Upload
ellery
View
71
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Food and Nutrition Surveillance and Response in Emergencies. Session 9 Food Security Assessment. Introduction to the Concept of Food Security. Definition: Everyone has at all times, access to and control over sufficient quantities of good quality food for an active, healthy life - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
11
Food and Nutrition Surveillance Food and Nutrition Surveillance and Response in Emergenciesand Response in Emergencies
Session 9Session 9Food Security AssessmentFood Security Assessment
22
Introduction to the Concept of Food Introduction to the Concept of Food Security Security
Definition:• Everyone has at all times, access to and
control over sufficient quantities of good quality food for an active, healthy life
• All people at all times have both physical and economic access to sufficient food to meet their dietary needs for a productive and healthy life (Food Aid and Food Security: USAID Policy Paper. February 1995)
33
Everyone has Equity; all people
At all times Stability of food availability, access and utilization; Protection against risks affecting people’s food security
Access to The right to food. People are entitled to enough food. Affordability – depending on purchasing power and food prices; Own prodn depending on land rights etc.
And control over Power to take decisions on food prodn, distn + consn
Sufficient quantities Enough food to meet daily requirements, sufficient stock at hh and community levels to resist shocks
Of good quality food Variety of nutritious, safe and culturally appropriate foods
For an active and healthy life
Proper consumption and good biological utilization of food, resulting in adequate nutritional status of people
44
Concept of Food Security ContinuedConcept of Food Security Continued
• Is broad and complex concept determined by interaction of a range of agro-physical, Socio-economic and biological factors – no single direct measure of food security
• Simplified by focusing on three distinct inter-related dimensions of the concept:
– Food availability– Food access– Food utilization
55
Concept of Food Security ContinuedConcept of Food Security Continued
• Food availability – achieved when sufficient quantities of food are available to all individuals
• Food access – ensured when households and all individuals within them have adequate resources to obtain appropriate foods for nutritious diet
– Depends on income, food distribution and price
• Food utilization – proper biological use of food
66
Food Security Conceptual FrameworkFood Security Conceptual Framework
• Important issues which lead to food insecurity of households and individuals in the developing world include (among others):
– Chronic poverty– Rapid population growth– Declining per capita food output– Poor infrastructure– Ecological constraints– Limited arable land– Inappropriate policies– Disease– Poor water and sanitation
77
– Inadequate nutritional knowledge
– Civil wars and Ethnic conflicts
– Natural Disasters
• Each factor impacts on household and individual food security in different ways
• Relative importance of the pathways of these factors as determinants of food insecurity vary across households, locations and over time
• Clarity of these pathways is critical for:– design of interventions
– identification and interpretation of food security indicators
88
• A well defined conceptual framework :– Provides broader context critical for successfully
interpreting food security indicators– Supports the design of data collection systems
and analytical plans
• The USAID Food Security Conceptual Framework
• FAO, ES Department Framework on Food Security, Livelihoods and Nutrition
99
• Assessment of food insecurity (at hh level) needs to measure not only the lack of access, availability and utilization or use of food, but also perceptions on what constitutes:
– Insufficiency determine the use
– Unacceptable of available/– Uncertainty or unsustainable accessible food
1010
Methods of assessing food securityMethods of assessing food security: : Famine Early warning systems and food Famine Early warning systems and food
security assessmentsecurity assessment
• Early warning activities range – global focus on national and international food availability to localised focus on issues of access to food and food security.
– Global information and Early Warning System (GIEWS) of the FAO
• Monitors food supply and demand around the world• Aim – to warn the international aid community and
participating national governments of food shortages for food aid palnning
1111
– Famine Early Warning System (FEWS) of the USIAD• Publishes both regular regional bulletins and
‘special alerts’.• Notices are based on vulnerability assessments
that evaluate components of national and household food security in order to identify:– which people are food insecure
– the nature of their problem
– Factors influencing their food security, and
– Possible interventions
1212
• Periodic emergency food assessment e.g.:– The regular joint FAO/WFP food and crop
assessments undertaken to estimate national food aid needs – based on a food balance sheet – impart part of GIEWS
– Periodic WFP/UNHCR joint food assessment missions (JFAMS) – make recommendations on:
• number of beneficiaries
• modalities of assistance
• composition of the food basket
• ration size
• duration of assistance, and
• logistical arrangements
1313
• Regular food security monitoring systems and/or emergency food security assessments
– Are more localised– Indicators depend on the location but generally
include:• market prices
• variety of coping strategies
• Migration, and
• sometimes anthropometric status
1414
• Ad hoc food security assessments of emergencies - Common among NGOs
– The food economy approach of SCF- UK• Developed in 1994
• Assesses food aid needs and allows for effective targeting of food aid in protracted emergencies
• Approach has two main objectives:– Understand how people survive and how patterns of survival
have changed as a result of ‘shocks’
– Estimate the size of the food gap and thereby estimating food aid needs
• Highlighted the need for baseline data to interprete current events or food security indicators
1515
• Somalia Food Security Assessment Unit (FSAU) is an example of combining various types of food security information systems.
– Uses food economy approach to establish a baseline and monitors food security indicators and nutritional status over time to assess changes in food security
– Relies on ad hoc missions, assessments, and sometimes surveys where food security indicators cannot be monitored continously
– Collaborates with USIAD FEWS to produce a joint newsletter, Rainwatch.
– FEWS provides satellite data on rainfall estimates, cloud top temperatures, and the normalised difference vegetative index while FSAU field monitors and other NGOs provide information collected locally on the ground
1616
• Many NGOs are involved in assessing hh food security : SCF, ACF, Action Against Hunger (AAH), CARE, Oxfarm, and Concern Worldwide.
• These agencies have similar concepts and definitions of food security – but have developed a range of approaches to assessing food security – reasons:
– Food security assessment may have different objectives e.g.:
• Estimation of food aid needs
• Analysis of coping mechanisms
• Design of potential interventions
– In all cases information is intended to help decision makers form knowledgeable and timely decisions.
1717
Indicators of Measuring Food InsecurityIndicators of Measuring Food Insecurity
• Measures of food insecurity need to asses: – Availability– Access– Utilization or use of food
• Measures must also assess:– Other important factors that determine use of
available/accessible food e.g. perceptions on what constitutes insufficiency, inadequacy, unacceptable, uncertainty or unsustainable
1818
• Hence multiple indicators are used to reflect the various dimensions of the problem
• Most commonly used are:– Food production– Income– Total expenditure– Food expenditure– Share of expenditure on food– Calorie consumption, and– nutritional status
1919
• Not all programmes can be evaluated using all or even some of the indicators.
• Food security indicators are summary measures of one or more of the dimensions of food security used to assess food security status, demonstrate change or the result of a programme activity for a target population
• Food security indicators are constructed from a set of observation, or measurements of food security-related conditions which are classified according to a set of criteria, aggregated, and placed in some proper perspective
2020
Selecting/Choosing Among IndicatorsSelecting/Choosing Among Indicators• When selecting indicators of food security one must
define what they determine and level at which they operate i.e. community, household or individual.
• The problem in choosing specific measures is how to maximise the quality of the information and its benefit to decision-making against the costs of collecting, processing, and analysing that information
• Good measures should be relevant, credible, low-cost, comparable, time sensitive and appropriate for the decisions that need to be made
2121
• Criteria for deciding when and what to monitor and evaluate often includes:
– Ease of collecting, interpreting & using the information
– Time required– Source of information– Variability in x-tic/element being measured– Cost– Use of the information– Level at which information will be used– Relative importance of the information
2222
Indicator ProxiesIndicator Proxies
• Some food security indicators are difficult or expensive to measure directly
• Hence proxy-indicators have been developed e.g. for incomes:
– Gender of hh head– Availability of working age individuals within hh– Ethnicity, social class, or caste– Size of family dwelling– Type of materials used to construct dwelling– Method of water collection & sanitation availability– Ownership of key assets– Geographic location of hh
2323
Types of IndicatorsTypes of Indicators
Household food security indicators can be grouped into two:
1. Process indicators
2. Outcome indicators
Process Indicators• Reflect food supply and food access• Indicators reflecting food supply are those that play
a role in limiting food availability and the options households have for food access
2424
• These indicators provide information on the likelihood of a shock or disaster event that will adversely affect household food security
• Examples:– Inputs and measures of agricultural production
(agro-meteorological data)– Access to natural resources– Institutional development– Market infrastructure– Exposure to conflicts or its consequences (influx
of refugees)
2525
• Specific indicators:– Access to food aid programmes– Rainfall (total, distribution and timing)– Natural resources (wild foods, fuel etc)– Access to all weather roads– Access credit facilities– Access to pasture resources
• Food supply indicators can be derived from records and data sheets e.g. r/fall records, food balance sheets etc.
– Useful for monitoring and determining food security at regional level
– Limitation – they are too aggregated to detect pockets of vulnerability
2626
• Indicators reflecting food access – provide information on the capacity of the population affected by shock or disaster to withstand its effects i.e. coping ability indicators.
– Information can be derived e.g. by SE indicators that represent the degree of stress and ways in which the households are responding to the stress
– Coping ability food access indicators measure the extent of food insecurity by making use of frequency and severity of food-consumption related strategies
2727
Outcome indicatorsOutcome indicators• Are proxies for adequate food consumption• Revolve around measures of food
consumption• Are of two types:
1. Direct – attempt to measure actual food consumption.
– Include: food diversity/variety scores, food frequency consumption data and consumption expenditures
2. Indirect – generally only used when direct indicators are inappropriate in terms of time and cost
– Include – nutritional status of index children
2828
Outcome indicators continuedOutcome indicators continued• Limitation – proxies that are appropriate for
one area may not necessarily be appropriate for other areas.