736

First Nations Biomonitoring Initiative: National Results 2011 by … · 2017. 7. 20. · National Results (2011). Assembly of First Nations, 2013. Print. About the Assembly of First

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • First Nations Biomonitoring Initiative: National Results 2011 by the Assembly of First Nations.

    Copyright © National Indian Brotherhood, 2013

    This report can be cited as:

    Stuart Wuttke, Elsa LaCorte, Diego Garcia, and Maria Ooi. First Nations Biomonitoring Initiative: National Results (2011). Assembly of First Nations, 2013. Print.

  • About the Assembly of First Nations

    The Assembly of First Nations (AFN) is the national, political representative of First Nations governments and their citizens in Canada, including those living on reserve and in urban and rural areas. Every Chief in Canada is entitled to be a member of the Assembly. The National Chief is elected by the Chiefs in Canada, who in turn are elected by their citizens.

    The role and function of the Assembly is to serve as a national delegated forum for determining and harmonizing effective collective and co-operative measures on any subject matter that the First Nations delegate for review, study, response or action, and ultimately for advancing the aspirations of First Nations.

    For more information, please contact us at: 55 Metcalfe Street, Suite 1600 Ottawa, Ontario K1P 6L5

    Telephone: 613-241-6789 Toll-Free: 1-866-869-6789 Fax: 613-241-5808 or visit the AFN Web site: www.afn.ca

  • first nations biomonitoring initiative

    table of contents

    Foreword by national chieF shawn a-in-chut atleo 10

    1. research team 11

    1.1 research team ....................................................................................................................... 11

    1.2 acknowledgements ................................................................................................................ 12

    2. executive summary 13

    2.1 results ..................................................................................................................................... 13

    3. introduction to biomonitoring 15

    4. background and rationale 16

    4.1 First nation ownership of data: .......................................................................................... 17

    5. survey design 18

    5.1 Pilot study .............................................................................................................................. 18

    5.2 target Population and selection criteria ............................................................................ 18

    5.3 methodology .......................................................................................................................... 18

    5.4 limitations ............................................................................................................................. 18

    5.5 Fieldwork and laboratory analysis ..................................................................................... 18

    5.6 data collection ....................................................................................................................... 19

    5.7 reporting results to Participants: ....................................................................................... 19

    5.8 considerations for interpreting the biomonitoring data4: ............................................... 19

    5.9 data analysis .......................................................................................................................... 20

    6. ethical considerations 22

    7. chemicals measured 23

  • national results

    8. results by chemical grouP: metals and trace elements 24

    8.1 antimony ................................................................................................................................ 24

    8.2 arsenic .................................................................................................................................... 32

    8.3 cadmium ................................................................................................................................ 43

    8.4 copper .................................................................................................................................... 54

    08.5 lead ....................................................................................................................................... 66

    8.6 manganese .............................................................................................................................. 77

    8.7 mercury ................................................................................................................................... 88

    8.8 molybdenum ......................................................................................................................... 103

    8.9 nickel .................................................................................................................................... 115

    8.10 selenium ............................................................................................................................. 126

    8.11 uranium .............................................................................................................................. 138

    8.12 vanadium ............................................................................................................................ 149

    8.13 Zinc ..................................................................................................................................... 157

    8.14 organochlorines ................................................................................................................ 171

    8.14.1Aldrin........................................................................................................................................................171

    8.14.2Chlordane................................................................................................................................................179

    8.14.3Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane(DDT).........................................................................................211

    8.14.4Hexachlorobenzene..............................................................................................................................226

    8.14.5Hexachlorocyclohexane.......................................................................................................................234

    8.14.6Mirex.........................................................................................................................................................248

    8.14.7Toxaphene................................................................................................................................................256

    8.15 Polychlorinated biphenyls (Pcbs) ................................................................................... 271

    8.16 Polybrominated Flame retardants .................................................................................. 423

    8.17 Perfluorinated compounds (PFcs) ................................................................................. 485

    8.18 environmental Phenol ....................................................................................................... 515

    8.18.1BisphenolA..............................................................................................................................................515

    8.19 organophosphate insecticides ......................................................................................... 524

    8.20 Pyrethroid insecticides ...................................................................................................... 562

    8.21 Phenoxy herbicide ............................................................................................................ 595

    8.21.12,4-DichlorophenoxyaceticAcid(2,4-D)..........................................................................................595

    8.22 chlorophenol ..................................................................................................................... 603

    8.22.12,4-Dichlorophenol(2,4-DCP)...........................................................................................................603

    8.23 tobacco ............................................................................................................................... 611

    8.23.1Cotinine...................................................................................................................................................611

    8.24 Phthalates ........................................................................................................................... 624

    8.25 conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 695

  • first nations biomonitoring initiative

    aPPendices 697

    appendix 1: First nations biomonitoring initiative Pilot study: design and lessons learned ........................................................................................ 697

    appendix 2: sampling location within ecozones ............................................................................. 700

    appendix 3: household Questionnaire ............................................................................................ 701

    appendix 4: report of measurements ............................................................................................. 712

    appendix 5: Fnbi sample collection Procedure. ........................................................................... 713

    appendix 6: list of chemicals measured in the Fnbi .................................................................... 714

    appendix 7: limits of detection (lod) for environmental chemicals measured in the Fnbi .................................................................................................. 717

    appendix 8: individual consent Form .............................................................................................. 721

    appendix 9: acronyms and abbreviations ....................................................................................... 723

    appendix 10: Fnbi report on the weighting Process and variance estimation ......................... 724

    appendix 11: Fnbi sample design .................................................................................................. 730

    appendix 12: creatinine .................................................................................................................... 733

  • 10 national resultsnational results

    IamdelightedtointroducethisreportonbiomonitoringthatistheresultofcollaborativeworkbetweentheAssemblyofFirstNations,HealthCanada'sFirstNationsandInuitHealthBranch,andFirstNationcommunitiesacrossCanada.Thisisatimelyandusefulreport,whichprovidesbaselinedataonenvi-ronmentalcontaminantsfoundintheFirstNationon-reservepopulationacrossCanada.

    TheFirstNationsBiomonitoringInitiativehasbeenavaluabletoolinstartingtoaddressthegapinknowledgeabouttheexposureandconcentrationsofenvironmentalcontaminantsinFirstNationpeople.ThisisthefirststudyofthistypetofocusspecificallyonFirstNationpeoplelivingon-reservethatisdoneonarepresentativecross-countryandecozonescale.Thedatacontainedinthisreportwillserveasareferenceforfutureresearchtodeterminechangesintheenvironment,increasesordecreasesintheconcentrationsofchemicalsofconcern,andpotentiallycontributetopublicpolicyontheuseofvariouschemicalsforindustrialorpersonaluseinCanada.

    TheFirstNationsBiomonitoringInitiativeexaminesthepresenceofninety-sevenmetalsandchemicals.TheseincludeemergingcontaminantsofconcernsuchasbisphenolA(BPA),fireretardants,andchemicalsforwhichexposureguideline

    levelshavenotyetbeenset.Thereportrecognizesthatthereismorethatweshouldlearnaboutexposuretohouseholdandindustrialchemicals.TheAFNisconfidentthattheresultsofthisInitiativewillcontributetotheemergingscienceandresearchbeingconductedinsimilarprojectsthroughouttheworld.ThisreportalsoidentifiescertaingapsthatwillrequireadditionalresearchbyFirstNationsandgovernmenttopursueaspartofcontinualeffortstorefinetheevidence-basedknowl-edge,essentialtosupportsoundpolicy-making.Anessentialtaskforthenearfutureistoensurethatourchildren'shealthisprotectednow,bydevelopingbetterknowledgeoftheirexposuretopotentiallyharmfulchemicals.

    TheFirstNationsBiomonitoringInitiativeinvolvedfifteenFirstNationcommunitiesinallaspectsoftheproject,includingtheplanning,fieldwork,andprovidingCommunityResearchAssistantstoconductthesurveys.TheintegralinvolvementofFirstNationsintheBiomonitoringInitiativehasmeantthatFirstNations’questionsandconcernsarebeingaddressedinascientificallyvalidprocess.FirstNationcommunitieswillbeabletousethefindingsofthisreporttomonitorchangestotheirenvironmentandthebaselinedatacanbeusedtomoni-torchangesinexposureasaresultofindustrialdevelopmentandnewprojects.

    IwouldliketothanktheFNBIresearchteamandallFirstNationsandindividualswhoparticipatedintheFirstNationsBiomonitoringInitiative.TheAFNwaspleasedtoconductthisstudyandwelookforwardtoHealthCanada’scontin-uedcommitmenttoaddressingFirstNations’environmentalandhealthconcernsbysupportingresearchprojectsthatareconductedinfullpartnershipwithFirstNations.TheFirstNationsBiomonitoringInitiativeprovidesbenefitsforallandIhopethateveryonetakesadvantageofthemanyopportunitiesprovidedbythisreport.

    by national chief shawn a-in-chut atleo

    f o r e w o r d

  • 11first nations biomonitoring initiative

    1.1 research team

    1.1.1 assembly of First nationsStuart Wuttke,B.A.,LL.B.,LL.M.PrincipalInvestigatorMr.StuartWuttkeispresentlyGeneralCounselfortheAssemblyofFirstNations.Mr.Wuttkeoverseesalllegalmattersandcom-plianceissuesfortheAssemblyofFirstNations,anditsrelatedsubsidiaries.HewascalledtotheBarin1996.Priortothisrole,Mr.WuttkeservedastheDirectorofEnvironmentalStewardshipattheAssemblyofFirstNationsfrom2006to2010.Duringthisperiod,Mr.WuttkehasworkedonanumberofenvironmentalresearchprojectswithFirstNationcommunitiesrelatingtocontaminantsandenvironmentalimpacts.Hisworkintheen-vironmentalfieldextendedtobothdomesticandinternationaldialoguesinavarietyofsubjects.Mr.Wuttkewasinstrumentalintheestablishmentofa10yearFirstNationstraditionalfoodandcontaminantsstudyandthedevelopmentoftheFirstNationsBiomonitoringInitiativefortheAssemblyofFirstNations.

    Elsa La Corte,BEng,MEngPolicyAnalystAskilledenvironmentalprofessionalwithaMaster’sdegreeinEnvironmentalEngineeringandaBachelor’sdegreeinChemicalEngineering.Herprofessionalexperienceincludesthefoodmanufacturingindustrydevelopingnewformulationprotocolsandqualitysamplingandcontrol;inthebeveragemanufactur-ingindustryasaprocessanalystandtechnical/trainingwriter.InhercurrentpositionasaPolicyAnalystattheAssemblyofFirstNationsshehasworkedundertheenvironmentalhealthfile,responsiblefortheFirstNationsBiomonitoringInitiative(FNBI),supportingtheNationalFirstNationsEnvironmentalContaminantsProgram(NFNECP),amongothers,andhasrecentlyjoinedtheAFN’swatermanagementunit.

    Diego Garcia,M.D.,M.P.H.PublicHealthAdvisorAmedicalprofessionaltrainedinEmergencyMedicineandPublicHealth.HispreviouspositionsincludecoordinatingandimprovingpublichealthprogramsdeliveryacrossruraljurisdictionsinVenezuela;diseasesurveillanceandimmuniza-tionsofficerfortheWorldHealthOrganizationinAngola;and,currentlyworkingasthePublicHealthAdvisorandEnvironmentalHealthleadfortheAssemblyofFirstNationsinOttawa.ThroughouthiscareerDr.Garciahasgainedadeep

    understandingoftheissuesandchallengesinvolvedinhealthservicedeliverytoremoteandindigenouspopulations.

    Jarrett LaughlinSeniorResearchAnalystMr.LaughlinworksasaSeniorResearchAnalystattheAssemblyofFirstNations.Hehasco-chairedthenationalworkinggroupfortheBandOperatedFundingFormulaandhasworkedwithseveralorganizationstodevelopFirstNationseducationfundingmodels.Mr.LaughlinhasrecentlyworkedfortheCanadianCouncilonLearningidentifyinginnovativeandholisticapproachestomeasuringsuccessforFirstNations,Inuit,andMétislearning.

    1.1.2 health canada / technical advice

    Maria OoiHead,BiomonitoringProgram,FirstNations&InuitHealthBranch,HealthCanadaMs.Ooiisanenvironmentalhealthspecialist,withover17yearsofexperienceinthisfield.Inhercurrentposition,sheisinvolvedinenvironmentalhealthsurveillanceandmonitoringprograms,focusingonenvironmentalcontaminantsandtheirimpactstohumanhealth.Aswell,Ms.Ooihasbeenengagedincommunity-basedmonitoringandresearchwithFirstNations.Priortothisposition,shehasworkedasanenvironmentalhealthadvisorforover10yearswithHealthCanadawheresheacquiredin-depthknowledgeofenvironmentalassess-mentsandthehealthimpactsassociatedwithdevelopmentprojects.Whilelivingabroad,Ms.OoiworkedforHabitatforHumanity,toimproveenvironmentally/energyefficienthomesandspearheadthemovetoestablishanaffiliates’network.

    Bill Martin,BScEnvironmentalHealthScientist,HealthCanadaMr.Martinisanenvironmentalscientistwithexpertiseinenvi-ronmentalcontaminantsandexposureassessment.InhisformercapacityasanenvironmentalchemistwithEnvironmentCanadaandasaresearchtechnicianwiththeDepartmentofFisheriesandOceans,hehasexperienceinlaboratoryandfieldwork,analysingenvironmentalsamplesincontaminantmonitoring,andconductingtoxicologicalexposureassessments.Mr.Martinalsohasworkedonsafetyassessmentsforchemicalcontaminationofimportedfoods,andenvironmentaleffectsmonitoringpolicy.Hehasrecentlyacceptedanewchallenge,andcontinuestosupporttheFNBIwhilemanagingaPublicHealthprogramforHealthCanada’sFirstNationsandInuitHealthBranch.

    c h a p t e r o n eresearch team

  • 12 national results

    1.2 acknowledgements

    TheAssemblyofFirstNationswouldliketoexpressitsdeep-estappreciationtotheFirstNationcommunitiesthatpartici-patedinthesurveyandacknowledgethatthissurveywouldnothavebeenpossiblewithouttheirgeneroussupportandcommitment.TheAssemblyofFirstNationswouldalsoliketoofferitsspecialthankyoutoalltheFirstNationindividualswhoparticipatedinthissurvey.Theirvaluablecontributionsarereflectedthroughoutthisreport

    Inaddition,theAssemblyofFirstNationswouldliketothankthefollowingorganizationswhohaveprovidedourresearchteamwithvaluabletechnicalsupportandadvice:

    InstitutnationaldesantépubliqueduQuébec(INSPQ)-CentredetoxicologieduQuébec(CTQ)

    • AlainLeBlanc

    • MarioMarchand

    • ClaudeThellen

    SocialSurveyMethods,StatisticsCanada

    • ValérieBizier

    • CraigSeko

    EnvironmentalPublicHealthDivision,FirstNationsandInuitHealthBranch,HealthCanada

    • RoyKwiatkowski

    • DianeMcClymontPeace

    • Dr.ConstantineTikhonov

    • Regionalstaff

    HealthyEnvironmentsandConsumerSafetyBranch,HealthCanada

    • DougHaines

    • EllenLye

    • LeonoraMarro

    • NellieRoest

    • Allindividualchemicalspecialists

    TheAssemblyofFirstNationsappreciatesthegenerousfinan-cialsupportoftheFirstNationsandInuitHealthBranch,whoprovidedfundingforthisstudy.

    Finally,theAssemblyofFirstNationswouldliketoextenditsap-preciationtothepeerreviewersforvolunteeringtheirtimeandgenerouslysharingtheirscientificknowledgeandexpertise.

  • 13first nations biomonitoring initiative

    TheFirstNationsBiomonitoringInitiative(FNBI)seekstoestablishbaselineinformationonhumanexposuretoenviron-mentalchemicalsforFirstNations’peopleon-reservesouthofthe60°parallel.FirstNationshavebeenconcernedabouttheimpactsofenvironmentalpollutionandtheuseofindustrialandhouseholdchemicalsonthehumanpopulation.However,verylittleisknownabouttheeffectsofalargenumberofenvironmentalchemicals,orwhatthecombinationsofthesechemicals,mighthaveonthehumanbody.Inaddition,thereislittleinformationaboutthesechemicalsandtheirconcentra-tionsthatmaybepresentinFirstNationpopulations.TheFNBIattemptstofillthisgapinknowledge.

    FirstNationscontinuetorelyonthelandandtheenvironmentforcultural,spiritualandnutritionalpurposes.ThisattachmentispresumedtoincreaseFirstNations'exposuretoenviron-mentalchemicalsandthehealthrisksthesechemicalsmayimposeonindividuals.Untilnow,verylittleornonationallyrepresentativeinformationexistsonFirstNationsexposuretoenvironmentalchemicals,makingthisInitiativethefirststudyofitskindinCanada.ThisstudyisalsothefirstbiomonitoringinvestigationunderthecompletecontrolandauthorityofFirstNations,demonstratingthelevelofcommitmentandrespon-sibilitythattheFirstNationleadershipcanundertaketowardtheprogressandwell-beingoftheirpeoples.

    TheFNBIinvolvedatotaloffifteenFirstNationcommunitiesacrossCanada.Twoofthesecommunitieswereinvolvedasapilotstudy.TheremainingthirteenFirstNationcommunitieswereselectedthrougharandomdraw.Fortytwoparticipantspercommunitywereselectedforparticipationinthesurveyduringthesummer/fall2011.Theparticipantscompletedaphysicalexaminationwithanthropometricandclinicalinforma-tioncollection;ahouseholdquestionnairetoassessrisk,expo-sureandutilizationofthechemicalsinthestudy;andprovidedabiologicalspecimenofbloodandurine.Thebiologicalspeci-mensweresubsequentlyanalyzedbyacertifiedlaboratory.Datawascollected,aggregatedandanalyzedinspring2012andresultscontainedinthisreport.

    Thisstudywasguidedby Tri-Council Policy Statement - Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans,fromHealthCanadaandthePublicHealthAgencyofCanada'sResearchEthicsBoard.TheFNBIwillprovideimportanthealthinformation

    toadvancehealthsurveillanceandresearchinCanada,whileprovidingtrainingopportunitiestoFirstNations’peopletoenhanceresearchcapacity.TheFNBIestablishesbaselinedataforfutureusebypublichealthdecision-makersandscientiststohelpFirstNationsfocusonspecifichealth-relatedissues.

    2.1 results

    DatawerecollectedfromthirteenrandomlyselectedFirstNationcommunitiesinCanada.Ineachcommunity,upto42people,20yearsofageorabovewereselected.Womenwhowerepregnantandthoseindividualsundergoingchemo-therapywereexcludedfromthestudy.Intotal,therewere503FirstNationindividualswhoparticipatedinthestudy.Theoverallparticipationratewas92%.Resultsproducedbythestudywerereturnedtoparticipantsafteranalysis,unlesstheyhadexpressedadesirenottoreceivethemduringsampling.Aswell,earlynotificationtoparticipantswasdoneincaseswhereparticipants'resultsexceededtheCanadianbloodleadinterventionlevelof10microgramsperdeciliter(μg/dL)(setbytheCommiteeforEnvironmentalandOccupationalHealth(CEOH)in1994)orthebloodmercuryguidancevalueof20μg/Lforadults(HealthCanada,2004).Cadmiumwasalsoreportedtoparticipantsiftheyexceededtheoccupationalguidelineforbloodcadmiumof5μg/L(INSPQ,2008).

    The97environmentalchemicalsexaminedundertheFNBIwereselectedfromacandidatelistofover200individualchemicalsand/orgroups.Thosethatwereselectedwerebasedonconsid-erationssuchassuspectedhealthrisks,levelofpublicconcernandcomparabilitywithotherstudies.TheFNBIexaminedthefollowing:tracemetals,polychlorinatedbiphenyls,polybromi-nateddiphenylethers,organochlorinepesticides,perfluorinatedcompounds,environmentalphenol,phthalates,pesticides,andcotinine(ametaboliteofnicotine).TheFNBIwasadministeredusingreliablemethodologies.Appropriatelipidorcreatinineadjustmentsforsamplelevelshavebeenmade.

    TheresultsoftheFNBIarepresentedatanationalaggregatelevelandecozonelevels.Therewerefiveecozones,whereaminimumoftwocommunitieshadtobesampledineachstratumtoallowforvarianceestimation.Ecozoneswereutilizedonthepremisethatcertaincontaminantscouldbe

    executive summary c h a p t e r t w o

  • 14 national results

    morepronouncedincertaingeographicalareasacrossCanada.Finally,theresultsoftheFNBIarestatisticallycomparedtotheCanadianHealthMeasuresSurvey(CHMS),ahealthsurveyofthegeneralCanadianpopulation.ComparisonswithCHMSresults,however,oughttobeinterpretedwithcautionasitstargeturbanpopulationslightlydiffersfromtheFirstNationpopulation,sinceFirstNationcommunitiesaremostlylocatedinisolatedorruralareas.

    InthevastmajorityofFNBIresults,therearenosignificantdifferencesbetweenthebloodorurinelevelsoftracemetalsandotherchemicalsbetweentheFNBIandCHMSpopula-tions.Thereareafewexceptions,however.CotininelevelsaresignificantlyhigherinFirstNationparticipantsthanthoseshowninCHMS,whichislikelytheresultofahigherpercent-ageofsmokersandsecondhandsmokeexposureinFirstNations.ThequestionnairesrevealthattherateofFirstNationsmokersis65%,almostfourtimeshigherthantheCanadianpopulation.ThisisalsothelikelycontributortothefindingofsignificantlyhighercadmiuminFirstNations,althoughthiswasnotspecificallyexplored.

    AnumberofchemicalswerefoundtobelowerintheFirstNationpopulation.Forinstance,bloodleadconcentrationswerestatisticallylowercomparedtolevelsofthegeneralCanadianpopulation.Severalorganiccompoundssuchastrans-nonachlor,beta-hexachlorocyclohexane(b-HCH),anddimethylphosphate(DMP)areallstatisticallylowerintheFirstNationpopulation,ascomparedtotheCHMSpopulation.

    Theresultsformercuryposecertainambiguitiesthatwillre-quirefurtherinvestigation.Totalmercurybloodconcentrationsgavealargerangeofresults,wherethecoefficientofvariationwashigh.Thus,directstatisticalcomparisonwiththeCanadianpopulationwasnotpossible.However,astatisticalcomparisonperformedonacommunitybasiswaspossibleinsixofthe

    thirteenFirstNationcommunities.Inthiscase,thesixFirstNationcommunitieshadstatisticallyhigherlevelsthantheCanadianpopulation.Oneinterestingfindingwaswithrespecttoinorganicmercuryfoundintheurinarysamples.StatisticalcomparisonsbetweenFNBIandCHMSsampleswerenotpossibleduetothefactthatmeanswerenotcalculatedfortheCHMSsamplesinceover40%ofthesamplewasbelowthelimitofdetection(LOD).TheFNBIestimateswerecalculatedbecauselessthan40%wasbelowtheLOD.ThisfindingledtheauthorstobelievethattheremaybeagreaterexposuretoinorganicmercuryintheFNBIpopulationthantheCHMSpopulation,butitrequiresfurtherinvestigation.

    Anotherinterestingfindingrelatestothedifferenceinthenationaldataascomparedtotheecozonedata.Inthenationalleveldata,arseniclevelsweresignificantlylowerintheFNBIsample.However,whenobservingthearsenicbloodlevelsattheecozonelevelbyagedistribution,thePacificregiontotaland20-39yeargroupshavesignificantlyhigherlevelsthanthoseofthesameCHMSgroups.Thesamecanbeobservedintheecozonedatabygenderforurinaryarsenic(creatinineadjusted)forthe20-39agegroup.Thiswouldbeausefulareaforfurtherstudy.

    TheFNBIhasbeenavaluabletoolinaddressingthegapsinknowledgeaboutthelevelsofenvironmentalchemicalsintheFirstNationpopulation.Itshouldbenotedthatthisisthefirststudyofthistypetobedoneonarepresentativecross-countryscale.Thedatacollectedwillserveasabenchmarkforfuturestudiestodetermineifchangesintheenvironmentareresultinginanincreaseordecreaseinconcentrationsofchemicalsofconcerns.TheFNBIprovidesausefulbaselineforsubsequentlongitudinalstudiesaswellasforthestudyofspecifichotspotsorareasofconcern.

  • 15first nations biomonitoring initiative

    c h a p t e r t h r e eintroduction to biomonitoring

    Everyday,peopleareexposedtothousandsofchemicals-throughtheair,food,drinkingwater,andthingsthatcomeintocontactwithourskin.ItiswidelyassumedthatFirstNationpeoples’livinginremoteareasareatahigherriskofexposurethanthegeneralpopulationbecauseoftheirclosertiestotheland.Forexample,whilerelianceontraditionalfoodssuchasfish,marineanimalsandwildgamehascultural,spiritual,andnutritionalsignificance,thesefoodsourcesalsotendtohavehigherconcentrationsofmercuryandpersistentorganicpol-lutants(POPs).Thesechemicalsbuildupinthefattytissuesoffish,marinemammalsandotherfoodsourcesthroughtheprocessofbioaccumulationwhichcanthenbioaccumulateinpeopleconsumingit.

    Biomonitoringhasbecomeanessentialtoolineffortstoidentifyandcontrolpeoples’exposuretoenvironmentalchemicals.Humanbiomonitoringisthemeasurementinpeople,ofachemical,theproductsitmakesafterithasbrokendown,ortheproductsthatmightresultfrominteractionsinthebody.Thesemeasurementsareusuallymadeinbloodandurineandsome-timesinothertissuesandfluidssuchashair,nails,andbreastmilk.Themeasurementstakenindicatehowmuchofachemicaloritselementsarepresentinthatpersonatagiventime.

    National-levelbiomonitoringinitiativesincludetheEuropeanUnion-wideCOPHES(ConsortiumtoPerformHuman

    BiomonitoringonaEuropeanScale)-currentlyinadem-onstrationphasecalledDEMOCOPHES,theUnitedStatesCenterforDiseaseControlNHANES(NationalHealthandNutritionExaminationStudy),andtheAustralianBureauofStatistics’NHS(NationalHealthSurvey).Canadahasjoinedtheranksofnationalbiomonitoringinitiativeswiththeongo-ingCanadianHealthMeasuresSurvey(CHMS).theranksofnationalbiomonitoringinitiativeswiththeongoingCanadianHealthMeasuresSurvey(CHMS).WhiletheCHMSisintendedtorepresenttheCanadianpopulation,itdoesnotincludeFirstNationpeopleslivingonreserve.

    Assuch,thereisnorepresentativebaselineinformationontheextentofhumanexposure/bodyburdenofFirstNationpeoples’onreserveinregardtopersistentorganicpollutantsandheavymetals.ToaddressthisissueandtocomplementtheCHMS,theFNBIwasestablished.

    TheFNBIreliesondatacollectedfromsamplesofadultmemberslivinginFirstNation(FN)communities.Allsamples–communities,householdsandindividuals–wereselectedusingrandommechanisms.Estimatingstatistics(e.g.,means,ratios,totals,percentiles)fromprobabilitysamplesrequiressomelevelofcareiftheestimatesaretoremainrepresentative(un-biased)ofthepopulationfromwhichthedatawerecollected.Moreover,sample-basedstatisticswillbepublishedalongwithanestimateoftheirsamplingerror.

  • 16 national resultsnational results

    background and rationale

    c h a p t e r f o u r

    Environmentalhealtheffortsbygovernments,researchers,andthoseinthehealthfieldhavebeensparkedbytheneedtoidentify,understandandwheneverpossible,reducepeo-ple’sexposuretopotentiallyharmfulenvironmentalchemicals.Biomonitoringisatoolthathasbecomecentraltotheseefforts.

    TheCHMSisanationalsurveythatisbeingledbyStatisticsCanadainpartnershipwithHealthCanadaandthePublicHealthAgencyofCanadathatthemostcomprehensive,directhealthmeasuressurveyconductedinCanada.IthasbeendesignedtorepresenttheCanadianpopulationandcollectsinformationonthegeneralhealthandlifestyleofCanadiansthroughinterviewsanddirectphysicalmeasurements(i.e.weightandheight),toprovideinformationonchronicandinfectiousdiseases,physicalfitness,nutrition,andotherfactorsthatinfluencehealth1.TheCHMSalsoincludesabiomonitoringcomponent,wherebloodandurinesamplesarecollectedtoprovideinformationonexpo-suretoenvironmentalchemicals.

    WhiletheCHMSisintendedtorepresenttheCanadianpopulation,itdoesnotincludeFirstNationpeopleslivingonreserves.Assuch,thereisnorepresentativebaselineinforma-tionontheextentofhumanexposure/bodyburdenofFirstNationpeoplesonreserveinregardtochemicals(includingpersistentorganicpollutants,tracemetals,etc.).

    TheFNBIseekstoaddressthisinformationgap.TheAssemblyofFirstNations(AFN),inpartnershipwithHealthCanada(throughtheFirstNations&InuitHealthBranch-FNIHB),carriedoutahumanbiomonitoringprogramwhichincludedahouseholdquestionnaire,directphysicalmeasure-ments(i.e.heightandweight),andthecollectionofbloodandurinesamplestoprovidebaselineinformationofFirstNationpeoples’exposurelevelstoenvironmentalchemicals.Thisini-tiativewasimplementedthroughleadershipandpartnershipwithFirstNationsauthoritiesandwasadaptedforculturalappropriatenessandsafetythroughconsultationswiththeFirstNationcommunities.

    TheFNBIisa5-year(2008-2013)nationalhealthsurvey,exclusivelyforFirstNationpeoples’livingonreserve,southof60o.TheAFNcarriedoutthisInitiativeandFNIHBservedasfunderandtechnicaladvisor.

    TheFNBI’smainobjectiveistoestablishanationalbaselineofFirstNations’exposureto97environmentalchemicals(persistentorganicpollutants,tracemetals,andahostofotherchemicals).OtherobjectivesoftheFNBIareto:

    • Allowindividuals,theirfamiliesandFirstNationcommunitiestobecomemoreawareofandtakestepstominimizetheirexposuretoenvironmentalchemicals;

    • AllowforcomparisonbetweenFirstNations’exposuretoenvironmentalchemicalsandthoseoftheCanadianpopulation,whicharebeingmeasuredundertheCHMS;

    • Overtime,tracktrendsofexposurelevelsinFirstNationspopulations,identifyprioritychemicals,andguidefurtheractionbyindividuals,communitiesandgovernment(s);

    • Collectinformationthatcannototherwisebegatheredfromquestionnairesalone;

    • Exploreemergingenvironmentalpublichealthissuesandnewmeasurementtechnologies.

    1.HealthCanada,“ReportonHumanBiomonitoringofEnvironmentalChemicalsinCanada.ResultsoftheCanadianHealthMeasuresSurveyCycle1(2007-2009),2010.(CHMSReport)Retrievedfromwww.healthcanada.gc.ca

  • 17first nations biomonitoring initiative

    4.1 First nation ownership of data:

    TheFirstNationsBiomonitoringInitiative(FNBI)wasdesignedtoberespectfultotheFirstNationsprinciplesofOwnership,Control,AccessandPossession(OCAP)2:

    Ownershipwherebycommunitiesowninformationcollectively,thesamewayasanindividualownstheirpersonalinformation;Controlofallaspectsofresearchandinformationmanagement,thatimpactFirstNations,fromconceptiontocompletion;AccesstoFirstNationsinformationanddata,regardlessofwhereitisstored;and,Possessionofthedatasothatownershipcanbeprotected.Ifdataisownedbyapartybutisinpossessionofanother,thereisriskofbreach;

    ThisapproachensuresthatFirstNationcommunities,whoaretheparticipants,makethedecisionsabouttheprocess,thedatacollectionandanalysis,anddecision-making.

    TheAFNactsascustodianfortheresultingbiomonitoringdata,whiletheFirstNationcommunitiesthatparticipatedinthestudywouldowntheirowndataandcontrolthefutureuse,disseminationortransferofdata.ThebenefitsofOCAParemultiple;someofthemareexplainedasfollows:

    • Helpsrebuildcommunitytrustinresearch;

    • Higherparticipationrates;

    • Encouragesmoreholistic(FN)approachtohealth;

    • PromotesFirstNationsanalysesandperspectivesthatminimizesbiasesandmisinterpretations;and

    • Contributestocommunityempowerment,self-determination,andhealingactivitiesandencouragesmeaningfulcapacitydevelopment.

    2.FirstNationsInformationGovernanceCentre(2010).The First Nations Principles of OCAP: What is OCAP?Retrievedfromhttp://www.fnigc.ca/node/2.

  • 18 national resultsnational results

    survey designc h a p t e r f i v e

    5.1 Pilot study

    ApilotstudywascarriedouttodeterminethefeasibilityofimplementingthefullscaleFNBIhealthsurveyandrevealanychallengesinthesampledesign.ThepilotstudyallowedtheFNBIteamtotestlogisticsandgatherinformationoninterac-tionswithFirstNationcommunitiesandparticipants.Thepilotstudywascarriedoutwiththeaimofmodifyingareasofcon-cern,asanyrevealeddeficienciesinthedesignorprocedurescouldbecorrectedbeforetimeandresourceswereexpendedforthefullsurvey.Thepilotstudyledtomanyobservationsandlessonslearned,particularlyintheareasof:logisticsandoperationalprocedures;amountoftimetoconductallaspectsofthesurvey;gaugingFirstNationinterestandparticipation;appropriatenessofthecommunicationsplantoparticipantsandthecommunity;andhumanandfinancialresources.FurtherdetailsonthepilotstudycanbefoundinAppendix1.

    5.2 target Population and selection criteria

    Forthepurposeofthisstudy,participantswererandomlyselectedamongtheFNBItargetpopulationwhichincludespeoplelivingonreserveaged20yearsorolder.Participantswereretainedforthestudyonlyiftheywereabletoprovidewritteninformedconsent.However,participantswereex-cludediftheywerepregnantoriftheyhadrecentlyundergonechemotherapy,astherewouldnothavebeenenoughoftheseparticipantstodetermineiftheirexposuresweresignificantlydifferentthantherestofthecommunity.

    5.3 methodology

    TheFNBIfollowedanecozoneapproachsincethesegeograph-icareaswereestablishedaccordingtoecosystemboundarieswithsimilarvegetationandwildlife,whichconformstotradi-tionalFirstNationslanduse.Aminimumof2communitiesperecozonewerechosenbyrandomselectionand,similarly,42participantswererandomlyselectedwithineachcommunity.RefertoAppendix2fortheecozones&sampleallocationandAppendix10&11forFNBImethodology.

    5.4 limitations

    Aswithotherbiomonitoringstudies,theFNBIencounteredanumberoflimitations.Tobegin,thenumberofcommunitymemberscontainedinFirstNationbandlistswasnotretainedtobeusedintheanalysisduetoprivacyconcernsandattherequestofFirstNationgovernments.Itssignificanceisex-plainedinthesurveydesignsection.

    ThelimitedbudgetofthestudyalsoposedsomelimitationsfortheInitiative,whichmeantthatthesamplesizeinboththenumberofcommunitiesandthenumberofparticipantsineachhadtobereduced.Thisresourcelimitationisalsothereasonwhythestudyexcludedpersons19yearsofageandunder,aswellaspregnantwomen.Ontheanalysisside,thesmallsampletranslatedtotheimpossibilityofprovidingananalysisusingbothgenderandagegroups;thus,thedecisionwasmadetoprovidetheresultsbygenderonly.Secondly,theanalysisresolutionpowerwaslimitedtoonlyprovidingana-tionallevelviewandcommunitylevelunderstanding,withoutecozonelevelanalysis.Andfinally,giventhehighcoefficientofvariationintheresults,theFNBIreportisbasedonthegeometricmean(G.M)andnotthe95thpercentile.

    5.5 Fieldwork and laboratory analysis

    FieldworktookplaceintheselectedFirstNationcom-munities,andincludedthefollowingcomponents:physicalmeasurements,ahouseholdquestionnaire,andbiospecimencollection.CommunityResearchAssistants(CRAs)wereresponsibleforadministeringthehouseholdquestionnairetoparticipants,whichcouldbecompletedattheparticipant’shomeoratthehealthfacilityandintheirownlanguage.PhysicalmeasurementsandbiospecimensamplecollectionwereperformedbyaRegisteredNurse.Measurementsandsamplecollectionweretakenatthehealthfacilityonreserveaccordingtostandardhealthcareprotocols.Theparticipantwasaskedaseriesofscreeningquestionspriortothestartoftheclinicprocesstoensurethatheorshewaseligibleforthetests,sincesomemedicationsandphysicalconditionsmayexcludeapersonfromthestudy.Physicalmeasurementsin-cludedheight,weight,skinfold,circumferences,restingheartrateandbloodpressure(Appendix4).Thenursecollected

  • 19first nations biomonitoring initiative

    20milliliters(mL)ofbloodandaminimumof20mLofurinefromparticipants(Appendix5).Theprojectcoordinatorwasresponsiblefortemporarilystoringthesamplesinfreezersat-20oC,andshippedthesetotheaccreditedlaboratory.ShipmentswerepackagedaccordingtotheInternationalAirTransportAssociation(IATA)andTransportofDangerousGoods(TDG)Regulations.

    Laboratoryanalysisof97environmentalchemicalsandcreati-ninewasperformedattheCentredetoxicologyduQuébec(CTQ)ofL’InstitutnationaldesantépubliqueduQuébec(INSPQ),QuébecCity.AnalyseswereconductedaccordingtoacceptedmethodsandatthesameCanadianAssociationforLaboratoryAccredited(CALA)certifiedlaboratoryusedintheCHMSstudytoensuremaximumcomparabilityofresults.TheINSPQisaccreditedunderISO1725andfollowedstandard-izedoperatingprocedures.

    DescriptionsoftheanalyticalmethodsusedintheFNBIhavebeenpreviouslypublishedbytheCanadianHealthMeasuresSurvey(HealthCanada,20103).

    5.6 data collection

    Uponsigningtheconsentform,whichincludedthepar-ticipant’snameandcontactinformationforthepurposeofcommunicatingresultsofanalysis,participantswereassignedanumberandassociatedbarcode.Allotherdocumentationwaslabeledwiththebarcodeonly,ratherthantheparticipants’nameorotheridentifyinginformation,toensureprotectionoftheparticipants’privacy.

    Thestepsthataparticipantwasaskedtocompleteincluded:signingtheconsentform(refertoAppendix8);complet-ingthequestionnaire(administeredbytheCRA)(refertoAppendix3);submittingtoasuiteofphysicalmeasurements(i.e.height,weight,bloodpressure,bodymassindex(BMI),skinfold,waist-to-hipratio);andprovidingbiospecimensam-ples(bloodandurine)forchemicalanalysis.Physicalmeasure-mentsandbiospecimensamplecollectionwereperformedbetweenJulyandOctober,2011byacontractedRegisteredNursefromanagency.

    CommunityResearchAssistants(CRAs)wereneededtoassistinconductingthequestionnaires.ThedecisiontohirelocalpeopleasCRAsservedseveralpurposes;havingalocal,familiarfaceconducttheinterviewsandserveasinterpreters/transla-torsasneeded;initiatecontactwiththerandomlyselectedparticipants;scheduleappointments;organizethecommunityandfacilitiesforthearrivalofthefieldteam;contributetothe

    capacitybuildingatthelocallevel;and,providetemporarylocalemployment.Thosewithpriorresearchstudyexperienceandappropriateeducation,weresought,inconsultationwiththeCommunityHealthDirectors,andhiredforthedurationofFNBIsampling-normallyoneweek.

    5.7 reporting results to Participants:

    Thedecisionwasmadethatparticipantsshouldhavetherighttotheirownpersonalresults.Assuch,allresultswerere-turnedtoparticipantsafteranalysis,unlesstheyhadexpressedthedesirenottoreceivethemduringsampling.Aswell,earlynotificationwasdoneincaseswhereaparticipant’sresultsexceededtheCanadianbloodleadinterventionlevelof10μg/dL(setbytheCEOHin1994)orthe1994HealthCanadabloodmercuryguidanceforadultsof20μg/L(sincetheyaretheonlyacceptedguidelinelevelsinblood,todate).Cadmiumwasalsoreportedtoparticipantsiftheyexceededtheoccu-pationalguidelineforbloodcadmiumof5μg/L(INSPQ,2008).Oncephysicalmeasurementsweretaken(e.g.bloodpressure,heartrate,bodymeasurements),participantswereimmediatelyprovidedwiththeirwrittenresultsfromthenurse.

    Inadditiontoprovidingeachindividualparticipantwiththeirresults,theAFNprovidedcommunityreportstoeachpar-ticipatingFirstNationandincludedtheircompletedataset.Whererequested,theFNBIteamreturnedtotheparticipatingFirstNationcommunitytomakeaformalpresentationoftheresultsfromtheStudytotheleadership,healthofficialsandcommunityatlarge.TheAFNalsoprovidedsubsequentreportsoverteleconferencestocommunityofficials.Theparticipat-ingFirstNationcommunitiesexpressedsinceregratitudeforAFN'seffortstoreportfindingsbacktothecommunity.

    5.8 considerations for interpreting the biomonitoring data4:

    ComparisonswithCHMSresultsshouldbeinterpretedwithcautionasitstargetpopulationslightlydiffersfromtheFNBItargetpopulation.CHMSwasconductedinageographicareawithapopulationofatleast10,000andamaximumrespond-enttraveldistanceof100kilometers.ThisdiffersfromtheFirstNationrealitywherecommunitiesvaryinsizeandpopulationandaremostlylocatedinisolatedorruralareas.

    TheFNBIwasdesignedtoprovideestimatesofenvironmentalchemicalconcentrationsinbloodorurinefortheadultFirstNationpopulationasawhole.Thesurveywasnotdesigned

    3.HealthCanada(2010).ReportonHumanBiomonitoringofEnvironmentalChemicalsinCanada.ResultsoftheCanadianHealthMeasuresSurveyCycle1(2007-2009).(CHMSReport)Retrievedfromwww.healthcanada.gc.ca

    4.TakenfromHealthCanada(2010).ReportonHumanBiomonitoringofEnvironmentalChemicalsinCanada.ResultsoftheCanadianHealthMeasuresSurveyCycle1(2007-2009).(CHMSReport)Retrievedfromwww.healthcanada.gc.ca

  • 20 national results

    tocovertheentirepopulation,norwasitdesignedtopermitfurtherbreakdownofdatabycommunity.Inaddition,theFNBIdesigndidnottargetspecificexposurescenariosandconsequently,didnotselectorexcludeeithercommunitiesorrespondentsonthebasisoftheirpotentialforloworhighexposurestoenvironmentalchemicals.

    Biomonitoringcanestimatehowmuchofachemicalispresentinaperson,butcannottellyouwhathealtheffects,ifany,mayresultfromthatexposure.Technologyinthemeasurementofchemicalsatverylowlevelshasadvancedeventhoughthepresenceofachemicalinaperson’sbodydoesnotnecessarilymeanthatitwillcauseahealtheffect.Severalfactorssuchastheamount,theduration,frequencyandtimingofexposureandthetoxicityofthechemicalareimportantinordertodeterminewhetheradversehealtheffectsmayoccur.Forchemicalssuchasleadormercury,researchstudieshaveprovideduswithagoodunderstandingofwhathealthrisksareassociatedwithdifferentlevelsinblood.However,formanychemicals,furtherresearchisneededtounderstandthehealtheffects,ifany,fromdiffer-entbloodorurineconcentrations.Furthermore,smalldosesofcertainchemicalsareessentialforthemaintenanceofgoodhealth(e.g.manganeseandzinc)sosmallamountswouldbeexpectedtobepresentinthebody.Inaddition,chemicalswillinteractdifferentlydependingontheindividual.Certainpopula-tions(children,pregnantwomen,andtheelderlyorimmuno-compromisedpeople)maybemoresusceptibletotheeffectsofchemicalexposure.

    Theabsenceofachemicaldoesnotnecessarilymeanapersonhasnotbeenexposed.Itmaybethatthetechnologyisnotca-pableofmeasuringsuchasmallamount,orthattheexposureoccurredatanearlierpointintime,allowingforthechemicaltobeeliminatedfromtheperson’sbodybeforemeasurementtookplace.Biomonitoringcannottellusthesourceorrouteoftheexposurebutitindicatesthetotalamountthatisinthebodyatagiventime,andaccountsforallroutesofexposure(ingestion,inhalation,skincontact)andfromallsources(air,water,soil,food,andconsumerproducts).

    Manychemicals–lead,mercury,cadmium,andarsenicforexample–occurnaturallyintheenvironmentandarealsopresentinhuman-madeproducts.Withtheexceptionofmet-als,mostoftheurinemeasurementsinthissurveyquantifychemicalmetabolites.Formanychemicals,parentcompoundsmaybebrokendown(i.e.,metabolized)intooneormoremetabolites.Somemetabolitesarespecifictooneparentcompound,whileothersarecommontoseveralparentcom-pounds.Severalurinarymetabolitesarealsoenvironmentalmetabolites(e.g.,dialkylphosphatemetabolites)andtheir

    presenceinurinedoesnotnecessarilymeanthatanexposuretotheparentchemicalhasoccurred;ratherexposurecouldbetothemetaboliteitselfinenvironmentalmediasuchasfood,water,orair.Factorsthatcontributetomeasuredbloodandurinelevelsincludethequantityenteringthebodythroughallroutesofexposure,absorptionrates,distributiontovarioustissuesinthebody,metabolism,andexcretionofthechemi-caland/oritsmetabolitesfromthebody.Theseprocessesaredependentonboththecharacteristicsofthechemical,includ-inglipophilicity,pH,andparticlesize,andthecharacteristicsoftheindividual,suchasage,diet,healthstatus,andrace5(Teassetal.,2003).Forthesereasons,thewayinwhichachemicalwillactinthebodywilldifferamongindividualsandcannotbepredictedwithcertainty.

    Thisreportdoesnotexaminetrendsovertimeasthisisthefirstsurveyofits’kind,specifictoFirstNations.ResultsfromfuturecyclesofFNBI,orsimilarstudies,maybecomparedtothebaselinedatainordertoexaminetrendsinFirstNations’exposurestoselectedenvironmentalchemicals.

    5.9 data analysis

    DatatablesarepresentedforeachchemicalmeasuredundertheFNBI.Thesetablesinclude:samplesize(n),percentageofresultsthatfallbelowthelimitofdetection(%

  • 21first nations biomonitoring initiative

    kglipid).Inordertoreflecttheamountofthesechemicalsthatarestoredinbodyfat,theconcentrationsofthesechemicalsarereportedrelativetolipids(HealthCanada,2010)6.

    Forchemicalsmeasuredinurine,concentrationsarepresentedasweightofchemicalpervolumeofurine(μgchemical/Lurine)andadjustedforurinarycreatinine(μgchemical/gcre-atinine).Urinarycreatinineisachemicalby-productgeneratedfrommusclemetabolismandisfrequentlyusedtoadjustforurineconcentration(ordilution)inspoturinesamplesbecauseitsproductionandexcretionarerelativelyconstantover24hoursduetohomeostaticcontrols.Ifthechemicalmeasuredbehavessimilarlytocreatinineinthekidney,itwillbefilteredatthesamerate.Thisexplainswhyexpressingthechemicalpergramofcreatininehelpscorrectfortheeffectofurinarydilutionaswellassomedifferencesinrenalfunctionandleanbodymass(RefertoHealthCanada’sReportonHumanBiomonitoringofEnvironmentalChemicalsinCanada7).

    Foranalyticalpurposes,theG.Mistakenintoaccountasanin-dicationofthetruecenterofthedistributionofresults.Thesechemicalsarefoundinthehumanbodyinverysmallquanti-tiesproducingaskeweddistributionwithverysmallvalues(

  • 22 national resultsnational results

    c h a p t e r s i xethical considerations

    Participationwasrandomforthisstudyandtheparticipantwasfreetowithdrawfromthestudyatanypointintimedur-ingtheprocess.Participantswereinformedoftheirrighttowithdrawbothverballyandinwriting.Priortoparticipating,volunteerswereprovidedwithfactsheets,andastep-by-steppamphletexplainingtheprocess.Iftheindividualwasinterest-edinparticipating,theysignedaconsentformtoconfirmtheirfreeandinformedparticipation.

    EachparticipantwasassignedanumericIDnumber.Alllabora-toryanalysisanddatamanagementdonebyeitherthelabora-tory,HCandStatisticsCanadawereconductedusingtheIDs.Therefore,noresultscouldbetracedbacktoanyindividualparticipant.ThecommunityquestionnaireswerealsocollectedusingthenumericIDnumbers.Furthermore,alldatabelongstothecommunityandanyfurtheruseofitbeyondthedevel-opmentoftheindividualcommunityreportsandthenationalreport,wouldneedtobeaccessedandauthorizedbythecom-munitiesthemselves.

    Thelaboratorythatconductedtheanalysisofblood/urinesignedaconfidentialitycontractwiththeAFNtoensurethatthesampleswouldbeproperlydestroyedafterbeingprocessedandthattheywouldnotbestoredforanyotherresearch(i.e.nobio-banking).

    Allinformationregardingsampling,questionnaire,andconsentformsiskeptanonymouslyinadatabaseattheAFN,groupedbyregions,andaccessiblebytheAFN-FNBIteam.Datawillonlybemadeavailableifpresentedinawaythatdoesnotpermitindividualorcommunityidentification,unlessotherwiseagreedbytheparticipants’permission.

    EthicsapprovalforallcomponentsoftheFNBIwasobtainedfromtheHealthCanada’sResearchEthicsBoard.Aswell,approvalfortheFNBIwasobtainedthroughanAssemblyofFirstNationsallchiefsresolution.EthicalconsiderationswerealsoaddressedthroughtheestablishmentofaFirstNations’PlanningandAdvisoryCommittee,developmentofindividualBandCouncilresolutionsandseparatecommunityresearchagreementswitheachinterestedcommunity,anddevelopmentofindividualconsentforms.

  • 23first nations biomonitoring initiative

    AnexpertworkshopwashostedbyHealthCanadain2003toprovidethebasisfortheCHMSCycle1chemicalselec-tion.Substanceswereselectedfromapreviouscandidatelistofover200individualchemicalcontaminantsorgroups.Thosethatwereselectedwerebasedonanumberofconsiderationsincluding:knownorsuspectedhealthrisks,levelofpubliccon-cern,evidenceofexposureintheCanadianpopulation,coststoperformthetest,andneworexistingrequirementsforpublichealthaction,etc.BasedonresultsfromquestionnairesthatweresenttoallFirstNationcommunitiesandtheadviceoftheFirstNationsPlanningandAdvisoryCommitteefortheFNBI,theCHMSCycle1suiteofchemicalswasselectedforinclusionintheFNBItoallowforcomparisonsbetweentheCanadianandFirstNationpopulations.Thesearelistedinthefollowingtable:

    ChemicalGroup NumberofSubstances Matrix

    TraceMetals (13)antimony,arsenic,cadmium,copper,lead,manganese,mer-cury,molybdenum,nickel,selenium,uranium,vanadium,zinc bloodandurine

    Polychlorinatedbiphenyls(PCBs) 24substancesandaroclor1260 plasma

    Polybrominateddiphenylethers(PBDEs) 10congeners plasma

    Organochlorinepesticides 14substances plasma

    Perfluorinatedcompounds(PFCs) 9substances plasma

    Environmentalphenol(BPA) 1substance urine

    Phthalates 11metabolites urine

    PesticidesOrganophosphatemetabolites(6),

    phenoxyherbicides(2),pyrethroidpesticides(5)urine

    Tobacco(cotinine) 1metabolite urine

    chemicals measuredc h a p t e r s e v e n

    8.HealthCanada(2010).ReportonHumanBiomonitoringofEnvironmentalChemicalsinCanada.ResultsoftheCanadianHealthMeasuresSurveyCycle1(2007-2009).(CHMSReport)Retrievedfromwww.healthcanada.gc.ca

    PleaserefertoAppendix6forthefulllistofchemicals.

    Regardingperfluorinatedcompounds(PFCs)measuredinplasma,theFNBIsampled9PFCs,whileCHMSmeasured3,thuscomparisonswereonlymadewiththe3in-commonPFCs:PerfluorooctaneSulfonate(PFOS),PerfluorooctanoicAcid(PFOA),andPerfluorohexaneSulfonate(PFHxS).

    InordertomaketheFNBIthemostcomparativepossibletoCHMS,themethodology,sampling,processingandlaboratory

    analysistechniqueswerereplicated.Therefore,bloodandurineweretheonlybiologicalspecimenscollected,asdescribedinthesamplecollectionprocedure(Appendix5).

    InformationaboutchemicalsinthisreporthasbeenadaptedfromHealthCanada’s(2010)“ReportonHumanBiomonitoringofEnvironmentalChemicalsinCanada.ResultsoftheCanadianHealthMeasuresSurveyCycle1(2007-2009)8.

  • 24 national resultsnational results

    8.1 antimony

    Antimony(Sb)isanaturallyoccurringelementwhichisreleasedintotheenvironmentprimarilythroughindustrialprocessesbutcanalsobefoundintheenvironmentnaturallyduetonaturalweatheringofrocks,runofffromsoils,emissionsfromvolcaniceruptions,seaspray,andforestfires.Itisreleasedintotheairasstackdustfromindustrialsources,suchascoal-firedpowerplants,inorganicchemicalplants,andmetalsmelterswhileitmayentertheaquaticenvironmentbywayofeffluentsfrommin-ingandmanufacturingoperations,andthroughindustrialandmunicipalleachatedischarges(HealthCanada,1997).

    Antimonyisusedinvarioussettings,mostfrequentlyintheproductionofsemi-conductors,infrareddetectors,anddiodes;itisusedasacomponentinalloysforbatteries,cablesheathing,plumbingsolder,ammunitionandfireworks,flameretardantandanti-frictionmaterials;andasanadditiveinpaintpigments,glass,andceramicproducts(HealthCanada,1997;NTP,2005;ATSDR,1992).

    FoodingestionisthemainrouteofexposuretoCanadiansbuttheycanalsobeexposedtoantimonyfromwater,air,dust,ordirectdermalcontactwithconsumerproductscontainingantimony(EURAR,2008).Theamountofantimonypresentinthebodyisgenerallylowforthosenotexposedoccupationally.Antimonyismostcommonlymeasuredinbloodandurine,asitwasdonefortheFNBI,andthismeasurementisreflectiveofexposuretoantimonyandantimony-relatedcompounds(ATSDR,1992).Somestudieshaveestimatedaneliminationhalf-lifeofapproximately95hoursafteranoccupationalexpo-surehasoccurred,(Kentneretal.,1995).

    8.1.1 FindingsAntimonywasmeasuredinurineoftheFNBIsampleandispresentedasμg/Lurineandμg/gcreatinine(Tables1.1–1.6).Urinaryantimonylevelscanprovidephysiciansandhealthofficialswithreferencerangesthatcanbeusedtodeterminewhetherpeoplehavebeenexposedtohigherlevelsofantimo-nythanarefoundinotherpopulations.Slightlyhighervaluesmaybeduetomethodologic,population,orexposurediffer-ences(CDC,2012).

    MeasurablelevelsofurinaryantimonyfoundintheFNpopula-tionreflectrecentexposure.Findingameasurableamountofantimonydoesnotnecessarilymeanthatanadversehealtheffectwilloccur.

    Levelsofurinaryantimonyreflectrecentexposure.Findingameasurableamountofantimonydoesnotnecessarilymeanthatanadversehealtheffectwilloccur.

    UrinaryantimonylevelsobservedintheFNBIsampleweresimilar(i.e.notsignificantlydifferent)tolevelsobservedintheCHMSsample.

    c h a p t e r e i g h tresults by chemical group metals and trace elements

  • 25first nations biomonitoring initiative

    table 1.1.

    antimony - arithmetic and geometric means of urine concentrations (µg/l) for on-reserve and crown land population aged 20 years old and older, Fnbi 2011

    Population Sex n %<LODA.M.95%CI

    G.M.95%CI

    10th95%CI

    25th95%CI

    50th95%CI

    75th95%CI

    90th95%CI

    95th95%CI

    ComparedtoCHMSG.M.

    FNBITotal

    Total 495 20.200.08E 0.05

  • 26 national results

    table 1.3

    antimony - arithmetic and geometric means of urine concentrations (µg/l) for on-reserve and crown land population aged 20 years old and older, Fnbi 2011 – ecozone by age distributionFNBI

    EcozoneAgegroup n

    %<LOD

    A.M.95%CI

    G.M.95%CI

    10th95%CI

    25th95%CI

    50th95%CI

    75th95%CI

    90th95%CI

    95th95%CI

    Total Total 495 20.20.08E 0.05

  • 27first nations biomonitoring initiative

    antimony - arithmetic and geometric means of urine concentrations (µg/l) for on-reserve and crown land population aged 20 years old and older, Fnbi 2011 – ecozone by age distributionFNBI

    EcozoneAgegroup n

    %<LOD

    A.M.95%CI

    G.M.95%CI

    10th95%CI

    25th95%CI

    50th95%CI

    75th95%CI

    90th95%CI

    95th95%CI

    Pacific 60-99 21 19.00.06 0.04

  • 28 national results

    antimony (creatinine adjusted) - arithmetic and geometric means of urine concentrations (µg/g) for on-reserve and crown land population aged 20 years old and older, Fnbi 2011 –ecozone by age distributionFNBI

    EcozoneAgegroup n

    %<LOD

    A.M.95%CI

    G.M.95%CI

    10th95%CI

    25th95%CI

    50th95%CI

    75th95%CI

    90th95%CI

    95th95%CI

    Boreal 40-59 62 30.60.07E 0.05E

  • 29first nations biomonitoring initiative

    table 1.5

    antimony - arithmetic and geometric means of urine concentrations (µg/l) for on-reserve and crown land population aged 20 years old and older, Fnbi 2011 –ecozone by gender distributionFNBI

    Ecozone Sex n%<LOD

    A.M.95%CI

    G.M.95%CI

    10th95%CI

    25th95%CI

    50th95%CI

    75th95%CI

    90th95%CI

    95th95%CI

    Total Total 495 20.20.08E 0.05

  • 30 national results

    table 1.6

    antimony (creatinine adjusted) - arithmetic and geometric means of urine concentrations (µg/g) for on-reserve and crown land population aged 20 years old and older, Fnbi 2011 – ecozones by gender distributionFNBI

    EcozoneSex n %<

    LODA.M.95%CI

    G.M.95%CI

    10th95%CI

    25th95%CI

    50th95%CI

    75th95%CI

    90th95%CI

    95th95%CI

    Total Total 495 20.20.08E 0.06

  • 31first nations biomonitoring initiative

    8.1.2 referencesATSDR(AgencyofToxicSubstancesandDiseaseRegistry).(1992).ToxicologicalProfileforAntimony.Retrievedfromwww.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp23.html

    CentersforDiseaseControlandPrevention(CDC).Fourth National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals. Updated Tables,2012.[online]AvailableatURL:http://www.cdc.gov/exposurereport/.10/1512

    CentersforDiseaseControlandPrevention(CDC).NationalBiomonitoringProgram.BiomonitoringsummaryforAntimony(2012).[online]AvailableatURL:http://www.cdc.gov/biomoni-toring/biomonitoring_summaries.html

    EURAR(EuropeanUnionRiskAssessmentReport).(2008).Draft:CAS:1309-64-4:DiantimonyTrioxide.Luxembourg:OfficeforOfficialPublicationsoftheEuropeanCommunities.Retrievedfromwww.ecb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/risk-assessment/

    HealthCanada.(1997).GuidelinesforCanadianDrinkingWaterQuality–SupportingDocument:Antimony.WaterQualityandHealthBureau,SafeEnvironmentsProgramme.Retrievedfromwww.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/pubs/water-eau/antimony-antimoine/index-eng.php

    HealthCanada(2010).ReportonHumanBiomonitoringofEnvironmentalChemicalsinCanada.ResultsoftheCanadianHealthMeasuresSurveyCycle1(2007-2009).Retrievedfromwww.healthcanada.gc.ca

    KentnerM.,LeinemannM.,Schaller,K.H.,Weltle,D.,&Lenert,G.(1995).Externalandinternalantimonyexposureinstarterbatteryproduction.InternationalArchivesofOccupationalandEnvironmentalHealth67,119–23.

    NTP(NationalToxicologyProgram).(2005).AntimonyTrioxide:BriefToxicologicalSummary.Retrievedfromwww.ntp.niehs.nih.gov/?objectid=7F90D949-F1F6-975E-7C681F79F29176F6#antimtriox

    WHO(WorldHealthOrganization).(2003).AntimonyinDrinking-water.Retrievedfromwww.who.int/water_sanita-tion_health/dwq/chemicals/0304_74/en/index.html

  • 32 national results

    8.2 arsenic

    Arsenic(As)isanaturallyoccurringelementwhichmayenterlakes,rivers,orgroundwaternaturally,whenmineraldepos-itsorrockscontainingarsenicdissolves.Theprimaryhumansourcesofarsenicreleasedtotheenvironmentarethesmelt-ingofmetalores(mainlygoldinCanada),theuseofarsenicalpesticides,andtheburningoffossilfuels(HC,2006).

    Arsenicwasusedinthepastbyapplyingleadarsenateasapesticideinappleorchardsandvineyards,andarsenictri-oxideasanherbicide(HealthCanada,2006;ATSDR,2007).Chromatedcopperarsenateisusedonlyforindustrialpurpos-esandfordomesticwoodfoundationsbutwasformerlyusedasawoodpreservativeinresidentialconstructionprojectssuchasplaygroundstructuresanddecks(PMRA,2005).Nowadays,itisusedinthemanufactureoftransistors,lasers,andsemi-conductors,andintheprocessingofglass,pigments,textiles,paper,metaladhesives,ceramics,woodpreservatives,ammunition,andexplosives.

    Themainsourceofarsenicintakeisthroughfood,mainlymeatandfish.Otherroutesofexposureincludedrinkingwater,soil,andambientair(EnvironmentCanada&HealthCanada,1993).Peoplelivinginthesurroundingareasofindustrialandgeologicalsourcesmaybemoreexposedtoarsenic,usuallythroughdrinkingwater.Higherlevelsofarseniccanbefoundingroundwaterthaninsurfacewater,whereitcanalsobefound.Somestudieshaveshownthatsmokersarealsoexposedtoarsenicincigarettes,althoughitisconsideredtobeofminorimportanceforarsenicabsorption(Schneider&Krivan,1993).

    8.2.1 FindingsArsenicwasmeasuredinbloodandurineoftheFNBIsampleandispresentedasμg/Lblood,μg/Lurineandμg/gcreatinine(Tables2.1–2.9).Arseniclevelscanprovidephysiciansandhealthofficialswithreferencerangesthatcanbeusedtode-terminewhetherpeoplehavebeenexposedtohigherlevelsofarsenicthanarefoundinotherpopulations.

    Levelsofbloodandurinaryarsenicreflectrecentexposure.Findingameasurableamountofarsenicdoesnotnecessarilymeanthatanadversehealtheffectwilloccur.

    BloodandurinaryarseniclevelsobservedintheFNBIsampleweresignificantlylowerthanlevelsobservedintheCHMSsample.

    Forbloodarsenic,whenobservingecozonetablesbyagedistribution(Table2.2),thePacificregiontotaland20-39yeargroupshavehigherlevelsthanthoseofthesameCHMSgroups.Thesamecanbeobservedintheecozonetablebygen-der(Table2.3)forurinaryarsenic(creatinineadjusted)forthe20-39agegroup.

  • 33first nations biomonitoring initiative

    table 2.1.

    arsenic - arithmetic and geometric means of blood concentrations (µg/l) for on-reserve and crown land population aged 20 years old and older, Fnbi 2011

    Population Sex n %<LODA.M.95%CI

    G.M.95%CI

    10th95%CI

    25th95%CI

    50th95%CI

    75th95%CI

    90th95%CI

    95th95%CI

    ComparedtoCHMSG.M.

    FNBITotal

    Total 473 15.600.84 0.49

  • 34 national results

    arsenic - arithmetic and geometric means of blood concentrations (µg/l) for on-reserve and crown land population aged 20 years old and older, Fnbi 2011 – ecozones by age distributionFNBI

    EcozoneAgegroup n

    %<LOD

    A.M.95%CI

    G.M.95%CI

    10th95%CI

    25th95%CI

    50th95%CI

    75th95%CI

    90th95%CI

    95th95%CI

    Boreal Total 52 30.30.48E 0.37E

  • 35first nations biomonitoring initiative

    table 2.3.

    arsenic - arithmetic and geometric means of blood concentrations (µg/l) for on-reserve and crown land population aged 20 years old and older, Fnbi 2011 – ecozones by gender distributionFNBI

    Ecozone Sex n%<LOD

    A.M.95%CI

    G.M.95%CI

    10th95%CI

    25th95%CI

    50th95%CI

    75th95%CI

    90th95%CI

    95th95%CI

    Total Total 473 15.60.84 0.49

  • 36 national results

    table 2.4.

    arsenic - arithmetic and geometric means of urine concentrations (µg/l) for on-reserve and crown land population aged 20 years old and older, Fnbi 2011

    Population Sex n %<LODA.M.95%CI

    G.M.95%CI

    10th95%CI

    25th95%CI

    50th95%CI

    75th95%CI

    90th95%CI

    95th95%CI

    ComparedtoCHMSG.M.

    FNBITotal

    Total 495 8.1011.63 4.47 F 2.21E 4.29 7.98 20.96 39.12

    ↓10.10-13.16 3.40-5.89 F 1.22-3.20 3.49-5.09 6.77-9.18 16.94-24.98 30.89-47.34

    F 302 8.9010.90 4.22 F 1.93E 4.04 7.90 20.78 42.47E

    ↓8.43-13.37 3.28-5.44 F 1.10-2.77 3.25-4.83 5.40-10.40 16.02-25.54 28.01-56.93

    M 193 6.7012.35 4.73 F 2.66E 4.38 8.03 20.47 38.38E

    ↓10.15-14.54 3.42-6.54 F 1.65-3.68 2.99-5.78 6.96-9.09 14.59-26.36 22.98-53.78

    CHMS

    Total 3474 0.1723.29 12.07 3.19 5.84 11.84 24.32 44.88 70.83

    17.98-28.59 10.11-14.4 2.9-3.48 5-6.69 9.3-14.37 18.84-29.79 37.6-52.16 51.03-90.63

    F 1842 0.1621.44 10.66 2.79 5.01 10.65 21.88 41.45 67.88

    16.47-26.4 9.06-12.54 2.34-3.24 4.24-5.79 8.64-12.66 18.11-25.64 33.6-49.29 47.31-88.46

    M 1632 0.1825.18 13.69 3.78 7.02 13.26 27.5 47.38 73.49

    18.71-31.65 11.24-16.69 3.37-4.19 5.71-8.34 9.8-16.72 20.51-34.49 37.06-57.71 50.98-96

    Note:If>40%ofsampleswerebelowLOD,thepercentiledistributionisreportedbutmeanswerenotcalculatedEmeansthatthesurveyestimatesshouldbeusedwithcaution.Theirassociatedcoefficientofvariationarebetween16.6%and33.3%Fmeansthatthesurveyestimatesweretoounreliabletobepublished.Theirassociatedcoefficientofvariationwereabove33.3%“-”or“.”meansthatthesurveyestimatesortheircoefficientofvariationcouldn’tbecalculated.

    table 2.5

    arsenic (creatinine adjusted) - arithmetic and geometric means of urine concentrations (µg/g) for on-reserve and crown land population aged 20 years old and older, Fnbi 2011

    Population Sex n %<LODA.M.95%CI

    G.M.95%CI

    10th95%CI

    25th95%CI

    50th95%CI

    75th95%CI

    90th95%CI

    95th95%CI

    ComparedtoCHMSG.M.

    FNBITotal

    Total 494 7.9010.25 5.02 1.85E 2.75 4.42 8.11 18.02 38.11E

    ↓8.81-11.70 3.94-6.40 1.13-2.58 2.10-3.40 3.63-5.21 7.01-9.21 15.07-20.98 24.26-51.96

    F 302 8.9012.38 5.73 2.23 3.10 4.90 9.24 21.61E 51.07E

    ↓9.34-15.42 4.50-7.29 1.62-2.85 2.46-3.74 3.81-5.99 7.62-10.86 8.46-34.76 25.66-76.47

    M 192 6.308.16 4.42 1.65E 2.44 3.77 7.11 17.52 20.24E

    ↓6.84-9.47 3.34-5.84 0.82-2.48 1.66-3.22 2.93-4.62 6.28-7.95 13.71-21.34 12.18-28.31

    CHMS

    Total 3465 0.1727.22 14.94 4.88 7.75 13.73 25.97 48.58 71.88

    18.56-35.89 11.97-18.65 3.9-5.86 6.16-9.35 10.62-16.85 20.01-31.93 34.76-62.4 46.33-97.42

    F 1839 0.1628.09 16.75 5.41 8.61 15.31 28.93 53.95 86.57

    20.52-35.65 13.32-21.06 4.33-6.5 6.67-10.55 11.78-18.84 20.62-37.25 38.44-69.45 54.73-118.4E

    M 1626 0.1826.34 13.30 4.5 7.04 11.97 22.83 41.69 63.56

    15.53-37.16 10.67-16.57 3.54-5.46 5.6-8.47 9-14.93 17.98-27.68 27.89-55.48 44.56-82.57

    Note:If>40%ofsampleswerebelowLOD,thepercentiledistributionisreportedbutmeanswerenotcalculatedEmeansthatthesurveyestimatesshouldbeusedwithcaution.Theirassociatedcoefficientofvariationarebetween16.6%and33.3%Fmeansthatthesurveyestimatesweretoounreliabletobepublished.Theirassociatedcoefficientofvariationwereabove33.3%“-”or“.”meansthatthesurveyestimatesortheircoefficientofvariationcouldn’tbecalculated.

  • 37first nations biomonitoring initiative

    table 2.6

    arsenic - arithmetic and geometric means of urine concentrations (µg/l) for on-reserve and crown land population aged 20 years old and older, Fnbi 2011 – ecozones by age distributionFNBI

    EcozoneAgegroup n

    %<LOD

    A.M.95%CI

    G.M.95%CI

    10th95%CI

    25th95%CI

    50th95%CI

    75th95%CI

    90th95%CI

    95th95%CI

    Total Total 495 8.111.63 4.47 F 2.21E 4.29 7.98 20.96 39.12

    10.10-13.16 3.40-5.89 F 1.22-3.20 3.49-5.09 6.77-9.18 16.94-24.98 30.89-47.34

    Total 20-39 203 10.810.61 4.40

  • 38 national results

    arsenic - arithmetic and geometric means of urine concentrations (µg/l) for on-reserve and crown land population aged 20 years old and older, Fnbi 2011 – ecozones by age distributionFNBI

    EcozoneAgegroup n

    %<LOD

    A.M.95%CI

    G.M.95%CI

    10th95%CI

    25th95%CI

    50th95%CI

    75th95%CI

    90th95%CI

    95th95%CI

    Pacific 60-99 21 0.051.26E 14.53E 1.05E 2.29E F F 137.20 .29.38-73.14 9.40-22.47 0.43-1.68 1.10-3.49 F F 127.02-147.39 .

    Prairies Total 82 36.6F F

  • 39first nations biomonitoring initiative

    arsenic (creatinine adjusted) - arithmetic and geometric means of urine concentrations (µg/g) for on-reserve and crown land population aged 20 years old and older, Fnbi 2011 – ecozones by age distributionFNBI

    EcozoneAgegroup n

    %<LOD

    A.M.95%CI

    G.M.95%CI

    10th95%CI

    25th95%CI

    50th95%CI

    75th95%CI

    90th95%CI

    95th95%CI

    Boreal 40-59 62 1.64.85 4.19 2.15 3.02 3.90 4.97 8.55 11.99

    4.22-5.48 3.77-4.65 1.61-2.69 2.25-3.80 3.45-4.35 3.83-6.11 5.85-11.24 8.78-15.20

    Boreal 60-99 19 5.35.63 4.93 2.31E 3.22 5.36 6.01 8.45E 10.35

    5.14-6.13 4.59-5.30 0.86-3.75 2.41-4.03 4.02-6.70 4.84-7.19 5.40-11.49 7.31-13.39

    GreatLakes Total 71 1.4

    7.22 4.97 2.16 2.78 3.61E 8.80 13.73 25.66E6.83-7.62 4.84-5.10 1.46-2.85 1.91-3.64 1.29-5.93 6.58-11.03 10.29-17.18 12.95-38.37

    GreatLakes 20-39 25 0.0

    8.53E 5.09 1.88 2.23 3.42 9.58E F .5.31-11.76 4.07-6.36 1.80-1.96 2.22-2.25 2.51-4.34 6.14-13.03 F .

    GreatLakes 40-59 33 3.0

    7.29 5.40 2.33 2.89 4.58 8.07 11.43 18.966.20-8.37 5.23-5.58 2.10-2.56 1.95-3.82 3.18-5.98 6.67-9.47 10.54-12.32 .-.

    GreatLakes 60-99 13 0.0

    4.51E 4.04E 2.49 3.35 3.37 4.50 8.05 9.711.90-7.11 2.69-6.07 2.45-2.52 3.35-3.36 2.38-4.35 3.14-5.86 6.36-9.75 .-.

    Pacific Total 98 3.135.31 17.23 3.57E 7.52E 15.40 41.73E 103.07 123.45

    27.99-42.63 12.52-23.71 2.25-4.89 4.68-10.37 10.55-20.26 15.77-67.69 99.93-106.21 106.40-140.50

    Pacific 20-39 25 0.042.04 20.40 3.24 11.95E 15.24 F 117.62 130.76

    33.16-50.92 18.40-22.61 2.25-4.22 4.43-19.47 13.53-16.96 F 104.90-130.34 123.51-138.00

    Pacific 40-59 52 5.829.92E 14.92E F 7.15 14.65E F 81.83E 101.49E13.46-46.39 8.02-27.74 F 4.93-9.36 5.40-23.89 F 34.67-129.00 60.45-142.52

    Pacific 60-99 21 0.028.71E 14.86E . 5.53 13.25E 45.02E 69.38E .17.07-40.35 8.96-24.62 . 4.17-6.90 8.17-18.33 19.35-70.70 42.89-95.87 .

    Prairies Total 82 36.6F F

  • 40 national results

    table 2.8

    arsenic - arithmetic and geometric means of urine concentrations (µg/l) for on-reserve and crown land population aged 20 years old and older, Fnbi 2011 – ecozones by gender distributionFNBI

    Ecozone Sex n%<LOD

    A.M.95%CI

    G.M.95%CI

    10th95%CI

    25th95%CI

    50th95%CI

    75th95%CI

    90th95%CI

    95th95%CI

    Total Total 495 8.111.63 4.47 F 2.21E 4.29 7.98 20.96 39.12

    10.10-13.16 3.40-5.89 F 1.22-3.20 3.49-5.09 6.77-9.18 16.94-24.98 30.89-47.34

    Total F 302 8.910.90 4.22 F 1.93E 4.04 7.90 20.78 42.47E

    8.43-13.37 3.28-5.44 F 1.10-2.77 3.25-4.83 5.40-10.40 16.02-25.54 28.01-56.93

    Total M 193 6.712.35 4.73 F 2.66E 4.38 8.03 20.47 38.38E

    10.15-14.54 3.42-6.54 F 1.65-3.68 2.99-5.78 6.96-9.09 14.59-26.36 22.98-53.78

    Atlantic Total 88 0.0F F F F F F 39.05 FF F F F F F 37.41-40.69 F

    Atlantic F 55 0.0F F F F F 23.24E 48.21 49.20EF F F F F 11.12-35.36 40.86-55.57 28.84-69.55

    Atlantic M 33 0.0F 6.85E 2.77 F 7.39E 11.36E 25.12E FF 3.64-12.90 2.08-3.45 F 3.96-10.82 4.71-18.00 15.56-34.68 F

    Boreal Total 156 3.84.69 3.34 0.83E 1.86E 3.50 5.65 8.80E 13.54E

    3.69-5.69 2.59-4.31 0.47-1.19 0.88-2.84 2.44-4.56 5.05-6.26 5.31-12.30 8.31-18.78

    Boreal F 92 4.34.14E 2.92E 0.79E 1.33E 2.86 4.93E 8.38E 11.27E2.47-5.82 2.09-4.09 0.50-1.07 0.54-2.11 1.96-3.75 2.93-6.93 3.73-13.04 4.39-18.14

    Boreal M 64 3.15.22 3.80 0.91E 2.40E 4.30 5.86 9.24 14.42

    4.82-5.61 3.17-4.55 0.38-1.43 1.24-3.56 4.06-4.54 5.32-6.40 7.88-10.61 12.77-16.06

    GreatLakes Total 71 1.4

    8.16 5.30 2.07 2.95 4.21 7.57 15.41E F5.73-10.60 4.79-5.87 1.52-2.61 2.74-3.16 4.16-4.26 6.66-8.48 8.69-22.13 F

    GreatLakes F 45 2.2

    7.56 5.40 1.88E 3.48 6.03 8.69 14.36 18.897.48-7.65 5.15-5.67 0.92-2.85 2.80-4.16 4.29-7.77 8.08-9.31 14.15-14.56 18.56-19.23

    GreatLakes M 26 0.0

    8.78E 5.20 2.09 2.91 4.14 6.20 F F4.01-13.54 4.10-6.58 2.08-2.10 2.56-3.26 2.93-5.34 4.72-7.68 F F

    Pacific Total 98 3.144.47 16.69 2.54 4.79 18.51E 40.18 119.99E 178.95

    36.31-52.63 14.51-19.19 1.87-3.21 4.17-5.40 11.03-26.00 32.32-48.04 69.59-170.39 168.50-189.39

    Pacific F 58 5.241.62E 18.56E 4.54 F 18.72E 50.70E 90.82 147.46E27.04-56.20 12.23-28.15 3.68-5.40 F 12.35-25.10 31.81-69.58 61.98-119.65 98.65-196.27

    Pacific M 40 0.047.31 15.01 2.39 3.55E 12.70 32.51E F 177.85

    34.67-59.95 11.68-19.30 2.24-2.55 1.60-5.49 9.37-16.03 20.25-44.77 F 157.64-198.05

    Prairies Total 82 36.6F F

  • 41first nations biomonitoring initiative

    table 2.9

    arsenic (creatinine adjusted) - arithmetic and geometric means of urine concentrations (µg/g) for on-reserve and crown land population aged 20 years old and older, Fnbi 2011 – ecozones by gender distributionFNBI

    Ecozone Sex n%<LOD

    A.M.95%CI

    G.M.95%CI

    10th95%CI

    25th95%CI

    50th95%CI

    75th95%CI

    90th95%CI

    95th95%CI

    Total Total 494 7.910.25 5.02 1.85E 2.75 4.42 8.11 18.02 38.11E

    8.81-11.70 3.94-6.40 1.13-2.58 2.10-3.40 3.63-5.21 7.01-9.21 15.07-20.98 24.26-51.96

    Total F 302 8.912.38 5.73 2.23 3.10 4.90 9.24 21.61E 51.07E

    9.34-15.42 4.50-7.29 1.62-2.85 2.46-3.74 3.81-5.99 7.62-10.86 8.46-34.76 25.66-76.47

    Total M 192 6.38.16 4.42 1.65E 2.44 3.77 7.11 17.52 20.24E

    6.84-9.47 3.34-5.84 0.82-2.48 1.66-3.22 2.93-4.62 6.28-7.95 13.71-21.34 12.18-28.31

    Atlantic Total 88 0.0F 6.54E F F 6.93E F F FF 3.91-10.93 F F 4.02-9.84 F F F

    Atlantic F 55 0.014.14E 9.50 2.72E 4.54E 9.90 17.74E 25.50 39.158.53-19.75 7.03-12.83 1.25-4.19 2.38-6.71 8.15-11.65 8.69-26.78 24.12-26.89 37.59-40.71

    Atlantic M 33 0.0F F 1.58 F F 11.32 F FF F 1.52-1.65 F F 7.85-14.79 F F

    Boreal Total 155 3.25.15 4.12 2.06 2.74 3.89 5.58 8.26 11.57E

    3.77-6.53 3.50-4.85 1.58-2.54 2.27-3.21 3.25-4.53 4.57-6.59 6.21-10.31 4.67-18.47

    Boreal F 92 4.36.04E 4.60 2.26 2.83 4.28 6.01 F F3.20-8.87 3.46-6.13 1.76-2.76 2.22-3.45 3.15-5.40 4.09-7.94 F F

    Boreal M 63 1.64.29 3.70 1.87 2.67 3.57 4.70 7.39 8.80E

    4.19-4.39 3.47-3.95 1.38-2.37 2.20-3.14 3.14-4.01 4.25-5.15 6.25-8.53 5.29-12.31

    GreatLakes Total 71 1.4

    7.22 4.97 2.16 2.78 3.61E 8.80 13.73 25.66E6.83-7.62 4.84-5.10 1.46-2.85 1.91-3.64 1.29-5.93 6.58-11.03 10.29-17.18 12.95-38.37

    GreatLakes F 45 2.2

    6.86E 5.62 2.32 F 4.73E 9.58 11.69 14.953.82-9.90 4.21-7.49 2.22-2.41 F 2.81-6.65 8.49-10.66 9.74-13.63 12.59-17.31

    GreatLakes M 26 0.0

    7.59E 4.38 1.91 2.49E 3.33 F F .4.03-11.16 3.22-5.96 1.82-2.01 1.43-3.55 2.70-3.96 F F .

    Pacific Total 98 3.135.31 17.23 3.57E 7.52E 15.40 41.73E 103.07 123.45

    27.99-42.63 12.52-23.71 2.25-4.89 4.68-10.37 10.55-20.26 15.77-67.69 99.93-106.21 106.40-140.50

    Pacific F 58 5.246.13E 21.10E 3.82 7.41E F 68.40E 123.04 140.2329.43-62.83 13.15-33.85 3.28-4.35 4.43-10.39 F 29.35-107.46 105.20-140.88 110.05-170.40

    Pacific M 40 0.024.52 14.07 F F 13.99 19.47 F .

    19.05-29.99 11.73-16.89 F F 11.79-16.19 18.19-20.74 F .

    Prairies Total 82 36.6F F

  • 42 national results

    8.2.2 referencesATSDR(AgencyforToxicSubstancesandDiseaseRegistry).(2007).ToxicologicalProfileforArsenic.Retrievedfromwww.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp2.html

    CentersforDiseaseControlandPrevention(CDC).NationalBiomonitoringProgram.BiomonitoringsummaryforArsenic(2012).[online]AvailableatURL:http://www.cdc.gov/biomoni-toring/biomonitoring_summaries.html

    EnvironmentCanada&HealthCanada.(1993).PrioritySubstancesListAssessmentReport:Arsenic.Ottawa:SupplyandServicesCanada.

    HealthCanada.(2006).GuidelinesforCanadianDrinkingWaterQuality:GuidelineTechnicalDocument–Arsenic.Ottawa:WaterQualityandHealthBureau,HealthyEnvironmentsandConsumerSafetyBranch,HealthCanada.Retrievedfromwww.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/pubs/water-eau/arsenic/index-eng.php

    HealthCanada(2010).ReportonHumanBiomonitoringofEnvironmentalChemicalsinCanada.ResultsoftheCanadianHealthMeasuresSurveyCycle1(2007-2009).Retrievedfromwww.healthcanada.gc.ca

    PMRA(PestManagementRegulatoryAgency).(2005).FactSheetonChromatedCopperArsenate(CCA)TreatedWood.HealthCanada.Retrievedfromwww.hc-sc.gc.ca/cps-spc/pubs/pest/_fact-fiche/cca-acc/index-eng.php

    Schneider,G.,&Krivan,V.(1993).Multi-elementanalysisofto-baccoandsmokecondensatebyinstrumentalneutronactiva-tionanalysisandatomicabsorptionspectrometry.InternationalJournalofEnvironmentalAnalyticalChemistry,53,87–100.

  • 43first nations biomonitoring initiative

    8.3 cadmium

    Cadmium(Cd)isanaturallyoccurringsoft,silverywhite,bluetingedmetalmainlyreleasedintotheenvironmentasaresultofhumanactivities.Itcanalsoentertheenvironmentasaresultofnaturalprocesses,includingforestfires,volcanicemissions,andweatheringofsoilandbedrock.Industrialbasemetalsmeltingandrefiningprocesses,andcombustionprocesses,suchascoal-firedelectricalplantsandwasteincinerationreleasescadmiumintotheatmosphereasaby-product(CCME,1996).

    Cadmiumisprimarilyusedinthemanufactureofnickel-cadmiumbatteries,inindustrialcoatingsandelectroplating,inpigments,andasaplasticstabilizerinPVCplasticsandispresentinmetalalloysheets,wires,rods,solders,andshieldsforvariousindustrialapplications(EnvironmentCanada&HealthCanada,1994).Itcanbefrequentlyfoundasanimpurityingalvanizedpipesandcanleachintodrinkingwater(HealthCanada,1986).SmokersareexposedtocadmiumviainhalationofcigarettesmokesincethetobaccoofonetypicalCanadiancigarettecontainsapproximately1μgofcadmium,ofwhich6–20%maybetransferredinmainstreamsmoke,basedonma-chinesmokedyields(Hammond&O’Connor,2008).Smoking20cigarettesperdaycanthereforeresultinanadditionaldailyexposureofapproximately1.2–4μgofcadmium.Themainex-posureofcadmiumfornon-smokersisthroughfood,althoughoccupationalexposurecanalsobeasignificantsource.

    QuebechasestablishedanOccupationalExposureGuidancevalueforCadmiuminBloodas5μg/L(44.49nmol/L)(INSPQ,2008).

    HealthCanadahasestablishedamaximumacceptableconcen-tration(MAC)of0.005mg/L(5μg/L)indrinkingwater(HealthCanada,1986).

    8.3.1 FindingsCadmiumwasmeasuredinbloodandurineoftheFNBIsam-pleandispresentedasμg/Lblood,μg/Lurineandμg/gcreati-nine(Tables3.1–3.9).Cadmiumlevelscanprovidephysiciansandhealthofficialswithreferencerangesthatcanbeusedtodeterminewhetherpeoplehavebeenexposedtohigherlevelsofcadmiumthanarefoundinotherpopulations.

    Levelsofbloodandurinarycadmiumreflectbothrecentandcumulativeexposure.Findingameasurableamountofcadmiumdoesnotnecessarilymeanthatanadversehealtheffectwilloccur.

    Bloodcadmiumlevelsobservedin(total,femaleandmale)theFNBIsampleweresignificantlyhigher(about2timeshigher)thanlevelsobservedintheCHMSsample.UrinarycadmiumlevelsseenintheFNBIsample(totalandfemale)weresignifi-cantlyhigher(about1.5-timeshigher)thanlevelsseenintheCHMSsample.

  • 44 national results

    table 3.1

    cadmium - arithmetic and geometric means of blood concentrations (µg/l) for on-reserve and crown land population aged 20 years old and older, Fnbi 2011

    Population Sex n %<LODA.M.95%CI

    G.M.95%CI

    10th95%CI

    25th95%CI

    50th95%CI

    75th95%CI

    90th95%CI

    95th95%CI

    ComparedtoCHMSG.M.

    FNBITotal

    Total 473 0.001.71 0.96 0.11E 0.35 1.40 2.53 3.85 4.65

    ↑1.49-1.92 0.84-1.10 0.06-0.16 0.28-0.42 1.02-1.78 2.22-2.83 3.43-4.26 4.02-5.28

    F 285 0.001.67 1.00 0.19E 0.41E 1.15E 2.48 3.83 4.65

    ↑1.33-2.02 0.80-1.25 0.12-0.26 0.26-0.57 0.58-1.73 2.05-2.91 3.16-4.51 4.08-5.21

    M 188 0.001.74 0.93 0.11 0.32E 1.49E 2.66 3.85 4.62

    ↑1.50-1.98 0.74-1.16 0.08-0.13 0.19-0.44 0.98-2.00 2.22-3.10 3.30-4.40 3.71-5.53

    CHMS

    Total 3463 1.010.87 0.42 0.12 0.19 0.34 0.78 2.77 3.8

    0.80-0.95 0.39-0.45 0.11-0.14 0.18-0.21 0.31-0.36 0.66-0.91 2.37-3.16 3.41-4.2

    F 1836 0.540.92 0.47 0.15 0.23 0.37 0.79 2.81 4.03

    0.83-1.00 0.44-0.51 0.13-0.16 0.21-0.25 0.33-0.41 0.66-0.92 2.4-3.22 3.47-4.59

    M 1627 1.540.82 0.38 0.11 0.16 0.28 0.76 2.61 3.73

    0.71-0.94 0.33-0.43 0.1-0.12 0.14-0.18 0.24-0.31 0.53-1 2.1-3.12 3.23-4.22

    Note:If>40%ofsampleswerebelowLOD,thepercentiledistributionisreportedbutmeanswerenotcalculatedEmeansthatthesurveyestimatesshouldbeusedwithcaution.Theirassociatedcoefficientofvariationarebetween16.6%and33.3%Fmeansthatthesurveyestimatesweretoounreliabletobepublished.Theirassociatedcoefficientofvariationwereabove33.3%“-”or“.”meansthatthesurveyestimatesortheircoefficientofvariationcouldn’tbecalculated.

    tables 3.2

    cadmium - arithmetic and geometric means of blood concentrations (µg/l) for on-reserve and crown land population aged 20 years old and older, Fnbi 2011 – ecozones by age distributionFNBI

    EcozoneAgegroup n

    %<LOD

    A.M.95%CI

    G.M.95%CI

    10th95%CI

    25th95%CI

    50th95%CI

    75th95%CI

    90th95%CI

    95th95%CI

    Total Total 473 0.01.71 0.96 0.11E 0.35 1.40 2.53 3.85 4.65

    1.49-1.92 0.84-1.10 0.06-0.16 0.28-0.42 1.02-1.78 2.22-2.83 3.43-4.26 4.02-5.28

    Total 20-39 187 0.01.96 1.24 F 0.60E 1.69 2.68 3.95 5.08

    1.69-2.24 0.99-1.56 F 0.40-0.81 1.42-1.96 2.41-2.96 3.17-4.73 4.03-6.14

    Total 40-59 206 0.01.70 0.95 F 0.32 1.38E 2.68 3.86 4.28

    1.26-2.14 0.78-1.17 F 0.28-0.36 0.62-2.13 1.82-3.53 3.22-4.51 3.45-5.11

    Total 60-99 80 0.00.85E 0.41E F F F F F 3.470.37-1.34 0.24-0.73 F F F F F 2.71-4.23

    Atlantic Total 78 0.01.88 1.27 0.27 0.50 1.76 2.40 3.74 4.52

    1.65-2.11 1.08-1.50 0.24-0.29 0.34-0.67 1.60-1.92 2.29-2.50 3.14-4.35 3.15-5.88

    Atlantic 20-39 24 0.02.18 1.68E 0.40E F 1.83 2.34 . .

    1.73-2.62 1.14-2.49 0.14-0.67 F 1.59-2.07 1.89-2.79 . .

    Atlantic 40-59 39 0.01.86 1.13 0.13E 0.36E 1.60 2.68 3.71 4.00

    1.52-2.20 1.05-1.23 0.06-0.19 0.20-0.53 1.17-2.04 2.07-3.28 2.80-4.62 3.83-4.17

    Atlantic 60-99 15 0.01.02E 0.75 0.29 0.32 0.68E F 1.84 2.960.44-1.60 0.61-0.92 .-. 0.29-0.36 0.35-1.00 F .-. .-.

  • 45first nations biomonitoring initiative

    cadmium - arithmetic and geometric means of blood concentrations (µg/l) for on-reserve and crown land population aged 20 years old and older, Fnbi 2011 – ecozones by age distributionFNBI

    EcozoneAgegroup n

    %<LOD

    A.M.95%CI

    G.M.95%CI

    10th95%CI

    25th95%CI

    50th95%CI

    75th95%CI

    90th95%CI

    95th95%CI

    Boreal Total 152 0.01.70 0.95 F 0.33E 1.36E 2.45 3.90 4.70

    1.32-2.08 0.76-1.18 F 0.12-0.55 0.88-1.84 2.09-2.81 2.88-4.92 3.71-5.69

    Boreal 20-39 73 0.02.05 1.47 0.41E F 1.81 2.53 4.01 5.13E

    1.71-2.39 1.21-1.80 0.17-0.65 F 1.53-2.08 2.18-2.88 2.78-5.24 3.37-6.89

    Boreal 40-59 60 0.01.50E 0.68E 0.08 0.19 F F 3.91 4.580.75-2.24 0.45-1.01 0.06-0.10 0.16-0.23 F F 3.32-4.50 3.59-5.57

    Boreal 60-99 19 0.00.67E 0.32E F F 0.21E 1.01E 2.02E 2.15E0.44-0.91 0.20-0.51 F F 0.10-0.33 0.37-1.64 1.28-2.76 1.41-2.89

    GreatLakes Total 70 0.0

    1.95 0.99 0.10 0.30 1.25E 3.43 4.66 5.371.62-2.28 0.95-1.03 0.10-0.11 0.23-0.37 0.76-1.73 3.15-3.71 3.77-5.55 5.25-5.49

    GreatLakes 20-39 24 0.0

    2.68E F 0.27 0.76E F 3.93E 5.37 5.641.50-3.86 F 0.26-0.28 0.37-1.15 F 2.15-5.70 .-. .-.

    GreatLakes 40-59 32 0.0

    2.02E 1.23 0.22 0.36E F F 3.75 4.030.78-3.26 1.18-1.29 0.20-0.24 0.23-0.50 F F 3.62-3.88 .-.

    GreatLakes 60-99 14 0.0

    F F . . F F 0.97E 1.09F F . . F F 0.35-1.59 .-.

    Pacific Total 96 0.01.28 0.69E 0.09E F F 2.12E 2.91 3.21

    0.87-1.68 0.40-1.17 0.06-0.11 F F 1.25-2.99 2.88-2.94 3.09-3.34

    Pacific 20-39 22 0.0F F . F F F 2.66E .F F . F F F 1.02-4.31 .

    Pacific 40-59 51 0.01.63 1.15 F 0.62E 1.34 2.53 3.09 3.25

    1.32-1.94 0.83-1.58 F 0.23-1.00 0.93-1.75 2.45-2.61 2.92-3.26 2.87-3.64

    Pacific 60-99 23 0.01.36 0.89 0.37E 0.41 0.63 2.04 3.49 .

    1.19-1.53 0.75-1.06 0.20-0.54 0.30-0.52 0.60-0.66 1.63-2.46 2.64-4.34 .

    Prairies Total 77 0.01.83 1.26 0.29E F 1.86 2.66 3.37 3.73

    1.38-2.29 0.94-1.71 0.18-0.39 F 1.46-2.25 1.87-3.45 2.93-3.80 3.25-4.21

    Prairies 20-39 44 0.01.80 1.26E F F F 2.65 3.31 3.42

    1.25-2.35 0.71-2.24 F F F 2.07-3.23 3.16-3.47 2.69-4.14

    Prairies 40-59 24 0.01.97E 1.56E 0.35 F F 2.60E 3.32E 3.770.94-3.01 0.94-2.60 .-. F F 1.58-3.61 1.88-4.77 .-.

    Prairies 60-99 9 0.0F F . 0.18E F F . .F F . 0.07-0.28 F F . .

    Note:If>40%ofsampleswerebelowLOD,thepercentiledistributionisreportedbutmeanswerenotcalculatedEmeansthatthesurveyestimatesshouldbeusedwithcaution.Theirassociatedcoefficientofvariationarebetween16.6%and33.3%Fmeansthatthesurveyestimatesweretoounreliabletobepublished.Theirassociatedcoefficientofvariationwereabove33.3%“-”or“.”meansthatthesurveyestimatesortheircoefficientofvariationcouldn’tbecalculated.

  • 46 national results

    table 3.3

    cadmium - arithmetic and geometric means of blood concentrations (µg/l) for on-reserve and crown land population aged 20 years old and older, Fnbi 2011 – ecozones by gender distributionFNBI

    Ecozone Sex n%<LOD

    A.M.95%CI

    G.M.95%CI

    10th95%CI

    25th95%CI

    50th95%CI

    75th95%CI

    90th95%CI

    95th95%CI

    Total Total 473 0.01.71 0.96 0.11E 0.35 1.40 2.53 3.85 4.65

    1.49-1.92 0.84-1.10 0.06-0.16 0.28-0.42 1.02-1.78 2.22-2.83 3.43-4.26 4.02-5.28

    Total F 285 0.01.67 1.00 0.19E 0.41E 1.15E 2.48 3.83 4.65

    1.33-2.02 0.80-1.25 0.12-0.26 0.26-0.57 0.58-1.73 2.05-2.91 3.16-4.51 4.08-5.21

    Total M 188 0.01.74 0.93 0.11 0.32E 1.49E 2.66 3.85 4.62

    1.50-1.98 0.74-1.16 0.08-0.13 0.19-0.44 0.98-2.00 2.22-3.10 3.30-4.40 3.71-5.53

    Atlantic Total 78 0.01.88 1.27 0.27 0.50 1.76 2.40 3.74 4.52

    1.65-2.11 1.08-1.50 0.24-0.29 0.34-0.67 1.60-1.92 2.29-2.50 3.14-4.35 3.15-5.88

    Atlantic F 47 0.02.03 1.31 F 0.50E 1.64 2.92 4.52E 4.65E

    1.84-2.22 1.12-1.53 F 0.29-0.72 1.16-2.13 2.03-3.81 2.81-6.22 3.04-6.27

    Atlantic M 31 0.01.73 1.24E F 0.39E 1.78E 2.19 3.30 3.40

    1.45-2.02 0.78-1.98 F 0.16-0.61 0.82-2.74 1.85-2.53 2.63-3.96 3.04-3.75

    Boreal Total 152 0.01.70 0.95 F 0.33E 1.36E 2.45 3.90 4.70

    1.32-2.08 0.76-1.18 F 0.12-0.55 0.88-1.84 2.09-2.81 2.88-4.92 3.71-5.69

    Boreal F 88 0.01.68 0.98 F 0.41E F 2.49 3.79 4.68

    1.21-2.15 0.74-1.30 F 0.20-0.63 F 1.97-3.00 2.62-4.96 3.71-5.65

    Boreal M 64 0.01.72 0.92 F 0.26E 1.42E 2.39E 3.89 4.56

    1.36-2.08 0.76-1.13 F 0.14-0.37 0.94-1.91 1.61-3.18 2.96-4.83 3.56-5.56

    GreatLakes Total 70 0.0

    1.95 0.99 0.10 0.30 1.25E 3.43 4.66 5.371.62-2.28 0.95-1.03 0.10-0.11 0.23-0.37 0.76-1.73 3.15-3.71 3.77-5.55 5.25-5.49

    GreatLakes F 4 0.0

    F F F F F 3.37E 3.99E 5.20EF F F F F 1.77-4.98 2.43-5.56 2.91-7.49

    GreatLakes M

    260.0

    2.15 F . F F F 4.67 5.31

    1.55-2.74 F . F F F 4.47-4.88 .-.

    Pacific Total 960.0

    0.0

    1.28 0.69E 0.09E F F 2.12E 2.91 3.21

    0.87-1.68 0.40-1.17 0.06-0.11 F F 1.25-2.99 2.88-2.94 3.09-3.34

    Pacific F 57 .01.13 0.67 . 0.23E 0.69 1.53 2.46 3.45

    0.92-1.35 0.55-0.82 . 0.11-0.35 0.57-0.80 1.33-1.73 1.85-3.08 2.75-4.16

    Pacific M 39 0.01.42E F . F F 2.65E 2.92 3.160.68-2.17 F . F F 1.31-3.99 2.88-2.96 3.06-3.26

    Prairies Total 77 0.01.83 1.26 0.29E F 1.86 2.66 3.37 3.73

    1.38-2.29 0.94-1.71 0.18-0.39 F 1.46-2.25 1.87-3.45 2.93-3.80 3.25-4.21

    Prairies F 9 0.02.03 1.54 0.35 F 2.06E 2.86 3.40 3.70

    1.45-2.61 1.11-2.14 0.31-0.40 F 1.32-2.79 2.10-3.62 3.09-3.72 3.34-4.05

    Prairies M28

    0.01.64E 1.03E F F 1.62E 2.30E 3.34 3.55

    0.99-2.29 0.57-1.89 F F 0.81-2.43 1.32-3.27 2.41-4.28 3.00-4.11

    Note:If>40%ofsampleswerebelowLOD,thepercentiledistributionisreportedbutmeanswerenotcalculatedEmeansthatthesurveyestimatesshouldbeusedwithcaution.Theirassociatedcoefficientofvariationarebetween16.6%and33.3%Fmeansthatthesurveyestimatesweretoounreliabletobepublished.Theirassociatedcoefficientofvariationwereabove33.3%“-”or“.”meansthatthesurveyestimatesortheircoefficientofvariationcouldn’tbecalculated.

  • 47first nations biomonitoring initiative

    table 3.4

    cadmium - arithmetic and geometric means of urine concentrations (µg/l) for on-reserve and crown land population aged 20 years old and older, Fnbi 2011

    Population Sex n %<LODA.M.95%CI

    G.M.95%CI

    10th95%CI

    25th95%CI

    50th95%CI

    75th95%CI

    90th95%CI

    95th95%CI

    ComparedtoCHMSG.M.

    FNBITotal

    Total 495 2.000.79 0.54 0.11E 0.33 0.61 1.02 1.61 2.07

    ↑0.72-0.86 0.47-0.63 0.05-0.17 0.27-0.39 0.54-0.67 0.94-1.11 1.44-1.78 1.81-2.33

    F 302 1.300.83 0.56 0.11E 0.31 0.60 1.08 1.74 2.23

    ↑0.76-0.90 0.49-0.64 0.05-0.17 0.26-0.37 0.53-0.67 0.96-1.20 1.64-1.83 1.99-2.47

    M 193 3.100.75 0.53 F 0.34 0.61 1.00 1.47 1.76

    -0.64-0.86 0.42-0.66 F 0.25-0.42 0.51-0.72 0.83-1.17 1.09-1.86 1.42-2.10

    CHMS

    Total 3474 8.000.60 0.37 0.1 0.21 0.41 0.74 1.31 1.76

    0.57-0.63 0.34-0.41 40%ofsampleswerebelowLOD,thepercentiledistributionisreportedbutmeanswerenotcalculatedEmeansthatthesurveyestimatesshouldbeusedwithcaution.Theirassociatedcoefficientofvariationarebetween16.6%and33.3%Fmeansthatthesurveyestimatesweretoounreliabletobepublished.Theirassociatedcoefficientofvariationwereabove33.3%“-”or“.”meansthatthesurveyestimatesortheircoefficientofvariationcouldn’tbecalculated.

  • 48 national results

    table 3.6

    cadmium - arithmetic and geometric means of urine concentrations (µg/l) for on-reserve and crown land population aged 20 years old and older, Fnbi 2011 – ecozones by age distributionFNBI

    EcozoneAgegroup n

    %<LOD

    A.M.95%CI

    G.M.95%CI

    10th95%CI

    25th95%CI

    50th95%CI

    75th95%CI

    90th95%CI

    95th95%CI

    Total Total 495 2.00.79 0.54 0.11E 0.33 0.61 1.02 1.61 2.07

    0.72-0.86 0.47-0.63 0.05-0.17 0.27-0.39 0.54-0.67 0.94-1.11 1.44-1.78 1.81-2.33

    Total 20-39 203 3.90.73 0.50 F 0.33 0.55 1.01 1.44 1.73

    0.61-0.84 0.40-0.62 F 0.27-0.38 0.50-0.61 0.80-1.21 1.11-1.76 1.45-2.01

    Total 40-59 213 0.90.86 0.59 F 0.36 0.67 1.07 1.79 2.57

    0.75-0.96 0.51-0.68 F 0.24-0.47 0.58-0.75 0.86-1.27 1.49-2.10 1.99-3.15

    Total 60-99 79 0.00.86 0.63 F 0.43 0.72 1.03 1.69 2.26

    0.79-0.94 0.52-0.76 F 0.30-0.56 0.60-0.85 0.94-1.13 1.51-1.88 1.83-2.68

    At