Upload
brian-smith
View
157
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Active Lift Control: Top Surface Air Injection
Erik Nelson
Brian Smith
Harrison Yates
Pressurized air through front
Angled to 30° from horizontal
Suction through back
Normal to surface
Tubes inserted into side
Airfoil Design
Wind Tunnel at 120 rpm 16 m/s
Determine angle of first separation
Approximately 20°
Control case, then with pressure
Lacked sufficient suction source
Flow Visualization
Control, α = 20°
Pressure, α = 20°
Video, α = 20°
Control, α = 30°
Pressure, α = 30°
Video, α = 30°
Control, α = 40°
Pressure, α = 40°
Video, α = 40°
Compare 0:00 to 0:42
Control, α = 45°
Pressure, α = 45°
Video, α = 45°
Red Tunnel at 500 rpm ≈ 17.5 m/s
Three experimental cases:
Control
5 psi
10 psi
Coefficients of Lift, Drag calculated
Force Balance
Experimental Setup
Experimental Setup
Lift Coefficients
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Lift Coefficients
Angle of Attack (Degrees)
cL
Control
5 psi
10 psi
Drag Coefficients
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Drag Coefficients
Angle of Attack (Degrees)
cD
Control
5 psi
10 psi
Lift / Drag Coefficient Ratios
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
Lift / Drag Ratios
Angle of Attack (Degrees)
cL / c
D
Control
5 psi
10 psi
Slight improvement in lift above α ≈ 25°
Only for 10 psi case
Improvement of drag above α ≈ 15°
5 psi good, 10 psi better
CL / CD ratio improved at high α – values
Most effective in near-stall situations
Force Balance Results
Questions?