Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
PROVISIONS RELATIONSHIP TO SCHEME AND APPROVAL
Figure 2: Building Envelope
Legend for heights/ storeys:
Sustainability Bonus in ACP
Maximum
Minimum I I
Cecil Ave Other Precinct
shared zone - pedestrian priority design
Urban Stream
Figure 1: LD-p-ivia\ in Plan \
LEGEND no car access
ONE way access limited to left out
TWO way car/ service access
* landmark building
shared zone with building over
/ building orientation
▪ vehicular direction of travel
Cecil Ave Main Precinct
Relationship to Scheme and Residential Design Code Variations
Pursuant to the Canning City Centre Activity Centre Plan (ACP) and City of Canning Town Planning Scheme No. 40 (Scheme) the City of Canning has prepared this Local Development Plan (LDP).
This Local Development Plan (LDP) provides specific provisions for Lots 1, 37, 38, 39, 40 and 41 Cecil Avenue, Cannington. A development within the LDP area is to be in accordance with the Canning City Centre Activity Centre Plan (ACP), unless specifically identified in the Provisions Table.
Definitions
Land uses and terms in this LDP are taken to have the same meaning as in Town Planning Scheme No.40, the LSP Plan or R-Codes.
APPROVAL This Local Development Plan has been approved by the City under Schedule 2 Part 6 Clause 52.(1) of the Planning and Development (Local lanning Schemes) Regulations 2015
Directo anning Sustainable Development City of Ca ning
fq azh201+ Date
LOCAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Lots 1, 37, 38, 39, 40 and 41 Cecil Avenue, Cannington City of Canning
Requirement Clause in ACP Local Development Plan
1 Land Use Preferences Clause 5.2 and Table 4
Active uses are required on Cecil Avenue in the Cecil Avenue Main Precinct. Offices may be considered in the Cecil Main Ground Floor however they must not front Cecil Avenue.
2 Activated Ground floor Uses
Clause 5.4.2(a)
Activated uses are not required to the urban stream at ground level where the upper levels major openings and balconies are orientated to the public realm.
3 Building Response to Public Realm Clause 5.4.9 The ground level to the shared space and urban stream may include car park screening where
the design achieves the requirements of Clauses 5.4.9 (b), (c) and (d) and 5.4.11 of the ACP
4 Diversity through Dwelling Types
Clause 5.4.19
Exemption to comply with this clause may be considered where a Residential Building, Retirement Village, and Aged and Dependent Person's Dwellings are proposed. 5 Storage Units Clause
5.4.24 • 6 Density Table 9
7 Minimum/Maximum Street Setback Table 9 Any variation to setbacks and podium setbacks for Site B facing a public street may be
considered subject to excellence in design and appropriate response to the intent of the ACP.
8 Minimum/Maximum Side Setback Table 9 Variation to setbacks and podium setbacks may be considered for all facades that do not face a
public street.
9 Maximum Height of Walls up to Boundary Table 9
Variation to setbacks and podium setbacks may be considered for all facades that do not face a public street. Any variation to setbacks and podium setbacks for Site B facing a public street may be considered subject to excellence in design and appropriate response to the intent of the ACP.
10 Site Access, Servicing and Loading Areas Clause 5.7.1
A shared pedestrian priority zone is to be provided between Site A and B between the Urban Stream and Cecil Avenuein accordance with Figure 1 of this LDP.
Vehicle access is to be provided in accordance with Figure 1 of this LDP. The egress from Site B to Cecil Avenue is subject to approval from the WAPC.