13
Food Monitoring for the US How low should we go - FDA limit for US Bye-Bye Becquerels Is there radiation in the food? Ami is 10 and lives in Yanaizu, Fukushima Technical Talk We are already contaminated Who’s testing food What they are finding

Food Monitoring for the US

  • Upload
    nimrod

  • View
    41

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Food Monitoring for the US. Technical Talk We are already contaminated. Who’s testing food What they are finding. How low should we go - FDA limit for US Bye-Bye Becquerels. Is there radiation in the food ? Ami is 10 and lives in Yanaizu , Fukushima prefecture . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Food Monitoring  for the US

Food Monitoring for the US

How low should we go - FDA limit for US

Bye-Bye Becquerels

Is there radiation in the food?Ami is 10 and lives in Yanaizu, Fukushima prefecture.

Technical Talk We are already contaminated Who’s testing food What they are finding

Page 2: Food Monitoring  for the US

The a b g’s of radioactivity

Different types of radiation (a, b, g) are blocked by different substances

Radioactivity is measured in Becquerels where 1 Bq = 1 atomic disintegration per second

Page 3: Food Monitoring  for the US

Technical Difficulties

“It was beautiful to look upon, so that any one who should see it must long for it, but whoever ate even a little bit of it must die.”

Strontium 90 emits a beta particlePlutonium 239 emits an alpha particle

Cesium 137 emits a gamma ray*

Page 4: Food Monitoring  for the US

ATOMIC BOMB blasts worldwide:

Contamination Sources

954 quadrillion Bq cesium 137 (that’s 15 zeros)

Page 5: Food Monitoring  for the US

ROUTINE RELEASES US

????

Cesium 134 & 137

Page 6: Food Monitoring  for the US

CHERNOBYL85 quadrillion Bq cesium 137

Page 7: Food Monitoring  for the US

500 quadrillion Bq noble gas (unspecified, to air)

Since April 2012, 10 million Bq cesium-134 & 137 are still released every hour

FUKUSHIMA cesium 134 & 137 27.1 quadrillion Bq (air and ocean)

Page 8: Food Monitoring  for the US

US: Who’s Testing?

Page 9: Food Monitoring  for the US

What they found (so far)9-11 Bq/kg Cs 134 & & Cs 137

600-2,500 Bq/kg I 131

18 Bq/kg Cs 134 & Cs 137

650 Bq/kg to2300 Bq/kg Cs

14 Bq/kg Cs 134 & Cs 137

1,038 Bq/kg Cs

Page 10: Food Monitoring  for the US

How low should you go?

Page 11: Food Monitoring  for the US

Making contaminated food acceptable

International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) 111

“placing contaminated food on the market”

“ negative reactions from consumers outside the contaminated areas “

Page 12: Food Monitoring  for the US

Bye-Bye Becquerels

-Silence Deafening: www.silencedeafening.com-Beyond Nuclear: www.beyondnuclear.org

-FFAN coalition includes mothers who evacuated from Japan to escape radioactive contamination and were horrified to learn the US recommendations are worse-5Bq/kg binding rather than just recommendations-Widespread testing: foodstuffs, etc.

Page 13: Food Monitoring  for the US