Final - Bacolod, Special Lecture for La Salle - Sept 17

7/25/2019 Final - Bacolod, Special Lecture for La Salle - Sept 17

1/81

SPECIALLECTUR

ARAREAS inLAOR

L

A

H

O

N

.

E

N

E

D

I

C

T

G

U

I

R

E

Y

K

A

T

O

LABORARBITER(NLRC-NCR)

LAWPROF.,BARREVIEWER, MCLELECTURER


2/81

PART I

JUSTICE D. PERALTA AREAS

PART II

MONEY CLAIMS

PART III

LABOR PROCEDURE: INTER- JURISDICTIONAL M

PART IVPENAL LABOR LAWS: RECRUITMENT & SEXUA

HARASSMENT

LECTUR

EOUTLIN

E

ATTACK TOOLS


3/81

MCQ

Tom is Johns employee.Therefore,!" Tom #$s sele%&e' $n'en($(e' )y John*+" Toms seri%es $re%ompens$&e'

for )y John*-" Toms seri%es %$n )e&ermin$&e' )y John*" Toms me$ns $n' me&ho's$re %on

&rolle' )y John.

ESSA/

Tom, sele%en($(e' )y John,%ompens$&ion for seri%es he ren'el$&&er. Moreoer, h$n' me&ho's $re %on

John #ho %$n $lso him. 0h$& is &he leof Tom2 E3pl$in. !

TYPES OF BAR QUESTIONS


4/81

TAB E OF SPECIFICATIONS

TOPIC: Constl Provisions SUB-TOPIC: Sec. 3,

THINKING SKILLS

RECALL COMPREHENSION

Terms

1, Full ProtectionTextual Accuracy Fill in lan!

"er#al Analo$y Art. 3, %C v. Sec.3, Art. XIII

1, Full &m'loyment(not same as over)em'*

1, &+(-er

0istinctions

1, Col ar$ v. Col e$o

(2ur. Precon*

&numeration

1, Policies(constitutional statutory 'olicy*

2uris'ru4ence

5, FuProt

Contra

1, Partici'ation(su#stance 4eli# a4o't*

KEYA

REAS


5/81

PART I J. PERALTA AREAS

1

LA4OR JURIS5ICTIO62

COMPULSOR/ AR4ITRATIO6CLAUSE

3

LE7AL I6TEREST O64ACK0A7ES

4STATUTOR/ 5UE PROCESS


6/81

ABOR JURISDICTION

ER

LA4OR5ISPUTE

Re!"#$%e C!% C"##e'()"# R%e

Re*e+e#'e (" L$"+ L, R%e

EMPLO/ER

8EMPLO/EE

TWO-TIERED TEST


7/81

PATRICIA HALAGUEA, MA.

ANGELITA L. PULIDO, MA.TERESITA P. SANTIAGO,MARIANNE V. KATINDIG,BERNADETTE A. CABALQUINTO,LORNA B. TUGAS, MARYCHRISTINE A. VILLARETE,CYNTHIA A. STEHMEIER, ROSEANNA G. VICTA, NOEMI R.CRESENCIO, and oth! "#$%htattndant& o" PHILIPPINEAIRLINES,

Petitioners,

- versus -

PHILIPPINE AIRLINESINCORPORATED,

Respondent.

G.R. No. '()*'+

P!&nt

YNARES-SANTIAGO,J., Chairperson,CHICO-NAZARIO,VELASCO, JR.,

NACHURA, ndPERALTA,JJ.

P!o-#%atd

O/to0! ), )**1

THIRD DIVISION

DECISION

PERALTA, J.:

Without FASAP's acti!

"a#tici"atio$ o$ %!ha& o its

!(a&! &i)ht att!$*a$ts+ th!

uti&i,atio$ o th! )#i!a$c!

(achi$!# o# o&u$ta#

a#%it#atio$ .ou&* %! "oi$t&!ss/

Not!0 Th! CBA .as c&!a#/

Th!#! .as $othi$) to i$t!#"#!t/

HAL

A-UE

NAET

AL.

V.PA

L

2O'

(.2/

/0


8/81

THIRD

ESTATE O2 NELSONDULAY, !3!&ntd 04h$& 5$" MERRIDY 6ANEP. DULAY, Petitioner,

- versus!

ABOITI7 6EBSENMARITIME, INC. andGENERAL

CHARTERERS, INC.,"------------------------------------------" Respondents.

PERALTA, J.

DIVISION

G.R. No. '()89)P!&nt

PERALTA,J.,ActiA$A%,VILLARA&A, JR&EN%OZA, ndPERLAS-$ERNA$P!o-#%atd

6n '+, )*

Which "#oisio$ o th! su%1!ct

CBA a""&i!s i$soa# as *!ath

%!$!its *u! th! h!i#s o

N!&so$ a#! co$c!#$!*2 Th!

Cou#t a)#!!s .ith th! CA i$

ho&*i$) that this issu! c&!a#&

i$o&!s th! i$t!#"#!tatio$ o#i("&!(!$tatio$ o th! sai*

CBA/ Thus+ th! s"!ciic o#

s"!cia& "#oisio$s o th! La%o#

Co*! )o!#$/


9/81

LE7AL I6TEREST O6 4ACK0A7ES

NACAR V. ALLERYRAMES

J PERALTAEN BANC13AU.2/13

FINA ITY

BSP

RES . 796

01

July

2013

6!12!


10/81

ART. 277

AMPLE OPPORTU6IT/TO 4E 9EAR5

IRR

9EARI67 CO6:EREWAGE GROU

STATUTOR/ 5UE PROCESS


11/81

PART II: MONEY CLAIMS

1WAE CLAIMS & WAE DISTORTION ADJUSTMENT

2EXTRA-WAE CLAIMS

3OW CLAIMS: SALARIES OR UNEXPIRED PORTION O CON

4SEAARERS: DEATH & DISABILITY CLAIMS

BAC5WAES SEPARATION PAY DAMAES & ATTORNEY6S


12/81

CLEOPAI PPTR DEFEN


13/81

EER TESTS;9OUR-OLD TEST9ECONOMIC DEPENDENCE TEST9TWO-TIERED TEST

9ECCLESIASTICAL AAIR TEST7MINISTEEXCEPTION RULE

NOTE0 3CONTROL TEST4 UN5ER RE6/ MEMO CIRCULAR


14/81

CRISI 8 I Re%()"#!8)9 %% "* e!()"#

C"#(+'(%Re%()"# "* M!(e+ & Se+

I


15/81

IN PERSONAM

9PRINCIPLE OF TOTAL INSULATION

9PRINCIPLE OF LIMITED LIABILITY9PRINCIPLE OF UNALTEREDRESPONSIBILITY


16/81

WAGE

ReMon :i3As P$yCon0orSer :$%

5OU4LE I65EM6IT/ LA0:ACILIT/

: W"%= (8e e

ELIMI6ATE5

COMPRESS@P?>

@P+?

P-?>"WAGE GROU

ART. B

ART 106 109 ( )


17/81

P

C

W

OC

JC

LA4OR STA65AR5S LA0

9EALT9 8 SA:ET/ STA65AR5S LA0

LA4OR RELATIO6S LA0

SOCIAL LE7ISLATIO6S SS LA0"

MERALCO

I6

5USTRIAL

E67I6

EERI67

M+'

814.2//@

ART. 106-109 (D.O.18-A)

NOTE"

Violations of Sec. 7, 8

D)+e'( &C"


18/81

NATIONAL MINES and ALLIED:ORKERS UNION ;NAMA:U


19/81

0A7E 5ISTORTIO6 QUESTIO6S

AS5ED:

WHAT IS A WAE DISTORTION?

HOW IS A WAE DISTORTION DISPUTE RESOLVED?

UN-AS5ED:

1. WHAT ARE THE CHARACTERISTICS O A WAE DISTORT

2. WHAT ARE THE NON-STRI5ABLE LABOR DISPUTES?3. WHAT IS WAE COMPRESSION?

4. HOW CAN A WAE COMPRESSION BE ADJUSTED?


20/81

WAGE DISTOR

0A7E 7ROU>"

ELIMI6ATE5

COMPRESS@P?>

@P+?

P-?>"WAGE GROU

ART. B


21/81

WA$E DISTORTION ADJUST#ENT

THE METROBANK FORMULA

WDA = MINIMUM WAGE X PRESCRIBED INCREA ACTUAL SALARY


22/81

ILLUSTRATION

FACTS

MINIMUM WAGE P300WAGE GROUP A P300WAGE GROUP B P350WAGE GAP = P50CBA INCREASE (FOR WG A) + P 50

WDA = P300 X P50

P350 = P.85 X P50

= P42.85

HOW TO ADJUS

WAGE GROUP B = P350

ADD: P 42.85

P392.85

Q: HAS THE LOST WAGE GAPRESTORED?

A: YES. ALTHOUGH SHOSUBSTANTIAL RESTORATION IS

LA4OR STA65AR5S CLAIMS


23/81

LA4OR STA65AR5S CLAIMSCAUSE O: ACTIO6

EE RELCO)ERA$E PRE-RE*

APPLY

TESTS

SEE

DIA$RA#

E.

O)ERTI#

1.BEYOND NHOURS O

2. WITHIN T

SAME WOR5 DA

NOTE" CEC+ E#PLOYER

DEFENSES( E.$.

PRESCRIPTION

1


24/81

OT9ER EMPLO/ER 5E:E6SES;9IMPROPER VENUE

9PRESCRIPTION

9PAYMENT7WAIVER

9RES JUDICATA

9LAC5 O CAUSE O ACTION

9LAC5 O JURISDICTIONLEX EX CONTRACTU ECCLESIASTICAL AAIR ORUM NON

CONVENIENS


25/81

T,-/-1% -&,3-4&3ll35&ul6%763%&y78LA+&7. D39-3/-4200: 4/%

39-3/y


26/81

NOTE:

oEMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONSHIP

oNO DISTINCTION BETWEEN DAILY-PAID

MONTHLY PAID

oWHETHER OR PROIT OR NOT

oEJUSDEM ENERIS


27/81

EJUS5EM 7E6ERIS

ART. 2'7 ;OLD ADR > YRS. OF SER)ICECOMPO6E6TS

MONTH SALARY 1 DAYS

SIL DAYS

1712 13THMP 2..DAYS

E>E#PLI $RATIA" 22.= > P=00.00 > ' YRS ? P9

C7

Art. 95. RIGHT TO SER6ICE INCENTI6E LEA6E

( * & l 4 4 t l t / i ll # titl 4 t


28/81

(a* &very em'loyee -o as ren4ere4 at least one year o/ service sall #e entitle4 t

incentive leave o/ /ive 4ays -it 'ay.

Book III, Rule V: SERVICE INCENTIVE LEAVE

SECTION 1. Covera$e. Tis rule sall a''ly to all em'loyees exce't:

(4* Fiel4 'ersonnel an4 oth!# !("&o!!s .hos! "!#o#(a$c! is u% th! !("&o!#inclu4in$ tose -o are en$a$e4 on tas! or contract

commission #asis, or tose -o are 'ai4 in a /ixe4 amount /or 'er

irres'ective o/ te time consume4 in te 'er/ormance tereo/

Service Incentive %eave sall not a''ly to em'loyees classi

'ersonnel.8 Te 'rase 7oth!# !("&o!!s .hos! "!#o#(a$c! is u% th! !("&o!#8 must not #e un4erstoo4 as a se'arate classi/ication

to -ic service incentive leave sall not #e $rante4. ;ater, it s

a("&iicatio$ o th! i$t!#"#!tatio$ o th! *!i$itio$ o i!&* "!#so$

%a#or Co4e as tose 7-ose actual ours o/ -or! in te /iel4 cannot #

-it reasona#le certainty.8


29/81

Te same is true -it res'ect to te 'rase 7those who ar

on task or "ontra"t #as$s, %urel& "o''$ss$on #as$s. S

soul4 #e relate4 -it 7/iel4 'ersonnel,8 a''lyin$ te rule on

ener$stat general and unlimited terms are restrained anthe particular terms that they follow. ence, em'loyees en$a

or contract #asis or 'ai4 on 'urely commission #asi

automatically exem'te4 /rom te $rant o/ service incentive lea

tey /all un4er te classi/ication o/ /iel4 'ersonnel.

AUTO 4US TRA6SPORT S/STEMS, I6C. s. A6TO4AUTISTAG/R/ No/ ;/ Ma ;=+ 9:: AD

PP @

>

TASKBASIS:TAXIDRIVER


31/81

ART. 287 (OLD)

1= DAYS ;12 #ONT SALARY P =0

P7(=00

>

P

ODERTIME


32/81

ODERTIME0ORK

E E#ENTS ART. '' O)ER

1. BEYOND NORMAL

HRS O WOR52. W7IN SAME WOR5

DAY.OT

UT

1. BEYOND

LOAD2. W7IN NOR O WOR5

6OTE; !-&h

CA66OT

O::SET

PREMIU


33/81

PREMIUM PA/

30! =0! 60!

R& Dy

%

S5l Dy

Su4/y l/y#" +e%+ HD & RD =e

(" #(+e "* ,"+

Dy "

R& Dy

4/

S5lDy

Dy "

R& D

4/

Rul%


34/81


35/81


36/81

9OLI5A/


37/81

9OLI5A/PA/BASICS PIECERATERS DI)ISOR

1

RE*UISITES

2

2 IN 1 RULE

3F% T,u%

Se'. @$ R%e IVB III

ORILC

N"(e:

T! B!)! #" HP

C"

OT9ER LEADE


38/81

OT9ER LEADE4E6E:ITSA '972 RA 9262 RA 97

SOLO

PARENT

FDAYSI NO DADS

DIOLE6CE

0OME6 8C9IL5RE6"

!> 5A/SPe#=e#'> "*

A'()"#

MA

CART2 U

MONTWITH

>#e'"%D)!"+

G


39/81

SOLO PARENT -alone or solo indischarging parental responsibility.

UnliCoitusIF ADrianiSturneDON

+


40/81

S(+)8( C"

Perio'; + Mon&hs

0orMon&hs

+> Une3pire!s& !+ Mo

/e$rG Mos Po

/e$r+ /e$rsM1l&iplie' )y; -S$l$ries

+ /e$rs 3

S%+)e! *"+ U#e9)+e= P"+()"# "* C"#

SEC. 7( RA 10022" AWARD TE LESSER A#OUNT.

TE UNE>PIRED PORTION RULE


41/81

TE UNE>PIRED PORTION RULE"DE)T OF LAW JURISPRUDENCE

9 SEC. 1/ RA @/42 100

9 MARSAMAN 2 AU. 1000

9 SERRANO 2 APR 2//0

9 SEC. F RA 1//22 2/1/

9 YAP 3/ MAY 2/119 SAMEER OVERSEAS PLACEMENT AENCY V. JOY

CABILES AU. 2/14

SEAARERS: THE THIRD PHYSICIAN RUL


42/81

SEAARERS: THE THIRD PHYSICIAN RUL


43/81

4ACK0A7ES, SEPARATIO6 PA/,5AMA7ES 8 ATT/S :EES

DOUBLE INDE#NITY LAW

WAGES BACKWAGES

RE) #E#O CIRCULAR NO. 39-2012

SAPIO

).

UNDALOC CONSTRUCT

200'

ULL BAC5WAES:


44/81

9O0 :ULL IS:ULL2

1. COMPONENTS BASIC SALARY& BENEITS

2. W7O UALIICATION W7O DEDUC

3. CONTINUES TO ACCRUE UNTIJUDMENT I NO REINSTATEME

4. EARNS LEAL INTEREST ROM IN

NOTE" RE). #E#O CIRCULAR NO. 39-2012 ;=! W


45/81

REI6STATEME6T 0A7ES 6O REI6STATEMJU57ME6T IS REDERSE5 O6 APPEAL

WITH FAULT W/O FAULT

CORPORATE REABILITA

NO OBLI$ATION TO P

UNJUSTIFIABLE REFUSAL

OBLI$ATION TO PAY


46/81

REI6STATEME6T

PAYROLL SEPARATION P

NO REINSTATE#ENT

IN DO ACTS

SEPARATION PAY

INACTS

EFFECT OF RE)ERSAL

NO REI#BURSE#ENTUNJUST ENRIC#ENT PRIN. DOES NOT

APPLY


47/81

MORAL EXEMPLARY

5AMA7ES

ATTOR6E/S :EES


48/81

ORDINARY EXTRAORDIN

ATTOR6E/ S :EES

NATURE" CO#PENSATION

PAID TO" LAWYER

A#OUNT" A$REE#ENT*UANTU# #ERUIT

CI)IL DA#A$ES

E#PLOYEE

10! ;ART. 111UAL ARSS#ENT ACT

ART. 13(B) V. ART. 34


65/81

Art.13(b)

No License/No Authority+

CUTE CPAsHave Cute Red Peanuts

DISTINCT IMPRESSION RULE(Pp. vs. Goce)

Art.34 (R.A.10

With License/Aut+Prohibited Ac


66/81

7OO5, 4A5 8 U7L/ RECRUIT PETER, PAUL 8 MA

RECEIDE PLACEME6T :EES :ROM T9EM. 0IT9OUT :AT9EIR PART, T9E LATTER 5O 6OT 7ET 5EPLO/E5 EDE6O6E /EAR. CO6DICTE5 O: ILLE7AL RECRUITME6T 4ECAT9EIR :AILURE TO REIM4URSE T9E PLACEME6T :EES,

4A5 8 U7L/ APPEAL A65 PUT UP T9E 5E:E6SE T9ATCO6DICTIO6 IS IMPROPER 4ECAUSE O: T9E PROSECUT:AILURE TO PRODE T9AT T9E/ ARE 6OT LICE6SE5.

5ECI5E.

I C E N S E

5E:E6SES


67/81

BAD

Le!! (8# 2 P9 ;!. P#)!Le!! (8# 3 P9 ;!. N;++N" Re'e)9( P9 ;!. J


68/81

09ERE 0ETE6DIRO6ME6T

09O :AT9ER TETE 0 MIA

9O0 5RR SEUAL :ADOR09/ 0 COER"

ET 7AS9OS"

09AT ACCEPTE5, OR

REJECTE5 9OIE6DIRO6ME6T

RA 7'77

In &he USA;


69/81

Se31$l h$r$ssmen& )! #> 1n#$n&e' $&&ense31$l n$&1re (8( 9e+!"# "+ +"9 "* 9e+!"#! e

"# (8e "$ ( !'8""% "+ in p1)li% ,8)'8 )! )#(e+9+eoensie. T8e e> (" (8)! =e#)()"# )! )eh$ior must be unsolicited and unwelcomedvictim.

E3$mplesPhysi%$l;("'8)# )# !e%


70/81

IMA7EMA6IPULATIO6

IMAGE MANIPULATION


71/81

ORIGINALPIC EDITED PI

SPOT THE DIFFERENCE:


72/81

ORIGINAL PIC EDITED PI


73/81

OBJECTS 1


74/81

6u66y 0G7 47

CARROTS TWIN POTA

PASALUBONG

2 3


75/81

CARROTS TWIN POTA2 3

VISUAL & MUSICAL Hello. Is it me youre lfor? I can see it in you

:


76/81

:

NO

S

WO #IA.


77/81

N S H&,u& DRR


78/81

N S H&,u& DRRNOTE" RAYALA CASE

NO

S

TRU BESO BESO

NOTIN$ E SE #

THE ACOSTA CASE


79/81

$ESTURES


80/81


81/81

END

TAN+ YOU

Documents

Final - Bacolod, Special Lecture for La Salle - Sept 17