12
FITNESS FOR PURPOSE POL L RE SULTS AN D ON L INE S URVEY DATA COM BINE D

Fitness for purpose, and Testing

  • Upload
    aranr

  • View
    147

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Fitness for purpose, and Testing

FITNESS F

OR PURPO

SE

PO

L L RE

SU

LTS

AN

D O

NL I N

E S

UR

VE

Y D

AT A

CO

MB

I NE

D

Page 2: Fitness for purpose, and Testing

PEOPLE WHO TOOK PART IN THE VIDEOSample Data of poll-takers: 12

Sample Data of online survey takers: 4

Names:

Tanya Sethi

Simran Makhiji

Suman Uttamchandani

Nicolle Chen

Clare Coverdale

Zahra Beg

Katherine Chu

Kelly Yip

Sharmaine Cheung

Julia D’Rozario

Jamie Lee

Yee Jeung Yuen

Important Note:-The feedback I have included in each question/slide is only a portion of the total amount; I only chose the best, most useful and in depth additional comments and feedback.

-The anonymous names are answers people had provided from Survey Monkey.

Page 3: Fitness for purpose, and Testing

As you can see, the majority of the clients I am testing on are planning on taking Economics next year. Because of this, their feedback will be incredibly important, as they are the targeted audience.

ARE YOU PLANNING ON TAKING ECONOMICS NEXT YEAR?

Sales

YesNoMaybe

Page 4: Fitness for purpose, and Testing

Sales

YesNo

8 out of 12 people said this video was informative. I think this is a reasonably good, considering the fact that quite a few of them already take Economics, and already understand Supply of Economics.

Conclusion: Overall, my clients did find it informative, one of my main goals in creating this video. However, there were one or two clients that were not satisfied with the information given, as they already knew all the basics because of how they take Economics as a subject already. This becomes complicated, as it is extremely difficult to bring in new information to experienced students, while not overcomplicating things for students that have never sat in a class of Economics before. However, the students that I had interviewed who already currently take Economics was useful as they gave me an indication whether I matched and covered the syllabus of Edexcel Economics sufficiently.

Sample of External feedback:

Tanya: I think you should explain more on the graph section of Supply, I got confused a bit there.

Nicolle: I am not going to take Economics next year, but I did learn a lot about Supply!

Suman: This covered more on Supply than what I learnt in Business, so I think it was helpful.

Jamie: I already take Economics, so I already know the things you talked about in the video. You covered Supply well and the syllabus as well..

Anonymous: I think it was easy to understand. you explained it well with simple language.

Anonymous: I think this will be good for people that don’t take Economics, but I didn’t really learn much because I already take Economics and know the things you mentioned in the video.

DO YOU THINK THIS VIDEO WAS INFORMATIVE?

Page 5: Fitness for purpose, and Testing

Sales

YesNoTo an Extent

More than half of the clients said the video is visually effective, or to an extent.

Conclusion: Based on the feedback, I think I need to work and develop my video to become more interesting and entertaining. I understood that my introduction was a strong point in terms of visual effectiveness.

Sample of External Feedback:

Julia: I really liked the introduction bit, and I like how the pictures went with the audio

Tanya: It was good, but it became a tiny bit boring because all you did after the introduction was just talk.

Nicolle: I think it was good, the cloning was really cool!

Anonymous: I think you could improve it more? But there were lot’s of different kinds of shots so it was pretty visually entertaining.

Anonymous: I think it could’ve been better, like add more pictures. I think there’s too much of you talking in front of the camera.

Anonymous: After the introduction, the video became a bit boring and repetitive! It might discourage audience from watching, and it’s hard to learn if it’s not stimulating! I thin you need to wok more on making it more entertaining and visual.

DO YOU THINK THIS VIDEO WAS VISUALLY EFFECTIVE?

Page 6: Fitness for purpose, and Testing

The feedback for the quality of shots in general were generally good.

Conclusion: Overall, the feedback on the shots were positive. The main criticism was the slight shakiness I had in two of the camera I used.

Additional Comments:

Simran: I think they were good! Some shots were a bit shakey but otherwise really good!

Sharmaine: They were good and you had like different kinds of shots so it looked more professional.

Jamie: I liked how you used a tripod, but for the other camera you should've used it as well!

Anonymous: It could be better, some were not proportioned, for example in one shot, you were too much to the left.

Anonymous: Sometimes the shots changed too much in such a period of time, it can look a bit messy and confusing but overall I think it was good! One of the cameras is really stable.

RATE THE QUALITY OF SHOTS IN GENERAL(1 WORST – 5 BEST):

1 2 3 4 50

1

2

3

4

5

6

Number of People

Number of Peo-ple

Page 7: Fitness for purpose, and Testing

Sales

YesNo

A satisfying majority of people said that the video displayed good ICT Technical Skills.

Conclusion: I think I did well in terms of incorporating ICT technical skills into my video. There were some suggestions that I needed more in the body of the video, after the introduction.

Sample of External Feedback:

Katherine: I think your ICT skills in the video were really good. The cloning was impressive!

Kelly: I think you could have added more to be honest, there were a few good ones but you need more!

Simran: I’m also doing a video, and I know how hard it is to sync the audio and the video together. You also had like lots of different camera angles which I didn’t do, that looks hard and good!

Zahra:I think you did pretty good especially when you don’t do filming studies! I guess you could add more animations and stuff.

Sharmaine: I think it did. Especially the introduction, that was very technical.

Clare: It was good, but to get a high level I think you need to add more. Maybe animations or like video clips or something? I was good though!

Anonymous: I think you should’ve added more, there were a few very good ones, but I think you need to add more virtual animations! That will make the video more interesting and better.

DO YOU THINK THIS VIDEO PORTRAYS A GOOD RANGE OF ICT TECHNICAL SKILLS?

Page 8: Fitness for purpose, and Testing

Sales

Shot 1 Shot 2Shot 3

Shot 1 was a middle, frontal shot.

Shot 2 was a low angled shot.

Shot 3 was a high side shot.

*I showed them each shot before asking this question

Conclusion: I have learnt that using a tripod for shot 1 was effective, as it garnered good feedback. The most popular shot was in fact shot 3, mostly because of how it was from an interesting angle, and that it had the best colour. I understood that, despite having a tripod, shot 1 was the least popular, mostly because of the inferior colour it had compared to the other shots. Perhaps I could have used a colour enhancer on the videos that had the ‘dull’ feel.

Julia: I liked the shot where it was done from the side? It was good! The colour was the best there too.

Yee Jeung: The Shot where it was in front of you, it was really stable! Your other two videos was a bit shakey, but not that much.

Jamie: I liked all because they were all different! But if I had to choose, it would be shot 2 because it had a different perspective than the other videos.

Clare: One of the shots were not that stable, I think it was the third one. I think you should have used a tripod for that.

Anonymous: I think Shot 2 and 3 were better, because the quality and colour was better. The first shot was okay, it looked a bit dull.

WHICH SHOT DO YOU THINK WAS THE MOST EFFECTIVE?

Page 9: Fitness for purpose, and Testing

1 2 3 4 50

1

2

3

4

5

6

Number of People

Number of Peo-ple

Conclusion: The ratings of the quality of editing performed better than the ratings of the shots. The multi-camera synchronization and the different shots that were incorporated in the video may have been a strong factor of this.

Additional Comments

Zahra: I liked how you edited in a lot of different kind of shots with one audio! It gave it a clean finish.

Julia: I think the editing was good, especially the introduction!

Katherine: I thought it was pretty good. Sometime the cameras changed a bit too much but other than that it was good.

Nicolle: The part where you changed the photos in sync with the music at the introduction was really good! The rest of your video had good editing too.

Anonymous: I think you could’ve improved more on editing the video as good as you did with the cloning. Maybe you could have done a split screen when you started drawing the board?

RATE THE QUALITY OF EDITING (1 BEST - 5 WORST):

Page 10: Fitness for purpose, and Testing

Fact

ors th

at a

ffect S

uppl

y

Supp

ly&Dem

and

Conne

ctio

n0

1

2

3

4

5

6

No. of People

No. of People

According to the results factors that influence supply was the most informative and useful part of the video. This topic was the main body of the video, and is the topic where I spent the most time explaining.

Yee Jeung: The factors of supply you were mentioning were very informative! Maybe give an example with each factor? But maybe that would have been too long.

Along with the factors, I did spend a lot of time discussing, and explaining the nature of the graph, and what each factors changed in the Supply line.

Zahra: The graph bit of the video was good, it was a bit confusing though. The drawing of the graph really helped too!

Katherine: I learnt the most about the graph, as I already knew most of the other topics you covered.

The characteristics of a market, such as the equilibrium, did reasonably well in terms of the usefulness to the audience.

Tanya: I think the part where you talked about the equilibrium was simple, but informative.

Yee Jeung: You explained the characteristics of the market well, but I think it could have had more explanation to it!

The connection between supply and demand, and how they can affect each other garnered the least amount of votes. The reason to this might be because I had spent the least time on it.

NAME TWO AREAS OF THE VIDEO THAT YOU THOUGHT WAS THE MOST BENEFICIAL AND INFORMATIVE TO YOU.

Page 11: Fitness for purpose, and Testing

Number of People

YesNo

Conclusion: The majority of students said that the video would not affect their options in choosing Economics as an IB subject next year. Only one person, Tanya, said that it would affect her decision, however, she was already thinking of taking Economics instead of Geography.

Also, because of how the options for next year were already set and done, most of the students who took part in this test were sure of what they were taking, whether it was Economics or not, and this video did not change their views on it.

WILL THIS AFFECT YOUR DECISION IN TAKING ECONOMICS AS AN OPTION NEXT YEAR?

Page 12: Fitness for purpose, and Testing

Sharmaine: I think you should have removed the pin thing behind you on the wall, or choose another background. It was quite distracting and out of place.

Yee Jeung: You should include more pictures and graphs when you are talking!

Kelly: More animations during the tutorial and lecture bit!

Katherine: Engage the audience more, like maybe ask more questions and have interviews. Also put some jokes in to make it funny

Nicolle: I liked the example at the end, you should have more of those in the video.

Suman: I wanted to know more about Demand, or the price elasticity because that’s what I’m struggling at, my Economics topic in Business!

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AND INFORMATION