1
Figure H-39 FLEXIBLE FUND OBLIGATIONS -- BY STATE; BY UZA FY 2002 - 2006 O bligations by State PA 12.1% OH 3.3% O thers 23.6% CA 30.0% IL 3.2% TX 3.3% FL 3.4% NY 7.2% NJ 6.4% GA 4.5% VA 3.0% O bligations by U ZA O thers 43.1% Los A ngeles- Lng B ch,C A 14.0% Portland- V ancouver,O R 2.2% Cleveland,O H 2.0% M inneapolis-St. Louis,M N 1.8% San Francisco- O klnd,C A 5.0% A tlanta,G A 4.5% N ew Y ork- N ew ark,N Y -N J 12.7% Phil.,PA -N J-D C - MD 7.7% Pittsburg,PA 3.9% C hicago,IL 3.1%

Figure H-39 FLEXIBLE FUND OBLIGATIONS -- BY STATE; BY UZA FY 2002 - 2006

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Figure H-39 FLEXIBLE FUND OBLIGATIONS -- BY STATE; BY UZA FY 2002 - 2006. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Figure H-39 FLEXIBLE FUND OBLIGATIONS  --  BY STATE; BY UZA FY 2002 - 2006

Figure H-39FLEXIBLE FUND OBLIGATIONS -- BY STATE; BY UZA

FY 2002 - 2006

Obligations by State

PA12.1%

OH3.3%

Others23.6%

CA30.0%

IL3.2%

TX3.3%

FL3.4% NY

7.2%NJ

6.4%

GA4.5%

VA3.0%

Obligations by UZA

O thers43.1%

Los Angeles-Lng Bch, CA

14.0%

Portland-Vancouver, O R

2.2%Cleveland, O H

2.0%

Minneapolis-St. Louis, MN

1.8%

San Francisco-O klnd, CA

5.0%

Atlanta, GA4.5%

New York-Newark, NY-NJ

12.7%

Phil.,PA-NJ-DC-MD

7.7%

Pittsburg, PA3.9%

Chicago, IL3.1%