Final Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 1st Placement ......Final Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 1st Placement Mid-Level Cooperating Teachers Competency N/A (-1) Unsatisfactory

Final Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 1st Placement Mid-Level Cooperating Teachers

Competency N/A

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average

1.1 Lesson plan is appropriate to age group and

subject 0 0 0% 0 0% 2 15% 11 85% 2.85

1.2 Demonstrates knowledge of students’

needs/interests 0 0 0% 0 0% 6 46% 7 54% 2.54

1.3 Demonstrates knowledge of content &

pedagogy 0 0 0% 0 0% 8 62% 5 38% 2.38

1.4 Demonstrates knowledge of classroom

resources 0 0 0% 0 0% 3 23% 10 77% 2.77

1.5 Designs lessons for differentiated

instruction 0 0 0% 0 0% 9 69% 4 31% 2.31

2.1 Creates a safe, engaging learning

environment 0 0 0% 1 8% 2 15% 10 77% 2.69

2.2 Interacts respectfully/genuinely with

students 0 0 0% 0 0% 2 15% 11 85% 2.85

2.3 Manages transitions smoothly and

efficiently 0 0 0% 0 0% 9 69% 4 31% 2.31

2.4 Monitors and responds to student behavior 0 0 0% 3 23% 5 38% 5 38% 2.15

2.5 Arranges and oversees student work

groups 0 0 0% 0 0% 5 38% 8 62% 2.62

2.6 Demonstrates classroom management

strategies 0 0 0% 3 23% 4 31% 6 46% 2.23

3.1 Communicates clear learning expectations 0 0 0% 0 0% 7 54% 6 46% 2.46

3.2 Communicates importance/relevance of

content 0 0 0% 1 8% 5 38% 7 54% 2.46

3.3 Voice is loud, clear, and pleasant 0 0 0% 0 0% 2 15% 11 85% 2.85

3.4 Introduction (set) is made to the lesson 0 0 0% 0 0% 6 46% 7 54% 2.54

3.5 Asks key questions allowing adequate

response time 0 0 0% 0 0% 4 31% 9 69% 2.69

3.6 Content/ideas communicated clearly and

accurately 0 0 0% 0 0% 7 54% 6 46% 2.46

3.7 Technology is effectively utilized 1 0 0% 0 0% 3 25% 9 75% 2.75

3.8 Motivates students with positive

reinforcement 0 0 0% 0 0% 4 31% 9 69% 2.69

Final Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 1st Placement Mid-Level Cooperating Teachers

Competency N/A

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average

3.9 Uses variety of materials, activities, and

methods 0 0 0% 0 0% 4 31% 9 69% 2.69

3.10 Assesses students for understanding

during the lesson 0 0 0% 0 0% 3 23% 10 77% 2.77

3.11 Appropriate summary/conclusion evidenced 0 0 0% 1 8% 4 31% 8 62% 2.54

3.12 Assessment is made at the conclusion of a

lesson 0 0 0% 1 8% 5 38% 7 54% 2.46

3.13 Lesson plan is followed and adjusted when

necessary 0 0 0% 1 8% 4 31% 8 62% 2.54

3.14 Uses correct oral and written language 0 0 0% 0 0% 4 31% 9 69% 2.69

4.1 Professional in appearance and demeanor 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 13 100% 3.00

4.2 Assignments are neat and timely 0 0 0% 0 0% 4 31% 9 69% 2.69

4.3 Follows rules and policies of the institution 0 0 0% 0 0% 2 15% 11 85% 2.85

4.4 Uses self-reflection for future teaching 0 1 8% 0 0% 4 31% 8 62% 2.46

4.5 Welcomes and seeks out feedback for

improvement 0 0 0% 1 8% 2 15% 10 77% 2.69

4.6 Works effectively with cooperating teacher 0 0 0% 0 0% 1 8% 12 92% 2.92

4.7 Communicates well with university

supervisor 2 0 0% 0 0% 3 27% 8 73% 2.73

4.8 Connects with school and community 2 0 0% 0 0% 6 55% 5 45% 2.45

Final Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 1st Placement PK-4 Cooperating Teachers

Competency N/A

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average

1.1 Lesson plan is appropriate to age group

and subject 0 0 0% 0 0% 14 30% 33 70% 2.70


needs/interests 0 0 0% 1 2% 13 28% 33 70% 2.68


pedagogy 0 0 0% 2 4% 17 36% 28 60% 2.55


resources 0 0 0% 1 2% 14 30% 32 68% 2.66


instruction 0 0 0% 3 6% 17 36% 27 57% 2.51


environment 0 0 0% 0 0% 9 19% 38 81% 2.81


students 0 0 0% 0 0% 8 17% 39 83% 2.83


efficiently 0 0 0% 5 11% 15 32% 27 57% 2.47



groups 0 0 0% 2 4% 14 30% 31 66% 2.62


strategies 0 0 0% 2 4% 18 38% 27 57% 2.53



content 0 0 0% 4 9% 12 26% 31 66% 2.57




response time 0 0 0% 2 4% 12 26% 33 70% 2.66


accurately 0 0 0% 1 2% 17 36% 29 62% 2.60



reinforcement 0 0 0% 0 0% 12 26% 35 74% 2.74

Final Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 1st Placement PK-4 Cooperating Teachers

Competency N/A

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average


methods 0 0 0% 2 4% 13 28% 32 68% 2.64



3.11 Appropriate summary/conclusion

evidenced 0 0 0% 3 6% 17 36% 27 57% 2.51


lesson 0 0 0% 2 4% 18 38% 27 57% 2.53


necessary 0 0 0% 0 0% 13 28% 34 72% 2.72







improvement 0 0 0% 0 0% 11 23% 36 77% 2.77



supervisor 6 0 0% 1 2% 10 24% 30 73% 2.71


Mid-Point Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 1st Placement Mid-Level Cooperating Teachers

Competency N/A

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average


subject 0 0 0% 0 0% 6 46% 7 54% 2.54


needs/interests 0 0 0% 2 15% 7 54% 4 31% 2.15


pedagogy 0 0 0% 0 0% 9 69% 4 31% 2.31


resources 0 0 0% 1 8% 3 23% 9 69% 2.62


instruction 0 0 0% 3 23% 6 46% 4 31% 2.08


environment 0 0 0% 1 8% 5 38% 7 54% 2.46


students 0 0 0% 0 0% 2 15% 11 85% 2.85


efficiently 0 0 0% 4 31% 8 62% 1 8% 1.77



groups 0 0 0% 2 15% 7 54% 4 31% 2.15


strategies 0 0 0% 4 31% 6 46% 3 23% 1.92



content 0 0 0% 2 15% 9 69% 2 15% 2.00




response time 0 0 0% 2 15% 7 54% 4 31% 2.15


accurately 0 0 0% 3 23% 7 54% 3 23% 2.00



reinforcement 0 0 0% 3 23% 5 38% 5 38% 2.15

Mid-Point Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 1st Placement Mid-Level Cooperating Teachers

Competency N/A

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average


methods 0 0 0% 0 0% 6 46% 7 54% 2.54





lesson 1 0 0% 3 25% 6 50% 3 25% 2.00


necessary 0 0 0% 1 8% 5 38% 7 54% 2.46







improvement 0 0 0% 1 8% 4 31% 8 62% 2.54



supervisor 3 0 0% 0 0% 4 40% 6 60% 2.60


Mid-Point Cooperating Teacher Spring 2015 1st Placement PK-4

Competency N/A

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average

1.1 Lesson plan is appropriate to age

group and subject 0 0 0% 1 2% 20 44% 24 53% 2.51

1.2 Demonstrates knowledge of

students’ needs/interests 0 0 0% 0 0% 22 49% 23 51% 2.51


content & pedagogy 0 0 0% 2 4% 26 58% 17 38% 2.33


classroom resources 0 0 0% 2 4% 22 49% 21 47% 2.42


instruction 0 0 0% 3 7% 28 62% 14 31% 2.24


environment 0 0 0% 1 2% 14 31% 30 67% 2.64

2.2 Interacts respectfully/genuinely

with students 0 0 0% 0 0% 12 27% 33 73% 2.73


efficiently 0 0 0% 6 13% 29 64% 10 22% 2.09

2.4 Monitors and responds to student

behavior 0 0 0% 6 13% 25 56% 14 31% 2.18

2.5 Arranges and oversees student

work groups 0 0 0% 2 4% 27 60% 16 36% 2.31

2.6 Demonstrates classroom

management strategies 0 0 0% 4 9% 29 64% 12 27% 2.18

3.1 Communicates clear learning

expectations 0 0 0% 3 7% 21 47% 21 47% 2.40

3.2 Communicates

importance/relevance of content 0 0 0% 2 4% 25 56% 18 40% 2.36


3.4 Introduction (set) is made to the

lesson 0 0 0% 0 0% 24 53% 21 47% 2.47

3.5 Asks key questions allowing

adequate response time 0 0 0% 4 9% 26 58% 15 33% 2.24

3.6 Content/ideas communicated

clearly and accurately 0 0 0% 1 2% 28 62% 16 36% 2.33

Mid-Point Cooperating Teacher Spring 2015 1st Placement PK-4

Competency N/A

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average



reinforcement 0 0 0% 0 0% 20 44% 25 56% 2.56

3.9 Uses variety of materials,

activities, and methods 0 0 0% 1 2% 25 56% 19 42% 2.40

3.10 Assesses students for

understanding during the lesson 0 0 0% 0 0% 25 56% 20 44% 2.44


evidenced 0 0 0% 2 4% 26 58% 17 38% 2.33

3.12 Assessment is made at the

conclusion of a lesson 1 0 0% 3 7% 26 59% 15 34% 2.27

3.13 Lesson plan is followed and

adjusted when necessary 0 0 0% 0 0% 18 40% 27 60% 2.60

3.14 Uses correct oral and written

language 0 0 0% 1 2% 20 44% 24 53% 2.51

4.1 Professional in appearance and

demeanor 0 0 0% 0 0% 10 22% 35 78% 2.78


4.3 Follows rules and policies of the

institution 0 0 0% 0 0% 12 27% 33 73% 2.73

4.4 Uses self-reflection for future

teaching 0 0 0% 2 4% 12 27% 31 69% 2.64

4.5 Welcomes and seeks out feedback

for improvement 0 0 0% 1 2% 11 24% 33 73% 2.71

4.6 Works effectively with cooperating

teacher 0 0 0% 0 0% 5 11% 40 89% 2.89


supervisor 8 0 0% 1 3% 14 38% 22 59% 2.57

4.8 Connects with school and

community 1 0 0% 1 2% 23 52% 20 45% 2.43

Final Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 2nd Placement Mid-Level Cooperating Teacher

Competency N/A

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average


subject 0 0 0% 0 0% 2 17% 10 83% 2.83


needs/interests 0 0 0% 0 0% 2 17% 10 83% 2.83


pedagogy 0 0 0% 0 0% 2 17% 10 83% 2.83


resources 0 0 0% 0 0% 2 17% 10 83% 2.83

1.5 Designs lessons for differentiated instruction 0 0 0% 0 0% 3 25% 9 75% 2.75


environment 0 0 0% 0 0% 1 8% 11 92% 2.92


students 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100% 3.00

2.3 Manages transitions smoothly and efficiently 0 0 0% 0 0% 2 17% 10 83% 2.83


2.5 Arranges and oversees student work groups 0 0 0% 0 0% 2 17% 10 83% 2.83


strategies 0 0 0% 0 0% 2 17% 10 83% 2.83



content 0 0 0% 0 0% 2 17% 10 83% 2.83




response time 0 0 0% 0 0% 2 17% 10 83% 2.83


accurately 0 0 0% 0 0% 2 17% 10 83% 2.83



reinforcement 0 0 0% 0 0% 2 17% 10 83% 2.83


methods 0 0 0% 0 0% 2 17% 10 83% 2.83

Final Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 2nd Placement Mid-Level Cooperating Teacher

Competency N/A

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average

3.10 Assesses students for understanding during

the lesson 0 0 0% 0 0% 1 8% 11 92% 2.92



lesson 0 0 0% 0 0% 3 25% 9 75% 2.75


necessary 0 0 0% 0 0% 1 8% 11 92% 2.92







improvement 0 0 0% 0 0% 3 25% 9 75% 2.75



supervisor 2 0 0% 0 0% 1 10% 9 90% 2.90


Final Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 2nd Placement PK-4 Cooperating Teacher

Competency N/A

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average


subject 0 0 0% 0 0% 10 22% 35 78% 2.78


needs/interests 0 0 0% 0 0% 10 22% 35 78% 2.78


pedagogy 0 0 0% 0 0% 16 36% 29 64% 2.64


resources 0 0 0% 0 0% 10 22% 35 78% 2.78


instruction 0 0 0% 1 2% 18 40% 26 58% 2.56


environment 0 0 0% 0 0% 6 13% 39 87% 2.87


students 0 0 0% 0 0% 7 16% 38 84% 2.84


efficiently 0 0 0% 2 4% 19 42% 24 53% 2.49




strategies 0 0 0% 2 4% 11 24% 32 71% 2.67



content 0 0 0% 0 0% 15 33% 30 67% 2.67




response time 0 0 0% 1 2% 10 22% 34 76% 2.73


accurately 0 0 0% 0 0% 12 27% 33 73% 2.73



reinforcement 0 0 0% 0 0% 9 20% 36 80% 2.80

Final Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 2nd Placement PK-4 Cooperating Teacher

Competency N/A

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average


methods 0 0 0% 1 2% 12 27% 32 71% 2.69


the lesson 0 0 0% 0 0% 11 24% 34 76% 2.76



lesson 0 0 0% 3 7% 13 29% 29 64% 2.58


necessary 0 0 0% 1 2% 8 18% 36 80% 2.78







improvement 0 0 0% 0 0% 7 16% 38 84% 2.84



supervisor 3 0 0% 0 0% 8 19% 34 81% 2.81


Mid-Point Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 2nd Placement Mid-Level Cooperating Teacher

Competency N/A

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average


subject 0 0 0% 0 0% 3 27% 8 73% 2.73


needs/interests 0 0 0% 1 9% 3 27% 7 64% 2.55


pedagogy 0 0 0% 0 0% 6 55% 5 45% 2.45


resources 0 0 0% 0 0% 3 27% 8 73% 2.73

1.5 Designs lessons for differentiated instruction 0 0 0% 1 9% 4 36% 6 55% 2.45


environment 0 0 0% 0 0% 3 27% 8 73% 2.73


students 0 0 0% 0 0% 2 18% 9 82% 2.82

2.3 Manages transitions smoothly and efficiently 0 0 0% 1 9% 5 45% 5 45% 2.36




strategies 0 0 0% 0 0% 5 45% 6 55% 2.55



content 0 0 0% 0 0% 6 55% 5 45% 2.45




response time 0 0 0% 0 0% 6 55% 5 45% 2.45


accurately 0 0 0% 0 0% 6 55% 5 45% 2.45



reinforcement 0 0 0% 0 0% 4 36% 7 64% 2.64


methods 0 0 0% 0 0% 5 45% 6 55% 2.55

Mid-Point Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 2nd Placement Mid-Level Cooperating Teacher

Competency N/A

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average


the lesson 0 0 0% 0 0% 4 36% 7 64% 2.64



lesson 0 0 0% 1 9% 5 45% 5 45% 2.36


necessary 0 0 0% 0 0% 3 27% 8 73% 2.73







improvement 0 0 0% 0 0% 5 45% 6 55% 2.55



supervisor 3 0 0% 0 0% 2 25% 6 75% 2.75


Mid-Point Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 2nd Placement PK-4 Cooperating Teacher

Competency N/A

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average


and subject 0 0 0% 0 0% 11 22% 38 78% 2.78


needs/interests 0 0 0% 1 2% 16 33% 32 65% 2.63


pedagogy 0 0 0% 1 2% 22 45% 26 53% 2.51


resources 0 0 0% 2 4% 16 33% 31 63% 2.59


instruction 0 0 0% 4 8% 17 35% 28 57% 2.49


environment 0 0 0% 0 0% 10 20% 39 80% 2.80


students 0 0 0% 0 0% 10 20% 39 80% 2.80


efficiently 0 0 0% 5 10% 22 45% 22 45% 2.35



groups 0 0 0% 3 6% 17 35% 29 59% 2.53


strategies 0 0 0% 2 4% 19 39% 28 57% 2.53



content 0 0 0% 1 2% 19 39% 29 59% 2.57




response time 0 0 0% 2 4% 17 35% 30 61% 2.57


accurately 1 0 0% 1 2% 20 42% 27 56% 2.54


Mid-Point Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 2nd Placement PK-4 Cooperating Teacher

Competency N/A

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average


reinforcement 0 0 0% 0 0% 16 33% 33 67% 2.67


methods 0 0 0% 0 0% 18 37% 31 63% 2.63




evidenced 0 0 0% 7 14% 15 31% 27 55% 2.41


lesson 0 0 0% 4 8% 23 47% 22 45% 2.37


necessary 0 0 0% 0 0% 12 24% 37 76% 2.76







improvement 0 0 0% 0 0% 13 27% 36 73% 2.73



supervisor 5 0 0% 1 2% 12 27% 31 70% 2.68


Final Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 1st Placement Mid-Level Supervisor

Competency N/A

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average


subject 0 0 0% 0 0% 3 23% 10 77% 2.77


needs/interests 0 0 0% 1 8% 4 31% 8 62% 2.54


pedagogy 0 0 0% 0 0% 6 46% 7 54% 2.54


resources 0 0 0% 0 0% 4 31% 9 69% 2.69


instruction 1 0 0% 1 8% 5 42% 6 50% 2.42


environment 0 0 0% 0 0% 3 23% 10 77% 2.77


students 0 0 0% 0 0% 4 31% 9 69% 2.69


efficiently 0 0 0% 2 15% 4 31% 7 54% 2.38



groups 1 0 0% 0 0% 5 42% 7 58% 2.58


strategies 0 0 0% 1 8% 6 46% 6 46% 2.38



content 2 0 0% 1 9% 3 27% 7 64% 2.55




response time 0 0 0% 1 8% 5 38% 7 54% 2.46


accurately 0 0 0% 1 8% 6 46% 6 46% 2.38


Final Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 1st Placement Mid-Level Supervisor

Competency N/A

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average


reinforcement 0 0 0% 3 23% 4 31% 6 46% 2.23


methods 0 0 0% 0 0% 6 46% 7 54% 2.54





lesson 0 0 0% 2 15% 4 31% 7 54% 2.38


necessary 0 0 0% 1 8% 2 15% 10 77% 2.69







improvement 0 0 0% 1 8% 3 23% 9 69% 2.62



supervisor 0 0 0% 0 0% 4 31% 9 69% 2.69


Final Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 1st Placement PK-4 Supervisor

Competency N/A

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average


and subject 0 0 0% 0 0% 15 30% 35 70% 2.70


needs/interests 0 0 0% 0 0% 23 46% 27 54% 2.54


pedagogy 0 0 0% 1 2% 25 50% 24 48% 2.46


resources 0 0 0% 1 2% 25 50% 24 48% 2.46


instruction 1 0 0% 3 6% 22 45% 24 49% 2.43


environment 0 0 0% 0 0% 16 32% 34 68% 2.68


students 0 0 0% 1 2% 14 28% 35 70% 2.68


efficiently 0 0 0% 4 8% 25 50% 21 42% 2.34



groups 0 0 0% 6 12% 17 34% 27 54% 2.42


strategies 2 0 0% 2 4% 26 54% 20 42% 2.38



content 5 0 0% 2 4% 23 51% 20 44% 2.40




response time 0 0 0% 3 6% 21 42% 26 52% 2.46


accurately 0 0 0% 0 0% 21 42% 29 58% 2.58


Final Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 1st Placement PK-4 Supervisor

Competency N/A

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average


reinforcement 0 0 0% 4 8% 23 46% 23 46% 2.38


methods 1 0 0% 0 0% 18 37% 31 63% 2.63




evidenced 3 0 0% 3 6% 21 45% 23 49% 2.43


lesson 4 0 0% 2 4% 21 46% 23 50% 2.46


necessary 0 0 0% 0 0% 15 30% 35 70% 2.70







improvement 0 0 0% 1 2% 11 22% 38 76% 2.74



supervisor 0 0 0% 0 0% 9 18% 41 82% 2.82


Mid-Point Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 1st Placement Mid-Level Supervisors

Competency N/A

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average


subject 0 0 0% 0 0% 3 23% 10 77% 2.77


needs/interests 0 0 0% 2 15% 4 31% 7 54% 2.38


pedagogy 0 0 0% 0 0% 6 46% 7 54% 2.54


resources 0 0 0% 0 0% 5 38% 8 62% 2.62


instruction 0 0 0% 2 15% 7 54% 4 31% 2.15


environment 0 0 0% 0 0% 5 38% 8 62% 2.62


students 0 0 0% 0 0% 2 15% 11 85% 2.85


efficiently 0 0 0% 1 8% 6 46% 6 46% 2.38



groups 0 0 0% 1 8% 6 46% 6 46% 2.38


strategies 0 0 0% 2 15% 5 38% 6 46% 2.31



content 2 0 0% 1 9% 4 36% 6 55% 2.45




response time 0 0 0% 1 8% 6 46% 6 46% 2.38


accurately 0 0 0% 0 0% 7 54% 6 46% 2.46



reinforcement 0 0 0% 1 8% 6 46% 6 46% 2.38

Mid-Point Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 1st Placement Mid-Level Supervisors

Competency N/A

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average


methods 0 0 0% 0 0% 5 38% 8 62% 2.62





lesson 2 0 0% 2 18% 4 36% 5 45% 2.27


necessary 0 0 0% 1 8% 3 23% 9 69% 2.62







improvement 0 0 0% 1 8% 3 23% 9 69% 2.62



supervisor 0 0 0% 0 0% 3 23% 10 77% 2.77


Mid-Point Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 1st Placement PK-4 Supervisor

Competency N/A

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average


and subject 0 0 0% 0 0% 17 34% 33 66% 2.66


needs/interests 0 0 0% 8 16% 17 34% 25 50% 2.34


pedagogy 0 0 0% 0 0% 31 62% 19 38% 2.38


resources 0 0 0% 2 4% 25 50% 23 46% 2.42


instruction 1 0 0% 6 12% 23 47% 20 41% 2.29


environment 0 0 0% 0 0% 19 38% 31 62% 2.62


students 0 0 0% 0 0% 15 30% 35 70% 2.70


efficiently 1 0 0% 9 18% 23 47% 17 35% 2.16



groups 4 0 0% 3 7% 23 50% 20 43% 2.37


strategies 1 0 0% 6 12% 27 55% 16 33% 2.20



content 5 0 0% 2 4% 24 53% 19 42% 2.38




response time 1 0 0% 5 10% 26 53% 18 37% 2.27


accurately 1 0 0% 3 6% 24 49% 22 45% 2.39



reinforcement 0 0 0% 7 14% 22 44% 21 42% 2.28

Mid-Point Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 1st Placement PK-4 Supervisor

Competency N/A

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average


methods 0 0 0% 2 4% 17 34% 31 62% 2.58




evidenced 6 0 0% 1 2% 23 52% 20 45% 2.43


lesson 6 0 0% 2 5% 22 50% 20 45% 2.41


necessary 0 0 0% 0 0% 14 28% 36 72% 2.72







improvement 0 0 0% 1 2% 11 22% 38 76% 2.74



supervisor 0 0 0% 0 0% 11 22% 39 78% 2.78


Final Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 2nd Placement Mid-Level Supervisor

Competency N/A

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average


subject 0 0 0% 0 0% 3 23% 10 77% 2.77


needs/interests 0 0 0% 0 0% 5 38% 8 62% 2.62


pedagogy 0 0 0% 0 0% 5 38% 8 62% 2.62


resources 0 0 0% 0 0% 3 23% 10 77% 2.77


instruction 0 0 0% 2 15% 4 31% 7 54% 2.38


environment 0 0 0% 0 0% 2 15% 11 85% 2.85


students 0 0 0% 0 0% 2 15% 11 85% 2.85


efficiently 0 0 0% 1 8% 2 15% 10 77% 2.69



groups 0 0 0% 2 15% 2 15% 9 69% 2.54


strategies 0 0 0% 1 8% 1 8% 11 85% 2.77



content 0 0 0% 0 0% 4 31% 9 69% 2.69




response time 0 0 0% 1 8% 4 31% 8 62% 2.54


accurately 0 0 0% 0 0% 4 31% 9 69% 2.69


Final Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 2nd Placement Mid-Level Supervisor

Competency N/A

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average


reinforcement 0 0 0% 2 15% 2 15% 9 69% 2.54


methods 0 0 0% 0 0% 3 23% 10 77% 2.77





lesson 0 0 0% 2 15% 3 23% 8 62% 2.46


necessary 0 0 0% 0 0% 3 23% 10 77% 2.77







improvement 0 0 0% 0 0% 2 15% 11 85% 2.85



supervisor 0 0 0% 0 0% 1 8% 12 92% 2.92


Final Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 2nd Placement PK-4 Supervisor

Competency N/A

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average


and subject 0 0 0% 0 0% 12 24% 38 76% 2.76


needs/interests 0 0 0% 0 0% 13 26% 37 74% 2.74


pedagogy 0 0 0% 0 0% 16 32% 34 68% 2.68


resources 0 0 0% 0 0% 13 26% 37 74% 2.74


instruction 0 0 0% 3 6% 16 32% 31 62% 2.56


environment 0 0 0% 0 0% 10 20% 40 80% 2.80


students 0 0 0% 0 0% 9 18% 41 82% 2.82


efficiently 0 0 0% 2 4% 17 34% 31 62% 2.58



groups 0 0 0% 2 4% 11 22% 37 74% 2.70


strategies 0 0 0% 1 2% 20 40% 29 58% 2.56



content 0 0 0% 3 6% 17 34% 30 60% 2.54




response time 0 0 0% 0 0% 15 30% 35 70% 2.70


accurately 0 0 0% 0 0% 12 24% 38 76% 2.76


Final Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 2nd Placement PK-4 Supervisor

Competency N/A

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average


reinforcement 0 0 0% 1 2% 15 30% 34 68% 2.66


methods 0 0 0% 1 2% 11 22% 38 76% 2.74




evidenced 0 0 0% 4 8% 13 26% 33 66% 2.58


lesson 0 0 0% 2 4% 19 38% 29 58% 2.54


necessary 0 0 0% 0 0% 9 18% 41 82% 2.82







improvement 0 0 0% 0 0% 9 18% 41 82% 2.82



supervisor 0 0 0% 0 0% 8 16% 42 84% 2.84


Mid-Point Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 2nd Placement Mid-Level Supervisor

Competency N/A

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average


subject 0 0 0% 0 0% 1 8% 12 92% 2.92


needs/interests 0 0 0% 0 0% 6 46% 7 54% 2.54


pedagogy 0 0 0% 0 0% 6 46% 7 54% 2.54


resources 0 0 0% 0 0% 2 15% 11 85% 2.85


instruction 0 0 0% 2 15% 4 31% 7 54% 2.38


environment 0 0 0% 0 0% 2 15% 11 85% 2.85


students 0 0 0% 0 0% 3 23% 10 77% 2.77


efficiently 0 0 0% 0 0% 4 31% 9 69% 2.69



groups 1 0 0% 0 0% 2 17% 10 83% 2.83


strategies 0 0 0% 0 0% 5 38% 8 62% 2.62



content 0 0 0% 2 15% 3 23% 8 62% 2.46




response time 0 0 0% 1 8% 4 31% 8 62% 2.54


accurately 0 0 0% 1 8% 2 15% 10 77% 2.69


Mid-Point Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 2nd Placement Mid-Level Supervisor

Competency N/A

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average


reinforcement 0 0 0% 2 15% 3 23% 8 62% 2.46


methods 0 0 0% 0 0% 2 15% 11 85% 2.85





lesson 1 0 0% 1 8% 4 33% 7 58% 2.50


necessary 0 0 0% 0 0% 2 15% 11 85% 2.85







improvement 0 0 0% 0 0% 2 15% 11 85% 2.85



supervisor 0 0 0% 0 0% 1 8% 12 92% 2.92


Mid-Point Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 2nd Placement PK-4 Supervisor

Competency N/A

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average


and subject 0 0 0% 1 2% 10 20% 39 78% 2.76


needs/interests 0 0 0% 4 8% 15 30% 31 62% 2.54


pedagogy 0 0 0% 2 4% 19 38% 29 58% 2.54


resources 0 0 0% 2 4% 13 26% 35 70% 2.66


instruction 0 0 0% 4 8% 18 36% 28 56% 2.48


environment 0 0 0% 1 2% 11 22% 38 76% 2.74


students 0 0 0% 1 2% 10 20% 39 78% 2.76


efficiently 0 0 0% 3 6% 22 44% 25 50% 2.44

2.4 Monitors and responds to student

behavior 0 0 0% 1 2% 17 34% 32 64% 2.62


groups 2 0 0% 2 4% 15 31% 31 65% 2.60


strategies 0 0 0% 2 4% 18 36% 30 60% 2.56

3.1 Communicates clear learning

expectations 0 0 0% 5 10% 11 22% 34 68% 2.58


content 0 0 0% 7 14% 14 28% 29 58% 2.44




response time 0 0 0% 0 0% 22 44% 28 56% 2.56


accurately 0 0 0% 1 2% 12 24% 37 74% 2.72


Mid-Point Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 2nd Placement PK-4 Supervisor

Competency N/A

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average


reinforcement 0 0 0% 2 4% 15 30% 33 66% 2.62


methods 0 0 0% 1 2% 11 22% 38 76% 2.74




evidenced 0 0 0% 6 12% 12 24% 32 64% 2.52

3.12 Assessment is made at the conclusion of

a lesson 0 0 0% 4 8% 19 38% 27 54% 2.46

3.13 Lesson plan is followed and adjusted

when necessary 0 0 0% 0 0% 11 22% 39 78% 2.78




4.3 Follows rules and policies of the

institution 0 0 0% 0 0% 10 20% 40 80% 2.80



improvement 0 0 0% 1 2% 10 20% 39 78% 2.76

4.6 Works effectively with cooperating

teacher 1 0 0% 2 4% 8 16% 39 80% 2.76


supervisor 0 0 0% 1 2% 8 16% 41 82% 2.80


Lesson Plan Evaluation Spring 2015 Mid-Level

Competency

-not

set-

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average

LESSON_PLAN

1.1 Standard(s) / Anchors 0 0 0% 1 8% 3 25% 8 67% 2.58

LESSON_PLAN

1.2 Instructional Objectives 0 1 8% 1 8% 2 17% 8 67% 2.42

LESSON_PLAN

1.3 Essential Questions (EQ) 0 0 0% 0 0% 4 33% 8 67% 2.67

LESSON_PLAN

1.4

Formative and Summative

Assessment 0 1 8% 1 8% 2 17% 8 67% 2.42

LESSON_PLAN

1.5 Introduction 0 0 0% 0 0% 5 42% 7 58% 2.58

LESSON_PLAN

1.6 Teaching Procedures 0 1 8% 0 0% 4 33% 7 58% 2.42

LESSON_PLAN

1.7 Closure 0 1 8% 1 8% 2 17% 8 67% 2.42

LESSON_PLAN

1.8

Differentiated Learning

Activities 0 2 17% 0 0% 2 17% 8 67% 2.33

LESSON_PLAN

1.9

Instructional Resources,

Materials, and Technology 0 0 0% 2 17% 3 25% 7 58% 2.42

LESSON_PLAN

1.10

Post-Lesson Reflection /

Analysis 0 0 0% 2 17% 3 25% 7 58% 2.42

Lesson Plan Evaluation Spring 2015 PK-4

Competency

-not

set-

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average

LESSON_PLAN

1.1 Standard(s) / Anchors 0 0 0% 1 2% 13 26% 36 72% 2.70

LESSON_PLAN

1.2 Instructional Objectives 0 0 0% 5 10% 16 32% 29 58% 2.48

LESSON_PLAN

1.3 Essential Questions (EQ) 0 2 4% 2 4% 13 26% 33 66% 2.54

LESSON_PLAN

1.4

Formative and Summative

Assessment 0 0 0% 5 10% 14 28% 31 62% 2.52

LESSON_PLAN

1.5 Introduction 0 0 0% 1 2% 18 36% 31 62% 2.60

LESSON_PLAN

1.6 Teaching Procedures 0 0 0% 2 4% 14 28% 34 68% 2.64

LESSON_PLAN

1.7 Closure 0 1 2% 3 6% 15 30% 31 62% 2.52

LESSON_PLAN

1.8

Differentiated Learning

Activities 0 2 4% 3 6% 13 26% 32 64% 2.50

LESSON_PLAN

1.9

Instructional Resources,

Materials, and Technology 0 0 0% 2 4% 16 32% 32 64% 2.60

LESSON_PLAN

1.10

Post-Lesson Reflection /

Analysis 0 6 12% 4 8% 10 20% 30 60% 2.28

Teacher Disposition Checklist Spring 2015 Mid-Level Supervisor

Competency

Not

set.

(-1)

No

experience

(0)

Infrequently

(1)

Sometimes

(2)

Often

(3)

Always

(4) Average

TDC

1.1

Complies with university and school

district policies and procedures (e.g.,

meets expectations, produces quality

work, exhibits academic honesty,

demonstrates good citizenship)

0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100% 4.00

TDC

1.2

Adheres to local, state and federal rules

and laws (e.g., creates a safe

environment for students, demonstrates

ethical conduct, maintains professional

relationships)

0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100% 4.00

TDC

1.3

Communicates with honesty and

integrity (e.g., uses appropriate

language, maintains confidentiality,

treats all people with respect and dignity)

0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100% 4.00

TDC

1.4

Displays a professional demeanor (e.g.,

dresses appropriately, meets attendance

expectations, actively participates in

class)

0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100% 4.00

TDC

1.5

Adheres to all professional standards,

including the use of technologies (e.g.,

accesses authorized websites, uses

personal electronic devices as

appropriate)

0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100% 4.00

TDC

1.6

Exhibits fair treatment of students,

colleagues, professionals, staff, and

families (e.g., promotes social justice,

exhibits fairness in assessing students’

interactions with others)

0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100% 4.00

TDC

1.7

Interacts with sensitivity to community

and cultural norms (race, ethnicity, age,

gender, sexual orientation,

ability/disability, and social economic

status)

0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 17% 10 83% 3.83

TDC

1.8

Values and responds to all aspects of a

child’s well-being (cognitive, emotional,

psychological, social and physical)

0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100% 4.00

TDC

1.9

Utilizes a full range of differentiated

instructional practices (e.g., considers 0 0 0% 0 0% 2 17% 4 33% 6 50% 3.33


Competency

Not

set.

(-1)

No

experience

(0)

Infrequently

(1)

Sometimes

(2)

Often

(3)

Always

(4) Average

students’ strengths, needs and

experiences when planning instruction,

uses flexible groupings for instruction,

provides opportunities for all students to

succeed)

TDC

1.10

Meets professional expectations (e.g.,

seeks help in a timely manner,

completes assignments on time,

participates equitably in teamwork, is

punctual, follows procedures for

extensions)

0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100% 4.00

TDC

1.11

Considers and responds to multiple

perspectives (e.g., incorporates

professional feedback and constructive

suggestions)

0 0 0% 0 0% 1 8% 0 0% 11 92% 3.83

TDC

1.12

Demonstrates kind, caring and

respectful interactions with others (e.g.,

maintains emotional control, responds

appropriately to actions and reactions of

others, adapts to unexpected or new

situations, acts from a positive frame of

reference)

0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100% 4.00

TDC

1.13

Utilizes professional oral and written

communication based on the purpose

and audience (e.g., employs suitable

tone of voice, and verbal and nonverbal

expressions, uses grammatically correct

sentences, exercises appropriate self-

disclosure)

0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100% 4.00

TDC

1.14

Accepts responsibility for personal

actions or decisions (e.g., shows an

understanding of policies and

procedures for professional behaviors

and dispositions)

0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100% 4.00

TDC

1.15

Solves problems proactively (e.g.,

recognizes problems and seeks

resolutions, collaborates and problem

solves with others)

0 0 0% 0 0% 1 8% 0 0% 11 92% 3.83


Competency

Not

set.

(-1)

No

experience

(0)

Infrequently

(1)

Sometimes

(2)

Often

(3)

Always

(4) Average

TDC

1.16

Seeks clarification and assistance as

needed (e.g., seeks and utilizes human

and material resources)

0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 17% 10 83% 3.83

TDC

1.17

Engages in processes of continuous

reflection based on relevant assessment

data (e.g., utilizes systematic reflection

processes for problem-solving and

modifying educational practices)

0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 17% 10 83% 3.83

TDC

1.18

Completes assigned tasks that

demonstrate high personal and

professional standards

0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 12 100% 4.00

TDC

1.19

Seeks to keep abreast of new ideas,

evidence-based practices, and

understandings in the field to improve

instructional practices and teaching

activities (e.g., reads educational

journals, attends professional meetings

and conferences, and engages in

professional discussions with others)

0 2 17% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 10 83% 3.33

TDC

1.20

Demonstrates positive attitude towards

learning through intellectual curiosity

and participation in professionally-

related experiences (e.g., actively

participates in class activities and

professionally-related associations,

exceeds expectations for assignments,

tasks and teamwork)

0 2 17% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 10 83% 3.33

TDC

1.21

Reflects upon teaching practices (e.g.,

identifies areas of strengths and needs,

engages in professional development

based upon self-reflections)

0 0 0% 1 8% 1 8% 1 8% 9 75% 3.50

Teacher Disposition Checklist Spring 2015 PK-4 Supervisor

Competency

Not

set.

(-1)

No

experience

(0)

Infrequently

(1)

Sometimes

(2)

Often

(3)

Always

(4) Average

TDC

1.1

Complies with university and school

district policies and procedures (e.g.,

meets expectations, produces quality



0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 3 6% 47 94% 3.94

TDC

1.2

Adheres to local, state and federal rules

and laws (e.g., creates a safe

environment for students, demonstrates

ethical conduct, maintains professional

relationships)

0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 4% 48 96% 3.96

TDC

1.3

Communicates with honesty and


language, maintains confidentiality,

treats all people with respect and dignity)

0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 3 6% 47 94% 3.94

TDC

1.4

Displays a professional demeanor (e.g.,

dresses appropriately, meets attendance

expectations, actively participates in

class)

0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 3 6% 47 94% 3.94

TDC

1.5

Adheres to all professional standards,

including the use of technologies (e.g.,

accesses authorized websites, uses

personal electronic devices as

appropriate)

0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 4% 48 96% 3.96

TDC

1.6

Exhibits fair treatment of students,

colleagues, professionals, staff, and

families (e.g., promotes social justice,

exhibits fairness in assessing students’

interactions with others)

0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 4% 48 96% 3.96

TDC

1.7

Interacts with sensitivity to community

and cultural norms (race, ethnicity, age,

gender, sexual orientation,

ability/disability, and social economic

status)

0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 7 14% 43 86% 3.86

TDC

1.8

Values and responds to all aspects of a

child’s well-being (cognitive, emotional,


0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 4 8% 46 92% 3.92

TDC

1.9

Utilizes a full range of differentiated

instructional practices (e.g., considers 0 0 0% 0 0% 6 12% 13 26% 31 62% 3.50


Competency

Not

set.

(-1)

No

experience

(0)

Infrequently

(1)

Sometimes

(2)

Often

(3)

Always

(4) Average

students’ strengths, needs and

experiences when planning instruction,

uses flexible groupings for instruction,

provides opportunities for all students to

succeed)

TDC

1.10

Meets professional expectations (e.g.,

seeks help in a timely manner,

completes assignments on time,

participates equitably in teamwork, is

punctual, follows procedures for

extensions)

0 0 0% 0 0% 1 2% 3 6% 46 92% 3.90

TDC

1.11

Considers and responds to multiple

perspectives (e.g., incorporates

professional feedback and constructive

suggestions)

0 0 0% 0 0% 1 2% 3 6% 46 92% 3.90

TDC

1.12

Demonstrates kind, caring and

respectful interactions with others (e.g.,

maintains emotional control, responds

appropriately to actions and reactions of

others, adapts to unexpected or new

situations, acts from a positive frame of

reference)

0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 4 8% 46 92% 3.92

TDC

1.13

Utilizes professional oral and written

communication based on the purpose

and audience (e.g., employs suitable

tone of voice, and verbal and nonverbal

expressions, uses grammatically correct

sentences, exercises appropriate self-

disclosure)

0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 4 8% 46 92% 3.92

TDC

1.14

Accepts responsibility for personal

actions or decisions (e.g., shows an

understanding of policies and

procedures for professional behaviors

and dispositions)

0 0 0% 0 0% 1 2% 2 4% 47 94% 3.92

TDC

1.15

Solves problems proactively (e.g.,

recognizes problems and seeks

resolutions, collaborates and problem

solves with others)

0 0 0% 0 0% 1 2% 5 10% 44 88% 3.86


Competency

Not

set.

(-1)

No

experience

(0)

Infrequently

(1)

Sometimes

(2)

Often

(3)

Always

(4) Average

TDC

1.16

Seeks clarification and assistance as

needed (e.g., seeks and utilizes human

and material resources)

0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 5 10% 45 90% 3.90

TDC

1.17

Engages in processes of continuous

reflection based on relevant assessment

data (e.g., utilizes systematic reflection



0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 4 8% 46 92% 3.92

TDC

1.18

Completes assigned tasks that



0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 3 6% 47 94% 3.94

TDC

1.19

Seeks to keep abreast of new ideas,

evidence-based practices, and

understandings in the field to improve

instructional practices and teaching

activities (e.g., reads educational

journals, attends professional meetings

and conferences, and engages in

professional discussions with others)

0 9 18% 0 0% 0 0% 3 6% 38 76% 3.22

TDC

1.20

Demonstrates positive attitude towards

learning through intellectual curiosity

and participation in professionally-




exceeds expectations for assignments,

tasks and teamwork)

0 9 18% 0 0% 0 0% 2 4% 39 78% 3.24

TDC

1.21

Reflects upon teaching practices (e.g.,

identifies areas of strengths and needs,

engages in professional development

based upon self-reflections)

0 0 0% 1 2% 1 2% 4 8% 44 88% 3.82

Unit Plan Evaluation Spring 2015 Mid-Level

Competency

-not

set-

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average

UNITPLAN

1.1 Introduction / General Information 0 0 0% 1 8% 0 0% 11 92% 2.83

UNITPLAN

1.2 Academic Standards / Anchors 0 0 0% 0 0% 1 8% 11 92% 2.92

UNITPLAN

1.3 Unit Goals 0 1 8% 1 8% 1 8% 9 75% 2.50

UNITPLAN

1.4 Essential Questions (EQs) 0 0 0% 0 0% 1 8% 11 92% 2.92

UNITPLAN

1.5

Pre-Assessment:

Completed at the start of the unit to determine the baseline of student knowledge

and competencies. Use pre-assessment data when analyzing student learning and

teaching at the end of the Unit plan reflection.

0 1 8% 0 0% 1 8% 10 83% 2.67

UNITPLAN

1.6 Content - Daily Lesson Plan (Use the prescribed lesson plan format) 0 0 0% 1 8% 1 8% 10 83% 2.75

UNITPLAN

1.7

Integration of Resources and Technology:

List all materials, resources and technology (e.g., multimedia, technology, lab

equipment, outside expert) utilized in the instruction of the unit. If technology is

excluded, provide an instructionally sound rationale for its absence.

0 0 0% 1 8% 3 25% 8 67% 2.58

UNITPLAN

1.8

Differentiated Learning Activities:

Include research-based strategies that challenge all learners. Include context of the

learners as a rationale for differentiation:

• Describe important characteristics of the learners in your classroom: number of

learners and gender, race/ethnicity, school socio-economic status, special needs,

and language proficiency (as defined by Field Experience Diversity Requirements).

0 0 0% 2 17% 3 25% 7 58% 2.42

Unit Plan Evaluation Spring 2015 Mid-Level

Competency

-not

set-

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average

• Explain the specific activities that differentiate the content, process, product,

and/or learning environment designed to provide advanced achievement for all

learners.

• Explain the accommodations made for learners with disabilities (IEPs).

Differentiation within the unit plan for a university course is up to the discretion of

the professor (e.g., simulation experience).

UNITPLAN

1.9

Summative Assessment / Post-Assessment

Related directly to pre-assessment to evaluate degree of student learning after unit

is taught and which match unit goals and lesson plan objectives. Summative

assessments include chapter/unit tests, writing projects, quizzes, or ongoing

projects, etc.

0 0 0% 0 0% 2 17% 10 83% 2.83

UNITPLAN

1.10

Reflection

Completed after implementation of unit plan: Utilize pre-assessment data to assist

your reflection. Within a university course, provide questions you may pose to

yourself for evaluating student learning and your instructional decisions.

• ANALYSIS OF STUDENT LEARNING: Analyze assessment data and

documented evidence of lesson results and explain to what degree instructional

decisions made an impact on student learning and achievement of unit goals and

lesson objectives.

• ANALYSIS OF TEACHING: Include modifications/recommendations of current

instruction for future application on 1) planning and preparation, 2) classroom

environments, 3) instruction, and 4) professional responsibilities as related to

instructional objectives or standards.

0 0 0% 2 17% 1 8% 9 75% 2.58

Unit Plan Evaluation Spring 2015 PK-4

Competency

-not

set-

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average

UNITPLAN

1.1 Introduction / General Information 0 1 2% 5 10% 5 10% 39 78% 2.64

UNITPLAN

1.2 Academic Standards / Anchors 0 1 2% 2 4% 7 14% 40 80% 2.72

UNITPLAN

1.3 Unit Goals 0 1 2% 7 14% 5 10% 37 74% 2.56

UNITPLAN

1.4 Essential Questions (EQs) 0 0 0% 2 4% 10 20% 38 76% 2.72

UNITPLAN

1.5

Pre-Assessment:

Completed at the start of the unit to determine the baseline of student

knowledge and competencies. Use pre-assessment data when analyzing

student learning and teaching at the end of the Unit plan reflection.

0 1 2% 2 4% 7 14% 40 80% 2.72

UNITPLAN

1.6 Content - Daily Lesson Plan (Use the prescribed lesson plan format) 0 0 0% 1 2% 9 18% 40 80% 2.78

UNITPLAN

1.7

Integration of Resources and Technology:

List all materials, resources and technology (e.g., multimedia, technology, lab

equipment, outside expert) utilized in the instruction of the unit. If technology

is excluded, provide an instructionally sound rationale for its absence.

0 1 2% 5 10% 9 18% 35 70% 2.56

UNITPLAN

1.8

Differentiated Learning Activities:

Include research-based strategies that challenge all learners. Include context

of the learners as a rationale for differentiation:

• Describe important characteristics of the learners in your classroom:

number of learners and gender, race/ethnicity, school socio-economic status,

special needs, and language proficiency (as defined by Field Experience

Diversity Requirements).

• Explain the specific activities that differentiate the content, process,

0 1 2% 5 10% 13 26% 31 62% 2.48

Unit Plan Evaluation Spring 2015 PK-4

Competency

-not

set-

(-1)

Unsatisfactory

(0)

Basic

(1)

Proficient

(2)

Distinguished

(3) Average

product, and/or learning environment designed to provide advanced

achievement for all learners.

• Explain the accommodations made for learners with disabilities (IEPs).

Differentiation within the unit plan for a university course is up to the

discretion of the professor (e.g., simulation experience).

UNITPLAN

1.9

Summative Assessment / Post-Assessment

Related directly to pre-assessment to evaluate degree of student learning

after unit is taught and which match unit goals and lesson plan objectives.

Summative assessments include chapter/unit tests, writing projects, quizzes,

or ongoing projects, etc.

0 4 8% 5 10% 11 22% 30 60% 2.34

UNITPLAN

1.10

Reflection

Completed after implementation of unit plan: Utilize pre-assessment data to

assist your reflection. Within a university course, provide questions you may

pose to yourself for evaluating student learning and your instructional

decisions.

• ANALYSIS OF STUDENT LEARNING: Analyze assessment data and

documented evidence of lesson results and explain to what degree

instructional decisions made an impact on student learning and achievement

of unit goals and lesson objectives.

• ANALYSIS OF TEACHING: Include modifications/recommendations of

current instruction for future application on 1) planning and preparation, 2)

classroom environments, 3) instruction, and 4) professional responsibilities

as related to instructional objectives or standards.

0 4 8% 5 10% 8 16% 33 66% 2.40

Post Student Teaching Survey Spring 2015 PK-4 Teacher Candidate

Competency

-not

set-

(-1)

Strongly

Disagree

(0)

Disagree

(1)

Agree

(2)

Strongly

Agree

(3)

Average

ES

1.1

Become familiar with relevant aspects of

students’ background knowledge and

experiences

0 1 4% 0 0% 1 4% 21 91% 2.83

ES

1.2

Articulate clear learning goals for

lessons that are appropriate for the

students

0 1 4% 0 0% 1 4% 21 91% 2.83

ES

1.3

Demonstrate an understanding of the

connections between course content for

students that was learned previously, the

current content, and the content that

remains to be learned in the future

0 1 4% 0 0% 2 9% 20 87% 2.78

ES

1.4

Create or select teaching methods,

learning activities, and instructional

materials or other resources that are

appropriate for the students and that are

aligned with the academic content

standards

0 1 4% 0 0% 2 9% 20 87% 2.78

ES

1.5

Create or select evaluation strategies that

are appropriate for the students and that

are aligned with the academic content

standards

0 1 4% 0 0% 6 26% 16 70% 2.61

ES

1.6

Create a learning climate that promotes

fairness 0 1 4% 0 0% 3 13% 19 83% 2.74

ES

1.7

Establish and maintain rapport with

students 0 1 4% 0 0% 4 17% 18 78% 2.70

ES

1.8

Communicate challenging learning

expectations to each student 0 1 4% 0 0% 6 26% 16 70% 2.61

ES

1.9

Establish and maintain consistent

standards of appropriate student

behavior

0 1 4% 0 0% 4 17% 18 78% 2.70

ES

1.10

Make the physical environment safe and

conducive to learning 0 1 4% 0 0% 2 9% 20 87% 2.78

ES

1.11

Make learning goals and instructional

procedures clear to all students 0 1 4% 0 0% 4 17% 18 78% 2.70

ES

1.12

Make curriculum content understandable

for students 0 1 4% 0 0% 6 26% 16 70% 2.61


Competency

-not

set-

(-1)

Strongly

Disagree

(0)

Disagree

(1)

Agree

(2)

Strongly

Agree

(3)

Average

ES

1.13

Monitor student progress through

demonstrations of their understanding of

content through a variety of means,

providing feedback to students to assist

learning, and adjusting learning activities

as the situation demands

0 1 4% 0 0% 2 9% 20 87% 2.78

ES

1.14 Use instructional time effectively 0 1 4% 0 0% 2 9% 20 87% 2.78

ES

1.15

Encourage students to extend their

analytical and critical thinking 0 1 4% 0 0% 6 26% 16 70% 2.61

ES

1.16

Reflect on the extent to which the

learning goals for students have been

met

0 1 4% 0 0% 3 13% 19 83% 2.74

ES

1.17

Effectively teach students across

relevant settings 0 1 4% 0 0% 3 13% 19 83% 2.74

ES

1.18

Build professional relationships with

colleagues to share teaching insights,

coordinate learning activities for

students, and collaboratively solve

problems

0 1 4% 0 0% 3 13% 19 83% 2.74

ES

1.19

Communicate with parents or guardians

about student learning 0 1 4% 0 0% 9 39% 13 57% 2.48

ES

1.20

Differentiate instruction to address

student diversity 0 1 4% 1 4% 5 22% 16 70% 2.57

ES

1.21

Integrate technology into teaching and

learning 0 1 4% 0 0% 4 17% 18 78% 2.70

ES

1.22

Demonstrate appropriate professional

behaviors 0 1 4% 0 0% 1 4% 21 91% 2.83

ES

1.23

Have a positive impact on student

learning 0 1 4% 0 0% 1 4% 21 91% 2.83

ES

1.24

Have a positive impact due to knowledge

and skill of classroom management 0 1 4% 0 0% 2 9% 20 87% 2.78

ES

1.25


and skill of discipline 0 1 4% 0 0% 2 9% 20 87% 2.78

ES

1.26


and skill of planning 0 1 4% 0 0% 2 9% 20 87% 2.78


Competency

-not

set-

(-1)

Strongly

Disagree

(0)

Disagree

(1)

Agree

(2)

Strongly

Agree

(3)

Average

ES

1.27


and skill of implementing instruction 0 1 4% 0 0% 2 9% 20 87% 2.78

ES

1.28


and skill of assessing instruction 0 1 4% 0 0% 3 13% 19 83% 2.74

ES

1.29


and skill of reflecting on student learning 0 1 4% 0 0% 3 13% 19 83% 2.74

ES

1.30


and skill of differentiating for student

differences

0 1 4% 0 0% 4 17% 18 78% 2.70

ES

1.31

My teacher preparation program enabled

me to have a positive impact due to

knowledge and skills other than those

listed above

0 1 4% 0 0% 7 30% 15 65% 2.57

Post Student Teaching Survey Spring 2015 Mid-Level Teacher Candidate

Competency

-not

set-

(-1)

Strongly

Disagree

(0)

Disagree

(1)

Agree

(2)

Strongly

Agree

(3)

Average

ES

1.1



experiences

0 0 0% 0 0% 1 17% 5 83% 2.83

ES

1.2



students

0 0 0% 0 0% 2 33% 4 67% 2.67

ES

1.3






0 0 0% 0 0% 2 33% 4 67% 2.67

ES

1.4






standards

0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 6 100% 3.00

ES

1.5




standards

0 0 0% 0 0% 2 33% 4 67% 2.67

ES

1.6


fairness 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 6 100% 3.00

ES

1.7


students 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 6 100% 3.00

ES

1.8



ES

1.9



behavior

0 0 0% 0 0% 1 17% 5 83% 2.83

ES

1.10



ES

1.11



ES

1.12


for students 0 0 0% 0 0% 2 33% 4 67% 2.67


Competency

-not

set-

(-1)

Strongly

Disagree

(0)

Disagree

(1)

Agree

(2)

Strongly

Agree

(3)

Average

ES

1.13







0 0 0% 0 0% 2 33% 4 67% 2.67

ES


ES

1.15



ES

1.16



met

0 0 0% 0 0% 2 33% 4 67% 2.67

ES

1.17



ES

1.18





problems

0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 6 100% 3.00

ES

1.19



ES

1.20



ES

1.21


learning 0 0 0% 0 0% 1 17% 5 83% 2.83

ES

1.22


behaviors 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 6 100% 3.00

ES

1.23


learning 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 6 100% 3.00

ES

1.24



ES

1.25



ES

1.26




Competency

-not

set-

(-1)

Strongly

Disagree

(0)

Disagree

(1)

Agree

(2)

Strongly

Agree

(3)

Average

ES

1.27



ES

1.28



ES

1.29



ES

1.30



differences

0 0 0% 1 17% 1 17% 4 67% 2.50

ES

1.31




listed above

0 0 0% 0 0% 1 17% 5 83% 2.83

Pre-Survey Student Teaching Spring 2015 Mid-Level Teacher Candidate

Competency

-not

set-

(-1)

Strongly

Disagree

(0)

Disagree

(1)

Agree

(2)

Strongly

Agree

(3)

Average

ES

1.1



experiences

0 0 0% 0 0% 8 67% 4 33% 2.33

ES

1.2



students

0 0 0% 0 0% 6 50% 6 50% 2.50

ES

1.3






0 0 0% 1 8% 6 50% 5 42% 2.33

ES

1.4






standards

0 0 0% 0 0% 4 33% 8 67% 2.67

ES

1.5




standards

0 0 0% 2 17% 6 50% 4 33% 2.17

ES

1.6


fairness 0 0 0% 1 8% 5 42% 6 50% 2.42

ES

1.7


students 0 0 0% 0 0% 5 42% 7 58% 2.58

ES

1.8



ES

1.9



behavior

1 0 0% 1 9% 6 55% 4 36% 2.27

ES

1.10



ES

1.11



ES

1.12


for students 0 0 0% 0 0% 6 50% 6 50% 2.50


Competency

-not

set-

(-1)

Strongly

Disagree

(0)

Disagree

(1)

Agree

(2)

Strongly

Agree

(3)

Average

ES

1.13







0 0 0% 0 0% 6 50% 6 50% 2.50

ES


ES

1.15



ES

1.16



met

0 0 0% 0 0% 9 75% 3 25% 2.25

ES

1.17



ES

1.18





problems

0 0 0% 2 17% 5 42% 5 42% 2.25

ES

1.19



ES

1.20



ES

1.21


learning 0 0 0% 0 0% 6 50% 6 50% 2.50

ES

1.22


behaviors 0 0 0% 0 0% 2 17% 10 83% 2.83

ES

1.23


learning 0 0 0% 0 0% 2 17% 10 83% 2.83

ES

1.24



ES

1.25



ES

1.26




Competency

-not

set-

(-1)

Strongly

Disagree

(0)

Disagree

(1)

Agree

(2)

Strongly

Agree

(3)

Average

ES

1.27



ES

1.28



ES

1.29



ES

1.30



differences

0 0 0% 1 8% 8 67% 3 25% 2.17

ES

1.31




listed above

0 1 8% 4 33% 2 17% 5 42% 1.92

Pre-Survey Student Teaching Spring 2015 PK-4 Teacher Candidates

Competency

-not

set-

(-1)

Strongly

Disagree

(0)

Disagree

(1)

Agree

(2)

Strongly

Agree

(3)

Average

ES

1.1



experiences

1 1 2% 1 2% 22 48% 22 48% 2.41

ES

1.2



students

1 1 2% 1 2% 23 50% 21 46% 2.39

ES

1.3



students that was learned previously,

the current content, and the content that


1 1 2% 0 0% 27 59% 18 39% 2.35

ES

1.4






standards

1 1 2% 2 4% 20 43% 23 50% 2.41

ES

1.5

Create or select evaluation strategies

that are appropriate for the students and

that are aligned with the academic

content standards

1 1 2% 1 2% 27 59% 17 37% 2.30

ES

1.6


fairness 1 1 2% 2 4% 24 52% 19 41% 2.33

ES

1.7


students 1 1 2% 0 0% 14 30% 31 67% 2.63

ES

1.8



ES

1.9



behavior

1 2 4% 2 4% 27 59% 15 33% 2.20

ES

1.10



ES

1.11



ES

1.12

Make curriculum content

understandable for students 1 1 2% 3 7% 22 48% 20 43% 2.33


Competency

-not

set-

(-1)

Strongly

Disagree

(0)

Disagree

(1)

Agree

(2)

Strongly

Agree

(3)

Average

ES

1.13


demonstrations of their understanding

of content through a variety of means,


learning, and adjusting learning

activities as the situation demands

1 1 2% 1 2% 21 46% 23 50% 2.43

ES


ES

1.15



ES

1.16



met

1 2 4% 4 9% 26 57% 14 30% 2.13

ES

1.17



ES

1.18





problems

1 1 2% 3 7% 20 43% 22 48% 2.37

ES

1.19



ES

1.20



ES

1.21


learning 1 4 9% 4 9% 17 37% 21 46% 2.20

ES

1.22


behaviors 1 1 2% 0 0% 12 26% 33 72% 2.67

ES

1.23


learning 1 1 2% 1 2% 11 24% 33 72% 2.65

ES

1.24

Have a positive impact due to

knowledge and skill of classroom

management

1 1 2% 4 9% 22 48% 19 41% 2.28

ES

1.25


knowledge and skill of discipline 1 1 2% 5 11% 25 54% 15 33% 2.17

ES

1.26


knowledge and skill of planning 1 1 2% 2 4% 28 61% 15 33% 2.24


Competency

-not

set-

(-1)

Strongly

Disagree

(0)

Disagree

(1)

Agree

(2)

Strongly

Agree

(3)

Average

ES

1.27


knowledge and skill of implementing

instruction

1 1 2% 2 4% 28 61% 15 33% 2.24

ES

1.28


knowledge and skill of assessing

instruction

1 1 2% 1 2% 28 61% 16 35% 2.28

ES

1.29


knowledge and skill of reflecting on

student learning

1 1 2% 2 4% 23 50% 20 43% 2.35

ES

1.30


knowledge and skill of differentiating for

student differences

1 2 4% 0 0% 29 63% 15 33% 2.24

ES

1.31

My teacher preparation program

enabled me to have a positive impact

due to knowledge and skills other than

those listed above

1 1 2% 5 11% 21 46% 19 41% 2.26

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Persistence Organization AndPlanning

Values StudentsLearning

Theory To Practice At Risk Students Approach To Students Survive In Bureaucracy Explains TeacherSuccess

Explains StudentSuccess

Fallibility

PersistenceOrganization And

PlanningValues Students Learning Theory To Practice At Risk Students Approach To Students Survive In Bureaucracy Explains Teacher Success Explains Student Success Fallibility

Low 2 16 7 4 14 12 15 15 5 11

Average 4 0 0 6 2 0 0 0 6 3

High 11 1 10 7 1 5 2 2 6 3

1821 - Introducation to Education- Haberman Results - Spring 2015TESTS TAKEN 01/26/2015 - 03/16/2015

Spring 2015 Early Childhood PK-4 Initial Teacher Dispositions

Please identify how often you demonstrate the given Teacher

Dispositions.

# Question Always Often Sometimes Infrequently No

Experience Total

Responses Mean

1

1. Complies with university and school district policies and procedures (e.g., meets expectations, produces quality work, exhibits academic honesty, demonstrates good citizenship)

86.67% 13.33

% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 15 1.13

2

2. Adheres to local, state and federal rules and laws (e.g., creates a safe environment for students, demonstrates ethical conduct, maintains professional relationships)

86.67% 6.67%

0.00% 0.00% 6.67% 15 1.33

3

3. Communicates with honesty and integrity (e.g., uses appropriate language, maintains confidentiality, treats all people with respect and dignity)

93.33% 6.67%

0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 15 1.07

4

4. Displays a professional demeanor (e.g., dresses appropriately, meets attendance expectations, actively participates in class)

73.33% 26.67

% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 15 1.27

5

5. Adheres to all professional standards, including the use of technologies (e.g., accesses authorized websites, uses personal electronic devices as appropriate)

73.33% 20.00

% 0.00% 0.00% 6.67% 15 1.47

6

6. Exhibits fair treatment of students, colleagues, professionals, staff, and families (e.g., promotes social justice, exhibits fairness in assessing students’ interactions with others)

73.33% 13.33

% 0.00% 0.00% 13.33% 15 1.67


7

7. Interacts with sensitivity to community and cultural norms (race, ethnicity, age, gender, sexual orientation, ability/disability, and social economic status)

80.00% 20.00

% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 15 1.20

8

8. Values and responds to all aspects of a child’s well-being (cognitive, emotional, psychological, social and physical)

73.33% 20.00

% 0.00% 0.00% 6.67% 15 1.47

9

9. Utilizes a full range of differentiated instructional practices (e.g., considers students’ strengths, needs and experiences when planning instruction, uses flexible groupings for instruction, provides opportunities for all students to succeed)

46.67% 33.33

% 6.67% 0.00% 13.33% 15 2.00

10

10. Meets professional expectations (e.g., seeks help in a timely manner, completes assignments on time, participates equitably in teamwork, is punctual, follows procedures for extensions)

66.67% 33.33

% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 15 1.33

11

11. Considers and responds to multiple perspectives (e.g., incorporates professional feedback and constructive suggestions)

73.33% 26.67

% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 15 1.27

12

12. Demonstrates kind, caring and respectful interactions with others (e.g., maintains emotional control, responds appropriately to actions and reactions of others, adapts to unexpected or new situations, acts from a positive frame of reference)

86.67% 13.33

% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 15 1.13


13

13. Utilizes professional oral and written communication based on the purpose and audience (e.g., employs suitable tone of voice, and verbal and nonverbal expressions, uses grammatically correct sentences, exercises appropriate self-disclosure)

80.00% 13.33

% 0.00% 0.00% 6.67% 15 1.40

14

14. Accepts responsibility for personal actions or decisions (e.g., shows an understanding of policies and procedures for professional behaviors and dispositions)

86.67% 13.33

% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 15 1.13

15

15. Solves problems proactively (e.g., recognizes problems and seeks resolutions, collaborates and problem solves with others)

60.00% 33.33

% 0.00% 0.00% 6.67% 15 1.60

16

16. Seeks clarification and assistance as needed (e.g., seeks and utilizes human and material resources)

53.33% 46.67

% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 15 1.47

17

17. Engages in processes of continuous reflection based on relevant assessment data (e.g., utilizes systematic reflection processes for problem-solving and modifying educational practices)

46.67% 40.00

% 0.00% 0.00% 13.33% 15 1.93

18

18. Completes assigned tasks that demonstrate high personal and professional standards

73.33% 26.67

% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 15 1.27

19

19. Seeks to keep abreast of new ideas, evidence-based practices, and understandings in the field to improve

40.00% 33.33

% 20.00% 0.00% 6.67% 15 2.00


instructional practices and teaching activities (e.g., reads educational journals, attends professional meetings and conferences, and engages in professional discussions with others)

20

20. Demonstrates positive attitude towards learning through intellectual curiosity and participation in professionally-related experiences (e.g., actively participates in class activities and professionally-related associations, exceeds expectations for assignments, tasks and teamwork)

66.67% 26.67

% 6.67% 0.00% 0.00% 15 1.40

21

21. Reflects upon teaching practices (e.g., identifies areas of strengths and needs, engages in professional development based upon self-reflections)

60.00% 20.00

% 6.67% 0.00% 13.33% 15 1.87

00.5

11.5

22.5

33.5

44.5

5

PersistenceOrganizationAnd Planning

ValuesStudentsLearning

Theory ToPractice

At RiskStudents

Approach ToStudents

Survive InBureaucracy

ExplainsTeacherSuccess

ExplainsStudentSuccess

Fallibility

Low 2 5 4 4 5 5 4 5 3 3

Average 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2

High 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0

1825 - Intro to Mid Level Education- Haberman Results - Spring 2015TESTS TAKEN 01/26/2015 - 03/16/2015

Spring 2015 Middle Level Initial Teacher Dispositions Please identify how often you demonstrate the given Teacher Dispositions.

Question Always Often Sometimes Infrequently No

Experience

Response Average

Value

1 1. Complies with university and

school district policies and

procedures (e.g., meets

expectations, produces quality



75.00% - - - 25.00% 4 2.00

2 2. Adheres to local, state and

federal rules and laws (e.g., creates

a safe environment for students,

demonstrates ethical conduct,

maintains professional

relationships)

75.00% - - - 25.00% 4 2.00

3 3. Communicates with honesty and


language, maintains

confidentiality, treats all people

with respect and dignity)

100.00% - - - - 4 1.00

4 4. Displays a professional

demeanor (e.g., dresses

appropriately, meets attendance

expectations, actively participates

in class)

100.00% - - - - 4 1.00

5 5. Adheres to all professional

standards, including the use of

technologies (e.g., accesses

authorized websites, uses personal

electronic devices as appropriate)

100.00% - - - - 4 1.00

6 6. Exhibits fair treatment of

students, colleagues, professionals,

staff, and families (e.g., promotes

social justice, exhibits fairness in

assessing students’ interactions

with others)

75.00% - - - 25.00% 4 2.00

7 7. Interacts with sensitivity to

community and cultural norms

(race, ethnicity, age, gender,

sexual orientation,

ability/disability, and social

economic status)

100.00% - - - - 4 1.00

8 8. Values and responds to all

aspects of a child’s well-being

(cognitive, emotional,


100.00% - - - - 4 1.00

9 9. Utilizes a full range of

differentiated instructional

practices (e.g., considers students’

strengths, needs and experiences

when planning instruction, uses

flexible groupings for instruction,

provides opportunities for all

students to succeed)

75.00% - - - 25.00% 4 2.00

10 10. Meets professional

expectations (e.g., seeks help in a

timely manner, completes

assignments on time, participates

equitably in teamwork, is punctual, follows procedures for extensions

50.00% 25.00% - - 25.00% 4 2.25


Question Always Often Sometimes Infrequently No

Experience

Response Average

Value

11 11. Considers and responds to

multiple perspectives (e.g.,

incorporates professional feedback

and constructive suggestions)

75.00% - - - 25.00% 4 2.00

12 12. Demonstrates kind, caring and

respectful interactions with others

(e.g., maintains emotional control,

responds appropriately to actions

and reactions of others, adapts to

unexpected or new situations, acts

from a positive frame of reference)

100.00% - - - - 4 1.00

13

13. Utilizes professional oral and

written communication based on

the purpose and audience (e.g.,

employs suitable tone of voice,

and verbal and nonverbal

expressions, uses grammatically

correct sentences, exercises

appropriate self-disclosure)

75.00% 25.00% 4 1.25

14 14. Accepts responsibility for

personal actions or decisions (e.g.,

shows an understanding of policies

and procedures for professional

behaviors and dispositions)

100.00% - - - - 4 1.00

15 15. Solves problems proactively

(e.g., recognizes problems and

seeks resolutions, collaborates and

problem solves with others)

75.00% - 25.00% - - 4 1.50

16 16. Seeks clarification and

assistance as needed (e.g., seeks

and utilizes human and material

resources)

75.00% - - - 25.00% 4 2.00

17 17. Engages in processes of

continuous reflection based on

relevant assessment data (e.g.,

utilizes systematic reflection



75.00% - - - 25.00% 4 2.00

18 18. Completes assigned tasks that



75.00% - 25.00% - - 4 1.50

19 19. Seeks to keep abreast of new

ideas, evidence-based practices,

and understandings in the field to

improve instructional practices and

teaching activities (e.g., reads

educational journals, attends

professional meetings and

conferences, and engages in

professional discussions with

others)

50.00% 25.00% - - 25.00% 4 2.25

20 20. Demonstrates positive attitude

towards learning through

intellectual curiosity and

participation in professionally-



100.00% - - - - 4 1.00



exceeds expectations for

assignments, tasks and teamwork)

21 21. Reflects upon teaching

practices (e.g., identifies areas of

strengths and needs, engages in

professional development based

upon self-reflections)

75.00% - - - 25.00% 4 2.00

Documents

Final Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 1st Placement ......Final Student Teacher Evaluation Spring 2015 1st Placement Mid-Level Cooperating Teachers Competency N/A (-1) Unsatisfactory