Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
�������� ����� ��
State of the art on the initiatives and activities relevant to risk assessment andrisk management of nanotechnologies in the food and agriculture sectors
Masami T. Takeuchi, Mina Kojima, Manfred Luetzow
PII: S0963-9969(14)00191-4DOI: doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2014.03.022Reference: FRIN 5138
To appear in: Food Research International
Received date: 5 August 2013Revised date: 7 March 2014Accepted date: 16 March 2014
Please cite this article as: Takeuchi, M.T., Kojima, M. & Luetzow, M., State of theart on the initiatives and activities relevant to risk assessment and risk management ofnanotechnologies in the food and agriculture sectors, Food Research International (2014),doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2014.03.022
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication.As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript.The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proofbefore it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production processerrors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers thatapply to the journal pertain.
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Title: State of the art on the initiatives and activities relevant to risk assessment and risk
management of nanotechnologies in the food and agriculture sectors.
Authors: Masami T. Takeuchia (Corresponding author), Mina Kojima
b and Manfred
Luetzowc
aFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Viale delle Terme di
Caracallar, 0153 Rome, Italy, [email protected]. +39 06 570 53076. bWorld Health
Organization (WHO), 20, Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland. cSaqual GmbH, 5432
Neuenhof, Switzerland
Abstract
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health
Organization (WHO) conducted an international expert meeting on the potential food safety
implications of the application of nanotechnologies in the food and agriculture sectors in June
2009.
The present report reviews national, regional and international activities on the risk
assessment and risk management of nanomaterials in the food and agriculture sectors that
have been carried out between 2009 and 2012. Information and data have been collected on
national and international approaches that identify and implement strategies to address
potential hazards associated with the use of nanotechnology-related products or techniques.
Selected activities by international governmental and nongovernmental organizations were
reviewed and the significant achievements are noted. Meta-analysis of scientific reviews
addressing risk assessment of nanotechnologies in the food and agriculture sectors was
conducted and key principles for the safety assessment of nanomaterials were identified.
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
2
It was concluded that although the concepts of potential use of nanomaterials in food
and the implied benefits for stakeholders including consumers have not changed significantly
since 2009, there are new products being developed and claimed to enter the market and
national and international interests in considering the needs for applying regulations on
engineered nanomaterials are increasing. The number of published risk assessment of
products used in foods that are nanomaterials or contain particles that fall within applicable
definitions is growing slowly.
Several data gaps with respect to interaction between nanomaterials and food matrices,
behaviours of nanomaterials in human body, methods to determine such interactions and
behaviours, and the relevance of such data for risk assessment continue to exist. The
international collaboration in the area of nanomaterials and nanotechnology in food and
agriculture must be strengthened. International efforts on risk assessment and risk
communication may benefit from the experience gained at national and regional level. Should
a sufficient number of case studies of risk assessment of commercial products become
available with time, a review of approaches applied and results obtained could support
development of risk assessment procedures acceptable at the international level.
Keywords
Nanotechnology; food safety; agriculture; engineered nanomaterials; manufactured
nanoparticles; FAO; WHO
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
3
1. Introduction
The food industry is, like any other sector, driven by innovations, competitiveness and
profitability. Therefore the industry is seeking new technologies to offer products with
improved tastes, flavours, textures, longer shelf-life, and better safety and traceability. The
advent of nanotechnology has unleashed prospects for the development of new products and
applications for a wide range of industrial and consumer sectors (Roco and Bainbridge, 2001).
Many countries have identified the potential of nanotechnology in the food and agriculture
sectors and are investing significantly in its applications to food production, although the
current applications in the food and agricultural sectors are relatively few, because the science
is still newly emergent. Many countries recognize the need for early consideration of the food
safety implications of the technology as there is a limited data and information on possible
positive and negative effects that the applications may pose to human health. (FAO/WHO,
2010).
An international expert meeting on the potential food safety implications of the
application of nanotechnologies in the food and agriculture sectors was convened by the Food
and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the World Health
Organization (WHO) in June 2009. In this work, we have summarized and analyzed
information that has become available since the 2009 expert meeting in order to determine
possible options for actions to be followed by relevant international organizations like FAO
and WHO.
2. Material and methods
Information on relevant risk assessment and risk management activities was gathered from
the websites of national and international institutions, organizations and governments.
Countries were selected to represent a spectrum that is representative from regional point of
view. A systematic review was conducted with the keywords such as “nanomaterial”, “food”,
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
4
“regulation” and “safety”. It should be noted that terms used in this paper reflect the
definitions applied within the various sources of information; no attempt was made to align
the terminology with definitions agreed to by the 2009 expert meeting or other definitions
applied internationally, for example, by the Codex Alimentarius Commission
(http://www.codexalimentarius.org/).
Information on actual and planned uses of nanomaterials resulting in human exposure
through food or food packaging/contact materials since 2009 was collected from a variety of
sources, including the scientific literature, websites, patent databases, market analysis reports
and material presented at conferences, workshops and symposia.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1.Application of nanomaterials in food: current status
Current and projected nanotechnology applications in the food and agriculture were
identified by the FAO/WHO expert meeting report (FAO/WHO, 2010) such as nanostructured
ingredients, nanodelivery systems for nutrients, nanosized inorganic and organic food
additives, food packaging, nanocoating of food surfaces, nano filtration and no new concepts
have been developed since then. For the years of 2009-2011, 183 patents were identified that
contain the keywords “nano* AND food*” in the patent title at http://wokinfo.com. Among
these patents, 47 related to packaging or coating applications, 19 patents concerned nano-
additives, and 10 patents covered nanotechnology applications for the detection of compounds
in food. The use of nanotechnology and nanomaterials in food and agriculture was also the
focus of a number of review monographs that summarize the status quo or state of art
(Chaudry et al., 2010; Frewer et al,. 2011; Huang, 2012).
In general, more research on the application of nanomaterials in food is expected. In
particular, research on nanoemulsion will increase because of the transfer from parallel efforts
in the drug delivery sector (ObservatoryNano, 2010). However, there are some barriers to
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
5
commercialization for nanoemulsions. First, suitable food-grade ingredients must be
identified for formulating food nanoemulsions. Second, many of the approaches that have
been developed within research laboratories may not be suitable for scale-up to industrial
production; suitable processing operations must be identified for economic production of
food-grade nanoemulsions on an industrial scale. Third, as nanodroplets may have an
enhanced bioavailability, in vivo evaluation of nanoemulsion droplets is required; however,
such studies are limited (McClements & Jiajia, 2011).
One specific area of interest is the use of nanomaterials in wastewater treatment to
improve the safety and quality of water used for agriculture, aquaculture and human
consumption. It might be possible to develop, for example, low-cost
nanofilter/nanomembrane materials that could be of interest to developing countries.
Technological solutions using nanotechnology in packaging to reduce food losses or facilitate
traceability could be also of interest (FAO/WHO, 2012). The future use of nanomaterials,
especially for industrial purposes, has recently raised specific concerns regarding their
disposal at the end of their life cycle. Such materials may not be degradable and may persist
in the environment where they may interact with compounds in the environment. This
potential hazard is already causing concern in developing countries to which waste containing
nanomaterials may be exported (FAO/WHO, 2012).
3.2.Relevant activities at the national/regional level since 2009
3.2.1. Australia/New Zealand
Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) recently published an article
describing its regulatory approach to nanoscale materials in the International Food Risk
Analysis Journal (Fletcher & Bartholomaeus, 2011). The primary focus is not on the size of
the material per se, but on materials likely to exhibit physicochemical and/or biological
novelty. FSANZ differentiates between nanoscale materials that undergo dissolution in water
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
6
or oil in the final food or in the gastrointestinal tract and nanoscale or microscale materials
that are insoluble in water and oil and non-biodegradable, particularly those that may not be
readily excreted. FSANZ has not yet received any applications to approve any novel type of
engineered nanoscale particles for food use, therefore no risk assessments have been
undertaken.
3.2.2. Brazil
Experts from the Brazilian Competitiveness Forum on Nanotechnology met in 2011 to
address the issue of regulating nanotechnology for the industrial sector (NIA, 2011). The
topics discussed during the meeting include the development of possible standards, laws and
guidelines for nanotechnology regulation in Brazil (ABDI, 2010).
3.2.3. Canada
Regulations in Canada make no explicit reference to nanomaterials at this time. Health
Canada considers any manufactured substance or product and any component material,
ingredient, device or structure to be a nanomaterial if it is at or within the nanoscale in at least
one external dimension or has internal or surface structure at the nanoscale; or it is smaller or
larger than the nanoscale in all dimensions and exhibits one or more nanoscale
properties/phenomena (Health Canada, 2011). In order to identify and assess potential risks
and benefits of nanotechnology-based health and food products, Health Canada encourages
manufactures to request a pre-submission meeting with the responsible regulatory authority to
discuss the type of information that may be required for their product’s safety assessment.
3.2.4. China
The Food Safety Law, which came into effect in 2009, does not contain any legislation
relating to nanomaterials (Food Safety Law of China, 2009). Until now, applications for using
nanominerals or food ingredients have not been accepted by regulatory authorities, but the
safety evaluation of nanotechnology in foods continues to be discussed.
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
7
3.2.5. European Union (EU)
Based on the opinion that was published by the Scientific Committee on Emerging
and Newly Identified Health Risks “Scientific basis for the definition of the term nanomaterial”
(SCENIHR, 2010), the European Commission (EC) adopted the following recommendation
on the definition of nanomaterials: “Nanomaterial” means a natural, incidental or
manufactured material containing particles, in an unbound state or as an aggregate or as an
agglomerate and where, for 50% or more of the particles in the number size distribution, one
or more external dimensions is in the size range 1 nm – 100 nm (EC, 2011). A common
system for authorisation of food additives in Europe requires re-evaluation of the safety of
any food additive to ensure that, once permitted, food additives are kept under continuous
observation and re-evaluation. This assures that an approved additive produced by a different
production process (e.g. to generate nano-form) will undergo re-evaluation of safety.
The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) published a scientific opinion with the
title “Guidance on the risk assessment of the application of nanoscience and nanotechnologies
in the food and feed chain” (EFSA Scientific Committee, 2011). EFSA concluded that the risk
assessment paradigm including hazard identification and hazard characterisation followed by
exposure assessment and risk characterisation is appropriate for these applications of
nanoscience and nanotechnologies in the food and feed chain (EFSA, 2009). The EFSA has
set up a scientific network on the risk assessment of nanotechnology in food and feed, in
which all member states are represented, to create an overview of national research activities
to facilitate collaboration and exchange of information
[http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/supporting/pub/362e.htm].
3.2.6. Japan
Nanotechnology was specified as one of the priority research targets in the third
Science and Technology Basic Plan for 2006-2010 by the Japanese government (Government
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
8
of Japan Council for Science and Technology Policy, 2006). A survey results on the use of
nanotechnology in the food sector funded by the Food Safety Commission Japan (FSCJ)
reported that there was no need for specific nanomaterial regulation at present in Japan (FSCJ,
2010). However the report concluded that there were questions on the classification of
nanotechnology-using food products as well as significant data gaps, which precluded the
drawing from firm conclusions. If any regulation needed to be introduced, safety assessment
methods would need to be established first.
3.2.7. Malaysia
Nanotechnology has been identified by the National Innovation Council as an
essential element to meet the country’s objective to turn Malaysia into a high income
developed nation by 2020. Under the National Nanotechnology Directorate, legal instruments,
appropriate parameters and monitoring mechanisms ensure compliance with all aspects of
nanotechnology development and commercialization. Malaysia is formulating a clear
roadmap to comply with any future global safety standards relevant to nanotechnology.
At present there are no specific regulations applicable to the risk assessment of
nanotechnology in Malaysia. Risk assessment is conducted to address potential health risks in
general and is not limited to nanotechnology.
3.2.8. Republic of Korea
No regulations relating to nanomaterials were found on government websites , the 3rd
International Nanomaterials Ethics Workshop in 2011, topics including changes in safety
regulation regarding nanomaterials in European countries were discussed (Korean Ministry of
Education, Science and Technology, 2011). The Korean Ministry of the Environment
developed a document on the Guideline for the life cycle assessment (LCA) for nanomaterials,
as reported in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (OECD,
2011).
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
9
3.2.9. Russian Federation
The control of nanomaterials in various industry sectors, including food and
agricultural production receive attention by the Federal Service for Surveillance of Consumer
Rights Protection and Human Well-Being (Rospotrebnadzor) since 2007. Several federal
ministries and scientific bodies developed the “concept of toxicological researches,
methodology of risk assessment, methods of identification and quantitative determination of
nanomaterials” (No. 79, 31.10. 2007) which notes that the set of the stated factors testifies to
nanomaterials processing physical and chemical properties and biological (including toxic)
action, differing from substances in a usual physical and chemical condition. In this
connection they have to be referred in all cases to new types of materials and production,
which characteristic of potential risk for human health and environment is compulsory in all
cases.
Under the umbrella of a federal programme bythe development of infrastructure of
Nanoindustry in the Russian Federation for 2008-2010, in total 50 standard and methods
document (guidelines and recommendations) for safety assessment and risk evaluation of the
nanotechnologies and nanomaterials were developed and approved. A predictive assessment
allows to classify nanomaterials as having high, average or low level of potential hazard. The
risk evaluation of nanoparticles and nanomateirals in the food sector is based on the
traditional scheme which was developed and approved for the assessment of chemical and
other technological hazards. The risk assessment processes are carried out in accordance with
guidelines and recommendations generally harmonized with requirements of OECD, EFSA,
FAO/WHO and other international and national bodies.
As of 2012 safety assessment of a number of nanomaterials used in production of food
and agricultural designation were carried out by the Institute of Nutrition of the Russian
Academy of Medical Science. Until now such work allowed to characterise nanoparticles of
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
10
titanium dioxides, silicon, aluminium and iron, the nanostructured clays (nanoexfoliated clay),
fullerene C60, metal silver (Tutelyan, 2013)
3.2.10. South Africa
No safety assessment or regulations specific to nanomaterials in the food and
agriculture sectors were found on the Government of the Republic of South Africa’s website
(Government of the Republic of South Africa, 2008). South Africa’s national nanotechnology
strategy runs until 2014 to support long-term nanoscience research (Department of Science
and Technology of the Republic of South Africa, 2011)
3.2.11. Switzerland
The Swiss Federal Council launched the “Action Plan for Synthetic Nanomaterials”
that illustrate the work required for the safe handling of nanomaterials which serves as a
framework until 2015. The plan addresses development of regulatory framework conditions
for the responsible handling of synthetic nanomaterials, creation of scientific and methodical
tools aimed at identifying and preventing potential harmful effects of synthetic nanomaterials
on health and the environment, and the promotion of the public dialogue on opportunities and
risks of nanotechnology. Safety provisions for use of nanomaterials in foods is covered by
existing regulations and procedures. Pesticides are subject to an approval procedure which
specifically asks for nanospecific information. So far the Federal Office of Public Health has
not received any requests for approval of food additives containing nanomaterials. Possible
future requests would be handled analogously to those for a new, as-yet unlisted additives.
The same would apply to requests for packaging materials containing nanomaterials which
come into contact with foodstuffs.
3.2.12. United States of America
In addressing issues raised by nanomaterials, United States (US) agencies adhere to
the principles for regulation and oversight of emerging technologies, as summarized by
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
11
Holdren, Sunstain & Siddiqui (2011). The United States Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) is in the process to finalize a guidance document on considering whether an FDA
regulated product contains nanomaterials or otherwise involves the use of nanotechnology.
The draft guidance on substances to be used in dietary supplements proposes to include issues
related to nanotechnology, if such use of nanotechnology results in new or altered properties
of the ingredient (FDA, 2011). Another guidance document is also being developed, which
addresses the impact that manufacturing changes, including a change in particle size, would
have on the regulatory status of authorized materials, which will address nanomaterials (FDA,
2012). The FDA does not maintain a list of nanomaterials that it has assessed (A. McCarthy,
FDA, personal communication, 2011).
The nanomaterial research strategy from 2009 defines the US Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA)’s nanotechnology research programme to conduct focused research on
nanomaterial safety (EPA, 2009). The EPA has identified five nanomaterial types for
investigation that are widely used in products or have been recognized for their potential uses
(EPA, 2011). The materials being studied include carbon tubes and fullerenes, cerium oxide,
titanium dioxide and silver.
3.3.Relevant activities by international governmental and nongovernmental
organizations since 2009
In the last few years, the Institute of Food Technologists (IFT) has supported research and
published several articles on nanotechnology relating to an ongoing project on safety
assessment. IFT offers an on-demand online courses including “Introduction to Nanoscience”.
There have been many scientific literature published on the IFT journals and IFT conferences
have featured many sessions on the topic of nanotechnology.
The NanoRelease project from the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) Research
Foundation’s Center for Risk Science Innovation and Application aims to promote the safe
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
12
development of nanomaterials by supporting the development of methods to understand the
release of nanomaterials used in products. As part of the NanoRelease project, data, methods,
guidance, standards and links are collected(ILSI, 2011). NanoCharacter is another project
aimed at developing a framework and road map for implementing widespread adoption of
principles of reporting characteristics of nanomaterials in studies of commercial nanoproducts.
The project builds on other international efforts to establish the list of what to measure and
will lay out how to get from concept to reality of consistent reporting. ILSI Europe initiated
the Novel Foods and Nanotechnology Task Force (ILSI Europe, 2011), which started its work
focusing on new technologies for the safety/nutritional assessment of novel foods and food
ingredients. ILSI Europe has developed a peer-reviewed article on the safety assessment of
engineered nanomaterials in food (Cockburn et al., 2012).
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) established the Technical
Committee 229 Nanotechnologies with the scope of standardization in the field of
nanotechnologies. Specific tasks include developing standards for: terminology and
nomenclature; metrology and instrumentation, including specification for reference materials;
test methodologies; modelling and simulations; and science-based health, safety, and
environmental practices (http://isotc.iso.org/livelink/livelink/open/tc229).
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has two relevant
working parties: (1) the Working Party on Nanotechnology and (2) the Working Party on
Manufactured Nanomaterials. Both working parties do not have food as a main subject;
nevertheless, OECD’s work on the testing and assessment of nanomaterials can be used for
food-related nanomaterial applications (M. Gonzalez, OECD, personal communication, 2011).
OECD’s main activities are on: hosting database on research into the safety of manufactured
nanomaterials; safety testing of representative set of manufactured nanomaterials; defining the
role of alternative test methods in nanotoxicology; developing manufactured nanomaterials
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
13
and test guidelines; developing voluntary schemes and regulatory programmes; conducting
projects to evaluate environmental risk assessment approaches; and conducting projects to
investigate the potential benefits of applications based on the use of manufactured
nanomaterials for environmentally sustainable use of nanotechnology.
Overall there have been a number of meetings, symposia and workshops on the topic of
nanomaterials organized by several international or regional bodies at global, regional and
national levels. In many unique ways, these events discussed the current status of the
technology and future possible needs, however there has not been a conclusive remarks on
how the risk assessment and risk management of nanomaterials in food and agriculture sectors
should be conducted. This confirms that this is the area that requires further active dialogues
among various stakeholders in many parts of the world.
3.4.Scientific reviews addressing risk assessment of nanotechnologies in the food and
agriculture sectors
Recent scientific reviews on risk assessment of nanotechnologies in the food and agriculture
sectors confirm that information on this topic is limited (Tran & Chaudhry, 2010; Card et al.,
2011; Horie & Fujita, 2011; Magnuson, Jonaitis & Card, 2011; Morris, 2011; Rico et al.,
2011; Krug & Wick, 2011). A review on the interaction of nanoparticles with edible plants
found that understanding of plant toxicity is at the early stages. Few studies have been
performed on the accumulation of engineered nanomaterials in crop plants such as rape,
radish, lettuce, corn and cucumber (Rico et al., 2011). Rico et al. (2011) noted that among the
studied nanomaterials, the carbon-based nanomaterials fullerenes C70 and fullerols C60(OH)20
and most of the metal-based nanomaterials (titanium dioxide, cerium oxide, magnetite, zinc
oxide, gold, silver, copper and iron) accumulated in the plants. These compounds stored in the
plants can be transferred to consumers. Depending on the studied nanomaterial and plant,
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
14
negative effects of the nanoparticles on the food crops were observed, such as reduced
germination, reduced root growth and delayed flowering.
Card et al. (2011) evaluated published literature on the safety of oral exposure to food-
related nanomaterials and found that there are currently insufficient reliable data to allow a
clear safety assessment. Card et al. (2011) also considered that non-food-related engineered
nanomaterials require evaluation of oral toxicity in light of possible contamination of the food
supply. Morris (2011) concluded that the lack of information on the possible toxicity of
nanomaterials makes it difficult to assess the safe or Acceptable Daily Intake. According to
Magnuson, Jonaitis & Card (2011), the literature on the safety of oral exposure to
nanomaterials inadequately characterizes nanomaterials with insufficient physicochemical
parameters, concluding that “Unless nanomaterials are adequately characterized, the results of
the toxicology studies cannot be utilized to predict toxicity of other nanomaterials as changes
in any of the characteristics may result in changes in biological activity”.
The safety assessment of nanomaterials will depend on their adequately characterized
chemical properties; critical parameters include biopersistence and digestibility. Based on the
development of nano forms of trace minerals, the group led by D. Pereira (2012) at Medical
Research Council, UK Human Nutrition Research identified three different scenarios.
Digestible, non-biopersistent nanomaterials such as nano forms of a salt will be digested
(dissolve) prior to any cellular exposure; for cells and tissues, there will be no difference if
compared with conventional forms. A second type of digestible, non-biopersistent
nanomaterial, such as micellar nano formulations or ferritin, will only partially degrade in the
gut; they may therefore be absorbed as nano structures but will be rapidly broken down in
cells (Powel et al 2013). A third type, non-digestible, biopersistent nanomaterials, may remain
intact and will raise different issues, an important one being their adsorbed surface materials,
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
15
which may be removed in the stomach and replaced in the gut by luminal molecules before
cellular uptake (FAO/WHO, 2012).
4. Conclusions
The concepts of potential use of nanomaterials in food and the implied benefits for
stakeholders including consumers have not changed significantly since 2009. New products
are being developed and claimed to enter the market, but the available data from published
sources and databases do not allow verifying whether product ideas are just concepts,
unsubstantiated claims, or are already resulting in exposure of consumers to food being
produced with nanotechnology/nanomaterials at any significant rate.
The statement by the FAO/WHO expert meeting (FAO/WHO, 2010) that current risk
assessment approaches were suitable to assess nanomaterials and nanotechnologies used in
food is supported by those agencies/institutions that have investigated this issue in more detail.
National and regional food safety agencies increased their focus during the past few years on
investigating the implications of nanomaterials added to or used with food. Policies and
guidance documents have been published that allow a better understanding of how risk
assessment of nanomaterials will be performed in the future. OECD reviewed their testing
guidelines for hazard identification and characterization of food chemicals and found them to
be generally applicable for the testing of nanomaterials. Other research-oriented projects
initiated by OECD will provide valuable insights into aspects of risk assessment specific to
engineered nanomaterials. The approach to be published by ILSI for nanomaterials to be used
in food is interesting, as it tries to systematically review the information already available for
conventional material and discusses what properties would allow extrapolation from
conventional to novel nanomaterials. Further development and implementation of this concept
may lead to reduced animal testing. The main areas of chemical risk assessment at the
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
16
international level address food additives, pesticide residues, veterinary drug residues, some
processing aids, such as enzymes, and occasionally micro-nutrients. Nanomaterials would be
within the scope of such activities; for example, a nanoscale food additive could be addressed
by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), and residues from a
nanoscale pesticide could be addressed by the Joint FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticide
Residues (JMPR). There are, however, some areas of food chemicals, such as materials in
contact with foods (e.g. food packaging), that occasionally are addressed by FAO/WHO
expert bodies, but for which no comprehensive and systematic programme is in place; for a
“nano-plastic material” to be used in food packaging, there is no risk analysis framework at
the international level currently in place. Several data gaps with respect to interaction between
nanomaterials and food matrices, behaviours of nanomaterials in human body, methods to
determine such interactions and behaviours, and the relevance of such data for risk assessment
continue to exist. Coordinated international collaboration and information exchange between
scientists from academia, industry and authorities, to address such gaps may be necessary and
useful.
A key finding of the FAO/WHO expert meeting was that public confidence in engineered
nanomaterials can be supported through institutional efforts to provide an overview of
applications of nanotechnology in food and packaging that are transparent and allow public
involvement (FAO/WHO, 2010). It was found that the mandatory labelling would lead to
greater transparency for the consumer and enable consumer freedom of choice. However,
mandatory labelling could also lead to the avoidance of the use of nanotechnologies in
consumer products, including those that are beneficial (Gruère, 2011). So far, apart from the
EU, no country has set a regulatory framework for the mandatory labelling of nanomaterials
in food (EU, 2011). The mandatory labelling of materials that meet a definition that reflects
only dimension (i.e. is not risk based) provides a new element in the discussion that might be
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
17
of interest to the Codex Alimentarius Commission, as it could result in technical barriers to
trade of foods to which nanomaterials have been added. In a report on the EC’s public online
consultation among key stakeholders about nanomaterials, the majority of the 716
respondents regarded applications in agriculture and food with more scepticism than
applications in other areas (EC, 2010).
Acknowledgements
This work was conducted jointly by FAO and WHO, however the opinions or assertions
contained herein are our private views and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting
the view of FAO or WHO. M. Luetzow designed and conducted the research and analyzed
and organized the information/data collected. M. Takeuchi facilitated the development
process of the research and analysis, and prepared the article. M. Kojima contributed in
reviewing the information and the article. We acknowledge the responses and comments
provided by various international experts. Technical contributions from several FAO and
WHO colleagues are also gratefully appreciated.
References
ABDI (Brazilian Agency for Industrial Development). (2010). Estudo Prospectivo
Nanotecnologia. Brasília, Brazilian Agency for Industrial Development, Available at
<http://www.abdi.com.br/Estudo/Estudo%20Prospectivo%20de%20Nanotecnologia.pdf>Acc
essed 23 November 2011.
Card, J. W., Jonaitis, T. S., Tafazoli, S. & Magnuson, B. A. (2011). An appraisal of the
published literature on the safety and toxicity of food-related nanomaterials. Critical Reviews
in Toxicology, 41(1), 20–49.
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
18
Chaudhry, Q., Castle, L. & Watkins, R. (eds.) (2010). Nanotechnologies in Food. London:
Royal Society of Chemistry Publishers.
Cockburn, A., Bradford, R., Buck, N., Constable, A., Edwards, G., Haber, B., Hepburn, P.,
Howlett, J., Kampers, F., Klein, C., Radomski. M., Stamm, H., Wijnhoven, S. & Wildemann.
T. (2012). Approaches to the safety assessment of engineered nanomaterials (ENM) in food.
Food and Chemical Toxicology, 50(6), 2224–2242.
Department of Science and Technology of the Republic of South Africa. (2011). The national
nanotechnology strategy. Pretoria, Department of Science and Technology, Available at
<http://www.dst.gov.za/images/pdfs/Nanotech.pdf>Accessed 23 November 2011.
EC. (2010). Report on the European Commission’s public online consultation. Towards a
strategic nanotechnology action plan (SNAP) 2010–2015. European Commission, Available
at <http://ec.europa.eu/research/consultations/snap/report_en.pdf>Accessed 6 December 2011.
EC. (2011). Commission Recommendation of 18 October 2011 on the definition of
nanomaterial. Official Journal of the European Union, L 275, 38–40, Available at <http://eur-
lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:275:0038:0040:EN:PDF>Accessed
25 October 2011.
EFSA. (2009). Scientific opinion of the Scientific Committee on a request from the European
Commission on the potential risks arising from nanoscience and nanotechnologies on food
and feed safety. EFSA Journal, 958, 1–39, Available at
<http://www.efsa.europa.eu/de/scdocs/doc/958.pdf>Accessed 25 October 2011.
EFSA Scientific Committee. (2011). Scientific Opinion on Guidance on the risk assessment
of the application of nanoscience and nanotechnologies in the food and feed chain. EFSA
Journal, 9(5), 2140, Available at
<http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2140.pdf>Accessed 25 October 2011.
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
19
EPA. (2009). Nanomaterial research strategy. Washington, DC, United States Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development (EPA 620/K-09/011), Available at
<http://www.epa.gov/nanoscience/files/nanotech_research_strategy_final.pdf>Accessed 7
November 2011.
EPA. (2011). Types of nanomaterials under investigation by the EPA. Washington, DC,
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Available at
<http://www.epa.gov/nanoscience/quickfinder/nanomaterials.htm> Accessed 7 November
2011.
EU. (2011). Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of
25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers, amending Regulations
(EC) No 1924/2006 and (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council,
and repealing Commission Directive 87/250/EEC, Council Directive 90/496/EEC,
Commission Directive 1999/10/EC, Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of
the Council, Commission Directives 2002/67/EC and 2008/5/EC and Commission Regulation
(EC) No 608/2004. Official Journal of the European Union, L 304. 18–63, Available at
<http://eur-
lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:304:0018:0063:EN:PDF>Accessed
6 December 2011.
FAO/WHO. (2010). FAO/WHO expert meeting on the application of nanotechnologies in the
food and agriculture sectors. Potential food safety implications. Meeting report. Rome: FAO
and WHO, Available at <http://
http://www.fao.org/docrep/012/i1434e/i1434e00.pdf>Accessed 15 July 2013.
FAO/WHO. (2012). Joint FAO/WHO Seminar on Nanotechnologies in food and agriculture,
27 March 2012. Rome: FAO. Available at
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
20
<http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agns/pdf/topics/Nano_Report_Final_20120625.pdf>
Accessed 15 July 2013.
FDA. (2011). Draft guidance for industry: Dietary supplements: New dietary ingredient
notifications and related issues. Silver Spring, MD, United States Food and Drug
Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Available at
<http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/GuidanceDocuments
/DietarySupplements/ucm257563.htm>Accessed 16 February 2012.
FDA. (2012). Guidance for Industry. Assessing the Effects of Significant Manufacturing
Process Changes, Including Emerging Technologies, on the Safety and Regulatory Status of
Food Ingredients and Food Contact Substances, Including Food Ingredients that are Color
Additives (Draft guidance for industry). Silver Spring, MD, United States Food and Drug
Administration, Available at
<http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Cosmetics/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInfo>rma>tion/G
uidanceDocuments/UCM300927.pdf>Accessed 1 February 2013.
Fletcher, N. & Bartholomaeus, A. (2011). Regulation of nanotechnologies in food in Australia
and New Zealand. International Food Risk Analysis Journal, 1(2), 33-40.
Food Safety Law of China. (2009). The Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China.
Procedural Law Research Institution at China University of Political Science and Law,
Available at
<http://www.procedurallaw.cn/english/law/200903/t20090320_196425.html>Accessed 4
January 2012.
Frewer, L., Norde, N., Fischer, A. & Kampers, F. (eds.) (2011). Nanotechnology in the Agri-
Food Sector: Implications for the future. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag.
FSCJ. (2010). A basic survey report on safety assessment information on the use of
nanotechnology in the food sector. Conducted by the Toray Research Center as “A
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
21
comprehensive study for ensuring food safety under the Cabinet Office Food Safety
Commission (FY 2009)” for the Food Safety Commission of Japan, Available at
<http://www.fsc.go.jp/english/survey_programs/use_nanotechnology.pdf>Accessed 16
January 2012.
Government of Japan Council for Science and Technology Policy. (2006). Science and
technology basic plan [provisional translation]. Tokyo, Government of Japan, Council for
Science and Technology Policy, Available at <http://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/english/basic/3rd-
BasicPlan_06-10.pdf>Accessed 8 November 2011.
Government of the Republic of South Africa. (2008). Foodstuffs, Cosmetics and Disinfectants
Amendment Act, 2007. Government Gazette, Vol. 512, No. 30822, 28 February 2008,
Available at <http://www.info.gov.za/view/DownloadFileAction?id=88587>Accessed 23
November 2011.
Gruère, G. P. (2011). Labeling nano-enabled consumer products. Nano Today, 6(2), 117–121.
Health Canada. (2011). Policy statement on Health Canada’s working definition for
nanomaterial. Ottawa, Health Canada, Available at <http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/sr-
sr/pubs/nano/pol-eng.php> Accessed 8 November 2011.
Holdren, J. P., Sunstein, C. R. & Siddiqui, I. A. (2011). Principles for regulation and
oversight of emerging technologies. Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and
agencies from the Office of Science and Technology Policy, the United States Trade
Representative and the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Available at
<http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/inforeg/for-agencies/Principles-for-
Regulation-and-Oversight-of-Emerging-Technologies-new.pdf> Accessed 8 November 2011.
Horie, M. & Fujita, K. (2011). Chapter 4: Toxicity of metal oxides nanoparticles. In Fishbein,
J. C. (ed.), Advances in molecular toxicology, Vol. 5. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V.
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
22
Huang, Q. (Ed.) (2012). Nanotechnology in the Food, Beverage and Nutraceutical Industries.
Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing Ltd.
ILSI. (2011). Developing methods to measure release of nanomaterials from solid matrices.
Washington, DC, International Life Sciences Institute Research Foundation, Availalble at
<http://www.ilsi.org/ResearchFoundation/Pages/NanoRelease1.aspx> Accessed 26 October
2011.
ILSI Europe. (2011). Novel Foods and Nanotechnology Task Force. International Life
Sciences Institute Europe, Available at
<http://www.ilsi.org/Europe/Pages/TF_NovelFoods.aspx> Accessed 26 October 2011.
Korean Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. (2011). The 3rd International
Nanomaterials Ethics Workshop. Seoul, Korean Ministry of Education, Science and
Technology, Available at
<http://english.mest.go.kr/web/42208/en/board/enview.do?scriptYn=&searchWord=nano&bb
sId=265&lineCnt=10&encodeYn=N¤tPage=&mode=&y=26&x=26&password=&sear
chOption=content&boardSeq=20205&mode=view> Accessed 23 November 2011.
Krug, H. F. & Wick, P. (2011). Nanotoxikologie – eine interdisziplinäre Herausforderung.
Angewandte Chemie, 123, 1294–1314.
Magnuson, B. A., Jonaitis, T. S. & Card, J. W. (2011). A brief review of the occurrence, use,
and safety of food-related nanomaterials. Journal of Food Science, 76(6), R126–R133.
McCarthy, FDA (2011) Personal communication. Interview by M. Luetzow [Telephone].
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
McClements, D. J. & Jiajia, R. (2011). Food-grade nano-emulsions; formulation, fabrication,
properties, performance, biological fate, and potential toxicity. Critical Reviews in Food
Science and Nutrition, 51(4), 285-330.
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
23
Morris, V. J. (2011). Emerging roles of engineered nanomaterials in the food industry. Trends
in Biotechnology, 29(10), 509–516.
NIA (Nanotechnology Industries Association). (2011). Brazilian Competitiveness Forum on
Nanotechnology discusses nanotechnology regulation. Brussels: Nanotechnology Industries
Association, Available at <http://www.nanotechia.org/global-news/brazilian-competitiveness-
forum-on-nanotechnology-discusses-nanotechnology-regulation> Accessed 23 November
2011.
ObservatoryNANO. (2010). Observatory Nano factsheets 2009-2010. Project funded by the
European Union’s framework programme, Available at
<http://www.observatorynano.eu/project/document/3319/> Accessed 15 July 2013.
OECD. (2011). National activities on life cycle assessment of nanomaterials. Paris,
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Available at
<http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/displaydocumentpdf?cote=env/jm/mono%282011%
2954&doclanguage=en> Accessed 2 January 2012.
Pereira (2012). Personal communication. FAO/WHO Seminar. Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
Powell, J. J., Bruggraber, S. F. A., Faria, N., Poots, L. K., Hondow, N., Pennycook, T. J.,
Latunde-Dada, G. O., Simpson, R. J., Brown, A. P. & Pereira, D. I. A. A nano-disperse
ferritin-core mimetic that efficiently corrects anemia without luminal iron redox activity
Nanomedicine. 6 January 2014 (in Press).
Rico, C. M., Majumdar, S., Duarte-Gardea, M., Peralta-Videa, J. R. & Gardea-Torresdey, J. L.
(2011). Interaction of nanoparticles with edible plants and their possible implications in the
food chain. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 59(8), 3485–3498.
Roco, M. C. & Bainbridge, W. S. (eds.) (2001). Societal implications of nanoscience and
nanotechnology. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, (pp. 3-4).
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
24
SCENIHR (Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks, European
Commission). (2010). Scientific basis for the definition of the term “nanomaterial”. European
Commission, Directorate-General for Health & Consumers, Scientific Committee on
Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks, Available at
<http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/emerging/docs/scenihr_o_032.pdf>
Accessed 28 October 2011.
Tran, L. & Chaudhry, Q. (2010). Chapter 8: Engineered nanoparticles and food: an
assessment of exposure and hazard. In Chaudhry, Q., Castle, L. & Watkins, R. (eds.),
Nanotechnologies in food. Cambridge, UK: The Royal Society of Chemistry, RSC Publishing.
Tutelyan, V. A. (2013). The control over nanomaterials. Russian Federation. Letter sent in
response to the request for public review.