11

Figure modified from Campbell and Bozorgnia 0.2 ln units = 22% change Arrow: possible choice for 90% Confidence Interval for Median for CA events M ≥

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Figure modified from Campbell and Bozorgnia 0.2 ln units = 22% change Arrow: possible choice for 90% Confidence Interval for Median for CA events M ≥
Page 2: Figure modified from Campbell and Bozorgnia 0.2 ln units = 22% change Arrow: possible choice for 90% Confidence Interval for Median for CA events M ≥

4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0

Moment Magnitude

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

Inter-event Residual

SA(1.0s)

Other

California

Taiwan

Western U.S.Alaska

Figure modified from Campbell and Bozorgnia

0.2 ln units = 22% change

Arrow: possiblechoice for 90%ConfidenceInterval forMedian forCA events M ≥ 6.9

±0.4 ln unitsMedian/1.5To median*1.5Stddev= 0.25

Page 3: Figure modified from Campbell and Bozorgnia 0.2 ln units = 22% change Arrow: possible choice for 90% Confidence Interval for Median for CA events M ≥

-4.5

-4.0

-3.5

-3.0

4 5 6 7 8

Mag

c1 of T3.000S

California Other Regions Taiwan

-2.5

-2.0

-1.5

4 5 6 7 8

Mag

c1 of T1.000S

California Other Regions Taiwan

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

4 5 6 7 8

Mag

c1 of T0.200S

California Other Regions Taiwan

-1.8

-1.6

-1.4

-1.2

-1.0

-0.8

-0.6

4 5 6 7 8

Mag

c1 of T0.010S

California Other Regions Taiwan

Arrow: from median/1.5 to median*1.5

Figure modified from Chiou and Youngs

Page 4: Figure modified from Campbell and Bozorgnia 0.2 ln units = 22% change Arrow: possible choice for 90% Confidence Interval for Median for CA events M ≥

4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0

Moment Magnitude

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

Inter-event Residual

SA(1.0s)

Other

California

Taiwan

Western U.S.Alaska

Figure modified from Campbell and Bozorgnia

0.2 ln units = 22% change

Arrows: possiblechoices for 90%ConfidenceInterval forMedian forCA eventsWith M ≥ 6.9

Black arrowIncreases map values by about 7%.Red arrow Increases map values by about 20%. (when hazard dominated byM ≥ 6.9 events)

Page 5: Figure modified from Campbell and Bozorgnia 0.2 ln units = 22% change Arrow: possible choice for 90% Confidence Interval for Median for CA events M ≥

4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0

Moment Magnitude

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

Inter-event Residual

SA(3.0s)

Other

California

Taiwan

Western U.S.Alaska

Figure modified from Campbell and Bozorgnia

Page 6: Figure modified from Campbell and Bozorgnia 0.2 ln units = 22% change Arrow: possible choice for 90% Confidence Interval for Median for CA events M ≥

M6.6 crustal, strike slip earthquake, Kyushu, Japan, data from K-Net, 5 Hz S.A.

Page 7: Figure modified from Campbell and Bozorgnia 0.2 ln units = 22% change Arrow: possible choice for 90% Confidence Interval for Median for CA events M ≥

M6.7 crustal, strike-slip earthquake in Honshu Japan

Page 8: Figure modified from Campbell and Bozorgnia 0.2 ln units = 22% change Arrow: possible choice for 90% Confidence Interval for Median for CA events M ≥

M6.6 crustal, thrust earthquake in Honshu, Japan

Page 9: Figure modified from Campbell and Bozorgnia 0.2 ln units = 22% change Arrow: possible choice for 90% Confidence Interval for Median for CA events M ≥

M6.6 earthquake in Kyushu, Japan, 1 Hz S.A.

Page 10: Figure modified from Campbell and Bozorgnia 0.2 ln units = 22% change Arrow: possible choice for 90% Confidence Interval for Median for CA events M ≥

M6.7 earthquake in Honshu, Japan earthquake , 1 Hz S.A.

Page 11: Figure modified from Campbell and Bozorgnia 0.2 ln units = 22% change Arrow: possible choice for 90% Confidence Interval for Median for CA events M ≥

M6.6 earthquake in Honshu Japan, 1hz S.A.