Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Page 1 of 44
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Date 10/07/2015
The 226th
meeting of SEAC was held in Directorate of Environment, U.P. on
10/07/2015. Following members were present in the meeting along with Secretary,
SEAC:
1. Dr. M. S. Khan Chairman
2. Dr. S.N. Singh Member
3. Shri S.C. Bramhchari Member
4. Dr. D. C. Gupta, Member
5. Shri Lalji Rai Secretary
The Chairman welcomed the members to the 226th
SEAC meeting.
The minutes of 225th SEAC meeting dated 04/07/2015 were confirmed.
The Members of SEAC unanimously taken following decisions on the agenda
points discussed:
1. Group Housing Project at Khasra No-1109, 1110, Vill-Morta, Ghaziabad. Sri
Vijyant Jain, Director, C-10, Ramprastha, Ghaziabad. File No. 2492/SPO-V
The committee noted that consultant to the project could not present their
accreditation/credentials related to QCI/NABET. The proponent was also not ready with their
presentation. The committee directed to appear with complete documents and accreditations.
The committee also directed to submit all approved plans and the matter shall be deferred till
request from the project proponent in this regard.
2. Group Housing “Akansha Basera” No-5, Sector-K, Sushant Golf City, Hi Tech
Township Extension Area, Lucknow. Sri Vinod Tikku. File No. 2531/AD-Sub
The project proponent did not appear. The committee discussed and deliberated that
project fie should be closed and should be opened only after request from the project
proponent. The file shall not be treated as pending at SEIAA/SEAC.
3. Group Housing “Hamony Enclave” No-4, Sector-K, Sushant Golf City, Hi Tech
Township Extension Area, Lucknow. Sri Vinod Tikku, Ex. Director (Project) , File
No. 2532/SPO-V
The project proponent did not appear. The committee discussed and deliberated that
project fie should be closed and should be opened only after request from the project
proponent. The file shall not be treated as pending at SEIAA/SEAC.
4. Residential Project “Nikhil Park Royal” at Khasra No-210, Mauza Chamraui, Taj
Ganj Ward, Agra. Sri Shailendra Agrawal. File No. 2533/OSD-T
The project proponent did not appear. The committee discussed and deliberated that
project fie should be closed and should be opened only after request from the project
proponent. The file shall not be treated as pending at SEIAA/SEAC.
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 2 of 44
5. Group Housing Project “Aunipark” at Plot No-INS-02, CHI-V, Yamuna
Expressway, Greater Noida. Dri Dinesh Kumar, GM. File No. 2546/AD-Sub
The committee noted that an application dated 26/08/2014 was made by the project
proponent for environmental clearance of Group Housing Project “Aunipark” at Plot No-
INS-02, CHI-V, Yamuna Expressway, Greater Noida.
A presentation was made by Shri Mahendra Pandey as consultant and representative
of project proponent. Mr. Pandey informed the committee that the project proposal has been
revised and now the built up area as 1,58,088.596 sqm hence, the proposals are not covered
under category 8"b". The committee directed to submit complete revised proposals and to
defer the matter for next meeting for scoping. An affidavit shall also be submitted by the
proponent that no construction work has been yet started on the site.
6. 300 Beded combined hospital at Gata No.41/1,42 Tehsil-Sadar, District-Bareilly- File
No. 2564/DD-Y
The committee noted that an application dated 18/09/2014 was made by the project
proponent for environmental clearance of 300 Beded combined hospital at Gata No.41/1,42
Tehsil-Sadar, District-Bareilly.
A presentation was made by Dr. S.S. Sachan, Deputy CMO, Bareilly, project
proponent alongwith their consultant M/s Sawen Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd.
The project proponent informed that committee that 25% construction work has
already been undertaken. The committee discussed the matter and deliberated that Hon'ble
NGT in its order dated 07/07/2015 in the matter of S.P. Muthuraman V/s Union of India and
Ors. (Original Application No. 37 Of 2015 (M.A. No. 291, 293 & 294 Of 2015) and Original
Application No. 213 Of 2014 (Ma 755 Of 2014 & M.A. No. 177 Of 2015) has quashed the
MoEF OMs dated 12/12/2012 and 27/06/2013 related to provisions for dealing the violation
matters. In this situation the matter may be forwarded to SEIAA for taking necessary action
in view of Hon'ble NGT decision dated 07/07/2015.
7. Group Housing Project “Gangotri Enclave” at Plot No-8/GH-4, Sector-8, Avadh
Vihar Yojna (Sultanpur Road) Tehsil & Distt-Lucknow. Er. R B Yadav, Ex. Engg.,
CD-15, 2nd Floor, Sector-9, Vrindavan Yojna, Raebarelly Road, LKO. File No.
2731/DD-Y
The committee noted that the matter was earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated
01/06/2015 wherein the project proponent did not appear. The matter was again scheduled in
SEAC meeting dated 10/07/2015.
A presentation was made by Shri R.B. Yadav, Ex. Engineer, UP Awas Avam Vikas
Parishad alongwith their consultant M/s Sawen Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd. The
committee discussed the matter and directed the proponent to submit following information:
1. Area details showing proposed uses as residential, commercial, parks, parking, roads,
other services, facilities of the project also in percentage.
2. Maps/plans/services plans approved by Competent Authority.
3. Land allotment letter.
4. The structure design certificate by qualified structure engineer should be submitted.
The structural design certificate should preferably be vetted by IITs/CBRI. Provision
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 3 of 44
of alarm system, to timely notify the employees/residents, in case of occurrence of
earthquake/other natural disasters/fire should be provided.
5. All internal roads should be 09 m wide. Plan for right of way and carriage way and
section of road should be submitted.
6. Break-up of open area and landscape plan should be submitted.
7. Solid waste management and disposal plan with identification of authorized agency. .
8. Plan for 03 m peripheral green shall be provided along the boundary of the project.
9. Plan for Rain water harvesting.
10. Plan for plantation of minimum 300 trees should be submitted.
11. Provision of 100% solar lighting along the road site, stair cases, common places.
12. NOC from Fire Department and Airport Authority of India.
The matter shall be discussed after submission of information as above.
8. Group Housing Project “Bhagirathi Enclave” at Plot No-GH-1, Sector-2B, Avadh
Vihar Yojna (Sultanpur Road) Tehsil & Distt-Lucknow. Er. R L Yadav, Ex. Engg.,
UPAVP, Office Complex, Boothnath Mandir Marg, Indira Nagar, LKO. File No.
2732/AD -H
The committee noted that an application dated 24/12/2014 was made by the project
proponent for environmental clearance of Group Housing Project “Bhagirathi Enclave” at
Plot No-GH-1, Sector-2B, Avadh Vihar Yojna (Sultanpur Road) Tehsil & Distt-Lucknow.
A presentation was made by Er. R.L. Yadav, UP Awas Avam Vikas Parishad
alongwith their consultant M/s E.C. Engineers, Jaipur. The committee discussed the matter
and directed the proponent to submit following information:
1. Area details showing proposed uses as residential, commercial, parks, parking, roads,
other services, facilities of the project also in percentage.
2. Maps/plans/services plans approved by Competent Authority.
3. Land allotment letter.
4. The structure design certificate by qualified structure engineer should be submitted.
The structural design certificate should preferably be vetted by IITs/CBRI. Provision
of alarm system, to timely notify the employees/residents, in case of occurrence of
earthquake/other natural disasters/fire should be provided.
5. All internal roads should be 09 m wide. Plan for right of way and carriage way and
section of road should be submitted.
6. Break-up of open area and landscape plan should be submitted.
7. Solid waste management and disposal plan with identification of authorized agency. .
8. Plan for 03 m peripheral green shall be provided along the boundary of the project.
9. Plan for Rain water harvesting.
10. Plan for plantation of minimum 300 trees should be submitted.
11. Provision of 100% solar lighting along the road site, stair cases, common places.
12. NOC from Fire Department and Airport Authority of India.
The committee also observed that there were several calculation mistakes in the
presentations. The quality of presentations was very poor. The consultant may be directed to
submit the profile of the company along with details of the work experience in the field of the
construction projects and should also submit the names of the coordinator/field area experts
etc.
The matter shall be discussed after submission of information as above.
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 4 of 44
9. Group Housing Project “Mandakini Enclave” at Khasra no. 183, 189, 190, 193, 184,
185, 186, 187, 188, 191, 192, 194, 195 & 196 Avadh Vihar Yojna (Sultanpur Road)
Lucknow. Er. Ramesh Mishra, Ex. Engg., Div-21, UPAVP, LKO. File No.
2733/SPO-V
The committee noted that an application dated 20/12/2014 was made by the project
proponent for environmental clearance of Group Housing Project “Mandakini Enclave” at
Khasra no. 183, 189, 190, 193, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 191, 192, 194, 195 & 196 Avadh
Vihar Yojna (Sultanpur Road) Lucknow.
A presentation was made by Shri Ramesh Mishra, Executive Engineer, UP Awas
Avam Vikas Parishad alongwith their consultant M/s E.C. Engineers, Jaipur. The committee
discussed the matter and directed the proponent to submit following information:
1. Area details showing proposed uses as residential, commercial, parks, parking, roads,
other services, facilities of the project also in percentage.
2. Maps/plans/services plans approved by Competent Authority.
3. Land allotment letter.
4. The structure design certificate by qualified structure engineer should be submitted.
The structural design certificate should preferably be vetted by IITs/CBRI. Provision
of alarm system, to timely notify the employees/residents, in case of occurrence of
earthquake/other natural disasters/fire should be provided.
5. All internal roads should be 09 m wide. Plan for right of way and carriage way and
section of road should be submitted.
6. Break-up of open area and landscape plan should be submitted.
7. Solid waste management and disposal plan with identification of authorized agency. .
8. Plan for 03 m peripheral green shall be provided along the boundary of the project.
9. Plan for Rain water harvesting.
10. Plan for plantation of minimum 300 trees should be submitted.
11. Provision of 100% solar lighting along the road site, stair cases, common places.
12. NOC from Fire Department and Airport Authority of India.
The committee also observed that there were several calculation mistakes in the
presentations. The quality of presentations was very poor. The consultant may be directed to
submit the profile of the company along with details of the work experience in the field of the
construction projects and should also submit the names of the coordinator/field area experts
etc.
The matter shall be discussed after submission of information as above.
10. Group Housing Project “Alaknanda Enclave” at Plot No-G-2 & G-3, Khasra No.
217, 228-233, 243-254, 256, 259-266, Avadh Vihar Yojna (Sultanpur Road) -
Lucknow. Er. Ramesh Mishra, Ex. Engg. File No. 2734/OSD-T
The committee noted that an application dated 24/12/2014 was made by the project
proponent for environmental clearance of Group Housing Project “Alaknanda Enclave” at
Plot No-G-2 & G-3, Khasra No. 217, 228-233, 243-254, 256, 259-266, Avadh Vihar Yojna
(Sultanpur Road) -Lucknow.
A presentation was made by Shri Anil Kumar Mishra, Executive Engineer, UP Awas
Avam Vikas Parishad alongwith their consultant M/s E.C. Engineers, Jaipur. The committee
discussed the matter and directed the proponent to submit following information:
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 5 of 44
1. Area details showing proposed uses as residential, commercial, parks, parking, roads,
other services, facilities of the project also in percentage.
2. Maps/plans/services plans approved by Competent Authority.
3. Land allotment letter.
4. The structure design certificate by qualified structure engineer should be submitted.
The structural design certificate should preferably be vetted by IITs/CBRI. Provision
of alarm system, to timely notify the employees/residents, in case of occurrence of
earthquake/other natural disasters/fire should be provided.
5. All internal roads should be 09 m wide. Plan for right of way and carriage way and
section of road should be submitted.
6. Break-up of open area and landscape plan should be submitted.
7. Solid waste management and disposal plan with identification of authorized agency. .
8. Plan for 03 m peripheral green shall be provided along the boundary of the project.
9. Plan for Rain water harvesting.
10. Plan for plantation of minimum 300 trees should be submitted.
11. Provision of 100% solar lighting along the road site, stair cases, common places.
12. NOC from Fire Department and Airport Authority of India.
The committee also observed that there were several calculation mistakes in the
presentations. The quality of presentations was very poor. The consultant may be directed to
submit the profile of the company along with details of the work experience in the field of the
construction projects and should also submit the names of the coordinator/field area experts
etc.
The matter shall be discussed after submission of information as above.
11. Bhaunrat Dam Irrigation Project having CCA 9850 Ha in Mahrouni, Lalitpur. Sri
K.K. Agrawal, Ex.Engg, Irrigation Construction Div-II, Lalitpur. File No.
2641/OSD-T
The committee noted that an application dated 04/11/2014 was made by the project
proponent for environmental clearance of Bhaunrat Dam project, Tehsil-Mehrouni, District-
Lalitpur. Gross Command area for irrigation is 13450 ha & culturable command area is 9850
ha (Existing command 7995 ha and new command 1855 ha). Terms of reference were issued
through letter dated 02/12/2014. Public hearing was undertaken on 25/04/2015 in village-
Bhaunrat, Tehsil-Mehrauni, District-Lalitpur, U.P. under Chairmanship of Shri ADM,
Lalitpur. Final EIA was submitted through letter dated 21/05/2015.
A presentation was made by the project proponent and along with their consultant M/s
CEMC Pvt. Ltd. The proponent, through the documents submitted and the presentation made,
informed the committee that:-
1. The environmental clearance is sought for Bhaunrat Dam project, Tehsil-Mehrouni,
District-Lalitpur. Gross Command area for irrigation is 13450 ha & culturable
command area is 9850 ha (Existing command 7995 ha and new command 1855 ha).
2. Project details of the project is as follows:
Project name Bhaunrat Dam Project, Tehsil Mehrouni,
District Lalitpur, Uttar Pradesh
Location of Dam Village- Bhaira, Tehsil- Mehrauni, Dist-
Lalitpur, Uttar Pradesh
Latitude 24
0
35’10” N
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 6 of 44
Longitude 78
0
40’00” E
Source Supply Jamni River (Betwa Basin)
Net Catchment Area (U.P.) for Bhaunrat Dam 335.40 Sq. Km
Irrigation- Gross Command Area (Ha.)- 13450 Ha
Culturable Command Area (Ha)-
Water Required for Drinking
Water Required for Irrigation
9850 Ha (Existing 7955 Ha & new 1855 Ha.)
1.00 M.C.M.
34.90 M.C.M.
(24.10 M.C.M. in Rabi & 10.80 M.C.M. In
Kharif)
Type of Dam
Ht. of Dam – Above River Bed (Max.)
Gross Storage
Live storage
Dead Storage Length of Dam
Evaporation/Absorption Losses
Useful Storage
Levels Elevations –
River Bed Level (Average)
Dead Storage Level
FRL/FSL
Highest Flood Level
Top Level of Dam
Earthen Dam
19.93 m
45.08 M.C.M.
40.55 M.C.M.
4.53 M.C.M. 4.20 K.m.
4.65 M.C.M.
35.90 M.C.M.
344.00 M.
354.55 M.
360.90 M.
361.40 M.
363.10 M.
Spillway – Type
Clear water way/Length
No./Type/Size of Gate
Energy Dissipation Device Type
Ogee Shaped
130m/157m
13 No. vertical lift gate (10mx6.5m)
Stilling Basin with chute blocks
Abadi Submerged – No. of Village
No. of Building
No. of Families Affected
06 (Satlinga, Bhaunrat, Chhaprat, Kisarda,
Mudia and Vedpur)
78 Pucca/347 Kachcha
311
Submerged Area at Full Reservoir Level 1260 Ha.
Land to Be acquired –
Submergence
Head works
Canal
Total -
1094.00 Ha.
55.48 Ha.
117.30 Ha.
1266.78 Ha. Out of which 201 Ha forest land
Total Cost of Project 44003.77 Lac
Benefits – Additional yield 344100 Qtl. (Food-Grain)
Benefit – Cost Ratio 1.61
Cost of Irrigation/Ha. 2.44 Lac/Ha.
Topo sheet number 54L/15
Man power 200
Nearest railway station Lalitpur Railway Station, 40.00 km
Nearest Road/national highway Mahrauni
Nearest air port Gwalior Airport, approx. 240 km.
Seismic zone Zone-V (As per 1893:2002)
3. Bhaunrat Dam Project is proposed for providing irrigation facility for an area of 9850
Ha.
4. The TOR was approved on 15-11-2014 vide letter no. Parya/SEAC/2641/2014
/OSD(T).
5. The baseline environmental studies have been conducted during November 2014 to
February 2015 as per the approved TOR and Draft EIA was submitted to U.P.
Pollution Control Board for conducting Public Hearing.
6. The Public Hearing was conducted on 25-04-2015 in village-Bhaunrat, Tehsil-
Mehrauni, District-Lalitpur, U.P.
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 7 of 44
7. The Final EIA after incorporating public hearing minutes and action plan has been
submitted for environmental clearance to SEIAA.
8. Jamni Dam Irrigation project already exists on Jamni River which is approximately 20
km upstream of the proposed dam. However, the catchment area of 335 Sq. Km is
untapped which will act as catchment by the proposed project.
9. The District Agriculture Officer has assessed that the project on completion will cater
to an area of 9000 ha during Khariff and 7700 ha in Rabi.
10. Land requirements for the project are 1266.78 out of which 201 Ha is forest land. The
villages Satlinga, Bhaunarat, chaprat, Kisarda, Mudia, Vedpur are impacted due to
submergence.
11. 311 families, 78 Pucca and 347 Kachcha houses will be affected and to be
rehabilitated. Appropriate compensation packages according to the R & R policy,
2007 will be provided to those families who are identified by the committee formed
by govt. for R & R work of this project.
12. The total project cost is Rs. 44003.77 Lakh & a total budget of Rs. 1565.37 Lacs +
6.03 ha land for resettlement purposes would be required for the Resettlement and
Rehabilitation Plan.
13. Total project cost is Rs. 440.Crores and CSR expenditure will be in the form of
providing employment for 100 persons. The drinking water and health Check-up to be
provided. CSR will be 3.557% for social benefits and other services.
14. Forest land is in the active stage of acquisition. The report for this has been prepared
and being investigated by the Forest Department.
15. The project proposals are covered under category 1"c" of EIA notification, 2006, as
amended.
The committee discussed the matter and observed that following provisions have been
prescribed in OM No. J-11013/41/2006-IA.II(I) dated 09/09/2011 of MoEF, Govt. of India
regarding "Consideration of projects for grant of environment clearance under EIA
Notification, 2006, which involve forestland - Procedure to be followed-further
clarifications":
"At the stage of consideration of proposals for EC in respect of projects involving
forestland, the project proponent would inform the respective EACs about the status of
their application for forestry clearance along with necessary supporting documents from the
concerned Forest Authorities. It will clearly be informed to the EAC whether the application
is at the State level or at the Central level. The EAC will take cognizance of the involvement
of forestland and its status in terms of forestry clearance and make their recommendations
on the project on its merits. After the EAC has recommended the project for environmental
clearance, it would be processed on file for obtaining decision of the Competent Authority
for grant of environmental clearance. In the cases where the Competent Authority has
approved the grant of environmental clearance, the proponent will be informed of the same
and a time limit of 12 months, which may be extended in exceptional circumstances to 18
months, a decision on which will be taken by the Competent Authority, will be given to the
proponent to submit the requisite stage-I forestry clearance. The formal environmental
clearance will be issued only after the stage-I forestry clearance has been submitted by the
proponent.
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 8 of 44
In the eventuality that the stage-I forestry clearance is not submitted by the
proponent within the prescribed time limit mentioned at para (ii) above, the proposal for
environmental clearance will stand rejected and the entire process of obtaining
environmental clearance will have to be initiated de-novo as per the procedure prescribed
under EIA Notification, 2006."
In view of above, the committee directed that compliance to above provisions of OM
dated 09/09/2011 should be submitted in terms of status of their application for forestry
clearance along with necessary supporting documents from the concerned Forest Authorities
prior to further consideration of project. The committee also directed to submit 24 year
records of flood data of the River and excavated Soil management and uses.
The matter may be scheduled immediately after submission of information/documents
as above.
12. Trade Facilitation Centre & Crafts Museum at Bada Lalpur, Varanasi, U.P. Si
Manoj Jain, Director, Office of Development Commission (Handloom) File No.
3190/AD-Sub The committee noted that an application dated 16/06/2015was made by the project
proponent for environmental clearance of Trade Facilitation Centre & Crafts Museum at
Bada Lalpur, Varanasi, U.P.
A presentation was made by Shri S.Srinivas, NHDC Ltd., project proponent
alongwith their consultant M/s Grass Roots Research & Creation India (P) Ltd. The
committee discussed the matter and directed the project proponent to submit following
information:
1. Physical features within 30 m of the project site with their ownership. 2. Copy of layout plan/maps/services plans as approved by Development Authority.
3. List of proposed activities area wise. 4. Proposed fixed and floating population of the project.
5. Proposal regarding source of water for meeting the water requirement of the project. If ground water is proposed to be used, permission from ground water department should
be taken. Underground water tank for storage of storm water may be provided.
6. Dimensions of ramps and passages proposed for the project.
7. Pathways to connect the building should be explicitly shown on layout.
8. Proposal for rain water harvesting only from the rooftop. Plan for water body with
Kachha base should be submitted for storm water utilization for water recharge.
9. The structure design certificate by qualified structure engineer should be submitted. The
structural design certificate should be vetted by IITs/CBRI. Provision of alarm system,
to timely notify the employees/residents/visitors in case of occurrence of
earthquake/other natural disasters/fire should be provided.
10. Fire NOC to be submitted.
11. 36 nos. of trees are proposed to be cut. Prior permission from Forest Department should be taken alongwith compensatory plantation.
12. Identify authorized agency for Municipal solid waste management and disposal as per law. Submit plan. Location of landfill site to be provided.
13. Plan for provision of 100% solar energy on roads/streets and common places should be submitted.
14. Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary provision amounting to 2% of project cost shall be prepared and approved by Board of Directors
of the company. A copy of resolution as above shall be submitted to the authority alongwith list of beneficiaries with their mobile nos./address.
The matter shall be discussed after submission of information as above.
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 9 of 44
13. Commercial Project “Sparsh” at Plot No-GH-02D, Sector-12, Greater Noida, U.P.
Sri Mradul Srivastava, B-11, Sector-1, Noida, U.P. File No. 2341/AD-H
The committee noted that the matter was earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated
31/01/2015 and 21/02/2015 wherein the project proponent was directed to submit
information. The project proponent submitted information through undated letter received on
28/04/2015. However, Dr. D.C. Gupta, Member, SEAC informed that he has not received the
copies of replies yet. Therefore, the committee directed to defer the matter for next meeting and directed the project proponent to ensure delivery of replies.
14. Group Housing “Ashwaryam” at Sector-16C Noida Extension (Gaur City-2)U.P.
Sri R.K.Gupta, Director, Unit No-9, Krishna Apra Sapphire Plaza, Indirapuram,
Ghaziabad. File No. 2342/DD-D
The committee noted that the matter was earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated
17/03/2015 wherein the project proponent was directed to submit information. The project proponent submitted information through undated letter received on 28/04/2015. However,
Dr. D.C. Gupta, Member, SEAC informed that he has not received the copies of replies yet.
Therefore, the committee directed to defer the matter for next meeting and directed the
project proponent to ensure delivery of replies.
15. Group Housing Project “RG Luxury Homes” at Plot No-GH-07A, Sector-16B,
Greater Noida Sri B K Agrawal, Sr. VP (Operation) File No. 2540/AD-H
The committee noted that terms of reference in the matter were prescribed in SEAC
meting dated 22/03/2015 and EIA have been submitted through letter dated 15/06/2015. The
EIA report was also not submitted to all the members as informed during the meeting,
therefore the presentation could not be made. The committee discussed and directed to schedule the matter as per chronology of 8"b" Category projects.
16. Theme Park, Agra, U.P., Developed by UPSIDC. Sri M L Sonkar, Ex. Engg (HQ),
UPSIDC Ltd., A-1/4, Lakhanpur, Kanpur. File No. 2576/AD(Sub)
The committee noted that the matter was earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated
25/05/2015 wherein the project proponent was directed to submit following information:
1. NOC from Taj Trapezium Zone Authority regarding the project proposals. 2. NOC from Central and State Departments of Archaeology.
3. Height of the land from mean Sea level and from maximum flood level.
4. No objection from Irrigation Department.
5. Study should be conducted regarding maximum flood level of 100 years.
6. What are the permissible uses of the site as per Agra Master Plan.
7. Plan for use of Solar Energy. Maximum solar energy uses should be explored.
8. Area details showing proposed uses as residential, commercial, parks, parking, roads,
other services, facilities of the project also in percentage.
9. Phase wise project details and proposed activities.
10. What is the total cost of the project and its detail of different phases. Specially Ist
phase details of project to be implemented with cost and recovery system.
11. What will be the Socio Economic impact on Agra town.
12. What is the distance from Taj Mahal of the proposed site. Whether the view of Taj
will be affected. A complete report with necessary supporting documents should be submitted.
13. Permission to be obtained from Central Ground Water Board for drilling of tube well and for making of water works.
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 10 of 44
14. Minimum 2% provision is to be made under CSR. The detail with of CSR to be
provided with total cost and scheme to be executed in various phases during the
implementation of project. The list of beneficiaries along with project photographs is
to be submitted.
The committee also observed that the project proponent/EIA Consultant has not fully
complied the TOR POINTS like approval of the lay-out plan, conversion of land use from
agricultural to non agricultural, approvals of entire built up areas, obtaining NOC from NRCD, Irrigation Deptt. central water commission, Archaeological Survey of India etc. The
proposed land area is also not fully transferred and some part of it is under Stay of Hon' High court, Allahabad. The proponent has also not provided the details of the proposed built up
area block wise or building wise. The project proponent has not submitted the DPR actually prepared by the project proponents. The EIA report is not well documents and lacks in the
following:
• The Impact Analysis on the River Yamuna, The study of highest flood level/point and
the calculation of the safity distances, Impact on the seasional floods of Yamuna,alternative sources of water like putting water works instead of ground water
utilisation, Thinking of conducting a bandha along the river.
• There are approx. 400 big trees, many old water wells and the hand pumps etc in the
proposed land but nothing has been discussed in this regard. The same should be
covered under EIA.
• Disposal of domestic waste, domestic solid wastes are tentatively discussed and their
final disposal is also not environmentally safe. A comprehensive plan in this regard
should be prepared and submitted.
The project proponent submitted their replies through letter dated 29/06/2015. A
presentation was made by Shri Ashok Kumar Verma, representative of project proponent alongwith their consultant M/s Perfact Enviro Solutions Pvt. Ltd. The committee discussed
the matter and directed the project proponent to submit following information: 1. Regarding replies submitted against query no. 1, the committee noted that minutes of
meeting dated 07/01/2015 of TTZ Authority as submitted by project proponent states that the matter shall be discussed in next meeting of TTZ Authority after obtaining
EIA report. Since, EIA report in the matter has been prepared by the project
proponent, the same should be submitted to TTZ Authority for
consideration/clearance. Clearance from TTZ Authority should be submitted as also
pointed out by Archaeological Survey of India.
2. Regarding replies submitted against query no. 2, the committee noted that the project
proponent has submitted letter dated 13/01/2015 from Archaeological Survey of India
that proposed theme park is outside of the regulated area of central protected
monument of Archaeological Survey of India. But, since this project falls under TTZ
area, clearance from TTZ Authority is necessary. The SEAC observed that since the
clearance from TTZ Authority is very basic prerequisite of siting of this project,
which is also clear from letter dated 13/01/2015 of Archaeological Survey of India,
the project proponent should submit EIA report to Authority for
consideration/clearance from TTZ Authority. 3. Regarding replies submitted against query no. 4, the project proponent has submitted
copy of letter dated 03/01/2015 of Executive Engineer, Irrigation Khand, Hathras, wherein conditional NOC has been provided. However, it is also mentioned in the
letter dared 03/01/2015 that NOC from Lower Khand, Agra Canal, Agra and Irrigation Nirman Khand, Mathura shall also be obtained by the project proponent.
The committee directed that NOCs from all required agencies as mentioned in letter
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 11 of 44
dated 03/01/2015 of Executive Engineer, Irrigation Khand, Hathras should also be
submitted for consideration.
4. Regarding replies submitted against query no. 5, the project proponent submitted
abstract of annual flood report from Irrigation Department with submission that
maximum flood level of Yamuna River in past 100 year was found to be 154.760 in
1987. The committee observed that document dated 20/08/2014 which provides
"nSfud unh ty Lrj ,oa ck<+ dh lwpuk ¼lwpuk dk lzksr&dsUnzh; ty vk;ksx] y[kuŽ" however, in this documents it is not mentioned that it relates to information for last
100 years. Also, in Colum no. 5 of this information dated 20/08/2014 highest flood
level of Agra is 154.760 m for year 1978 however, the project proponent in his
presentation has mentioned it as year 1987. This mismatch should be clarified
alongwith documents which mentions that the submitted data relates to highest flood
levels for last 100 years. The committee also directed to submit horizontal expansion of flood within last 100 years. The proponent also informed that embankment shall be
constructed along the project boundary towards River Yamuna. The committee directed to submit NOC from related Department. The committee also directed to
submit study regarding the impact of construction of embankment on the other side of River Yamuna. A study of 100 years Flood level in future to be submitted to protect
and plan accordingly. 5. Regarding replies submitted against query no.6, the project proponent submitted that
as per Agra Master Plan, 2021 the land use for the land in question is "Agriculture". Part of the land was acquired by Agra Development Authority for "Planned
Development for 100 M Wide Road from NH-2 to NH-3 and land parcel" and the
balance was acquired by UPSIDC for "Development of Theme Park". The proponent
also informed that Agra Development Authority has informed through letter dated
03/06/2015 that Theme Park/Amusement Park is permitted to be established in the
land in question pursuant to G.O. No. 3150/41-2013-37YO/2012, dated 06/11/2013.
The SEAC noted that letter dated 03/06/2015 of Secretary, ADA states that proposal
for amendment in zoning regulation for establishment of Theme Park/Amusement
park in "Agriculture Land use" of Master Plan has been sent by authority to Govt. The
SEAC directed to submit Zoning regulation/Master Plan as approved by State Govt.
in continuation to letter dated 03/06/2015 of Secretary, ADA. Copy of Govt. Order
regarding 25% use of land for other activities is to be submitted. 6. Regarding replies submitted against query no.8, Activity wise land uses have been
submitted. The committee directed to submit approved plan/layout of the project by competent authority. The project proponent informed that the ADA has no jurisdiction
over the proposed site for approval. The committee directed to submit communication between project proponent and ADA where it has been communicated that ADA has
no jurisdiction over the proposed site for approval. Also, approved activity wise land uses from UPSIDC should be submitted as project proponent submitted that the
project is under jurisdiction of UPSIDC. 7. Regarding replies submitted against query no.9, the project proponent submitted that
first phase is to be completed in first four years from the date of commencements the
committee directed to submit complete development details of first phase alongwith
area chart. Phase wise list of activities alongwith corresponding area calculation
charts should be clearly mentioned and submitted for which environmental clearance
is sought. Plan for services, roads, parking, solid waste management, green/plantation,
structural safety, water management, sewage should also be provided accordingly.
8. Regarding replies submitted against query no.12, arial distance to Taj Mahal from
proposed site is 6.20 KM SW whereas distances via road is approximately 17.2 KM.
The project proponent also submitted calculation to establish that Taj Mahal from the
proposed site of Theme Park can not be visualise. So the view of Taj Mahal will not
affected by this proposed project Theme Park in Agra.
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 12 of 44
9. Regarding replies submitted against additional queries, the project proponent
submitted an undertaking dated 29/06/2015 by Shri Suresh Kumar, Regional
Manager, UPSIDC Ltd., Agra that UP State Industrial Development Authority is
authorized to approve layout plan of area falling under UPSIDA jurisdiction
accordingly the layout plan of the project shall be approved by the competent
authority of UPSIDA before actual execution of the proposed project. The committee
discussed the matter and directed to submit approved plans to be considered by
committee. The proponent has also not provided the details of the proposed built up area block wise/building wise/activity wise which should be submitted for
consideration. Application should also be submitted to NRCD for NOC and its copy should be submitted to SEAC.
10. The project proponent also submitted that only 26 acre land is under stay from Hon'ble High Court. Efforts are being made to settle the dispute through negotiation
before commencements of the project. The committee directed to submit specific plans on this proposed 26 acres land which is under stay from Hon'ble High Court.
11. Regarding study on impact analysis on the River Yamuna, project proponent submitted that a study shall be conducted by the consultant and shall be submitted.
Project proponent also submitted that tress and old water structure shall be retained to
the maximum extent possible.
The committed directed to submit information regarding above issues
alongwith approved DPR regarding the project. The matter shall be discussed after
submission of information as above.
17. Leather Technology at B-12, Leather Technology Park, UPSIDC, Banthar, Unnao,
U.P. Sri Farhan Ajmal, M/s Calico. File No. 2575/AD-H
The project proponent did not appear. The committee discussed and deliberated that
project fie should be closed and should be opened only after request from the project proponent. The file shall not be treated as pending at SEIAA/SEAC.
18. Tank Constructed after the year 2006, Bharat Petroleum Corp. Ltd., Mathura. T.
M. (Retail), Bharat Petrolium Corp. Ltd., Plot No-D-1, Rd No-26, UPSIDC Area,
Site-B, Mathura File No. 2624/DD-Y
The project proponent did not appear. The committee discussed and deliberated that
project fie should be closed and should be opened only after request from the project
proponent. The file shall not be treated as pending at SEIAA/SEAC.
19. Expansion of Existing Unit at Plot No-A-10, by incorporation Plot No-A-11 at
Lether Technology Park, Banthar, Unnao.- Sri Kamal Ahmad, Oxford Tanners,
File No. 2839/DD-Sh.
The project proponent did not appear. The committee discussed and deliberated that
project fie should be closed and should be opened only after request from the project proponent. The file shall not be treated as pending at SEIAA/SEAC.
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 13 of 44
20. Leather Technology Park at A-44, UPSIDC, Banthar, Unnao, U.P. M/s Naaz
Leather Finishers, Sri Javed Iqbal, A-44, Lether Tech. Park, Banthar, Unnao. File
No. 2847/SPO-V
The committee noted that an application dated 18/02/2014 received on 21/02/2015
was made by the project proponent for environmental clearance of Leather Technology Park
at A-44, UPSIDC, Banthar, Unnao, M/s Naaz Leather Finishers.
A presentation was made by Shri Rees Iqbal, Partner, authorized representative of
project proponent alongwith their consultant M/s Green Enviro Engineers Pvt. Ltd. The
proponent, through the documents submitted and the presentation made, informed the
committee that:-
1. The environmental clearance is sought for Tannery Unit M/s Naaz Leather Finishers at
A-44, UPSIDC, Leather Technology Park, Banthar, Unnao.
2. Environmental clearance for Leather Technology Park, Banthar has already been issued
by MoEF with specific condition that individual tanneries under this park shall also
seek environmental clearance.
3. Salient features of project are as follows:
Name of project Leather Processing Unit
Location at A-44, UPSIDC, Leather Technology park, Banther, Unnao , U.P
Coordinates of proposed site is
Latitude
Longitude
26°33‘45"N
80°32‘24"E
Toposheet SOI map bearing survey no. . at A-44, UPSIDC,
Leather Technology park, Banther, Unnao , U.P
Elevation 120 m amsl
Soil Alluvial deposits of quaternary sediments
Gradient 1x10
3
(1m per km)
Land Use of proposed project Industrial area, UPSIDC, Unnao
Products Raw leather to Finished Leather
Land area 5034 sqm (1.24 Acre)
Size/ Capacity of project 180 Hides/day (3600 kg)
Raw Material Hides / Skin
Source of water Ground water
Waste water generation 110 KLD
ETP Capacity Primary treatment plant 120 KLD
Landscape area 1717 (33%)
No. of trees proposed 35
4. Details of raw materials/chemicals:
Sr. No. Name of Raw Material Daily Capacity
01 Raw Hide 3600 KG
02 Sodium Format 45 kg/day
03 BCS 220 kg/day
04 Synthetic Tanning Agents 180 kg/day
06 . Fat Liquors 220 kg/day
07 Dyes 45 kgs/day
08 Binders 65 kgs/day
09 Pigments 5 kg/day
10 Top coats 75 kg/day
11 Wax Emulsions 10 kg/day
12 Feel Modifiers 2/3 kg/day
5. Water balance diagram is as follows:
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 14 of 44
6. Approximately, 120 cum/day ground water is proposed to be used for the project, out of
which 05 cum/day for boiler feed, 110 cum/day for industrial process, 1-2 cum/day domestic uses and 5-10 cum/day for green belt development is proposed.
7. Tannery unit is a member of Banthar Industrial Pollution Control Company and there are no dues are pending.
8. Solid waste generation details and disposal plan is as follows: S.N. Type of Waste Quantity Generation
(MT/Month)
Utilization / Disposal Plan
1. Coal Ash (Generated through
Boiler)
5 - 10 Utilization for as per fly ash rule.
2. ETP sludge 3- 5 Dispose through TSDF site Establish in
side premises or (UP waste management
Project) registration completed.
3. Used Oil
(Generated through stand by DG
set)
50 liter/Month Partial used in Boiler and partial sell to
register recycler.
4. Small pieces of leather 3- 5 • Smaller particle (saver dust) will sell to feeder and fertilizer industry.
• Bigger part will sell to end user.
9. Tannery unit has taken provisional membership of Uttar Pradesh Waste Management
Project, M/s Ramky Envior Engineers Pvt. Ltd. regarding disposal of hazardous waste.
10. Approximately, 1717 sqm area is proposed as green belt which is approx. 34% of total
plot area 5034 sqm.
11. The project proposals are covered under category 4"f" of EIA Notification, 2006 as
amended.
The committee discussed the matter and directed to submit following information:
1. No construction/no production affidavit by the project proponent.
2. Site plan/building plan as approved by UPSIDC.
3. Setback details.
4. Details about coal quantity to be consumed as fuel.
5. Proposal with supporting documents regarding establishment of multi cyclone
dust collector.
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 15 of 44
6. Design for primary treatment to achieve standards for input of CETP.
7. Plan for solar evaporation plant.
8. Plan for separate industrial and storm water drainage. All drains shall be
covered.
9. 33% of plot area should be developed as green belt. Plan should be submitted.
10. Plan for flow meters at outlet and H2S monitors.
11. Project cost and CSR details.
The matter shall be discussed after submission of information as above.
21. "Bio Medical Waste Treatment Facility" at Village-Banka, Tehsil-Post,
Bahadurganj, District-Ghazipur, Uttar Pradesh, M/s Silkon Welfare Society, Sri
Vinay Kumar Rai,3, Kanchanpur, DLW, Varanasi. File No. 2878/OSD-T
The committee noted that an undated application received on 03/03/2015 was made
by the project proponent for environmental clearance of "Bio Medical Waste Treatment
Facility" at Village-Banka, Tehsil-Post, Bahadurganj, District-Ghazipur, Uttar Pradesh, M/s
Silkon Welfare Society.
A presentation was made by Shri Vinay Rai, representative of project proponent
alongwith their consultant M/s Perfact Enviro Solutions Pvt. Ltd. The proponent, through the
documents submitted and the presentation made, informed the committee that:-
1. The Environmental Clearance is sought for "Bio Medical Waste Treatment Facility"
at Village-Banka, Tehsil-Post, Bahadurganj, District-Ghazipur, Uttar Pradesh, M/s
Silkon Welfare Society.
2. Salient features of the project are as follows:
Sl. No Description Details
1 Plot Area (sq m) 1,600 Sqm
2 Built up Area (sq m) 1,125 Sqm
3 Total capacity of Plant
Incinerator Capacity
Autoclave capacity
Plastic shredder capacity
5 tons/day
1 ton/ day
2 ton/ day
1.5 tons/ day
4 Water Requirement (KLD) 8 KLD
5 Source of Water Ground water
6
ETP 10 KLD
7 Power Requirement (KVA) 30 KVA
8 Source of Power Purvanchal Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Limited (PVVNL)
9 Backup Power
(Source & Capacity)
1× 62.5 KVA (1× 62.5 KVA as a standby)
3. Land use details are as follows:
Area in Sqm % Area
Work shed 1050 66
Office block 50 3
D.G room 25 1
Green belt 250 16
Open space 200 12
Guard room 25 2
Total 1600 100
4. Water requirement and waste water generation details as follows:
Particulars Water Requirement Waste Water Discharge (in KLD)
Washing 5 KLD 4.2 KLD
Wet Scrubber 0.5 KLD
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 16 of 44
Boiler 0.5 KLD
Domestic Use 2 KLD 1.8 KLD
Total 8 KLD 6 KLD
5. Source of waste details:
� Major sources
• Hospitals/nursing homes/ dispensaries.
• Primary health centers.
• Medical colleges and research centers/ paramedic services.
� Minor sources
• Physicians/ dentists’ clinics
• Blood donation camps
6. Proposed activities of the project as follows:
� Collection
• Segregated waste shall be collected in the different colour coded liners placed
in bins or in coloured plastic bins as Yellow, Red, Blue and Black.
• Door to door collection facility will be provide to health care units.
� Transportation
• Waste shall be transported by 10 fully covered specially designed vehicle (as
per the guidelines of CPCB).
• Separate cabins for driver/staff and the bio medical waste.
• The vehicles will be properly labelled with the symbol of Biohazard as per
schedule III of the Rules and will display the name, address and telephone
number of the Company.
• The inner surface of the waste cabin will be made of smooth surface to
minimize water retention.
• The waste cabin will have provision for sufficient opening from rear side so
that Bio Medical Waste can be easily loaded and unloaded.
• The vehicles will be provided with the first aid kit to handle emergency
situations.
• Mobile phones will be given at all the vehicles for effective supervision and
monitoring of collection and transportation work.
� Treatment
• 3 types of treatment will be provide in biomedical waste management facility-
Incineration, Autoclaving & Shredder.
• Separate rooms for all the three equipments will be made.
� Final Disposal
• Plastic waste after disinfection and shredding will be handed over to
authorized plastic waste recycler.
• Disinfected sharps will be encapsulated on site.
• A non leachate and covered ash pit will be provided inside the CBWTF for
deep burial of Incineration ash.
• Final waste, i.e. incinerated ash will be dumped in the deep burial unit.
7. Category details of bio medical waste :
Option Waste Category Treatment & Disposal
Category No. 1 Human Anatomical Waste Incineration /deep burial
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 17 of 44
(human tissues, organs, body parts)
Category No. 2 Animal Waste
(animal tissues, organs, body parts carcasses, bleeding
parts, fluid, blood and experimental animals used in
research, waste generated by veterinary hospitals,
colleges, discharge from hospitals, animal houses)
Incineration/deep burial
Category No. 3 Microbiology & Biotechnology Waste
(Wastes from laboratory cultures, stocks or micro-
organisms live or vaccines, human and animal cell
culture used in research and infectious agents from
research and industrial laboratories, wastes from
production of biologicals, toxins, dishes and devices used
for transfer of cultures)
Local autoclaving/micro-
waving/incineration
Category No. 4 Waste Sharps (needles, syringes, scalpels, blade, glass, etc. that may
cause punture and cuts. This includes both used and
unused sharps)
Disinfection (chemical treatment)/ autoclaving/
microwaving and mutilation/
shredding
Category No. 5 Discarded Medicines and Cytotoxic drugs
(Waste comprising of outdated, contaminated and
discarded medicines)
Incineration/ destruction and
drugs disposal in secured
landfills
Category No. 6 Soiled Waste
(items contaminated with blood, and body fluids
including cotton, dressings, soiled plaster casts, lines,
bedding, other material contaminated with blood)
Incineration/ autoclaving/
microwaving
Category No. 7 Solid Waste
(Waste generated from disposal items other than the
sharps such a tubings, catheters, intravenous sets etc.)
Disinfection by chemical
treatment/ autoclaving/
microwaving and
mutilation/shredding
Category No. 8 Liquid Waste (Waste generated from laboratory and washing, cleaning,
housekeeping and disinfecting activities)
Disinfection by chemical treatment and discharge into
drains
Category No. 9 Incineration Ash
Ash from incineration of any bio-medical waste)
Disposal in municipal
landfill
Category No. 10 Chemical Waste
(Chemicals used in production of biologicals, chemicals
used in production of biologicals, chemicals used in
disinfection, as insectricides, etc.)
Chemical treatment and
discharge into drains for
liquids and secured landfill
for solids
8. Wastes management details are as follows:
� Industrial waste management:
• Incineration Ash will be generated as end product which will be dumped into
deep burial.
• Plastic bottles treated from plastic shredder will be given to the recyclers.
• Glass bottles shall be sold to recycler.
• Sharps will be treated in autoclave.
� Municipal Solid waste management:
• 7.5 kg/day solid waste will generate from 50 persons who will be engaged as
staff in operation phase.
• MSW from staff will be treated in Organic waste convertor.
� Hazardous waste management:
• Used oil from the D.G set and incinerator will be collected in black colour
coded plastic container.
• Waste shall be collected in the leak proof containers at isolated place and then
it will be given to approve vendor of CPCB as per hazardous waste rules,
2011.
9. The project proposal falls under category 7(da) of EIA Notification, 2006 (as
amended).
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 18 of 44
The committee discussed the matter and recommended following TORs for
conducting EIA studies regarding the proposals in view of amendment in EIA Notification
dated 17/04/2015:
Additional TORs :
1. Executive summary of the project – giving a prima facie idea of the objectives of the
proposal, use of resources, justification, etc. In addition, it should provide EMP. 2. Justification for selecting the proposed capacity of the incineration facility.
3. Status of project with reference to guidelines of CPCB regarding establishment of Bio Medical Waste Disposal Facilities.
4. Establishment of the facility as per Bio Medial Waste (Management & Handling) Rules 1998 (as amended).
5. Land requirement for the facility including its break up for various purposes, its availability and optimization.
6. Details of proposed layout clearly demarcating various activities such as security,
7. Waste Storage Rooms, Waste Treatment Equipment Rooms/Areas, Treated Waste
Storage Room, Pollution Control Devices like APCS and ETP, ash storage/disposal
area, vehicle washing areas, and others such as admin area, worker’s room, health
centers, greenbelt, etc.
8. Details on collection and transportation of Bio Medical Waste from health care
establishments. No. of vehicles and feature of vehicles, etc.
9. Details of waste storage facilities/rooms.
10. Treated water to be recycled and Commitment of zero discharge is to be submitted.
11. Details of the treatment equipment’s capacity and make.
12. Details of the incineration system – a statement on the compliance to the CPCB
guidelines for common bio medical waste incinerators in respect of waste feed
cutoffs, operating parameters of combustion chambers, flue gas cleaning, ash handling, etc.
13. Details on fuel requirement for incineration. 14. Details on flue gas emissions discharge through stack and proposed pollution control
technologies. 15. Details on residue/ash generation and management.
16. Details of waste heat utilization, if any. 17. Details on wastewater management alongwith zero discharge plans as committed by
the project proponent.
18. Details of the proposed overall safety and health protection measures.
19. Details on source of water and power to the facility.
20. Details of the existing access road(s)/walkways to the designed operations in the site
and its layout.
21. Location of the incineration facility and nearest habitats with distances from the
facility to be demarcated on a toposheet (1: 50000 scale).
22. Landuse map based on satellite imagery including location specific sensitivities such
as national parks / wildlife sanctuary, villages, industries, etc.
23. Topography details.
24. Surface water quality of nearby water bodies.
25. Details on proposed groundwater monitoring wells, locations, frequency of
monitoring, parameters, etc. 26. Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary provision
amounting to 2% of total project cost shall be prepared and approved by Board of Directors of the company. A copy of resolution as above shall be submitted to the
authority alongwith list of beneficiaries with their mobile nos./address.
27. Action plan for the greenbelt development in accordance to CPCB published
guidelines.
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 19 of 44
28. Details on pollution control technologies and online monitoring equipments.
29. Details on monitoring of pollutants at source –performance of the incinerator.
including operating hours, fuel consumption, operating parameters (Combustion
chamber – temperature, pressure, Stack temperature, total particulate matter, HCl,
NOx as per Bio Medial Waste (Management & Handling) Rules 1998.
30. Stack and fugitive emissions may be monitored for SPM, HCL & NO2 as per Bio
Medial Waste (Management & Handling) Rules 1998.
31. Specific programme to monitor safety and health protection of workers. 32. Details of Administrative and technical organizational structure.
33. EMP devised to mitigate the adverse impacts of the project should be provided along with item-wise cost of its implementation (Capital and recurring costs).
34. Details of the emergency preparedness plan and on-site & off-site disaster management plan.
35. Affidavit to be submitted for the actual surveys done with detailed photographs of
monitoring etc.
The final EIA report after incorporation of public hearing observations/comments
should be submitted to the committee for further consideration of the matter.
22. Group Housing Project “Ozone Classic” at Khasra No-823, 826, Vill-Noor Nagar,
Ghziabad & Khasra No- 834, 835, 838 TO 843, Vill-Saddik Nagar, Ghaziabad. File
No. 3137/DD-Sh.
The project proponent did not appear. The committee discussed and deliberated that
project file should be closed and should be opened only after request from the project
proponent. The file shall not be treated as pending at SEIAA/SEAC.
23. “ATS Le Grandiose” at Plot No-SC-01/C-A1, Sports City, Sector-150, Noida. Sri S.J.
Raza, Flat No-G-25, Block-C,4, Gaur Global Village, Ghaziabad. File No. 3192/DD-
Sh.
The committee noted that an application dated 16/06/2015 was made by the project
proponent for environmental clearance of Group Housing Project “ATS LE Grandiose” at
Plot No-SC-01/C-A1, Sports City, Sector-150, Noida, M/s Nobility Estates Pvt. Ltd.
A presentation was made by Shri Varun Juneja, representative of project proponent
alongwith their consultant M/s J M Enviro Net Pvt. Ltd. The proponent, through the
documents submitted and the presentation made, informed the committee that:-
1. The Environmental Clearance is sought for Group Housing Project “ATS LE
Grandiose” at Plot No-SC-01/C-A1, Sports City, Sector-150, Noida, M/s M/s
Nobility Estates Pvt. Ltd.
2. Salient features of the project as follows:
PROJECT DETAILS DESCRIPTION
Project name “ATS LE GRANDIOSE” of M/s Nobility Estates Pvt. Ltd.
Type of project Building Construction Project
Total Plot area 80937.130 sq. m.
Built-up area 224595.10 sq. m
{F.A.R (12531.384 sq. m) + Non F.A.R (17946.081 sq. m) + Basement
(86117.64 sq. m)}
Ground coverage Permissible: 22942.400 sq.m
Proposed: 9753.029 sq. m
F.A.R. Permissible: 121405.695 sq. m
Proposed: 120531.384 sq. m
Maximum Building height 86.50 Meters
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 20 of 44
No. of floors & basements 2 Basement + Ground Floor + 24 Upper Floors
No. of dwelling units Main Dwelling Units – 806
Parking facilities Required Parking- 1518 ECS
Provided Parking- 1779 ECS
Power requirement & source 4034.668 KW
Source :- Local grid supply of Noida
Power backup 4 D. G of total capacity 3780 KVA (3 X 1010 KVA + 1 X 750 KVA)
Water requirement & source Water requirement will be 599 KLD
Fresh Water : 298 KLD
Recycled Water: 301 KLD
Source: Municipal Water supply & Private Water Tankers Supply
Capacity of STP 450 KLD
Solid wastes generation Total solid waste - 2077 kg/day
(Residential – 1813.50 kg/day + Floating – 264.25 kg/day)
Estimated population 5087 Persons
(Resident: 4030 Persons + Floating- 1057 Persons)
Green-area 39786.95 sq. m (49.15%)
Rain water harvesting pits 08 nos.
3. Tower wise details of the project are as follows:
S. No. Tower Floors Flats per Floor Total no. of Flats/Units
1 Tower No. 5 (Type B’) 2B+G+4 2 8
2 Tower No. 6 (Type A) 2B+G+23 2 46
3 Tower No. 7 (Type A) 2B+G+23 2 46
4 Tower No. 8 (Type A) 2B+G+23 2 46
5 Tower No. 9 (Type B) 2B+G+23 2 46
6 Tower No. 10 (Type B) 2B+G+23 2 46
7 Tower No. 11 (Type C) 2B+G+24 G.F.-2, 1 to21 – 3, 22to24-2 71
8 Tower No. 12 (Type C) 2B+G+24 G.F.-2, 1 to21 – 3, 22to24-2 71
9 Tower No. 14 (Type C) 2B+G+24 G.F.-2, 1 to21 – 3, 22to24-2 71
10 Tower No. 15 (Type C) 2B+G+24 G.F.-2, 1 to21 – 3, 22to24-2 71
11 Tower No. 16 (Type C) 2B+G+24 G.F.-2, 1 to21 – 3, 22to24-2 71
12 Tower No. 17 (Type C) 2B+G+24 G.F.-2, 1 to21 – 3, 22to24-2 71
13 Tower No. 18 (Type C) 2B+G+24 G.F.-2, 1 to21 – 3, 22to24-2 71
14 Tower No. 19 (Type C) 2B+G+24 G.F.-2, 1 to21 – 3, 22to24-2 71
TOTAL UNITS / Flats 806
4. Water calculation details are as follows:
S.
No.
Particulars Expected
Population
Base of
Calculation
(lpcd)
Water
For
Flushing
Purpose
(KLD)
Water
Required For
Domestic
Purpose
(KLD)
Total Water
Consumption
(KLD)
1. Dwelling Units
(806)
4030
@ 5 persons/unit
86 84.63 261.95 346.58
2. Visitors 403
@ 10% of the population
15 5.64 0.40 6.04
3. Club & Facilities 654
@ 3 sq. m. per
person
15 9.15 0.65 9.80
4. Green Belt
(39786.95 SQ. M)
- @ 5.1
Lit / sq. m.
- - 202.00
5. Filter Back wash - - - - 25.00
6. Water Body - - - - 10.00
Total 5087 99.42 say
99 KLD
263 KLD 599 KLD
5. The project proposal falls under category 8(b) of EIA Notification, 2006 (as
amended).
The committee discussed the matter and recommended following TORs and general
guidelines for conducting EIA studies regarding the proposals:
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 21 of 44
Additional TORs :
1. Master plan of the area showing proposed project.
2. Submit approved layout plan.
3. Permissible uses of the proposed site as per zoning regulation.
4. Allotment letter from concerned development authority.
5. Physical features within 30 m of the project sites with their ownership.
6. Section details of all road. All roads width to be written with carriage and Right of
way.
7. Setback details/dimensions alongwith map.
8. Area details showing proposed uses as residential, commercial, parks, parking, roads,
other services, facilities of the project also in percentage.
9. Land use approved by the competent authority.
10. Complete Details of facilities to be developed by the project proponent i.e. for which
environment clearance is sought.
11. Use of reflecting paints on roof top and side walls.
12. Details of rain water harvesting are to be given. Underground water tank provision
may be made for storage of storm water.
13. Provision of 100% solar lighting along the road site, stair cases, common places.
14. A site plan showing the project site and its surroundings with physical features and
topographical details, such as land use, contours and drainage pattern, along with
photographs of the site from all four sides, should be included in the background
information.
15. 10% EWS / LIG housing provision shall be made as per Development Authority bye-
laws.
16. Sanctioned plans/maps regarding the project with all services plans.
17. All plans and elevation sections/all service plan/landscape plan/standard
electrification plan/drainage/sewerage plan.
18. Structural plan is to be submitted signed by qualified structural designer.
19. All service plans like sewer drainage water supply rain water harvesting fire fighting
landscape plan is to be submitted.
20. Examine in detail the proposed site with reference to impact on infrastructure
covering water supply, storm water drainage, sewerage, power, etc., and the disposal
of treated/raw wastes from the complex on land/water body and into sewerage system.
21. Water requirement and water management plan alongwith necessary permissions for
discharge. The water consumption may be made more realistic based on reliable data.
Similarly the waste water calculation should be based on factual facts supported by
the authentic data.
22. Hydro-geological investigations be carried out and obtain permission from Central
Ground Water Authority for withdrawal of ground water.
23. Consider soil characteristics and permeability for rainwater harvesting proposals,
should be made to prevent ground water contamination. Maximize use of treated
water by recycling and utilization of rainwater.
24. Make provision for safety against failure in the operation of wastewater treatment
facilities. Identify acceptable outfall for treated effluent.
25. Details of green belt as a measure for mitigation of dust and noise and buffer between
habitation and proposed project.
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 22 of 44
26. Landscape plan, green belts and open spaces may be described separately.
27. Study the existing flora and fauna of the area and the impact of the project on them.
28. Examine existing crèche, education, health facilities, police, post Office, Banks and
other services and make adequate provisions in the proposal.
29. Assess soil erosion in view of the soil characteristics, topography and rainfall pattern.
30. Application of renewable energy/alternate energy, such as solar and wind energy may
be described including solar water heating in the guidelines for entrepreneurs.
31. Consider solid wastes, including e-waste in addition to other solid wastes and their
disposal.
32. Identification of recyclable wastes and waste utilization arrangements may be made.
33. Explore possibility of generating biogas from biodegradable wastes.
34. Arrangements for hazardous waste management may be described as also the
common facilities for waste collection, treatment, recycling and disposal of all
effluent, emission and refuse including MSW, biomedical and hazardous wastes.
Special attention should be made with respect to bird menace.
35. Provisions made for safety in storage of materials, products and wastes may be
described.
36. Disaster management plan should be prepared.
37. Traffic management plan including parking and loading/unloading areas may be
described. Traffic survey should be carried out both on weekdays and weekend.
38. Parking provision is to be made for higher ECS worked out either as per state bye-
laws or construction manual of the MoEF
39. Exclusive Parking area in the basement (excluding other facilities) and surface is to be
clearly mentioned
40. Provide service road for entry and exit to project site.
41. Use of local building materials should be described.
42. Consider provision of DG Flue Gas emissions to be treated in a scrubber. Stack
details with provisos of sampling port for monitoring be described.
43. Work out MGLC for the combined capacity of DG sets.
44. Provide for conservation of resources, energy efficiency and use of renewable sources
of energy in the light of ECBC code.
45. Application of resettlement and rehabilitation policy may be described. Project
affected persons should be identified and rehabilitation and resettlement plan should
be prepared.
46. Examine separately the details for construction and operation phases both for
Environmental Management Plan and Environmental Monitoring Plan.
47. Environment Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary provision of
minimum 2% of the project cost as discussed in meeting shall be submitted on need
base assessment study in the study area.
48. Details of all internal and peripheral roads width.
49. Source and quantity of required water during construction and management of
generated waste water.
50. Project falling with in 10 Km. area of Wild Life Sanctuary is to obtain a clearance
from National Board Wild Life (NBWL) even if the eco- sensitive zone is not
earmarked.
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 23 of 44
51. Declare/submit the running cost of STP and other environmental management
services (e.g., Municipal Solid Waste Disposal, Green belt Maintenance, Water
Management etc.) in the proposals which are to be including in the allotment letters.
52. The proponent will submit the schedule of monitoring/data collection programme to
the Office of Directorate, Member Secretary, UP Pollution Control Board and District
Magistrate of related District.
General Guidelines:
a. A legal affidavit by the Project proponent on Rs. 100/- non-judicial Stamp Paper, duly
attested by Public Notary, stating that:
I. “There is no litigation pending against the project and/or land in which the project is
proposed to be set up (please give name & ownership etc. of the project) and that for
any such litigation what so ever, the sole responsibility will be borne by the Project
proponent.”
II. “No activity relating to this project (i.e. name of the project) including civil
construction has been undertaken at site except fencing of the site to protect it from
getting encroached and construction of temporary shed(s) for the guard(s). (if fencing
has not been done, then the same may be deleted).
III. “I/We hereby give undertaking that the data and information given in the application,
enclosures and other documents are true to the best of my knowledge and belief and
I/We am/are aware that if any part of the data and information submitted is found to
be false or misleading at any stage, the project will be rejected and clearance given,
if any to the Project will be revoked at our risk and cost.”
IV. Project does not fall under any buffer zone of no-development as declared /identified
under any law.
b. Another legal affidavit by the consultant stating “(a) that the prescribed TORs have been
complied with (to be deleted if not applicable) & (b) that details and the data presented
are factually correct”, as per MoEF circular dated 04.08.2009 is also to be submitted
along with EIA.
c. Current, site photographs viewing towards the project area from four directions
indicating date of photograph taken, direction from which taken, name of the project,
and signature of Project proponent along with consultant with seal should be submitted,
so as to ensure that no construction has been started before the grant of EC.
d. EIA should strictly follow the guidelines prescribed in annexure-III to the EIA
notification of 2006 and the Methods of Monitoring and analysis (Annexure-IV):
Guidance for assessment of representativeness and reliability of baseline environmental
attributes detailed under EIA manual January, 2001 and other guidelines in the matter.
e. The status of accreditation of the EIA consultant with NABET/QCI shall be specifically
mentioned. The consultant shall certify that his accreditation is for the sector for which
this EIA is prepared.
f. On the front page of EIA/EMP reports, the name of the consultant/consultancy firm
along with their complete details including their accreditation, if any shall be indicated.
g. While submitting the EIA/EMP reports, the name of the experts associated
with/involved in the preparation of these reports and the Name of laboratory through
which the samples have been got analysed should be stated in the report. It shall clearly
be indicated whether said laboratory is accredited by NABL or approved under the
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 24 of 44
Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (Please refer MoEF office memorandum dated 4th
August, 2009). The name project leader of the EIA study shall also be mentioned.
h. The EIA document shall be printed on both sides, as for as possible.
i. Affidavit to be submitted for the actual surveys done with detailed photographs of
monitoring etc.
The Information’s no (a I , II, III & c) asked under the general guidelines is to be
submitted within 15 days from the date of receipt of the letter and remaining of the
information’s is to be submitted along with the EIA
24. Revision of Environmental Clearance “ATS Pristine” at Plot No-SC-01/A-1, Sports
City, Sector-150, Noida. Sri S.J. Raza, Flat No-G-25, Ground Floor, Block-C,4, Gaur
Global Village, Ghaziabad. File No. 3193/DD-Y
The committee noted that an application dated 16/06/2015 was made by the project
proponent for environmental clearance for Revision of Environmental Clearance “ATS
Pristine” at Plot No-SC-01/A-1, Sports City, Sector-150, Noida, M/s M/s Assertive
Infrastructure Private Ltd.
A presentation was made by Shri Varun Juneja, representative of project proponent
alongwith their consultant M/s J M Enviro Net Pvt. Ltd. The proponent, through the
documents submitted and the presentation made, informed the committee that:-
1. The Environmental Clearance is sought for Revision of Environmental Clearance
“ATS Pristine” at Plot No-SC-01/A-1, Sports City, Sector-150, Noida, M/s
Assertive Infrastructure Private Ltd.
2. The Environmental Clearance for the earlier project “ATS Pristine” at Plot No. SC-
01/A-1, Sector 150, Gautam Buddha Nagar, Noida, Uttar Pradesh was issued by
SEIAA, UP vide letter no. 1792/Parya/SEAC/1624/2013/TAJ dated 12/10/2013.
3. Salient features of the project as follows:
Sr.
No.
Particulars Details
1. Project area (sq. m.) 93072.00 sq. m.
2. Built up (sq. m.) 288060 sq.m.
(FAR: 184013.72 + Non FAR: 27306.18 + Basement: 76650.72)
3. Permissible F.A.R 186059.130 @2.0
Proposed F.A.R 184103.725 @1.98
4. Permissible Ground
coverage(sq.m.)
27921.60 (30.00%)
Proposed Ground coverage(sq.m.) 19198.181 (20.62%)
5. Maximum No. of Floors Basement + G + 24
6. Number of Towers 17
7. Main Dwelling Unit 1068
8. Service Personal Unit 220
10. Building height (m) 83.32
Parking Required (in ECS) 2326
11. Parking Provided (in ECS) 2507
12. STP Capacity (KLD) 500+200KLD
13. Power Requirement 5020.75 KVA
14. DG Set & Capacity 4 DG of total capacity 3655 KVA
[(3 X 1010 KVA) + (1 X 625 KVA)]
15. Population (No of Persons) Total Population – 7780
(Residential– 6220 Plus Floating – 1560)
16. Solid Waste Generation (kg /day) 3189 kg/day (Residential: 2799.00 kg/day; Floating: 390.00 kg/day)
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 25 of 44
17. RWH pits (no.) Provided 14
18 Green Area (sq. m.) 36936.00 sq. m
4. Comparative details for earlier project and proposed project are as follows: S.
No.
Particulars Post Planning Detail as
EC Received
Proposed Modification Total Entire Project
Changes
1. Project area (sq. m.) 93072.00 sq. m. 93072.00 sq. m. No Change
2 Built up (sq. m) 230546.617 sq. m.
(F. A. R- 138732.662 +
Non F. A. R- 19757.719
+ Basement -
72056.236)
288060.004 sq.m.
(F. A. R- 184013.725 +
Non F. A. R- 27306.185
+ Basement –
76650.724)
+ 57513.387
3 F. A. R Permissible 139608.00 sq. m. (1.5%)
186059.130 (2.0%) + 46451.13
F. A. R Proposed 138732.662 sq. m.
(1.4%)
184103.725 (1.98%) + 45371.063
4. Ground coverage (sq.
m.)
Permissible
27921.60 (30%) 27921.60 (30%) No Change
G. C Proposed 16051.102 (17.24%) 19198.181 (20.63%) + 3147.079
5. Maximum No. of
Floors
Basement + G + 24 Basement + G + 24 No Change
6. Main Dwelling Unit 727 1068 + 341
7. Service Personal Unit 283 220 - 63
8. Number of Towers 13 17 + 4
9. Building height (m) 83.32 83.32 No Change
10. Parking Required (in
ECS)
2081 2326 +245
Parking Provided (in
ECS)
2201 2507 +306
11. STP (KLD) 500 KLD 500+200 KLD + 200 KLD
12. Water Requirement &
Source
Total – 585 KLD
Fresh – 349 KLD
Recycled- 236 KLD
Total – 704 KLD
Fresh – 441 KLD
Recycled- 263 KLD
Total =(+ 119 KLD)
Fresh =(+ 92 KLD)
Recycled =(+ 27 KLD)
13. Population (No of
Person)
Total: 6224
Residential: 4805
Floating:1419
Total: 7780
Residential: 6220
Floating:1560
Total: + 1556
Residential: +1415
Floating:+141
14. Solid waste generation
(kg /day)
2517 kg/day
(Residential: 2162.25
kg/day; Floating: 354.75
kg/day)
3189 kg/day
(Residential: 2799
kg/day; Floating: 390
kg/day)
672 kg/day
(Residential: 636.75
kg/day; Floating: 35.25
kg/day)
15. RWH pits (no.)
Provided
22 14 - 8 R.W.H Pit
16. Green Area (Sq. m.) 38510.449 (41.37%) 36936 (39.68%) - 1574.449
5. Water requirement details of the proejct are as follows: S.
No.
Particulars Expected
Population
Base of
Calculation
(lpcd)
Water For
Flushing
Purpose (KLD)
Water
Required For
Domestic Purpose
(KLD)
Total Water
Consumption
(KLD)
1. Dwelling Units
(1068)
5340
@ 5 persons/du
86 112.14 347.10 459.24
2. Service
Personal Units
(220)
880
@ 4 persons/du
86 18.48 57.20 75.68
5. Visitors 622
@ 10% of the
population
15 8.70 0.62 9.32
6. Club &
Facilities
938
L.S
15 13.13 0.93 14.06
7. Green Belt
(36936 sq. m.)
- @ 3
Lit / sq. m.
111.00
8. Filter Back - 25.00
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 26 of 44
wash
9. Water Body 10.00
Total 7780 152.45
say 152
405.85
say 406
704 KLD
6. The project proposal falls under category 8(b) of EIA Notification, 2006 (as
amended).
The committee discussed the matter and recommended following TORs and general
guidelines for conducting EIA studies regarding the proposals:
Additional TORs :
1. Master plan of the area showing proposed project.
2. Submit approved layout plan.
3. Permissible uses of the proposed site as per zoning regulation.
4. Allotment letter from concerned development authority.
5. Physical features within 30 m of the project sites with their ownership.
6. Section details of all road. All roads width to be written with carriage and Right of
way.
7. Area details showing proposed uses as residential, commercial, parks, parking, roads,
other services, facilities of the project also in percentage.
8. Land use approved by the competent authority.
9. Complete Details of facilities to be developed by the project proponent i.e. for which
environment clearance is sought.
10. Use of reflecting paints on roof top and side walls.
11. Details of rain water harvesting are to be given.
12. Provision of 100% solar lighting along the road site, stair cases, common places.
13. A site plan showing the project site and its surroundings with physical features and
topographical details, such as land use, contours and drainage pattern, along with
photographs of the site from all four sides, should be included in the background
information.
14. 10% EWS / LIG housing provision shall be made as per Development Authority bye-
laws.
15. Sanctioned plans/maps regarding the project with all services plans.
16. All plans and elevation sections/all service plan/landscape plan/standard
electrification plan/drainage/sewerage plan.
17. Structural plan is to be submitted signed by qualified structural designer.
18. All service plans like sewer drainage water supply rain water harvesting fire fighting
landscape plan is to be submitted.
19. Examine in detail the proposed site with reference to impact on infrastructure
covering water supply, storm water drainage, sewerage, power, etc., and the disposal
of treated/raw wastes from the complex on land/water body and into sewerage system.
20. Water requirement and water management plan alongwith necessary permissions for
discharge. The water consumption may be made more realistic based on reliable data.
Similarly the waste water calculation should be based on factual facts supported by
the authentic data.
21. Hydro-geological investigations be carried out and obtain permission from Central
Ground Water Authority for withdrawal of ground water.
22. Consider soil characteristics and permeability for rainwater harvesting proposals,
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 27 of 44
should be made to prevent ground water contamination. Maximize use of treated
water by recycling and utilization of rainwater.
23. Make provision for safety against failure in the operation of wastewater treatment
facilities. Identify acceptable outfall for treated effluent.
24. Details of green belt as a measure for mitigation of dust and noise and buffer between
habitation and proposed project.
25. Landscape plan, green belts and open spaces may be described separately.
26. Study the existing flora and fauna of the area and the impact of the project on them.
27. Examine existing crèche, education, health facilities, police, post Office, Banks and
other services and make adequate provisions in the proposal.
28. Assess soil erosion in view of the soil characteristics, topography and rainfall pattern.
29. Application of renewable energy/alternate energy, such as solar and wind energy may
be described including solar water heating in the guidelines for entrepreneurs.
30. Consider solid wastes, including e-waste in addition to other solid wastes and their
disposal.
31. Identification of recyclable wastes and waste utilization arrangements may be made.
32. Explore possibility of generating biogas from biodegradable wastes.
33. Arrangements for hazardous waste management may be described as also the
common facilities for waste collection, treatment, recycling and disposal of all
effluent, emission and refuse including MSW, biomedical and hazardous wastes.
Special attention should be made with respect to bird menace.
34. Provisions made for safety in storage of materials, products and wastes may be
described.
35. Disaster management plan should be prepared.
36. Traffic management plan including parking and loading/unloading areas may be
described. Traffic survey should be carried out both on weekdays and weekend.
37. Parking provision is to be made for higher ECS worked out either as per state bye-
laws or construction manual of the MoEF
38. Exclusive Parking area in the basement (excluding other facilities) and surface is to be
clearly mentioned
39. Provide service road for entry and exit to project site.
40. Use of local building materials should be described.
41. Consider provision of DG Flue Gas emissions to be treated in a scrubber. Stack
details with provisos of sampling port for monitoring be described.
42. Work out MGLC for the combined capacity of DG sets.
43. Provide for conservation of resources, energy efficiency and use of renewable sources
of energy in the light of ECBC code.
44. Application of resettlement and rehabilitation policy may be described. Project
affected persons should be identified and rehabilitation and resettlement plan should
be prepared.
45. Examine separately the details for construction and operation phases both for
Environmental Management Plan and Environmental Monitoring Plan.
46. Environment Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary provision of
minimum 2% of the project cost as discussed in meeting shall be submitted on need
base assessment study in the study area.
47. Details of all internal and peripheral roads width.
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 28 of 44
48. Source and quantity of required water during construction and management of
generated waste water.
49. Project falling with in 10 Km. area of Wild Life Sanctuary is to obtain a clearance
from National Board Wild Life (NBWL) even if the eco- sensitive zone is not
earmarked.
50. Declare/submit the running cost of STP and other environmental management
services (e.g., Municipal Solid Waste Disposal, Green belt Maintenance, Water
Management etc.) in the proposals which are to be including in the allotment letters.
51. Detailed plan of solid waste management with name and address of authorized
vendors to be submitted.
52. The proponent will submit the schedule of monitoring/data collection programme to
the Office of Directorate, Member Secretary, UP Pollution Control Board and District
Magistrate of related District.
General Guidelines:
a. A legal affidavit by the Project proponent on Rs. 100/- non-judicial Stamp Paper, duly
attested by Public Notary, stating that:
I. “There is no litigation pending against the project and/or land in which the project is
proposed to be set up (please give name & ownership etc. of the project) and that for
any such litigation what so ever, the sole responsibility will be borne by the Project
proponent.”
II. “No activity relating to this project (i.e. name of the project) including civil
construction has been undertaken at site except fencing of the site to protect it from
getting encroached and construction of temporary shed(s) for the guard(s). (if fencing
has not been done, then the same may be deleted).
III. “I/We hereby give undertaking that the data and information given in the application,
enclosures and other documents are true to the best of my knowledge and belief and
I/We am/are aware that if any part of the data and information submitted is found to
be false or misleading at any stage, the project will be rejected and clearance given,
if any to the Project will be revoked at our risk and cost.”
IV. Project does not fall under any buffer zone of no-development as declared /identified
under any law.
b. Another legal affidavit by the consultant stating “(a) that the prescribed TORs have been
complied with (to be deleted if not applicable) & (b) that details and the data presented
are factually correct”, as per MoEF circular dated 04.08.2009 is also to be submitted
along with EIA.
c. Current, site photographs viewing towards the project area from four directions
indicating date of photograph taken, direction from which taken, name of the project,
and signature of Project proponent along with consultant with seal should be submitted,
so as to ensure that no construction has been started before the grant of EC.
d. EIA should strictly follow the guidelines prescribed in annexure-III to the EIA
notification of 2006 and the Methods of Monitoring and analysis (Annexure-IV):
Guidance for assessment of representativeness and reliability of baseline environmental
attributes detailed under EIA manual January, 2001 and other guidelines in the matter.
e. The status of accreditation of the EIA consultant with NABET/QCI shall be specifically
mentioned. The consultant shall certify that his accreditation is for the sector for which
this EIA is prepared.
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 29 of 44
f. On the front page of EIA/EMP reports, the name of the consultant/consultancy firm
along with their complete details including their accreditation, if any shall be indicated.
g. While submitting the EIA/EMP reports, the name of the experts associated
with/involved in the preparation of these reports and the Name of laboratory through
which the samples have been got analysed should be stated in the report. It shall clearly
be indicated whether said laboratory is accredited by NABL or approved under the
Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (Please refer MoEF office memorandum dated 4th
August, 2009). The name project leader of the EIA study shall also be mentioned.
h. The EIA document shall be printed on both sides, as for as possible.
i. Affidavit to be submitted for the actual surveys done with detailed photographs of
monitoring etc.
The Information’s no (a I , II, III & c) asked under the general guidelines is to be
submitted within 15 days from the date of receipt of the letter and remaining of the
information’s is to be submitted along with the EIA
25. Building for Integrated "Healthcare Campus" at Plot No-04, Institutional Green,
Greater Noida, M/s ICare Health Projects & Research Pvt. Ltd., Sri K S
Ramsinghaney, CEO, Max House, File No. 2798/OSD-T
The committee noted that an undated application received on 30/01/2015 was made
by the project proponent for environmental clearance of Building for Integrated "Healthcare
Campus" at Plot No-04, Institutional Green, Greater Noida, M/s I Care Health Projects &
Research Pvt. Ltd.
A presentation was made by Shri Anil Kumar Mishra, representative of project
proponent alongwith their consultant M/s ENV DAS India Pvt. Ltd. The proponent, through
the documents submitted and the presentation made, informed the committee that:-
1. The Environmental Clearance is sought Building for Integrated "Healthcare
Campus" at Plot No-04, Institutional Green, Greater Noida, M/s I Care Health
Projects & Research Pvt. Ltd.
2. Salient features of the project as follows:
AREA STATEMENT
Type of Building Institutional
Plot Area 118572.89 m2
(29.30 Acre)
Green Belt Area (25% of the plot area) 29643.22 m2
(7.325 Acre)
Total Buildable Area 88929.66 m2
(21.975 Acre)
Permissible Ground Coverage (35% of Buildable area) 31125.381 m2
Achieved Ground Coverage (16%) 14231.05 m2
Permissible FAR (0.8 of Buildable Area) 71143.73 m2
Achieved FAR (0.75 of Buildable Area) 66395.47 m2
Non FAR
Basement (Block 1)
Basement (Block 2)
13000 m2
13000 m2
Built up Area 92396 m2
Open Area including road & parking and green belt 104341.84 m2
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 30 of 44
Landscape Area 44584 m2
(38% of plot area)
Number of Trees Required (One tree per 80 m2
of open
space)
Number of Trees Provided
1043
1500
Parking Facilities Required: 1446 ECS
Provided: 1454 ECS
Power Requirement and Source
Backup Power
5000 kVA
Source of Power: Electricity Board (UPSEB)
Back up DG sets
(as per requirement) 4 no. DG Sets (each 1250
kVA
Estimated Population Residential – 750
Hostel – 200
Commercial Staff - 500
Visitors - 5000
Hospital- 200 beds
Rain water harvesting pits 04 nos.
3. Water requirement details are as follows:
S.No. Description Total Occupancy Rate of water
demand (lpcd)
Water Requirement
(KLD)
A. Domestic Consumption
1 Residential 750 86 65
Staff 50 45 2.5
B. Other Consumption
1. Commercial Block
Staff 200 45 09
2. Hostel Block
Occupancy 200 86 17
Staff 50 45 2.5
3. Visitors 4500 15 68
Total Domestic Water Demand (A+B) 164
4. Hospital
200 Beds 200 450 90
Staff 200 45 09
Visitors 500 15 8
Total Hospital Water Demand 107
C. Landscaping 44584 m2
1.0 lt/m2
45
D. HVAC (2000 TR), 15 hrs 9 lt/hr/Tr 62*
E. DG Cooling (1250 x 4) kVA, 4
hrs
0.9 lt/kVA/hr 18
Total Water Demand (A+B+C+D+E) 396
Domestic Hospital
Total water demand 396 KLD
Fresh water demand (KLD) 164 KLD 107 KLD
Waste water generation (KLD) 148 KLD 96 KLD
STP/ ETP Capacity (accounting 20% extra) 180 KLD 120 KLD
Recycled water (KLD) 125 KLD
Landscaped development (KLD) 45 KLD
DG set cooling (KLD) 18 KLD
HVAC Makeup water (KLD) 62 KLD
STP Capacity
ETP Capacity
180 KLD (above 20% higher capacity) 120 KLD (above 20%
higher capacity)
Process of STP FAB
Location of STP Open
4.Solid waste generation details are as follows:
Facilities Provided Waste generation norms per unit
Basis of Assumption
Unit Total Waste Generated
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 31 of 44
(MT/day )
Residential 0.30-0.6 kg/cap/day
(i.e. 0.50
kg/cap/day taken)
Source: Manual for
municipal solid
waste management
750 persons 0.38
Hostel 0.30-0.6 kg/cap/day
(i.e. 0.50
kg/cap/day taken)
Source: Manual for
municipal solid
waste management
200 persons 0.10
Visitors 0.15 kg/cap/day Source: Manual for
municipal solid
waste management
5000 persons 0.75
Staff 0.15 kg/cap/day Source: Manual for
municipal solid
waste management
500 persons 0.08
Hospital (assuming
200 bedded
hospital)
Bio medical waste
(0.38 kg/bed/day)
Source: Manual for
municipal solid
waste management
200 beds 0.076
General hospital waste (1.25
/bed/day)
Source: Manual for municipal solid
waste management
200 beds 0.250
Garden & open
space
15 kg/Acre/day or
0.0037 kg/sq m/day
Discussion with
Horticulturists
44584 sq m 0.16
E Waste 0.15 kg/cap/year Source: Manual for
municipal solid
waste management
6650 persons 0.0027
STP Sludge 100 kg per MLD Sewerage Design
Manual
244 KLD waste
water
0.025
Waste Oil Assuming one
maintenance per
year
Negligible
Total Waste Generated (MT/day) 1.82
5.Parking details are as follows:
Parking Norms
Residential
Hostel
Hospital
Commercial
Ambulance
1 ECS /80 sqm of permissible FAR
1 ECS /80 sqm of permissible FAR
1 ECS /65 sqm of permissible FAR
1 ECS /30 sqm of permissible FAR
1 ECS /375 sqm of permissible FAR
Parking Required - Residential = (4986.19*5)/80
Hostel = (2050.58*2)/80
Commercial = (13365.90*2)/30
Hospital = 10632.90/65
Ambulance = 10632.9/375
Total Parking Required
312 ECS
51 ECS
891 ECS
164 ECS
28 ECS
1446 ECS
Parking Provided
Basement = 25000/35
Surface = 18500/25
1454 ECS
714 ECS
740 ECS
6. The project proposal falls under category 8(a) of EIA Notification, 2006 (as
amended).
The committee discussed the matter and directed the project proponent to submit
following information:
1. Approved plan by Greater Noida Authority. 2. Copy of approved layout plan/maps/services plans.
3. Renewal of allotment letter as informed by the project proponent. 4. Area details showing proposed uses as residential, commercial, parks, parking, roads,
other services, facilities of the project also in percentage. 5. Letter/Permission for supply of water from Greater Noida Authority.
6. Proposal for rain water harvesting only from the rooftop. 7. Revised proposal for change in STP/ETP location as discussed should be submitted.
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 32 of 44
8. Proposal for management/disposal of Bio Medical Waste alongwith radioactive
materials, if any. Disposal plan for hazardous waste should also be submitted.
9. Proposal regarding modular STP and guard pond.
10. Section of all internal roads should be provided. Right of way and carriage way width
should be clearly marked on the map.
11. 03 m peripheral green shall be provided around the project inside the project
boundary. According plans should be submitted.
12. The structure design certificate by qualified structure engineer should be submitted. The structural design certificate should preferably be vetted by IITs/CBRI. Provision
of alarm system, to timely notify the employees/residents, in case of occurrence of earthquake/other natural disasters/fire should be provided. NOC from Fire
Department should be submitted. 13. Provision of 100% solar lighting along the road side, stair cases, common places.
14. Facilities for attendants of patients. 15. Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary provision
amounting to 2% of project cost (Rs. 500 crore) shall be prepared and approved by Board of Directors of the company. A copy of resolution as above shall be submitted
to the authority alongwith list of beneficiaries with their mobile nos./address.
The matter shall be discussed after submission of information as above.
26. Group Housing Project at Plot No-GH-5 & 6, Sector-8B, Vrindavan Awas Yojna,
Lucknow, M/s Army Welfare Housing Organization, Col. C N Rawat, Project
Director, Chappan Chauraha, Lal Bahadur Shashtri Marg, Luckcnow Cantt. File
No. 2228/AD(H)
The committee noted that an application dated 05/02/2015 was made by the project
proponent for environmental clearance of Group Housing Project at Plot No-GH-5 & 6,
Sector-8B, Vrindavan Awas Yojna, Lucknow, M/s Army Welfare Housing Organization.
A presentation was made by Col. C.N. Rawat, project proponent alongwith their
consultant M/s Ascenso Enviro Private Limited. The proponent, through the documents
submitted and the presentation made, informed the committee that:-
1. The Environmental Clearance is sought for Group Housing Project at Plot No-GH-5
& 6, Sector-8B, Vrindavan Awas Yojna, Lucknow, M/s Army Welfare Housing
Organization.
2. Area details are as follows:
S. No. Particulars Area in Sq.m. In percentage (%)
1 Total Plot Area 16,943.590 …..
2 Permissible Ground Coverage 6,777.436 40% of plot area
3 Proposed Ground Coverage 4,070.9819 24.02% of plot area
4 Permissible FAR 25,415.385 150% of plot area
5 Purchasable FAR allowed @ of 1.0 of plot
area
16,943.590 100% of plot area
6 Total Permissible FAR 42,358.975 250% of plot area
7 Total Proposed FAR 37,998.815 224% of plot area
8 Permissible Convenient Shops Area 211.794875 0.49% of permissible FAR
Proposed Convenient Shops area 114.162 0.30% of proposed FAR
Residential area 36,827.954 96.91% of total proposed
FAR
Community area 1,012.456 2.66 % of total proposed
FAR
Guard rooms & meter room 44.244 0.11% of total proposed
FAR
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 33 of 44
9 Total Non FAR area 15,149 ….
Basement area 12,617 83.28% of total Non-FAR
Stilts area 2,532 16.71% of total Non-FAR
10 Open Area ( plot area - achieved ground
coverage)
12,872.608 75.97% of plot area
11 Green area required @10% of plot area 1,694.359 10% of plot area
12 Green area proposed @ 28.17 % of plot
area
• Green area for lawn
• Green Belt
4,772.528
2322.96
2541.53
@ 13.17% of plot area
@ 15 % of Plot Area
13 Builtup Area (FAR+Non FAR) 53,147.82 ….
14 Height of the Tallest tower 43 meter ….
3. Salient features of the project as follows:
Name and Location of the Project Proposed Group housing project at Plot No-GH-5 & GH-6,
Sector 8B, Vrindavan Awas Yojna, Lucknow, U.P.
Developers of the project M/s. Army Welfare Housing Organisation
Total Plot Area 16,943.59 m
2
.
Built-up Area(Proposed FAR + Basement area
+ Services area) 53,147.82 m
2
.
Total Water Consumption 160 KLD
Total Freshwater Requirement 101 KLD
(Source: Municipal Supply)
Power Requirement 1685.7 KW
(Source: Uttar Pradesh Power Company Ltd.)
Power Backup 2 DG Sets of total capacity of 820 KVA
(1*500KVA, 1*320KVA)
Total Parking proposed 630 ECS
Solid Waste to be Generated 756 kg/day
No. of RWH Pits 2 RWH
4. Building blocks details are as follows: S. No. Type of building Storey
1 MDA(Tower F & G) 2 BHK
S+12
2 SFA(Tower D & E)
2 BHK
S+12
3 DXA (Tower A, B & C)
2 BHK+ Study
S+12
4. Club G+2
5. Convenient Shops G
5. Population details are as follows: S. No. Types No of unit / Area in sq.
m.
Person Per
Unit
Population
1 Residential Population 336 4.5 1512
2 Visitor 5 % of Residential
Population
---- ---- 76
3 Convenient Shops population 114.162 ---- 69
4 Staff @ 1.5 % of Residential
Population
---- ---- 23
Total Population 1680
6. Water requirement details of the project are as follows: S. No. Description Population /
Area in
sq. m.
Unit water
consumption
(LPD )
Total water
required
(KLD)
Water
requirement for
Domestic Use
(KLD)
Flushing
Water
(KLD)
A Residential
Population
1512 86 130.03 98.28 31.75
B Convenient
Shops population
69 45 3.10 2.07 1.03
C Visitor 76 15 1.14 0.68 0.45
D Staff 23 45 1.03 0.20 0.13
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 34 of 44
E Landscaping
4772.528m
2
3 liter/sqm of
landscape
area
14.31 --- ---
F DG sets --- ---- 4.42 --- ---
G Fire Fighting
Tank
1% of total
Water
requirement
1.54
H Swimming Pool --- --- 5 KL
equivalent
per day
--- ---
Total 160.59
Say
160
101.24
Say
101
33.38
Say
33
7. Waste water details are as follows: S.No. Details Water (KLD)
1 Water requirement for domestic purpose 101
2 Wastewater to be generated from domestic use (@ 80% of domestic water
requirement)
81
3 Water requirement for Flushing Purpose 33
4 Wastewater to be generated from Flushing (@ 100% of flushing
requirement)
33
5 Total Wastewater generated 81+33
=114 KLD
8. Solid waste generation details are as follows: S. No. Category of Solid
Waste
Waste Generation Average Occupancy Waste generated
Residential Refuse 0.3 to 0.6 kg/cap/day 0.45 1680 756
Total waste generated 756 kg/day
9. The project proposal falls under category 8(a) of EIA Notification, 2006 (as
amended).
The committee discussed the matter and directed the project proponent to submit
following information: 1. Approved maps/plans/layout plan from Lucknow Development Authority.
2. Copy of approved layout plan/maps/services plans. 3. No construction affidavit by the project proponent.
4. NOC from Fire Department and Airport Authority of India. 5. Provision for underground storage tank for collection of runoff.
6. Plan for municipal solid waste management. 7. Letter/Permission regarding Municipal Water Supply.
8. Written commitment from Lucknow Development Authority that the project is linked
with Central sewage system of Vrindavan Yojna as submitted by project proponent
for justification of no STP.
9. Proposal for rain water harvesting only from the rooftop. Plan for underground water
tank for storm water storage.
10. Setback details.
11. Section details of all road. All roads width to be written with carriage and Right of
way.
12. 03 m peripheral green shall be provided around the project inside the project
boundary. According plans should be submitted. 13. Internal road width/carriage way/right of way alongwith design should be submitted.
14. Action plan regarding plantation of 500 trees as committed by project proponent.
15. Landscape plan.
16. Plan for convenient shopping and other facilities for residents.
17. Written request from project proponent regarding exemption of CSR with justification
as made by project proponent.
The matter shall be discussed after submission of information as above.
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 35 of 44
27. Proposed Group Housing Project “Pushpanjali Seasons” at Mauza Jaganpur
Mustkil, Tehsil and Distt., Agra, U.P. M/s Pushpanjali Constructions Pvt. Ltd. U.P.
Sri Ganesh Chand Agrawal, File No. 2249/DD-Sh.
The committee noted that the matter was earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated
01/06/2015 wherein the project proponent was directed to submit following information:
1. Section of all internal roads should be provided. Right of way and carriage way
width should be clearly marked on the map.
2. Copy of receipt regarding the payment made to M/s Power Grid Corporation of
India Ltd. for shifting of HT line alongwith proposed schedule for this work
from M/s Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. Location of high tension line shifted as per letter from PCCIL photo copy is to be submitted.
3. Minimum 03 m peripheral green shall be provided around the project inside the
project boundary. According plans should be submitted.
4. Plan for use of LPG/CNG based DG sets alongwith commitment of its sources.
5. The structure design by qualified structure engineer should be submitted. The
structural design certificate should preferably be vetted by IITs/CBRI. Provision
of alarm system, to timely notify the employees/residents, in case of occurrence
of earthquake/other natural disasters/fire should be provided. A well defined
evacuation plan should also be prepared and submitted.
6. Submit the certificate issued by Irrigation Department regarding the site is not
under the flood area.
7. Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary
provision amounting to Rs. 2.0 crore shall be prepared and approved by Board
of Directors of the company. A copy of resolution as above shall be submitted to
the authority alongwith list of beneficiaries with their mobile nos./address.
The project proponent submitted their replies through letter dated 16/06/2015. A
presentation was made by Shri Mayank Agrawal, authorized representative of project
proponent alongwith their consultant M/s Paramarsh. The proponent, through the documents
submitted and the presentation made, informed the committee that:-
1. The environmental clearance is sought for Proposed Group Housing Project
“Pushpanjali Seasons” at Mauza Jaganpur Mustkil, Tehsil and Distt., Agra, U.P.
M/s Pushpanjali Constructions Pvt. Ltd.
2. Area details of the project is as follows:
Items Proposed Area (sq m) As per State Byelaws (sq m)
Total plot area 46100.0
Area under master plan 8760.0
Plot area 37340.0
Exclusive Green Area 3734.0 (10%)
Net plot area 33606.0
Ground Coverage 11978.64 (35.6%) 13459.15 (40%)
Compensatory FAR (50% of road widening) 4380.0
FAR 108976.43 (3.24) 116123.82
(3.45)
Basement Area (2 layers) 16024.18 (upper)
6388.28 (lower)
Machine & Mumpty Area 261
Total Built up area 131649.89
Open area 21627.36 (58%)
Landscape area (hard & soft) 13,734 (41%)
No. of Trees 350 nos. 338 nos. (1 tree/75 sq. mt. of
total open area)
Units 818 nos.
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 36 of 44
Estimated Population Residential – 4090 (@ 5
person/unit)
Floating - 400
Staff – 50
Area utilization 08 Residential Towers
Maximum Height 42 m (S+13)
3. Block breakup details are as follows Residential Units Description
Residential Towers Block -A 254 Stilt + 12 Floors
Block -B 104 Stilt + 13 Floors
Block -C 104 Stilt + 13 Floors
Block -D 104 Stilt + 13 Floors
Block -E 104 Stilt + 13 Floors
Block -F 104 Stilt + 13 Floors
Block-G 44 Stilt + 11 Floors
Total 818 housing units
4. Water calculation details of the project is as follows:
Description Total
Occupancy
Rate of water demand
(lpcd)
Total
Fresh
Water
(KLD)
Total
Flushing/Recycled
water (KLD)
Total
Water
(KLD)
Residential 4090 Fresh Water @ 65 LPCD
Flushing Water @ 21
LPCD
265.8 86 352
Visitors (10%) 400 Fresh Water @ 5 LPCD
Flushing Water @ 10
LPCD
2 4 6
Staff 50 Fresh Water @ 30 LPCD
Flushing Water @ 15
LPCD
1.5 0.75 2.25
Landscape
development
13,734 sqm 1 l/sqm 13.5 13.5
Cooling water
for generator set
200 kVA 0.9 l/kVA/Hr 1.5 1.5
Total water 269.3
~269
105.75
~106
~375
5. Waste water details of the project is as follows: Water/ Waste water Details
Fresh water 269 KLD
Domestic Flushing water 91 KLD
Domestic wastewater 360 KLD
Horticulture / Landscape 13.5 KLD
Cooling water for generator set 1.5 KLD
Total water requirement 375 KLD
Waste water 288 KLD
STP Capacity 325 KLD (>15% extra for future expansion)
Water Source Municipal water supply
STP sludge 80 KG/D
• The net fresh water requirement for proposed project is 269 KLD. Wastewater reclaimed after treatment,
will be used for flushing, landscaping, cooling and road washing. 288 KLD will be the total waste water
generated, which will be treated in the STP of 325 KLD out of which, 106 KLD will be treated up to
tertiary treatment & recycled water for various uses including flushing, horticulture and power generator
set cooling and the spare i.e. 154 KLD will be treated up to secondary treatment before its disposal into
Municipal Sewers.
6. 08 nos of rain water harvesting pits are proposed for the project. 7. 1367 ECS proposed for the project.
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 37 of 44
8. Solid waste generation details are as follows: Facilities Provided Waste generation norms per unit Unit Total Waste
Generated
(Kg/Day)
Residential 0.5 kg/cap/day
0.15 kg/c/day - visitors
4090 persons 2105
Garden & open space 0.0037 kg/sq m/day 13,734 51
Total Waste Generated (Kg/day) ≈ 2156 Kg/Day
STP Sludge 250 kg per MLD 325 KLD 80
E waste 1 Kg/day
9. Power and backup requirement details of the project are as follows: Power requirement 4500 kVA
Source of power and supply capacity Grid of UP Power Co. Ltd.
Backup power supply arrangement 2*100 kVA
Location of Generator sets At Substation
Stack Height 2.0 m + Highest Building Height
10. The project proposals are covered under category 8"a" of EIA Notification, 2006, as amended.
The committee discussed the matter and recommended grant of environmental
clearance on the project proposals alongwith general conditions as earlier prescribed by the authority for construction project and following specific conditions:
1. Construction shall be started only after getting prior approval of TTZ authority.
2. 03 m peripheral green shall be provided around the project inside the project boundary.
3. 15% area of the total plot area shall be compulsorily made available for the green belt development including the peripheral green belt.
4. Project falling with in 10 Km. area of Wild Life Sanctuary is to obtain a clearance from National Board Wild Life (NBWL) even if the eco- sensitive zone is not earmarked.
5. Criteria/ norms provided by competent Authority regarding the seismic zone be followed for construction work. Provision of alarm system, to timely notify the
residents, in case of occurrence of earthquake/other natural disasters/fire should be provided. A well defined evacuation plan should also be prepared and regular mock
drills should be arranged for the residents. Rise of stairs should be constructed in a way,
so that it should provide smooth movement.
6. For the treatment for total sewage, a full-fledged STP is to be provided with 20% more
capacity than waste water generated during operation phase.100% waste water is to be
treated in captive STP conforming to prescribed standards of receiving body for
designated use. Monitoring of STP to be done daily till its stabilization.
7. Dual plumbing should be adopted. Recycling of water as proposed shall be undertaken
with regular testing and monitoring of treated water.
8. Dedicated power supply for STPs is to be ensured during operation. Sludge of STP is to
be used in-house as manure and surplus manure should be managed by giving it to end
users. STP shall be suitably located nearest to back side boundary with shortest out let.
Operation and the maintenance cost of the STP shall also be informed along with the
compliance of the E-waste and municipal solid waste disposal. 9. Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary provision
amounting to 2% of total project cost shall be prepared and approved by Board of Directors of the company. A copy of resolution as above shall be submitted to the
authority. A list of beneficiaries with their mobile nos./address should be submitted alongwith six monthly compliance reports.
10. LEDs should be used in all common areas and corridors. 100% solar lighting is to be provided in the open areas/ stairs cases.
11. Parking guideline as per Agra Development Authority should be followed. Parking for
disabled persons should be explored.
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 38 of 44
12. All entry/exit point should be bell mouth shaped.
13. To discharge excess treated waste water into public drainage system, permission from
the competent authority to be taken prior to any discharge.
14. 100 % provision of Rain Water Harvesting is to be made. RWH shall be initially done
only from the roof top. RWH from green and other open areas shall be done only after
permission from CGWB.
15. An underground Pucca tank for collection/reuse of rain water may be constructed.
16. Height of the stack should be provided based on combined LPG/CNG based DG sets capacity and be 6 m higher than the tallest building.
17. Post project monitoring for air, water (surface + ground), Stack noise of LPG/CNG based DG sets, STP to be carried out as CPCB Guidelines.
18. Crèche to be provided during the construction/operation phase. 19. Provision of separate room for senior citizen with proper amenities shall be made.
20. Protection shall be provided on the windows of the high rise flats for security of residents.
21. Unless and until all the environmental issues are sorted out the occupancy will be restricted and would be only allowed after achieving the Permission from the competent
authority.
22. The project proponent shall ensure that the project site does not attract/infringe any
buffer zone of no activity identified/declared under law.
23. For any extraction of ground water, prior permission from CGWB shall be taken.
24. Sprinkler to be used for curing and quenching and ready mix concrete may be used for
construction.
25. Possibilities of use of treated waste water for irrigation purposes should be explored.
Drip irrigation should be tried upto extent possible. No fresh water will be used for
irrigation purpose.
26. Mobile toilets, safe drinking water facility, sanitation facility and eco friendly fuels etc.
Shall be made available to the temporary residents/workers at the project site including the proper treatment and the disposal of the wastes.
28. Group Housing Project “Pushpanjali Heights” at Mau Rod, Agra, U.P. M/s Paawan
Sahakari Avas Samiti Ltd., Sri Ganesh Chandra Agrawal, 35/60, NOBASTA Loha
Mandi, Agra, U.P. File No. 2238/JDCA-S
The committee noted that the matter was earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated
13/12/2014 and in SEIAA meeting dated 12/01/2015 wherein the project proponent informed
that 80% construction work has already been undertaken. The SEIAA directed to take
necessary action as per MoEF OM dated 12/12/2012. In this continuation, Secretary, SEAC
sent a communication dated 03/03/2015 for issuing necessary direction to UPPCB for
initiation of credible legal action in the matter for violation of EP Act, 1986. State Govt.
through order dated 11/06/2015 directed Member Secretary, UPPCB for filing a legal case
for violation of EP Act against the project proponent. Necessary action in this regard is under
process. However, the committee noted that Hon'ble NGT in its order dated 07/07/2015 in the
matter of S.P. Muthuraman V/s Union of India and Ors. (Original Application No. 37 Of
2015 (M.A. No. 291, 293 & 294 Of 2015) and Original Application No. 213 Of 2014 (Ma
755 Of 2014 & M.A. No. 177 Of 2015) has quashed the MoEF OMs dated 12/12/2012 and
27/06/2013 related to provisions for dealing the violation matters. In this situation the matter
may be forwarded to SEIAA for taking necessary action in view of Hon'ble NGT decision
dated 07/07/2015.
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 39 of 44
29. Expansion Of Group Housing Project “Paramount Emotions” at Plot No. GH-5 A,
Sector-1, Greater Noida, U.P. M/s Paramount Homeland Pvt. Ltd. File No.
2989/OSD(T)
The committee noted that an application dated 08/04/2015 was made by the project
proponent for environmental clearance of Expansion of Group Housing Project “Paramount
Emotions” at Plot No. GH-5 A, Sector-1, Greater Noida, U.P. M/s. Paramount Homeland Pvt.
Ltd.
A presentation was made by Shri Madan Bisht, representative of project proponent
alongwith their consultant M/s Grass Roots Research & Creation India (P) Ltd. The
proponent, through the documents submitted and the presentation made, informed the
committee that:-
1. The Environmental Clearance is sought for Expansion of Group Housing Project
“Paramount Emotions” at Plot No. GH-5 A, Sector-1, Greater Noida, U.P. M/s.
Paramount Homeland Pvt. Ltd.
2. M/s Paramount Homeland Pvt. Ltd. has been granted Environment Clearance for
Group Housing Project “Paramount Emotions” located at Plot No. GH-5A, Sector-
1, Greater Noida, District Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh vide reference no.
268/988/SEAC/2010/AD(H) dated 6th May,2013 for plot area 45,641 sq.m
(11.2781 acres) and built up area 1,79,136.24 sq.m.
3. The Project Proponent expand the project built up area from 1,79,136.24 sq.m. to
247496.957 sq. m.
4. Comparative area details of the project are as follows:
S.NO. DESCRIPTION VALUES IN
ACCORDED
EC
EXPANSION TOTAL
(EXISTING+
EXPANSION)
Percentage
wise area
1. Total Plot Area 45,641 (11.2781 acres) 100
2. Permissible ground coverage
(@ 35% of plot area
15974.35
3. Proposed ground coverage 10454.59 795.74 11250.33 24.65
4. Total Permissible FAR (a+b) 125512.75 34230.75 159743.5 350
a. Permissible FAR (@275% of plot area)
125512.75
b. Purchasable FAR --- 34230.75 34230.75
5. Permissible Additional FAR
(@15% of total permissible
FAR)
18826.91 5134.615 23961.525
6. Total proposed FAR 123774.019 35915.03 159689.046 349.8
7. Proposed Additional 15% FAR 12693.216 4596.586 17289.802 37.9
8. Total Basement 1 area (a+b) 40409.256 88.53
a. Basement area included
in 15% additional FAR
1127.38 --- 1127.38
b. Basement area excluding
15% additional FAR
39281.876 --- 39281.876
9.
Stilt/podium Area 7014.329 27849.101 34863.43 76.38
a. Stilt/podium area included in
FAR & 15% Additional FAR
3627.197
b. Stilt excluding FAR & 15%
additional FAR
3387.132 27849.101 31236.233
10. Open Area 35186.41 -795.74 34390.67 75.35
11. Landscape Area (@50% of
open space)
17300 37.67
12. Total Built up area
(6+7+8b+9b)
179136.24 68360.717 247496.957
5.Salient feature of the project are as follows:
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 40 of 44
PROJECT FEATURES Values in accorded EC Total (EC Accorded + Expansion)
Estimated Population 8080 persons 10071 persons
Estimated Water
Requirement
Operation Phase
614KLD (Fresh water = 435
KLD) (Agency: Municipal
Supply)
820 KLD (Fresh water = 545 KLD) (Agency:
Municipal Supply)
Estimated wastewater
Generation
532 KLD 670 KLD
Power Demand 4900 KVA 6,450 KVA
Power Backup 3020 KVA (4 X 380 + 2 X 750)
capacity
4270 kVA (4 X 500 + 2 X 1010 + 250 kVA
each) capacity One of 1010 kVA and one of
500 kVA will be kept as stand by
Source of Power Noida Power Company Limited
(NPCL)
Noida Power Company Limited (NPCL)
Rain Water Harvesting Pits 20 Pits 20 Pits
Solid Waste Generation 3741.48 kg/day 4,621 kg/day
Parking Facilities
Required
Proposed
1592 ECS
1676 ECS
As per MoEF norms: 1645 ECS
As per Greater Noida Bye Laws: 1,997 ECS
2062 ECS (3.25 % more than proposed)
6.Comparison between earlier and proposed project:
DESCRIPTION EC ACCORDED EXPANSION TOTAL
PLOT AREA 45,641
BUILT UP AREA 179136.24 68,360.717 247496.957
LANDSCAPE AREA 17300
POPULATION 8080 1991 10071
TOTAL WATER REQUIREMENT 641 179 820
SOLID WASTE GENERATION 3741.48kg/day 879.52kg/day 4621kg/day
7. Areas wise land use details are as follows:
S.NO. DESCRIPTION AREA IN SQ.M. % wise area
1 Area under residential facility (GC) 10,053.33 22.03
2 Area under commercial (GC) 597 1.30
3 Area under community (GC) 600 1.31
4 Area Under Landscaping 17300 37.91
5 Area under road & remaining open area 17,090.67 37.45
TOTAL PLOT AREA 45641 100%
8. Comparative population details are as follows:
S.NO. Unit type EC accorded Expansion Total
(Existing+
Expansion)
1. Residential 6900 1209 8109
2. Service Personnel 490 158 648
3. Visitors 690 186 876
4. Maintenance staff - 438 438
Total Population 8080 1991 10071
5. Residential D.U. 1380 422 1802
Service personnel D.U. 218 70 288
TOTAL DU 1598 492 2090
9. Comparative water requirement details are as follows:
S. No. Description Area
(m2
) or
D.U
Total
Occupancy
Rate of
water
demand
(lpcd)
Total Water
Requirement
(KLD)
% in term
of total
water
requirement
A. Domestic Water
• Residents 1802 8109 86 697.374 85.04
• Service
personnel
288 648 86 55.728 6.79
• Visitors 876 15 13.14 1.60
• Maintenance
Staff
438 30 13.14 1.60
Total domestic water demand 779.382
B. Horticulture and 17300 1 17.3 2.10
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 41 of 44
Landscape development l/sqm/day
C. *DG Sets (4*500 + 2*1010
KVA + 1*250 KVA)
0.9
l/KVA/hr
23.058 2.81
Grand Total (A+B+C) = 819.74KLD say 820 KLD
S.NO. Unit type EC accorded Expansion Total (Existing+ Expansion)
1. Total water required 641 179 820
2. Fresh water 435 110 545
3. Waste water generation 532 138 670
4. STP Capacity 650 260 910
10. The project proposal falls under category 8(a) of EIA Notification, 2006 (as
amended).
The committee discussed the matter and recommended following TORs and general
guidelines for conducting EIA studies regarding the proposals:
Additional TORs :
1. Master plan of the area showing proposed project.
2. Submit approved layout plan.
3. Permissible uses of the proposed site as per zoning regulation.
4. Allotment letter from concerned development authority.
5. Physical features within 30 m of the project sites with their ownership.
6. Section details of all road.
7. All approved plans regarding proposed extension.
8. All revised services plans.
9. Status of construction with area chart.
10. Area details showing proposed uses as residential, commercial, parks, parking, roads,
other services, facilities of the project also in percentage. 11. Land use approved by the competent authority.
12. Complete Details of facilities to be developed by the project proponent i.e. for which environment clearance is sought.
13. Use of reflecting paints on roof top and side walls. 14. Details of rain water harvesting are to be given.
15. Provision of 100% solar lighting along the road site, stair cases, common places. 16. A site plan showing the project site and its surroundings with physical features and
topographical details, such as land use, contours and drainage pattern, along with
photographs of the site from all four sides, should be included in the background
information.
17. 10% EWS / LIG housing provision shall be made as per Development Authority bye-
laws.
18. Sanctioned plans/maps regarding the project with all services plans.
19. All plans and elevation sections/all service plan/landscape plan/standard
electrification plan/drainage/sewerage plan.
20. Revised structural plan is to be submitted signed by qualified structural designer for
revised proposals.
21. All service plans like sewer drainage water supply rain water harvesting fire fighting
landscape plan is to be submitted.
22. Examine in detail the proposed site with reference to impact on infrastructure covering water supply, storm water drainage, sewerage, power, etc., and the disposal
of treated/raw wastes from the complex on land/water body and into sewerage system. 23. Water requirement and water management plan alongwith necessary permissions for
discharge. The water consumption may be made more realistic based on reliable data. Similarly the waste water calculation should be based on factual facts supported by
the authentic data.
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 42 of 44
24. Hydro-geological investigations be carried out and obtain permission from Central
Ground Water Authority for withdrawal of ground water.
25. Consider soil characteristics and permeability for rainwater harvesting proposals,
should be made to prevent ground water contamination. Maximize use of treated
water by recycling and utilization of rainwater.
26. Make provision for safety against failure in the operation of wastewater treatment
facilities. Identify acceptable outfall for treated effluent.
27. Details of green belt as a measure for mitigation of dust and noise and buffer between habitation and proposed project.
28. Landscape plan, green belts and open spaces may be described separately. 29. Study the existing flora and fauna of the area and the impact of the project on them.
30. Examine existing crèche, education, health facilities, police, post Office, Banks and other services and make adequate provisions in the proposal.
31. Assess soil erosion in view of the soil characteristics, topography and rainfall pattern. 32. Application of renewable energy/alternate energy, such as solar and wind energy may
be described including solar water heating in the guidelines for entrepreneurs. 33. Consider solid wastes, including e-waste in addition to other solid wastes and their
disposal.
34. Identification of recyclable wastes and waste utilization arrangements may be made.
35. Explore possibility of generating biogas from biodegradable wastes.
36. Arrangements for hazardous waste management may be described as also the
common facilities for waste collection, treatment, recycling and disposal of all
effluent, emission and refuse including MSW, biomedical and hazardous wastes.
Special attention should be made with respect to bird menace.
37. Provisions made for safety in storage of materials, products and wastes may be
described.
38. Disaster management plan should be prepared.
39. Traffic management plan including parking and loading/unloading areas may be described. Traffic survey should be carried out both on weekdays and weekend.
40. Parking provision is to be made for higher ECS worked out either as per state bye-laws or construction manual of the MoEF. Comparative chart for previous proposals
and for proposed expansion. 41. Exclusive Parking area in the basement (excluding other facilities) and surface is to be
clearly mentioned 42. Provide service road for entry and exit to project site.
43. Use of local building materials should be described. 44. Consider provision of DG Flue Gas emissions to be treated in a scrubber. Stack
details with provisos of sampling port for monitoring be described.
45. Work out MGLC for the combined capacity of DG sets.
46. Provide for conservation of resources, energy efficiency and use of renewable sources
of energy in the light of ECBC code.
47. Application of resettlement and rehabilitation policy may be described. Project
affected persons should be identified and rehabilitation and resettlement plan should
be prepared.
48. Examine separately the details for construction and operation phases both for
Environmental Management Plan and Environmental Monitoring Plan.
49. Environment Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary provision of
minimum 2% of the project cost as discussed in meeting shall be submitted on need base assessment study in the study area.
50. Details of all internal and peripheral roads width. 51. Source and quantity of required water during construction and management of
generated waste water. 52. Project falling with in 10 Km. area of Wild Life Sanctuary is to obtain a clearance
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 43 of 44
from National Board Wild Life (NBWL) even if the eco- sensitive zone is not
earmarked.
53. Declare/submit the running cost of STP and other environmental management
services (e.g., Municipal Solid Waste Disposal, Green belt Maintenance, Water
Management etc.) in the proposals which are to be including in the allotment letters.
54. The proponent will submit the schedule of monitoring/data collection programme to
the Office of Directorate, Member
General Guidelines:
a. A legal affidavit by the Project proponent on Rs. 100/- non-judicial Stamp Paper, duly attested by Public Notary, stating that:
I. “There is no litigation pending against the project and/or land in which the project is proposed to be set up (please give name & ownership etc. of the project) and that for
any such litigation what so ever, the sole responsibility will be borne by the Project
proponent.”
II. “No activity relating to this project (i.e. name of the project) including civil
construction has been undertaken at site except fencing of the site to protect it from
getting encroached and construction of temporary shed(s) for the guard(s). (if fencing
has not been done, then the same may be deleted).
III. “I/We hereby give undertaking that the data and information given in the application,
enclosures and other documents are true to the best of my knowledge and belief and
I/We am/are aware that if any part of the data and information submitted is found to
be false or misleading at any stage, the project will be rejected and clearance given,
if any to the Project will be revoked at our risk and cost.” IV. Project does not fall under any buffer zone of no-development as declared /identified
under any law.
b. Another legal affidavit by the consultant stating “(a) that the prescribed TORs have been
complied with (to be deleted if not applicable) & (b) that details and the data presented
are factually correct”, as per MoEF circular dated 04.08.2009 is also to be submitted
along with EIA.
c. Current, site photographs viewing towards the project area from four directions
indicating date of photograph taken, direction from which taken, name of the project,
and signature of Project proponent along with consultant with seal should be submitted,
so as to ensure that no construction has been started before the grant of EC.
d. EIA should strictly follow the guidelines prescribed in annexure-III to the EIA
notification of 2006 and the Methods of Monitoring and analysis (Annexure-IV):
Guidance for assessment of representativeness and reliability of baseline environmental
attributes detailed under EIA manual January, 2001 and other guidelines in the matter.
e. The status of accreditation of the EIA consultant with NABET/QCI shall be specifically
mentioned. The consultant shall certify that his accreditation is for the sector for which this EIA is prepared.
f. On the front page of EIA/EMP reports, the name of the consultant/consultancy firm along with their complete details including their accreditation, if any shall be indicated.
g. While submitting the EIA/EMP reports, the name of the experts associated with/involved in the preparation of these reports and the Name of laboratory through
which the samples have been got analysed should be stated in the report. It shall clearly be indicated whether said laboratory is accredited by NABL or approved under the
Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (Please refer MoEF office memorandum dated 4th
August, 2009). The name project leader of the EIA study shall also be mentioned.
h. The EIA document shall be printed on both sides, as for as possible.
i. Affidavit to be submitted for the actual surveys done with detailed photographs of
monitoring etc.
Minutes of 226th
SEAC Meeting Dated 10/07/2015
Page 44 of 44
The Information’s no (a I , II, III & c) asked under the general guidelines is to be
submitted within 15 days from the date of receipt of the letter and remaining of the
information’s is to be submitted along with the EIA
The project proponent also submitted that they had already done the monitoring for
premonsoon season i.e. from March-May, 2015 and requested to accept the monitoring data
to be used in EIA preparation. The committee discussed and deliberated that monitoring data
within validity period as per MoEF directions should be considered. The committee also
directed that since it is an expansion project, the project proponent should submit a
comparative statement on above issues also alongwith EIA report.
(Dr. M. S. Khan)
Chairman, SEAC,UP
(Dr. S.N. Singh)
Member, SEAC, UP
(S. C. Brahmachari)
Member, SEAC, UP
(Dr. D. C. Gupta)
Member, SEAC, UP
(Lalji Rai)
Secretary, SEAC, UP