 11 78.6% 2.36

Tippecanoe 85 31 54 63.5% 2.55

Warren 2 0 2 100.0% 2.00

White 24 3 21 87.5% 2.33

Month Count of Sibling Cases

Cases With Placement Exceptions

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of Children per

Case

February 2016 156 47 109 69.9% 2.5

January 2016 156 49 107 68.6% 2.5

December 2015 149 47 102 68.5% 2.5

November 2015 150 47 103 68.7% 2.5

October 2015 149 46 103 69.1% 2.5

September 2015 141 36 105 74.5% 2.5

August 2015 143 38 105 73.4% 2.5

July 2015 146 38 108 74.0% 2.5

June 2015 143 36 107 74.8% 2.5

May 2015 140 33 107 76.4% 2.5

April 2015 143 34 109 76.2% 2.5

March 2015 143 32 111 77.6% 2.5

February 2015 127 27 100 78.7% 2.5

Region 5 For February 2015 to February 2016

Return to PI_Sibling_Placement_Report

Prepared by Office of Data Management,Reports and AnalysisApril 08, 2016

Report Version V2.0Source:MAGIK Monthly Data

Department Of Child Services Practice Indicator Sibling Placement ReportFor February 2016

Page 8: For February 2016 - inFebruary 2016 Region County Name Count of Sibling Cases Cases With Children Not Placed Together Cases With All Children Placed Together Percent Placed Together

February 2016Region County Name Count of Sibling

CasesCases With

Children Not Placed Together

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of

Children per Case

Statewide All 4393 1227 3166 72.1% 2.68

6 All 156 38 118 75.6% 2.56

Cass 22 4 18 81.8% 2.91

Fulton 15 5 10 66.7% 2.73

Howard 57 13 44 77.2% 2.44

Miami 32 9 23 71.9% 2.47

Wabash 30 7 23 76.7% 2.53

Month Count of Sibling Cases

Cases With Placement Exceptions

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of Children per

Case

February 2016 156 38 118 75.6% 2.6

January 2016 157 38 119 75.8% 2.5

December 2015 154 40 114 74.0% 2.5

November 2015 146 36 110 75.3% 2.5

October 2015 141 37 104 73.8% 2.5

September 2015 139 37 102 73.4% 2.5

August 2015 135 36 99 73.3% 2.6

July 2015 123 36 87 70.7% 2.6

June 2015 122 34 88 72.1% 2.5

May 2015 126 36 90 71.4% 2.5

April 2015 130 36 94 72.3% 2.5

March 2015 127 35 92 72.4% 2.6

February 2015 131 37 94 71.8% 2.5

Region 6 For February 2015 to February 2016

Return to PI_Sibling_Placement_Report

Prepared by Office of Data Management,Reports and AnalysisApril 08, 2016

Report Version V2.0Source:MAGIK Monthly Data

Department Of Child Services Practice Indicator Sibling Placement ReportFor February 2016

Page 9: For February 2016 - inFebruary 2016 Region County Name Count of Sibling Cases Cases With Children Not Placed Together Cases With All Children Placed Together Percent Placed Together

February 2016Region County Name Count of Sibling

CasesCases With

Children Not Placed Together

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of

Children per Case

Statewide All 4393 1227 3166 72.1% 2.68

7 All 133 28 105 78.9% 2.58

Blackford 14 2 12 85.7% 2.36

Delaware 66 12 54 81.8% 2.58

Grant 37 12 25 67.6% 2.76

Jay 6 0 6 100.0% 2.50

Randolph 10 2 8 80.0% 2.30

Month Count of Sibling Cases

Cases With Placement Exceptions

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of Children per

Case

February 2016 133 28 105 78.9% 2.6

January 2016 134 30 104 77.6% 2.6

December 2015 126 30 96 76.2% 2.6

November 2015 124 31 93 75.0% 2.6

October 2015 125 29 96 76.8% 2.6

September 2015 120 27 93 77.5% 2.6

August 2015 116 28 88 75.9% 2.7

July 2015 110 28 82 74.5% 2.6

June 2015 113 28 85 75.2% 2.6

May 2015 114 30 84 73.7% 2.6

April 2015 114 32 82 71.9% 2.6

March 2015 116 31 85 73.3% 2.6

February 2015 112 33 79 70.5% 2.7

Region 7 For February 2015 to February 2016

Return to PI_Sibling_Placement_Report

Prepared by Office of Data Management,Reports and AnalysisApril 08, 2016

Report Version V2.0Source:MAGIK Monthly Data

Department Of Child Services Practice Indicator Sibling Placement ReportFor February 2016

Page 10: For February 2016 - inFebruary 2016 Region County Name Count of Sibling Cases Cases With Children Not Placed Together Cases With All Children Placed Together Percent Placed Together

February 2016Region County Name Count of Sibling

CasesCases With

Children Not Placed Together

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of

Children per Case

Statewide All 4393 1227 3166 72.1% 2.68

8 All 135 29 106 78.5% 2.62

Clay 17 6 11 64.7% 3.12

Parke 4 0 4 100.0% 2.75

Sullivan 12 2 10 83.3% 2.33

Vermillion 19 8 11 57.9% 2.68

Vigo 83 13 70 84.3% 2.54

Month Count of Sibling Cases

Cases With Placement Exceptions

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of Children per

Case

February 2016 135 29 106 78.5% 2.6

January 2016 132 25 107 81.1% 2.7

December 2015 129 25 104 80.6% 2.6

November 2015 127 28 99 78.0% 2.7

October 2015 125 26 99 79.2% 2.7

September 2015 123 25 98 79.7% 2.6

August 2015 120 24 96 80.0% 2.6

July 2015 128 24 104 81.3% 2.6

June 2015 132 26 106 80.3% 2.5

May 2015 130 30 100 76.9% 2.5

April 2015 138 30 108 78.3% 2.6

March 2015 139 29 110 79.1% 2.6

February 2015 133 25 108 81.2% 2.6

Region 8 For February 2015 to February 2016

Return to PI_Sibling_Placement_Report

Prepared by Office of Data Management,Reports and AnalysisApril 08, 2016

Report Version V2.0Source:MAGIK Monthly Data

Department Of Child Services Practice Indicator Sibling Placement ReportFor February 2016

Page 11: For February 2016 - inFebruary 2016 Region County Name Count of Sibling Cases Cases With Children Not Placed Together Cases With All Children Placed Together Percent Placed Together

February 2016Region County Name Count of Sibling

CasesCases With

Children Not Placed Together

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of

Children per Case

Statewide All 4393 1227 3166 72.1% 2.68

9 All 138 29 109 79% 2.49

Boone 12 2 10 83.3% 2.50

Hendricks 20 4 16 80.0% 2.50

Montgomery 32 6 26 81.3% 2.38

Morgan 43 12 31 72.1% 2.53

Putnam 31 5 26 83.9% 2.55

Month Count of Sibling Cases

Cases With Placement Exceptions

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of Children per

Case

February 2016 138 29 109 79.0% 2.5

January 2016 132 29 103 78.0% 2.5

December 2015 125 27 98 78.4% 2.5

November 2015 127 20 107 84.3% 2.5

October 2015 125 18 107 85.6% 2.5

September 2015 116 16 100 86.2% 2.5

August 2015 110 15 95 86.4% 2.5

July 2015 106 23 83 78.3% 2.5

June 2015 99 23 76 76.8% 2.5

May 2015 95 21 74 77.9% 2.5

April 2015 96 21 75 78.1% 2.5

March 2015 91 22 69 75.8% 2.5

February 2015 95 24 71 74.7% 2.4

Region 9 For February 2015 to February 2016

Return to PI_Sibling_Placement_Report

Prepared by Office of Data Management,Reports and AnalysisApril 08, 2016

Report Version V2.0Source:MAGIK Monthly Data

Department Of Child Services Practice Indicator Sibling Placement ReportFor February 2016

Page 12: For February 2016 - inFebruary 2016 Region County Name Count of Sibling Cases Cases With Children Not Placed Together Cases With All Children Placed Together Percent Placed Together

February 2016Region County Name Count of Sibling

CasesCases With

Children Not Placed Together

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of

Children per Case

Statewide All 4393 1227 3166 72.1% 2.68

10 All 1017 311 706 69.4% 2.68

Marion 1017 311 706 69.4% 2.68

Month Count of Sibling Cases

Cases With Placement Exceptions

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of Children per

Case

February 2016 1017 311 706 69.4% 2.7

January 2016 1009 305 704 69.8% 2.7

December 2015 981 303 678 69.1% 2.7

November 2015 986 294 692 70.2% 2.7

October 2015 1004 306 698 69.5% 2.7

September 2015 1002 304 698 69.7% 2.7

August 2015 997 295 702 70.4% 2.7

July 2015 982 292 690 70.3% 2.7

June 2015 964 296 668 69.3% 2.7

May 2015 972 295 677 69.7% 2.7

April 2015 955 284 671 70.3% 2.7

March 2015 935 263 672 71.9% 2.7

February 2015 903 255 648 71.8% 2.7

Region 10 For February 2015 to February 2016

Return to PI_Sibling_Placement_Report

Prepared by Office of Data Management,Reports and AnalysisApril 08, 2016

Report Version V2.0Source:MAGIK Monthly Data

Department Of Child Services Practice Indicator Sibling Placement ReportFor February 2016

Page 13: For February 2016 - inFebruary 2016 Region County Name Count of Sibling Cases Cases With Children Not Placed Together Cases With All Children Placed Together Percent Placed Together

February 2016Region County Name Count of Sibling

CasesCases With

Children Not Placed Together

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of

Children per Case

Statewide All 4393 1227 3166 72.1% 2.68

11 All 213 61 152 71.4% 2.67

Hamilton 34 11 23 67.6% 2.59

Hancock 22 5 17 77.3% 2.50

Madison 144 42 102 70.8% 2.74

Tipton 13 3 10 76.9% 2.31

Month Count of Sibling Cases

Cases With Placement Exceptions

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of Children per

Case

February 2016 213 61 152 71.4% 2.7

January 2016 211 57 154 73.0% 2.7

December 2015 214 58 156 72.9% 2.7

November 2015 214 60 154 72.0% 2.7

October 2015 204 54 150 73.5% 2.7

September 2015 198 52 146 73.7% 2.6

August 2015 192 51 141 73.4% 2.6

July 2015 177 48 129 72.9% 2.6

June 2015 175 45 130 74.3% 2.6

May 2015 171 47 124 72.5% 2.6

April 2015 164 49 115 70.1% 2.6

March 2015 161 48 113 70.2% 2.6

February 2015 147 44 103 70.1% 2.6

Region 11 For February 2015 to February 2016

Return to PI_Sibling_Placement_Report

Prepared by Office of Data Management,Reports and AnalysisApril 08, 2016

Report Version V2.0Source:MAGIK Monthly Data

Department Of Child Services Practice Indicator Sibling Placement ReportFor February 2016

Page 14: For February 2016 - inFebruary 2016 Region County Name Count of Sibling Cases Cases With Children Not Placed Together Cases With All Children Placed Together Percent Placed Together

February 2016Region County Name Count of Sibling

CasesCases With

Children Not Placed Together

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of

Children per Case

Statewide All 4393 1227 3166 72.1% 2.68

12 All 131 18 113 86.3% 2.53

Fayette 27 6 21 77.8% 2.30

Franklin 15 3 12 80.0% 2.67

Henry 36 4 32 88.9% 2.50

Rush 13 2 11 84.6% 2.85

Union 5 1 4 80.0% 2.40

Wayne 35 2 33 94.3% 2.57

Month Count of Sibling Cases

Cases With Placement Exceptions

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of Children per

Case

February 2016 131 18 113 86.3% 2.5

January 2016 131 19 112 85.5% 2.5

December 2015 130 18 112 86.2% 2.5

November 2015 124 20 104 83.9% 2.5

October 2015 130 22 108 83.1% 2.5

September 2015 122 19 103 84.4% 2.5

August 2015 111 15 96 86.5% 2.4

July 2015 111 13 98 88.3% 2.4

June 2015 104 14 90 86.5% 2.5

May 2015 87 15 72 82.8% 2.4

April 2015 78 14 64 82.1% 2.5

March 2015 73 13 60 82.2% 2.5

February 2015 71 15 56 78.9% 2.5

Region 12 For February 2015 to February 2016

Return to PI_Sibling_Placement_Report

Prepared by Office of Data Management,Reports and AnalysisApril 08, 2016

Report Version V2.0Source:MAGIK Monthly Data

Department Of Child Services Practice Indicator Sibling Placement ReportFor February 2016

Page 15: For February 2016 - inFebruary 2016 Region County Name Count of Sibling Cases Cases With Children Not Placed Together Cases With All Children Placed Together Percent Placed Together

February 2016Region County Name Count of Sibling

CasesCases With

Children Not Placed Together

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of

Children per Case

Statewide All 4393 1227 3166 72.1% 2.68

13 All 171 48 123 71.9% 2.66

Brown 7 1 6 85.7% 2.29

Greene 18 1 17 94.4% 2.67

Lawrence 40 14 26 65.0% 2.73

Monroe 72 20 52 72.2% 2.63

Owen 34 12 22 64.7% 2.74

Month Count of Sibling Cases

Cases With Placement Exceptions

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of Children per

Case

February 2016 171 48 123 71.9% 2.7

January 2016 167 49 118 70.7% 2.7

December 2015 168 47 121 72.0% 2.7

November 2015 162 45 117 72.2% 2.7

October 2015 168 47 121 72.0% 2.7

September 2015 167 47 120 71.9% 2.7

August 2015 156 41 115 73.7% 2.7

July 2015 156 46 110 70.5% 2.7

June 2015 152 45 107 70.4% 2.6

May 2015 151 46 105 69.5% 2.7

April 2015 144 46 98 68.1% 2.7

March 2015 134 43 91 67.9% 2.6

February 2015 127 39 88 69.3% 2.6

Region 13 For February 2015 to February 2016

Return to PI_Sibling_Placement_Report

Prepared by Office of Data Management,Reports and AnalysisApril 08, 2016

Report Version V2.0Source:MAGIK Monthly Data

Department Of Child Services Practice Indicator Sibling Placement ReportFor February 2016

Page 16: For February 2016 - inFebruary 2016 Region County Name Count of Sibling Cases Cases With Children Not Placed Together Cases With All Children Placed Together Percent Placed Together

February 2016Region County Name Count of Sibling

CasesCases With

Children Not Placed Together

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of

Children per Case

Statewide All 4393 1227 3166 72.1% 2.68

14 All 208 48 160 76.9% 2.60

Bartholomew 83 25 58 69.9% 2.54

Jackson 27 7 20 74.1% 2.70

Jennings 55 9 46 83.6% 2.76

Johnson 28 5 23 82.1% 2.46

Shelby 15 2 13 86.7% 2.40

Month Count of Sibling Cases

Cases With Placement Exceptions

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of Children per

Case

February 2016 208 48 160 76.9% 2.6

January 2016 214 53 161 75.2% 2.6

December 2015 212 49 163 76.9% 2.6

November 2015 217 50 167 77.0% 2.6

October 2015 224 51 173 77.2% 2.6

September 2015 222 48 174 78.4% 2.5

August 2015 218 48 170 78.0% 2.5

July 2015 221 54 167 75.6% 2.5

June 2015 217 57 160 73.7% 2.6

May 2015 219 54 165 75.3% 2.6

April 2015 212 53 159 75.0% 2.5

March 2015 207 54 153 73.9% 2.5

February 2015 202 53 149 73.8% 2.5

Region 14 For February 2015 to February 2016

Return to PI_Sibling_Placement_Report

Prepared by Office of Data Management,Reports and AnalysisApril 08, 2016

Report Version V2.0Source:MAGIK Monthly Data

Department Of Child Services Practice Indicator Sibling Placement ReportFor February 2016

Page 17: For February 2016 - inFebruary 2016 Region County Name Count of Sibling Cases Cases With Children Not Placed Together Cases With All Children Placed Together Percent Placed Together

February 2016Region County Name Count of Sibling

CasesCases With

Children Not Placed Together

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of

Children per Case

Statewide All 4393 1227 3166 72.1% 2.68

15 All 109 32 77 70.6% 2.47

Dearborn 35 11 24 68.6% 2.46

Decatur 26 7 19 73.1% 2.42

Jefferson 29 7 22 75.9% 2.31

Ohio 6 1 5 83.3% 2.67

Ripley 11 5 6 54.5% 2.91

Switzerland 2 1 1 50.0% 2.50

Month Count of Sibling Cases

Cases With Placement Exceptions

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of Children per

Case

February 2016 109 32 77 70.6% 2.5

January 2016 99 28 71 71.7% 2.5

December 2015 97 29 68 70.1% 2.5

November 2015 91 27 64 70.3% 2.5

October 2015 91 27 64 70.3% 2.5

September 2015 86 28 58 67.4% 2.4

August 2015 82 25 57 69.5% 2.4

July 2015 76 25 51 67.1% 2.4

June 2015 70 24 46 65.7% 2.5

May 2015 72 23 49 68.1% 2.5

April 2015 71 24 47 66.2% 2.5

March 2015 70 19 51 72.9% 2.6

February 2015 65 18 47 72.3% 2.6

Region 15 For February 2015 to February 2016

Return to PI_Sibling_Placement_Report

Prepared by Office of Data Management,Reports and AnalysisApril 08, 2016

Report Version V2.0Source:MAGIK Monthly Data

Department Of Child Services Practice Indicator Sibling Placement ReportFor February 2016

Page 18: For February 2016 - inFebruary 2016 Region County Name Count of Sibling Cases Cases With Children Not Placed Together Cases With All Children Placed Together Percent Placed Together

February 2016Region County Name Count of Sibling

CasesCases With

Children Not Placed Together

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of

Children per Case

Statewide All 4393 1227 3166 72.1% 2.68

16 All 300 80 220 73.3% 2.69

Gibson 27 5 22 81.5% 2.41

Knox 44 10 34 77.3% 2.52

Pike 13 6 7 53.8% 3.38

Posey 28 13 15 53.6% 2.64

Vanderburgh 167 38 129 77.2% 2.74

Warrick 21 8 13 61.9% 2.67

Month Count of Sibling Cases

Cases With Placement Exceptions

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of Children per

Case

February 2016 300 80 220 73.3% 2.7

January 2016 295 77 218 73.9% 2.7

December 2015 297 76 221 74.4% 2.7

November 2015 294 83 211 71.8% 2.7

October 2015 302 84 218 72.2% 2.7

September 2015 308 84 224 72.7% 2.7

August 2015 296 84 212 71.6% 2.7

July 2015 296 75 221 74.7% 2.7

June 2015 291 78 213 73.2% 2.7

May 2015 284 79 205 72.2% 2.7

April 2015 275 79 196 71.3% 2.7

March 2015 264 73 191 72.3% 2.8

February 2015 258 67 191 74.0% 2.7

Region 16 For February 2015 to February 2016

Return to PI_Sibling_Placement_Report

Prepared by Office of Data Management,Reports and AnalysisApril 08, 2016

Report Version V2.0Source:MAGIK Monthly Data

Department Of Child Services Practice Indicator Sibling Placement ReportFor February 2016

Page 19: For February 2016 - inFebruary 2016 Region County Name Count of Sibling Cases Cases With Children Not Placed Together Cases With All Children Placed Together Percent Placed Together

February 2016Region County Name Count of Sibling

CasesCases With

Children Not Placed Together

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of

Children per Case

Statewide All 4393 1227 3166 72.1% 2.68

17 All 130 29 101 77.7% 2.72

Crawford 13 6 7 53.8% 3.08

Daviess 28 6 22 78.6% 2.50

Dubois 14 2 12 85.7% 2.36

Martin 7 1 6 85.7% 2.71

Orange 19 6 13 68.4% 2.53

Perry 21 3 18 85.7% 3.24

Spencer 28 5 23 82.1% 2.71

Month Count of Sibling Cases

Cases With Placement Exceptions

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of Children per

Case

February 2016 130 29 101 77.7% 2.7

January 2016 121 22 99 81.8% 2.7

December 2015 123 22 101 82.1% 2.7

November 2015 122 23 99 81.1% 2.7

October 2015 121 25 96 79.3% 2.7

September 2015 116 24 92 79.3% 2.7

August 2015 115 22 93 80.9% 2.7

July 2015 110 21 89 80.9% 2.7

June 2015 109 22 87 79.8% 2.7

May 2015 106 20 86 81.1% 2.7

April 2015 105 19 86 81.9% 2.7

March 2015 94 20 74 78.7% 2.7

February 2015 93 19 74 79.6% 2.6

Region 17 For February 2015 to February 2016

Return to PI_Sibling_Placement_Report

Prepared by Office of Data Management,Reports and AnalysisApril 08, 2016

Report Version V2.0Source:MAGIK Monthly Data

Department Of Child Services Practice Indicator Sibling Placement ReportFor February 2016

Page 20: For February 2016 - inFebruary 2016 Region County Name Count of Sibling Cases Cases With Children Not Placed Together Cases With All Children Placed Together Percent Placed Together

February 2016Region County Name Count of Sibling

CasesCases With

Children Not Placed Together

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of

Children per Case

Statewide All 4393 1227 3166 72.1% 2.68

18 All 198 48 150 75.8% 2.52

Clark 63 21 42 66.7% 2.54

Floyd 53 10 43 81.1% 2.53

Harrison 10 1 9 90.0% 2.40

Scott 62 15 47 75.8% 2.56

Washington 10 1 9 90.0% 2.10

Month Count of Sibling Cases

Cases With Placement Exceptions

Cases With All Children Placed

Together

Percent Placed Together of

Sibling Cases

Average Number of Children per

Case

February 2016 198 48 150 75.8% 2.5

January 2016 195 48 147 75.4% 2.5

December 2015 194 48 146 75.3% 2.5

November 2015 187 46 141 75.4% 2.6

October 2015 184 46 138 75.0% 2.6

September 2015 175 43 132 75.4% 2.6

August 2015 169 42 127 75.1% 2.6

July 2015 166 41 125 75.3% 2.6

June 2015 160 37 123 76.9% 2.5

May 2015 161 42 119 73.9% 2.5

April 2015 160 37 123 76.9% 2.5

March 2015 155 38 117 75.5% 2.5

February 2015 149 39 110 73.8% 2.5

Region 18 For February 2015 to February 2016

Return to PI_Sibling_Placement_Report

Prepared by Office of Data Management,Reports and AnalysisApril 08, 2016

Report Version V2.0Source:MAGIK Monthly Data

Department Of Child Services Practice Indicator Sibling Placement ReportFor February 2016

Page 21: For February 2016 - inFebruary 2016 Region County Name Count of Sibling Cases Cases With Children Not Placed Together Cases With All Children Placed Together Percent Placed Together

This report uses data collected at the end of the current report month. The graphs and numbers for historical months also use data from the end of thehistorical month listed.Count of Sibling Cases – This is the number of open cases as of the end of the report month which have more than one child in out of home placement at theend of the report month.Cases With All Children Placed Together – This is the number of cases with more than one child in out of home placement where all of the children areplaced in the same resource with the same resource ID.Cases With Placement Exceptions – This is the number of cases in which a child or children were not placed or not placed together in the same resource with the same resource ID. When displayed in blue the user can click on the number and be sent to the Siblings Placements Exception report or the associated region.Percent Placed Together of Sibling Cases– This is the percentage of the number of cases where all of the children in out of home placement are placedtogether divided by the number of open cases with more than one child in out of home placement as of the end of the report month.Average Number of Children per Case – This number takes the number of children in out of home placement from cases with more than one child in outof home placement and divides it by the number of cases with more than one child in out of home placement as of the end of the report month.

Release 1.02

Report Description

Prepared by Office of Data Management,Reports and AnalysisApril 08, 2016

Report Version V2.0Source:MAGIK Monthly Data

Department Of Child Services Practice Indicator Sibling Placement ReportFor February 2016