Upload
herbert-garrant
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
FISCAL POLICY
THE PRESIDENT AND CONGRESS USING TAXES AND SPENDING IN THE U.S. BUDGET TO INFLUENCE THE PATH OF THE ECONOMY
FATHER OF FISCAL POLICY: KEYNES
PRIOR TO KEYNES: RECESSIONS ARE SELF-CORRECTING
PRICES AND WAGES WILL , IN THE LONG RUN, FALL, AND THIS WILL STIMULATE A RECOVERY
KEYNES: “IN THE LONG RUN, WE ARE ALL DEAD”, MEANING COUNTRIES MAY NOT BE ABLE TO WAIT FOR A “NATURAL” RECOVERY
KEYNES – ECONOMY CAN FALL INTO A DOWNWARD SPIRAL
CONSUMERS REDUCE SPENDINGCOMPANIES SELL LESSCOMPANIES LAY-OFF WORKERSCONSUMERS HAVE LESS INCOMECONSUMERS REDUCE SPENDING MORECOMPANES SELL EVEN LESSCOMPANIES LAY-OFF MORE WORKERS
MAY TAKE YEARS FOR CYCLE TO BREAK
KEYNES – ONLY ENTITY BIG ENOUGH TO STOP THE FALL IS GOVERNMENT
GOVERNMENT TO USE ITS TAXING AND SPENDING POWER TO BREAK THE DOWNWARD CYCLE
IN A RECESSION: CUT TAXES AND INCREASE GOVERNMENT SPENDING – WILL GIVE CONSUMERS MORE SPENDING POWER AND GOVERNMENT SPENDING WILL LEAD TO MORE JOBS
THEN, WHEN THE RECESSION IS OVER
GOVERNMENT INCREASES TAXES AND REDUCES SPENDING
WILL KEEP THE ECONOMY FROM GROWING TOO FAST, WHICH MIGHT LEAD TO HIGHER INFLATION
ALSO ALLOWS DEBT TO BE REPAID
SO GOVERNMENT USES ITS BUDGET TO “LEAN AGAINST” THE BUSINESS CYCLE
“KEYNESIANISM” HAS BEEN EMBRACED
RICHARD NIXON: “WE ARE ALL KEYNESIANS NOW”
DURING RECESSIONS, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ALWAYS TRIES TO CURTAIL IT
DIFFERENT PARTIES MAY EMPHASIZE TAX CUTS VERSUS SPENDING INCREASES
ISSUES WITH FISCAL POLICY, 1
OFTEN TAKES CONSIDERABLE TIME TO IMPLEMENT FISCAL POLICY
ARGUMENTS AMONG POLITICIANS ABOUT DETAILS
RECESSION MAY BE OVER BY TIME POLICIES ARE APPROVED
ISSUES WITH FISCAL POLICY, 2
IN RECESSION, THE TAX CUTS AND INCREASED SPENDING WILL LEAD TO MORE GOVERNMENT BORROWING AND A LARGER NATIONAL DEBT
KEYNES – DEBT WOULD BE PAID IN PROSPEROUS TIMES
BUT DIFFICULT FOR POLITICIANS TO DO
ISSUES WITH FISCAL POLICY, 3
IS IT EFFECTIVE – DOES IT WORK?
ISSUE – WHERE DOES THE MONEY COME FROM THAT THE GOVERNMENT SPENDS?
KEYNES – “IDLE RESOURCES” – CASH HELD IN POCKETS OF CONSUMERS, WHICH INCREASES DURING RECESSIONS
ONE SOURCE: BANK EXCESS RESERVES
ANOTHER SOURCE: FOREIGN FUNDS
BUT…..
IF FUNDS GOVERNMENT BORROWS TO SPEND WOULD HAVE BEEN SPENT BY BUSINESSES OR HOUSEHOLDS ON SOMETHING ELSE, THEN NO NET GAIN – “CROWDING OUT”
OR, IF BUSINESSES AND HOUSEHOLDS THINK THE BORROWING WILL LEAD TO HIGHER TAXES LATER, THEN THEY MAY REDUCE SPENDING NOW – WHICH OFFSETS THE GOVERNMENT SPENDING;CALLED “TAX DISCOUNTING”
ECONOMISTS ARGUE OVER THE “MULTIPLER” EFFECT OF FISCAL POLICY
MULTIPLIER – APPLY TO GOVERNMENT SPENDING TO GIVE TOTAL IMPACT ON THE ECONOMY EXAMPLE: MULTIPLIER OF “2” – MEANS GOVERNMENT SPENDING OF $1 BILLION HAS A $2 BILLION TOTAL IMPACT ON THE ECONOMY
IS MULTIPLIER LARGER THAN 1, 1, OR 0 – BIG DEBATE!!!