Focus on « non scientific »

parts of the proposalMSCA Individual Fellowships

Eugénia Shadlova, Chargée d’affaires Europe , SAIC, Université Paris-Sud

Europe.saic@u-psud.fr

2.3 Quality of the supervision and the hosting arrangements•Specify in all relevant elements on the supervisor profile : both his scientific competences and his experience in mentoring •His implication in European and national research projects should also be mentioned.•Do not forget the Integration/practical tutoring aspects. The purpose is to show that the Scientist in Charge will be actively involved in the tutoring of the candidate post-doc, and that you will not simply be one more post-doc for his team.

3.2 Effectiveness of the proposed measures for communication and results dissemination • Communication and public engagement strategy of the

action Communication towards large public and vulgarization of your project’s

results Think over, result by result, what can, in your project, be interesting for

which type of public and under which form . Give concrete examples!

• Dissemination of the research results Scientific publications, communication to industrial fora and higher

education Mention your Open Access publication strategy

• Exploitation of results and intellectual property Commercial exploitation of the project’s results, technology transfer to

industry, intellectual property protection Explain a positive impact of such exploitation on your career Specify the plans for the exploitation of results and IPR in the Gantt chart.

4.2 Appropriateness of the management structure and procedures

• Progress monitoring mechanisms • Financial & administrative management• Risk management : risks that might endanger reaching

project objectives and the contingency plans

4.3 Appropriateness of the institutional environment

Describe your host legal entity and show why this institutional environment will give the fellowship the

maximum chance of a successful outcome

4.4 Competences, experience and complementarity of the participating organizations and institutional commitment• Describe the benefit of your project for both host and partner

institutions and vice versa.• Training activities and knowledge transfer activities that will

be put in place in order to maximize this positive impact of the fellowship.

• Describe competences, expertise and the infrastructure of the host laboratory. Demonstrate the added value of this expertise and infrastructure for your project.

• Does your project correspond to to the laboratory’s strategy? Show the positive impact that your competences, your previously acquired expertise and your project will bring to the laboratory. • Mention the importance of access that you will get to

the professional network of both host and partner institutions• Your project will also help to reinforce the cooperation

between the host and the partner institution.