Upload
others
View
7
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Finite temperature LQCD with two �avors ofimproved Wilson fermions
V. Bornyakov
IHEP, Protvino
for DIK collaboration
Regensburg 29.07.07
V. Bornyakov (IHEP) Finite temperature LQCD 29.07.07 1 / 17
DESY - ITEP - Kanazawa collaboration
DESY:Y. Nakamura, G. Schierholz, V. Weinberg
ITEP:VB, S. Morozov, E. Lushchevskaya, M. Polikarpov
Kanazawa:T. Suzuki, T. Sekido, M. Hasegawa, K. Ishiguro, Y. Koma
V. Bornyakov (IHEP) Finite temperature LQCD 29.07.07 2 / 17
Outline
1 Critical temperature
2 Screening masses at T > Tc
3 Spatial string tension
4 Conclusions and perspectives
V. Bornyakov (IHEP) Finite temperature LQCD 29.07.07 3 / 17
Critical temperature
Critical temperature
� Nf = 2 lattice QCD� Wilson gauge �eld action� Improved Wilson fermionic action
SF = S(0)F − i
2κg csw a5
∑s
ψ̄(s)σµνFµν(s)ψ(s)
� Nt (Ns) = 8 (16),10 (24),12 (24)
� 1.3 < r0mπ < 2.9� r0mπ and r0/a obtained by interpolation/extrapolation of results by
QCDSF-UKQCD� Polyakov loop susceptibility χL
V. Bornyakov (IHEP) Finite temperature LQCD 29.07.07 4 / 17
Critical temperature
Critical temperature
� Nf = 2 lattice QCD� Wilson gauge �eld action� Improved Wilson fermionic action
SF = S(0)F − i
2κg csw a5
∑s
ψ̄(s)σµνFµν(s)ψ(s)
� Nt (Ns) = 8 (16),10 (24),12 (24)
� 1.3 < r0mπ < 2.9� r0mπ and r0/a obtained by interpolation/extrapolation of results by
QCDSF-UKQCD� Polyakov loop susceptibility χL
V. Bornyakov (IHEP) Finite temperature LQCD 29.07.07 4 / 17
Critical temperature
Critical temperature
� Nf = 2 lattice QCD� Wilson gauge �eld action� Improved Wilson fermionic action
SF = S(0)F − i
2κg csw a5
∑s
ψ̄(s)σµνFµν(s)ψ(s)
� Nt (Ns) = 8 (16),10 (24),12 (24)
� 1.3 < r0mπ < 2.9� r0mπ and r0/a obtained by interpolation/extrapolation of results by
QCDSF-UKQCD� Polyakov loop susceptibility χL
V. Bornyakov (IHEP) Finite temperature LQCD 29.07.07 4 / 17
Critical temperature
Critical temperature
� Nf = 2 lattice QCD� Wilson gauge �eld action� Improved Wilson fermionic action
SF = S(0)F − i
2κg csw a5
∑s
ψ̄(s)σµνFµν(s)ψ(s)
� Nt (Ns) = 8 (16),10 (24),12 (24)
� 1.3 < r0mπ < 2.9� r0mπ and r0/a obtained by interpolation/extrapolation of results by
QCDSF-UKQCD� Polyakov loop susceptibility χL
V. Bornyakov (IHEP) Finite temperature LQCD 29.07.07 4 / 17
Critical temperature
Critical temperature
� Nf = 2 lattice QCD� Wilson gauge �eld action� Improved Wilson fermionic action
SF = S(0)F − i
2κg csw a5
∑s
ψ̄(s)σµνFµν(s)ψ(s)
� Nt (Ns) = 8 (16),10 (24),12 (24)
� 1.3 < r0mπ < 2.9� r0mπ and r0/a obtained by interpolation/extrapolation of results by
QCDSF-UKQCD� Polyakov loop susceptibility χL
V. Bornyakov (IHEP) Finite temperature LQCD 29.07.07 4 / 17
Critical temperature
Critical temperature
� Nf = 2 lattice QCD� Wilson gauge �eld action� Improved Wilson fermionic action
SF = S(0)F − i
2κg csw a5
∑s
ψ̄(s)σµνFµν(s)ψ(s)
� Nt (Ns) = 8 (16),10 (24),12 (24)
� 1.3 < r0mπ < 2.9� r0mπ and r0/a obtained by interpolation/extrapolation of results by
QCDSF-UKQCD� Polyakov loop susceptibility χL
V. Bornyakov (IHEP) Finite temperature LQCD 29.07.07 4 / 17
Critical temperature
Critical temperature
� Nf = 2 lattice QCD� Wilson gauge �eld action� Improved Wilson fermionic action
SF = S(0)F − i
2κg csw a5
∑s
ψ̄(s)σµνFµν(s)ψ(s)
� Nt (Ns) = 8 (16),10 (24),12 (24)
� 1.3 < r0mπ < 2.9� r0mπ and r0/a obtained by interpolation/extrapolation of results by
QCDSF-UKQCD� Polyakov loop susceptibility χL
V. Bornyakov (IHEP) Finite temperature LQCD 29.07.07 4 / 17
Critical temperature
Fitting function
r0Tc(r0mπ,1/Nt) = r0Tc(0,0) + cN · 1N2
t+ cm · (r0mπ)d (1)
with d=1.08.
Another possibility for continuum limit extrapolation
r0Tc(r0mπ, a/r0) = r0Tc(0, 0) + cN ·(
ar0
)2
+ cm · (r0mπ)d (2)
Result of �t (1):r0Tc(r0mph
π , 0) = 0.438(6)(−7)(+13) (3)
V. Bornyakov (IHEP) Finite temperature LQCD 29.07.07 5 / 17
Critical temperature
Nt = ∞
Nt = 12
Nt = 10
Nt = 8
Wuppertal
RBC-Bielefeld
r0mπ
r0T
c
43210
0.6
0.55
0.5
0.45
0.4
V. Bornyakov (IHEP) Finite temperature LQCD 29.07.07 6 / 17
Critical temperature
Nt = ∞
Nt = 12
Nt = 10
Nt = 8
Wuppertal
RBC-Bielefeld
r0mπ
r0T
c
43210
0.6
0.55
0.5
0.45
0.4
V. Bornyakov (IHEP) Finite temperature LQCD 29.07.07 7 / 17
Screening masses at T > Tc
Screening masses at T > Tc
Free energy in di�erent color chanels:
e−F1(R,T )/T =13〈 TrL†(x)L(y) 〉
e−F8(R,T )/T =18〈 TrL†(x) TrL(y) 〉 − 1
24〈 TrL†(x)L(y) 〉
e−F6(R,T )/T =1
12〈 TrL(x) TrL(y) 〉+
112〈 TrL(x)L(y) 〉
e−F∗3 (R,T )/T =16〈 TrL(x) TrL(y) 〉 − 1
6〈 TrL(x)L(y) 〉
Nadkarni (1986)Fit at large RT :
VM(R,T ) ≡ FM(R,T )− FM(∞,T ) = −CMα(T )
Re−mD(T )R
V. Bornyakov (IHEP) Finite temperature LQCD 29.07.07 8 / 17
Screening masses at T > Tc
� Coulomb gauge Philipsen (2002)Iterative overrelaxation gauge �xing procedure with one gauge copy;check of Gribov copies e�ects with 3 random gauge copies
� Hypercubic blocking Hasenfratz and Knechtly (2001)HCB decreases statistical errrors by factor 3
V. Bornyakov (IHEP) Finite temperature LQCD 29.07.07 9 / 17
Screening masses at T > Tc
Previous studies in Nf = 2 QCD
Kaczmarek and Zantow (2005)staggered fermions, Nt = 4; mπ/mρ = 0.7
mD
T= A
(1 +
Nf
6
)1/2
gtwo−loop(T ) , A ≈ 1.4
V. Bornyakov (IHEP) Finite temperature LQCD 29.07.07 10 / 17
Screening masses at T > Tc
WHOT-QCD (2007)
� improved Wilson fermions, Nt = 4; mπ/mρ = 0.65,0.80� Casimir scaling for VM(R,T )
� phenomenological relation:
mD
T=
(1 +
Nf
6
)1/2 √4πα(T )
� Comparison with K&Z : agreement for α(T ), 20% deviation for mD(T )
� Too coarse lattices ?
V. Bornyakov (IHEP) Finite temperature LQCD 29.07.07 11 / 17
Screening masses at T > Tc
WHOT-QCD, T/Tc = 1.32
WHOT-QCD, T/Tc = 1.18
DIK, T/Tc = 1.27
RT
−R
·V
1(R
)
1.110.90.80.70.60.50.40.3
1
0.1
0.01
V. Bornyakov (IHEP) Finite temperature LQCD 29.07.07 12 / 17
Screening masses at T > Tc
WHOT-QCD, T/Tc = 1.32
WHOT-QCD, T/Tc = 1.18
DIK, T/Tc = 1.27
RT
R·V
3(R
)
10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.2
1
0.1
0.01
V. Bornyakov (IHEP) Finite temperature LQCD 29.07.07 13 / 17
Screening masses at T > Tc
M = 1
M = 3∗
RT
R·V
M(R
)/C
M
10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.2
0.1
0.01
V. Bornyakov (IHEP) Finite temperature LQCD 29.07.07 14 / 17
Spatial string tension
Spatial string tensionSpatial static potential Vs(R)
aVs(R) = limZ→∞
logW (R,Z )
W (R,Z + 1), (4)
W (R,Z ) are Wilson loops of size Ra × Z
a
Ansatz:Vs(R) = V0 − α/R + σsR . (5)
temperature interval: 0.8 < T/Tc < 1.3
V. Bornyakov (IHEP) Finite temperature LQCD 29.07.07 15 / 17
Spatial string tension
σ(0), [3]
[2]
σ(T), [1]
σs(T)
T/Tc
σ(T
)r2 0
1.51.41.31.21.110.90.80.7
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
[1] DIK (2003)[2] Agasian (2003)[3] UKQCD (2001)
V. Bornyakov (IHEP) Finite temperature LQCD 29.07.07 16 / 17
Conclusions and perspectives
Conclusions and perspectives
� Tc is computed for Nf = 2 with improved Wilson fermions on latticeswith Nt = 8, 10, 12Tc in the continuum limit at physical mπ is in agreement with bothRBC-Bielefeld and Wuppertal resultswarning message for RBC-Bielefeld concerning their continuumextrapolation
� Screening masses at T/Tc ≈ 1.3 in full agreement with WHOT-QCDresults con�rming disagreement with staggered fermions results
� Spatial string tension for 0.8 < T/Tc < 1.3 is practically constant andapproximately equal to T = 0 string tensionAgreement with theoretical prediction for T & Tc
� Simulations of �nite temperature Nf = 2 + 1 QCD with improved Wilsonfermions and tadpole improved Symanzik gauge �eld action have beenstarted
V. Bornyakov (IHEP) Finite temperature LQCD 29.07.07 17 / 17