Fluide Structure Interaction

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/9/2019 Fluide Structure Interaction

    1/29

    A FLUIDSTRUCTURE INTERACTION

    METHOD FOR HIGHLY DEFORMABLE

    SOLIDS

  • 8/9/2019 Fluide Structure Interaction

    2/29

    Introduction IEFGM (Immersed Element-Free

    Galerkin Method ) Formulation of the IEFGM

    A lication exam les

    PRESENTATION OVERVIEW

    Comparison with analytical solution

    Conclusion

    References

  • 8/9/2019 Fluide Structure Interaction

    3/29

    INTRODUCTION

    IEFGM Necessary ???

    ALE FEM formulation

    Limitations : Fluid flow or large strain continuum deformation

    Mesh free particle methods (2003)

    SPH method(1994)

  • 8/9/2019 Fluide Structure Interaction

    4/29

    IMMERSED ELEMENT-FREE GALERKIN METHOD

    (IEFGM)

    Numerical method to model FSI problems involving highly

    flexible solids and slender solid body. Solid domain - updated-Lagrangian IEFG formulation

    The fluid-solid interaction force is represented as a volumetric

    A Lagrangian solid domain moves on top of an Eulerian fluid

    domain which spans over the entire computational region

    Coupling (continuity) between the solid and fluid domains

    Moving Least Squares local approximationMoving Least Squares local approximation

  • 8/9/2019 Fluide Structure Interaction

    5/29

  • 8/9/2019 Fluide Structure Interaction

    6/29

    FORMULATION OF THE IEFGM

    -------------(1)

    Fig. Definition of the solid (Lagrangian) domain and the fluid (Eulerian) domain.

    Eulerian configuration - characterized by the time invariant position vector x,

    Lagrangian configuration - characterized by the current position vector xs

  • 8/9/2019 Fluide Structure Interaction

    7/29

    ASSUMPTIONS :

    The materials in both the solid and fluid domains are

    incompressible No-slip condition between solid and fluid regions

    The union of the two domains can be treated as one continuum

    , ,

    and temperature fields

    The fluid occupies the entire computational domain and that

    the solid domain is placed on top of the fluid domain.

  • 8/9/2019 Fluide Structure Interaction

    8/29

    DOMAIN MODELING

    The fluid domainThe fluid domain - Modelled using the finite element method

    with an Eulerian formulation.positionx

    actual time tThe independent variables

    velocity v

    pressure p

    temperature T

    The dependent variables

  • 8/9/2019 Fluide Structure Interaction

    9/29

    DOMAIN MODELING

    The solid domainThe solid domain - modelled using the element-free Galerkinmethod with an updated-Lagrangian formulation

    pos onx

    actual time t,

    particles displacement us

    us defined as the difference between the current and previous

    position.

    The independent variables

    The dependent variables

  • 8/9/2019 Fluide Structure Interaction

    10/29

    GOVERNING EQUATIONSSolid domain

    The solid domain is assumed to be fully submerged into the

    fluid domain at all times, it is considered to be incompressible,and it moves at the same speed as the fluid domain (non-slip

    condition between fluid and solid)

    Where, fiFSI,s Fluidstructure interaction force

    The fluidstructure interaction force is treated as an additional

    body force acting on the solid

  • 8/9/2019 Fluide Structure Interaction

    11/29

    Computational domain

    Momentum equation for the entire computational domainNavierStokes equation

    ------- (3)

    GOVERNING EQUATIONS

    Computational domain is incompressibleIncompressibility constrain ----- (4)

    Equation 3,4---- Strong forms of the governing equation for the

    following domain

  • 8/9/2019 Fluide Structure Interaction

    12/29

    COUPLING BETWEEN THE SOLID AND FLUIDDOMAINS

    Coupling = Development of a numerical code capable of

    simulating fluidsolid interaction problems with the IEFGformulation

    Two critical variables relevant to this coupling are

    1. Solid domain Velocit vs x t and

    2. The interaction force acting upon the fluid in the overlapping domain fFSI

    --- - -- - -- -- - -- - (5).

    - - - - - - (6) .

  • 8/9/2019 Fluide Structure Interaction

    13/29

    COUPLING BETWEEN THE SOLID AND FLUID

    DOMAINSLocal Approximation of x component of fluid model

    a) local approximation of the x-component of the fluid nodal velocity (v,x).

    b) Influence domains associated with each node

  • 8/9/2019 Fluide Structure Interaction

    14/29

    --------------- -- - -- -- - -- - (5) .

    COUPLING BETWEEN THE SOLID AND FLUID

    DOMAINS

    - - - - - - (6) .

    -----------(7) .

  • 8/9/2019 Fluide Structure Interaction

    15/29

    DISTRIBUTION OF THE INTERACTION FORCE, FFSI,

    IN THE FLUID DOMAIN

    -------(8) .

    --------(9) .

  • 8/9/2019 Fluide Structure Interaction

    16/29

    NUMERICAL EXAMPLES

    Case 1:

    Infinitely rigid solid disk falling by gravity while submerged in aviscous Newtonian fluid

    Case 2:

    -

  • 8/9/2019 Fluide Structure Interaction

    17/29

    The properties of the solid disk

    Disk dia = 2mm density = 12,000 kg/m3

    Poisons ratio = 0.3

    CASE 1 : INFINITELY RIGID SOLID DISK FALLING

    The properties of the fluid

    Density = 8800 kg/m3

    l = 2.0e3 N s/m2.

    The Eulerian grid consisted of 3321 rectangular bilinear

    elements (10 mm wide X 20 mm high)

  • 8/9/2019 Fluide Structure Interaction

    18/29

    CASE 1 : INFINITELY RIGID SOLID DISK FALLING

  • 8/9/2019 Fluide Structure Interaction

    19/29

    CASE 1 : INFINITELY RIGID SOLID DISK FALLING

  • 8/9/2019 Fluide Structure Interaction

    20/29

    COMPARISON WITH ANALYTICAL SOLUTION

    The average solid velocity

    The analytical velocity

  • 8/9/2019 Fluide Structure Interaction

    21/29

    Comparison between the velocity histories of a rigid solid disk

    falling in a viscous fluid

    COMPARISON WITH ANALYTICAL SOLUTION

  • 8/9/2019 Fluide Structure Interaction

    22/29

  • 8/9/2019 Fluide Structure Interaction

    23/29

  • 8/9/2019 Fluide Structure Interaction

    24/29

    CASE 2 : SOFT DISK FALLING IN A VISCOUS FLUID

    a) Position and shape of the solid body at nine different times are shown,

    b)

  • 8/9/2019 Fluide Structure Interaction

    25/29

    CASE 2 : SOFT DISK FALLING IN A VISCOUS FLUID

  • 8/9/2019 Fluide Structure Interaction

    26/29

    CONCLUSIONS

    Very robust for modelling the fluid dynamics of flexible slender

    bodies.

    Large rotations, translations and deformations of the solid body

    can be captured

    represents an important factor affecting the movement of thefluid. Details of the velocity field and the shape and position of

    the solid domain as a function of time, which for the highly thin

    and flexible film shown in this work would be difficult to model

    with finite element-based formulations, were effectively

    captured by the IEFG method

  • 8/9/2019 Fluide Structure Interaction

    27/29

    REFERENCES1. APPLICATIONS OF THE IMMERSED ELEMENT-FREE GALERKIN

    METHOD, Claudio M. Pita, Sergio D. Felicelli, Department of

    Mechanical Engineering, Mississippi State University, USA

    2. Comparison of various fluidstructure interaction methods for

    deformable bodies , Computers & Structures,Volume 85, Issues

    11-14, June-July 2007, Pages 833-843

    3.

    Coupling of the improved element-free Galerkin and boundaryelement methods for two-dimensional elasticity problems

    Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, Volume 32, Issue 2,

    February 2008, Pages 100-107

    4.

    On the use of element-free Galerkin Method for problems involvingincompressibility, Engineering Analysis with BoundaryElements,

    Volume 31, Issue 2, February 2007, Pages 103-115

  • 8/9/2019 Fluide Structure Interaction

    28/29

  • 8/9/2019 Fluide Structure Interaction

    29/29

    LAGRANGIAN BACKGROUND MESH

    Detail of the Lagrangian background mesh for the solid disk on top of the Eulerian

    fluid mesh