Finding an Ectopic Pregnancy

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/9/2019 Finding an Ectopic Pregnancy

    1/2

  • 8/9/2019 Finding an Ectopic Pregnancy

    2/2

    Imaging

     Vol 17 No 1 Autumn 2015 15

    adnexal mass that moves separately to the ovary will usuallybe seen. It may range in appearance from an inhomogeneousmass through to a distinct gestational sac with or without a fetalpole, yolk sac or fetal heart. The latter finding will usually bein the presence of an empty uterus and hCG level well above

    the discriminatory threshold. The corpus luteum can be seen asa ‘ring of fire’ on colour Doppler and will be on the ipsilateralside in 70–85 per cent of tubal pregnancies.3 About 60 percent of tubal pregnancies will appear as an inhomogeneousmass, 20 per cent will appear as a hyperechoic ring(sometimes called a ‘bagel sign’) and only 13–15 per cent willhave an obvious gestation sac and fetal pole, with or withoutfetal cardiac activity.4,8

    • Interstitial pregnancy – one to five per cent of ectopicpregnancies lie in the interstitial part of the Fallopian tube(the part of the Fallopian tube that traverses the myometrium).The gestation sac will lie outside the cavity in the interstitialarea surrounded by a thin continuous rim of myometrium. An‘interstitial line’ is often seen consisting of a thin echogenic linethat extends from the central uterine cavity to the periphery ofthe interstitial sac and presumably represents the endometrialcanal of the interstitial part of the Fallopian tube.12

    • Cervical pregnancy – these occur in less than one per centof ectopic pregnancies. The uterine cavity will appear emptyand cervix may appear barrel shaped with the gestation sacor trophoblastic mass lying below the level of the internalcervical os. There may be a negative ‘sliding organ sign’ – in amiscarriage a gestation sac lying within the cervical canal willslide against the endocervical canal when transducer probepressure is applied to the cervix, but an implanted cervicalpregnancy will remain fixed.

    • Caesarean section scar pregnancy – in women with a previous

    caesarean section these may make up to six per cent of allectopic pregnancies. Appearances can be similar to a cervicalpregnancy, but gestation sac or trophoblastic mass is locatedanteriorly at the level of the internal os covering the visible orlikely site of the caesarean section scar.

    • Ovarian pregnancy – this is a much rarer form of ectopicpregnancy, but will appear as a cystic structure or gestation sacwithin or on the ovary. The gestation sac cannot be separatedfrom the ovary on gentle palpation.

    • Abdominal pregnancy – most of these pregnancies will be theresult of tubal abortion with re-implantation in the abdominalcavity, usually on the broad ligament. Rarely, a primaryimplantation in the abdominal cavity will occur. It is oftendifficult to distinguish from a tubal pregnancy on ultrasound.

    • Heterotopic pregnancy – risk factors include in vitro fertilisationand super-ovulation-based fertility treatments. In women withno history of fertility treatment, the risk is less than one in10 000 pregnancies. They may occur in between one andthree per cent of women undergoing fertility treatment andshould be looked for in such women presenting with earlypregnancy bleeding or pain.

     A final word Always take a careful history, pinpointing if possible the exact datesof the last menstrual period, the dates of a positive pregnancy test,and dates of early pregnancy bleeding and pain. Early pregnancytransvaginal ultrasound requires a high level of operator skilland experience. Ultrasound is a dynamic investigation and, as a

    gynaecologist, relying on the written interpretation of ultrasoundimages alone will expose you to a greater risk of delayed ormisdiagnosis. Where possible, review the images with yourradiologist or, if your work setting permits, be present when the scan

    is performed so ultrasound images can be correlated with patienthistory, symptoms, hCG levels and examination findings.

    References1 Lewis G (ed). Saving Mother Lives: Reviewing Maternal Deaths

    to make Motherhood Safer – 2006-2008. The Eighth Report onConfidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom.BJOG. 2011;118(suppl 1) 1-205.

    2 Kirk E, Papageorghiou AT, Condous G et al. The diagnosticeffectiveness of an initial transvaginal scan in detecting ectopicpregnancy. Human Reproduction. 2007;22:2824-2828.

    3 Condous G, Okaro E, Khalid A et al. The accuracy of transvaginalsonography for the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy prior to surgery.Human Reproduction. 2005;20:1404-1409.

    4 Atri M, Valenti DA, Bret PM et al. Effect of transvaginal sonography onthe use of invasive procedures for evaluating patients with a clinicaldiagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound. 2003;31:1-8.

    5 Shalev E, Yarom I, Bustam M et al. Transvaginal sonography as theultimate diagnostic tool for the management of ectopic pregnancy:experience with 840 cases. Fertility and Sterility. 1998;69:62-65

    6 Barnhart K, van Mello NM, Bourne T et al. Pregnancy of unknownlocation: a consensus statement of nomenclature, definitions andoutcome. Fertility and Sterility. 2011;95:857-866.

    7 Kirk E, Condous G, Bourne T. Pregnancy of unknown location.Best Practice and Research in Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2009;23:493-499.

    8 Kirk E, Daemen A, Papageorghiou AT, et al, Why are some ectopicpregnancies characterized as pregnancies of unknown location atthe initial transvaginal ultrasound examination? Acta Obstet GynecolScand. 2008;87:1150-1154.

    9 Mol BW, Hajenius PJ, Engelsbel S et al. Serum human chorionicgonadotrophin measurement in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancywhen transvaginal ultrasonography is inconclusive. Fertility and Sterility.1998;70:972-981.

    10 Visconti K, Zite N. hCG in ectopic pregnancy. Clinical Obstetrics and

    Gynecology. 2012;55:410-417.11 Braffman BH, Coleman BG, Ramchandani P, et al. Emergency

    department screening for ectopic pregnancy: a prospective US study.Radiology. 1994;190:797-802.

    12 Akerman TE, Levi CS, Dashefsky SM, et al. Interstitial line: sonographicfinding in interstitial corneal ectopic pregnancy. Radiology. 1993;189:83-87.

    Have you changed your address or

    email account recently?

    Have you notied the College of

    these changes?

    If not, please update your contact details

    via the RANZCOG website (www.ranzcog.edu.au) and follow the link to ‘Updatecontact details’ or call 03 9417 1699 to notifythe College of your changed contact details.