FIR No. 127/15 PS : GK (EOW) State Vs. Harmeet Singh …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...FIR No. 127/15 PS : GK (EOW) State Vs. Harmeet Singh Sood 24.06.2016

FIR No. 127/15PS : GK (EOW)State Vs. Harmeet Singh Sood

24.06.2016

An application for bail u/s 437 Cr.PC.

Present: Ld. APP for the State.

IO Inspector Samarpal Singh in person.

Sh. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Ld counsel for applicant.

IO has filed reply of this bail application. It is mentioned in

the reply that accused persons has six previous involvements and copy of

the same is enclosed with the reply.

Perused. Copy of previous involvement is not enclosed with

the report.

Part arguments heard.

Notice to the complainant through IO be issued for 30.06.2016

at 2.00 pm. IO is directed to file enclosure as mentioned in the reply of the

bail application NDOH.

(SATISH KUMAR ARORA) CMM/SE/Saket Courts New Delhi/24.06.2016

MCA No. 17/16PNB Vs. KDM Services Providers Pvt Ltd

24.06.2016

File put up today on an application for necessary directions to the Court

appointed Receiver for executing order dated 09.03.2016, as filed on behalf

of the applicant/petitioner bank on 10.06.2016.

Present: Sh. Rambir Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant bank.

Heard and perused.

Let notice of this application be issued to the Receiver for

consideration on 07.07.2016 at 2.00 pm.

Ld counsel for the applicant has also been apprised that the

Court appointed Receiver has filed his report in the matter with this Court

on dated 23.06.2016. Applicant/petitioner bank is at liberty to take

certified copy thereof from the Court as necessary reference.


MCA No. 07/16PNB Vs. M/s Circular Jute Mills

24.06.2016

Present: Sh. Vishwabandu R Nath, Chief Manager of the petitioner

bank with Ld counsel Sh. S K Tanwar.

Sh. Shankar Chhabra, Court appointed Receiver in person.

Summons to Chief Manager of the petitioner bank and to its

counsel returned back served.

It is submitted by Ld counsel for the petitioner bank that the

matter is pending before DRT and the next date thereof is 07.07.2016.

Be put up for purposes fixed for 16.07.2016 at 2.00 pm.


FIR No. 504/06PS : CR Park State Vs. Untrace

24.06.2016


Complainant Jugal Kishore Ranjan with Ld counsel Sh.

Gautam Chakraverty.

IO SI Abhishek Kumar from EOW in person.

IO has today supplied copy of untrace report to the

complainant against due acknowledgment.

Complainant has filed a written complaint.

Be put up for consideration on the untrace report as well as

on the complaint filed by the complainant on 10.08.2016 at 2.00 pm.


Vehicle No. HR 73 1216Circle : STA State Vs. Sunder Gautam

24.06.2016


Sh. Kailash Bhardwaj, Ld counsel for the applicant.

This is an application for preponment of date of hearing for

disposal of the challan. Heard and perused.

Let record/file be positively called from the concerned Court

for 25.06.2016.


Vehicle No. HR38U0962 Circle : STA State Vs. Ombir

24.06.2016


Sh. Ashok Kumar, Ld counsel for the applicant.

This is an application for release of vehicle bearing no.

HR38U0962 on superdari.

Let record be positively called from the concerned Court for

25.06.2016.


FIR No. 197/16PS : GKIState Vs. Sagar Saini

24.06.2016


ASI Vijaypal Chuahan in person.

Prosecutrix Ms. Shaloni in person.

Order of even date passed by Ld MM is perused.

File be sent back to the Court of Ld MM Sh. Sudhir Kumar

Sirohi for recording of statement of Prosecutrix Ms. Shaloni u/s 164 Cr.PC

for today itself at 2.45 pm.


FIR No. 22/13PS : Badarpur State Vs. Rakesh Sharma

24.06.2016


Order dated 23.05.2016 passed by Ld MM and DD No. 53B

dated 08.01.2016 PS Badarpur are perused.

Accordingly, file be sent back to the Court of Ld MM Ms.

Shivani Chauhan for 27.06.2016.


FIR No. 70/11PS : Crime Branch South East State Vs. Raj Narayan Tiwari & Ors

24.06.2016


Accused Raj Narayan Tiwari, Pankaj Madhesia and Rajiv

Kumar in person.

Sh. Manoj Kumar, surety of accused Raj Narayan Tiwari in

person.

Matter today is listed for S/D and consideration on charge. A

handwritten application has been filed by surety Manoj for withdrawal of

his surety bonds for accused R N Tiwari. Accused has sought time to

arrange for another surety. Accordingly, application is kept pending

disposal for NDOH.

Notice to IO/IOs be issued for consideration on charge for

28.07.2016.


FIR No. 1013/15PS : Amar ColonyState Vs. Hemant

24.06.2016


Accused Hemant in person.

IO HC Yogender Singh in person.

IO has filed previous conviction record of the accused. Report

perused and considered. In the report it has been submitted that accused

has not previously convicted for the same offence.

Matter is otherwise at the stage of report on the summons.

Summons to accused received served. Accused is present in person and has

filed an application u/s 265B Cr.PC with his supporting affidavit for

referring the matter to plea bargaining. Heard and perused.

The application with the file is assigned to Ld MM Sh. Arvind

Bansal for disposal for today itself at 2.00 pm.

IO shall remain present before the Ld Plea Bargaining Judge


FIR No. 515/15PS : HN Din State Vs. Kajal Suri

24.06.2016


Accused Kajal Suri in person.

Matter is today listed for report on the summons. Summons

not received back, however, accused is present in person and has filed an

application u/s 265B Cr.PC with her supporting affidavit and copy of her

voter ID Card for referring the matter to plea bargaining. Heard and

perused.

The application with the file is assigned to Ld MM Sh. Arvind

Bansal for disposal for 04.07.2016 at 2.00 pm.

Notice to IO be issued to remain present with previous

conviction record of the accused before the Ld Plea Bargaining Judge on

the date and time fixed.


CC No. 26/01/16In FIR No. 91/00PS : CR Park Rajender Kumar Vs. Amit Benerjee & Ors

24.06.2016

Present: Complainant Rajender Kumar with Ld counsel Sh. Sandeep

Sehgal.

Sh. Shivek Trehan, Ld counsel for the applicant (application

u/s 340 Cr.PC).

Ld counsel for the applicant is heard on the application u/s

340 Cr.PC.

Ld counsel for the complainant is partly heard on the aspect

of summoning.

Be put up for further arguments on summoning and

clarifications, if any/order on the application u/s 340 Cr.PC for 26.07.2016.


FIR No. 241/08PS : Sarita ViharState Vs. Ramesh etc

24.06.2016


Accused Ramesh with Ld counsel Sh. Subodh Kumar.

Accused Wakir Khan with Ld counsel Sh. Tejveer Singh.

Accused Ashfak in person.

PW SI Rajender has again sent his request to the summons

served upon him. Fresh summons be issued to him with directions to

remain present on NDOH with his medical certificate failing which to

deposit cost of Rs. 5,000/.

Summons to PW ASI Devender returned with the report of

his death. Copy of his death certificate is annexed with the report. His

name accordingly deleted from the list of witnesses.

PW Ct. Devender has sent his request to the summons served

upon him.

No other PW is present/summoned.

Let material witnesses including PW S Thomas and PW SI

Rajender Singh be summoned through DCP Crime Branch for PE on

06.08.2016.


FIR No. 7/15PS : Amar Colony (AATS)State Vs. Irfan @ Chenu

24.06.2016


Accused Irfan @ Chenu not produced from JC in video

conferencing.

Sh. Gautam Chakraverty, Ld LAC for accused.

PW Ct. Kuldeep has sent his request. PW Ct. Sanjay is

discharged unexamined as accused is not produced in VC owing to his

illness.

Matter is adjourned for PE on 11.07.2016.

Intimation of NDOH be sent to the concerned Jail

Superintendent to ensure the presence of accused in VC.


CC No. 51/01/13 State Vs. Rekha

24062016

Present: Learned APP for the State.

Accused Rekha absent.

Ld. Proxy Counsel for accused.

An application seeking exemption from personal appearance

of the accused Rekha is filed. Heard and perused. Allowed for today only.

Be put up for purposes fixed for 11.08.2016.

(SATISH KUMAR ARORA) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/24062016

FIR No. 439/07 PS KalkajiState Vs. Nadeem

24062016


Accused Nadeem from JC.

Accused Gaurav and Shahana in person

Sh. Hari Shankar, Ld. Counsel for the accused Nadeem and

Shahana.

Notice to IO not received back. Be issued afresh in terms of

previous order for 08.07.2016.



FIR No. 270/10 PS Crime Branch (South Delhi)State Vs. A.S. Arora

24062016


Sh. M. Hasibuddin, Ld. Counsel for some of the affected

parties.

Proceedings qua accused Lajpat Rai already abated.

Accused A.S. Arora, Kiran, Heena, Deepak, Rajo Devi,

Gulshan Rai are present.

Accused Devender Bhateja @ Monu (of supplementary charge

sheet) present in person.

Accused Ved Prakash Manchanda and Gaurav Manchanda

with Ld. Counsel Sh. Jitender Tyagi.

Sh. Mobin Akhtar, Ld. Counsel for the accuse Dheeraj Arora

(of supplementary charge sheet) who is absent today.

Sh. Gautam Chakraverty, Ld. LAC for accused A.S. Arora.


of the accused Dheeraj Arora with V/n is filed. Heard and perused. Allowed

for today only.

Summons to accused Ved Prakash Manchanda, Gaurav

Manchanda, Devender Bhateja and Dheeraj Arora (all of supplementary

challan) returned served.

IO / SI Arun Verma has sent his request seeking exemption

from personal appearance for today.

Cont......P2


:2:

Matter is adjourned for supplying of copies of charge sheet

and for bail proceedings of above noted four accused persons for

08.08.2016.

Five separate applications with V/N on behalf of five investors

/ applicant seeking direction to the IO to dispose off the property seized in

the matter. Let notice of the same be issued to the IO to remain present

with his reply / report on the date fixed i.e. 08.08.2016.




24062016


Proceedings qua accused Lajpat Rai (A2) already abated.

Accused A.S. Arora (A1), Kiran (A3) and Subhash Arora

(A4) in person.

Accused No. 5 is Anand Jan Sewa Society.

Sh. Gautam Chakraverty, Ld. LAC for accused A.S. Arora.

IO / SI S.K. Jha is present upon service of notice. He is bound

down for purposes fixed with connected matter for 08.08.2016.



FIR No. 358/07 PS New Friends Colony State Vs. Harjit Singh Maini

24062016


Accused Harjit Singh Maini, Ravinder Nath @ Ravi Kumar

and Abid Ali are present on Court Bail with their Ld. Counsel

Sh. H.S. Gill.

Sh. Dhananjay Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the LR's of the

complainant.

Accused Raj Kumar is PO.

IO / Inspector Anil Yadav has sent his request seeking

exemption from personal appearance for today.

Notice to complainant Parvinder Pal Singh returned unserved

with the report of his death. Copy of his death certificate annexed with the

report.

Summons to accused and notice to their sureties returned

served. V/Ns for the accused are filed.

Time sought to file V/N for the LR's of deceased /

complainant. Let it be filed on or before the NDOH.

Notice to IO be issued to remain present for supplying copies

to accused persons for 18.07.2016.



FIR No. 108/14 PS Ambedkar Nagar State Vs. Ali @ Mehboob & Ors.

24062016


IO / HC Praveen is absent despite service and calls. B/Ws in

the sum of Rs. 5,000/ be issued against him for purposes fixed for

06.08.2016.



FIR No. 1272/15 PS Jamia NagarState Vs. Birender

24062016


Accused Birender present upon service of summons with IO /

HC Vinod Kumar.

An application u/s 265B Cr.P.C. with supporting affidavit of

the accused for plea bargaining is filed by the accused. Heard. The

application with the file is assigned for disposal to Ld. MM, Sh. Arvind

Bansal for today itself at 02:00 PM.

IO shall remain present before the Ld. Plea Bargaining Judge

with the previous conviction record of the accused.



FIR No. 1014/15 PS Amar Colony State Vs. Gurdeep Singh

24062016


Neither the IO is present despite being so directed nor any

supplementary charge sheet / further report is received in this matter.

B/Ws in the sum of Rs. 5,000/ with show cause notice u/s

60/122 D.P. Act be issued against the IO and notice to SHO concerned for

20.07.2016.



FIR No. 188/13 PS Crime Branch (South East)State Vs. Nagendra Kumar & Anr.

24062016


IO / Inspector Sanjeev Yadav in person

IO has submitted that it may take some more time for

obtaining sanction report u/s 197 Cr.P.C. Let it be expedited and IO shall

remain present with the report on 02.09.2016.



RC No. 13/05 CBI Vs. Mohd. Abdul Hafeez

24062016

Present: Sh. Kumar Rajat, Ld. Substitute PP for the CBI

Both accused Amit and Mohd. Hafeez are present.

Request for adjournment is made on behalf of CBI as Ld.

Regular PP is stated to have been transfered. Not opposed. Allowed.

Be put up for arguments on charge for 11.08.2016.

Notice to IO / holding IO be issued for the date fixed.



RC No. 31A/94 CBI Vs. Vimat Dutt

24062016


Accused Vimal Dutt and Om Prakash in person.



PW21 Inspector Rajesh Kumar has sent his oral request to

the summons served upon him. Summons to PW Jagmohan returned with

the report of his death. Copy of his death certificate annexed with the

report. Accordingly, his name stands deleted from the list of witnesses.

Be put up for PE on 13.07.2016. Witnesses as per list be

summoned afresh.



RC No. 10E/02 CBI Vs. Shekhar Verma

24062016


Accused Shekhar Verma absent.

Sh. Dhananjay Kaushal, Ld. Proxy Counsel for Sh. S.P.

Kaushal Ld. Counsel for the accused.


of the accused is filed. Heard and perused. Allowed for today only.



No PW is present / summoned. Be positively summoned for

29.07.2016.



FIR No. 751/03 PS KalkajiState Vs. Ravinder Gopi Bisht

24062016


Accused Ravinder Gopit Bisht in person.

Matter today is listed for PE. Summons to PW Satinder Singh

Yadav, Sunil John and Avatar Singh returned unserved. Report perused.

Let these witnesses be summoned afresh through IO / DCP South East for

PE on 19.08.2016. Notice to IO be also issued to remain present on the

date fixed.



FIR No. 756/04PS KalkajiState Vs. Ravinder Gopi Bisht

24062016


Accused Ravinder Gopit Bisht in person.

Matter today is listed for PE. Summons to PW Jaswinder

Sharma, Sunil John and Sunil Dawar returned unserved. Report perused.

Let these witnesses be summoned afresh through IO / DCP South East for

PE on 19.08.2016. Notice to IO be also issued to remain present on the

date fixed.



RC No. 6(A)/04 CBI Vs. Kamaljit Singh @ Raja

24062016

Present: Sh. Kumar Rajat, Ld. PP for the CBI

Accused Kamaljit Singh @ Raja in person.

Accused seeks adjournment as his counsel is not available due

to some personal difficulty. Not opposed. Allowed.

Matter now to come up for recording of S.A. on 30.06.2016.



TA No. PS Greater Kailash M/s Global Knits Vs. M/s Dee Kay Traders

24062016

Fresh Transfer Application received from filing

section. It be checked and registered.

Present: Applicant with Ld. Counsel Sh. Rajeev Kumar Malik.

File perused.

Comments be called from the concerned Court for 18.07.2016

at 02:00 PM.



IN THE COURT OF SH. SATISH KUMAR ARORA: CHIEF METROPOLITAN

MAGISTRATE, SOUTH EAST DISTRICT, NEW DELHI

MCA No. 48/16

State Bank of India, A CorporationConstituted under the State Bank ofIndia Act, 1955, Having its Central Office / Corporate Centre at State Bank Bhawan, Madame Cama Road,Mumbai400024, one of its local headoffice at 11, Sansad Marg, New Delhi10001 and having branches amongst others one at RACPC, Rohini A5, Pearls Best Heights1, Netaji Subhash Palace, Pitampura, Delhi34 .............Applicant Bank

Vs.1. Gaurav Chadha

S/o Lajpat Chadha, R/o H. No. 418, Ground Floor, Prakash Mohalla, East of Kailash, New Delhi110065.

Office Address:M/s Mediaid Medical System A60, Mohan Garden Extn. D.K. Road, UttamNagar, Delhi110059 .............. Respondent

At 02:00 PMPresent : None for the petitioner bank.

Matter today is listed for clarifications / orders. File perused.

This is an application moved by the applicant bank u/s. 14 of the

Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of

Security Interest Act, 2002(in short, the SARFAESI Act).

Ld. Counsel for the petitioner bank was heard and the relevant

provisions of the law were also taken note of. The original documents relating to

the loan/hypothecation and the vehicle in question were produced by the

petitioner bank and were perused. The documents/affidavit have also been

produced in support of the submission that notice of Section 13 (2) of the Act

was duly served upon the respondent and despite that the outstanding amount

has not been paid within the stipulated period. It is stated that hypothecated

vehicle is with the respondent residing in District SouthEast.

Section 14 of the aforesaid Act makes it mandatory for the

Cont....P2

2

CMM/ACMM to order taking possession of the assets mortgaged/ hypothecated

and the documents relating there to and forward such assets and documents to

the Secured creditor and for the purpose of securing compliance, the court may

take or cause to be taken such steps and, use or cause to be used, such force, as

may, in his opinion, be necessary.

In view of the aforesaid provisions of law and the submission

made I appoint Sh. Javed Khan, Advocate, Enrollment No. D/487/2015, office

at: Chamber No. 605, Saket Courts Complex, Mobile Numbers: 9873743053, e

mail ID: [email protected] to take possession of the hypothecated

Vehicle i.e. VERNA CRDI 1.6 SX BSIV having particulars as under:

Registration No. : DL 2C AR 2413Engine No. : D4FBCU255849Chassis No. : MALCU41ULDM112895with the help of police aid including one lady police official and submit his

report within three months from the date of this order. Receiver shall give

possession notice to the authorized officer of the secured creditor and the

borrower 15 days in advance, however, in cases of exigencies where there is a

possibility of the borrower avoiding the process or fleeing away with the vehicle

in question, the receiver instead of giving an advance notice as directed shall

serve upon the borrower a notice at the time of taking over of the possession of

the vehicle in question thereby giving him an opportunity to pay back the dues

of the bank as determined by the bank. The AR / concerned bank official for that

purpose shall also provide the proposed payment mechanism to the receiver to

be furnished subsequently to the borrower with the notice.

Receiver is also empowered to break open the locks where the

abovesaid vehicle is found parked. He shall prepare inventory with regards to

the items, if any, kept inside the vehicle, and hand over one list duly signed by

the witnesses and by the receiver to the borrower, if present at the site, and one

copy duly signed by the witnesses and by the receiver will be annexed with his

report. Photographs of the vehicle from various angles before take over and after

take over and photographs of the items kept inside the vehicle shall also be

taken by the receiver and be annexed with the report alongwith

negatives/certificate U/sec 65B of Indian Evidence Act. Broken locks shall be

Cont.....P3

3

sealed in cloth pullanda and be deposited with concerned Bank. After taking

over the subject vehicle it should be handed over to the authorized officer of the

bank. The expenses on this account shall be borne by the applicant bank and

photographs and negatives/certificate U/sec 65B of Indian Evidence Act be

enclosed with the report. Accompanying witnesses shall sign the proceedings.

Moreover, Receiver to ensure that while executing the order there is no stay from

any court in respect of the aforesaid vehicle / property. The fee of the Receiver is

fixed at Rs. 20,000/ (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) to be paid by the

petitioner bank. Fee of Rs. 10,000/ shall be paid to the receiver within 15 days

from today and the remaining fees shall be paid at the time of taking

possession of the vehicle or within one week thereof. A copy of this order be

given to the Receiver as well as to the petitioner bank for compliance and one

copy of order be sent to SHO concerned for providing assistance if required.

Objections, if any, by whomsoever concerned should be made

before the Debt Recovery Tribunal and no objections shall be entertained in this

Court. Under the scheme of the Act this court is supposed to provide the

assistance to the Financial Institutions to obtain the possession of the secured

asset in accordance with law. This court is not supposed to decide any of the

issue between the parties on its merits. After the appointment of Receiver

nothing survives in the petition. Receiver is directed to file the compliance

report in the office within three months from today, which be placed on the file

and then the file be consigned to record room after due compliance.


South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/24.06.2016

Documents

FIR No. 127/15 PS : GK (EOW) State Vs. Harmeet Singh …judis.nic.in/Daily_Orders/DDC/list_new2.asp?DO_Pdf_Name=...FIR No. 127/15 PS : GK (EOW) State Vs. Harmeet Singh Sood 24.06.2016