Upload
babasab-patil-karrisatte
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/2/2019 Finance and Private Sector Development PPT @ BEC BAGALKOT MBA
1/19
FINANCE AND PRIVATE
SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
8/2/2019 Finance and Private Sector Development PPT @ BEC BAGALKOT MBA
2/19
Background
World Bank and National Governments carry outmany finance and private sector projects everyyear, but to date few have been rigorouslyevaluated.
This makes it difficult for us to know what works,why, and what could we do better
Purpose of this workshop is to take a big steptowards rectifying this status quo.
=> But first lets take stock of what has beenpossible, and in the process illustrate differentmethods of evaluation you will be learning in theworkshop, as well as issues to keep in mind thisweek.
8/2/2019 Finance and Private Sector Development PPT @ BEC BAGALKOT MBA
3/19
What is an impact evaluation?
Differs from how M&E typically done forBank/Government projects. E.g. project disbursed $7 million in loans, trained
2,000 firms, etc. This tells us nothing abouteffectiveness.
Rigorous impact evaluation compares theoutcomes of a program or policy against an
explicit counterfactual of what would havehappened without the program or policy, andtakes seriously the issue of why some firms,regions etc. participate in the program and
others do not.
8/2/2019 Finance and Private Sector Development PPT @ BEC BAGALKOT MBA
4/19
Why has evaluation not takenplace to date?
Perception that many finance and privatesector policies lend themselves less to formalevaluations:
Changes in laws or regulations may occur ateconomy-wide level
Large loan may be given only to one or two banks
Lack of incentives for both Bank operational
staff and Governments to do Lack of knowledge as to what is possible
=> Hopefully this week we can overcome thesebarriers.
8/2/2019 Finance and Private Sector Development PPT @ BEC BAGALKOT MBA
5/19
What have we learned?
A Few examples:
How to raise the incomes of the self-employed?
Rethinking the design of microfinance
Providing insurance to the poor
Learning from regulatory reform
8/2/2019 Finance and Private Sector Development PPT @ BEC BAGALKOT MBA
6/19
How to raise the incomes of the self-employed?
Policy Question: Self-employment accounts forimportant share of employment. But do theseenterprises have scope to grow, or are they just
stuck in subsistence waiting for wage jobs?Randomized Experiment in Sri Lanka took
random sample of 600 microenterprises andsurveyed them.
Then randomly chose half of them to give grantsof $100 and $200 to.
Then followed these enterprises for the next threeyears, surveying them every 3 months.
8/2/2019 Finance and Private Sector Development PPT @ BEC BAGALKOT MBA
7/19
8/2/2019 Finance and Private Sector Development PPT @ BEC BAGALKOT MBA
8/19
8/2/2019 Finance and Private Sector Development PPT @ BEC BAGALKOT MBA
9/19
8/2/2019 Finance and Private Sector Development PPT @ BEC BAGALKOT MBA
10/19
Firms randomly chosen to receive these grantscan be compared to firms which were randomlychosen not to receive them
(Male Results)
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
Treatment Control
Baseline
Follow-up
8/2/2019 Finance and Private Sector Development PPT @ BEC BAGALKOT MBA
11/19
(Female results)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
Treatment Control
Baseline
Follow-up
8/2/2019 Finance and Private Sector Development PPT @ BEC BAGALKOT MBA
12/19
What have we learned?
Rethinking central precepts of microfinance? Low returns to female businesses in Sri Lanka provides
reason to question exclusive focus on women Experiment in Philippines found converting group to
individual liability led to faster client growth and no changein default (among existing clients)
Experiment in South Africa found marginal loan recipientstaking high interest consumer loans were better off 6-12months later along with high returns to capital, rejectsargument that poor cant pay high rates.
Large randomized trial of microfinance in India andPhilippines finds fairly modest results after 1 year, with littleimpact on poverty reduction.
8/2/2019 Finance and Private Sector Development PPT @ BEC BAGALKOT MBA
13/19
What have we learned?
Insuring poor farmers Does offering rainfall insurance increase use of
credit by risk-averse farmers Experiment in Malawi finds evidence it does not.
General experience has been low take-up: e.g.4.6% for one product in India, 17% in Malawi.
Research suggests trust and financial literacyboth play roles Implications for designing products should be
simple, and pay out with reasonable frequency.
8/2/2019 Finance and Private Sector Development PPT @ BEC BAGALKOT MBA
14/19
What have we learned?Learning from regulatory reform
Setting up one-stop shops to improve process of starting a business is apopular reform
Often reforms like this are phased in at a municipal or regional level,offering scope for a difference-in-differences evaluation Example: Mexico simplified the process of business registration
Due to staffing constraints, the federal agency could not implement the reform inall priority municipalities at once, but instead staggered the reforms, introducingthem first in some municipalities and then later in others. Among the municipalitiesidentified as priorities for implementation, there was no specification of whichshould go first.
A Difference-in-differences estimation can then be used to estimate the effect ofthe reform by comparing changes in business start-ups in the municipalities whichgot the reforms earlier to the changes in business start-ups in the similar
municipalities which were to receive this reform later. Results show increase in registration and employment, but coming from new entry, not
conversion of existing firms.
8/2/2019 Finance and Private Sector Development PPT @ BEC BAGALKOT MBA
15/19
What have we learned?
Learning from regulatory reform
Often reform introduced into entire country atonce, but only applies to subset of population.
Regression Discontinuity or Diff-in-Diff may bepossible.
E.g. evaluation of bankruptcy reform in Colombiawhich reduced costs of re-organizing a bankrupt firm.Active, non-bankrupt firms not affected by law, so canuse difference-in-differences comparing active tobankrupt.
Find reform led to improvement in efficiency of bankruptcyprocedure.
8/2/2019 Finance and Private Sector Development PPT @ BEC BAGALKOT MBA
16/19
Lessons
1) Why have these topics been the ones whereprogress has been made?
- Close ties to theoretical work, and in many
cases, theoretical effects unclear.- Have been feasible for researchers to do with
existing data sets or implementing with an NGO
=> Big opportunity is to do this with larger projects.
8/2/2019 Finance and Private Sector Development PPT @ BEC BAGALKOT MBA
17/19
Lessons
2) Variety of tools means evaluation of manyfinance and private sector programs ispossible.
8/2/2019 Finance and Private Sector Development PPT @ BEC BAGALKOT MBA
18/19
Lessons
3) Ex-ante design beats ex-post
- Huge issues with data availability,understanding what program did, how it
selected people, etc. ex post.=> Need to get researchers involved frominitial design of new projects, rather than
coming ex post.
8/2/2019 Finance and Private Sector Development PPT @ BEC BAGALKOT MBA
19/19
Where should we go from here?
Scope for much more work in the areas where existing effortshave occurred: microfinance, microenterprises, insurance,regulatory reform. Still only a handful of rigorous studies.
Big gains to be had from looking at impacts of policies andprojects designed to benefit large numbers of consumers and
firms: Financial literacy and consumer protection
SME sector policiestraining, loans, enterprise support
Housing finance
=> Major area is big policies where too expensive for NGOs or
researchers to run themselves should be in comparativeadvantage of the World Bank to work with National Governmentsto do.