1
PROVISIONS RELATIONSHIP TO SCHEME AND APPROVAL Figure 2: Building Envelope Legend for heights/ storeys: Sustainability Bonus in ACP Maximum Minimum I I Cecil Ave Other Precinct shared zone - pedestrian priority design Urban Stream Figure 1: LD-p-ivia \ in Plan \ LEGEND no car access ONE way access limited to left out TWO way car/ service access * landmark building shared zone with building over / building orientation vehicular direction of travel Cecil Ave Main Precinct Relationship to Scheme and Residential Design Code Variations Pursuant to the Canning City Centre Activity Centre Plan (ACP) and City of Canning Town Planning Scheme No. 40 (Scheme) the City of Canning has prepared this Local Development Plan (LDP). This Local Development Plan (LDP) provides specific provisions for Lots 1, 37, 38, 39, 40 and 41 Cecil Avenue, Cannington. A development within the LDP area is to be in accordance with the Canning City Centre Activity Centre Plan (ACP), unless specifically identified in the Provisions Table. Definitions Land uses and terms in this LDP are taken to have the same meaning as in Town Planning Scheme No.40, the LSP Plan or R-Codes. APPROVAL This Local Development Plan has been approved by the City under Schedule 2 Part 6 Clause 52.(1) of the Planning and Development (Local lanning Schemes) Regulations 2015 Directo anning Sustainable Development City of Ca ning fq azh201+ Date LOCAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Lots 1, 37, 38, 39, 40 and 41 Cecil Avenue, Cannington City of Canning Requirement Clause in ACP Local Development Plan 1 Land Use Preferences Clause 5.2 and Table 4 Active uses are required on Cecil Avenue in the Cecil Avenue Main Precinct. Offices may be considered in the Cecil Main Ground Floor however they must not front Cecil Avenue. 2 Activated Ground floor Uses Clause 5.4.2(a) Activated uses are not required to the urban stream at ground level where the upper levels major openings and balconies are orientated to the public realm. 3 Building Response to Public Realm Clause 5.4.9 The ground level to the shared space and urban stream may include car park screening where the design achieves the requirements of Clauses 5.4.9 (b), (c) and (d) and 5.4.11 of the ACP 4 Diversity through Dwelling Types Clause 5.4.19 Exemption to comply with this clause may be considered where a Residential Building, Retirement Village, and Aged and Dependent Person's Dwellings are proposed. 5 Storage Units Clause 5.4.24 6 Density Table 9 7 Minimum/Maximum Street Setback Table 9 Any variation to setbacks and podium setbacks for Site B facing a public street may be considered subject to excellence in design and appropriate response to the intent of the ACP. 8 Minimum/Maximum Side Setback Table 9 Variation to setbacks and podium setbacks may be considered for all facades that do not face a public street. 9 Maximum Height of Walls up to Boundary Table 9 Variation to setbacks and podium setbacks may be considered for all facades that do not face a public street. Any variation to setbacks and podium setbacks for Site B facing a public street may be considered subject to excellence in design and appropriate response to the intent of the ACP. 10 Site Access, Servicing and Loading Areas Clause 5.7.1 A shared pedestrian priority zone is to be provided between Site A and B between the Urban Stream and Cecil Avenuein accordance with Figure 1 of this LDP. Vehicle access is to be provided in accordance with Figure 1 of this LDP. The egress from Site B to Cecil Avenue is subject to approval from the WAPC.

Figure 1: LD-p-ivia in Plan Figure 2: Building Envelope

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Figure 1: LD-p-ivia in Plan Figure 2: Building Envelope

PROVISIONS RELATIONSHIP TO SCHEME AND APPROVAL

Figure 2: Building Envelope

Legend for heights/ storeys:

Sustainability Bonus in ACP

Maximum

Minimum I I

Cecil Ave Other Precinct

shared zone - pedestrian priority design

Urban Stream

Figure 1: LD-p-ivia\ in Plan \

LEGEND no car access

ONE way access limited to left out

TWO way car/ service access

* landmark building

shared zone with building over

/ building orientation

▪ vehicular direction of travel

Cecil Ave Main Precinct

Relationship to Scheme and Residential Design Code Variations

Pursuant to the Canning City Centre Activity Centre Plan (ACP) and City of Canning Town Planning Scheme No. 40 (Scheme) the City of Canning has prepared this Local Development Plan (LDP).

This Local Development Plan (LDP) provides specific provisions for Lots 1, 37, 38, 39, 40 and 41 Cecil Avenue, Cannington. A development within the LDP area is to be in accordance with the Canning City Centre Activity Centre Plan (ACP), unless specifically identified in the Provisions Table.

Definitions

Land uses and terms in this LDP are taken to have the same meaning as in Town Planning Scheme No.40, the LSP Plan or R-Codes.

APPROVAL This Local Development Plan has been approved by the City under Schedule 2 Part 6 Clause 52.(1) of the Planning and Development (Local lanning Schemes) Regulations 2015

Directo anning Sustainable Development City of Ca ning

fq azh201+ Date

LOCAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Lots 1, 37, 38, 39, 40 and 41 Cecil Avenue, Cannington City of Canning

Requirement Clause in ACP Local Development Plan

1 Land Use Preferences Clause 5.2 and Table 4

Active uses are required on Cecil Avenue in the Cecil Avenue Main Precinct. Offices may be considered in the Cecil Main Ground Floor however they must not front Cecil Avenue.

2 Activated Ground floor Uses

Clause 5.4.2(a)

Activated uses are not required to the urban stream at ground level where the upper levels major openings and balconies are orientated to the public realm.

3 Building Response to Public Realm Clause 5.4.9 The ground level to the shared space and urban stream may include car park screening where

the design achieves the requirements of Clauses 5.4.9 (b), (c) and (d) and 5.4.11 of the ACP

4 Diversity through Dwelling Types

Clause 5.4.19

Exemption to comply with this clause may be considered where a Residential Building, Retirement Village, and Aged and Dependent Person's Dwellings are proposed. 5 Storage Units Clause

5.4.24 • 6 Density Table 9

7 Minimum/Maximum Street Setback Table 9 Any variation to setbacks and podium setbacks for Site B facing a public street may be

considered subject to excellence in design and appropriate response to the intent of the ACP.

8 Minimum/Maximum Side Setback Table 9 Variation to setbacks and podium setbacks may be considered for all facades that do not face a

public street.

9 Maximum Height of Walls up to Boundary Table 9

Variation to setbacks and podium setbacks may be considered for all facades that do not face a public street. Any variation to setbacks and podium setbacks for Site B facing a public street may be considered subject to excellence in design and appropriate response to the intent of the ACP.

10 Site Access, Servicing and Loading Areas Clause 5.7.1

A shared pedestrian priority zone is to be provided between Site A and B between the Urban Stream and Cecil Avenuein accordance with Figure 1 of this LDP.

Vehicle access is to be provided in accordance with Figure 1 of this LDP. The egress from Site B to Cecil Avenue is subject to approval from the WAPC.