Upload
vuongkien
View
214
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Financing the Commodity Sector
Matthieu LACAZE
Deputy Global Head of E&C Finance
March 2012
ARA 2012 - AFRICAN REFINERS ASSOCIATION
2
Increased financing
needs of the Commodity
sector
New constraints
on financing imposed to
banking industry
A New Paradigm
a new market with new rules
A New Paradigm: a growing sector which must explore new fuelling sources
3
1. Increased financing needs of the Commodity industry
4
The Commodity Market grows on the back of strong
market fundamentals
Demography
o Very important increase of worldwide population
o From 2.5bn in 1950 to 9bn by 2050!
Increased consumption of commodities per capita
o Change of living standard & habits
o New technologies
o Growing size of middle-class
Historically high commodity prices…
o Tensions on the market
o Stable futures
o Commodity extraction costs on the rise
Mostly driven by Emerging Markets growth
Increased financing needs of the Commodity industry
Larger Volumes x High Prices = Fast growing E&C sector
Population levels and growth (in millions)
Oil consumption (in ‘000bopd) and prices (in $ /bbl)
Sources: IEA World Energy Outlook 2011, BNP Paribas
3337
6840
8333
0
2 500
5 000
7 500
10 000
1965 2009 2030
Non-OECD
World
OECD
Sources: United Nations figures
S. & Cent. America
North America
Europe & Eurasia
Middle East
Africa
Asia Pacific
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20 000
40 000
60 000
80 000
100 000
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
5
A Global Growing Market
Current and Long-Term Trends for Regional Crude Oil Demand (IEA New Policies Scenario) (million barrels per day)
Sources: IEA World Energy Outlook 2011, BNP Paribas
OECD Americas OECD Europe
India
China
Other Asia
OECD Asia Oceania
0 5 10 15 20 25
2010
2020
2035
Latin America Africa
Middle East
E. Europe & Eurasia
0 5 10
2010
2020
2035
0 5 10
2010
2020
2035
0 5 10 15
2010
2020
2035
0 5 10
2010
2020
2035
0 5 10
2010
2020
2035
0 5 10 15
2010
2020
2035
0 5 10
2010
2020
2035
0 5 10
2010
2020
2035
0 5 10
2010
2020
2035
Total World
2010 86.7
2020 92.4
2035 99.4
Main Consumption in the Developed Countries,
but Growth in the Emerging Countries
6
The various players of the “commodity chain”
… and their respective financing requirements
Producers Oil producers
Mining companies
Transformers Refineries
Smelters
Traders Small traders
Large trading companies
Trading groups of large companies
Distributors Bunkering
Wholesale
Terminals
Downstream Midstream Upstream
Transportation
Logistics
Each category of players needs specific set of financing products.
Financing mainly provided by banks but also by Capital Markets
The mix between those 2 sources of financing will change.
Mainly Bank Debt
Structurally highly leveraged
No fixed assets
Mostly ST financing
Capital Markets + Bank Debt
Important fixed assets (LT)
Capital intensive
LT financing for Capex
ST financing for Opex
Bank Debt + Capital Markets
Fixed assets with MT financing
needs
7
2. New constraints on financing volumes available from banking
industry
8
Banks are facing 2 sets of challenges:
I. A STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: the implementation of Basel 3
Increasingly stringent
Quicker implementation than originally planned
Aimed at reinforcing the robustness of financial institutions
AND
II. A CONJONCTURAL ELEMENT: US Money Market Funds have drastically reduced their
exposure to European banking sector since mid-2011
Resulting in a greater difficulty for European Banks to access US Dollars funding, and
Directly impacts the Energy and Commodity sectors which are massively dollarized.
New constraints on financing volumes available from banking industry
9
2. New constraints on financing volumes available from banking
industry
I. A STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: the implementation of Basel 3 for banks
II. A CONJONCTURAL ELEMENT: US Money Market Funds have reduced their
exposure since July 2011
10
Various institutions develop proposals for regulatory changes
National level
Regional level
(European Union only)
Basel
Committee
FSB
G20
High-level guidelines of policy
direction
Key role in financial regulations
Develops high-level guidelines
which are typically endorsed by
G20
Policy recommendations to
internationally active banks
For EU members, provides
binding directives and guidelines
Sets laws and regulations for
financial institutions
Supervises financial activities in
domestic system
Where do we stand?
• Far-reaching regulatory guidelines provided,
e.g., Pittsburgh declaration and December
2009 "Basel III" proposal
•US with substantial regulatory activity
• EU Commission has been fast in transforming
guidance into directives (CRD 3 and 4, EMIR)
•Most European countries wait for EU directives
while some have been "front-running" (French
rules on compensations, FSA liquidity regime)
• Some countries with significant consumer
protection activity (Germany, France)
Ultimate responsibility in respective jurisdiction
Political coordination / guidelines
11
Participants
Implementation
Expected Outcome
13 countries
Basel II Basel III and other reforms post-crisis
27 countries
Base
l le
vel
U.S.: never applied Uncertain/differentiated application of recommendations
Credit Risk-
sensitive
approach
for capital
Less capital for
banks with high-
quality portfolios
Capital requirements:
Risk-sensitive approach
confirmed BUT
- More capital base,
of better quality
- Additional capital
charges and capital
buffers
Much more capital for
all banks
Market Risk
Securitisation
1 LCR: Liquidity Coverage Ratio 2 NSFR: Net Stable Funding Ratio
New constraints on:
- Size (Leverage ratio)
- Liquidity (LCR1 & NSFR2)
- Incitation for banks to use
clearing houses
- Banking resolution
(e.g. bail-in proposals)
- Financial taxes
- Specific activities
(e.g. proprietary trading)
- Accounting
Some non-coordinated
efforts of supervisors
Basel 3 Basel 2.5
Regulation on banks: from Basel II to Basel III
12
Basel Committee documents are
based on the lessons of the crisis
At a micro-prudential level
1. Banking sectors of many countries
have built up excessive on- and
off-balance sheet leverage
2. The level and quality of the bank
capital base has been gradually
eroded
3. Banks were holding insufficient
liquidity buffers
At a macro-prudential level
4. The crisis was amplified by a
procyclical deleveraging process
5. And the interconnectedness of
systemic institutions through an
array of complex transactions
To prevent future crises, 5 key actions are
considered
2. Capital
• Better quality, higher level, more consistency and
transparency of the capital base
4. Risk coverage (counterparty & credit risks)
• Strengthen the capital requirements against counterparty
risk
• Raise the risk weight on exposure to financial sector
1. Leverage
• Promote a leverage ratio based on gross exposures
3. Liquidity
• Implementation of 2 liquidity ratios
5. Procyclicality
• Reduce procyclicality
• Promote countercyclical capital buffers
• Implement dynamic provisioning based on expected loss
Focus on “Basel III” framework
13
Common Equity
Tier 1 (CET 1)
Conservation
buffer (CET1)
Tier 2
(gone concern)
Additional T1
(going concern)
Countercyclical
buffer (CET1 or
equivalent)
Systemic buffer
(CET1 or
equivalent)
4,5%
2,5%
0-2,5%
Minimum CET 1
7%-13%
to distribute
dividends
depending on
banks and cycle
1,5%
2%
0-3,5%
Common
Equity
Tier 1
2%
Tier 1 2%
Tier 2 4%
From Basel II… … to Basel III
Basel 3 Impact on Banks Capital Structure
To limit
distribution
when losses
occur
To reduce
procyclicality
To reduce
systemic risk
To bear losses
and respect the
leverage ratio
Higher minimum requirements
(Basel Committee)
14
Key Take-aways on the new regulatory framework
Regulatory costs to increase for all banking products in the coming
years
Some products more impacted: unsecured vs. secured
financials vs. corporates
back-up vs. other purposes
Several banks, particularly in Europe are already implementing changes
15
2. New constraints on financing volumes available from banking
industry
I. A STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: the implementation of Basel 3 for banks
II. A CONJONCTURAL ELEMENT: US Money Market Funds have reduced their
exposure since July 2011
16
A deteriorated environment for Euro area banks…
5-year CDS for Selected European Sovereign
Source: Bloomberg, March 2012.
Market sentiment regarding Euro area Sovereign Debt slightly improved since December 2011
Continued uncertainty in financial markets relating to sustainability of public finances in some
eurozone economies + fear of contagion affecting core euro area countries
… but some improvement already observed in 2012
Some reopening of interbank market observed, especially for shorter tenors;
Increased cost of funding was only partially passed on to borrowers at this stage.
17
3. A New Paradigm :
a growing market which must explore new financing sources
18
A New Paradigm: How to adjust to this new world?
Banks: increase the distribution of loans particularly to the non-banking sector.
Allow your banks to bring new comers which cannot finance your activities directly,
As potential investors have already shown a strong apetite for Oil & gas transactions,
But their yield requirements might differ from banks.
Clients: optimize utilization of credit lines (economic cycles, funded/unfunded,
...)
Need to better manage through-the-cycle processes in order to limit financing requirements
o Minimize inventory, and adjust terms of payments to economic cycles, and
o improve payment performance
Is the Commodity Sector too dependant on US Dollars ?
19
A New Paradigm: The new parameters which will impact financing costs
Financing costs for
Borrowers
Greater importance of side business
(eg cash mgmt and hedging)
KYC, Payment risk and loans performance
will be under close scrutiny
New financiers requirements on
Return on Assets
may differ from historical lenders’ Basel 3
impacts
on banks costs of funding
Access to US Dollars
for USD denominated
facilities
20
Despite the difficulties, one shall keep in mind that:
European institutions have played a prominent role for decades in financing the
commodity business in Europe, Middle East and Africa and can still boast of:
Excellent track record of operations with key industrial counterparts involved in strategic
transformation or import/export transactions;
Very strong know-how in structuring, and arranging deals in the most efficient way;
In-depth knowledge of the countries and counterpart’s activities which was acquired through
years of local due diligences and daily communications with our clients
Teams dedicated to the Oil & Gas sector to better address the sector’s specifics
Unrivalled syndication capabilities expected to further expand to new financing products.
A New Paradigm: How will your historical partners will help you to adapt?
New challenges for all commodity players and banks to keep on working in a sustainable way.
Banks proven track record in serving commodity players’ needs.
21
This document is only directed at (a) professional customers and eligible counterparties as defined by the markets in Financial Investments
Directive, and (b) where relevant, persons who have professional experience in matters relating to investments who fall within Article 19(1) of the
Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005. Any person who is not a relevant person should not act or rely on this
document or any of its contents.
Information in this publication is intended to provide only a general outline of the subjects covered. It should neither be regarded as comprehensive
nor sufficient for making decisions, nor should it be used in place of professional advice. The BNP Paribas Group does not accept responsibility for
any loss arising from any action taken by anyone using this material.
BNP Paribas is incorporated in France with Limited Liability. Registered Office 16 boulevard des Italiens, 75009 Paris. BNP Paribas is authorised by
CECEI and supervised by the Commission Bancaire.
This document is for the use of intended recipients and may not be reproduced (in whole or in part) or delivered or transmitted to any other person
without the prior written consent of BNP Paribas. By accepting this document you agree to be bound by the foregoing limitations.
© BNP Paribas (2012). All rights reserved
Disclaimer