Upload
vokhuong
View
230
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Flow-formed, thin-walled aluminium cylindrical shells as substructures for aerospace applications
Due to their high load-bearing
capacity in combination with minimal
structural weight, thin-walled shell
structures made of aluminium are
frequently used in the aerospace
industry. Non-reinforced shell
structures are sensitive to
imperfections, i.e. even minor
deviations from the geometrically
perfect structure, although these are
still within production tolerances,
cause a significant reduction in the
buckling load of the shell. The
geometric imperfections vary and are
unknown during the design phase, so
that a reliable buckling load forecast
is only partly possible.
In connection with current research
projects at the Institut für
Strukturmechanik und Leichtbau of
RWTH Aachen (Institute for Structure
Mechanics and Light Construction at the
RWTH Aachen University (Rheinisch-
Westfälische Technische Hochschule
Aachen)), methods and procedures for
the design of the shell structures of
launch vehicles such as e.g. the
European civilian launch vehicles of the
ARIANE and VEGA series are further
developed. In particular, the influences
of the installation condition and the type
of load application, which so far have
only been partly taken into account, on
the structural-mechanical characteristic
behaviour of the shell structure are to be
investigated numerically as well as
experimentally. For experimental
preliminary investigations, test bodies
are to be produced that are to meet the
following requirements:
• High precision, i.e. minimal
geometric imperfections of the
shell structures
• Minimal wall thickness of the
shell so that the load to be
applied in the laboratory is
within a manageable range
• High strength properties of the
aluminium, in order to avoid any
plastic buckling of the shell
structure
In order to be able to realize a scaled
structure representative for aerospace
applications, the radius of the shell was
selected to be 160 mm and the wall
thickness of the shell to be 0.2 mm. The
length of the shell was defined to be 160,
so that the influence of boundary
conditions on the buckling load can be
considered to be negligible. This
structure was examined numerically,
with various different imperfections
taken into account, and geometric non-
linear static calculations as well as
dynamically explicit calculations being
carried out with finite elements
software. The buckling course occurring
as a result is shown in Figure 1. With an
increasing load (see Figure 1 a. to f.),
initially a local dent forms which then
causes a global failure of the structure.
This and additional theoretical
verification actions are to be compared
with the results of structure-mechanical
tests, carried out in the structure
laboratory of the Institut für
Strukturmechanik und Leichtbau
(Institute for Structure Mechanics and
Light Construction) of RWTH Aachen, in
order to validate the numerical models.
Figure 1 Course of buckling in the reference
structure - dynamically explicit finite elements
calculation
Furthermore, a device was designed
which is able to record with high
precision the geometric imperfections
and wall thickness variations. The data
record measured can then be
transferred to structural-mechanical
models, and in this way it is then
possible to improve the forecast
precision for the theoretically
determined buckling loads. In addition
the insights gained thereby can be used
for the further development of the
production process.
The above-mentioned demanding
requirements for the test bodies can be
realized by flow forming.
Flow forming is probably the most
interesting forming process for the
production of highest quality,
rotationally symmetric components. It
provides for a high utilization of
material, offers extreme geometric
freedoms and almost completely
exhausts the strength potential of the
materials. EMS (formerly Pronexos)
offers additional value with customized
special solutions in the sectors
aerospace, medical technologies or
automotive.
This very flexible, non-cutting
production process, which allows thin-
walled, seamless pipes, cylinders and
other axially symmetric components to
be produced with maximum precision,
in a wide area of formable material
applications, offers an extremely high
wall thickness reduction from the initial
state, up to prefabricated components
with a wall thickness of just a few tenth
of a mm.
Figure 2 shows a high precision
aluminium pipe with a wall thickness of
0.5 mm (internal diameter ID= 160 mm),
which corresponds to a total pre-
product forming of 87.5%.
The principle of flow forming is a cold
massive forming, causing the initial
strength of the materials to be increased.
The high degree of forming and the
extreme reinforcement, i.e. the increase
in specific strength, are possible only
due to this process being based on
forming by compressive stress. Other
processes act by tensile stress.
Figure 2 Preliminary product right (length 200
mm, wall thickness: 4mm)
In the case of this non-cutting process, a
workpiece is formed by using rollers at
high pressure. A mandrel is used as a
mould and represents the internal
geometry of the finished component.
Thus, in order to obtain the shell
required – in principle, a pipe section -,
the preliminary form shown in Fig. 2,
made of aluminium (AlMg2,7Mn, Fig. 2
right), is applied to the mandrel which
also features a cylindrical form. In
general, the components can be
cylindrical but also “flat” or pot-shaped.
By means of a so-called driver, which is
formed beyond the mandrel, this
mandrel sets the preliminary product in
rotation. By means of this counter-
direction process it is therefore possible
to produce very long precision pipes as
the forming is fully complete before the
pipe leaves the mould. The rollers
themselves are not driven; they run in a
counter-direction to the workpiece.
Schematically, the process of the so-
called three-roller flow forming is
shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3 Schematic of the three-roller flow
forming in front view
For the material, initially, this means a
plastic tensile stretching, than a stress
reversal up to compression under the
feed angle of the roller, and then it runs
back to the stress-free area under the
radius of the roller, where the stored
elastic energy can be removed. This
process is effected several times
underneath a roller, before the next
roller is used.
Figure 4 shows the finished flow-formed
aluminium pipe in the vertical flow
forming machine.
Figure 4 Finished product AlMg2,7Mn in the
vertical flow forming machine
The final wall thickness of the pipe after
flow forming was 0.5 mm, which, for the
purposes of this test, was then reduced
to 0.2 mm by turning and shortened to
the corresponding length of the shells.
Due to the forming process, the
aluminium pipe now features strengths
(Rm) of up to 366 MPa. Also, the yield
strength (Rp0,2) is comparatively high
with values up to 345 MPa.
Following manufacturing, the shells
were prepared by EMS for initial
preliminary tests. In order to ensure an
even load introduction, the upper and
lower edge of the shell are moulded with
resin in a rigid aluminium ring, and in
this way the usual boundary conditions
for shell buckling tests are realized, see
Figure 5.
After the shell buckling tests as well as
the steps described above have been
carried out, scaled structures taking into
account adjacent structures and the
connection technology representative
for launch vehicles are to be designed,
numerically examined and finally tested,
in order to provide for an improved
understanding of the structure-
mechanical behaviour of shell structures
and their design.
Figure 5 Moulded shell prepared for the shell
buckling tests
The production of the second set of test
bodies will again be effected by means of
a cooperation between the Institut für
Strukturmechanik und Leichtbau
(Institute for Structure Mechanics and
Light Construction) of RWTH Aachen
and EMS. For it is particularly for this
type of application that the advantages
of flow forming are obvious:
• Low production costs • Maximum material utilization • Very minor mechanical (re)-machining
of the components • Complex geometries • Very thin wall thicknesses • Very exact internal and external
surfaces • Very good surface quality • Cold forming possible even with
maximum strength materials (pressure forming)
Authors:
M.Eng. Linus Friedrich, Research Associate at the Institut für Strukturmechanik und Leichtbau (Institute for Structure Mechanics and
Light Construction) RWTH Aachen University
M.Sc. Maike Blankartz, Marketing Engineer at EMS (formerly Pronexos)
This article was published in Aluminium Praxis, 10/2015
www.ems-evolves.com