Upload
ferdous-mohammed
View
59
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Running head: SAUDI USERS’ PRIVACY PERCEPTION
Privacy and Social Networking: WhatsApp Users’ Perception in Saudi Arabia
Researchers:
Nemah Alsayed
Haifaa Alakel
Ferdous Mohammed
Shaykha Khayat
Safia Bawazeer
BBUS 3201 Fall- 2015/2016
Dar Al-Hekma University
1
Running head: SAUDI USERS’ PRIVACY PERCEPTION
Abstract
This study investigates WhatsApp users’ perceptions of its privacy, identifying the
familiarity of privacy issues and how their actions are influenced by such knowledge, as well as
the role of trust in an online social networking environment. A cross-sectional survey design is
used. The sample frame is a network of WhatsApp friends; 500 survey responses were collected
through snowball method giving a response rate of 100 per cent. The study reveals over half of
WhatsApp’s users have a high level of privacy awareness; however, uncertainty is clear. Privacy
concerns are evident, especially relating to third parties’ access to WhatsApp users’ information.
Over half of users have not changed their privacy settings to tighter controls, even though the
users have shown a large privacy concerns. Users have disclosed a concern regarding the
acquisition of WhatsApp by Facebook, yet, privacy settings were not changing. One-quarter of
users trust WhatsApp, yet over half of users believe that they are obliged to protect their own
information.
2
Running head: SAUDI USERS’ PRIVACY PERCEPTION
Table of Content
Introduction 4
Literature Review 4
Research questions and objectives 9
Methodology
Research Philosophy: Interpretivism 10
Research Strategy: Cross-Sectional Survey 10
Ethical Considerations 11
Results and Findings 11
Limitations 20
Conclusion and Recommendation 21
3
Running head: SAUDI USERS’ PRIVACY PERCEPTION
Introduction
WhatsApp is often used as a replacement of SMS messaging, it is a smart phone
application that allows users to send messages to other WhatsApp users. It is considered as the
most popular instant messaging application in the world and recently been in the news
concerning the privacy of its users after its purchase by Facebook. Facebook is one of the most
famous social media platforms which made the users data public in 2009. WhatsApp as well had
privacy issues of its own, like the poor encryption of messages, meaning using a packet
analyzing software, any “hacker” can view the content of the sent messages. Each and every
person has different views and perspectives regarding privacy in WhatsApp. Therefore, this
research was conducted to explore the awareness of WhatsApp users about the privacy issues
and how their awareness affects their behavior. The researchers have chosen this topic mainly
because no one have conducted the same research in Saudi Arabia. Moreover, a complete
analysis was done concerning the privacy of WhatsApp.
Literature Review
This section discusses the different secondary resources that the researchers used and
were exposed prior to conduct the research. The research’s questions, objectives, and design
were inspired and based on those readings. However, not everything that was read by the
researchers were matching the research. Such resources were criticized.
1. Internet Usage and Web-Applications in Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia is one of the fastest growing countries in terms of internet users, according
to Communication and Information Technology Commission (CITC) the usage of Internet in the
Kingdom increased in the last few years, from 13% in 2005 to 63.7% by the end of 2014 (ICT
report, 2014). Out of the 30,770,375 population (CDSI, 2014), 64.2% of the Kingdom’s
4
Running head: SAUDI USERS’ PRIVACY PERCEPTION
population are internet users, which account to more than half of the population (MCIT, 2014).
Saudi Arabia is ranked in the 35th place worldwide in terms of the Internet usage (CIA, 2014).
The high availability of internet services positively relates to the increased usage of web-based
applications and social media platforms represent huge share of the accessed web applications
facilitated by the use of mobile phones. In CITC Mobility in SA report, they confirmed that the
evolution of smart devices and its availability at lower prices nowadays in the Kingdom has
changed the way users interact with the internet and applications. Usage became highly personal,
not as it used to be limited to sharing with family or work. Mobility and instant access are factors
that provided so many opportunities to create and consume information (ICT report, 2014). In a
research conducted by Ipsos MediaCT, under Google commission, based on sample size n=500
of smartphones in Saudi Arabia, they found that 93% visit social networks and 74% visit at least
once a day (Our Mobile Planet, 2013).
2. Social Networking Trends
Social media trends have affected millions of users around the globe since the start of
first social networking site in 1997, they represent two thirds of the internet users (Boyd &
Ellison, 2008 as cited in O' Bien & Torres, 2012). One of the most famous social media platform
is Facebook, which alone, managed to reach 500 million users in 2010 (Wortham, 2010). As the
site became more popular, many privacy concerns were aroused by users. In 2009 they reached
climax because Facebook made all users data public by default (Rothery, 2010). On the other
hand, another famous social media platform is WhatsApp, which is an instant messaging
application similar to Facebook Messaging. (Geller, 2011) Since the first launch of the cross-
platform messaging application, WhatsApp has been used and liked by so many users and it
became a trend. The WhatsApp team reported that they handle over billion messages each day:
5
Running head: SAUDI USERS’ PRIVACY PERCEPTION
“The mobile messaging market is moving, choices around platforms and their pricing and
how they provide an amazing customer experience are the hot topics at hand. As a leader
in the messaging space and with the network now handling over one billion messages a
day, the researchers think that the power is with the consumer.”
(WhatsApp users now send over 1 billion messages each day, 2011). (Goretsky, 2014)
Recently, the major company Facebook, purchased WhatsApp for 19 billion dollars (Facebook
and WhatsApp: Security and privacy after the $19B deal). The researchers wonder if this step
will concern WhatsApp users as Facebook is known for its questionable privacy controls.
However, WhatsApp had as well privacy issues of its own, (Greenberg, 2014) like the poor
encryption of messages, meaning using a packet analyzing software, any “hacker” can view the
content of the send messages. Moreover, in 2013 the Canadian Privacy Commission found after
a study they did, that the app was collecting the numbers listed in the app user’s phone via
address books, even if they were not WhatsApp users. (WhatsApp Comes Under New Scrutiny
For Privacy Policy, Encryption Gaffs). (Abdullah, 2013) In 2013, CITC announced they will
block the social networking app WhatsApp if they do not comply with regulatory requirement of
telecommunication providers in SA. One of the requirement was to establish a local server so the
telecom operators can monitor user’s activities. (CITC: WhatsApp to be blocked before
Ramadan). WhatsApp complied with those requirement and the app was not blocked, however,
some services it provides is, like the free calling feature. Besides, CITC highlighted security
concerns as one of the major obstacles in the adaption of many ICT services in SA, especially in
remote access and internet based services, which are hosted and managed on the cloud (ICTC
report, 2014).
3. Privacy and users’ perception
6
Running head: SAUDI USERS’ PRIVACY PERCEPTION
The researchers identify users' privacy perception as how well they are aware of their rights
of data protection, and to which extent they have knowledge if their data is viewed or accessed or
modified or probably used by a third party (i.e. advertising companies), with or without their
permission. Users disclose various types of information using social networking, such as
personal names, photos, birth dates, and even possibly financial data. Many researchers viewed
sharing on social media as part of social exchange theory, which considers the long-term benefits
and costs of exchanging (French & Read, 2013). The benefits include sharing empathy,
strengthening relationships, and entertainment. (Krasnova et al. 2010, as cited in French & Read,
2013). Other researchers argued that users way of sharing information depends on the outcome
they want; outcomes based on relationships, romance, friendship, family or professionalism
differ for each user (French & Read, 2013). However, many users are unaware of possible
privacy violations risks; they share their lives publicly with others whom they share common
traits (French & Read, 2013). Researchers had evaluated privacy perception from the user’s
willingness to disclose information (Fogel and Nehma, 2009 as cited in French & Read, 2013)
and others as the ability to manage the security and privacy settings on SNSs (Debatin et al. 2009
as cited in French & Read, 2013). Many researchers confirmed that in web based virtual
communities, trust is viewed as a key factor for sharing data and information disclosure by users
(Fogel and Nehmad 2009, Hsuet al. 2011, Tsai and Cheng 2012 as cited in French & Read,
2013). As Facebook was the main trend of privacy issues, and had a broad media coverage,
many studies were conducted related to the site. One research examined Facebook users’
perception of online privacy. It aimed to find out if users’ awareness of privacy issues influences
their behavior; it believed there is a relationship between privacy and users’ trust of the site (O'
Bien & Torres, 2012). Their findings was that majority of users have not read the privacy policy
7
Running head: SAUDI USERS’ PRIVACY PERCEPTION
because of its length and boredom. The youngest age group (18–21) were the most active when it
came to information disclosure and frequency of use (O' Bien & Torres, 2012). While younger
users have more friends from the same age group, and they fully use the multimedia functions.
(As cited in Xie, Watkins, Golbeck, and Huang, 2012). They also believed it is more their
responsibility to protect their information on Facebook. (O' Bien & Torres, 2012). Furthermore, a
study conducted about how elders perceive social media, the initial perceptions were negative.
The participants linked social media with inappropriate teens’ behavior such as gossiping (Xie,
Watkins, Golbeck, and Huang, 2012). Older Facebook users are more likely to be cautious in
what they say and do on Facebook in comparison to younger Facebook users besides they are the
least trusting group on Facebook and they believe it is the Facebook company’s obligation to
protect users’ information (O' Bien & Torres, 2012). Some researchers had found a difference
between older and younger population’ perception towards technology, and others found that age
does not play a role (as cited in Xie et al, 2012). Regardless of the age group, majority of users’
main concern is their information being accessible by and sold to third party and the protection
of their personal information.
8
Running head: SAUDI USERS’ PRIVACY PERCEPTION
Research questions and objectives
After reviewing the literature, researchers decided to conduct similar research to (O’ Bien &
Torres, 2012) Social Networking and Online Privacy: Facebook Users' Perceptions, which
examined Facebook users’ perceptions of online privacy, and their awareness of privacy issues
and how their behavior is influenced by this awareness. Researchers will conduct the study about
Privacy and Social Networking: WhatsApp Users’ Perception in Saudi Arabia, by changing the
social networking platform to WhatsApp, and the location of the study to Saudi Arabia.
The following are the research’s questions and objectives which will be answered from primary
and secondary data collections in the results and findings.
1. How do WhatsApp’s users view privacy?
a. To understand users’ perception and views of privacy.
b. To identify if WhatsApp’s users trust them with their information.
c. To find out if users think companies have obligations to protect their data.
d. To find out if users are cautious of their data being accessed by third parties.
2. Does the awareness of WhatsApp privacy issues influences users’ behavior/sharing?
a. To identify the influence of privacy issues on users’ behavior.
b. To find out if the users read the privacy policy statements.
c. To measure how often do users change their privacy settings.
3. Is there is a relationship between WhatsApp and Facebook’s users’ privacy perceptions?
a. To identify if privacy issues are similar especially after the purchase of WhatsApp by
Facebook.
b. To identify if users’ view of privacy vary between the two social sites.
9
Running head: SAUDI USERS’ PRIVACY PERCEPTION
Methodology
Research Philosophy: Interpretivism
The researchers decided to use the interpretivism philosophy to provide analysis for a
mixture of qualitative and quantitative data that will be assessed. Saudi users’ awareness of
Social networks privacy is subjective of nature as users’ perceptions vary from each user to
another. The perceptions are affected by many variables such as cultural background, age,
education, and awareness. .The data collected was of quantitative nature and the sample size was
n=500. The researchers do not aim to generalize their findings on the Saudi population. Inductive
approach was used which follows the interpretivism philosophy because there was not a
developed theory to test a hypothesis, also the inductive approach is generally associated with
qualitative research.
Research Strategy: Cross-Sectional Survey
Survey strategy was used and conducted once, using non probability sampling technique
of snowball sampling. Using mono method questionnaires were conducted only, due to time
constraint. Also, it was the most appropriate for the nature of the data that the researchers wanted
to collect. Snowball sampling was implemented by using social networking applications (i.e.
WhatsApp and Facebook) to distribute the questionnaires in an online format, users were asked
to distribute it to their network of friends and friends of friends. This technique was used as it
was appropriate to use those sites as the researchers were be able to directly access the potential
targeted users of WhatsApp.
10
Running head: SAUDI USERS’ PRIVACY PERCEPTION
Ethical Considerations
The researchers will abide by all ethical considerations which include not using any false or
edited date, plagiarizing and the using information that could harm anyone in any possible way.
Due to the fact that many people dislike questionnaires and that they may feel the information
they will provide might be used inappropriately, the questionnaires to be distributed will ensure
anonymity for the participants and they are going to be approached professionally with no
pressure to answer if they would not like to. The researchers will distribute the same
questionnaire to all the participants and will not interfere in altering the results. The researchers
will comply with Saudi cultural values.
Results and Findings
This research had three main objectives, to understand users’ perception of privacy, to
identify the influence of privacy issues on users’ behavior, and to find out if WhatsApp and
Facebook users have similar privacy perceptions.
Demographics variables of gender and age groups were important in analyzing the
awareness level, perceptions, and behaviors. Researchers think due to the cultural values and
ethics in Saudi Arabia, gender plays an important role in perception and behavior part.
Researchers had the first impression before analyzing the results, that females in Saudi Arabia
might be a little conservative and more thoughtful and might tend to think before they send on
social media platforms compared to males. Out of the 500 respondents 69.5% of them were
females and 30.5% of them were males.
As for the age, the researchers included it as they wished to link their results to what they
found in the literature, some researchers (LR) got similar results for awareness between different
age groups, and for others (LR) age did not play a role in the results variation. Based on age
11
Running head: SAUDI USERS’ PRIVACY PERCEPTION
groups and out of the 500 responses, the highest rate was 47% for the ages of 16 to 25, followed
by 36% for the ages of 26 to 39, and the least rate was 17% for the ages 40 and plus. These
results matched the researchers’ expectations that they had before distributing the questionnaires
on WhatsApp. Researchers thought the highest response rate will be from the youngest age
groups, because from the researchers’ observations of the Saudi society, most of the younger
generation spend long times on social media. The lowest rate was from 40 and above because
either older people do not spend as much time on social media or the snowballing technique of
sending survey to network of friends did not reach enough mature users.
For the first main objective, a total of five questions were asked to help satisfy that
objective. First question was about participants’ most used functions on WhatsApp and what
type of information they share. As the researchers believed that each function is associated with a
certain level of information disclosure. (LR) some researchers suggested that privacy perception
is linked to the willingness of users to share information. Based on gender analysis, the results
for most used functions, ranging between texting, sending pictures, voice recordings, videos, and
location services, showed that texting was the highest for both genders, 36.1% for females, and
29.1% for males. Followed by sending pictures which both had very close results of 24% for
females and 24.3% for males. Researchers concluded from that, that usually users tend to be
more aware of what they share if they had to type it and it is not as easy as voice recordings
which was 13.5% for females and 14.5% for males. While both genders send pictures, the
following question was to identify if they are open with sharing personal photos and it showed a
variation between the two. While for other functions, location services results was 12.1% for
females and 14.7% for males. This low rate could indicate that a. not many users are aware of
12
Running head: SAUDI USERS’ PRIVACY PERCEPTION
this functions or b. they do not like the application to know their location and these is highly
linked to their awareness of privacy.
As for what type of information is being shared on WhatsApp, of personal information
category (personal photo, voice recording, video, location, and private information such as: bank
account details) for females the highest rate was 20.6% for work related information followed by
20% for personal photo, same rate of 16.8% for location and voice recording, and lowest rate
between all of 12.4 % for private information. While for male results of the personal information
category, the highest rate was 19.1% for personal photo followed by 18.5% for work related
information, and personal video and location came close of 16.4% and 16.8%, followed by
14.7% for private information and lowest rate between all was for personal voice recording of
14.5%. Comparing both highest rates of information type between males and females, males
were more open about sharing their personal photos than females, and researchers linked this
results to Saudi Arabia culture values where females tend to be more conservatives, thus having
higher awareness due to their values. While females had the highest rate of sharing work related
information and it was relatively lower for males, which the researchers concluded that males are
more aware of choosing what to share about their work details using social media and females do
not mind sharing work details with colleagues.
Based on age group analysis, the number one most used function between all age groups
was texting ranging from 32 to 34%, which was expected as it is the main function WhatsApp is
known for. Second most used functions with close results between all age groups as well ranging
between 23 to 25% was sending pictures. These two functions that the researchers considered it
having high level of information disclosure. Third place of most used function was voice
recordings for [16-25] and videos for [26-39] and [40+].
13
Running head: SAUDI USERS’ PRIVACY PERCEPTION
While for the last function, location services (GPS), which is in many countries, viewed
as a privacy threat as the application can track the user’s location if the service is enabled. For
Saudi users, from all age groups, the rate of the users who use location services ranged from 9 to
14 %. It seems that they do not consider it as a main function for WhatsApp, maybe they use
maps application instead, or they it could be they are cautious from it. In further results on the
bases of functions, 18.50% of the ages between 26 and 39 said they share their location, 16.2%
of the ages of 40 and plus, and 15.1% of the ages between 16 and 25.
[16-25] [26-39] 40 and above
15.10% 18.50% 16.20%11.90% 16.60% 11.60%20.30%
20.80%22.70%
14%16% 18%
19.10%16.20% 12.10%
20% 12% 20%
What type of information do you share on WhatsApp?
GPS Private info
personal photos Personal videos
Personal Voice recordings Work Related info
14
Running head: SAUDI USERS’ PRIVACY PERCEPTION
Males Female
16.90% 16.80%15.50% 12.30%
20.80% 20.90%
17.70% 13.50%
15.70% 17.70%
13.40% 18.80%
What type of information do you share on WhatsApp?
GPS Private informationpersonal photos Personal videosPersonal Voice recordings Work Related information
Next question under the first objective was, do you trust WhatsApp with keeping your
information private? In answering that question, based on gender analysis, the results did not
vary a lot from male to female. Majority said No, they do not trust WhatsApp, 61.9% for female,
and 66.9% for males. The others who said yes were 38.1% for females and 33.1% for males.
Based on age groups analysis, the results did not vary a lot as well for all age groups. Majority
said No, they do not trust WhatsApp, 61% for [16-25], 67% for [26-39], and 64% for 40 and
above. The others who said No were 39% for [16-25], 34% for [26-39], and 36% for 40 and
above. Since more than half said they do not trust WhatsApp of keeping their information
private, this indicates a high level of WhatsApp privacy issues awareness. As the results showed,
gender and age group differences did not affect the results of this question.
Next question under the first objective was, who do you think is responsible of protecting
your information privacy on WhatsApp? Based on gender analysis, the results did not vary a lot
from male to female. Who answered “Myself, because I choose what I share.” were 66.7% of
males and 63.1% of females. While who answered “WhatsApp, because I am using their
15
Running head: SAUDI USERS’ PRIVACY PERCEPTION
services” were 31% of males and 35.1% of females. This results could be interpreted in relation
with Saudi cultural values, as the individuals do not like sharing sensitive information with
“strangers”, so if they are online, they care not to share and their values recommend that they are
responsible about that. However, this results are negative in the sense that WhatsApp has many
issues with “its part” of protecting users’ data, for example, by using encryption for messages (),
and low rate [31% to 35.1%] said it’s the app responsibly, which the researchers expected more
users to say so. This question had “other” option to allow users’ other input. After analyzing all
what they wrote, many said in “other” that the responsibility is shared between both, the user and
the application representing 3.4 %. Other inputs gave useful insights and represented high level
of awareness, some user even added that “It should be a joint effort between users, service
provider and governments.”“ The service provider should also streamline the privacy protection
aspect of his service since many users are not well-versed in such practices.” However, it was
very low rate of less than 1%. Based on age groups analysis, the results did not vary between
each age group and came close. Who answered “Myself, because I choose what I share” were
62.1% for [16-25], 63.5% for [26-39], and 66.2% for 40 and above. While who answered
“WhatsApp, because I am using their services” were 34.1% for [16-25], 36.5% for [26-39], and
33.8% for 40 and above. The only variation between gender and age group analysis was that only
the ages from 16 to 25 chose the “other” option, including the previous results of whom said
“both” and from whom had useful input. Also, another 0.40% of age 16 to 25 answered in
“other” that they have no idea who is responsible.
Next question under the first objective was, do you think what you send on WhatsApp
might be used by another company (third party)? Researchers asked this question to find out if
users are cautious of their data being accessed by third parties because according to (O' Bien &
16
Running head: SAUDI USERS’ PRIVACY PERCEPTION
Torres, 2012) it was the main concern of the users in their study if the information is being
accessible by and sold to third parties. Based on gender analysis, 52.3% of males and 40% of
female said “yes”. While who answered “no” were 41.3% males and 53.5% females. “Other”
option was selected by 6.4% males and 6.5% females. Based on who said “yes” males were
higher by 12.3% indicating a higher cautiousness than females in the sample, the researchers are
not generalizing. And females who said “No” were higher by 12.2% than males. Who chose
“other” option, rates were very close. Based on age groups analysis, who answered “yes” were
46% for [16-25], 47% for [26-39], and 36% for 40 and above. While who answered “no” were
47% for [16-25], 49% for [26-39], and 54% for 40 and above. Last, who answered “other” were
7% for [16-25], 3% for [26-39], and 10% for 40 and above. The youngest age group [16-25]
results were very close between “yes” and “no” which is hard to identify whom from them is
more concerned, however, almost half said yes which indicate a decent level of awareness for
younger users. Their 7% “other” answers included majority of “I don’t know” followed by
“maybe”, which the researchers think that half of younger users who said “no” is because either,
a. they do not believe so, or b. they do not know about third party access concepts. Second age
group [26-39] also had a similar pattern of results of the youngest age group [16-25]. Results
were very close between “yes” and “no” which is hard to identify whom from them is more
concerned, however, who no were higher by only 2%. Their 3% “other” answers included
“maybe” followed by “I don’t know” and few said it is accessed by not a company, but by the
government, especially when needed, for security reasons. Last, the oldest age group [40+], had
a clearer distinguish between “yes” and “no” since majority answered “no”. The researchers
expected such results because many of WhatsApp users in Saudi Arabia from older age groups
could not be aware of third party access concepts, and how technology works in general. Of
17
Running head: SAUDI USERS’ PRIVACY PERCEPTION
course many variables affects that, like education for example, but the researchers did not
include that variable in this study.
For the second main objective, a total of three questions were asked to help satisfy that
objective. First question was, do you read the privacy policy statements provided by Social
Media sites? Based on gender analysis. Who answered “I never read it.” were 67.4% of males
and 65.9% of females. Who answered “I read it thoroughly” were 5.2% of males and 7.9% of
females. While who answered “I go through the first couple of pages” were 27.3% of males and
26.2% of females. Results were very close between both genders and it seems gender is not an
important variable in influencing behavior for this question. Based on age group analysis, who
answered “I never read it” were 68% for [16-25], 60% for [26-39], and 67% for 40 and above.
Who answered “I go through the first couple of pages” were 24% for [16-25], 31% for [26-39],
and 29% for 40 and above. While who answered “I read it thoroughly” were 8% for [16-25],
10% for [26-39], and 4% for 40 and above. The researchers expected the youngest age group to
have the highest rate of “I never read it” because the researchers observed that they do not like
reading much and probably will not be interested, and researchers got the highest rate from them
[68%]. However, they were lowest on “I go through the first couple of pages” [24%] which was
the indicator to medium level of awareness, and “I read it thoroughly” was the indicator of high
level and they got 8%. The second highest result of “I never read it” were for oldest age group,
who also scored low in “I read it thoroughly [4%] as the researchers expected. Researchers used
a follow up question to get some indications of why they do not read them, as researchers
expected it to be the highest result. The options were limited to most common reasons the
researchers found upon the literature review, including that privacy policies’ statements are
either “boring”, “too long”, or “I am not interested”, the researchers included as well “other’
18
Running head: SAUDI USERS’ PRIVACY PERCEPTION
option to see if other reasons exists for the respondents. Age group variable did not play a role in
results variations in the reasons, as researchers got very similar rates for all reasons. Almost half
of all age groups [51% to 53%] said because it is very long. [24.4% to 28.2%] said it was boring.
[16.80% to 21.1%] said they are interested. Companies defend themselves when privacy issues
arises by saying that they state everything in their privacy policy statements, and users should not
hold them reliable for those issues because they agreed to those statements. By making them
very long they almost guarantee that majority of the public, probably will not read them. Which
matched the results of one of the reasons. The “other” option helped to bring new insights into
users thinking, some of the responses was reflecting high level of awareness. Some said “even if
the app invade my privacy, they force me to accept statement to continue using the app” which is
interpreted as a negative sign. Other said they do not read it but instead they look up professional
bloggers summaries online of online privacy statements of different applications. Some of These
“other” answers reflected high awareness level, however, the rate of them was only ranged from
2% to 3.30%.
Next question under the second objective was a statement, “while on WhatsApp you’re:”
the options included “Worried about sharing your information”, “Not worried about sharing your
information”, and “other”. The majority of all age groups answered “Not worried about sharing
your information”, at a rate of 61.5% for [16-25], 58.2% for [26-39], and 57.1% for [40+]. While
who answered “Not worried about sharing your information”, were 37.6% for [16-25], 41.2% for
[26-39], and 42.9 for [40+]. Only ages of [16-25] and [26-39] chose “other” representing less
than 2%.
Next question under the second objective was, how often do you change your privacy
setting? The answers were limited by three options, “rarely”, “regularly” and “never”. The
19
Running head: SAUDI USERS’ PRIVACY PERCEPTION
researchers did this question based only on age groups analysis as researchers thought gender
was not important. The researchers expected the oldest age group to have the highest rate of
“never” as older users could be less involved in all application functions compared to younger
users. Who said “never” were 22.60% for [16-25], 15.4% for [26-39], and 26.20% for [40+].
Who said “rarely” were 59.8% for [16-25], 67.6% for [26-39], and 65.5% for [40+]. While who
answered “Regularly” were 18% for [16-25], 17% for [26-39], and 8.3% for [40+]. The age
group of [26-39] had the highest rate of “rarely” followed by the oldest age group.
Researchers linked this to the last objective which is “ To identify if users’ view of privacy vary
between the two social sites” and found out that those who are in the age group of [26-39] are
more concerned about the privacy issues of WhatsApp especially after its purchase by Facebook.
The fact that they were concerned about its privacy issues gave an indication that the way they
view different social sites differ. Moreover, this could also be linked to what was mentioned in
the LR, where researchers mentioned that Facebook made all users data public by default and
that many people were concerned. All in all, different people view the privacy of different sites
differently.
Limitations
Time was a major limitation while conducting this research, the time available to choose
a topic, choose an appropriate methodology and do the analysis were limited to the submission
date. In addition, the researchers had to manage their time and to be flexible so that they could
finish up their assignments and projects in the other courses that they enrolled in. The fluency in
English language was another limitation to in the research as they had to rewrite the survey
questions in Arabic so that they could get as more participants as possible. Analyzing the data
received took so much time and researchers were unsure of some of the results that they received
20
Running head: SAUDI USERS’ PRIVACY PERCEPTION
because it might have been bias as researchers did not observe the participants. The size,
convenience, and homogeneity of the sample limit the generalizability of this study. And lastly
the sample size chosen n=500, was small when considering generalization because the results
cannot be generalized to the entire population of Saudi Arabia.
Conclusion and Recommendation
This research was conducted in Saudi Arabia to test the awareness level of privacy towards the
WhatsApp users’ perception and to fill the gap of the subject. Moreover, the researchers did not
aim to generalize. It was found through the research that the sample were aware of the privacy
except for the oldest age group [40+] they were the least. For both gender mostly they do not
trust WhatsApp as it is their responsibility to protect themselves but still they were not aware of
a third party access. The research proved the privacy settings and statements are ignored and not
changed because of its length and there were not a satisfying reasons to do so. In addition, the
sample were concerned that their information can be accessed by Facebook referring to the fact
Facebook bought WhatsApp. Some of the results were expected to be, while some were not. The
level of awareness that was proven was not expected due to the lack of technological
backgrounds as they showed high percentages that it is their responsibility to protect what they
share. Most users did not trust WhatsApp it was expected that they know their information might
be shared by or was giving to another company for some purposes, the males were surer about it
as they had a higher percentage but most of the ones who wrote comments thought it is accessed
by the government only. This is considered as misunderstanding of privacy when it is accessed
by a third party.
After conducting this research, the researchers came up with some recommendations for future
researchers.
21
Running head: SAUDI USERS’ PRIVACY PERCEPTION
Recommendations for future research:
There has not been similar research on this topic in Saudi Arabia. The researchers suggest
by focusing on doing in depth research for each demographic variable alone. For example, each
age group and gender with adding other strategies (multi method) like observations. Increasing
the sample size is recommended, because it provides more reliable results. By still using the
survey strategy since it provides high level of feedback among different classes of people.
Another very famous social platform in Saudi Arabia is twitter, so this research could be
modified to accommodate Twitter’s users and functionalities. Other researchers can conduct
identical research to this one but using a different country and compare the awareness of users in
comparison to Saudi Arabia.
22