Upload
damian-reeves
View
219
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Florence Rouyer, Sylvie Cohen-Addad, Reinhard Höhler
Aqueous foams have complex rheological properties. They show elastic behavior when subjected to stresses below a yield stress and they flow as non-Newtonian fluids for stresses beyond this characteristic value. The yielding behavior may depend on the flow history of the sample and the flow geometry of the experiment, possibly involving strain localization effects. These phenomena as well as the difficulty to characterize fully the relevant structural and physicochemical properties of a foam may explain the discrepancy between experimentally obtained values of the yield stress that can be found in the literature.
Influence of flow geometry
Large oscillatory strains in a cylindrical Couette cell Inclined Plane
y = (1- )g sin h = (1- )g sin hf
hf
z
h
45° 45°
hf
Gillette 81%
(Coussot et al, 1996)
z
y
xz(1- )g sin (zmax-z)
y
y
gh
x(Di Federico, 1999)
Inclined Plane Oscillatory strain
0
50
100
0.7 0.8 0.9 1
y
Gas volume fraction
(f =1Hz)
f21mm
25mm 5 mm
0.0015
0.002
0.0025
0 0.5 1 1.5
Localization
r + rr
s
r s /r – s/r
r 1/r2
s(r)
/sm
ax
1/r2
(mm
-2)
r (mm) (r)
= .5 = .7
= .5 = .7
0
0.5
1
21 22 23 24 25
= .9
• Strain localization is observed around = 0.6 0.1, well beyond yielding.
• Non-monotonous strain variation is a precursor of shear-banding.
• Localization is not located near the moving wall.
• Similar to observations in emulsions (Mason et al., 96).
•Yield stress data do not depend on the geometry
• Inclined plane set-up is not well adapted to the study of dry foam.
Effects of controlled stress or strain and frequency
Comparison with the literature
• Plotting y /G'0 allows to avoid uncertainties due to T and R determination.
•.With this scaling, our results agree with previous ones (St Jalmes, Durian 1999, Mason et al. 1995 & 1996).
• Low frequency oscillatory measurements of y/G'0 give values different from that of steady shear
measurements. Possible effect of localization in steady shear ?
0.1
1
0.01 0.1 1 10
G'/G'0 and G"/G'0
gamma*G'0/sigmaY
0.05
0.15
0.25
0.1 1 10
gammaY
frequence
G'/ G'0
G'' / G'0
y Frequency (Hz)
Controlled stress strain
y
y / G'0
• Controlled stress or strain experiments give similar results.
• y y / G'0
zmax
0
Elasto-plastic model
Gillette 92%, 0.3 Hz
Yie
ld S
trai
n
Nor
mal
ized
She
ar M
odul
us
s : curvilinear coordinate
smax
Shear-banding
1
10
100
1 10 100y
G'
G''
G'0
G''0
Stress amplitude (Pa)
Gillette 92%
Shea
r M
odul
us (
Pa)
-0.25
0
0.25
0 1 2 3 4
time (s)
-60
0
60
0 1 2 3 4
(Pa)
time (s)
Stre
ss
S
trai
n
Time (s)
-100
0
100
0 1 2 3 4
(Pa)
time (s)
-0.8
0
0.8
0 1 2 3 4
time (s)
Time (s)
Small amplitude Large amplitude
0
0.2
0.4
0.8 0.9 1
y
/G' 0
expe
rim
ents
Sim
u-
lati
ons
To ConcludeYielding measurement do not depend on geometry and controlled parameter (stress or strain), in the quasi-static regime .Shear modulus behavior of non-dissipative and dry foam is well described by the elasto-plastic model, but this model does not capture all the anharmonicity of the response.In low frequency oscillatory experiments, where localization effects can be excluded, yield strain is equal to yield stress divided by elastic shear modulus measured at small amplitude. The yield strain seems to be well defined for foams and emulsions, and varies as (c)/ .
Strain observation of the free sample surface in a Couette cell
()()()()()()()()()000000000ReRe*,*,',",2*,ititTittetGetGGiGGtedtTωωωγγσγγωσγωγωγωγωσγ−⎡⎤=⎣⎦⎡⎤=+Δ⎣⎦=+=∫
()()()20yy0' /' where 0.64ccccTTGRRGφφφσφφσφφφφ⇓ − −∝ ∝−≈∝1444444442444444443
Comparison with the elasto-plastic model *
* Weaire & Hutzler, 1999
0.1
1
0.01 0.1 1 10
G'/G'0 and G"/G'0
gamma*G'/sigmaY
Foam1 92%
gillette 92.5%
Foam2 93%
Influence of physico-chemical properties
0.1
1
0.01 0.1 1 10
G'/G'0 and G"/G'0
gamma*G'0/sigmaY
Foam1 92%
Foam1 97%
y
G0 y
2 4 6 8 10 12
-1
-0.5
0.5
1
2 4 6 8 10 12
-1
-0.5
0.5
1
y
time
time
(t)
(t)0.1 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10
0.05
0.1
0.2
0.5
1
2
0.1 1 10
y
G'/ G0
G'' / G0
1
0.1
y= y /G0
Stress Residual
• The complex shear modulus is well described by the elasto-plastic model, all the more if the foam is dry and weakly dissipative.
----- SGR (Sollich 98)___ Elasto-plastic
f
gillette 30 min 1 Hz gillette 30 min .3 Hz 0.92 gillette 60 min 1 Hz foam1 1 Hz foam1 .3 Hz 0.97
r
0.1
1
0.01 0.1 1 10
G'/G'0 et G"/G'0
gamma/gammaYy
Foam 1:
Solution :AOK, PEO, LOH
Gas : N2 + perfluorohexan
produced in a porous tube
Bubble Radius: R = 23 µm
Surface tension : = 27 mN/m
Foam characteristics
Foam 2:
Solution :TTAB, glycerol, LOH
Gas : N2 + perfluorohexan
produced by whipping
Bubble Radius: R = 18 µm
Surface tension : T= 37 mN/m
Nor
mal
ized
She
ar M
odul
usG
'' / G
' 0
&
G
'/ G
' 0G
'' / G
' 0
&
G
'/ G
' 0
G''
/ G' 0
&
G'/
G' 0
Localization onset Localization onset
Gillette:
Commercial shaving cream
Bubble Radius: R = 10 µm
Surface tension : = 30 mN/m0.1
1
0.1 1
G'/G'0 and G"/G'0
sigma/sigmaY
Foam1 92%
gillette 92.5%
Foam2 93%
()()()()()0022Re*,ittGettresidualtωσγγωσσσ⎡⎤=+Δ⎣⎦Δ=∫∫
G''
/ G' 0
&
G'/
G' 0
yy
0.1
1
0.1 1
'G'/G'0 and G"/G'0
sigma / sigmaY
Foam1 92%
Foam1 97%
y
G''
/ G' 0
&
G'/
G' 0
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
0.01 0.1 1 10
residual
gamma/gammaY
resi
dual
y
• Elasto-plastic residual overestimates experimental values.
• SGR model residual agrees with experimental values, but experimental values of G' and G'' are not well described by this model.
emulsions
Princen, Kiss (1986 &1989)
Mason et al. (1995 & 1996) *
Mason et al. (1995 & 1996)
* * * oscillatory measurements
foams
St Jalmes, Durian (1999) *
Khan (1988)
Gillette *
Foam1 *
Gopal, Durian (1999)
Kraynik et al. (2000)
Durian (1995)
This work was presented at the 5th European Conference in foam, emulsions and applications, Champs-sur-Marne, France, July 2004.
Is the yield stress of aqueous foam a well defined quantity ?Is the yield stress of aqueous foam a well defined quantity ?