FIVE YEAR REVIEW

Q O R EP R O P E R T Y S C I E N C E S

Five-Year Review Report

First Five-Year Review ReportFor

Normandy Park Apartments Site11110 North 56th StreetTemple Terrace, Florida

September 2006

PREPARED BY:

QORE Property Sciences1211 Tech Blvd., Suite 200

Tampa, FL33619

FOR:

United States Environmental Protection AgencyRegion 4

Atlanta, Georgia

Approved by: K ft Date:

Jeverly W BanisterActing Director, Waste Management DivisionU.S. EPA, Region 4

111 I Tech Blvd. Suite 200 Tampa, Florida 33619 (813)623-6646 fax (81 3) 623-3795

Hill10448846

U . S . E P A R E G I O N I V

SDMS

POOR LEGIBILITY

PORTIONS OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BEDIFFICULT TO VIEW DUE TO THE QUALITY OF

THE ORIGINAL.

TO MAKE THE DOCUMENT R E A D A B L E , TRYONE OR MORE OF THE F O L L O W I N G :

From the Disp lays Se t t ings in Windows Con t ro l P a n e l :1. Set the Color Q u a l i t y to the h i g h e s t a v a i l a b l e : 24 bit or 36 b i t .2. Increase or decrease the Screen resolut ion.

From the M o n i t o r / D i s p l a y Cont ro l s :1. For dark image page, increase the b r i g h t n e s s and decrease the

contras t .2. For l i g h t image page, decrease the b r i gh tne s s and increase the

contras t .

** PLEASE CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE RECORDS CENTER TO VIEW THE MATERIAL**

V. 2-040506

FIRST FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT FOR NORMANDY PARK APARTMENTS SITE

11110 NORTH 56th STREET TEMPLE TERRACE, FLORIDA

QORE Project No. 2148M

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF ACRONYMS iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY v FIVE-YEAR REVIEW SUMMARY FORM vi

I. INTRODUCTION 1

II. SITE CHRONOLOGY 2

III. BACKGROUND 3 Physical Characteristics 3 Land and Resource Use 3 History of Contamination 3 Initial Response 3 Basis for Taking Action 4

IV. REMEDIAL ACTIONS 4 Remedy Selection 4 Remedy Implementation 5 Operation and Maintenance 6

V. PROGRESS SINCE LAST 5-YEAR REVIEW 8

VI. FIVE-YEAR REVIEW PROCESS 8 Administrative Components 8 Community Involvement 8 Document Review 9 Data Review 9 Site Inspection 10 Interviews 10

VII. TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT 11 Question A: Is the remedy functioning as intended by the decision documents? 11 Question B. Are the exposure assumption, toxicity data, cleanup target levels, and remedial action objectives (RAQs) used at the time of the remedy selection still valid? 12 Question C: Has any other information come to light that could call into question the protectiveness of the remedy? 12

VIII. ISSUES 12 ii

IX. RECOMMENDATIONS AND FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS 13

X. PROTECTIVENESS STATEMENT 14

XI. NEXT REVIEW 14

TABLES

Table 1 - Chronology of Site Events 2 Table 2- Annual System Operations/O&M Costs 8 Table 3 - List of Interviewees 10 Table 4- Issues 12 Table 5 - Recommendations and Follow-Up Actions 13

PLATES

Location Map Plate 1 Apartment Complex Layout Plate 2 Areas Excavated Plate 3 Monitor Well Locations Plate 4

APPENDICES

April 2006 Sampling Report Appendix A Public Notice Appendix B Listing of Reports Reviewed Appendix C Site Inspection Checklist Appendix D Interview Form Appendix E Restrictive Covenant Appendix F Soil Sampling Results, Tree Preservation Areas Appendix G Lead and Antimony Concentration Charts Appendix H Site Photographs Appendix I

iii

LIST OF ACRONYMS

AOC Administrative Order of Consent ARAR Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirement CD Consent Decree CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act CFR Code of Federal Regulations EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency FDEP Florida Department of Environmental Protection FFS Focused Feasibility Study GCR Gulf Coast Recycling, Inc. HCEPC Hillsborough County Environmental Commission MCL Maximum Contaminant Level NCP National Contingency Plan NPL National Priorities List O&M Operation and Maintenance OHM OHM Remediation Services Corporation PQL Practical Quantitation Level QORE QORE, Inc. RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act RD Remedial Design ROD Record of Decision SRI Streamlined Remedial Investigation SDWA Safe Drinking Water Act WRS WRS Infrastructure & Environment, Inc.

iv

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The remedy for the Normandy Park Apartments Site in Temple Terrace, Florida included removalof at least the top two feet of contaminated soil every where the ground surface was exposed,excluding a specified distance around the existing trees, and filling the excavations with clean fill.Tree plazas were constructed of wood, pavers or mulch within the drip line of the existing, maturetrees on site to prevent exposure to contaminated soil. Monitored natural attenuation was selectedfor contaminated ground water and institutional controls were implemented to prevent the use ofground water at the site and to notify future owners of the apartment complex of the contaminatedsoil remaining under the site structures (including paved areas and sidewalks). Constructionactivities were completed and described in the Remedial Action Construction Report dated January25, 2002. The trigger for this five-year review was the actual start of remedial activities on March19. 2001.

The assessment of this five-year review found that the remedy was constructed in accordance withthe requirements of the Record of Decision (ROD) and the remedy is functioning as designed. Theimmediate threat of exposure to contaminated soil has been addressed and the remedy is expectedto be protective when ground water cleanup goals are achieved through monitored naturalattenuation.

v

Five-Year Review Summary Form

SITE IDENTIFICATION

Site name (from WasteLAN): Normandy Park Apartments Site

EPA ID (from WasteLAN): FLD984229773

Region: IV State: Florida City/County: Temple Terrace/Hillsborouqh County

SITE STATUS

NPL status: r Final r Deleted r Other (specify) Proposed but deferred in exchange for cooperation

Remediation status (choose all that apply): T Under Construction T Operating r Complete

Multiple Oils?- r YES r NO Construction completion date: 11 / 2001

Has site been put into reuse? r YES r NO

REVIEW STATUS

Lead agency: T EPA r State T Tribe T Other Federal Agency

Author name: Lawrence Maron & William Denman

Author title: LM: Senior Principal ConsultantWD: Remedial Project Manager

Author affiliation: LM: QORE Property SciencesWD: U.S. EPA

Review period:" 07/15/2005 to 03/19/2006

Date(s) of site inspection: 12 / 13/2005

Type of review:r Post-SARA T Pre-SARA r NPL-Removal onlyT Non-NPL Remedial Action Site r NPL State/Tribe-leadr Regional Discretion

Review number r 1 (first) r 2 (second) r 3 (third) r Other (specify)

Triggering action:F Actual RA On-site Construction at SiteF Construction Completionr Other (specify)

T Actual RA Start at OU#F Previous Five-Year Review Report

Triggering action date (from WasteLAN): 03 /19 / 2001

Due date (five years after triggering action date): 03 /19 / 2006* ["OU" refers to operable unit.]** [Review period should correspond to the actual start and end dates of the Five-Year Review in WasteLAN.]

- VI -

Five-Year Review Summary Form, cont'd

Issues:

Maintenance and management personnel at the facility were unaware of the presence ofcontaminated soil under the tree plazas, sidewalks, pavement, tennis courts and buildings. Asa result, they were unaware of the need to maintain the tree plazas and of procedures to followin the event contaminated soil is exposed. New tenants are also not being informed of the pastremedial actions at the site and the presence of contaminated soil on site, even though the riskof exposure is very low.

Recommendations and Follow-up Actions:

Maintenance and management personnel were informed of the presence of contaminated soilremaining on site and the procedures to follow in the event the soils are exposed. A writtendescription as to the presence and location of contaminated soils should be prepared to provideinstruction in the event the current maintenance and management personnel are replaced. Thewritten description should include the steps to follow and people to notify in the eventcontaminated soil will be exposed. A one-page handout should also be prepared to provide tonew and prospective tenants to inform them of the site conditions and history.

Protectiveness Statement(s):

The remedy is expected to be protective of human health and the environment after the groundwater cleanup goals are achieved through monitored natural attenuation.

Other Comments:

The issue of the management and maintenance personnel not being aware of the presence ofcontaminated soil was caused by recent personnel changes. These personnel were notified ofthe presence of contaminated soil and restrictions on exposing the contaminated soil duringthe on-site interviews. No disturbance to the tree plazas or other structures had occurred sincethe remedial action was completed.

vii

FIRST FIVE YEAR REVIEW REPORT Normandy Park Apartments Site

11110 North 56th Street Temple Terrace, FL

I. INTRODUCTION

The purpose of Five-Year reviews is to determine whether the remedy at a site is protective ofhuman health and the environment. The methods, findings, and conclusions of reviews aredocumented in Five-Year Review reports. In addition, Five-Year Review reports identify issuesfound during the review, if any, and recommendations to address them.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is preparing this Five-Year review pursuant toCERCLA § 121 and the National Contingency Plan (NCP). CERCLA § 121 states:

If the President selects a remedial action that results in any hazardous substances,pollutants, or contaminants remaining at the site, the President shall review such remedialaction no less often than each five years after the initiation of such remedial action to assurethat human health and the environment are being protected by the remedial action beingimplemented. In addition, if upon such review it is the judgment of the President that actionis appropriate at such site in accordance with section [104] or [106], the President shalltake or require such action. The President shall report to the Congress a list of facilities forwhich such review is required, the results of all such reviews, and any actions taken as aresult of such reviews.

The EPA interpreted this requirement further in the NCP; 40 CFR § 300.430(f)(4)(ii) states:

If a remedial action is selected that results in hazardous substances, pollutants, orcontaminants remaining at the site above levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestrictedexposure, the lead agency shall review such action no less often than every five years afterthe initiation of the selected remedial action.

The EPA Region 4 has conducted a Five-Year review of the remedial actions implemented at theNormandy Park Apartments Site in Temple Terrace, Florida. The time period covered by this reviewwas July 15, 2001 through March 19, 2006. The Normandy Park Apartments Site Five-Year Reviewwas led by Mr. William Denman of the EPA, Remedial Project Manager for the Normandy ParkApartments Site, and included employees from QORE, Inc. (QORE), under the direction of Mr.Lawrence J. Maron, P. E. QORE is the environmental consulting firm that prepared the StreamlinedRemedial Investigation, and developed and oversaw the remedial action. This report documents theresults of the review.

This is the first Five-Year review for the Normandy Park Apartments Site. The triggering action forthis review is the initiation of the remedial action on March 19, 2001. There are no operable unitsat the site. The Five-Year review is required due to the fact that hazardous substances, pollutants,or contaminants remain at the site above levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestrictedexposure.

First Five-Year Review Report September 25, 2006Normandy Park Apartments Site - Gulf Coast Recycling, Inc. Page 2

II. SITE CHRONOLOGY

Table 1 - Chronology of Site Events Event Date

Hillsborough County Environmental Protection Commission requests Gulf CoastRecycling (GCR) to conduct subsurface environmental testing

8/1991

The Florida Department of Environmental Regulation, now known as the FloridaDepartment of Environmental Protection (FDEP), referred the site to the EPA

2/1992

The EPA performed surface and subsurface sampling 2/25- 2/26/92

GCR entered an Administrative Order of Consent (AOC) with EPA to abate theimmediate threat of exposure to apartment residents

6/1992

OHM Remediation Services Corporation (OHM) submitted a Removal Action Plan 8/1992

The Site was proposed for inclusion in the National Priority List (NPL) 2/13/1995

Interim abatement actions were constructed - Concrete caps were put in place, a fencewas erected and a wooden decking system was constructed

10/1995

EPA issued a special notice letter to GCR to conduct a Streamlined RemedialInvestigation (SRI), Focused Feasibility Study (FFS) and Risk Assessment at the site

5/12/1998

GCR entered into an AOC to conduct the SRI/FFS 9/30/1998

GCR completed the SRI/FFS 1999

Remedial design start 4/1999

Remedial design complete 6/30/1999

The SRI/FFS were made available to the public and the proposed plan identifyingEPA's preferred remedy released to the public for comment

2/17/2000

Record of Decision (ROD) selecting the remedy is signed 5/11/2000

Remedial Design(RD)/Remedial Action (RA) Work Plan submitted to EPA 2/13/2001

Remedial Action construction started 3/19/2001

Remedial Design/Remedial Action Work Plan approved by EPA 5/10/2001

Consent Degree (CD) and Statement of Work filed 6/22/2001

Remedial Action construction completed 11/2001

Remedial Action Construction Report completed 1/25/2002


III. BACKGROUND

Physical Characteristics

The Normandy Park Apartments Site occupies approximately 8.25 acres approximately ¼ mile southof Fowler Avenue between 56th Street and 53rd Street in the City of Temple Terrace, HillsboroughCounty, Florida (Plate 1). The street address is 11110 North 56th Street. The Site is currentlydeveloped with a 144 residential unit apartment complex. All portions of the site not covered withapartment structures, swimming pools, tennis court, paved parking and roadways, are either grassed,mulched or covered with tree plazas. The layout of the apartment complex is shown on Plate 2.

Land and Resource Use

From 1953 until 1963, GCR operated a battery recycling and secondary lead smelting facility at thesite. In 1970, GCR built the Normandy Park Apartments on the property, which remain to date.

The current and the future expected use of the Site is residential. The surrounding area is a mixtureof commercial and residential properties, and it is anticipated that this will continue into the future.

Private water-supply wells that are used as a drinking water source are not known to be present inthe immediate area of the site. The area has been developed for many years and municipal water issupplied. Future use of ground water in the area is anticipated to remain the same.

History of Contamination

GCR owned the Site from 1953 until June 2001. During the battery recycling and secondary leadsmelting operational period, GCR followed standard industry practices. At the facility, tops of spentlead batteries were chopped off by a hydraulic guillotine or cracked open by some other means. Thelead plates were separated and processed for recycling, and the battery casings were disposed. Thelead plates were smelted on-site. The process resulted in the release of sulfuric acid and lead intothe environment.

The contamination was discovered in August 1991. In response to a citizen's complaint, theHillsborough County Environmental Protection Commission (HCEPC) investigated the Site. Theanalysis of samples collected by the HCEPC revealed the presence of lead in on-site soils atconcentrations of up to 35,000 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) and in the ground water atconcentrations at up to 16.7 milligrams per liter (mg/l). In January 1992, private blood test resultsfor three children living at the apartments were publicized. The blood lead concentrations werereportedly 9, 10, and 12 micrograms per deciliter (µg/dl) per unit of whole blood. Two of the threechildren's blood level results were slightly above or equal to the Center for Disease Control'srecommended level of 10 µg/dl lead per unit of whole blood. In February 1992, the FDEP referredthe Site to the EPA. Sampling conducted by the EPA confirmed widespread lead contaminationthroughout the Site in levels that threatened human health and the environment.

Initial Response

Under the direction of EPA's Emergency Response and Removal program, GCR placed concretecaps over two areas significantly affected by battery recycling operations in the northern courtyard


of the apartment complex. In the southern courtyard, a fence was erected around the entirecourtyard. Eventually, a wooden decking system was constructed over the entire southern courtyardto prevent direct contact with affected soil. The wood decking system was completed in October1995.

The Site was proposed for inclusion on the NPL in February 1995. The EPA, however, used itsenforcement discretion to defer placing the Site on the NPL in exchange for GCR's cooperation.GCR and EPA entered into an Administrative Order on Consent on September 30, 1998. Theconsent order required the preparation of a site specific Health and Safety Plan, a Quality AssuranceProject Plan, and a Streamlined Remedial Investigation (SRI)/Focused Feasibility Study (FFS) WorkPlan. QORE submitted a Health and Safety Plan and Quality Assurance Project Plan to EPA onSeptember 23, 1998. QORE and Environmental Consulting & Technology, Inc. submitted an SRIWork Plan to the EPA in September 1998. The Work Plan was approved by the EPA andincorporated into the Consent Order. The SRI and FFS reports and proposed plan for the NormandyPark Apartments Site were made available to the public in February 2000.

Basis for Taking Action

Contaminants

Hazardous substances that have been released at the site in each media include:

Soil Ground Water - Surficial Aquifer Antimony Antimony Arsenic Lead Lead

Based on results of the risk assessment and on comparison of the detected contaminantconcentrations to enforceable, health based standards, site related contaminants were present in thesurface soil and ground water at the Normandy Park Apartments Site in concentrations which didpose significant noncarcinogenic risks to human health. At many locations throughout the Site, theon-site surface soil contained concentrations of lead above the acceptable level, as determined bythe risk assessment, of 420 mg/kg. In addition, antimony and lead were present in the on-sitesurficial ground water at levels exceeding their respective drinking water standards of 0.015 mg/lfor lead and 0.006 mg/l for antimony.

IV. REMEDIAL ACTIONS

Remedy Selection

The ROD for the Normandy Park Apartments Site was signed on May 11, 2000. The remedial actionobjective for soil contaminants at the Normandy Park Apartments Site was to remove and treat, ifnecessary, the top two feet of soil throughout the apartment complex and replace with clean fill,thereby eliminating the potential for exposure to surface soil contaminants. The existing concretecaps installed pursuant to the EPA emergency response action, the existing buildings, and the asphaltparking lots would remain in place to act as caps, preventing exposure to the soil underneath.Institutional controls would be used to ensure the soil underneath these structures will be properlytreated if the land use changes.


The remedial action objective for ground water was to remove the highly contaminated soil in thesouthern courtyard, which was a contributing source of ground water contamination. Since removalof this significant source, monitoring of the ground water has taken place to ensure it naturallyattenuates to below the cleanup levels.

The EPA selected a preferred remedy consisting of Excavation, On-Site Screening, Ex-SituStabilization, Off-Site Disposal, Monitored Natural Attenuation, and Institutional Controls. Thepreferred remedy required the following:

• Excavation of all exposed soil to a depth of two feet, with the exception of a twenty footradius around the existing trees

• Removal of the deck in the southern complex and the soil excavated to the water table or asdeep as possible without jeopardizing the structural stability of the adjacent swimming pooland apartment buildings

• Placement of a permeable liner at the base of the excavated areas • Filling of all excavated areas with clean soil to pre-excavation grade and sodding • Temporary storage of excavated soil in the open field south of the apartments to allow

screening of the soils for compliance with Landfill Disposal Regulations under the ResourceConservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

• On-site treatment of the soil stored in the open field via ex-situ stabilization if the screeningindicates that the soil does not meet the Landfill Disposal Regulations

• Off-site disposal of treated and untreated soil in a regulated landfill • Monitored natural attenuation of the ground water contaminants • Institutional controls to limit future use of soil and ground water

Remedy Implementation

The Remedial Action (RA) work was awarded to WRS Infrastructure & Environment, Inc. (WRS),located in Tampa, Florida. WRS began mobilizing to the site on March 19, 2001. The following arethe major components of the RA that were implemented:

• WRS removed the wood deck present in the southern complex and excavated soil up toseven feet below ground surface (bgs)

• The excavated soil from this area was treated with Portland cement and tri-sodium phosphatefor disposal.

• WRS excavated soil in the central and northern apartment complexes to a depth of two feetbgs.

• All soil excavated was transported to a Class I Industrial Landfill in Okeechobee, Florida.• A non-woven polypropylene fabric was placed over the bottom and sides of all of the soil

excavations and the excavations filled with a clean fill obtained from an off-site location • A landscaping contractor installed an irrigation system and sodded the excavated areas once

the area was backfilled and graded. • An independent contractor constructed tree plazas consisting of concrete pavers, wood

decking or mulch over the areas being preserved around the existing trees.

The remedial action required by the ROD allowed that soil within a 20-foot radius or the drip-lineof the mature oak trees, whichever was greater, should not be excavated. Instead, these areas wouldbe covered with a tree plaza to prevent contact with the soil. During the implementation of the


remedial action, the EPA agreed that the preservation areas could remain in their existing statewithout the construction of a tree plaza if the total lead concentration in the soil was less than theconcentration established by the residential exposure scenario in the site-specific risk assessmentapproved by the EPA (420 mg/kg). By using this standard, potential damage to the root systems ofthe trees, especially the mature oaks could be avoided. In areas where the soil lead concentration wasless than 420 mg/kg, no tree plaza was constructed, although the area under the large oak tree in thewest end of the central complex courtyard and the area at the east end of the northern complexcourtyard, adjacent to the playground area, were covered with 6 inches of mulch. WRS completedthe construction activities and demobilized August 25, 2001.

The areas that were excavated and the areas in which tree plazas were constructed are shown onPlate 3.

After completion of the remedial action, ground water sampling began to monitor the effect ofnatural attenuation on the ground water quality (see following Operation and Maintenance section).In addition, an easement was obtained that requires EPA and FDEP approval prior to removing ormodifying existing structures that would pose possible exposure to contaminated soil underneath

Operation and Maintenance

Operation and Maintenance (O&M) at the site consists of the collection of ground water sampleson a quarterly basis and maintaining the tree plazas to prevent exposure in areas of elevated leadconcentrations. Ground water sampling requirements were initially identified in the "RevisedSampling and Analysis Plan, Remedial Design Ground Water Sampling, Normandy ParkApartments, Tampa, Florida, for Gulf Coast Recycling" dated February 13, 2001. This sampling andanalysis plan (SAP) was approved by the EPA in a letter dated May 10, 2001.

No specific O&M manual exists with respect to maintenance of the tree plazas; however, quarterlyinspections of the tree plazas will be conducted to assure their integrity and effectiveness. Theseinspections will coincide with the scheduled quarterly sampling events.

O&M Operational Summary

The approved SAP required the sampling of eighteen (18) monitor wells at the Normandy ParkApartments Site. Thirteen (13) of these wells are screened within the upper portion of the surficialaquifer (MW-1 through MW-6, MW-7A, and MW-8 through MW-13), two (2) are screened at thebase of the surficial aquifer (MW-DSA-1 and MW-DSA-2), and three (3) are screened into theuppermost portion of the Floridan aquifer. The locations of the monitor wells are shown on Plate 4.

Sampling of the required wells began in August 2001, after installation of six new monitor wellsrequired under the SAP. Starting in October 2001, ground water samples were collected quarterly(January, April, July and October) from monitor wells MW-7A, MW-10, MW-11, MW-12,MW-DSA-1 and MW-DSA-2. These samples were analyzed for lead, arsenic, and antimony.Semi-annually (April and October), samples were also collected from existing surficial monitorwells MW-1, MW-2, and MW-8, and from the existing Floridan aquifer monitor well PZ-1, andanalyzed for the same parameters.


Changes to the ground water monitoring plan were proposed and subsequently approved by the EPAin a March 27, 2003 letter. The changes that were approved were:

1. Sampling of all of the monitoring program wells on a semi-annual basis, except for wellsMW-7A and MW-11. These two wells are sampled quarterly.

2. Analysis of the samples for arsenic concentrations only once per year, during the Octobersampling event.

3. Addition of sampling of monitor well MW-5 semi-annually. The sample from this well isanalyzed only for antimony.

In addition to these changes, the installation of a surficial aquifer monitor well was recommendedalong the western property boundary, approximately midway between wells MW-2 and MW-5 inthe report (dated October 23, 2003) that presented the results of the July and April 2003 samplingevents. This well (identified as well MW-13) was recommended to provide a point for themeasurement of ground water elevation that was needed to better define the direction of groundwater flow along the western property line and to identify and evaluate the extent of elevatedantimony concentrations in the ground water. A ground water flow map for the site is provided inAppendix A, Plate 2. The installation of this well was approved by the EPA and subsequentlyinstalled on June 17, 2004. Sampling of this well occurs semi-annually.

Reports of the ground water sampling results are submitted to the EPA after completion of each ofthe ground water sampling events. The most recent of the sampling events is described in the reportprepared by QORE entitled "April 2006 Sampling Event, Remedial Action Ground Water Sampling,Normandy Park Apartments, Tampa, Florida, For Gulf Coast Recycling, QORE Project No.2148M", dated June 26, 2006. A copy of this report is provided in Appendix A and the results of theground water monitoring are presented in Table 2 of the report.

O&M activities with respect to maintaining the tree plazas have been minimal. Mulch was addedto the large tree plaza in the central courtyard of the middle apartment complex in December 2005.Minor paving block repairs were made at the same time to a tree plaza on the north side and adjacentto the parking lot between the northern and central complexes. Since completion of the remedy, noother O&M activities have been recorded with respect to the tree plazas.

Costs of O&M Operations

Costs of the O&M operations to maintain the tree plazas have been minimal to-date. The groundwater sampling activities vary depending on the number of wells being sampled and the analysesbeing performed. In general, with GCR personnel assisting in the sampling, sampling costs typicallyrange from $1500 (January and July) to $3000 (March and September) per sampling event. Actualyearly invoiced costs associated with the ground water sampling, since October 2001, are as follows:


Table 2 - Annual O&M Costs

Year Invoiced Costs 2001 $1,870 2002 $9,600 2003 $8,425 2004 $9,590 2005 $8,280 Total $37,765

O&M Effectiveness

To date, the ground water monitoring has occurred as required and, as illustrated by the reductionsin the sampling requirements, has effectively tracked ground water quality at the site. Similarly, thetree plazas have required essentially no maintenance to date and they are, therefore, effective inmaintaining the remedy .

During a site inspection by GCR representatives in December 2005, it was discovered that a fewconcrete pavers making up one of the tree plazas had been disturbed. The pavers had been removedbut replaced within the area from which they were removed. An adjacent resident of the apartmentcomplex reported to GCR personnel that this activity had recently occurred and was done byteenagers that resided at the facility. GCR repaired the tree plaza and also renewed the mulch placedin the tree plaza located within the courtyard area of the middle apartment complex.

V. PROGRESS SINCE LAST 5-YEAR REVIEW

This review is the first 5-year review for the project.

VI. FIVE-YEAR REVIEW PROCESS

Administrative Components

GCR was notified of the initiation of the five-year review process in a telephone conversation anda follow-up email from Mr. William Denman of the EPA on July 15, 2005. The Normandy ParkApartments Site Five-Year Review was led by Mr. Denman of the EPA, Remedial Project Managerfor the Normandy Park Apartments Site, and included employees from QORE, Inc. (QORE), underthe direction of Mr. Lawrence J. Maron, P. E. QORE is the environmental consulting firm thatprepared the Streamlined Remedial Investigation and Focused Feasibility Study, and developed andover saw the remedial action.

Community Involvement

A notice was sent on December 15, 2005 to the Temple Terrace Beacon, a local newspaper focusedin the area of Temple Terrace, that announced that the EPA was conducting the Five-Year Reviewfor the Normandy site and inviting public comments. Mr. William Denman of the EPA wasidentified as the contact. This notice was published in the December 21, 2005 newspaper. Nocomments were received from any parties. A copy of the notice is provided in Appendix B.


Mr. Denman also visited the Temple Terrace Library, the designated repository for documentspertaining to the site, on December 13, 2005, to verify that the documents submitted to therepository in the past were available. The documents were readily available.

Document Review

This five-year review included a review of relevant documents including the ROD and the groundwater monitoring data. A listing of the documents reviewed is provided in Appendix C.

Data Review

Ground water monitoring has been conducted at the site since February 1996 on an irregular basisuntil October 2001. At that time, ground water monitoring began on a quarterly basis as part of theapproved ROD. A copy of the historical monitoring data collected at the site is provided in Table2 in Appendix A.

Since the start of quarterly monitoring in October 2001, lead has been detected at concentrationsabove the laboratory's Practical Quantitation Limit (PQL) of 0.0050 mg/l essentially only inmonitoring wells MW-1 and MW-7A with the most recent concentrations (October 2005 samplingevent) being .026 mg/l and .26 mg/l, respectively. Both these concentrations exceed the cleanupstandard of 0.015 mg/l established in the ROD.

Arsenic concentrations have remained below the laboratory's PQL of 0.010 mg/l in all of the wellssince October 2001.

Antimony concentrations exceed the cleanup standard of 0.006 mg/l in all of the monitor wellsexcept wells MW-12, MW-DSA-1, MW-DSA-2 and PZ-1. Well MW-5 has the highestconcentrations, ranging from 0.10 to 0.14 mg/l. The antimony concentrations in wells MW-1 andMW-7A have generally decreased over the long term; however, the concentrations in the remainingwells have generally fluctuated within narrow (0.010 mg/l) ranges.

Ground water elevations are all similar in pattern since implementation of the SAP. From Octoberto January a decrease in water level on the order of two feet is generally seen and then a smallerdecrease of less than ½ foot from January to April. This decrease is a reflection of Florida's "dry"season. Water levels then typically increase on the order of 1 to 1.5 feet from April to the samplingconducted in July reflecting the beginning of the typical "wet" season in Florida. Water levelstypically continue to increase, slightly, from the July to October sampling events, dependingprimarily on the amount of rainfall that is received.

The elevated concentrations of antimony have been attributed, at least in part, to a potential offsitesource. Monitoring well MW-5, in which the highest concentrations have been recorded, is locatedalong the western property boundary in the southwestern corner of the site. Monitoring wells MW-2and MW-13 are located along the western property boundary and both wells have elevatedconcentrations of antimony. Ground water elevations are highest at these latter two wells and theground water contour maps indicate that ground water flows beneath the site from the westernproperty boundary over the approximate middle of the site. Well MW-2 is also located up-gradient(west) of the area of the historical lead recycling activities. The concentrations of lead and arsenicin well MW-2 have been below the laboratory's PQL in all of the prior sampling events, indicating


a possible source other than battery recycling activities for the antimony concentrations observed.The lead concentration in well MW-13 was also below the laboratory's PQL (as noted in Section IV.REMEDIAL ACTIONS, Operation and Maintenance, the installation of well MW-13 wasrecommended by GCR to better evaluate the direction of ground water flow along the westernproperty boundary and the source of the antimony).

Site Inspection

A site inspection was conducted on December 13, 2005 by Mr. William Denman of the EPA, Mr.Lawrence Maron of QORE and Ms. Joyce Morales-Caramella of GCR. The purpose of theinspection was to assess the protectiveness of the remedy by walking most areas of the site andobserving the conditions of the tree plazas and the overall site.

No issues were identified during the inspection. All tree plazas appeared to be unaltered since theirconstruction (the tree plaza identified in "O& M Effectiveness” having been repaired by GCR priorto the site inspection). New mulch had been placed in the tree plaza within the courtyard of thecentral apartment complex and the asphalt was maintained within the pavement areas. No evidencewas observed that would indicate that digging within the grassed areas or within the paved areas hadoccurred since the remedy. A copy of the site inspection checklist is provided in Appendix D.

Restrictive covenants have been filed on the property deed which include prohibitions on the useof ground water at the site until clean up levels are achieved and notifications that the soils underthe structures, paved areas and sidewalks are contaminated and that, if any of these structures areremoved, then appropriate measures must be taken to address the underlying contaminated soils. Acopy of the restrictive covenants is included in Appendix F of this report. Notifications are alsorequired to notify future owners of the property of the site conditions and restrictions.

Interviews

Interviews were conducted with various parties connected to the site on December 13 and 14, 2005.The following people were interviewed:

Table 3 - List of Interviewees Name Position Affiliation

Diane Lee President DLG Management Systems(DLG)

Amy Flanagan Property Manager DLG, and resident

Diana Colon Leasing Agent DLG, and resident

Franky Acuna Maintenance Man DLG

Victor Claudio Maintenance Man DLG

Apartment Resident #1 Apartment Resident Resident

Apartment Resident #2 Apartment Resident Resident

Joyce Morales-Caramella Environmental and Health Manager GCR


DLG Management Systems is the entity managing the complex for the current owner.

All but Apartment Resident #2 were interviewed on December 13, 2006 by Messrs. Denman andMaron and Ms. Morales-Caramella. Apartment Resident #2 was interviewed by Mr. Denman onDecember 14, 2006. Both interviewees were residents of the apartment complex before the remedialaction was performed. Copies of the completed interview forms are provided in Appendix E.

The interviews with the DLG personnel revealed that most, including the site leasing andmaintenance personnel, were unaware that contaminated soils remained on site and that restrictionsexisted with respect to disturbance of soils under the site structures (including sidewalks and pavedareas). Ms. Lee and Flanagan reported that notices were provided to new tenants after the remedialaction was completed to make them aware of the contamination that remained on site; however, thispractice had been dropped over the past couple of years.

Ms. Morales-Caramella indicated that she had recently observed that several pavers that compriseone of the tree plazas had been pulled up, reportedly by teenagers that resided at the complex. Ms.Morales-Caramella made arrangements for GCR personnel to repair the plaza and alerted theapartment management personnel during the interview that the apartment personnel needed to bealert for these activities.

No issues were identified by the long-term residents of the site.

VII. TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT

Question A: Is the remedy functioning as intended by the decision documents?

The information reviewed and work performed during this review indicate that the remedy isfunctioning as intended by the ROD. The removal of the soil from all areas that would affordexposure of humans and animals has achieved the remedial objectives to minimize ingestion ofcontaminants in the soil. All of the structures under which contaminated soil remains are still intact.

The remedial action has been effective in preventing exposure to or use of contaminated groundwater at the site. During the past 5 years, the monitoring system has been optimized to delete thecollection of extraneous data and to add one monitor well to better define that off site sources maybe contributing to elevated antimony concentrations in the ground water under the western portionof the site.

The institutional controls (restrictive covenants) that are in place provide notification that the soilunderneath the structures, paved areas and sidewalks are contaminated. The restrictive covenantsalso require that if any of these structures are removed, then appropriate measures must be taken toaddress the underlying contaminated soils. With one minor exception near the end of the five-yearreview period (the recent disturbance of pavers at one tree plaza), the cap (existing structures andtree plazas) has been undisturbed. A copy of the restrictive covenants has been included in AppendixF.

After the interviews of the on-site personnel, EPA was notified by the apartment manager that thesoil under the first floor of one of the townhouses would be exposed and disturbed during the repairof plumbing under the floor. The apartment personnel had advised the plumbing contractor that the


soil was contaminated and required special care in removal and disposal. The plumbing work wasperformed on December 26, 2005 and was attended by representatives of QORE and GCR whoverified that proper protective clothing was worn by the plumbing contractors and that soil removedfrom the excavation was properly handled. Excess soil was drummed and taken to OCR's Tampafacility for processing.

Question B: Are the exposure assumption, toxicity data, cleanup target levels, and remedialaction objectives (RAQs) used at the time of the remedy selection still valid?

The Federal drinking water standard and the ground water standard (Maximum Contaminant Level(MCL)) for Class G-II Ground Water within the State of Florida for arsenic was lowered from 0.050mg/l to 0.010 mg/l (Rule 62-550, Florida Administrative Code). This change has had no effect onthe remedy selection because the concentration of arsenic at the site has been below the revisedMCL of 0.010 since the April 2002 sampling event.

The Soil Cleanup Target Level (SCTL) for lead, as established by the State of Florida in Rule62-777, Florida Administrative Code, is 400 mg/kg for the residential exposure scenario. Thisconcentration was initially established for certain State cleanup programs in May 1999 andre-affirmed in April 2005; however, the SCTL can be modified if a site-specific risk assessment isperformed. Even if one utilizes the SCTL of 400 mg/kg, it has no effect on the remedial actionperformed at the site because the only place soil was not excavated is within the drip-line of selecttrees. The concentrations of lead in the soil samples collected from the tree areas that tree plazaswere not constructed over, were all less than 400 mg/kg. Copies of the plates that transmitted thesoil sampling results within the tree preservation areas to the EPA are provided in Appendix G.

Overall, the remedy is progressing as expected. As previously discussed, all monitor wells have seenan overall decrease in the concentration of contaminants. The lead concentration in all the monitorwells except MW-1 and MW-7A are below the cleanup standard of 0.015 mg/l. Chart 1 is providedin appendix H showing the decreasing trend of lead concentration in MW-1 and MW-7A.

The arsenic concentration has remained below the laboratory's PQL of 0.010 mg/l in all of the wellssince October 2001. Overall, the antimony concentrations have fluctuated, however they do showa decreasing trend in concentration levels. Chart 2 is provided in appendix H showing the antimonyconcentrations in MW-7A and MW-11.

Piezometer PZ-1 has been sampled semi-annually for antimony, arsenic and lead to insure that theFloridan Aquifer remains uncontaminated. No detections of these parameters above the laboratory'sreporting limit have occurred since the start of sampling in February 1996. Based on this and othercontamination assessment work performed on site, the Floridan Aquifer remains unaffected by pastsite activities.

Question C: Has any other information come to light that could call into question theprotectiveness of the remedy?

No information was identified during this five-year review that questions the protectiveness of theremedy.


Technical Assessment Summary

According to the data reviewed, the site inspection, and the interviews, the remedy is functioningas intended by the ROD. There have been no changes in the physical conditions of the site thatwould affect the protectiveness of the remedy. Most ARARs for soil contamination cited in the RODhave been met. There have been no changes in toxicity factors for the contaminants of concern thatwere used in the baseline risk assessment, and there have been no change to the standardizedassessment methodology that could affect the protectiveness of the remedy. There is no otherinformation that calls into question the protectiveness of the remedy.

VIII. ISSUES

Table 4 - Issues Issue Currently Affects

Protectiveness Affects FutureProtectiveness

Maintenance and management personnel unaware of need tomaintain tree plaza areas

No Yes

Maintenance and management personnel unaware ofpresence of contaminated soil on site

No Yes

New tenants not informed of past remedial actions andpresence of contaminated soil on site

No No

Decrease of antimony concentrations in groundwater atcertain locations not occurring as quickly as expected.

No No

Resolve need for monitor well along eastern propertyboundary as requested by the FDEP.

No No


IX. RECOMMENDATIONS AND FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS

Table 5 - Recommendations and Follow-Up Actions

Issue Recommendations/Follow-Up Actions

PartyResponsible

OversightAgency

MilestoneDate

AffectsProtectiveness

(Y/N)

Current Future

Tree plazamaintenance

Prepare writtendescription of inspectionand maintenanceactivities for sitepersonnel.

GCR EPA 1/1/2007 N Y

Writtencontaminatedsoil plan

Prepare writtendescription of actions tobe taken whencontaminated soilexposed. Meet withmaintenance andmanagement personnelyearly to review soilcontaminationrestrictions. Quarterlyverify with managementstaff that newmaintenance personnelhave been educated onsoil contaminationrestrictions.

GCR EPA 1/1/2007 N Y

Notification ofnew tenants

Prepare one-pageinformation sheet to handout to new tenants

DLG/GCR EPA 1/1/2007 N N

Decrease ofantimonyconcentration

Evaluate the potential foran offsite source ofantimony concentration

QORE EPA 10/1/2007 N N

Disseminating ofground watercontamination touncontaminatedareas.

Prior to conducting thenext 5-year reviewmonitoring wells MW-6and MW-9 will besampled.

QORE EPA 6/1/2011 N N

Resolve need formonitor wellwith FDEP.

Discuss need for monitorwell with EPA and FDEP.

EPA EPA 10/1/2007 N N


X. PROTECTIVENESS STATEMENT

The remedy is expected to be protective of human health and the environment upon attainment ofground water cleanup goals through natural attenuation. In the interim, institutional controls arepreventing the exposure to and ingestion of contaminated ground water at the site. Similarly,institutional controls are preventing exposure to and ingestion of contaminated soil at the site. Allthreats at the site have been addressed through removal of contaminated soil in readily accessibleareas, the construction of tree plazas in areas where the soil was not removed from existing tree rootsystems, and institutional controls to notify current and future owners of the site that soil under theexisting structures (including paved areas and sidewalks) is contaminated and must be addressedappropriately if any structure is demolished or soil is excavated from beneath the structures.

XI. NEXT REVIEW

The next five-year review for the Normandy Park Apartment site is required within five years of thesignature/approval date of this report. It should be noted that wells MW-6 and MW-9 must besampled prior to the next five-year review.

APPENDIX A

APRIL 2006 SAMPLING REPORT


Prepared for:

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency61 Forsyth Street

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960

Prepared by:

QORE, Inc.1211 Tech Blvd.

Suite 200Tampa, Florida 33619

April 2006 Sampling EventRemedial Action Ground Water Sampling

Normandy Park ApartmentsTampa, Florida

For EnviroFocus Technologies, L.L.C.

June 26, 2006QORE Project No. 2148M

1 2 1 1 Tech Blvd. Suite 200 Tampa, Florida 33619 (813) 623-6646 fax (813) 623-3795

June 26, 2006

Mr. William C. Denman, P. E. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 61 Forsyth Street Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960

Re: April 2006 Sampling Event Remedial Action Ground Water Sampling Normandy Park Apartments Tampa, Florida For EnviroFocus Technologies, L. L. C. QORE Project No. 2148M

Dear Mr. Denman,

QORE, Inc. (QORE) is pleased to submit this report presenting the results of the periodic groundwater sampling conducted as part of the Remedial Action at the above-referenced site. The groundwater sampling was initially described in QORE's document entitled "Revised Sampling andAnalysis Plan, Remedial Design Ground Water Sampling, Normandy Park Apartments, Tampa,Florida, for Gulf Coast Recycling", dated February 13, 2001, and was modified by the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in a letter from Mr. Bill Denman to Ms. Joyce Morales-Caramella of Gulf Coast Recycling, Inc. (GCR) dated March 27, 2003. Please be advised thatEnviroFocus Technologies, L. L. C. (EFT) purchased substantially all of the assets of GCR on May31, 2006 and will be responsible for continuing the ground water monitoring at the site. QORE willcontinue to perform the ground water monitoring on behalf of EFT.

This report presents the results of the sampling conducted in April 2006.

BACKGROUND

The approved Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) required the installation of six monitor wells atthe Normandy Park Apartment site after the remedial action was completed: four screened withinthe upper portion of the surficial aquifer (MW-7A, MW-10, MW-11 and MW-12) and two screenedat the base of the surficial aquifer (MW-DSA-1 and MW-DSA-2). The installation of these monitorwells was completed on August 30, 2001.

The six monitor wells required by the SAP supplemented eight (8) surficial aquifer monitor wells(MW-1 through MW-6, MW-8 and MW-9) that existed at the site. Three monitor wells (MWFL-1,PZ-1 and PZ-2) also exist on site that are screened into the uppermost portion of the Floridanaquifer. The locations of all the monitor wells are shown on Plate 1.

1211 Tech Blvd. Suite 200 Tampa, Florida 33619 (813) 623-6646 fax (813) 623-3795

Normandy Park Apartments June 26, 2006QORE Job No. 27-2148M Page 2

Starting in October 2001, ground water samples were collected quarterly (January, April, July andOctober) from the six monitor wells installed in accordance with the SAP. These samples wereanalyzed for lead, arsenic, and antimony. Semi-annually (April and October), samples were alsocollected from existing surficial monitor wells MW-1, MW-2, and MW-8, and from the existingFloridan aquifer monitor well PZ-1, and analyzed for the same parameters.

Changes to the ground water monitoring plan were approved in EPA's March 27, 2003 letter to Ms.Joyce Morales-Caramella of OCR. The changes that were approved were:

1. All of the monitor wells in the ground water monitoring program are sampled semi-annually,except for wells MW-7A and MW-11. These two wells are sampled quarterly.

2. Arsenic concentrations are measured only once per year, during the October sampling event.

3. Semi-annual sampling of monitor well MW-5 was added to the monitoring program. Thesample from this well is analyzed only for antimony.

In addition to these changes, the installation of a surficial aquifer monitor well (MW-13) wasrecommended along the western property boundary, approximately midway between wells MW-2and MW-5 in the report (dated October 23, 2003) that presented the results of the July and April2003 sampling events. This well was recommended to provide a point for the measurement ofground water elevation, needed to better define the direction of ground water flow along the westernproperty line, and to identify and evaluate the extent of elevated antimony concentrations in theground water. The installation of this well was approved by the EPA and it was subsequentlyinstalled on June 17, 2004. Sampling of this well occurs semi-annually along with the other shallowaquifer wells.

GROUND WATER FLOW

The depth to ground water was measured in all the wells on April 20, 2006. The ground water depthsand the corresponding ground water elevations are presented in Table 1. Due to much lower thannormal rainfall during the months preceding the April 20th measurements, the water level in twomonitor wells (MW-3 and MW-4) had dropped below the bottom of their respective well screens.

The ground water elevations were plotted on a scaled map of the site and equal lines of ground waterelevation were interpolated between the known points. The individual water elevations at each welland the ground. water contours for the surficial aquifer during the April event are shown on Plate2. At the time of the ground water measurements, ground water flow at the site appears to be radiallytoward the north, east and south from a ground water "high" located west of the western propertyboundary. This flow pattern is similar to that reported during prior sampling events.

The potentiometric elevations measured in the Floridan monitor wells during the April samplingevent are shown on Plate 3. Ground water flow in the Floridan aquifer during this event was towardthe east-northeast. This flow direction is more northerly than the southeasterly-trending flowsidentified during the January 2006 sampling event; however flow in a northeasterly direction tendsto be more consistent with previous events. In general, the slope of the potentiometric surface is veryshallow at the site (less than 3 inches over 500 feet). As a result, small changes in measurements atthe wells can dramatically affect the purported direction of ground water flow.


GROUND WATER MONITORING

Ground water samples were collected on April 20 and 21, 2006, from monitor wells MW-1, MW-2,MW-5, MW-7A, MW-8, MW-10, MW-11, MW-12, MW-13, MW-DSA-1, MW-DSA-2 and PZ-1,as designated in the SAP. All sampling was conducted in accordance with the procedures andprotocols contained in the QORE Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) most recently approvedby the EPA. After purging the well, each ground water sample was analyzed in the field fortemperature, pH, conductivity, turbidity and dissolved oxygen. The ground water samples wereplaced in laboratory-supplied sample containers and stored on ice in a laboratory-supplied cooleruntil delivery to the laboratory for analysis. The samples were submitted to STL Tampa West (STL)for analysis of total antimony and total lead using EPA Method 6010.

The results of the laboratory analyses are summarized in Table 2. With the exception of the samplesfrom wells MW-1 and MW-2, the turbidities of the samples from all the wells were less than 10Nephelometric turbidity units (NTUs). The turbidity values in wells MW-1 and MW-2 could not belowered below 23 NTUs and 35 NTUs, respectively, during the sampling. As a result, filteredsamples were also collected from these two wells for analysis. Despite filtering, the turbidities ofthe filtered samples were 15 NTUs for MW-1 and 13 NTUs for MW-2. This is the third consecutivesampling event that a filtered sample has been collected from well MW-1 and the first for wellMW-2.

Table 2 also includes the results of prior water quality sampling conducted under the SAP andsampling results reported in the Streamlined Remedial Investigation, prepared by QORE, Inc., datedJune 30, 1999. Copies of the laboratory reports and field sampling forms for the April 2006 samplingevent are presented in Appendix A.

The results of the water quality sampling are very similar to past sampling events. Lead was reportedat a concentration above the laboratory's Practical Quantitation Limit (PQL) of 0.0050 milligramsper liter (mg/l) only in the samples collected from wells MW-1, MW-2 and MW-7A. The unfilteredlead concentration in the sample from well MW-1 was 0.027 mg/l, which is virtually the same asthat reported for the October 2005 sampling event (0.026 mg/l). The unfiltered lead concentrationin the sample from well MW-2 was 0.012 mg/l, which represents the only value reported for thiswell above the PQL of 0.0050 mg/l. The concentration of lead in the filtered sample from wellMW-2 was < 0.0050 mg/l, indicating that the unfiltered lead concentration is likely caused bysediment in the sample. The lead concentration in the filtered sample from well MW-1 was 0.015mg/l, which indicates that at least some of the reported lead concentration can likely be attributedto sediment in the sample. The lead concentration in the sample from well MW-7A was 0.24 mg/l,virtually the same concentration of 0.23 mg/l reported during the October 2005 sampling event andwell within the range of concentrations reported in the past. The concentrations of lead in wellsMW-1 and MW-7A are greater than the Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) of 0.015 mg/l, asestablished by the Primary Drinking Water Standards and Rule 62-520, Florida AdministrativeCode.

During the April 2006 sampling event, antimony was reported above the laboratory's PQL in theground water samples collected from wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-5, MW-7A, MW-8, MW-10,MW-11 and MW-13. The antimony concentrations for these samples were all greater than the MCL


of 0.006 mg/l, with the maximum concentration occurring in well MW-10. In general, theconcentrations of antimony in the wells were similar to concentrations that had been previouslyreported, with the exception of wells MW-7A and MW-10. The concentration of antimony in wellMW-10 was almost four times the value reported in the last sampling event for this well (October2005) while the concentration in well MW-7A was almost one-half the previous value (January2006).

ANALYSIS OF ANTIMONY CONCENTRATIONS

In the past, the reports presenting the results of the semi-annual sampling events provided adiscussion of the elevated antimony concentrations in relationship to any historic changes in groundwater flow directions and/or water level fluctuations. The plots of antimony concentration versuswater level previously presented were updated with the April 2006 sampling event data for wellsMW-1, MW-2, MW-5, MW-7A, MW-8, MW-10, MW-11, MW-12 and MW-13 and are providedin Appendix B. Plots for the remaining wells in the monitoring program have not been developedbecause antimony concentrations have always been reported to be below the laboratory's PQL of0.0060 mg/l.

The plots of the water elevations are all similar in pattern over the past year, as follows:

• Water levels increased slightly (on the order of 1 to 1.5 feet) from April 2005 to thesampling conducted in July 2005, reflecting the beginning of the seasonal increase in rainfallassociated with the typical "wet" season in Florida.

• Water levels decreased slightly (less than ½ feet) from the July 2005 to the October 2005sampling events, suggesting a decreased amount of rainfall for this period.

• Since the October 2005 sampling event, water levels decreased on the order of 1-½ feet atthe time of the January 2006 sampling event and continued to decrease 1-¼ feet at the timeof the April 2006 event. As noted previously, wells MW-3 and MW-4 were dry during theApril 2006 event. The decreases in the water table reflect the smaller amounts of rainfallassociated with Florida's "dry" season.

A review of the antimony versus water level plots indicates three general trends, as follows:

1. Antimony concentrations decrease as water levels increase and increase as water levelsdecrease. The antimony concentrations in wells MW-1 and MW-10 appear to follow thistrend, especially over the last 2 years. Antimony concentrations in well MW-2 also followedthis trend with the exception of the October 2005 sampling event, when the antimonyconcentration dropped below the PQL of 0.006 mg/l with a drop in water level. Antimonyconcentrations in MW-13 appeared to follow this trend; however, during this samplingevent, the antimony concentration decreased as the water level decreased. The decrease inantimony concentrations as water levels increase can be associated with dilution due to theincreased volume of water resulting from the percolation of rainwater. As water levelsdecrease, the volume of water decreases and the antimony concentration increases.


2. Antimony concentrations parallel the pattern of water levels, that is, concentrations increaseas water levels increase and decrease as water levels decrease. This pattern generally occursin well MW-7A. This type of pattern typically indicates that antimony is being dissolved aswater level increases; however, the plot of antimony concentrations clearly shows thatantimony concentrations are decreasing over the long term. Concentrations currently areabout 1/5 the value observed during sampling events in 2002.

3. Antimony concentrations don't change in response to water levels. This trend occurs in wellsMW-5, MW-8, and MW-11. Antimony concentrations in well MW-5 show a consistentdecrease since monitoring of this well began, although, with the single exception of a slightincrease for the October 2005 sampling event. Antimony concentrations in wells MW-8 andMW-11 are remaining relatively constant.

As noted previously, the antimony concentration in well MW-2 dropped below the MCL of 0.006mg/l for the first time during the October 2005 sampling event. The antimony concentration onlyincreased slightly to 0.0012 mg/l (filtered) this sampling event. The water level and antimonyconcentrations reported during the April 2006 event still support the contention that the area westof the site may be contributing to at least some of the elevated antimony concentrations, as follows:

• Ground water elevations are highest at wells MW-2 and MW-13 and ground water flow hasbeen toward the east and south from these wells.

• The ground water contour maps indicate that ground water flows beneath the site from thewestern property boundary over the approximate middle of the site. Well MW-2 is alsolocated up-gradient (west) of the area of historical lead recycling activities, indicating thatwater flowing beneath the site from the west may be contributing to at least some of theelevated antimony concentrations.

• The concentrations of lead and arsenic in well MW-2 have been below the laboratory's PQLin all of the prior sampling events, indicating a possible source other than battery recyclingactivities for the antimony concentrations observed in well MW-2. The lead concentrationin well MW-13 was also below the laboratory's PQL.

Well MW-5, which has normally had the highest concentrations of antimony, is also located alongthe western property boundary in the southwestern corner of the site. Ground water flow at thislocation is typically toward the south or southeast, further indicating a possible source west of thesite.

QORE is pleased to have this opportunity to submit this information for EFT. If you have anyquestions pertaining to this report, please do not hesitate to contact us.

* * * * *


Yours very truly, QORE, Inc.

Four (4) copies submitted

cc: Ms. Joyce Morales-Caramella - EFT (two copies)

TABLE 1GROUND WATER ELEVATIONS

APRIL 20, 2006NORMANDY PARK APARTMENTS

Measuring PointDesignation

Top-of-CasingElevation (feet

NGVD)

Depth to Water(feet btoc)

Water LevelElevation (feet

NGVD)

Shallow Aquifer Monitor Wells

MW-1

MW-2

MW-3

MW-4

MW-5

MW-6

MW-7A

MW-8

MW-9

MW-10

MW-11

MW-1 2

MW-1 3

76.14

78.03

78.57

78.42

74.19

76.54

77.35

78.01

77.77

76.39

76.06

77.86

77.34

8.37

8.04

DRY

DRY

6.95

10.01

9.02

9.04

9.22

9.57

10.20

11.81

6.88

67.77

69.99

DRY

DRY

67.24

66.53

68.33

68.97

68.55

66.82

65.86

66.05

70.46

Deep Shallow Aquifer Monitor Wells

MW-DSA-1

MW-DSA-2

76.44

75.78

9.72

10.20

66.72

65.58

Floridan Aquifer Monitor Wells

MWFL-1

PZ-1

PZ-2

78.81

74.09

76.31

59.70

54.86

57.28

19.11

19.23

19.03

Note: Feet NGVD = feet above National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929.

N.M. = Not Measured

btoc; = below top of casing

TABLE 2SUMMARY OF GROUND WATER QUALITY

NORMANDY PARK APARTMENTS

WELL NO.

MW-1

MW-2

MW5

MW-7A

MW-8

DATE

BlfSielKiSJ,20-Feb-9617-Dec-9810-Aug-0125-Oct-0114-Jan-0216-Apr-0231-JUW230-001-02^17-Apr-0315-Ocf-0313-Apr-044-Oct-0413-Apr-0520-Oct-0520-Apr-0620-Fet>-9617-060-9810-Aug-Q121-Nov-OI14-Jan-021S-Apr-0231-JuW>230-Oct-0218-Apr-03IS-Oct-0313-Apr-045-Oct-0413-Apr-0520-Ocl-0521-Apr-0616-D80-9817-Apr-0316-Oct-0313-Apr-044-Oct-0413-Apr-0519-Oct-0520-Apr-0820-Feb-9B17-D60-9813-Aug-0126-Oct-0115-Jatv0217-Apr-0231-JuW>231-0ct-0218-Apr-0318-JUH3316-Oct-0312-Jan-0413-Apr-0413-Jul-045-Oct-04

20-Jan-OS13-Apr-057-Jul-05

20-Oct-0512-Jan-OS21-Apr-0620-Feb-9816-Dec-9810-Aug-0126-Oct-0114-Jan-0217-Apr-0231-Jul-0231-0ct-0226-Apr-031S-Oct-0313-ApMH5-Oct-0413-Apr-0520-Oct-0521-Apr-06

ANTIMONY,mg/l

S&biobeaii

0.042ns

0.054ns

0.085ns

0.0570.0380.0410.0480.012

0.026 (0.025)0.033 (0.035)0.037 (0.037)

0.04ns

0.025 (0.026)ns

0.034ns

0.0170.00970.0210.0590.0210.034

<0.00600.0097 (0.012)

0.0930.140.130.120.120.100.120.09

0.11 (0.099)"0.0810.290.160.150.140.150.0930.110.13

0.0740.0370.0590.0860.0490.0570.0720.0520.0550.03

0.013ns

0.018ns

0.033 (0.032)ns

0.0340.0270.0260.0270.0300.0230.024O.OZ1

ARSENIC,mg/l

WlfOfOSl?^

•cO.010<0.010

nsO.010

ns<0.010

nsO.010

na<0.010

na<0.010

naO.010

na<0.010O.010

nsO.010

ns<0.010

ns<0.010

na<0.010

na<0.010

naO.010

na<0.010

nanananananana

0.049"<0.010<0.0100.010

O.010<0.010<0.010

nana

<0.010nanana

<0.010nanana

<0.010nana

<0.010ns

O.010ns

0.015(0.011)ns

O.010na

<0.010na

<0.010na

<0.010na

LEAD,mg/l

wsWiofbli's'SSfl'0.013

0.15(0.10)ns

0.015ns

0.013ns

0.0160.0260.0130.0120.025

0.065 (0.052)0.026 (0.0092)0.027(0.015)

<0.0050<O.OQ50

ns<0.0050

ns<0.0050

ns<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050

0.012 (<0.0050)<0.0050

nanananananana

0.24(0.16)"0.0840.450.370.660.300.510.220.390.240.290.180.300.300.220.210.300.260.230.24

<0.0050ns

<0.0050ns

0.0070 (0.0050)ns

<0.0050<0.0050O.0050<0.00500.0057<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050

PH

6.42ns

4.45ns

6.17ns

5.966.956.066.756.176.185.806.07

6.40ns

6.27ns

6.33ns

6.086.756.286.605.665.454.975.746.896.926.226.726.706.165.895.86

6.64"6.375.566.126.296.206.186.906.826.476.927.516.616.657.206.416.736.187.006.42

6.18ns

5.90ns

6.24ns

6.366.896.016.306.315.885.595.88

TEMPERATURE

°C

26.7ns

28.4ns

26.3ns

30.026.529.525.831.626.231.127.3

26.0ns

25.7ns

26.4ns

29.125.529.225.129.325.230.326.924.524.027.223.228.022.828.524.3

23.3"27.223.621.824.126.526.422.225.926.622.721.526.026.824.821,926.828.524.523.9

24.8ns

24.7ns

26.2ns

27.524.327.324.027.724.229.12b.O

CONDUCTIVITYuS

98ns

243ns

451ns550210323172375197322193

310ns

568ns

489ns

3340333359561381221

149.785.5368294327567244249291275

404"421914791820810630543568424698496507483457503505439407494

445ns198ns155ns

293323226127211

115.6119.3203

TURBIDITY,NTUs

126.0ns5.6ns2.1ns4.710.06.17.09.5

55 (40). 16 (2.5)23 (15)

15.3ns6.8ns2.9ns5.14.66.40.60.58.77.4

35(13)0.43.81.60.69.45.5

0.511.4

54.8"2.30.30.32.24.61.72.62.01.34.62.28.66.81.45

5.10.050.50.4

4.5ns4.9ns

45 (21)ns3.63.37.48.59.97.95.81.7

Paga 1 of 3



WELL NO.

MW-10

MWM1

MW-12

MW-13

MW-DSA-1

DATE

20-Feb-9616-Dec-9810-Aug-0125-Oct-0114-Jan-0217-Apr-0231-JuW230-Oct-0218-Apr-0316-Oct-0313-Apr-044-Oct-0413-Apr-0520-0ct-0520-Apr-0620-Feb-9616-Dec-9B10-Aug-0125-Oct-0115-Jan-0217-Apr-0231-Jul-0231-0ct-0218-Apr-0318-Jul-0315-Oct-0312-Jan-0413-Apr-0413-JuWM4-Oct-04

20-Jan-0513-Apr-057-Jul-OS

19-Oct-0512-Jan-0620-Apr-0620-Feb-9616-Deo-9810-Aug-0125-Oct-0114-Jan-0216-Agr-0229-JuW>230-Oct-0217-Apr-0316-0ct-0313-Apr-044-Oct-04

14-DBC-0413-Apr-OS20-0ct-0521-Apr-0613-Jul-045-Oct-0413-Apr-0520-0ct-0521-Apr-0620-Feb-9616-D60-9810-Aug-0125-Oct-0114-Jan-0217-Apr-0231-Jul-0230-Oct-0218-APJ--0316-Oct-0313-Apr-045-Oct-0413-Agr-0520-Oct-0520-Apr-06

ANTIMONY,mg/l

MSM&^MAnini

0.0210.0200.0280.0300.0280.0310.0200.0280.0600.0330.0130.0270.12

nini

0.0360.0400.0280.010

(0.042)0.0520.0330.0380.0460.0350.0330.0340.0310.0290.0310.0380.0370.0380.031

nini

<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060O.00600.014

<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060<0.00600.0420.0620.0230.0460.032

nini

O.0060<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060

ARSENIC,mg/l

l SfbfdsrUsinini

<0.010<0.010<0.010<0.010<0.010<0.010

na<0.010

na<0.010

na<0.010

naninl

<0.010<0.010<0.010<0.010

(<0.010)<0.010

nana

<0.010nanana

<0.010nanana

<0.010nananini

<0.010<0.010<0.010<0.010<0.010<0.010

na<0.010

na<0.010

nana

<0.010nana

<0.010na

<0.010nanini

<0.010<0.010<0.010<0.010<0.010<0.010

na<0.010

naO.010

na<0.010

na

LEAD,mg/l

•S isol isls^

nini

<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050•=0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050

nini

<0.0050<0.00500.00880.022

(0.0068)<0.0050<0.00500.0060<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.00500.0074

<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050

nini

<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050

na<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050

ninl

<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050O.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050O.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<o.oo5o

PH

nini

5.845.435.945.765.705.746.636.356.686.456.155.936.52

nini

6.646.286.475.895.845.916.816.866.536.756.706.416.487.216.245.956.256.666.29nini

6.095.915.726.046.006.356.886.136.206.236.386.356.205.496.205.226.1

5.996.0nini

4.063.773.713.623.472.803.493.813.773.673.063.563.75

TEMPERATURE

°C

nini

24.228.424.428.229.430.526.730.126.231.126.131.128.4

nlni

23.226.321.025.927.827.223.927.527.322.723.327.127.324.023.827.828.123.125.3

nlnl

22.625.922.025.126.927.024.226.323.627.425.123.227.825.229.530.326.231.227.5nini

23.927.324.826.527.328.526.927.926.029.125.529.627.8

CONDUCTIVITYuS

nini

442444463494586355274351343

190.2348320261nlni

49245843.3226325257370293321441300270

105.8429377272313335236nlni

319336350285536460553492373319642463350489535390409389308nini

4544274684455005186255427266145BO474434

TURBIDITY,NTUs

nini

1.41.60.53.31.54.77.42.47.83.58.22.83.5nlni

0.50.80.73.1

14 (4.4)32(23)

3.89.37.45.27.48.8312.8

8.404.14.33.31.6ninl

0.30.00.01.00.01.60.60.83.40.63.05.20.00.07.80.14.70.05.4nlnl

2.30.30.21.10.13.40.91.44.74.54.50.130.15

Page 2 of 3



WELL NO.

MW-DSA-2

PZ-1

DATE

20-Feb-9616-Dec-9810-Aug-0125-Oct-0115-Jan-0217-Apr-0229-Jul-0230-Oct-0218-Apr-0315-OCMI313-Apr-044-Oct-0413-Apr-0519-Oct-0520-Apr-0620-Fet>-9615-DBC-9810-Aug-018-Nov-OI14-Jan-0217-Apr-0231-Jul-0231-Oct-0217-Apr-0315-Oct-0314-Apr-044-Oct-0413-Apr-0519-Oct-0520-Apr-06

ANTIMONY,mg/l

nini

<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060

<0.0060ns

<0.0060ns

<0.0060ns

<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060<0.0060

ARSENIC,mg/l

KMiO igSi;

nini

<0.010<0.010<0.010<0.010O.010<0.010

na<0.010

na<0.010

na<0.010

na<0.010<0.010

ns<0.010

ns<0.010

ns<0.010

na<0.010

na<0.010

na<0.010

na

LEAD,mg/l

a^sstf®nini

<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050O.OOSO<O.OOSO<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.00500.035*

ns<0.0050

ns<0.0050

ns<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050

PH

nlni

4.56

5.25

4.54

4.02

3.72

3.51

4.20

5.09

4.18

4.73

3.73

3.82

3.99

7.82

ns6.96ns

7.46ns

6.767.876.707.667.266.806.787.38

TEMPERATURE

°C

nlni

21.826.122.824.928.028.524.926.023.926.526.526.725.4

25.4ns

20.1ns

24.7ns

25.826.725.525.826.226.827.223.9

CONDUCTIVITYuS

nini

85.3183144145160215169215202

150.2273215275

320ns

118.9ns

220ns

292274291242222236224183

TURBIDITY.NTUs

nini

0.50.30.02.90.13.00.70.93.68.45.10.0

0.35

15.3ns2.2ns

10.0ns3.35.29.47.98.97.28.07.9

ns = -not sampled - samples are collected seml-annuallyni = :not installedna = • not analyzed - arsenic is now analyzed oncu per year in October* = concentration of sample collected on March 23,1999 was <0.0050** = sample collected from monitor well MW-7

mg/l = milligrams per literuS = microSiemens per centimeterNTU = Nephebmetric turbidity unit°C = degrees CentigradeMCL = Maximum Contaminant Limit, Rule 62-550, FAC

Concentrations in parentheses ( ) are dissolved concentrations for samples having high turbidity

Page 3 of 3

APPENDIX A

LABORATORY REPORTS & FIELD SAMPLING LOGS

iS!EV,ERN. STLANALYTICAL REPORT

Job Number: 660-8642-1

Job Description: Normandy Park

For:QORE Property Science

1211 Tech BoulvardSuite 200

Tampa, FL 33619

Attention: Mr. Larry Maron

Peggy PennerProject Manager II

[email protected]

04/28/2006

Project Manager: Peggy Penner

DOH Certification #: E84282, E87052

These test results meet all the requirements of NELAC. All questions regarding this test report should be directed to the STL ProjectManager who signed this test report. The estimated uncertainty associated with these reported results is available upon request.

Severn Trent Laboratories, Inc.STL Tampa 6712 Benjamin Road Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33634Tel (813)885-7427 Fax (813)885-7049 www.stl-inc.com

Page 1 of 27

METHOD SUMMARY

Client: QORE Property Science Job Number: 660-8642-1

Description Lab Location Method Preparation Method

Matrix: Water ""

Inductively Coupled Plasma - Atomic Emission Spectrometry STL-TAM SW846 6010BAcid Digestion of Waters for Total Recoverable or STL-TAM SW846 3005ASample Filtration performed in the Field STL-TAM FIELD_FLTRD

LAB REFERENCES:

STL-TAM = STL-Tampa

METHOD REFERENCES:

SW846 - 'Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986And Its Updates.

STL Tampa

Page 2 of 27

SAMPLE SUMMARY


Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Client MatrixDate/TimeSampled

Date/TimeReceived

660-8642-1660-8642-2660-8642-3660-8642-4660-8642-5660-8642-6660-8642-7660-8642-8660-8642-9660-8642-10660-8642-11660-8642-12660-8642-13660-8642-14

PZ-1 042006MW-11 042006MW-DSA-2 042006MW-10 042006MW-DSA-1 042006Dupe-1 042006MW-8 042106MW-13 042106MW-12 042106MW-1 042106MW-2 042106MW-5 042006MW-7A 042106EB-1

WaterWaterWaterWaterWaterWaterWaterWaterWaterWaterWaterWaterWaterWater

04/20/2006 101704/20/2006 115604/20/2006 125404/20/2006 141704/20/2006 145804/20/2006 000004/21/2006 081204/21/2006 091004/21/2006 102104/20/2006 115904/21/2006 103504/20/2006 102604/21/2006 084504/21/2006 0930

04/24/2006 081504/24/2006 081504/24/2006 081504/24/2006 081504/24/2006 081504/24/2006 081504/24/2006 081504/24/2006 081504/24/2006 081504/24/2006 081504/24/2006 081504/24/2006 081504/24/2006 081504/24/2006 0815

STL Tampa

Page 3 of 27

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - Detections


Lab Sample IDAnalyte

Client Sample IDResult / Qualifier

ReportingLimit Units Method

660-8642-2 MW-11 042006

Total RecoverableLeadAntimony

0.0017 I0.031

0.00500.0060

mg/Lmg/L

601 OB601 OB

660-8642-4 MW-10 042006

Total RecoverableAntimony 0.12 0.0060 mg/L 6010B

660-8642-7 MW-8 042106


660-8642-8 MW-13 042106


660-8642-10

DissolvedLead, DissolvedAntimony, Dissolved


MW-1 042106

0.0150.037

0.0270.037

0.00500.0060

0.00500.0060

mg/Lmg/L

mg/Lmg/L

6010B601 OB

601 OB601 OB

660-8642-11

DissolvedLead, DissolvedAntimony, Dissolved


MW-2 042106

0.0023 I0.012

0.0120.0097

0.00500.0060

0.00500.0060

mg/Lmg/L

mg/Lmg/L

6010B6010B

6010B6010B

STL Tampa

Page 4 of 27

EiXECUTIVE SUMMARY - Detections


Lab Sample ID Client Sample IDAnalyte Result / Qualifier

ReportingLimit Units Method

660-8642-12 MW-5 042006

Total Recoverable

Antimony 0.090 0.0060 mg/L 601 OB

660-8642-13 MW-7A 042106

Total Recoverable

LeadAntimony

0.240.030

0.00500.0060

mg/Lmg/L

6010B601 OB

STL Tampa

Page 5 of 27

SAMPLE RESULTS

STL Tampa

Page 6 of 27

Analytical Data


Client Sample ID: MW-11 042006

Lab Sample ID: 660-8642-2 Date Sampled: 04/20/2006 1156Client Matrix: Water Date Received: 04/24/20060815

601 OB Inductively Coupled Plasma -Atomic Emission Spectrometry-Total Recoverable

Method: 601 OB Analysis Batch: 660-24490 Instrument ID: TJAICPPreparation: 3005A Prep Batch: 660-24347 Lab File ID: 6D28BDilution: 1.0 Initial Weight/Volume: 50 mLDate Analyzed: 04/28/2006 1232 Final Weight/Volume: 50 mLDate Prepared: 04/26/2006 1312

Analyte Result (mg/L) Qualifier MDL PQL

Lead 0.0017 I 0.0016 0.0050Antimony 0.031 0.0036 0.0060

Page 8 of 27STL Tampa a

Analytical Data


Client Sample ID: PZ-1 042006

Lab Sample ID: 660-8642-1 Date Sampled: 04/20/20061017Client Matrix: Water Date Received: 04/24/20060815




Lead 0.0016 U 0.0016 0.0050Antimony 0.0036 U 0.0036 0.0060

__, _ Page 7 of 27STL Tampa °

Analytical Data


Client Sample ID: MW-DSA-2 042006

Lab Sample ID: 660-8642-3 Date Sampled: 04/20/2006 1254Client Matrix: Water Date Received: 04/24/2006 0815

6010B Inductively Coupled Plasma -Atomic Emission Spectrometry-Total Recoverable

Method: 601 OB Analysis Batch: 660-24490 Instrument ID: TJAICPPreparation: 3005A Prep Batch: 660-24347 Lab File ID: 6D28BDilution: 1.0 Initial Weight/Volume: 50 mLDate Analyzed: 04/28/2006 1237 Final Weight/Volume: 50 mLDate Prepared: 04/26/20061312


Lead 0.0016 U 0.0016 0.0050Antimony 0.0036 U 0.0036 0.0060

Page 9 of 27STL Tampa 3

Analytical Data




6010B Inductively Coupled Plasma -Atomic Emission Spectrometry-Total Recoverable ••• • ••••>• *r •-' Pinsr"-

Method: 601 OB Analysis Batch: 660-24490 Instrument ID: TJAICPPreparation: 3005A Prep Batch: 660-24347 Lab File ID: 6D28BDilution: 1.0 Initial Weight/Volume: 50 mLDate Analyzed: 04/28/20061242 Final WeightA/olume: 50 mLDate Prepared: 04/26/20061312


Lead 0.0016 U 0.0016 0.0050Antimony 0.12 0.0036 0.0060

CT1 T Page 10 of 27STL Tampa a

Analytical Data


Client Sample ID: NIW-DSA-1 042006

Lab Sample ID: 660-8642-5 Date Sampled: 04/20/2006 1458Client Matrix: Water Date Received: 04/24/20060815

1 6010B Inductively Coupled Plasma - Atomic Emission Spectrometry-Total Recoverable

Method: 6010B Analysis Batch: 660-24490 Instrument ID: TJAICPPreparation: 3005A Prep Batch: 660-24347 Lab File ID: 6D28BDilution: 1.0 Initial Weight/Volume: 50 mLDate Analyzed: 04/28/2006 1247 Final Weight/Volume: 50 mLDate Prepared: 04/26/2006 1312


Lead 0.0016 U 0.0016 0.0050Antimony 0.0036 U 0.0036 0.0060

„ T Page 11 of 27STL Tampa a

Analytical Data


Client Sample ID: Dupe-1 042006





Lead 0.0016 U 0.0016 0.0050Antimony 0.0036 U 0.0036 0.0060

OT1 T Page 12 of 27STL Tampa a

Analytical Data




6010B Inductively Coupled Plasma -Atomic Emission Spectrometry-Total Recoverable . .,

Method: 6010B Analysis Batch: 660-24490 Instrument ID: TJAICPPreparation: 3005A Prep Batch: 660-24347 Lab File ID: 6D28BDilution: 1.0 Initial Weight/Volume: 50 mLDate Analyzed: 04/28/2006 1258 Final WeightA/olume: 50 mLDate Prepared: 04/26/2006 1312


Lead 0.0016 U 0.0016 0.0050Antimony 0.021 0.0036 0.0060


Analytical Data







Lead 0.0016 U 0.0016 0.0050Antimony 0.032 0.0036 0.0060

Page 14 of 27STL Tampa y

Analytical Data







Lead 0.0016 U 0.0016 0.0050Antimony 0.0036 U 0.0036 0.0060


Client: QORE Property Science


Analytical Data


Lab Sample ID:Client Matrix:

Method:Preparation:Dilution:Date Analyzed:Date Prepared:

Analyte

LeadAntimony

660-8642-10Water

6010B Inductively

601 OB3005A1.004/28/2006 132304/26/2006 1312

Date Sampled: 04/20/2006 1159Date Received: 04/24/2006 0815

Coupled Plasma - Atomic Emission

Analysis Batch: 660-24490Prep Batch: 660-24347

Result (mg/L)

0.0270.037

Spectrometry-Total Recoverable

Instrument ID:Lab File ID:Initial Weight/Volume:Final Weight/Volume:

Qualifier MDL

0.00160.0036

TJA ICP6D28B50 mL50 mL

PQL

0.00500.0060

601 OB Inductively Coupled Plasma -Atomic Emission Spectrometry-Dissolved

Method:Preparation:Dilution:Date Analyzed:Date Prepared:

Analyte

601 OB3005A1.004/28/2006 132804/26/2006 1312

Lead, DissolvedAntimony, Dissolved


Result (mg/L)

0.0150.037

Instrument ID:Lab File ID:Initial Weight/Volume:Final WeightA/olume:

Qualifier MDL

0.00160.0036


PQL

0.00500.0060

STL TampaPage 16 of 27


Analytical Data



Lab Sample ID:Client Matrix:

660-8642-11Water

Date Sampled: 04/21/2006 1035Date Received: 04/24/2006 0815


Method: 601 OBPreparation: 3005ADilution: 1.0Date Analyzed: 04/28/2006 1334Date Prepared: 04/26/2006 1312


Instrument ID: TJAICPLab File ID: 6D28BInitial WeightA/olume: 50 mLFinal WeightA/olume: 50 mL

Analyte Result (mg/L) Qualifier MDL

601 OB Inductively Coupled Plasma -Atomic Emission Spectrometry-Dissolved

PQL

LeadAntimony

0.0120.0097

0.00160.0036

0.00500.0060

Method:Preparation:Dilution:Date Analyzed:

6010B3005A1.004/28/2006 1339


Date Prepared: 04/26/2006 1312

Instrument ID:Lab File ID:Initial WeighWolume:Final WeightA/olume:



Lead, DissolvedAntimony, Dissolved

0.00230.012

0.00160.0036

0.00500.0060

STL TampaPage 17 of 27

Analytical Data







Antimony 0.090 0.0036 0.0060

„, T Page 18 of 27STL Tampa a

Analytical Data


Client Sample ID: MW-7A 042106

Lab Sample ID: 660-8642-13 Date Sampled: 04/21/20060845Client Matrix: Water Date Received: 04/24/2006 0815

601 OB Inductively Coupled Plasma - Atomic Emission Spectrometry-Total Recoverable

Method: 601 OB Analysis Batch: 660-24490 Instrument ID: TJAICPPreparation: 3005A Prep Batch: 660-24347 Lab File ID: 6D28BDilution: 1.0 Initial Weight/Volume: 50 mLDate Analyzed: 04/28)2006 1349 Final Weight/Volume: 50 mLDate Prepared: 04/26/2006 1312


Lead 0.24 0.0016 0.0050Antimony 0.030 0.0036 0.0060

Page 19 of 27STL Tampa

Analytical Data


Client Sample ID: EB-1

Lab Sample ID: 660-8642-14 Date Sampled: 04/21/2006 0930

Client Matrix: Water Date Received: 04/24/20060815('[ • ^ ^ ^ • ^ • ••••• • • ••'• ^ •'•••• ^ ^ •' ^ ^ ^ ••••• • ^ ^ • •• '• •• • •• •' ^ • ••••• ^ • ••••• • ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ •••• ^ ^ ••i ^ M^ BMi BWuf

6010B Inductively Coupled Plasma - Atomic Emission Spectrometry-Total Recoverable -»ii<-

Method: 601 OB Analysis Batch: 660-24490 Instrument ID: TJAICP

Preparation: 3005A Prep Batch: 660-24347 Lab File ID: 6D28B

Dilution: 1.0 Initial Weight/Volume: 50 mL

Date Analyzed: 04/28/2006 1354 Final Weight/Volume: 50 mL

Date Prepared: 04/26/2006 1312


Lead • 0.0016 U 0.0016 0.0050Antimony 0.0036 U 0.0036 0.0060

STL Tampa Page 20 of 27

DATA REPORTING QUALIFIERS


Lab Section Qualifier Description

Metals

U Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but notdetected.

The reported value is between the laboratory method detectionlimit and the laboratory practical quantitation limit.

STL Tampa

Page 21 of 27

QUALITY CONTROL RESULTS

f=

STL Tampa

Page 22 of 27


Quality Control Results


Method Blank - Batch: 660-24347

Lab Sample ID: MB660-24347/1-AClient Matrix: WaterDilution: 1.0Date Analyzed: 04/28/2006 1145Date Prepared: 04/26/2006 1312

Analysis Batch: 660-24490Prep Batch: 660-24347Units: mg/L

Method: 6010BPreparation: 3005ATotal Recoverable

Instrument ID: TJA ICPLab File ID: 6D28BInitial Weight/Volume: 50 mLFinal Weight/Volume: 50 mL

Analyte Result Qual MDL

Laboratory Control/Laboratory Control Duplicate Recovery Report - Batch: 660-24347

PQL

LeadLead, DissolvedAntimonyAntimony, Dissolved

0.00160.00160.00360.0036

UUUU

0.00160.00160.00360.0036

0.00500.00500.00600.0060

LCS Lab Sample ID: LCS 660-24347/2-AClient Matrix: WaterDilution: 1.0Date Analyzed: 04/28/2006 1151Date Prepared: 04/26/2006 1312


Method: 6010BPreparation: 3005ATotal Recoverable

Instrument ID: TJA ICPLab File ID: 6D28BInitial WeightA/olume: 50 mLFinal Weight/Volume: 50 mL

LCSD Lab Sample ID: LCSD 660-24347/3-AClient Matrix: WaterDilution: 1.0Date Analyzed: 04/28/2006 1156Date Prepared: 04/26/2006 1312



% Rec.Analyte

LeadLead, DissolvedAntimonyAntimony, Dissolved

LCS

1041049494

LCSD

1021029292

Limit

75-12575-12575-12575-125

RPD

3322

RPD Limit LCS Qual

20202020

LCSD Qual

Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results.



Quality Control Results


Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery Report - Batch: 660-24347

Method: 601 OBPreparation: 3005ATotal Recoverable

MS Lab Sample ID:Client Matrix:Dilution:Date Analyzed:Date Prepared:

MSD Lab Sample ID:Client Matrix:Dilution:Date Analyzed:Date Prepared:

660-8642-1Water

1.004/28/2006 122204/26/2006 1312

660-8642-1Water1.004/28/2006 122704/26/2006 1312



Instrument ID: TJA ICPLab File ID: 6D28BInitial Weight/Volume: 50 mLFinal Weight/Volume: 50 ml


Analyte

% Rec.MS MSD Limit RPD RPD Limit MS Qual MSDQual

Lead

Lead, Dissolved

Antimony

Antimony, Dissolved

1001009292

1011019191

75-125

75-125

75-125

75-125

20

20

20

20

Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results.


Serial Number 339^4ANALYSIS REQUEST AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD

STLSTL Tampa6712 Benjamin Road, Suite 100Tampa, FL 33634

Website: www.stt-inc.comPhone: (813)885-7427Fax: (813)885-7049

Alternate Laboratory NameAocationPhone:Fax:

PROJECT REFERENCE PROJECT NO. PROJECT LOCATION(STATE)

MATRIXTYPE REQUIRED ANALYSIS

SAMPLER'S SIGN

S-AlTURE P.O. NUMBER CONTRACT NO.

CUENT (SITE) PM CLIENT PHONE CUENT FAX

CUENT NAME aiENT E-MAIL

CUENT ADDRESS,

COMPANY CONTRACTING Tlfe WORK (if applicable)

SAMPLEDATE TIME

PO

SAMaE IDENTIFICATION UESO

yiJLLJ

NUMBER Of CONTAINERS SUBMITTED

STANDARD REPORTDELIVERY

DATE DUE

EXPEDITED REPORTDELIVERY O>(SURCHARGE)

DATE DUE

NUMBER OF COOLERS SUBMITTEDPER SHIPMENT:

REMARKS

££±

1117 t >_t0

f -13

V7&U

DATE TIME £USTODY\NTACT.''YES O.

NO • O

CUSTODY:SEAL NO.

STL TAMPA LABORATORY REMARKS

STL824M60 (12/02)

Serial Number 33915 k

ANALYSIS REQUEST AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD <35 STL Tampaft 6712 Benjamin Road, Suite 100

Tampa, FL 33634

Website: www.stinnc.comPhone: <813) 885-7427Fax: (813)885-7049

C> Alternate Laboratory NameAocationPhone:Fax:

PROJECT REFEREN PROJECT NO. PROJECT LOCATION(STATE)

MATRIXTYPE REQUIRED ANALYSIS PAGE *•)

OCOF/0

P.O. NUMBER CONTRACT NO.

CLIENT (SITE) PM CLIENT PHONE CLIENT FAX

CLIENT NAME CLIENT E-MA1

CLIENT ADDRESS

COMPANY CONTRACTING THISWORK^f applicable)

OR

SAMPLEDATE TIME

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION

INUMBER OF CONTAINERS SUBMITTED

STANDARD REPORTDELIVERY

DATE DUE

EXPEDITED REPORTDELIVERY <O(SURCHARGE)

DATE DUE

NUMBER OF COOLERS SUBMITTEDPER SHIPMENT:

REMARKS

II)

BY: (SIGNATURE) TIME DATE TIME /•

DATE TIME DATE TIME

LABORATORYUSE ONLY

DATE TIME CUSTODV-INTftaYES c^N0 o

CUSTODY'.SEAL NO.

STL TAMPALOG NO.

LABORATORY .REMARKS

ILL

STL8240«0 (12/02)

LOGIN SAMPLE RECEIPT CHECK LIST


Login Number: 8642

Question T/F/NA CommentRadioactivity either was not measured or, if measured, is at or below background NA

The cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact. NA

The cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or tampered with. True

Samples were received on ice. False metal samples

Cooler Temperature is acceptable. NA

Cooler Temperature is recorded. NA

COC is present. True

COC is filled out in ink and legible. True

COC is filled out with all pertinent information. True

There are no discrepancies between the sample IDs on the containers and the TrueCOC.Samples are received within Holding Time. True

Sample containers have legible labels. True

Containers are not broken or leaking. True

Sample collection date/times are provided. True

Appropriate sample containers are used. True

Sample bottles are completely filled. True

There is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested MS/MSDs True

VOA sample vials do not have headspace or bubble is <6mm (1/4") in diameter. True

If necessary, staff have been informed of any short hold time or quick TAT needs True

Multiphasic samples are not present. True

Samples do not require splitting or compositing. True

L...STL Tampa Page 27 of 27

Q O RE"P R O P E R T Y S C I E N C E !

WATER LEVEL DATA

CLIENT_

JOB NO. _

LOCATION

DATE

BY ft

MEASURING DEVICE DATUMr

WELLNUMBER

TOP OF CASINGELEVATION

DEPTH TOWATER

WATERELEVATION

TIME REMARKS

-10

llu-b id. o

/x

Muu- J)ry

-9

/<?•-,COMMENTS

DEP-SOP-001/01FT 1200 Field Measurement of Specific Conductance

m

Form FD 9000-8: FIELD INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION RECORDS

INSTRUMENT (MAKER/MODEL#)/^/^;Vc-AôINSTRUMENT #2$)5(f

PARAMETER: [check only one]

D TEMPERATURE D CONDUCTIVITY D SALINITY Q pH D ORP

fefTURBIDITY D RESIDUAL Cl D DO D OTHER

STANDARDS: [Specify the type(s) of standards used for calibration, the origin of the standards, the standardvalues, and the date the standards were prepared or purchased]

Standard A

Standard B

Standard C

BATE- : TIME(hnmin)

STD(A.B.C)

STD 'VALUE.

JNSTROWENT '% DEV

CALIBRATED;:(YES,NO)

i'jSA'MPLER

A. /^_

(ell?

pea

$QC_/h

Gift

ono

Page 8 of 8 Revision Date: February 1, 2004



INSTRUMENT (MAKERJMODELfl)


INSTRUMENT 71

VJ^TTEMPERATURE D CONDUCTIVITY D SALINITY DPH DORP

n TURBIDITY D RESIDUAL Cl D DO D OTHER

STANDARDS: [Specifythe type(s) of standards used for calibration, the origin of the standards, the standardvalues, and the date the standards were prepared or purchased]

Standard A A^T 5 T

Standard B

Standard C

(Vy/miWdd)TIME(hr.min)

STD(A,B,C)

sipVALUE

INSfRlJ.K/IENT -•/R'ESROfiSE ' %DEV

CAtlBRATCD: (YES. NO)

-TVRE '. • •'^SAMPLER>:. INITIALS

A.A.

3$.

tin A- 3731

Ta_ A-AA.



i


INSTRUMENT (MAKER/MODEL^jTs' ^ $5 INSTRUMENT


D TEMPERATURE D CONDUCTIVITY Q SALINITY D pH Q ORP

Q TURBIDITY n RESIDUAL Cl ""gToO Q OTHER


Standard A C<- /c ^j

Standard B Z

Standard C

ft

(yy/mhn/dd)TIME

(hrmin)STD

(A,B.C)

A.

A-

A

STDVALUE

2

- iKlSfRiJMENT

7 7-

7- 3-

.11

DEV

V

05

CALIBRATED(YES, NO) (iNITv.CONT)

7

ViSAMPUER.-INITIALS



L-


INSTRUMENT (MAKER/MODEL#CO/c HeW* INSTRUMENT #5% 3 /


D TEMPERATURE ^CONDUCTIVITY DSALINITYDpH D ORP

D TURBIDITY D RESIDUAL Cl Q DO Q OTHER


Standard A

Standard B

Standard C

(yy/mVn/dd)TIME(hrmin)

STD(A.B.C)

Vt

JL

A_

A13A

STDVALUE.

«>

.INSTROMENT "•%DEV

CALIBRATED: (YES, NO) (iNllTy.CQNT)

•:iSAMRLER



Form FD 9000-8: FIELD) INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION RECORDS

INSTRUMENT (MAKERyMODEUfl9/VtP/1


INSTRUMENT

D TEMPERATURE D CONDUCTIVITY Q SALINITY QfpH

D TURBIDITY D RESIDUAL Cl D DO Q OTHER

ORP


Standard A

Standard B

Standard C fO - °°

(fa/mfn/dd)TIME

(hrmin)STD

(A. B. C)STD

VALUE.INSTRUMENT '.-RESFJDNSE , % DEV

CALIBRATED.(YES. NO)

. : :TYRE ' ;(iNIT,C0NT)

.:.;SAMRLER^."INITIALS

C

ABI TTi

7°*-JoL

S.-W

A7^5-3 -11


DEP-SOP-001/01FT 1200 Field Measuremenl of Specific Conductance

r


INSTRUMENT (MAKER/MODEL*) Vfe^CvStT' INSTRUMENT # Qfy g


D TEMPERATURE Q CONDUCTIVITY D SALINITY Q pH D ORP

n TURBIDITY D RESIDUAL Cl [po fj OTHER

STANDARDS: [Specify the type(s) of standards used for calibration, the origin, of the standards, the standardvalues, and the date the standards were prepared or purchased)

Standard A

Standard B.

Standard C

(yy/m/n/dd)TIME(hrmin)

STD(A,B,C)

ft

A.

A6

STDVALUE

UF/f

S

SeiaOj

.INSTRUMENT ''RESRtJNSE

A. % D.EV

CALIBRATED: (YES. NO)

u

.U

U

; (JNIT, :CONT)

( V

It

• -SAMPLER>. 'INITIALS




INSTRUMENT (MAKERyMODEL#) ^CnlT^L INSTRUMENT # \<f( -J&&


^TEMPERATURE D CONDUCTIVITY D SALINITYD pH D ORP

D TURBIDITY D RESIDUAL Cl • D DO Q OTHER

STANDARDS: [Specify the iype(s) ot standards used for calibration, the origin of the standards, the standardvalues, and the date the standards were prepared or purchased]

Standard A

Standard B

Standard C

(tfy/mfn/dd)

\A

TIME(hr.min)

STD(A.B.C)

A

4*.A&.

STDVALUE

.INSTRUWENT ••••RlESR.6'SSE %DEV

CALIBRATED(YES. NO)

M

..iSAMRUER




INSTRUMENT (MAKER/MODELS) kUioTTg ^^NSTRUMENT #

PARAMETER: [check only one] HJUT

D TEMPERATURE D CONDUCTIVITY Q SALINITY Q pH Q ORP

'QTURBIDITY D RESIDUAL Cl D DO Q OTHER


Standard A

Standard B

Standard C

(yy/irirtVdd)TIME(hrmin)

STD(A, B,C)

STDVALUE

INSTRUMENT ~% D.EV

CAblBRATED(YES, NO)

-• -TYPE -(JNIT, CQN.TJ

V-iSAMRLERf. INiJTIALS

4(-

4L•MTV te

M

v «

A

Page 8 of 8 Revision Date: February 1. 2004

DEP-SOP-001/01FT 1200 Field Measurement of Specific. Conductance

i-

Form FD 9000-8: FIELD INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION RECORDSoAt-t* N>

INSTRUMENT (MAKER/MODELS) 1/J,<p& INSTRUMENT #


D TEMPERATURE D CONDUCTIVITY Q SALlNITYHj^H Q ORP

n TURBIDITY D RESIDUAL Cl D DO D OTHER

STANDARDS: [Specify the type(s) ol standards used for calibration, the origin of the standards, the standardvalues, and the date the standards were prepared or purchased]

Standard A _Jj

Standard B t.

Standard C I

v\

TIME(hrmin)

i$3k

STD(A. B. C)

C

STD .VALUE

:INSTR(JMENT%DEV

-

q.'qre

CAlilBRATED(YES, NO)

( r

, (INITV;CQNTJ XMNITIALS



Form FD 9000-8: FIELD^^JRUMENT CALIBRATION RECORDS

INSTRUMENT (MAKER/MODEL*) \°|3£0 - qfi INSTRUMENT #


D TEMPERATURE .CONDUCTIVITY Q SALINITY D pH Q ORP

D TURBIDITY D RESIDUAL Cl D DO D OTHER _

STANDARDS: [Specify the type(s) of standards used (or calibration, the origin of the standards, the standardvalues, and the date the standards ware prepared or purchased]

Standard A

Standard B

Standard C

(Vy/mm/dd)TIME(hrmin)

STD(A. B. C)

STD .VALUE.

INSTRUMENT'. % DEV

CAl:IBRAT.ED(YES. NO) (iNIT,:,CQNJ)

£

.-:SAMRLER>: 'INITIALS

AT

I f (Xu.

.&-

vt A. v /

PageS of 8 Revision Date: February 1, 2004

Q O R EP R O P E R T Y S C I E N C E S GROUND WATER SAMPLING LOG

NAM,:SITELOCATION:

DATE:

PURGING DAT A'

DIAMETER (inches):

TUBING . 2 5"DIAMETER (inches):

WELL SCREEN INTERVAL

DEPTH./ (eel to feet4^-EPTH

STATIC DEPTH

TO WATER (feet):

PURGE PUMPV

OR BAILER:WELL VOLUME PURGE: 1 WELL VOLUME = (TOTAL WELL DEPTHonly fill out if applicable) (~ I ~ s

gallons > (j i,c,

c 7£>

STATIC DEPTH TO WATER) X WELL CAPACITY. ,i feel- _, feel) X\l\ Q •((A; gallons/fool =

EQUIPMENT VOLUME PURGE: 1 EQUIPMENT VOL. = PUMP VOLUME* (TUBING CAPACITY X(only fill out if applicable)

=: gallons * ( gallons/fool X

TUBING LENGTH)* FLOW CELL VOLUME

feet) + gallons = gallons

INITIAL PUMP OR TUBINGDEPTH IN WELL (feet):

FINAL PUMP OR TUBINGDEPTH IN WIHLL (feel): '|2_v

PURGINGINITIATED AT: I j^j

PURGINGENDED AT:

TOTAL VOLUMEPURGED (gallons):

TIMEVOLUMEPURGED(gallons)

CDMUL.VOLUMEPURGED(gallons)

PURGERATE(gpm)

DEPTHTO

WATER(feet)

pH(standard

units)

TEMP.COND.

(pmhos7cmor pSfcm)

DISSOLVEDOXYGEN

(circle mg/L or% saturation)

TURBIDITY(NTUs)

COLOR(describe)

ODOR(describe)

J&

U.

£-*£ 3 .'^4^ti quL_2jj£.

L "£

WELL CAPACITY (Gallons Per Foot): 0.75" = 0.02; I" = 0.04:- 1.25" = 0.06; 2" = 0.16; 3" = 0.37; 4" = 0.65; 5" =1.02; 6" =1.47; 12"=5.B8TUBING INSIDE D1A. CAPACITY (GaUFLt W = 0.0006; 3J1S"= 0.0014; 1/4" = 0.0026; 5/16'= 0.004; 3/8" = 0.006; 1f2' = 0.01Q; 5/8'

SAMPLING DATA

CONTAINERSVOLUME

PRESERVATIVEUSED

TOTAL VOLDDED IN FIELD (mL)

RNALPH

INTENDEDANALYSIS AND/OR

. METHOD

SAMPUNGEQUIPMENT

CODE

TT_&

REMARKS:

MATERIAL CODES: AG= Amber Glass: CG = Clear GlassyC—PE = Polyelrvlene; PP = Polypropylene; S = Sillcone; T = Teflon; 6 = Other (Specify)

SAMPUNG/PURGING APP = After Peristaltic Pump; B = Baner. BP = Bladder Pump; ESP = Bectric Submersible Pump; PP = Peristaltic PumpEQUIPMENT CODES: RFPP = Reverse Flow PerisSilSc Pump; SM = Straw Method (Tubing Gravity Drain); VT = Vacuum Trap; O = Other (Specify)

NOTES: 1. Tha above do not constitute all of the information required by Chapter 62-160, F.A.C.2. STABILIZATION CRITERIA FOR RANGE OF VARIATION OF LAST THREE CONSECUTIVE READINGS (SEE FS 2212. SECTION 3)

pH: + 0.2 units Temperature: + 02 °C Specific Conductance: ± 5% Dissolved Oxygen: all readings < 20% saturation (see Table FS 2200-2);optionally, + 0.2 mg/L or + 10% (whichever is greater) Turbidity: all readings f 20 NTU; optionally + 5 NTU or + 10% (whichever is greater)

Q O R E'P R O P E R T Y S C I E N C E GROUND WATER SAMPLING LOG

SITENAME:

SITELOCATION:

WELL NO: - J SAMPLE , DATE:

PURGING DATAELL -

DIAMETER (inches): /

TUBINGDIAMETER (inches):./y WELL SCREEN! INTERVAL

DEPTH: £> feet to feelSTATIC DEPTH

TO WATER (feet):-7 A/ PURGE PUMP TjYPE,

: /' /6 OR BAILER: /V//WELL VOLUME PURGE: 1 WELL VOLUME = (TOTAL WELL DEPTH - STATIC DEPTH TO WATER) X WELL CAPACITYonly fill out it applicable) "-7 ,_ . , •-> "7 _ t f ( . feel- — , a/ feel) X

gallons ,/£gallons/lool =

EQUIPMENT VOLUME PURGE: 1 EQUIPMEMT VOL. = PUMP VOLUME + (TUBING CAPACITY[only fill out if applicable)

gallons *( gallons/fool X

TUBING LENGTH) + FLOW CELL VOLUME

feet)* gallons = gallons

INITIAL PUMP OR TUBINGDEPTH IN WELL (feet): [ &

RNAL PUMP OR TUBING ^fDEPTH IN WELL (feet): fa

PURGINGINITIATED AT;

PURGING SENDED AT: /C ^jf

TOTAL VOLUME •">PURGED (gallons)L>


CUMULVOLUMEPURGED(gallons)

PURGERATE

DEPTHTO

WATER(feet)

pH(standard

units)

TEMP.COND.

(pmhos/cmw >iS/cm)

DISSOLVEDOXYGEN


TURBIDITY(NTUs)

COLOR(describe)

ODOR(describe)

E3 .37/tf/D -2! /y

4H 7^3 2?A 33

,/(* 35-7^7 .fS

WELL CAPACITY (Gallons Per Foot): D.75" = 0.02; r = 0.04;- 1.25" = u.06; 2- = 0.16; 3" = OJ7; 4" = 0.65; 5"=1.02; 6"=1.47; 12" =5.88TUBING INSIDE DIA.CAPACITY (GaL/FL): 1<B' = 0.0006; 3)16'= 0.0014; 1J4' = 0.0026: 5/16'= 0.004; 3/g- = 0.006; 1/2" = 0.010: 5)8" = 0.016

SAMPLING DATASAMPLED BY (PRINT) ; AFFILIATION:

PUMP OR TUBING , ^ '.DEPTH IN WELL (feet): IO

HELD DECONTAMINATION: "Y fiT)

SAMPLE CONTAINERSPECIFICATION

SAMPLE IDCODE CONTAINERS

/

J

MATERIALCODE

ff

"*-

SAMPLER(3) SIGNATURES:

SAMPLE PUMP //FLOW RATE1 (mL perjninute): i * «

fiSSSSnlê: " ^^^ +

VOLUME

2&»t'*-

SAMPLING SAMPLING _ ( sINrfUTEDAT: JQ J^ C" ENDED AT: /Q"^ C

TUBING —^ ^ :MATERIAL CODE /, J>

— |Un

SAMPLE PRESERVATION

PRESERVATIVEUSED

/ *^?3*'~-

TOTAL VOLADDED IN REID (mL)

yi/s4-r f-

RNALPH

2.

x7

DUPLICATE: Y /&} .


METHOD

Fb $Lpt*fas^

SAMPLINGEQUIPMENT

CODE

sfrfif0

^-~-

REMARKS: ' » f I , ::. , '

MATERIAL CODES: ' AG = Amber Glass; CG = Dear GlassyS— PE = Polyethylene; PP = Polypropylene; S = Silicons; T = Teflon; 0 = Other (Specify)

SAMPLINGJPURGING APP = After Peristaltic Pump; B = Baiter; BP = Bladder Pump; ESP = Bectric Submersible Pump; PP = Perislaltic PumpEQUIPMENT CODES: RFPP = Reverse Flow Peristaltic Pump; SM = Straw Method (Tubing Gravity Drain); VT = Vacuum Trap; O = Other (Specify)

NOTES: 1. The above do not constitute all of the information required by Chapter 82-160, F.A.C.2. STABILIZATION CRITERIA FOR RANGE OF VARIATION OF LAST THREE CONSECUTIVE READINGS (SEE FS 2212. SECTION 3j

pH: ± 02 units Temperature: + 0^ °C Specific Conductance: ± 5% Dissolved Oxygen: all readings < 20% saturation (see Table FS 2200-2);optionally, + 0.2 mg/L or + 10% (whichever is greater) Turbidity: all readings < 20 NTU: optionally +; 5 NTU or + 10% (whichever is greater)

a o RP R O P E R T Y S C I E N C E S GROUND WATER SAMPLING LOG

PURGING DAtA'WELL 4 "

DIAMETER (inches):

TUBING . J^" "

DIAMETER (inches):


DEPTH: jrt feeuo <J~ ieetSTATIC DEPTH PURGE PUMP TYPE

TO WATER (feel): [/ fj-f ' OR BAILER; p C"V2-t

WELL VOLUME PURGE: 1 WELL VOLUME = (TOTAL WELL DEPTH - STATIC DEPTH TO WATER) X WELL CAPACITYonly fill out if applicable) . -^ = ( I L feet- . - feel)

gallons^^- ^ ^5- | UL)V - .4.2? \ Y - 6<f U • T 5"

X gallons/foot =

.IkEQUIPMENT VOLUME PURGE: 1 EQUIPMENT VOL. = PUMP VOLUME + (TUBING CAPACITY X TUBING LENGTH) + FLOWCELL VOLUMEonly fill oul f applicable)

= gallons + ( gallons/foot X feel) + gallons = gallons

INITIAL PUMP OR TUBING , /-.DEPTH IN WELL (feel): ( ($ J-Jc

TIME

\&\ "7(iVTiA

ji^2;3

:f^\\{024

VOLUMEPURGED(gallons)

d.s'0.T

d.«r

^ £r

CUUULVOLUMEPURGED(gallons)

FINAL PUMP OR TUBINGDEPTH IN WELL (feet): | ^.

0..CT

\* Î . CT

5-ti'

PURGE

(gpm)

$2>

-/-fr

.li /

DEPTHTO

WATERfleet)

i % C^v

f m (Pr

~~)î

"?.^t?

pH(standard

units)

k.rtf-

S".g^^jf

5" 8^

PURGING PURGING . -INITIATED AT: iqfe ENDED AT: | 02-^

TEMP.

^H-32-vl*^?ni-J

^.•x

COND.(pmhos/craor )j Stan)

cJ"T7viC.

£-UTuJ

J7Û<

2"-|SL«L

DISSOLVEDOXYGEN


1.2.4

l'%"/I -7)^

(."^^

TOTAL VOLUMEPURGED (gallons): d<' P$

TURBIDITY(NTUs)

^•Z..-f

i (^

1 t

V/EU- CAPACITY (Gallons Per Foot): 0.75" = 0.02; 1" = 0.04:- 1.25" =0.06; 2" = 0.16; 3" = 0.37; 4" = 0.65; 5" =1.02;TUBING INSIDE DIA. CAPACITY (GaUFL): 1/8" = O.D006; 3yi6' = 0.0014; 1/4- = O.Q026; 5/16- = 0.004; 3/8" = 0.006; 1/2"

COLOR(describe)

/yjid_f^flA) A

A.yq.

ODOR(describe)

(Oft-W P^rJ1^

D/A-

B"=1.47; 12° = 538= 0.010; 5IB- = 0.016

SAMPLING DATASAMPLED BY (PRINT) /AFRL1AT1ON: SAMPLERS) SIGNATURES:

PUMP OR TUBING f^ f"» ^MPLfrPUMPy*- V^DEPTH IN WELL (feet): \tt> \>V I >LOW rWTS.(mL_pefmin>

TUBING ' 'ife): MATERIAL CODE r r

„ l/-\ RELD-FILTERED: Y /T^ FILTER SfflHELD DECONTAMINATION: Y / ) Ration Equipment Type: C^

SAMPLE CONTAINERT .SPEC1RCAT10N

SAMPVE1DCODE

#CONTAINERS

\

MATERIALCODE

fP

VOLUME

£5fthL

t:. • |i/n

SAMPLE PRESERVATION

PRESERVATIVEUSED

iVirw

TOTAL VOL^DDED IN FIELD (mL)

'

FINALPH

DUPLICATE

SAMPLING 'ENDED AT: ^ff)7ft

r f^\

INTENDEDANALYSIS ANtVOR

METHOD

§P jfiR«G*=ft

SAMPLINGEQUIPMENT

CODE

ATP

REMARKS: , ,-.-

MATERIAL CODES: AG = Amber Glass: CG = Clear Glass>5 -P£ = Polyethylene: PP = Polypropylene: S = Snicone; T = Teflon; O = Other (Specify)

SAMPLING/PURGING APP = After Peristaltic Pump: B = Bailer; BP = Bladder Pump: ESP = Electric Submersible Pump:EQUIPMENT CODES: RFPP = Reverse Row Peristaltic Pump; SM = Straw Method (Tubing Gravity Drain); VT = Vacuum Trap;

PP = Peristaltic PumpO = Other (Specify)

NOTES: 1. The above do not constitute all of the information required by Chapter 62-150, F.A.C.2 STABILIZATION CRITERIA FOR RANG EOF VARIATION OF LAST THREE CONSECUTIVE READINGS(SBE FS 2212, SECTIONS)

pH: i D.2 units Temperature: + 02 °C Specific Conductance: + 5% Dissolved Oxygen: all readings < 20% saturation (see Table FS 2200-2);optionally. + 0.2 mg/L or + 10% (whichever is.greater) Turbidity: all readings < 20 NTU; optionally ± 5 MTU or± 10% (whichever is greater)

Q O RP R O P E R T Y S C I E N C E S GROUND WATER SAMPLING LOG

LOCATION:

WELL NO; SAMPLE >D: DATE

PURGING bATAWELL •? Vl

DlAMETEK(inches):

TUBINGDIAMETER (inches):

WELL SCREED INTERVALDEPTH: f^Meei to / J? feel

STATIC DEPTH Q.

TO WATER (feet): /-PURGE PUMP

OR BAILER:

WELL VOLUME PURGE: 1 WELL VOLUME = (TOTAL WELL DEPTH - STATIC DEPTH TO WATER) X WELL CAPACITYonly fill out if applicable) = ( feet- . feel) X

gallons :\gallons/foot =

EQUIPMENT VOLUME PURGE: 1 EQUIPMENT VOL. = PUMP VOLUME + (TUBING CAPACITY X

gallons/foot X

.

(only fill out if applicable) r T - ^ {\/ „ OC< ^'.^ V*-'' J l*' - £>£> 'gallons *( -O

TUBING LENGTH) * FLOW CELL VOLUME

If "^[ (j, feet) +

; -j

'93'lons = gallons

INITIAL PUMP OR TUBING ifDEPTH IN WELL (feet). / (j>

RNAL PUMP OR TUBING i /"DEPTH IN WEiLL (feel):

PURGINGINITIATED A

PURGING TOTAL VOLUMEPURGED (gallons): 1^


CUMUL.VOLUMEPURGED(gallons)

PURGERATE(gpm)

DEPTHTO

WATER(feel)

PH(standard

units)

TEMP.COND.

((jmhos/cm01 (jS/cm)

DISSOLVEDOXYGEN


TURBIDITY(NTUs)

COLOR(describe)

ODOR(describe)

:. M-

<N A

"WELL CAPACrTY (Gallons Per Foot): 0.75" = 0.02; H" = 0.04; 1.25" = 0.06; 2" = 0.16: 3" = OJ7; 4" = O.B5; 5"=1.02; 6" = 1.47: 12" = 538TUBING INSIDE DIA. CAPACITY(GaL/FL): 1/B" = 0.0006; 316'= 0.0014; IM'^0.0026; 5/16'= 0.004; 3/8" = 0.006; 1/2" = 0.010; 5/8'

SAMPLING DATASAMPLED BY (PRINT) ; AFFILIATION:

&*?& *PUMFORTUBING \A fDEPTH \NWELL (feel): VU> i~ (

RB.D DECONTAMINATION: "Y frJJ)


SAMPLE IDCODE

ffCONTAINERS

\

MATERIALCODE

f?

SAfiPUBâ^SlGM

> j2^ 'Y r<£L~\~J\ SAMPLING Q ^_ SAMPLINGENDED AT: g C.J <-J

/SAtiH'JLjEp.lJVlPf' y\L;W Ty " TUBING ,-j/OFLO)W"RATe (mtsper mln ter ^ MATERIAL CODE: \\

~-Rd-D-RLTERED:' r t3/ FILTER SIZE: • pmfiltration Equipment Type:

VOLUME

^S iJ

SAMPLE PRESERVATION

PRESERVATIVEUSED

V^^?5

TOTAL VOL*DDED IN RELD (mL)

'

RNALPH

/-Z

.DUPLICATE- Y fe)


METHOD

r"Y(p ^11

.

SAMPLINGEQUIPMENT

CODE

-A-^ff\

r~^"REMARKS: ' , .:- .

MATERIAL CODES: AG = Amber Glass; CG = Clear Glassyt— PE = Polyethylene; ' PP = Polypropylene; S = Sillcone: T = Teflon; 0 = Other (Specify)

SAMPUNG/PURGINS APP = After. Peristaltic Pump; B = Bailer; BP = Bladder Pump: ESP = Electric Submersible Pump;EQUIPMENT CODES: RFPP = Reverse Row Peristaltic Pump; SM = Straw Method (Tubing Gravity Drain); VT = Vacuum Trap:


2. STABILIZATION CmrERiA FOR FLANGE OF VARIATION OF IAST THREE CONSSCUTNE READINGS (SEE FS 2212. SECTION a')

pH: i 0^ units Temperature: + 0^ °C Specific Conductance: + 5% Dissolved Oxygen: all readings < 20% saturation (see Table FS 2200-2);optionally, + 0.2 mg/L or + 10% (whichever is greater) Turbidity: all readings < 20 NTU; optjonally+ 5 NTUor+ 10% (whichever is greater)

R ETM

P R O P E R T Y S C I E N C E S GROUND WATER SAMPLING LOG

CA>)NAME:SITELOCATION:

WELL NO: SAMPLE IO:

PURGING DATAWELL , 'DIAMETER finches): j-

TUBING f 1.DIAMETER (inches): /y

t WELL SCREEN INTERVALDEPTH: / /feet to /^ feet

STATIC DEPTH Q _ f PURGE PUMPTO WATER (feet): / • S 1 OR BAILER: /

WELL VOLUME PURGE: 1 WELL VOLUME = (TOTAL WELL DEPTH - STATIC DEPTH TO WATER) X WELL CAPACITYonly fill out if applicable) =( feet- . ' feet) X

gallons

Ê-•^/,

gallons/foot =

EQUIPMENT VOLUME PURGE: 1 EQUIPMENT VOL. = PUMP VOLUME + (TUBING CAPACITY X TUBING LENGTH) + FLOW CELL VOLUME 1*7(only fill out if applicable) --. - if^T ,2^. nr ^ -I f

>J>'^ J f' v ~ \P 9a"ons+( ^QO IT* gallons/foot X / Jj feet) * , j £ gallons = gallons

INITIAL PUMP OR TUBING /DEPTH IN WELL (feet): ($

TIME

^ Yc£/y«?2ftillIV 1*1

ft (7


.So• fe,^5»/3>

vt/?/<^

FINAL PUMP OR TUBING ^ PURGING . PURGINGDEPTH IN WELL (feel): f ) INITIATED AT: / J?-J / ENDED AT: / *ff rf


.50

.7$/<»>0//$

PURGERATE(gpm)

.&)T

ôT.e .<:&¥

DEPTHTO

WATER(feet)

^bb?.^6.^-Crft

j- bk

?-6/

pH(standard

unils)

C. I?

Ct^QhitL- iff

1 .52

TEMP.

Zfc^L-. \ l/~

^r^-Q * /

^tf_MM

2&-1

COND.(umhosfcma (iSfcm)

?j u^

ifiu^^5Vw,5

r~J /IAJ

$f>lo3

DISSOLVEDOXYGEN

(cirde mg/L or% saturation)

*3J. H3rW

^0

. 3 ?

TOTAL VOLUME , . -PURGED (gallons) ^ ,, 0

TURBIDITY(NTUs)

/^

f~7•3^ <#-

3^5

1

WELL CAPACITY (Gallons Per Foot): 0.75" = 0.02; 1" = 0.04;- 1.25" = 0.06; 2" = 0.16; 3" = 0.37; 4" = 0.65; 5" =1.02;TUBING INSIDE DIA. CAPACITY (GaL/FL): 1/B' = 0.0006; 3/1 6" = 0.001 4; 1/4' = 0:0026; 5/1 6' = 0.004; 3/B" = 0.006; 1/2"

SAMPLING DATA

COLOR(describe)

/Z/cVV-

-— -

—

STS£>

ODOR(describe)

/^&

- —

--"r-r-

^0

6" =1.47; 12" = 5.88= 0.010; 5/8" = 0.016

SAMPLED BY (PRINT) / AFRUAT1ON:

PUMP OR TUBING / ^ *" :DB^TH IN WELL (feet): / > ^

RELDDECOMTAMINATION: 'Y (^/


SAMPLE IDCODE *CONTAINERS

/

MATERIALCODE.

ff

SAMPLERfS) SIGNATURES:. C,/ SAMPLING

73 '- fW ' ffiti<£<Jl, INfTlATEDAT: f1)/^/SAMPLE PUMP (y TUBING —f-FLOW RATS (niL per minute): * Of) MATERIAL CODE /F1B.D-FILTERED: Y (ftX} 'FILTER SC

VOLUME

teofl^

E • pm

SAMPLE PRESERVATION

PRESERVATIVEUSED

tf-ss& 3

TOTAL VOLADDED IN FIELD (mL)

" /Kx^-

RNALPH

fj

DUPLICATE:

SAMPLING *•ENDED AT: /ty/y

r (g) .


METHOD

SV? / )

.

SAMPUNGEQUIPMENT

CODE

ZL/9J3

REMARKS: , - . : • . •

MATERIAL CODES: AG = Amber Glass; CG = Clear GlassySl— PE = Polyethylene; PP = Polypropylene; S = Siltcone; T = Tefton; O = Other (Specrfy)

SAMPLING/PURGING APP = After Peristaltic Pump; B = Bailer; BP = Bladder Pump: ESP = Electric Submersible Pump;EQUIPMENT CODES: RFPP = Reverse Row Peristaltic Pump; SM = Straw Method (Tubing Gravity Drain); VT = Vacuum Trap;


NOTES: 1. The above do not constitute all of the information required by Chapter 62-160, F.A.C.2. STABILIZATION CRITERIA FOR RANGE OF VARIATION OF LAST THREE CONSECUTIVE READINGS (SEE FS 2212. SECTIONS)

pH: 102 units Temperature: + 0.2 °C Spiicific Conductance: ± 5% Dissolved Oxygen: ail readings < 20% saturation (see Table FS 2200-2);optionally, ± 0.2 mgA- or + 10% (whichever is.greater) Turbidity: all readings < 20 NTU; optionally + 5 NTU or + 10% (whichever is greater)


SITENAME &,t/\ / SITE

LOCATION:

WELL NO: . f j SAMPLE , DATE:

PURGING DATAWELL ,c

DIAMETER (inches)://

TUBING //

DIAWETER (inches): /tyWELL SCREEN INTERVALDEPTH: /^ feel to // ieet

STATIC DEPTH .

TO WATER (feel):/j£)e ^*PURGE PUMP IYPE -

1 OR BAILER: f^lf, 'WELL VOLUME PURGE: 1 WELL VOLUME = (TOTAL WELL DEPTH - STATIC DEPTH TO WATER) X WELL CAPACITYonly fill out if applicable) = ( feet- . feel) Xgallons

gallons/loot -

EQUIPMENT VOLUME PURGE: 1 EQUIPMENT VOL = PUMP VOLUME + (TUBING CAPACITY X TUBING LENGTH)* FLOW CELL VOLUME ,f(only fill out if applicable) tjCt - ~l f\f ftT-tx. S.& t* flit

t{ l^-.)£v =t ©° gallons + ( t p° gallonsVtool X j J feet)+ /^ gallons = gallons

INITIAL PUMP OR TUBING f .j 'DEPTH IN WELL (feel)'- ( J

TIME

fW

tl$B>

H$3JS^t-^

' ' 5 Cf


.*>

^ £5>

. 75«. A5"

ft*.

CUUUL.VOLUMEPURGED(gallons)

rô

vZf

/(PO

/#

FINAL PUMP OR TUBING » SDEPTH IN WELL (feel): ^ 3

PURGERATE(gpm)

,e%

te¥

.etf

DEPTHTO

WATER(feel)

/&33h. 3310-

(6 < 33

J® -33

pH(standard

units)

(-f' 7-2

^f - ft 1/ -Jii

Ce- f-0

6<2C

PURGING , . ^ PURGING _.INITIATED AT-y/3 y ENDED AT: ff)_.5

TEMP.

25 -Hfo 2*~) t* *7V*") * ^

rf\ \ _ Q

^3

COMD.(pmhosycm01 jiStan)

7^^7-31^^3Vu.^?y/<^$

^3&U$

DISSOLVEDOXYGEN


/#

/. /y/- c ?/ /o

WELL CAPACITY,(Gallons Per Foot): 0.75" = 0.02; 1" = 0.04;. 1.25" = 0.06; 2" = 0.16; 3" = 0.37; 4" = 0.65;TUBING INSIDE DIA. CAPACITY (GaUFL): 1/B" = O.OOCiB; 3M6" = 0.0014; 1/4" = 0.0026; 5M6' = 0.004; 3IBm

TOTAL VOLUME / •),-•-PURGED (gallons): /- X--5

TURBIDITY(NTUs)

//

/^ 73*52-d

/ x

5" =1.02;= 0.006; 1C"

SAMPLING DATA

COLOR(describe)

/&T&

*--

'C-

--

SVQ

ODOR(describe)

ô«~-f -

w-- ^

ê>

6" =1.47; 12° =5.88= 0.010; 5/8" = 0.016

SAMPLED BY (PRINT) / AFRUATION:

PUMP OR TUBING / "? ^DEPTH IN WELL (feetV / •-'

RELD DECONTAMINATION: 'Y ^^

SAMPLE COhJTAINERSPECIFICATION

SAMPIEIDCODE

#CONTAINERS

/

MATERIALCODE

fP

SAMPLER<S) SIGNATURES:*-?/ -^ SAMPLING .

*/3'/^^^^t/N INITIATED AT: // S Lf

SAMPLING .ENDED AT: ( Jigg)

SAMPLE PUMP ^ CX TUBING . -,— ^FLOW RATE (mL per minutet /• O 0 MATERIAL CODE / , 3

r SSuSnlType: ' nLTERS12

VOLUME

02/b><j£.

E: firh

SAMPLE PRESERVATION

PRESERVATIVEUSED

fts^>2>

TOTAL VOLADDED IN RELD (mL)

~/*sSh

RNALPH

DUPLICATE: Y ^3. •INTENDED

ANALYSIS AND/ORMETHOD

.51 fL

SAMPLINGEQUIPMENT

CODE

^ff

REMARKS: ' , .....

MATERIAL CODES: AG = Amber Glass; CG = Clear Glassy£—PE. = Polyethylene; PP = Porypropylene: S = Sillcone; T = Teflon; 0 = Other (Specify)

SAMPLING/PURGING APP = After Peristaltic Pump; B = Bailer; BP = Bladder Pump: ESP = Electric Submersible Pump;EQUIPMENT CODES: RFPP = Reverse Row Peristaltic Pump; SM = Straw Method (Tubing Gravity Drain); VT= Vacuum Trap;

PP = Peristaltic Pump0 = Other (Specify)

NOTES: 1. Tha above do not constitute all of the information required by Chapter 62-160, F.A.C.2. STABILIZATION CRITERIA FOR RANGE OF VARIATION OF LAST THREE CONSECUTIVE READINGS (SEE FS 2212. SECTIONS')

pH: ± 02 units Temperature: + 02 °C Spticific Conductance: ± 5% Dissolved Oxygen: all readings < 20% saturation (see Table FS 2200-2);optionally. ±0.2 mg/L or+ 10% (whichever is greater) Turbidity: all readings < 20 NTU; optionally ±5 NTUor;t 10% (whichever is greater)


SITENAME: LOCATION:

WELL NO: DATE:

PURGING DATAWELL

DIAMETER (inches):

TUBING

DIAMETER (inchesWELL SCREEUJNTERVAL

DEPTH: feel to < feet

WELL VOLUME PURGE: 1 WELL VOLUME = (TOTAL WELLConly fill out ii applicable) . . , <*\

gallons jp £,- O, \& I \P V " . .''

VALy

<p feSTATIC DEPTHTO WATER (feet):/ /

^>URGE PUMP TYFOR BAILER:

DEPTH - STATIC DEPTH TO WATER) X WELL CAPACITYfeel- , ^-x" feel) X

^1~>

gallons/lool =

EQUIPMENT VOLUME PURGE: 1 EQUIPMENT VOL. = PUMP VOLUME * (TUBING CAPACITY X[only fill out if applicable)

= gallons + { gallons/foot X

TUBING LENGTH) + FLOW CELL VOLUME

feet)* gallons = gallons

INITIAL PUMP OR TUBINGDEPTH IM WELL (feet): y FINAL PUMP OR TUBING

DEPTH IN WE;U- (feel):PURGINGINITIATED ATj

PURGINGENDED AT: \^,

TOTAL VOLUMEPURGED (gallons^ •tf> -fa



PURGERATE(gpm)

DEPTHTO

WATER(feet)

pH(standard

units)

TEMP. COND.(pmhosfcmor p Stan)

DISSOLVEDOXYGEN


TURBIDITY(NTUs)

COLOR(describe)

ODOR(describe)

A/A-

J0L

Vl^ft je\z$^ z5 jim

WELL CAPACITY (Gallons Per Foot): D.75" = 0.02; 1" = 0.04;. 1.25" = 0.06; 2" = 0.16; 3" = 0.37; 4" = 0.65; 5"= 1.02; 6"= 1.47;TUBING INSIDE D1A. CAPACITY (GaL/FL): MB" = 0.0006: 3/16' = 0.0014; 1/4' = Q.Q026; ai5" = 0.004; 3yB' = 0.006; 1r2' = 0.010: a8' = 0.016

SAMPLING DATASAMPLED BY (PRINT) / AFFILIATION:

PUMP-feR TUBING O ) '.DEPTH IN WELL (feet): Ly

RELD DECONTAMINATION; 'Y &\ f

SAMPLE CONTAINERSPECIRCATION


\

MATERIALCODE

fP

SAUPLHitS)3f

^"^ 1 1 tV-*"SAXi$j£WEtOWRATE

(AW

CNATURESr"1 ~N•) /J__i x-^ /I A SAMPLING/jFfegM l INmATEDAT: , y^ ,

•^/Vt I / V5V TUBING ' ^-7 —L ppr rfiinyyiL^— -f MATERIAL CODE: <T P'

'Ra.D-FI) feRE6< i<^N2_ / "FILTER SBRnrijScfiEqulpmenV Type:

VOLUME

2-59^

E. • urn

SAMPLE PRESERVATION

PRESERVATIVEUSED

ÔCu


- •

RNALPH

SAMPLINGENDED AT: 1 ?§

DUPLICATE: Y (N^ • '


METHOD

"M/ ^%. tt

SAMPLINGEQUIPMENT

CODE

-APP

REMARKS: ' , ....

MATERIAL CODES: ' AG = Amber Glass; CG = Clear Glassyfi— PE = Polyethylene; PP = Polypropylene; S = Sillcone; T = Teflon; O = Other (Specify)

SAMPUNG^PURGING APR = After Peristaltic Pump; B = Bailer. BP = Bladder Pump; ESP = Electric Submersible Pump;EQUIPMENT CODES: RFPP = Reverse Row Peristaltic Pump; SM = Straw Method (Tubing Gravity Drain); VT = Vacuum Trap;


NOTES: 1. The above do not constitute all of the information required by Chapter 62-160, F.A.C.2. STABlLKATtON CRiTERtA FOR RANGE OF VARIATION OF LAST THREE CONSECUTIVE READIN6S(5EE FS 2212. SECTION 3)

pH: + 0.2 units Temperature: 10.2 °C Specific Conductance: ± 5% Dissolved Oxygen: all readings < 20% saturation (see Table FS 2200-2);optionally, + 0.2 mg/L or ± 10% (whichever is greater) Turbidity: all readings < 20 NTU; optionally + 5 NTU or +10% (whichever is greater)

Q O R E'P R O P E R T Y S C I E N C E S GROUND WATER SAMPLING LOG

^y [en iNAME:SITELOCATION:

SAMPLE '(5 DATE:

PURGING DATAWELL »v

DIAMETER (inches): J

TUBING //

DIAMETER (inches): / ^f


DEPTH: /^ fee I to /£>feet

STATIC DEPTH / ,. -

TO WATER (feet)'^,. 0^

PURGE PUMP

OR BAILER: /r5TEC

WELL VOLUME PURGE: 1 WELL VOLUME = (TOTAL WELL DEPTH - STATIC DEPTH TO WATER) X WELL CAPACITY

only fill Dulif applicable) =( feel- . / <?yrs feel) X */ gatlonsfloDi =gallons ($.OO L*-00 - ( **

EQUIPMENT VOLUME PURGE: 1 EQUIPMENT VOL. = PUMP VOLUME +• (TUBING CAPACITY X TUBING LENGTH) + FLOW CELL VOLUME / f. -

(only fill oui if applicable) GL *~ "\ K'' v")l& (* 2.t> "^ *Ml " ' -^ t- = & ^ gallons * ( 0 * gallonsrtoot X / j 'eel) * ) 5 gallons = gallons

* ' ^ " ' 1 <S v 1 ~S

INITIAL PUMP OR TUBING -7 * FINAL PUMP OR TUBING _ X^DEPTH IN WELL (feel): / ,_) DEPTH IN WELL (feel): / .J

TIME

Q i

^J^yC?e75~^-/

*y5f/


^£"0

.25

<•/£

uflt.*

CUMUUVOLUMEPURGED(gallons)

*•>€>

,74^t&Z

PURGERATE(gpm)

.0^

.«9^'

^

DEPTHTO

WATER(feel)

7-707-G27* 7l

77H

PH(standard

unils)

X ?#"J - /(f

f" O /**

6-°°

PURGING rr^f-INITIATED AT jJiy^

TEMP.

3J-3>!3 7 *•/fl /f I

^7-5"

27-5'

COND.(pmhosfcruor pS/cm)

JcSlj;JO^CAS

Joû^J

- o5uJ!

PURGING & '"7ENDED AT: & ft f

DISSOLVEDOXYGEN


g / *)

,37,33

,33

WELL CAPACITY (Gallons Per Foot): 0.75" = 0.02; 1" = 0.04: 1.25" = 0.06; 2" = 0.1 6; 3" = 037; 4" = 0.65TUBING INSIDE D1A. CAPACITY (GaUFL): KB' = 0.0005; 3M6" = 0.0014; 1/4" = 0.0026; 5116" = 0.004; 3JB"

SAIWPLING DATA

TOTAL VOLUME .PURGED (gallons):/. &&

TURBIDITY(NTUs)

<3 /•

c-i5^7

r-y

5" = 1.02;= 0.006; 1(2"

COLOR(describe)

"~fel

^^

-jZt^

ODOR(describe)

xVO

--

r

/I/O

S"=1.47; 12" = 5.8B= 0.010; 5/8" = 0.016

SAMPLED BY (PRINT) /AFFILIATION: SAMPI_ER(S) SIGfJLATyRES:• \ \ - j f * SAMPUNG Q,

I XD<J? T- . - ^Z3' / ^2^** - ' INITIATED AT: £) /yi?

SAMPUNG (\ .ENDED AT: f^-3

PUMP OR TUBING I -j ^ ! SAMPLE PUMP /J-J?^ TUBING >— CDEPTH IN WELL (feet): f -? FLOW RATS' (mL per minuteV ' ^ O MATERIAL CODE / ^_)

FIELD DECONTAMINATION: 'Y (7?) REU>FILTERED: Y (j0 'HLTERSCI



/

MATERIALCODE

ff

VOLUME

£#>M\.

E:. • urn

SAMPLE PRESERVATION

PRESERVATIVEUSED

///"Pj

TOTAL VOLA.DDED IN FIELD (mL)

'xf>f

FINALpH

DUPLICATE: Y <££> -


METHOD

<£% fa

SAMPUNGEQUIPMENT

CODE

jfrfiP

REMARKS: ' , ,:. .

MATERIAL CODES: " AG = Amber Glass; CG = Clear GlassyS— PE. = Polyethylene; PP = Polypropylene: S = Silicone; T = Teflpn; O = Other (Specify)

SAMPLING/PURGING APP = After Peristaltic Pump; B = BaRer; BP = Bladder Pump; ESP = Electric Submersible Pump;EQUIPMENT CODES: RFPP = Reverse Row Peristaltic Pump; SM = Straw Method (Tubing Gravity Drain); VT = Vacuum Trap;

PP = PeristaldcPumpO = Other (Specify)

NOTES: 1. The above do not constitute all of the information required by Chapter 62-160, F.A.C.

2. STABILIZATION CRITERIA FOR RANGE OFVARIATION OF LAST THREE CONSECUTIVE READINGS (SEE FS 2212. SECTION 31

pH: * 0.2 unils Temperature: ± 0.2 °C Specific Conductance: ± 5% Dissolved Oxygen: all readings < 20% saturation (see Table FS 2200-2);

optionally +0 2 mg/L or + 10% (whichever is greater) Turbidity: all readings < 20 NTU; optionally + 5 NTUor+ 10% (whichever is greater)

oQ O R E'P R O P E R T Y S C I E N C E S GROUND WATER SAMPLING LOG

NAME:: /I//*) f/Ht* ^£1

SITELOCATION:

SAMPLE ID:

PURGING DATAWELL „

DIAMETER (inches): /

TUBING '/ftDIAMETER (inches): /(

WELL SCREEN INTERVALDEPTH:/%. feel to fk (eel

STATIC DEPTH Q,

TO WATER (feet): 7- /(<

PURGE PUMP-JYPEÔR BAILER: fa If,

WELL VOLUME PURGE: 1 WELL VOLUME = (TOTAL WELL DEPTH - STATIC DEPTH TO WATER) X WELL CAPACITYonly fill out if applicable) = ( feet - . . feel) Xgallons

gallons/foot =

EQUIPMENT VOLUME PURGE: 1 EQUIPMENT VOL. = PUMP VOLUME + (TUBING CAPACITY X TUBING LENGTH) + FLOW CELL VOLUME - I <y(only fill uu if applicable) ^f . -, f^/ 0/Jf tfi ^ 1 -> ''"

,St?^ O f- = 00 '"^sllons + ( f)' gallons/foot X ~)i feet)* „ / _5 gallons = gallons

INITIAL PUMP OR TUBING n /DEPTH IN WELL (feet): ptf

TIME

lf^ Y9"

ffgZ

t*t££

<X

lltt


\~15»2£*25

\^Ple-

FINAL PUMP OR TUBING . ^^ PURGING . iDEPTH IN WELL (feet): ^/ INITIATED AT: /y^/ /

CUMULVOLUMEPURGED(gallons)

*75I<GC

l~&

PURGERATE(gpm)

,0?

~o% .

DEPTHTO

WATER(feet)

/&$&_

to3lif)3Z

Ml

pH(standard

units)

3~7&3~7f3.7J

3- 7g

TEMP.

27.1,V7-Y3-1-1

3~}$

COND.(pmhos/cmor (jS/cm)

9f *y£^ _

/ * l_"* *r

13Sv£

LJ *f (_f A

PURGING 'ENDED AT: / "£5"

DISSOLVEDOXYGEN

(circle mg/L or"A saturation)

u £5

•tl

* (f

*'lj

TOTAL VOLUME i -^ -PURGED (gallons). / c/_S

TURBIDITY(NTUs)

*/-^

,10

-h

,fs

WELL CAPACITY (Gallons Per Foot): 0.75" = 0.02; 1" = 0.04;- 1.25" =0.06; 2" = 0.16; 3" = 0-37; 4" = 0.65; 5"= 1.02;TUBING INSIDE DIA. CAPACITY (GalJFL): 1/8' = 0.0006; 3M6' = 0.0014; 1/4- = 0.0026; 5/16" = 0.004; 3;8' = 0.008; 1/2'

SAftAPLING DATA

COLOR(describe)

/ISO^_-

<--

&T7&

ODOR(describe)

/iso\- .

r>

ss<=>

6" =1.47; 12" = 5.88= 0.010; 5/8" = 0.016

SAMPLED BY (PRINT) / AFFILIATION:

PUMP OR TUBING S) . - '.DEPTH IN WELL (feel): // /

RaD DECONTAMINATION: 'Y $> '

SAMPLE CONTAINERSPECIBCATION

SAMPLE IDCODE COKTAINERS

/

MATERIALCODE

W

SAh-IPLER(S) SIGNATURES:. ^-> / ^ SAMPLING , ,j _ _/

lZ'/14/)b<n4' INIT1ATEDAT: 1 1 $OSAf PLE PUMP p. Of TUBING -__FLOW RATE (mL per minut v " & O MATERIAL CODE: /

SnS^ntType: ^B***

VOLUME

25* m\-

-~. »m

SAMPLE PRESERVATION

PRESERVATIVEUSED

/f /t'03


" /V'*)-

FINALPH

DUPLICATE:

SAMPUNG . - .ENDED AT: /_$ 0 /

' Y @T)


METHOD

Sb./%

SAMPUNGEQUIPMENT

CODE

rffifi

REMARKS: ' • , . , . . _ '

MATERIAL CODES: AG = Amber Glass; CG = Clear GlassyC— PE = Polyethylene; PP = Polypropylene; S = Sillcone; T = Teflon; O = Other (Specify)

SAMPLWGJPURG1NG APP = After Peristaltic Pump; 8 = Bailer; BP = Bladder Pump; ESP = Electric Submersible Pump;EQUIPMENT CODES: RFPP = Reverse Row Peristaltic Pump; SM = Straw Method (Tubing Gravity Drain); VT = Vacuum Trap;


NOTES: 1. The above do not constitute all of thes information required by Chapter 62-160, F.A.C.2. STABILIZATION CRITERIA FOR RANGE OF VARIATION OF LAST THREE CONSECUTIVE READINGS (SEE FS 2212. SECTION 3)

pH: + 0.2 units Temperature: + 0^ °C Specific Conductance: + 5% Dissolved Oxygen: all readings < 20% saturaUon (see Table FS 220O-2);optionally, + 0.2 mgyL or + 10% (whichever is.grealer) Turbidity: all readings < 20 NTU; optionally ± 5 NTU or + 10% (whichever is greater)

oQ O RP R O P E R T Y S C I E N C E S GROUND WATER SAMPLING LOG

NAMESITELOCATION:

WELLNO:/ . SAMPLE ID: DATE: Y/ *>PURGING DATA

WELL rj*'

DIAMETER (inches):/

TUBING IJtjDIAMETER (inches): /"


DEPTH: 5^"Teel to/ <^ feet

WELL VOLUME PURGE: 1 WELL VOLUME = (TOTAL WELL DEPTH - STATIConly fill out f applicable) • = (

gallons

STATIC DEPTH PURGE PUMP TYPE v

TO WATER (feet):/£>c /( ' OR BAILER: f/£ A

DEPTH TO WATER) X WELL CAPACITYfeet- . feet) X gallons/fool =

EQUIPMENT VOLUME PURGE: 1 EQUIPMENT VOL. = PUMP VOLUME + (TUBING CAPACITY X TUBING LENGTH) •>- FLOW CELL VOLUME iO(only fill out if applicable) /•• -1 -if!\f /\ lA 0/t/ 7 •? "^ I ~? * ' /•

, _:> / ~ vt = £,u /"gallons* ( ^ 6 ' gallons/foot X ^ ? feet)+ t /_5 gallons = gallons^

INITIAL PUMP OR TUBING O — *^DEPTH IN WELL (feet): / ,5

TIME

/£*/£

/7//gr"tjtilr5^W

7^57


,75o ?5^5i


.75

FINAL PUMP OR TUBING '""1 ? *"DEPTH IN WELL (feet): f **

/.««/ ^5

PURGERATE(9pm)

,£$"

^,0^

DEPTHTO

WATER(feet)

Ht^yn«.G!z(3^

/y«/y

(standardunits)

3.%_7c%>3.7 7

3^

PURGING •_,,/- PURGING TOTAL VOLUME ,/ ~j ?INITIATED AT: /^/ J (e ENDED AT:/^^/ PURGED (gallons): /- <^^

TEMP.

^3fe*^fay

_2ffy_

COND.(jimhosfcmor pS/cm)

177^7J«-3ilLJtf^-

^75^

DISSOLVEDOXYGEN


iffl

t fa* ^«?

.£?i

.

TURBIDITY(NTUs)

* 70*7ofc /

,3S

COLOR(describe)

75^7—— -

~/£*t

ODOR(describe)

-0^

- "*

-<E?

WELL CAPACITY (Gallons Per Foot): 0.75" = 0.02; T = 0.04;. 1.25" = 0.06; 2" = 0.16; 3" = 0.37; 4" = 0.65; 5"= 1.02; 6"= 1.47; 12" = 5B8TUBING INSIDE DIA. CAPACITY (Gal./FL): 1«" = 0.0006; 3M6- = 0.0014; W = 0.0026; 5M6' = 0.004; 3;8' = 0.006; MZ" = 0.010; 5/8" = 0.01 6

SAMPLING DATASAMPLED BY (PRINT) /AFFILIATION: SAMPLER(S) SK5NATURES: • .

,#«. C, . » SAMPLING \ .../ SAMPLING , - .-x"6v^C^ C- / &fjM7~LCl*AsJ> INITIATEDAT: /0l.5*J ENDED AT: //.So

PUMP OR TUBING 7 7 ' -' SAMPLE PUMP ft - TUBING -T~<-DEPTH IN WELL (feet): ff ~* FLOW RATE (mL per minute): ' »fD MATERIAL CODE f,

RaD DECONTAMINATION: 'Y @> ^SfcS SS* Type: RLTERS1ZI

SAMPLE CONTAINERSPECIRCAT1ON

SAMPLE IDCODE CONTAINERS

~7*~MATERIAL

CODE/)/)

VOLUME

^&&/»L

5: • urn

SAMPLE PRESERVATION

PRESERVATIVEUSED

M/^3

TOTAL VOLADDED IN RELDJmL)

-/l/;

FINALPt)

.DUPLICATE: /?} N


METHOD

S'KPJ?

SAMPLINGEQUIPMENT

CODE

^r

REMARKS: \ / / . =:- .

MATERIAL CODES: AG = Amber Glass/ CG = Clear Glass>S — PE = Poryethylene; PP = Polypropylene; S = Sillcone; T = Teflon; O = Other (Specify)

SAMPLING/PURGING APP = After Peristaltic Pump; B = BaBer BP = Bladder Pump; ESP = Bectric Submersible Pump; PP = Peristaltic PumpEQUIPMENT CODES: RFPP = Reverse Row Peristaltic Pump; SM = Straw Method (Tubing Gravity Drain): VT = Vacuum Trap; O = Other (Specify)

NOTES: 1. The above do not constitute all of the information required by Chapter 62-160, F.A.C.2. STABILIZATION CRrrERiA FOR RANGE OF VARIATION OF LAST THREE CONSECUTIVE READINGS (SEE FS 221 2, SECTIONS)

pH: + 02 units Temperature: + 0.2 °C Specific Conductance: ± 5% Dissolved Oxygen: all readings f 20% saturation (see Table FS 2200-2);optionally, ± 0.2 mgfl- or ± 10% (whichever is greater) Turbidity: all readings < 20 NTU; optionally ± 5 MTU or +10% (whichever is greater)


TM

GROUND WATER SAMPLING LOG

£>( •£ 1 olNAME:SITELOCATION:

WELL NO: - tf SAMPLE ^•

PURGING DATAWELL -

DIAMETER (inches): /TUBING 'f fDIAMETER (inches): /y


DEPTH: /'y feet to / feet

WELL VOLUME PURGE: 1 WELL VOLUME = (TOTAL. WELL DEonly fill oulif applicable) t, Q ~Jv~gallons 7*IZt-u'C^ r / J ~ j \}Q

STATIC DEPTH (y ~,TO WATER (feet): V. O /

PURGE PUMP TYPE t

OR BAILER: /'(f /V

PTH - STATIC DEPTH TO WATER) X WELL CAPACITY= I , LJ fr- feet O- ~7 feet) - x // gallons/loot =/y.ec ^0 / ,ILf

EQUIPMENT VOLUME PURGE: 1 EQUIPMENT VOL. = PUMP VOLUME * (TUBING CAPACITY X TUBING LENGTH)* FLOW CELL VOLUME(only fill out if applicable)

= gallons *( gallons/foot X feet)+ gallons = gallons

INITIAL PUMP OR TUBING / 9 ^DEPTH IN WELL (feet): / ff-

TIME

375-7efifeo©ocl)3

&D& Ls

£>9>c?l

Ct,A

£>?f/^


/.GO

+ 25

' G&

<£5v25>

\fll*~

FINAL PUMP OR TUBING SDEPTH IN WELL (leel): / ^


/ c (SC

/c {r*^>

J,?Q

_/* 7^%-®o

PURGERATE(gpm)

c6^

ce^.op'

r0Sf

.00

DEPTHTO

WATER(feel)

%/sJ"/S9,/<r9,/5

^-/S

PH(standard

units)

r.r/jTc7^

r, 7<^T-^.f-^

£%%

PURGING ~j , *INITIATED AT: Of"-*

TEMP.

fa 72$ '-Vi)f &v)~ 0

Zf-V

?^

7$*y

COND.(jj mhos/cmor (jS/cm)

0l/&uS

^/7^S^/(P(A$

/^^?€>3v£

J&3u$

PURGING j. • (ÊNDED AT: £>)fD /

DISSOLVEDOXYGEN


/ * i i

3~ 3 x<2c YB^3 -So

7- Ztf

WELL CAPACITY (Gallons Per Footy. 0.75" = 0.02; l" = 0.04; 1.25" = 0.06; 2" = 0.16; 3" = 037; 4" = 0.65-TUBING INSIDE DIA. CAPACITY (Gal./Fl): 1/8" = 0.0006; 3/16" = 0.0014; 1/4" = 0.0026; 5/16" = 0.004; 3/B"

TOTAL VOLUME ^PURGED (gallons): £/< <?<S-!

TURBIDITY(NTUs)

3'?3J3. o

c?^^,y

A 7

COLOR(describe)

/t/^1

^^-

•--•

" —

~~

SS&

ODOR(describe)

x<^1 c" —

— —

-~

•-—

/Ô

5" =1.02; 6" = 1.47; 12" = 5.58= 0.005; 1/2" = 0.010; 5/8" = 0.016

SAMPLING DATASAMPLED BY (PRINT) / AFFILIATION:

(30£lrPUMP OR TUBING y -, ^^ !DB3™ IN WELL (feet): / fj.

RELD DECONTAMINATION: "Y ^


SAMPiEIDCODE

#CONTAINERS

/

MATERIALCODE

/v

SAMPLER(S) SIGNATURES:& SAMPLING ^

O-y^/tO^Û .1NITIATEDAT: &$ / SAMPLING iltENDED AT: OC/I

SAt PLE PUMP ^ <X TUBINGFLOW RATE (mL per minuted - & 0 MATERIAL CODE "/ _S"FIELD-FILTERED: Y j ) RLTERS1Z

VOLUME

et&nL

E:. pm

SAMPLE PRESERVATION

PRESERVATIVE• USED

/y^txo 3-


~ Sl/Sf

RNALPH

^

fDUPLICATE: Y (®> .


METHOD

•?£,./%

SAMPLINGEQUIPMENT

CODE

'tf'r/

REMARKS: ' , ..:. .

MATERIAL CODES: ' AG = Amber Glass; CG = Clear Glassy!£—PE = Polyethylene; PP = Polypropylene; S = Sillcone; T = Teflon: O = Other (Specify)

SAMPLING/PURGING APR = After Peristaltic Pump; B = Bailer, BP = Bladder Pump; ESP = Electric Submersible Pump;EQUIPMENT CODES: -RFPP = Reverse Flow Peristaltic Pump; SM = Straw Method (Tubing Gravity Drain): VT = Vacuum Trap:

PP = Peristaltic PumpO=. Other (Specify)

NOTES: 1. The above do not constitute all of th« information required by Chapter 62-160, F.A.C.

2. STABILIZATION CRITERIA FOR RANGE OF VARIATION OF LAST THREE CONSECUTIVE READINGS (SEE FS 2212. SECTION 3^pH: ± OJ2 units Temperature: ± 0^ °C Specific Conductance: ± 5% Dissolved Oxygen: all readings < 20% saturation (see Table FS 2200-2);optionally, + 0.2 mg/L or + 10% (whichever is greater) Turbidity, all readings < 20 MTU; optionally + 5 NTU or + 10% (whichever is greater)

I

Q O RP R O P E R T Y S C I E N C E S GROUND WATER SAMPLING LOG

NAME: JV$>( fn c+piGS^ f'&fl LOCATION: /t>+L*s)/Je^ /t- *

WELL NO: /? _ )

WELL «nDIAMETER (inches):.//

SAMPLE ID: U ,?_ / cite 6t<PURGING DATA

TUBING J/&SDIAMETER (inches): /0

WELL SCREEN INTERVALDEPTH//0 feet to <-/£) feet

STATIC DEPTH -/ . /TO WATER (feea> 7, P t/

DATE: ^

PURGE PUMP-OR BAILER: (

WELL VOLUME PURGE: 1 WELL VOLUME = (TOTAL WELL DEPTH - STATIC DEPTH TO WATER) X WELL CAPACITYonly fill out if applicable) = ( ///r) feet~ • feel) x

gallons // U

â^T^PE y f\

gallons/fool =

EQUIPMENT VOLUME PURGE: 1 EQUIPMENT VOL. = PUMP VOLUME + (TUBING CAPACITY X TUBING LENGTH) * FLOW CELL VOLUME *? Q

(only fill out if applicable) / r , i ^ vLU ., 7.L "^ , -, ' ^ '1,1 — / VCI = » gallons + ( ^j^fj / l gallons/foot X /£>£) feet)* ,() gallons = gallons

INITIAL PUMP OR TUBING . SDEPTH IN WELL (feet): /<&Q

TIME

ff)O/}

'/<?//

[®f ~l


/'fa

f <?5L2S

^p«/(t

FINAL PUMP OR TUBING ,/"DEPTH IN WEU. (feel): /£>£)


//*$

3.- ^7-75

PURGERATE(gpm)

.£.

.VI

-¥|

/r

DEPTHTO

WATER(fee.)

35- 3 A5TI3

5%Y0

(standardunits)

7-^7^5

/• *~o

7- 3%

PURGING /•INITIATED AT: /.(££) ^»

TEMP.

J.(j,-~l

zL-72h- 7

/?{£•'/

COND.(fjmhosfcm

tjf}-fa

ffl- l%3- H^

/&*'&

PURGING ,.ENDED AT: /(J/7

DISSOLVEDOXYGEN


An4<f(f.

r9o

, Yo

TOTAL VOLUME ^ ~7 ^PURGED (gallons): i /J>

TURBIDITY(NTUs)

7-5rt /

^X- * /

yv

7«?"

COLOR(describe)

.y^

.. —-••-

J&^

ODOR(describe)

fS\t/ '{^

• -

- ^"'

stsO

WELL CA ACITY (Gallons Per Fool): 0.75" = 0.02; 1" = 0.04; 1.25" = 0.06; 2" = 0.16; 3" = 0-37; 4" = 0.65; 5»=1.02; 6"=1.47; 12" = 5.88TUBING INSIDE DIA. CAPACITY (GaUFL>. 1/8" = 0.0006; 3/16'= 0.0014; 1/4' = 0.0026; 5/16' = 0.004; W = 0.006; 1/2' = 0.010; 5/8" = 0.016

SAMPLING DATASAMPLED BY (PRINT) /AFFILIATION: SAMPLER(S)SIGNATURES: •

Uj / r SAMPUNG SAMPUNGENDED AT: JQ ("7

POMP OR TUBING . / '. SAJ/IPLEPUMP ^y TUBING f> £DEFTH IN WELL (feel): (6f) FLOW RATE: (mL per minutes, < // MATERIAL CODE: f /C-^

/T> RELD-FILTERED: Y (M/ RLTERSIZlRELD DECONTAMINATION: ^ N RBtadon EoUomert TVHS^


SAMPLE IDCODE

#CONTAINERS

I

MATERIALCODE

ff

VOLUME

<?-5bwL

--. urn

SAMPLE PRESERVATION

PRESERVATIVEUSED

&-SS& t.

TOTAL VOLftDDED IN FIELD (mL)

'SSj-

FINALPH

^_

DUPLICATE: Y /p .

INTENDEDANALYSIS AND/OR. METHOD

^bsJJy

SAMPUNGEQUIPMENT

CODE

fc$j*

REMARKS: ' . , , : - . •

MATERIAL CODES: ' AG = Amber Glass; CG = Clear Glassvfi— PE = Polyethylene; PP = Polypropylene: S = Silicons; T = Teflon; O = Other (Specify)

SAMPLING/PURGING APP = After Peristaltic Pump; B = Bailer. BP = Bladder Pump: ESP = Bectric Submersible Pump;EQUIPMENT CODES: RFPP = Reverse Flow Peristaltic Pump; SM = Straw Method (Tubing Gravity Drain); VT = Vacuum Trap;

PP = Peristaltic Pump0 = Other (Specify)

t . NOTES: 1. The above do not constitute all of the information required by Chapter 62-160, FJV.C.2. STABILIZATION CRITERIA FOR RANGE OF VARIATION OF LAST THREE CONSECUTIVE READINGS (SEE FS 2212. SECTION y\

pH: ± 0.2 units Temperature: * OJ2 °C Specific Conductance: + 5% Dissolved Oxygen: all readings £ 20% saturation (see Table FS 2200-2);optionally, ± 0.2mg/Lor + 10% (whichever is.greater) Turbidity: all readings < 20 NTU; optionally ± 5 NTU or + 10% (whichever is greater)

APPENDIX B

ANTIMONY CONCENTRATION VS WATER ELEVATION PLOTS

I'll

QOz

74 -,

72 -

70 -

68c

_o^J303

£u] 660)•t~»

I

Well MW-1Antimony Concentration vs Water Elevation

'Si

62

60

Aug-01 Dec-01 Apr-02 Aug-02 Dec-02 Apr-03 Aug-03 Dec-03 Apr-04 Aug-04 Dec-04 Apr-05 Aug-05 Dec-05 Apr-06

Date

-r 0.20

-- 0.18

-- 0.16

-- 0.14 -O)

-- 0.12 .1*-•5+**

-f 0.10 §oo

I 0.08

0.06 <

-- 0.04

-- 0.02

0.00

- Water Level •Anitmony


76

Q

74 --

72 i

70 -

«c•° 68

IUJ

® oo13 66

64 -

-B-

a

a

& - -

62 --


Date

r 0.20

-- 0.18

-- 0.16

-- 0.14 -O)E

-- 0.12 o+-fJO

I 0.10 §coO

-f 0.08

- 0.06 <

-- 0.04

-- 0.02

0.00

• Water Level •Anitmony


73

72 -

71 -

Q 70 -

69 ^

ra

! 68 HOJi_o>

5 67-

66 -

65 --

y 0.2

-- 0.18

-- 0.16

"0.14=5,

-- 0.12 .25

•4-*

10.1 §ou

4- 0.08 co

-- 0.06 <

-- 0.04

-- 0.02

64


Date

0

1 - - Water Level -Antimony

Well MW-7AAntimony Concentration vs Water Elevation

0.30

60


Date

0.00

- - Water Level -Anitmony

"".ill


O

76

74

72 -

70 -

c= 68 4

01L.fl> ~«13 66

64

62 -

0.20

0.18

0.16

0.14 -U)E

0.12 .2

0.10 §ou

-• 0.08 =

0.06 <

-- 0.04

-- 0.02

60


Date

0.00

• Water Level •Anitmony

~rr


0.20

0.00Aug-01 Dec-01 Apr-02 Aug-02 Dec-02 Apr-03 Aug-03 Dec-03 Apr-04 Aug-04 Dec-04 Apr-05 Aug-05 Dec-05 Apr-06

Date

- - Water Level •Anitmony

WellMV\M1Antimony Concentration vs Water Elevation

74

Q

(5

o

10>

72 -

70 -

68 -

66

64 -

62 -

-ar

0.20

-- 0.18

-- 0.16

-- 0.14 -O)E

-- 0.12 .2•+"CO

•*-•

+ 0.10 §oo

-f 0.08 gE-i

+ 0.06 <

-- 0.04

-- 0.02

60

Aug-01 Dec-01 Apr-02 Aug-02 Dec-02 Apr-03 Aug-03 Dec-03 Apr-04 Aug-04 Dec-04 Apr-05 Aug-05 Dec-05 May-06

Date

0.00

« - - Water Level •Anitmony

WellMW-13Antimony Concentration vs Water Elevation

76 -

1 4 -

D

£ 70Z

c"~ CO .

iLU

•2 66 -15 DD

R4

62 -

Rn -

„

.••

»

Ti,

/\^ \.


Date

- • • - -Water Level — • — Anitmony

- 0.18

- 0.16

- n 1 ^1 ^Ô)E

- 0.12 .12

- 010 §coo

- 0.08 |E

"Z3

- 0.06 <

- 0.04

- 0.02

.uu

APPENDIX B

PUBLIC NOTICE

APPENDIX C

LISTING OF REPORTS REVIEWED

Listing of Reports Reviewed

1. Focused Baseline Human Health Risk Assessment, Normandy Park Apartments, TempleTerrace, Florida By: Hazardous Substance & Waste Management Research, Inc Tallahassee, Florida Date: April, 1999

2. Streamlined Remedial Investigation, Normandy Park Apartments, 11110 North 56th Street,Temple Terrace, Florida By: QORE Property Sciences 1211 Tech Boulevard, Suite 200 Tampa, Florida 33619 Date: June 30, 1999

3. Record of Decision, Summary of Remedial Alternative Selection for the Soil andGroundwater, Normandy Park Apartments, Temple Terrace, Hillsborough County, FloridaBy: United States Environmental Protection Agency Date: March 11, 2000

4. Remedial Design/Remedial Action Work Plan, Normandy Park Apartments, Temple Terrace,Florida for Gulf Coast Recycling, Inc. By: QORE Property Sciences 1211 Tech Boulevard, Suite 200 Tampa, Florida 33619 Date: February 13, 2001

5. Revised Sampling and Analysis Plan, Remedial Design Ground Water Sampling, NormandyPark Apartments, Tampa, Florida for Gulf Coast Recycling, Inc. By: QORE Property Sciences 1211 Tech Boulevard, Suite 200 Tampa, Florida 33619 Date: February 13, 2001

6. Remedial Action Construction Report, Normandy Park Apartments, Temple Terrace, Floridafor Gulf Coast Recycling, Inc. By: QORE Property Sciences 1211 Tech Boulevard, Suite 200 Tampa, Florida 33619 Date: January 25, 2002

7. October 2005 Sampling Event, Remedial Action Ground Water Sampling, Normandy ParkApartments, Tampa, Florida for Gulf Coast Recycling, Inc. By: QORE Property Sciences 1211 Tech Boulevard, Suite 200 Tampa, Florida 33619 Date: January 11, 2006

APPENDIX D

SITE INSPECTION FORM

OSWER No. 9355.7-03B-P

Please note that "O&M" is referred to throughout this checklist. At sites where Long-TermResponse Actions are in progress, O&M activities may be referred to as "system operations" sincethese sites are not considered to be in the O&M phase while being remediated under the Superfundprogram.

Five-Year Review Site Inspection Checklist (Template)

(Working document for site inspection. Information may be completed by hand and attached to theFive-Year Review report as supporting documentation of site status. "N/A" refers to "not applicable.")

I. SITE INFORMATION

Site name: A/ Date of inspection:

Location and Region: ; tfff,)t. , P {_ EPA IP:

Agency, office, or company leading the five-yearreview: £(?fl

Weather/temperature:

Remedy Includes: (Check all that apply)v^" Landfill cover/containment

Access controlsInstitutional controlsGroundwater pump and treatmentSurface water collection and treatmentOther

* Monitored natural attenuationGroundwater containmentVertical barrier walls

Attachments: Inspection team roster attached Site map attached

II. INTERVIEWS (Check all that apply)

1. O&M site manager.Name

Interviewed at site . at office by phone Phone no.Problems, suggestions; Report attached

Title Date

2. O&M staffName Title

Interviewed at site at office by phone Phone no.Problems, suggestions; Report attached

Date

D-7


3. Local regulatory authorities and response agencies (i.e., State and Tribal officesresponse office, police department, office of public health or environmental health,recorder of deeds, or other city and county offices, etc.) Fill in all that apply.

AgencyContact

Name Title DateProblems: suggestions; Report attached

AgencyContact

Name Title DateProblems: suggestions; Report attached

Agency * • • • . . . . . . . .

ContactName Title .Date/-,

Problems; suggestions; Report attached

i

AgencyContact

Name • Title ' 'DateProblems: suggestions:. Report attached

, emergencyzoning office,

Phone no.

Phone no.

..

.-•Phone no.

i

Phone no.

4. Other interviews (optional) Report attached.

D-8


1.

2.

3.

4.

5. .

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

III. ON-SITE DOCUMENTS &

O&M DocumentsO&M manualAs-built drawingsMaintenance logs

Remarks

Site-Specific Health and Safety PlanContingency plan/emergency response

Remarks

O&M and OSHA Training RecordsRemarks

Permits and Service AgreementsAir discharge permitEffluent dischargeWaste disposal, POTWOther permits

Remarks

RECORDS VERIFIED (Check all that apply)

Readily availableReadily availableReadily available

Readily availableplan Readily available

Readily available

Readily availableReadily availableReadily availableReadily available

Gas Generation Records Readily available Up toRemarks

Settlement Monument RecordsRemarks

Groundwater Monitoring RecordsRemarks Loca/Wcl. *\ r\e*r-t>^

Leachate Extraction RecordsRemarks

Discharge Compliance RecordsAirWater (effluent)

Remarks

Daily Access/Security LogsRemarks

' •

Readily available

^Readily available])

>

Readily available

Readily availableReadily available

Readily available

Up to date ( N/^>Up to date C! )Up to date ^JTTT^)

Up to date (S^xUp to date (_N/Ay

Up to date (N/A.J

*

Up to date CiJ— /Up to date t^jiOUp to date (1 5}Up to date (N7^7

date. ' /N/A^>

V -1

Up to date S~filR\

. \Up to date N/ALiferxrif

1

Up to date (7J/X'\

Up to date (ffi/A^)Up to date (N/&\

Up to date (N/A^)

D-9

OSWER No. 9355 7-03B-P

IV. O&M COSTS

1.

2.

O&M OrganizationState in-housePRP in-houseFederal Facility in-houseOther

Contractor for State(^Contractor forPR>}

Contractor foi1 Federal facili ty

O&M Cost RecordsReadily available Up to dateFunding mechanism/agreement in place

Orieinal O&M cost estimate Breakdown attached

Total annual cost by year for review period if available

From To Breakdown attached

3.

Date DateFrom To

Date DateFrom To

Date DateFrom To

Date DateFrom To .

Date Date

' Unanticipated or Unusually HighDescribe costs and reasons:

• . . • ;•

Total costBreakdown attached




Total cost

O&M Costs During Review Period "

. - . , . - ' . - . - . • . . . . ; : . . . . -

V, ACCESS AND INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS (Applicable} N/A

A.

1.

B.

1.

Fencing

Fencing damaged Location shown on site map Gates secured (N/A^Remarks

Other Access Restrictions

Signs and other security measures Location shown on site map 0^^Remarks

-• '

D-10

OSWERNo. 9355.7-03B-P

c.1.

2..

Institutional Controls (ICs)

Implementation and enforcementSite conditions imply ICs not properly implemented Yes NoSite conditions imply ICs not being fully enforced Yes No

Type of monitoring (e.g.. self-reporting, drive bv)FrequencyResponsible partv/agencv •Contact

Name Title Date

Reporting is up-to-date Yes NoReports are verified by the lead agency Yes No

Specific requirements in deed or decision documents have been met Yes NoViolations have been reported Yes NoOther problems or suggestions: Report attached

Adequacy .. ICs are adequate ICs are inadequateRemarks

_ •

N/A"N/A

Phone no.

N/AN/A

N/AN/A

N/A

'^General . . ' '^ ,' ' . ' • ' / . ' • • . ' .''/• _____ ' .

1.

2.

3.

Vandalism/trespassing Location shown on site map QNo vandalism evident^Remarks .

Land use changes on site QN/AJ)Remarks ^" -

Land use changes off site N/A -«, /) 1 ) ' l/iRemarks Pr^^.4^. Stô/ 4 C>T^ V^b/it Ki/Xi Co^5^

^tsf of -AU <.J<.

)

kJ*d

VI. GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS

A.

1.

^ >Roads /Applicable T~~) N/A

Roads damaged Location shown on site map . f Roads adequate JRemarks ^-~-_ ^^

N/A

D-ll


B.

A.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

Other Site Conditions

Rpmarlfc

VII. LANDFILL COVERS (^^XpplkablT^)

Landfill Surface

Settlement (Low spots) Location shown on site mapAreal extent DepthRemarks

Cracks Location shown on site mapLengths Widths Depths .Remarks Vi 4 1 q j~1 rp 0 o^s=r Cre~.C )<L$ »-NoJ-tO\ •

' )

Erosion Location shown on site mapAreal extent DepthRemarks

Holes Location shown on site mapAreal extent "-{ep^hRemarks J^\A> n*. ^ j 0 />*("/ / p t^f

' J

N/A

/Settlement not evident^

/Cracking not evident ^^

.^— —f ' . \I Erosion not evident \

Jt

J

(^ ^ ^~~~^.Holes not evident^

Vegetative Cover ( (Jrass/ Cover properly established No signs of stress^Trees/ShrubsXindiciite si^c-arnTlocations on a diagram)

Remarks

' ' " ' . . . • • , ' ' ' • . ' s^~ 'S .Alternative Cover (armored rock, concrete, etc.) f N/ARemarks Vibr-^

Bulges Location shown on site mapAreal extent HeightRemarks

> . ;".'' : - . . ' ' • ; . - •

_^^*~ *~^^^

/ 'Bulges not evident \V^^ — _ j — -^ ^

D-12

OSWER No. 9355 7-03B-P

8. Wet Areas/Water Damage C^_Wet areas/water damage not evident^)

9.

B.

1.

2...

-. M..

3...

C.

1.

2.

3.

Wet areas Location shdwrfoii site, map-Ponding Location shown on site mapSeeps Location shown on site mapSoft subgrade Location shown on site map

Remarks

Slope Instability Slides Location shown on site mapAreal extentRemarks

""Areal extentAreal extentAreal extentAreal extent

/""No evidence of slope i n s t a b i l i t y ^

Benches . Applicable Vjj/A^(Horizontally constructed mounds of earth placed across a steep landfill side slope to interrupt the slopein order to slow down the velocity of surface runoff and intercept and convey the runoff to a linedchannel.)

Flows Bypass Bench Location shown on site mapRemarks

Bench Breached Location shown on site mapRemarks

Bench Overtopped Location shown on site mapRemarks

/^N/A or okay )^-i*=~_ -^

.

(^N/AorotaT>

/N/A or okayx

Letdown Channels Applicable (~ N/A }(Channel lined with erosion controrrnatarfiprap, grout bags, or gabions that descend down the steepside slope of the cover and will allow the runoff water collected by the benches to move off of thelandfill cover without creating erosion gullies.)

Settlement Location shown on site map NoAreal extent DepthRemarks

Material Degradation Location shown on site map NoMaterial type Areal extentRemarks

Erosion Location shown on site map NoAreal extent DepthRemarks

evidence of settlement

evidence of degradation

evidence of erosion

D-13


4. Undercutting Location shown on site map No evidence of undercuttingAreal extent ; DepthRemarks.

5. Obstructions Type No obstructionsLocation shown on site map Areal extent

SizeRemarks ,

6. Excessive Vegetative Growth TypeNo evidence of excessive growthVegetation in channels does not obstruct flowLocation shown on site map Areal extent_

Remarks

D. Cover Penetrations Applicable f N./A J

1. Gas Vents' Active PassiveProperly secured/locked Functioning Routinely sampled Good conditionEvidence of leakage at penetration Needs MaintenanceN/A

Remarks

2. Gas Monitoring Probes ,• .... . Properly secured/locked Functioning .tRJiptinely sampled . -Good condition

Evidence of leakage at penetration .' Needs Maintenance N/ARemarks

3. . Monitoring Wells (within surface area of landfill)Properly secured/locked Functioning Routinely sampled Good conditionEvidence of leakage at penetration Needs Maintenance N/A

Remarks

4. Leachate Extraction WellsProperly secured/locked Functioning Routinely sampled Good conditionEvidence of leakage at penetration Needs Maintenance N/A

Remarks

5. Settlement Monuments Located Routinely surveyed N/ARemarks :

D-14


E

1

2.

3.

F

1.

2.

G

1

2.

3.

4.

. Gas Collection and Treatment

Gas Treatment FacilitiesFlaringGood condition

Remarks

Applicable (N/A^

Thermal destruction Collection for reuseNeeds Maintenance

Gas Collection Wells, Manifolds and PipingGood condition Needs Maintenance

Remarks

Gas Monitoring FacilitiesGood condition

Remarks

Cover Drainage Layer

Outlet Pipes InspectedRemarks

w-

Outlet Rock InspectedRemarks

,.„,..

(e.g., gas monitoring of adjacent homes or buildings)Needs Maintenance N/A

Applicable ^N/Ay

Functioning N/A

Functioning N/A

/'"'**.

^'Detention/Sedimentation Ponds Applicable N/A J».r.-

SiltationAreal extentSiltation not evident

Remarks

Depth N/A

Erosion Areal extent DenthErosion not evident

Remarks

Outlet WorksRemarks

DamRemarks

Functioning N/A

Functioning N/A

D-15


H

1.

2.

I.

1.

2.

3.

4.

. Retaining Walls Applicable V N/A A

Deformations Location shown on site map Deformation notHorizontal displacement Vertical displacementRotational displacementRemarks

Degradation Location shown on site map Degradation notRemarks

Perimeter Ditches/Off-Site Discharge Applicable (N/A \

Siltation Location shown on site map Siltation not evidentAreal extent DepthRemarks

Vegetative Growth Location shown on site map N/AVegetation does not impede flow

Areal extent TypeRemarks

evident

evident

Erosion Location shown on site map Erosion not evidentAreal extent DepthRemarks

' ,•

Discharge Structurt Functioning N/ARemarks

VIII. VERTICAL BARRIER WALLS Applicable ^/A^)

1.

2.

Settlement Location shown on site map Settlement not evidentAreal extent DepthRemarks

Performance MonitoringType of monitoringPerformance not monitored

Frequency Evidence of breachingHead differentialRemarks

D-16


A

1

2.

3.

B

1.

2

3

IX. GROUNDWATER/SURFACE WATER REMEDIES

. Croundwater Extraction Wells, Pumps, and Pipelines

Pumps, Wellhead Plumbing, and ElectricalGood condition All required wells properly operating

Remarks

Applicable N/A

Applicable (^/A)

Needs Maintenance N/A

Extraction System Pipelines, Valves, Valve Boxes, and Other AppurtenancesGood condition Needs Maintenance

Remarks

Spare Parts and EquipmentReadily available Good condition Requires upgrade

RemarksNeeds to be provided

. Surface Water Collection Structures, Pumps, and Pipelines Applicable ^N/Ay

Collection Structures, Pumps, and ElectricalGood condition Needs Maintenance

Remarks

Surface Water Collection System Pipelines, Valves, Valve Boxes,Good condition Needs Maintenance

;;" Remarks

Spare Parts and EquipmentReadily available Good condition Requires upgrade

Remarks

and Other Appurtenances

Needs to be provided

D-17

OSWERNo.9355.7-03B-P

C. Treatment System Applicable

1. Treatment Train (Check components that apply)Metals removal Oil/water separationAir stripping Carbon adsorbersFilters

Bioremediation

Additive (e.g., chelation agent, flocculent)_Others

, Good condition Needs MaintenanceSampling ports properly marked and functionalSampling/maintenance log displayed and up to dateEquipment properly identifiedQuantity of groundwater treated annuallyQuantity of surface water treated annually

Remarks

2. Electrical Enclosures and Panels (properly rated and functional)N/A Good condition Needs Maintenance

Remarks .

3. Tanks, Vaults, Storage VesselsN/A Good condition

RemarksProper secondary containment Needs Maintenance

4. Discharge Structure and AppurtenancesN/A Good condition

RemarksNeeds Maintenance

5. Treatment Building(s)N/A Good condition (esp. roof and doorways)Chemicals and equipment properly stored

Remarks

Needs repair

Monitoring Wells (pump and treatment remedy)Properly secured/locked Functioning Routinely sampledAll required wells located Needs Maintenance

Remarks

Good conditionN/A

D. Monitoring Data

1. Monitoring Dijta^»-~ -x^

S routinely submitted on tim£> Is of acceptable quality

2. Monilorinfi data suggests:Groundwater plume is effectively contaJnecT') Contaminant concentrations are declining

D-18.


D.

1.

Monitored Natural Attenuation

Mjmitflring W<*)K (natural

(Âll required wells locateKemarks

attenuation remedy) _ -^— — = -^•^ Functioning ^Routinely sampled^ C^Good condition^cT^> Needs Maintenance N/A

X. OTHER REMEDIES

If there are remedies applied at the site which are not covered above, attach an inspection sheet describingthe physical nature and condition of any facility associated with the remedy. An example would be soilvapor extraction.

XI. OVERALL OBSERVATIONS

A. Implementation of the Remedy

Describe issues and observations relating to whether the remedy is effective and functioning asdesigned. Begin with a brief statement of what the remedy is to accomplish (i.e., to contain contaminantplume, minimize infiltration and gas emission, etc.).

B.

:•

Adequacy of O&M

'_.i

, '4\1

Describe issues and observations related to the implementation and scope of O&M procedures. Inparticular, discuss their relationship to the current and long-term protectiveness of the remedy.

D-19.

APPENDIX E

INTERVIEW FORM

INTERVIEW FORMApartment Resident #1

1. Are you aware of the former environmental issues at the Apartments and of the cleanup actionsthat took place?

Yes, she was a resident at that time.

2. What is your overall impression of the cleanup project?

Based on her knowledge of the project, she thought if was very good.

3. What effects have this Site had on the surrounding community, if any?

None that she was aware of.

4. Are you aware of any community concerns regarding the Site?

Not at this time. She came to Tampa in 1992 but, at first, did not live at the apartments dueto the contamination. She later moved to Normandy Park about 8 years ago.

5. Do you feel well informed about the Site's activities and progress?

She felt well informed when the work was being done, but not since then.

6. Do you have any comments, suggestions, or recommendations regarding the cleanup workcompleted at the site and EPA's management of it?

None that she can think of.

INTERVIEW FORMApartment Resident #2


She was aware when the excavation was ongoing. She worked a lot so she was notintimately aware of what was going on. Her son knew more about it than she did.


She thought the site looked fine.


None of which she was aware.


None that she knows of; however, she doesn't get out much anymore to talk to very manyother people.


She was not really aware of what was going on or why; however, her son had kept abreastof what was going on.


No, she thought every thing was fine.

INTERVIEW FORM

Diane Lee - President, DIG Management ServicesAmy Flanagan - Property Manager (DIG) and Resident

(Interview was performed jointly)

1. Are you aware of the former environmental issues at the Apartments and of the cleanup actions

that took place?

Yes, DLG was managing the facility at the time of the cleanup. Amy has been living at thecomplex for three years and was not aware that contaminated soils remained on site. Shethought that the ground water monitoring that was being performed was to make certain thatthe contamination didn't come back. Neither was aware of the need to notify anyone if thesoil under the buildings, parking lot and so forth, was exposed or needed to be excavated.They had been providing notices to new and potential tenants about the site history but hadstopped several years ago; however, the complex has a very low turnover rate. Dianerequested a write-up of what was done and the restrictions on site to provide to hermaintenance personnel.


They thought it was very good.


They thought the work was a positive improvement.


Not that they were aware of.


Somewhat - they knew of the ground water monitoring but not the purpose for it and, asnoted above, they were unaware of the restrictions on the unexcavated soils; however, they

had not ever had any inquiries other than one person who had found it on a website (seeJoyce Morales-Caramella Interview Form).

6. Do you have any comments, suggestions, or recommendations regarding the cleanup work

completed at the site and EPA's management of it?

They couldn't think of anything.

INTERVIEW FORMDiana Colon - Leasing Agent (DLG) and Resident


She has lived at the complex for only about one year. She had heard about thecleanup/environmental issues in a peripheral way but otherwise did not know what wasdone.


She thought it was adequate.


She was not aware of any.


She had not heard of any concerns.


Yes, she felt well informed.


She was concerned about impacts to the water at the complex. Bill Denman explained thatthe complex was on City water and that the residents were not drinking or usingcontaminated water from the site. She was satisfied with this explanation.

INTERVIEW FORMFrankie Acuna - Maintenance Man (DLG)Victor Claudio - Maintenance Man (DLG)

(Interview was performed jointly)

1. Are you aware of the former environmental issues at the Apartments and of the cleanup actions

that took place?

Neither was aware of what had gone on at the site. Frankie had worked at the site for onlyabout 2 months and Victor had only been there a month. Neither was aware of therestrictions with respect to exposing or excavating the soil from under the sidewalks,pavement, buildings and so forth. Bill Denman and Joyce Morales-Caramella (GCR)explained what had occurred, what the restrictions were and why they were necessary.Both seemed to understand.

Due to their short timefrarne at the site and lack of site history, none of the remaining wereapplicable (NA).


NA


NA


NA


NA

6. Do you have any comments, suggestions, or recommendations regarding the cleanup work

completed at the site and EPA's management of it?

The areas of contaminated soil should be identified and procedures set up to notify futuremaintenance workers of the restrictions at the site.

NORMANDY PARK APARTMENTSFIRST FIVE-YEAR REVIEW

EPA Questions Asked of Joyce Morales-Caramelk - December 2005

1. What is your overall impression of the project?

The remediation project went well and was finished in a timely manner with very few problems.EPA, Gulf Coast Recycling, Inc. (OCR) and OCR's consultants worked well together.

2. How well do you believe the remedy is performing?

The remedy is performing as expected. Natural attenuation of groundwater is going to take moretime.

3. Have all institutional controls contained in the Record of Decision been implemented?If not, please provide a schedule for implementation.

No, the restrictive covenant is not yet in place. According to Bill Taylor, Mr. Green, theproperty owner, signed the covenant several months ago (shortly after meeting with Ms. West inAtlanta). The document was supposedly notarized and it was assumed it was sent to Ms. West.When recently questioned, Mr. Taylor's paralegal assistant stated the notarized document wassent to the corporate office for MetaJico, but no one can explain why. Metalico is looking for thedocument, but I'm not confident it will be found. I spoke with Mr. Taylor on Monday,December 12, 2005, and he stated that a new document would be signed, notarized and filed inHillsborough County before the end of 2005.

4. Has the maintenance of the monitoring wells and bard surfaces such as parking lots andsidewalks been implemented as intended? Please describe your role in the O&M of theremedy.

The wells are maintained by QORE on behalf of GCR. There have been no problems noted withthe flush-mount wells. The property owner maintains the sidewalks and other hard surfaces.QORE visits the property quarterly and I visit the property every three to four months.

5. Have you received any complaints or inquiries from residents of the Apartments sinceimplementation of the remedial action, regarding environmental issues or the remedialaction? If so, please explain,

Immediately upon completion of the remedial action complaints were received from residents ofthe complex regarding the elimination of the private decks in the southern complex.

There was a problem with stoimwater ponding in the northern complex shortly after the remedywas completed. WRS Infrastructure and Environment corrected the drainage problem.

One other complaint was forwarded to me from Bill Denman and the Environmental ProtectionCommission of Hillsborough County (EPC) that a resident was complaining of battery chips inthe complex. Bill Weston (the OCR Operations Manager) and I walked every inch of the siteand found a couple battery chips near the roots of one of the big oak trees in the northerncomplex, I spoke with the complainant and she stated that she had never told anyone that shehad seen battery chips, but rather she had reviewed historic data on line and was concerned aboutthe battery chips. Her concerns were diminished by the time I spoke with her since she wasmoving or had just moved. I explained the remediation that was done at the site and why.

6. Have there been unexpected O&M difficulties or costs at the site since start-up or in thelast five years? If so, please give details.

It just recently came to my attention that the paving stones surrounding one of the trees, west ofthe tennis courts, are being dislodged by some of the older children in the complex. I broughtthis to the attention of the apartment manager after the stones were put back in place. If thiscontinues, OCR will consider cementing the stones in place or replacing the stones with awooden deck.

7. Have there been opportunities to optimize O&M, or sampling efforts? Please describechanges and resultant or desired cost savings or improved efficiency.

There has been a reduction in the frequency of sampling and in the number of parameters beingsampled. Although additional wells were installed to properly assess the groundwater at thewestern property boundary, the number of parameters being analyzed at several other wells hasbeen reduced. Also, the sampling frequency of several wells was reduced from quarterly tosemiannuaUy. All changes were made after receiving EPA's approval.

8. Bo you have any comments, suggestions, or recommendations regarding the project?

If not already being done, persons leasing apartments at Normandy Park should be notified of theremedial action taken at the site and should be notified regarding precautions that should betaken, such as not digging on the property, reporting broken sidewalks, etc.

APPENDIX F

RESTRICTIVE COVENANT

EÊRGUSON & MCMULLEN

isoi SOUTH FLORIDA AVENUE

LAKELAND. FLORIDA 33303

teS3> S8O-99O0 FAX (863) 633-2349

ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW

ONE TAMPA CITY CENTER. SUITE 3OOO

2OI NORTH FRANKLIN STREET

P.O. BOX 1531 (ZIP 336OD

TAMPA. FLORIDA 336OH

(Si3) 273-4200 FAX 1813) 273-4396

www.mfmlegal.com

EMAIL.- in[o@mfm!egal.com

February 27, 2006

625 COURT STREET

P O. BOX 1669 (ZIP 337571

CLEARWATEP. FLORIDA 33756

1727) 441-8966 FAX 1737) 44Z-347O

IN REPLY REF-ER TO:

Tampa

Kathleen West, Esq.Associate Regional CounselEPA Region 4Atlanta Federal Center61 ForsythSt., SWAtlanta, GA 30303

Re: Normandy Park Superfund Site; 11110 N. 56'" Street, Temple Terrace, FloridaDeclaration of Restrictive and Affirmative Covenants

Dear Kathleen:

Enclosed please find a copy of the fully executed Declaration of Restrictive andAffirmative Covenants for the above referenced matter. I have, by copy of this letter, sent a fullyexecuted copy to Kelsey A. Helton at the Florida Department of Environmental Protection aswell.

Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.

WBTIV:kkbEnclosurec: Kelsy A. Helton

--Joyce Morales-CaramellaSteve Green

Sincerely,

WTT

INSTR # 2006068283O BK1 6094 PG 0022

RECORDED 02/08/2006 04:53:41 PMPflT FRflNK CLERK OF COURTHILLSBOROUGH COUNTYDEPUTY CLERK Y Roche

This instrument prepared by:William B. Taylor IV, Esquire

f J Macfarlane Ferguson & McMullen\) P.O. Box 1531

Tampa, Florida 33601

DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVEAND AFFIRMATIVE COVENANTS

This Declaration of Restrictive and Affirmative Covenants ("Declaration" or "thisinstrument") is given this °F* day of JAUUAey 2006, bya Fl_ corporation, ("Grantor"), having an address of \ \ \ \O h|» 54j"ft*S"raBgT TAfttfA, Pi —to the State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection ("Grantee"). 3 Ski "7

WITNESSETH:

2. WHEREAS, Grantor is the sole fee simple owner of a parcel of land located inthe county of Hillsborough, State of Florida, more particularly described on Exhibit Aattached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Property"); and

3. WHEREAS, the Property is part of the Normandy Park Superfund Site ("Site"),which the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA"), pursuant to Section 105 of theComprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA"),42 U.S.C. § 9605, proposed for the National Priorities List, set forth at 40 C.F.R. Part300, Appendix B, by publication in the Federal Register in February, 1995; and

4. WHEREAS, The Superfund Streamlined Remedial Investigation and FocusedFeasibility Study confirmed that soil was contaminated with lead, antimony and arsenic,and that groundwater is contaminated with lead and antimony in concentrations thatexceed standards or recommended exposure or ingestion levels; and

5. WHEREAS, in a Record of Decision dated May 11, 2000 (the "ROD"), the EPARegion 4 Regional Administrator selected a "remedial action" for the Site, whichprovides, in part, for the following actions:

• excavation of the top two feet of exposed soil around the apartmentcomplex

• removal of wooden deck in the southern complex and excavation beneath• treatment of excavated soil via stabilization and offsite disposal

placement of clean fill in excavated areas• monitored natural attenuation of groundwater• placement of institutional controls in the form of deed

restrictions/restrictive andaffirmative covenants to limit future use of soil and groundwater, ensuremaintenance of the engineered remedy, and authorize site access forcertain purposes; and

6. WHEREAS, with the exception of continued monitored natural attenuation ofthe groundwater, the remedial action has been implemented at the Site; and

7. WHEREAS, the parties hereto have agreed 1) to impose on the Property userestrictions as covenants that will run with the land for the purpose of protecting humanhealth and the environment; and 2) to grant an irrevocable right of access over theProperty to the Grantee and its agents or representatives for purposes of implementing,facilitating and monitoring the remedial action; and

8. WHEREAS, Grantor wishes to cooperate fully with EPA and the Grantee in theimplementation of all response actions at the Site and Grantor deems it desirable and inthe best interest of all present and future owners of the Property that such remediationproceed and that the Property be held subject to certain irrevocable restrictions andlicenses, all of which are more particularly hereinafter set forth;

NOW, THEREFORE:

9. Grant: Grantor, on behalf of itself, its successors and assigns, in consideration ofthe recitals above, the terms of the Consent Decree in the case of the United States y..Gulf Coast Recycling. Inc.. Civil Action # 8:01-CIV-1191-T-24TBM, and other good andvaluable consideration, the adequacy and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, doeshereby covenant and declare that the Property shall be subject to the restrictions on useset forth below, and does give, grant and convey to the Grantee, and its assigns, withgeneral warranties of title, 1) an irrevocable use restriction and site access covenant ofthe nature and character, and for the purposes hereinafter set forth and 2), the perpetualright to enforce said covenants and use restrictions, with respect to the Property.

10. Purpose: It is the purpose of this instrument to convey to the Grantee rights to

facilitate the remediation of past environmental contamination and to protect humanhealth and the environment by reducing the risk of exposure to contaminants. Thecovenants, terms, conditions, restrictions and grants contained herein shall touch andconcern the Property; shall run with the land; shall apply to and be binding upon andinure to the benefit of Grantor and Grantee, their successors and assigns; and shallcontinue as a servitude running in perpetuity with the Property and with title to theProperty.

11. Restrictions on use: The following covenants, conditions, and restrictions apply tothe use of the Property:

The owner of the property shall notify EPA and Grantee prior to the disturbance ofany existing structures_ more particularly described on Exhibit B attached heretoand made a part hereof. These structures include but are not.limited to concretebuilding foundations and asphalt parking lots. with the notification, the propertyowner shall also submit a plan for EPA and Grantee approval which addressesthe soil underneath these structures consistent with the requirements of the RODfor the Site. The existing structures shall not be disturbed until EPA and Granteehave provided written approval of a plan for addressing the potentiallycontaminated soil underneath.

The owner of the Property will not construct any groundwater wells onthe Property or use the groundwater for any purpose without receiving written

prior approval from EPA and Grantee.

The owner of the Property shall maintain all asphalt byways and parking lots so asto ensure their protective purpose as a capping remedial measure consistent withthe requirements of the ROD for the Site.

12. Irrevocable Covenant for Site Access: Grantor hereby grants to the Grantee, itsagents and representatives, an irrevocable, permanent and continuing right of access at allreasonable times to the Property for purposes of:

a) Implementing the response actions in the ROD;

b) Verifying any data or information submitted to EPA and Grantee;

c) Verifying that no action is being taken on the Property in violation of theterms of this instrument or of any federal or state environmental laws orregulations;

d) Monitoring response actions on the Site and conducting investigationsrelating to contamination on or near the Site, including, without limitation,sampling of air, water, sediments, soils, and specifically, without limitation,obtaining split or duplicate samples;

e) Conducting periodic reviews of the remedial action, including but not limitedto, reviews required by applicable statutes and/or regulations; and

f) Implementing additional or new response actions if the Grantee, in its solediscretion, determines i) that such actions are necessary to protect theenvironment because either the original remedial action has proven to beineffective or because new technology has been developed which willaccomplish the purposes of the remedial action in a significantly moreefficient or cost effective manner; and, ii) that the additional or new responseactions will not impose any significantly greater burden on the Property orunduly interfere with the then existing uses of the Property.

13. Modification: The above restrictions and covenants may be modified, orterminated in whole or in part, in writing, by the Grantee, executed by Grantee inrecordable form, and such writing shall be recorded by Grantor.

14. (a) Reserved rights of Grantor: Grantor hereby reserves unto itself, itssuccessors, and assigns, all rights and privileges in and to the use of the Propertywhich are not incompatible with the restrictions, rights and covenants granted herein.

(b) Reserved Rights of EPA: Nothing in this document shall limit or otherwiseaffect EPA's rights of entry and access or EPA's authority to take response actionsunder CERCLA, the NCP, or other federal law.

(c) Reserved Rights of Grantee: Nothing in this document shall limit or otherwiseaffect Grantee's rights of entry and access or authority to act under state or federal law.

15. Liability. Grantor shall take responsibility.for any costs or liabilities related to theoperation, upkeep or maintenance of the Property. Grantor will assume all liability for anyinjury or damage to the person or property of third parties which may occur on theProperty arising from Grantor's ownership of the Property. Neither Grantor nor anyperson or entity claiming by or through Grantor shall hold Grantee liable for any damageor injury to person or personal property which may occur on the Property. Grantor shallpay any and all real property taxes and assessments levied by competent authority onthe Property.

15. No Public Access and Use: No right of access or use by the general public toany portion of the Property is conveyed by this instrument.

17. Notice requirement: Grantor agrees to include in any instrument conveying anyinterest in any portion of the Property, including but not limited to deeds, leases andmortgages, a notice which is in substantially the following form:

N O T I C E : THE I N T E R E S T C O N V E Y E D H E R E B Y IS

SUBJECT TO A DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE ANDAFFIRMATIVE COVENANTS, DATED2004, RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC LAND RECORDS ON

, 20 , IN BOOK , PAGE , , INFAVOR OF, AND ENFORCEABLE BY, THE STATE OFFLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTION.

'Within thirty (30) days of the date any such instrument of conveyance is executed,Grantor must provide Grantee with a certified true copy of said instrument and, if it hasbeen recorded in the public land records, its recording reference.

18. Administrative Jurisdiction: The state agency having administrativejurisdiction over the interests acquired by the State of Florida by this instrument is theGrantee. EPA is a third party beneficiary to the interests acquired by the Grantee underthis instrument.

19. Enforcement: The Grantee shall be entitled to enforce the terms of thisinstrument by resort to specific performance or legal process. All remedies availablehereunder shall be in addition to any and all other remedies at law or in equity, includingCERCLA. Enforcement of the terms of this instrument shall be at the discretion of theGrantee, and any forbearance, delay or omission to exercise its rights under thisinstrument in the event of a breach of any term of this instrument shall not be deemed tobe a waiver by the Grantee of such term or of any subsequent breach of the same or anyother term, or of any of the rights of the Grantee under this instrument.

20. Damages: Grantee shall be entitled to recover damages for violations ofthe terms of this instrument, or for any injury to the remedial action, to the public or tothe environment protected by this instrument.

21. Waiver of certain defenses: Grantor hereby waives any defense oflaches, estoppel, or prescription.

22. Covenants: Grantor hereby covenants to and with the Grantee, that theGrantor is lawfully seized in fee simple of the Property, that the Grantor has a good andlawful right and power to sell and convey it or any interest therein, that the Property is freeand clear of encumbrances, except those noted on Exhibit C attached hereto, and thatthe Grantor will forever warrant and defend the title thereto and the quiet possessionthereof.

23. Notices: Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, or communicationthat either party desires or is required to give to the other shall be in writing and shalleither be served personally or sent by first class mail, postage prepaid,_ referencing theSite

name and Site ID # 04XB, and addressed as follows:

To Grantor: To Grantee:

SJOfcrnfrtsiOV PftgK, HobnES Bureau Chief, Waste Cleanupuuo to.sb-™ STREET FDEP M.S. 4505

260° Blair Stone RoadTallahassee, FL 32399

To EPA:

U.S. EPA, Region 4Waste Management DivisionSuperfund Remedial arid Technical Services BranchSection Chief, Section D61 Forsyth Street, SWAtlanta, GA 30303

24. Recording in Land Records. Grantor shall record this Declaration of Restrictiveand Affirmative Covenants in timely fashion in the Official Records of HillsboroughCounty, Florida, and shall rerecord it at any time Grantee may require to preserve itsrights. Grantor shall pay all recording costs and taxes necessary to record this documentin the public records.

25. General provisions:

a) Controlling law: The interpretation and performance of this instrument shallbe governed by the laws of the United States or, if there are no applicable federal laws,by the law of the state where the Property is located.

b) Liberal construction: Any general rule of construction to the contrarynotwithstanding, this instrument shall be liberally construed in favor of the grant to effectthe purpose of this instrument and the policy and purpose of CERCLA. If any provision ofthis instrument is found to be ambiguous, an interpretation consistent with the purpose ofthis instrument that would render the provision valid shall be favored over anyinterpretation that would render it invalid.

c) Severabilitv: If any provision of this instrument, or the application of it toany person or circumstance, is found to be invalid, the remainder of the provisions of thisinstrument, or the application of such provisions to persons or circumstances other thanthose to which it is found to be invalid, as the case may be, shall not be affected thereby.

d) Entire Agreement: This instrument sets forth the entire agreement of theparties with respect to rights and restrictions created hereby, and supersedes all prior

discussions, negotiations, understandings, or agreements relating thereto, all of which aremerged herein.

e) No Forfeiture: Nothing contained herein will result in a forfeiture orreversion of Grantor's title in any respect.

•Q Joint Obligation: If there? are two or more parties identified as Grantor herein, theobligations imposed by this instrument upon them shall be joint and several.

g) Successors: The term "Grantor", wherever used herein, and any pronouns usedin place thereof, shall include the persons and/or entities named at the beginning of thisdocument, identified as "Grantor" and their personal representatives, heirs, successors, andassigns. The term "Grantee", wherever used herein, and any pronouns used in place thereof,shall include the persons and/or entities named at the beginning of this document, identified as"Grantee" and their personal representatives, heirs, successors, and assigns. The rights of theGrantee and Grantor under this instrument are freely assignable, subject to the noticeprovisions hereof.

h) Termination of Rights and Obligations: A party's rights and obligations under thisinstrument terminate upon transfer of the party's interest in the Property, except that liability foracts or omissions occurring prior to transfer shall survive transfer.

i) Captions: The captions in this instrument have been inserted solely forconvenience of reference and are not a part of this instrument and shall have no effect uponconstruction or interpretation.

j) Counterparts: The parties may execute this instrument in two or morecounterparts, which shall, in the aggregate, be signed by both parties; each counterpart shallbe deemed an original instrument as against any party who has signed it. In the event of anydisparity between the counterparts produced, the recorded counterpart shall be controlling.

k) Nothing contained in this agreement shall preclude or in any other way hinderthe sale and/or conversion of the property to condominiums.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has caused this Agreement to be signed in its name.

Executed this °f^ day of <J ftMOACy. 2006.

[full mailing address of Grantor]

the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument tobe free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes thereinmentioned, and on oath stated that they are authorized to execute said instrument.

Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year written above.

JOHN M. MURRAYNotary Public, State of New YorH

No.4618009Qualified In Westchester Coun

Commission Expires May 31

otary Public in and for the ^4âte of (J

My Commission Expires:,

Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: (two witnesses required)

1-9-Ob

Witness Print Name Date

This Declaration is accepted this day oi_

Attachments:

2006.

STAljE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENTOF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

Exhibit AExhibit BExhibit C

Legal Description of the PropertyExisting Structures on the PropertyExisting Liens and Encumbrances on theProperty

FRGt'l -:N£TflLICO FflX NO. :9034971097 Jan. 11 2006 B3:30PI1 P2

A

All ofLots B, C, D, E, F, G, H and J Block 23, and. Lois B, C, D ajid E, Block 24, Less the East114 feet thereof for ihe-r ighi of way for State Rnad No. S-5S3 (5l!l Street) in Section 15,Township 28 Souih, Range ]9 East, Temple Tcrracs Subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book 25,Page 62, of the public records of iiillsborough County, Florida.

$030431.1

ES/cB 39Wd 1SWOO B6ES2G9ET8


Q O R E SITE LAYOUTP R O P E R T Y S C I E N C E S

1211 Tach Blvd. SUM6200 Tompa floildo 33619 (813)623

E0/E0 39tfd

.Page J ol '2.

MacFarlane Ferguson & McMullen201 N. Franklin Street Suite 2000 One Tampa City Center

Tampa FL 33602(813)273-4200

FAX: (813) 273-4396

Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation

OWNERSHIP AND ENCUMBRANCE REPORT

Order No: 40309797LA

Customer Reference No: 4352-6

This will serve to certify that Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation has caused to be made a search of the PublicRecords of Hillsborough County, Florida, ("Public Records") as contained in the office of the Clerk of the CircuitCourt of said County, from December 21, 1999 through January 24, 2006, at 8:00 a.m., as to the followingdescribed real property lying and being in the aforesaid County, to-wit:

Parcel 1:

Lot J, Block 23 of Temple Terraces in Section 15, Township 28 South, Range 19 East, as per map or plat thereof,recorded in Plat Book 25, Page 62, of the Public Records of Hillsborough County, Florida.

Parcel 2:

All of Lots B, C, D, E, F, G and H, Block 23, and Lots B, C, D and E, Block 24, Less the East 114 feet thereof, forthe right of way for State Road No. S0583 (56th Street) in Section 15, Township 28 South, Range 18 East,Temple Terraces, as per map or plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 25, Page 62, of the Public Records ofHillsborough County, Florida.

As of the effective date of this Report the apparent record fee simple title owner(s) to the above described realproperty is/are:

Normandy Park Holdings, Inc., a Florida corporation, by virtue of Warranty Deed recorded in Official RecordsBook 9980, Page 411.

The following liens against the said real property recorded in the aforesaid Public Records have been found:

1. UCC Financing Statement recorded in Official Records Book 11353, Page 61, as assigned in OfficialRecords Book 12021, Page 778. (as to Parcel 2)

2. Mortgage and Security Agreement recorded in Official Records Book 11387, Page 591, as assigned inOfficial Records Book 12525, Page 1279. (as to Parcel 2)

3. Assignment of Leases and Rents recorded in Official Records Book 11387, Page 653. (as to Parcel 2)

4. Mortgage and Security Agreement recorded in Official Records Book 11697, Page 1132, as modified inOfficial Records Book 12427, Page 1515 and assigned in Official Records Book 15683, Page 1659. (as toParcel 2)

5. UCC Financing Statement recorded in Official Records Book 11697, Page 1144. (as to Parcel 2)

6. UCC Financing Statement recorded in Official Records Book 11697, Page 1148. (as to Parcel 2)

7. Exparte Default Judgment Against Defendent recorded in Official Records Book 14298,recorded and certified in Official Records Book 14348, Page 1767.

http://wflorida.titlewave.net:8080/CommitmentDisplay.asp?FolderNum=2442841&D

Page 2 of 2

8. Claim of Lien recorded in Official Records Book 14051, Page 290.

9. Notice of Lis Pendens recorded in Official Records Book 14354, Page 1309.

10. Final Summary Judgment of Forclosure and Order Taxing Costs and Attorney's Fees recorded in OfficialRecords Book 15480, Page 1605.

11. Order Cancelling Foreclosure Sale recorded in Official Records Book 15607, Page 57 and Official RecordsBook 15664, Page 745.

NOTE: The 2005 Ad Valorem Taxes under Folio Number 200711-0000 were EXEMPT, (as to Parcel 1)

NOTE: The 2005 Ad Valorem Taxes under Folio Number 200709-0000 were PAID and the 2004 AdValorem Taxes for said Folio remain UNPAID, (as to parcel 2)

Public Records shall be defined herein as those records currently established under the Florida Statutes for thepurpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and withoutknowledge.

This Report shows only matters disclosed in the aforesaid Public Records, and it does not purport to insure orguarantee the validity or sufficiency of any documents noted herein; nor have the contents of any such documentsbeen examined for references to other liens or encumbrances. This Report is not to be construed as an opinion,warranty, or guarantee of title, or as a title insurance policy; and its effective date shall be the date abovespecified through which the Public Records were searched. This Report is being provided for the use and benefitof the Certified Party only, and it may not be used or relied upon by any other party. This Report may not be usedby a Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation agent for the purpose of issuing a Lawyers Title Insurance Corporationtitle insurance commitment or policy.

In accordance with Florida Statutes Section 627.7843 the liability Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation maysustain for providing incorrect information in this Report shall be the actual loss or damage of the Certified Partynamed above up to a maximum amount of $1,000.00.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation has caused this Report to be issued inaccordance with its By-Laws.

Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation

M

http://wflorida.titlewave.net:8080/CommitmentDisplay.asp?FolderNum=2442841&DocNu... 2/7/2006

APPENDIX G

SOIL SAMPLING RESULTS TREE PRESERVATION AREAS

APPENDIX H

LEAD AND ANTIMONY CONCENTRATION CHARTS

Chart 1

o

cCDooo•orao>

<s>

Date of Sampling

•MW-1 • MW-7A

Chart 2

0.35

roE

oE

oc

0.25

.2 0.15

c0)ucoo

0.05

^

C?'

Date of Sampling

--MW-11 —•—MW-7A

APPENDIX I

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN MARCH 2006