Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
First Generation Students: College Aspirations, Preparedness and
Challenges
Kara Balemian, Lead Research Statistician, Research
Jing Feng, Research Statistician II, Research
College Board AP Annual Conference
Las Vegas, NV
July 19, 2013
1
2 Presentation Title, Date here
With a quick show of hands, how many of you are…. => AP coordinators => Principals => Teachers => Counselors => Researchers
Who is in the Audience Today?
3 Presentation Title, Date here
Who are First-Generation Students?
• first person in the immediate family to attend college
• highest degree attained by either parent was a high school diploma or equivalent or less
• not to be confused with first generation immigration status
• can come from low-, middle- or higher-income families
3
4 Presentation Title, Date here
Why Do We Care About College?
• higher rates of employment and lifetime earnings
• higher levels of engagement in civic activities, such as voting and volunteering
• higher rates of living healthy lifestyles, including lower rates of smoking and obesity
• increased likelihood of engagement in educational activities with one’s children
(College Board, 2010)
4
5 Presentation Title, Date here
Why are We Looking at First-Generation Students?
• Unfortunately, first-generation students are underrepresented among college-going students
• A 2001 NCES study found that (Choy, 2001, p. xviii)
• while 82 percent of non-first-generation students enrolled in college immediately after finishing high school
• only 54 percent of students whose parents had completed high school did
• and only 36 percent of students whose parents had less than a high school diploma did
• Focus of new College Board president is increasing socioeconomic diversity at top colleges and expanding opportunity for all students
(http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/31/opinion/sunday/a-simple-way-to-send-poor-kids-to-top-colleges.html)
6 Presentation Title, Date here
Today’s Presentation Will…
• take a close look at first-generation test takers to better understand the needs and challenges they face on their path to college
• focus on college-bound test takers who took the AP and/or the SAT
• examine a variety of data elements including student socio-economic background, high-school characteristics, course-taking patterns, and college plans and aspirations
• provide insight into particular needs of first-generation students and offer recommendations
6
7 Presentation Title, Date here
Overview
I. What the Literature Says
II. Data and Methods
III. Overall Trends and Demographic Characteristics
IV. Academic Preparation and Exam Performance
V. School Characteristics
VI. College Aspirations and Planning
VII. Discussion
7
8 Presentation Title, Date here
I. What the Literature Says
8
Source: The Condition of Education 2012, NCES
--More than 1/3 of 5-17 year-olds in the U.S. are first-generation students --This rate is highest among underrepresented minority groups
Percentage Distribution of U.S. 5- to 17-Year-Olds by First-Generation Status and Race/Ethnicity, 2011
White 23
Asian 24
Multiracial 28
Black/ Af-Amer
41
Amer Indian/ AK Nat.
42
Native Haw/ Pac Islndr
50
Hispanic/ Latino
61
Total U.S. 34
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
10 Presentation Title, Date here
I. Literature Review First-generation students…. • disproportionately overrepresented among most disadvantaged groups (Engle, p.25)
• more likely to delay college entry, need remedial coursework, and drop out of college (Engle, p.25) • report lower educational expectations than their peers as early as 8th grade (Choy, 2001, p.xxiv)
• often begin college less academically prepared than other students (Choy, 2001, p.xxxi) • are less likely to take algebra, considered the “gateway” to advanced math courses in high school and associated with 4-year college enrollment (NCES, 2000, p.iv) • tend to know the least about the price of attending college (Choy, 2001, p.xxx) • are less likely to take college courses in academic areas such as mathematics, science, and computer science and more likely to focus on vocational/technical fields (NCES,2005, p.v-vi) • tend to apply to and attend less selective colleges that are closer to home (Engle, p.32)
• more likely to work while in college and live off campus, negatively affecting college academic and social integration outcomes (Saenz et al., 2007) • are not more likely to receive help from their schools in applying to colleges (Choy, 2001, p.xxix)
11 Presentation Title, Date here
II. Data and Methods
11
12 Presentation Title, Date here
II. Data and Methods
• Five years of graduating cohort data (2008-2012) • A cohort is a group of students belonging to a particular graduating class
• Data sample:
• U.S. test-takers only
• Analyses only include those test-takers who took the AP, SAT or both AP & SAT
• SAT analyses include test-takers who took either the SAT Reasoning or SAT Subject Test
• First-generation/non first-generation analyses only include those test-takers who answered the parental education questions on either the SAT or AP student questionnaire
• AP questionnaire responses used over SAT responses, where not missing
12
13 Presentation Title, Date here
III. Overall Trends and Demographic Characteristics
Test-takers from 2008 to 2012 cohort who took AP, SAT or both tests
14 Presentation Title, Date here
Test-taking patterns by region: average percent of test-takers across five cohorts
Western(e.g., AZ, CA, OR, WA): a higher percentage of test-takers who took both AP and SAT across regions (26.1%)
Middle States(e.g., DC, NY, NJ, PA): a higher percentage of test-takers who took SAT only across regions (31.5%)
Midwestern(e.g., IL, IN, IA): a higher percentage of test-takers who took AP only across regions (42.6%)
14
15 Presentation Title, Date here
Average percent of test-takers by regions and first-generation status across five cohorts 2008-2012
• A higher percent of test-takers in our sample were located in Middle States, Southern, and Western regions regardless of first-generation status.
15
16 Presentation Title, Date here
Percent of test-takers by test-taking patterns and first-generation status, 2008-2012 cohort
Non First-Generation
13.8 14.7 15.9 16.2 18.4
40.3 39.9 38.3 37.9 33.5
45.9 45.4 45.7 45.9 48.1
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
First-Generation
16.1 16.6 17.8 17.6 19.7
52.6 51.9 49.7 49.0 44.3
31.3 31.5 32.6 33.3 36.0
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
AP_only
SAT_only
Both
16
Non First-Generation: a higher percent of students who took “both” exams
First-Generation: a higher percent of students who took “SAT only”
17 Presentation Title, Date here
Percent of test-takers by gender and first-generation status, 2008-2012 cohort
Non-First-Generation First-Generation
17
52.5 52.3 52.2 52.1 52.447.5 47.7 47.8 47.9 47.6
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
A higher percent of test-takers were female regardless of first-generation status There was a larger gap between the percent of female and male test-takers among first-
generation students than non-first-generation students.
18 Presentation Title, Date here
Percent of test-takers by ethnicity and first-generation status, 2008-2012 cohort
Non-First-Generation
7.6 7.8 8.1 8.2 8.7
71.2 70.3 69.5 67.4 67.5
3.4 3.3 3.1 2.9 3.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 2.4 0.5 0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
First-Generation
8.2 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.4
15.5 16.1 16.4 16.4 16.0
23.6 24.9 26.4 27.6 29.6
48.1 46.3 44.5 42.1 41.0
3.2 3.1 3.0 2.9 3.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 2.0 0.6 0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
American Indian
Asian
African American
Hispanic
White
Other
No response
18
The first-generation test-takers were more represented by minorities In 2012 cohort, Hispanic test-takers accounted for nearly 30 percent of first-
generation test-takers.
19 Presentation Title, Date here
Percent of Test-Takers Using SAT or AP
Fee Waivers, 2008-2012 Cohorts
3236
4145
48
8 9 10 12 14
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
First-Generation
Non First-Generation
A significantly higher percent of first-generation test-takers used fee waivers than non first-generation test-takers
Regardless of first-generation status, percent of test-takers using SAT or AP fee waivers has been increasing since 2008
20 Presentation Title, Date here
IV. Academic Preparation and Exam Performance
20
21 Presentation Title, Date here
*Core includes test-takers who have taken four or more years of English, three or more years of mathematics, three or more years of natural sciences and three or more years of social sciences and history based on self-reported answers to the SATquestionnaire. --First-generation test-takers tend to have less core academic preparation than non first-generation test-takers.
Percent of Test-Takers with Core Academic Preparation, by First-Generation Status, 2012 Cohort
80
70
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2012
Non First-Generation
First-Generation
22 Presentation Title, Date here
*Advanced math here includes: Pre-calculus, Calculus, Trigonometry, and Statistics, including AP, honors or dual enrollment courses. --About 1/3 of first-generation test-takers reported taking Algebra in 8th grade compared to about 1/2 of non first-generation test-takers. --About 2/3 of first-generation test-takers reported taking advanced math courses compared to about 3/4 of non first-generation test-takers
Participation in 8th Grade Algebra and Advanced Math Courses, 2012 Cohort
34
47
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
First-Generation Non First-Generation
Percent of Test-Takers Taking Algebra I or Algebra II in 8th Grade
65
77
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
First-Generation Non First-Generation
Percent of Test-Takers Taking Advanced Math* During High School
23 Presentation Title, Date here
*AP STEMcourses include: Biology, Calculus AB, Calculus BC, Chemistry, Computer Science A, Environmental Science, Physics B, Physics C: Electricity and Magnetism, Physics C: Mechanics, and Statistics. --While AP participation among first-generation test-takers has been increasing over time, participation gaps between them and non first-generation test-takers remain persistent.
AP Participation, 2008-2012 Cohorts
60 60 62 62 67
47 48 50 51 56
0
20
40
60
80
100
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
AP Participation
35 35 36 36 39
21 21 22 23 24
0
20
40
60
80
100
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
AP STEM* Participation
Non First-Generation First-Generation
24 Presentation Title, Date here
* Performance indicates the percent of AP exam takers scoring 3 or higher on at least one AP exam during their high school career. **AP STEM courses include: Biology, Calculus AB, Calculus BC, Chemistry, Computer Science A, Environmental Science, Physics B, Physics C: Electricity and Magnetism, Physics C: Mechanics, and Statistics.
-- Performance gaps between first-generation and non first-generation test-takers have remained persistent over time.
AP Performance* Among AP Exam Takers, 2008-2012 Cohorts
69 69 69 69 70
49 48 48 48 48
0
20
40
60
80
100
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
AP Performance*
37 37 36 36 37
17 16 16 16 16
0
20
40
60
80
100
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
AP STEM** Performance*
Non First-Generation First-Generation
25 Presentation Title, Date here
--While the average number of AP exams taken by first-generation test-takers has been increasing over time, non first-generation test-takers generally take more exams per student.
Average Number of AP Exams Taken Per Test-Taker, 2008-2012 Cohorts
3.1 3.2 3.3 3.3 3.4
2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Non First-GenerationStudents
First-GenerationStudents
26 Presentation Title, Date here
--Average AP scores tend to be lower among first-generation test-takers. --Both groups take similar exams, with the exception of Spanish Language and Chemistry
Average AP Scores Across Most Popular Exams, 2012 Cohort
Non First-Generation Students
Exam Avg. Score 1. U.S. History 3.0 2. English Lang. & Comp. 3.2 3. English Lit. & Comp. 3.0 4. Calculus AB 3.1 5. U.S. Gov't & Politics 2.9 6. Psychology 3.4 7. Biology 3.0 8. World History 2.8 9. Statistics 3.0 10. Chemistry 3.0
First-Generation Students
Exam Avg. Score 1. English Lang & Comp. 2.4 2. U.S. History 2.2 3. English Lit & Comp. 2.3 4. Calculus AB 2.3 5. U.S. Gov't & Politics 2.1 6. Spanish Lang. 3.5 7. Psychology 2.6 8. World History 2.0 9. Biology 2.0 10. Statistics 2.2
27 Presentation Title, Date here
--While SAT scores for first-generation test-takers tend to be lower, scores among first-generation test-takers who took both AP and SAT scored higher than first-generation test-takers who the SAT only.
SAT Scores by First-Generation Status, 2008-2012 Cohorts
200300400500600700800
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
200300400500600700800
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
200300400500600700800
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012200300400500600700800
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
200300400500600700800
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012200300400500600700800
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Took Both AP & SAT Took SAT Only
SAT Critical Reading
Mean
SAT Math Mean
SAT Writing Mean
Non First-Generation First-Generation
28 Presentation Title, Date here
V. School Characteristics 2011 Cohort only
28
29 Presentation Title, Date here
* there are no first-generation and non first-generation schools per se * calculated count of AP and/or SAT test-takers by school * then calculated percent of these test-takers that were first and non first-generation * merged on school level NCES and AP course audit data * compared characteristics of majority (i.e., >=50%) first-generation vs. majority non first-generation test-taker schools * only included Public schools with 10 or more AP and/or SAT test-takers with parental education responses * only included 2011 cohort to due the availability of data
Method Used for School Characteristics Analyses
30 Presentation Title, Date here
Source: NCES common core of data tables Note: Percents include only those schools with 10 or more SAT and/or AP test-takers.
--Most schools with majority first-generation test-takers were public --Almost one-quarter of schools with majority non first-generation test-takers were private
School Type, 2011 Cohort
4 3
93
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
No Resp PRIVATE PUBLIC
Percent of Schools with Majority First-Generation Test-Takers (N=5,291)
7
24
69
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
No Resp PRIVATE PUBLIC
Percent of Schools with Majority Non First-Generation Test-Takers (N=10,458)
31 Presentation Title, Date here
Source: NCES common core of data tables Note: percents include only public schools with 10 or more SAT and/or AP test-takers.
--A larger percent of schools with majority first-generation test-takers were located in cities -- A larger percent of schools with majority non first-generation test-takers were located in suburban areas
School Locale, 2011 Cohort
37
21
12
31
City
Suburb
Town
Rural
Percent of Schools with Majority First-Generation Test-Takers (N=4,900)
17
32
17
34
City
Suburb
Town
Rural
Percent of Schools with Majority Non First-Generation Test-Takers (N=7,206)
32 Presentation Title, Date here
Source: NCES common core of data tables Note: Percents include only public schools with 10 or more SAT and/or AP test-takers.
--Schools with majority first-generation test-takers had significantly larger percentages of students eligible for free and/or reduced lunch.
Free and/or Reduced Lunch, 2011 Cohort
1 6
29
40
24
No Resp
0%-25% of StudentsQualify for FRL
26%-50% of StudentsQualify for FRL
51%-75% of StudentsQualify for FRL
76%-100% ofStudents Qualify forFRL
Percent of Schools with Majority First-Generation Test-Takers
(N=4,900)
1
43
44
11
1
No Resp
0%-25% of StudentsQualify for FRL
26%-50% of StudentsQualify for FRL
51%-75% of StudentsQualify for FRL
76%-100% ofStudents Qualify forFRL
Percent of Schools with Majority Non First-Generation Test-Takers
(N=7,206)
33 Presentation Title, Date here
Source: NCES common core of data tables Note: Percents include only public schools with 10 or more SAT and/or AP test-takers.
-- Larger percents of Title I and Schoolwide project schools among schools with majority first-generation test-takers, indicating student bodies with greater levels of economic and academic need.
Title I and Schoolwide Project Status, 2011 Cohort
77
23
0
Title I
Not Title I
N/A
Percent of Schools with Majority First-Generation Test-Takers (N=4,900)
44
56
1
Title I
Not Title I
N/A
Percent of Schools with Majority Non First-Generation Test-Takers (N=7,206 )
66
10
23 SWP
Not SWP
N/A
20
24 56
SWP
Not SWP
N/A
34 Presentation Title, Date here
Note: Percents include only public schools with 10 or more SAT and/or AP test-takers. --Schools with higher proportions of first-generation test-takers reported lower numbers of approved AP courses
Average Number of Approved AP Courses, 2011 Cohort
19
35
24 20
2 0 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
No Resp 0-5 6-10 11-20 21-30 31 orMore
Percent of Schools with Majority First-Generation Test-Takers (N=4,900)
9
25 23
34
9
0 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
No Resp 0-5 6-10 11-20 21-30 31 orMore
Percent of Schools with Majority Non First-Generation Test-Takers (N=7,206)
35 Presentation Title, Date here
Note: percents include only public schools with 10 or more SAT and/or AP test-takers.
--Schools with higher proportions of first-generation test-takers had lower numbers of approved AP STEM courses
Average Number of Approved AP STEM Courses, 2011 Cohort
19
72
9
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
No Resp 0-5 6-10
Percent of Schools with Majority First-Generation Test-Takers (N=4,900)
9
62
29
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
No Resp 0-5 6-10
Percent of Schools with Majority Non First-Generation Test-Takers(N=7,206)
36 Presentation Title, Date here
Source: NCES common core of data tables Note: Percents include only public schools with 10 or more SAT and/or AP test-takers.
--Schools with majority first-generation test-takers had higher proportions of Hispanic/Latino and Black/African-American students
Race/Ethnicity, 2011 Cohort
1
3
29
25
40
2 American Indian/AlaskaNativeAsian
Hispanic/Latino
Black/African-American
White
Two or More Races
Avg. Race/Ethnicity % Among Schools with Majority First-Generation Test-Takers (N=4,900)
1
4 10
10
73
2
American Indian/AlaskaNativeAsian
Hispanic/Latino
Black/African-American
White
Two or More Races
Avg. Race/Ethnicity % Among Schools with Majority Non First-Generation Test-Takers (N=7,206)
37 Presentation Title, Date here
VI. College Aspirations and Planning
Test-takers in five cohorts (2008-2012) who took both AP and SAT
37
38 Presentation Title, Date here
The following analysis will focus on…
Test-takers’ responses to SAT questionnaire regarding College Types
College Sectors
College Size(s)
College Setting(s)
College location
All women/men vs. Co-ed
Degree goals
Financial aid
Part-time job in college
First-year living in college
38
39 Presentation Title, Date here
What types of institution are you interested in attending? (check more than one response)
Percent of test-takers by first-generation status Non First-Generation First-Generation
39
83.0
90.2 91.688.4
85.3
4.2 4.7 4.9 4.8 4.91.6 1.7 2.1 2.6 2.5
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
85.087.7 88.4
85.783.0
9.5 10.4 10.6 10.3 10.2
2.7 2.9 3.4 3.8 3.60.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Four-year collegeor university
Two-yearcommunity orjunior college
Vocational/technical school
Undecided
There was a higher percent of test-takers planning to attend two-year community college among first-generation students than non-first-generation students.
40 Presentation Title, Date here
Public vs. Private? (check more than one response)
Percent of test-takers by first-generation status
Non First-Generation First-Generation
40
61.166.0 67.5
63.6 61.6
39.342.8
45.142.2 40.9
16.5 17.4 18.4 17.4 16.714.0 15.7 16.6 17.3 16.4
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
A higher percent of non-first-generation test-takers plans to go to private university/college than first-generation test-takers.
41 Presentation Title, Date here
What size college(s) are you thinking of attending? (check more than one response)
Percent of responses by first-generation status Non First-Generation First-Generation
41
Regardless of first-generation status, the larger percent of test-takers were thinking of attending an medium size college.
44.9 44.2 43.340.4 40.6
27.5 28.2 29.934.5 34.4
22.8 23.0 22.6 21.2 21.1
4.8 4.6 4.3 3.9 3.90.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
43.5 43.240.4 38.5 39.2
30.8 31.035.4
38.8 38.2
20.0 20.2 19.4 18.2 17.8
5.7 5.5 4.8 4.5 4.70.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Small(<2,000)
Medium(2,000-15,000)
Large(>15,000)
Undecided
42 Presentation Title, Date here
What college setting(s) do you prefer? (check more than one response)
Percent of test-takers by first-generation status Non First-Generation First-Generation
42
32.6 34.8 33.829.2 27.9
43.946.8 44.9
38.9 37.5
20.9 22.9 22.518.9 18.1
13.8 14.7 14.812.5 12.1
4.8 5.3 5.4 4.7 4.6
26.429.7
33.536.6 35.2
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
37.9 38.836.0
32.4 31.1
46.7 48.344.3
39.7 39.0
12.8 13.1 12.8 11.2 10.9
5.2 5.4 5.4 4.8 4.6
24.6 25.930.6 32.5 30.9
18.8 19.3 17.915.6 15.4
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Large city ormetropolitan area
Medium-size city
Small city or town
Suburbancommunity
Rural
Undecided
Regardless of first-generation status, the larger percent of test-takers prefer medium-size city, followed by large city; however, the proportion of “undecided” group has been increasing throughout the five cohort years.
A relatively larger portion of first-generation test-takers prefer to live in large city
compared to their non-first-generation counterparts.
43 Presentation Title, Date here
Where would you like to go to college? (check more than one response)
Percent of test-takers by first-generation status Non First-Generation First-Generation
43
15.6 16.7 16.8 15.4 14.9
42.145.5 47.1
43.5 41.9
25.327.6 29.1 27.1 26.4
4.2 4.8 4.8 4.5 4.4
22.324.7 26 27.3 26
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
A larger percent of first-generation test-takers would like to go to college “in my home state” or “close to home” than non first-generation test-takers.
44 Presentation Title, Date here
What type(s) of college are you considering? (check more than one response)
Percent of test-takers by first-generation status
Non First-Generation First-Generation
44
2.3 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.4
77.5
84.1 86.083.1
79.8
5.6 6.3 6.5 6.8 6.6
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Regardless of first-generation status, the majority of test-takers considered going to a coeducational college.
45 Presentation Title, Date here
What is the highest level of education you plan to complete beyond high school?
Percent of test-takers by first-generation status Non First-Generation First-Generation
45
Regardless of first-generation status, a higher percent of test-takers plan to complete master and beyond as the highest level of education.
33.4 33.1 32.9 32.4 32.827.4 27.8 28.9 28.9 29.0
20.0 20.217.1
14.3 13.718.3 18.1 20.3
23.4 23.6
0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.30.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
32.6 32.4 31.9 31.4 31.726.0 26.5 27.2 27.3 26.8
20.5 20.017.4 16.3 15.8
19.0 19.1 21.4 22.6 23.3
0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.50.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Less thanBachelor's
Bachelor's
Master's
Doctoral
Other
Undecided
46 Presentation Title, Date here
Do you plan to apply for financial aid at any college? Percent of test-takers by first-generation status
Non First-Generation
65.6 65.3 69.6 70.7 70.9
10.1 10.3 9.2 8.7 8.6
24.3 24.5 21.2 20.7 20.5
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
First-Generation
81.5 81.9 85.7 86.1 86.3
2.9 2.9 2.5 2.5 2.4
15.6 15.2 11.8 11.4 11.3
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Yes
No
I don't know
46
A higher percent of first-generation test-takers plans to apply for financial aid in college than non-first-generation test-takers.
47 Presentation Title, Date here
Do you plan to look for a part-time job while in college? Percent of test-takers by first-generation status
Non First-Generation
57.5 57.3 58.0 56.7 56.4
8.8 8.8 9.0 9.9 9.9
33.7 34.0 33.0 33.4 33.6
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
First-Generation
73.6 74.4 75.8 75.4 75.3
4.3 4.1 4.1 4.4 4.1
22.2 21.5 20.2 20.3 20.5
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Yes
No
I don't know
47
A substantially larger percent of first-generation test-takers plan to look for a part-time job while in college than non-first-generation test-takers.
48 Presentation Title, Date here
What language do you know best? Average percent of test-takers by first-generation status
Non First-Generation
91.6 91.3 91.1 90.6 90.6
7.1 7.4 7.6 8.1 8.1
1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.2 0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
First-Generation
75.1 74.0 72.9 71.6 71.0
22.1 23.2 24.3 25.6 26.3
2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.7 0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
English only
English and other
Another language
48
A substantially larger percent of first-generation test-takers speak English and/or other languages than non-first-generation test-takers.
49 Presentation Title, Date here
Institutions that were listed among the top 10 places test takers sent their SAT scores to, across five cohorts
(Non First-Generation) Comparison by institutions
CA MA NY NC PA
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES
BOSTON UNIVERSITY
CORNELL UNIVERSITY
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH
CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
UNDERGRADUATE ADMISSION
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY
HARVARD UNDERGRADUATE
ADMISSIONS
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY PENNSYLVANIA
STATE UNIVERSITY
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY
UNDERGRADUATE ADMISSIONS
STANFORD UNIVERSITY
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE
49
50 Presentation Title, Date here
Institutions that were listed among the top 10 places test takers sent their SAT scores to, across five cohorts
(First-Generation) Comparison by institutions
CA FL NY TX
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES UNIVERSITY CENTRAL FLORIDA
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY MENTOR
50
51 Presentation Title, Date here
Where do you plan to live during your first year in college? Percent of test-takers by first-generation status
Non First-Generation
5.3 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.5
69.0 69.0 72.5 73.2 73.4
2.2 2.1 2.1 2.3 2.3
23.6 23.7 20.2 19.2 18.8
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
First-Generation
14.1 14.3 14.4 14.5 14.5
48.6 49.0 52.8 53.5 53.9
4.6 4.4 4.7 5.0 5.1
32.7 32.3 28.1 27.1 26.5
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
At home
On-campus Housing
Off-campus housing
I don't know
51
A larger percent of first-generation test-takers plan to live at home than their non first-generation counterparts.
A substantially larger percent of non-first-generation test-takers plan to live on campus than their first-generation counterparts.
52 Presentation Title, Date here
Top 10 Intended Majors, 2012 Cohort
Rank Took Both AP & SAT, Non
First-Generation Took Both AP & SAT, First-
Generation Took SAT Only, Non First-
Generation Took SAT Only, First-
Generation
1 Health Professions And Related Programs
Health Professions And Related Programs
Health Professions And Related Programs
Health Professions And Related Programs
2 Engineering No Response No Response No Response
3
Business Management, Marketing, And Related Support Services
Business Management, Marketing, And Related Support Services
Business Management, Marketing, And Related Support Services
Business Management, Marketing, And Related Support Services
4 Biological And Biomedical Sciences Engineering Visual And Performing Arts Visual And Performing Arts
5 Undecided Biological And Biomedical Sciences Engineering Education
6 No Response Visual And Performing Arts Undecided Psychology
7 Visual And Performing Arts Psychology Education Engineering
8 Psychology Undecided Biological And Biomedical Sciences
Homeland Security, Law Enforcement, Firefighting And Related Protective Services
9 Education Education Psychology Undecided
10 Communication, Journalism, And Related Programs Legal Professions And Studies
Homeland Security, Law Enforcement, Firefighting And Related Protective Services
Biological And Biomedical Sciences
Note: Students who took AP only are not included because they did not complete the SAT questionnaire which captures intended major responses.
53 Presentation Title, Date here
VII. Discussion
53
54 Presentation Title, Date here
-- “While students whose parents have a college education tend to experience ‘college as a continuation’ of their academic and social experiences in high school, going to college often constitutes a ‘disjunction’ in the lives of first-generation students and their families,” (Engle, p.33) -- first-generation students “often lack important ‘college knowledge’ about the process of preparing, applying, and paying for college due to the lack of experience with postsecondary education in their families,”(Hossler et al., 1999). -- not being able to benefit from their parents’ experiences puts them at a distinct disadvantage (NCES, 2000) -- areas where we can make a difference (Engle, pp. 38-40)… * improve pre-college preparation: help students plan a rigorous curriculum which includes advanced math and counseling on “gateway courses” * help students form early aspirations and plans for college * increase information about and access to financial aid resources to help reduce barriers to college enrollment * ease the transition to college by increasing students’ exposure to the college environment
Areas of Intervention
55 Presentation Title, Date here
* There are a growing number of college access and success programs across the country that target low-income, minority, and first-generation test-takers (Engle, p. 33) * the most well-known and long-standing are the federally-funded TRIO and GEAR UP programs (Engle, p. 33). * Other programs include the Talent Search, Upward Bound, Student Support Services, and McNair Scholars programs * these programs provide services that aim to increase college awareness and preparation, counseling, tutoring, mentoring, and information regarding the college admissions process * evaluation data of these programs have generally demonstrated a positive impact on the educational outcomes of low-income and first-generation test-takers (Engle, p. 33)
Intervention Programs for First-Generation Students
56 Presentation Title, Date here
Source: http://studentnpc.collegeboard.org/what-is-a-net-price-calculator The net price calculator is a tool that you can use to estimate your “net price” to attend a particular college or university. Net price is the difference between the “sticker” price (full cost) to attend a specific college, minus any grants and scholarships for which you may be eligible. Sticker price includes direct charges (tuition and fees, room and board) and indirect costs (books and supplies, transportation and personal expenses). How does it work? 1. First, the net price calculator looks at the sticker price. 2. Then, using the financial information you enter into the calculator, the net price calculator estimates the amount of money your family would be expected to contribute to pay for college. 3. Finally, the net price calculator evaluates your eligibility for financial aid at specific colleges by matching your financial and personal characteristics to the criteria that schools use to distribute financial aid (need-based grants as well as merit-based scholarships). How can the net price calculator help me? 1. Net price is the key to understanding what a specific college is likely to cost, and allows you to better compare your out-of-pocket expenses from one college to another. 2. It can help you widen your college choices beyond those institutions that you think you can afford. It is possible that your net cost will be lower at a college with a high sticker price or higher at a college with a lower sticker price. You may find that some colleges you thought were financially out of your reach may be very affordable. 3. Remember, “financial fit” is just one of many factors you will want to consider in choosing a college.
Net Price Calculator
College Board Links
•www.collegeboard.org/research •http://studentnpc.collegeboard.org/what-is-a-net-price-calculator •https://bigfuture.collegeboard.org/ •http://professionals.collegeboard.com/guidance/prepare/first-generation
57
58 Presentation Title, Date here
Questions……
59 Presentation Title, Date here
Bibliography Chen, X. First-Generation Students in Postsecondary Education: A Look at their College Transcripts. Washington, DC: National Center for
Education Statistics. 2005.
Choy, S. Students Whose Parents Did Not Go to College: Postsecondary Access, Persistence, and Attainment. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. 2001.
College Board. Education Pays 2010: The Benefits of Higher Education for Individuals and Society. New York: The College Board. 2010.
Engle, Jennifer. “Postsecondary Access and Success for First-Generation College Students.” American Academic, Vol. 3. 2007.
Hossler, D., J. Schmit, and N. Vesper. Going to College: How Social, Economic, and Educational Factors Influence the Decisions Students Make. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press. 1999.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). Condition of Education, 2012. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. 2012.
Nunez, A. and S. Cuccaro-Alamin. First-Generation Students: Undergraduates Whose Parents Never Enrolled in Postsecondary Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. 1998.
Saenz, V. B., Hurtado, S., Barrera, D., Wolf, D., Yeung, F. First in My Family: A Profile of First-Generation College Students at Four-Year Institutions Since 1971. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute. 2007.
Snyder, T.D., and Dillow, S.A. Digest of Education Statistics 2009 (NCES 2010-013). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC. 2010.
59
Researchers are encouraged to freely express their professional judgment. Therefore, points of view or opinions stated in College Board presentations
do not necessarily represent official College Board position or policy.
Please forward any questions, comments, and suggestions to:
[email protected] [email protected]
Thank You!
60