18
A-251 Appendix 17 Damaged Breakwater (1) Concrete Stair Landing (no water at low tide) (2) Shallow basin at low tide (3) Fig. 17.15 Calabanga Fish Port (3) (2) (1)

Fig. 17.15 Calabanga Fish Port · 2011. 1. 26. · Fig. 17.16 Pasacao Fish Port (3) (2) (1) A-253 Appendix 17 Present condition of causeway (1) Proposed back up area for fish port

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Fig. 17.15 Calabanga Fish Port · 2011. 1. 26. · Fig. 17.16 Pasacao Fish Port (3) (2) (1) A-253 Appendix 17 Present condition of causeway (1) Proposed back up area for fish port

A-251

Appendix 17

D

amag

ed B

reak

wat

er (1

)

Con

cret

e St

air

Lan

ding

(no

wat

er a

t low

tide

) (2)

Sh

allo

w b

asin

at l

ow ti

de (3

)

Fig.

17.

15

Cal

aban

ga F

ish

Port

(3)

(2)

(1)

Page 2: Fig. 17.15 Calabanga Fish Port · 2011. 1. 26. · Fig. 17.16 Pasacao Fish Port (3) (2) (1) A-253 Appendix 17 Present condition of causeway (1) Proposed back up area for fish port

A-252

Appendix 17

Pr

esen

t con

ditio

n of

Jet

ty c

onst

ruct

ed 2

004

as fe

eder

por

ts (1

)

Con

cret

e St

air

Lan

ding

(2)

Te

mpo

rary

Mar

ket H

all t

o be

reh

ab. (

3)

Fig.

17.

16

Pasa

cao

Fish

Por

t

(3)

(2)

(1)

Page 3: Fig. 17.15 Calabanga Fish Port · 2011. 1. 26. · Fig. 17.16 Pasacao Fish Port (3) (2) (1) A-253 Appendix 17 Present condition of causeway (1) Proposed back up area for fish port

A-253

Appendix 17

Pr

esen

t con

ditio

n of

cau

sew

ay (1

)

Prop

osed

bac

k up

are

a fo

r fis

h po

rt fa

cilit

ies (

2)

A

cces

s Roa

d (3

)

Fig.

17.

17

Bal

atan

Fis

h Po

rt

(3)

(2)

(1)

Page 4: Fig. 17.15 Calabanga Fish Port · 2011. 1. 26. · Fig. 17.16 Pasacao Fish Port (3) (2) (1) A-253 Appendix 17 Present condition of causeway (1) Proposed back up area for fish port

A-254

Appendix 17

Pr

opos

ed F

ish

Port

are

a al

ong

shor

e lin

e (1

)

Prop

osed

Fis

h Po

rt a

rea

alon

g sh

ore

line

(2)

A

cces

s Roa

d (3

)

Fig.

17.

18

Oas

Fis

h Po

rt

(3)

(2) (1

)

Page 5: Fig. 17.15 Calabanga Fish Port · 2011. 1. 26. · Fig. 17.16 Pasacao Fish Port (3) (2) (1) A-253 Appendix 17 Present condition of causeway (1) Proposed back up area for fish port

A-255

Appendix 17

Pr

esen

t con

ditio

n of

cau

sew

ay to

be

rais

ed u

p (1

)

Fish

cag

es in

Tag

abur

i bay

(2)

Ti

p of

cau

sew

ay to

be

deve

lope

d fis

h po

rt fa

cilit

ies

(3)

Fig.

17.

19

Sta.

Cru

z Fi

sh P

ort

(3)

(2)

(1)

Page 6: Fig. 17.15 Calabanga Fish Port · 2011. 1. 26. · Fig. 17.16 Pasacao Fish Port (3) (2) (1) A-253 Appendix 17 Present condition of causeway (1) Proposed back up area for fish port

A-256

Appendix 17

Fi

sh L

andi

ng F

acili

ty to

be

reha

b. (1

)

Tem

pora

ry M

arke

t Hal

l to

be r

ehab

. (2)

A

cces

s Roa

d (3

)

Fig.

17.2

0 P

anab

o Fi

sh P

ort

(3)

(2)

(1)

Page 7: Fig. 17.15 Calabanga Fish Port · 2011. 1. 26. · Fig. 17.16 Pasacao Fish Port (3) (2) (1) A-253 Appendix 17 Present condition of causeway (1) Proposed back up area for fish port

A-257

Appendix 17

Pr

esen

t con

ditio

n of

new

Jet

ty (1

)

Exi

stin

g Sh

oe L

ine

area

(2)

Fig.

17.

21

Mat

i Fis

h Po

rt

(2)

(1)

Page 8: Fig. 17.15 Calabanga Fish Port · 2011. 1. 26. · Fig. 17.16 Pasacao Fish Port (3) (2) (1) A-253 Appendix 17 Present condition of causeway (1) Proposed back up area for fish port

A-258

Appendix 18

App

endi

x 18

. PD

M

PR

OJE

CT

TITL

E : N

atio

nwid

e Fi

sh P

ort P

roje

ct (P

acka

ge II

I)TA

RG

ET G

RO

UP

: Fish

por

t use

rs (f

isher

s, fis

h br

oker

s/w

hole

sale

rs/tr

ader

s,fish

pro

ceso

rs, e

tc.)

DA

TE :

15 Ju

ne 2

010

PER

IOD

: 20

12 -

2018

TAR

GET

AR

EA :

6 R

egio

nal F

ish P

orts

(Ilo

ilo, S

ual,

Luce

na, C

amal

igan

, Dav

ao. B

islig

) and

V

ERSI

ON

: 00

1-N

FPP(

III)

5

Mun

icip

al F

ish P

orts

(Con

cepc

ion,

Sub

ic, A

timon

an, C

alab

anga

, Sta

. Cru

z)

NA

RR

ATI

VE

SUM

MA

RY

IND

ICA

TOR

SM

EAN

S O

F V

ERIF

ICA

TIO

NIM

PORT

AN

T A

SSU

MPT

ION

S<

OV

ERA

LL G

OA

L >

Fish

ery-

rela

ted

busin

ess a

nd j

ob o

ppor

tuni

ties a

re c

reat

ed in

and

arou

nd th

e fis

h po

rts.

1. N

umbe

r of b

usin

ess e

nter

prise

s est

ablsi

hed

2. N

umbe

r of w

orke

rs in

and

aro

und

fish

ports

- List

of f

isher

y-re

late

d en

terp

rises

regi

ster

ed to

PFD

A a

nd L

GU

- Int

ervi

ew to

por

t use

rs<

PRO

JEC

T PU

RPO

SE >

Fish

es a

re e

ffect

ivel

y ut

ilize

d w

ith th

e in

crea

se o

f val

ue-a

dded

prod

ucts

and

redu

ctio

n of

pos

thar

vest

loss

.1.

Exp

ort v

alue

of f

ish p

roce

ssed

pro

duct

s2.

Des

tinat

ions

of e

xpor

t of f

ish p

roce

ssed

pro

duct

s3.

Ave

rage

who

lesa

le p

rice

of fr

esh

fsh

- Rec

ord

of e

xpor

t by

each

fish

pro

cess

or-

Stat

istic

al re

cord

at r

egio

nal f

ish p

orts

- On-

site

surv

ey o

f fish

pric

e at

mun

icip

alfis

h po

rts (i

n D

ecem

ber)

No

econ

omic

cris

is is

happ

ened

.

< O

UTP

UTS

>W

ith th

e im

prov

emen

t and

mod

erni

zatio

n of

faci

litie

s and

serv

ices

of f

ish p

orts

, th

e fo

llow

ing

outp

uts a

re o

btai

ned.

Fish

ery

reso

urce

s are

wel

l mai

ntai

ned

atcu

rren

t lev

el.

1. F

ishin

g bo

ats a

re m

ore

smoo

thly

moo

red

for u

nloa

ding

fish

at th

e la

ndin

g w

harf/

pier

.1.

Wai

ting

time

for m

oorin

g of

fish

ing

boat

s at p

eak

mon

th -

On-

site

surv

ey re

cord

at f

ish p

orts

(at

peak

mon

th)

2. M

ore

fish

are

unlo

aded

and

dist

ribut

ed fr

om p

roje

ct fi

shpo

rts.

2. F

ish u

nloa

ding

vol

ume

by sp

ecie

s- S

tatis

tical

reco

rd a

t reg

iona

l fish

por

ts- O

n-sit

e su

rvey

reco

rd a

t mun

icip

al fi

sh

3. M

ore

fishi

n g b

oats

use

the

proj

ect f

ish p

orts

.3.

Ave

rage

num

ber o

f fish

ing

boat

ent

ries

- Sta

tistic

al re

cord

at r

egio

nal f

ish p

orts

4. M

ore

ice

is pr

oduc

ed a

t Ilo

ilo, S

ual,

Cam

alig

an a

nd B

islig

FPC

s and

dist

ribut

ed to

the

mun

icip

al fi

sh p

orts

.4-

1. A

vera

ge d

aily

ice

prod

uctio

n vo

lum

e4-

2. A

vera

ge d

aily

ice

volu

me

dist

ribut

ed to

the

mun

icip

al fi

sh p

orts

- Sta

tistic

al re

cord

at r

egio

nal f

ish p

orts

5. P

roje

ct fi

sh p

ort f

acili

ties f

or le

ase

are

fully

use

d.5.

Lea

sing

rate

of m

arke

t hal

ls (b

ays)

, col

d/ch

illed

stor

a ge

room

s, H

AC

CP

fish

proc

essin

g un

its,

- Ope

ratio

nall

reco

rd a

t reg

iona

l fish

por

tsan

d m

unic

ipal

fish

por

ts6.

Fin

anci

al st

atus

of p

roje

ct fi

sh p

orts

are

impr

oved

.6.

Inco

me

and

expe

nditu

re o

f fish

por

ts- A

nnua

l fin

anci

al re

ports

of e

ach

fish

port

<

AC

TIV

ITIE

S >

1. S

elec

tion

of C

onsu

ltant

for E

ngin

eerin

g Se

rvic

es2.

Rev

iew

of F

/S a

nd D

etai

led

desig

n of

the

proj

ect

1. R

ehab

ilita

tion

and

cons

truct

ion

of 6

regi

onal

fish

ports

(Ilo

ilo, S

ual,

Luce

na, C

amal

igan

, Dav

ao,

[Phi

lippi

ne si

de]

1. L

and

acqu

isitio

n an

d sit

e cl

eara

nce

3. P

repa

ratio

n an

d m

anag

emen

t of t

ende

r for

sele

ctio

n of

cons

truct

ors/

supl

iers

4. S

u per

visio

n of

con

stru

ctio

n an

d pr

ocur

emen

t wor

k

2. R

ehab

ilita

tion

and

cons

truct

ion

of 5

mun

icip

al fi

shpo

rts (C

once

pcio

n, S

ubic

, Atim

onan

, Cal

aban

ga,

Sta.

Cru

z)

2. C

lear

ance

of a

ll ta

xes i

mpo

sed

in th

ePh

ilipp

ines

.

5. O

rient

atio

n fo

r ope

ratio

n an

d m

aint

enan

ce o

f pro

ject

faci

litie

3. E

ngin

eerin

g Se

rvic

es6.

Tec

hnic

al A

ssist

ance

(T/A

)4.

Des

patc

hmen

t of E

xper

ts6-

1 Pr

oof t

est f

or fi

sh p

roce

ssed

pro

duct

s for

loca

l mar

kets

4-1

Fish

Por

t Man

agem

ent 2

4 P/

M6-

2 Im

prov

emen

t of H

AC

CP

plan

ning

and

impl

emen

tatio

n4-

2 F

ish P

osth

arve

st T

echn

olog

y 20

P/M

6-3

Esta

blish

men

t of f

resh

fish

insp

ectio

n &

qua

lity

cont

rol s

yst4

-3 F

ish M

arke

ting

20 P

/M<

PREC

ON

DIT

ION

S >

6-4

Esta

blish

men

t of m

arke

t pric

e in

form

atio

n ne

twor

k sy

ste m

4-4

HA

CC

P/Q

ualit

y Co

ntro

l 20

P/M

6-5

Dem

onst

ratio

n to

priv

ate

ente

rpris

es fo

r fish

por

t util

izat

ion4

.5 P

ublic

aw

aren

ess/

Exte

nsio

n 20

P/M

6-6

Publ

ic a

war

enes

s for

diff

eren

ciat

ion

of fi

sh tr

eate

d at

fish

po5

. Cap

acity

Build

ing

of P

FDA

staf

f in

Japa

n 16

P/M

6. P

roje

ct M

anag

emen

t Offi

ce (P

MO

)

< IN

PUTS

>

Loan

Agr

eem

ent (

L/A

) is c

oncl

uded

as

sche

dule

d be

twee

n JI

CA

and

GO

P.

6-7

Gui

danc

e an

d as

sista

nce

for b

ette

r fish

por

t ope

ratio

n an

dm

anag

emen

t

3. O

bten

sion

of a

ll ne

cess

ary

perm

issio

nsfo

r im

plem

enta

tion

of th

e Pr

ojec

t.4.

Arr

ange

men

t of c

ount

er-b

udge

t (15

% o

fto

tal p

roje

ct c

ost)

Prop

osed

tech

nica

l ass

istan

ce (T

/A) i

sex

tend

ed a

s sch

edul

e.

Page 9: Fig. 17.15 Calabanga Fish Port · 2011. 1. 26. · Fig. 17.16 Pasacao Fish Port (3) (2) (1) A-253 Appendix 17 Present condition of causeway (1) Proposed back up area for fish port

A-259

Appendix 18

App

endi

x 19

. Rec

omm

ende

d A

ctio

n Pl

an

In

ord

er to

ach

ieve

sust

aina

ble

oper

atio

ns fo

r ea

ch fi

sh p

ort t

he fo

llow

ing

esse

ntia

l con

ditio

nssh

ould

be

fully

con

side

red:

(As p

er th

e FR

Cha

p 20

con

clus

ion

& R

ecom

men

datio

ns, P

age

2-17

7)R

ecom

men

ded

Act

ion

plan

for

Impl

emen

ting

agen

cyO

utpu

t (dr

aft)

Whe

n(r

ecom

men

ded

tim

ing)

1)Po

rt m

anag

emen

t sho

uld

serio

usly

con

sider

incr

easin

g th

e m

arke

t cha

rges

and

buy

er/s

elle

r fee

s bas

ed o

n1%

of t

he v

alue

of t

he v

olum

e of

fish

land

ed a

t the

fish

por

t. Th

e pr

evai

ling

fees

shou

ld b

e in

crem

enta

llyin

crea

sed

annu

ally

unt

il th

e re

com

men

ded

rate

s are

atta

ined

by

2025

at t

he la

test

;

(1) H

earin

g an

d di

scus

sions

will

be

cond

ucte

d fo

r the

por

t use

rs a

nd st

akeh

olde

rs b

efor

e an

d af

ter

com

men

cem

ent o

f the

impl

emen

tatio

n (c

onst

ruct

ion

wor

ks) s

tarte

d.(2

) Im

prov

emen

t of t

he fi

sh p

ort f

acili

ties a

nd se

rvic

es th

roug

h im

plem

enta

tion

of th

e pr

ojec

t.(3

) Im

prov

emen

t of t

he fi

sh q

ualit

y (fr

eshn

ess,

hygi

enic

con

ditio

ns, l

abor

ator

y te

stin

g, in

clud

ing

certi

ficat

ion

on th

e qu

ality

), se

rvic

es, r

eput

atio

n on

the

FPC

.(4

) Adv

ertis

ing

cam

paig

n/ p

ublic

rela

tions

on

the

impr

oved

faci

litie

s and

serv

ices

of F

P.(5

) Arr

ange

men

t for

por

t cha

rge/

rate

incr

ease

, prio

r to

the

com

plet

ion

of th

e pr

ojec

t fac

ilitie

s.(6

) Pro

visio

n of

rele

vant

rule

s and

regu

latio

ns to

ach

ieve

succ

eedi

ng a

nnua

l inc

reas

e of

cha

rge

rate

to a

chie

veth

e ta

rget

rate

of 1

% o

f fish

val

ue b

y th

e ye

ar 2

025

whi

ch w

ill b

e in

clud

ing

the

pric

e in

flatio

n.

*let

ter o

f int

ensio

n of

the

user

s*M

OU

/MO

A*R

ecor

d of

min

utes

of

disc

ussio

n*R

ecor

d of

adve

rtise

men

t

*Oct

201

0

*201

5*2

015

and

afte

r*2

015

and

afte

r

2)Fi

sh la

ndin

g fe

es a

nd tr

anss

hipm

ent f

ees m

ay b

e re

tain

ed a

t cur

rent

rate

s but

it is

reco

mm

ende

d th

at th

ese

be g

radu

ally

incr

ease

d at

reas

onab

le ra

tes m

utua

lly a

ccep

tabl

e to

the

port

man

agem

ent a

nd fi

shpr

oduc

ers.

This

is ju

stifi

able

bec

ause

of t

he su

bsta

ntia

l im

prov

emen

ts to

mad

e fo

r dev

elop

men

t of

esse

ntia

l por

t fac

ilitie

s for

val

ue a

ddin

g of

fish

pro

duct

s;

Sam

e as

abo

ve c

olum

n Sa

me

as a

bove

col

umn

Sam

e as

abov

e co

lum

n

3)Fo

r Ilo

ilo F

PC, e

lect

rical

cha

rge

mus

t be

redu

ced

by a

dopt

ing

sola

r pow

er g

ener

atio

n sy

stem

from

the

curr

ent r

ate

of P

hP11

.30/

kwh

to P

hp 8

.40/

kwh

to su

stai

n th

e op

erat

ion

of th

e re

frig

erat

ion

faci

litie

sw

hich

is th

e m

ajor

sour

ce o

f rev

enue

of t

he F

PC. T

his w

ill in

turn

mor

e en

trepr

eneu

rs to

relo

cate

to Il

oilo

FPC

bec

ause

of t

he lo

wer

pow

er ra

tes.

Base

d on

key

info

rman

ts, m

any

busin

ess h

ad to

relo

cate

out

side

Iloilo

City

to a

vail

of th

e lo

wer

pow

er c

ost;

1) T

he n

egot

iatio

n an

d co

nfirm

atio

n be

twee

n lo

cal p

ower

com

pany

(PEC

O) a

nd IF

PC w

ere

alre

ady

done

and

conf

irmat

ion

was

mad

e th

orou

gh th

e co

rres

pond

ence

with

PEC

O o

n M

arch

25,

201

0.2)

It is

ant

icip

ated

that

by

mea

ns o

f the

inte

rnat

iona

l sol

ar p

anel

pro

duce

rs e

ffort,

the

pric

e of

sola

r pan

els i

sdr

astic

ally

redu

cing

. Thi

s situ

atio

n is

enco

urag

ing

the

posit

ion

of so

lar p

ower

gen

erat

ion

syst

em.

* Le

tter o

f PEC

O o

nM

arch

25,

201

0*M

OA

*Pre

pare

d

*1st

Qtr.

Of

2012

4)Fo

r Sua

l FPC

, the

pro

duct

s of m

aric

ultu

re fi

sh-c

age

shou

ld b

e ha

ndle

d at

SFP

C w

ith fi

sh u

nloa

ding

rate

of P

eso

6.00

/tub

inst

ead

of p

rese

nt P

eso

2.80

/tub.

Clo

se c

oord

inat

ion

betw

een

priv

ate

sect

or, L

GU

and

PFD

A is

indi

spen

sabl

e.

1) P

FDA

will

con

duct

hea

ring

and

disc

ussio

n w

ith fi

sh c

age

oper

ator

s (po

rt us

ers)

and

Sua

l LG

U.

2) In

ord

er to

pro

mot

e th

e us

ers,

the

proj

ect c

ompo

nent

s, im

prov

emen

t of p

ort f

unct

ions

and

serv

ices

thro

ugh

the

proj

ect w

ill b

e ex

plai

ned

to th

e us

ers

3) R

evise

the

LGU

fish

por

t rel

ated

ord

inan

ce to

exp

edite

the

inco

min

g us

ers.

*let

ter o

f int

ensio

n of

the

user

s*M

OU

/MO

A*R

ecor

d of

min

utes

of

disc

ussio

n*R

ecor

d of

adve

rtise

men

t

*Oct

201

0*M

id 2

015

*201

5 an

daf

ter

*201

5 an

daf

ter

*201

65)

In B

islig

FPC

, Cam

alig

an F

PC, a

nd Il

oilo

FPC

, por

t man

agem

ent s

houl

d de

velo

p an

d im

plem

ent a

nag

gres

sive

mar

ketin

g pl

an/s

trate

gy to

ent

ice

pote

ntia

l ent

repr

eneu

rs to

relo

cate

and

inve

st in

thes

e po

rtco

mpl

exes

. Effe

ctiv

e m

arke

ting

of th

e po

rt fa

cilit

ies i

nclu

de th

e re

ntin

g ou

t raw

land

s tha

t is a

vaila

ble

for

com

mer

cial

use

to g

ener

ate

the

need

ed re

venu

es to

sust

ain

the

oper

atio

n of

the

com

plex

es;

1) M

arke

ting

plan

to p

rom

ote

FPC

use

rs a

nd p

roce

ssor

s.2)

Mar

ket s

urve

y3)

Clo

se c

omm

unic

atio

n w

ith p

oten

tial u

sers

.4)

App

oint

men

t of m

arke

ting

offic

er5)

Est

ablis

hmen

t of r

ules

and

bud

get o

n pr

omot

ion

activ

ity in

PFD

A

*Mar

ketin

g pl

an*L

ist o

f pot

entia

l use

rs*2

012

*201

0

6)Te

chni

cal

assis

tanc

eon

port

man

agem

ent

isde

emed

criti

cal

for

stre

ngth

enin

gth

eca

paci

tyof

PFD

Ast

affs

and

conc

erne

dag

enci

essu

chas

BFA

Rin

oper

atin

g,m

aint

aini

ngan

dm

anag

ing

the

prop

osed

valu

e-ad

ding

and

labo

rato

ryfa

cilit

ies.

Inth

isre

gard

,ea

chpo

rtsh

ould

(prio

rto

com

men

cem

ent

ofPr

ojec

top

erat

ion)

orga

nize

the

staf

f/per

sonn

elto

betra

ined

unde

rth

ete

chni

cal

assis

tanc

e.A

syst

eman

dpr

ogra

mof

ince

ntiv

esan

dre

war

d(e

.g.,

prom

otio

nan

dpr

ovid

ing

com

petit

ive

sala

ries)

mus

tbe

deve

lope

dto

mai

ntai

nth

ose

who

have

been

train

edfr

omle

avin

gth

eco

mpl

exto

seek

bette

rop

portu

nitie

s.Th

issy

stem

of i

ncen

tives

/rew

ards

mus

t be

com

petit

ive

to th

e ex

tent

pos

sible

; and

*As f

or c

apac

ity b

uild

ing

and

tech

nolo

gy tr

ansf

er th

roug

h T/

A, r

efer

to re

leva

nt se

ctio

ns o

f FR

*PFD

A w

ill e

stab

lish

the

rew

ard

syst

em fo

r tho

se w

ho h

ave

skill

s kno

wle

dge

expe

rienc

e an

d tit

les d

epen

d on

the

nece

ssity

for t

he fi

sh p

ort o

pera

tion

man

agem

ent a

nd m

aint

enan

ce.

*201

4

7)A

sth

ein

vest

men

tson

valu

e-ad

ding

faci

litie

sto

bein

stal

led

for

the

regi

onal

fish

ports

are

cons

ider

ably

high

,and

cons

ider

ing

that

the

faci

litie

swill

beth

em

ajor

ofth

eco

mpl

exes

,por

tman

agem

ents

houl

dca

rry

out

O&

Min

clud

ing

mai

nten

ance

whe

neve

rne

cess

ary

onre

gula

rba

sis.

Brea

kdow

nsbr

ough

tab

out

byin

suffi

cien

tfun

dsan

dla

teac

tion

will

certa

inly

bede

trim

enta

lto

the

sust

aina

bilit

yof

oper

atio

nsdu

eto

loss

inre

venu

eac

crui

ngfr

omth

eno

nop

erat

ion

ofth

efa

cilit

ies.

This

will

adve

rsel

yaf

fect

port

finan

cial

perf

orm

ance

. The

fund

s for

rene

wal

of d

epre

ciat

ed m

achi

nery

/faci

lity

will

also

be

requ

ired

* Es

tabl

ishm

ent o

f rul

es a

nd g

uide

lines

on

the

mai

nten

ance

of t

he m

achi

nerie

s and

faci

litie

s.*

Prov

ision

of i

nter

nal b

udge

t allo

catio

n sy

stem

of P

FDA

* Es

tabl

ishm

ent o

f cor

pora

te p

rofit

rese

rvat

ion

syst

em a

nd ru

les.

*Bud

get a

lloca

tion

syst

em*e

stab

lishm

ent o

f rul

esan

d re

gula

tion

*Dra

ft 20

12,

take

effe

ct20

16*D

raft

2012

,ta

ke e

ffect

2016

8)Th

ees

tabl

ishm

ento

fPM

O(P

roje

ctM

anag

emen

tOffi

ce)o

fPFD

Ais

esse

ntia

lfor

the

impl

emen

tatio

nof

the

Proj

ect.

* PF

DA

will

est

ablis

h an

d or

gani

ze P

MO

(Pro

ject

Man

agem

ent O

ffice

) det

ache

d di

rect

ly to

the

Offi

ce o

fG

M (G

ener

al M

anag

er)

*The

rele

vant

bud

get f

or th

e PM

O w

ill b

e se

cure

d pr

ior t

o pr

ojec

t im

plem

enta

tion

*Bud

get a

rran

gem

ent

*Mid

201

3

Appendix 19

Page 10: Fig. 17.15 Calabanga Fish Port · 2011. 1. 26. · Fig. 17.16 Pasacao Fish Port (3) (2) (1) A-253 Appendix 17 Present condition of causeway (1) Proposed back up area for fish port

Appendix 20

A-260

Appendix 20. Details of T/A Component

Table20. 1 Details of T/ A Component (Fish Port management) Project Technical Assistance for Nationwide Fish Port Project (III) T/A Component Fish Port Management (Soft-component of Japanese Yen Loan) Period 2 years(April 2016 – March 2018) Target Area / Beneficiary Existing five (5) regional fish ports (Iloilo, Sual, Lucena, Camaligan and Davao)

and Bislig fish port/ PFDA, fish cage operators, boat operators, and fish processors

Executing Agency PFDA Cooperating Agency Background and Objectives: Technical assistance (T/ A) aims for the improvement of the operation and maintenance capacity of the existing five (5) regional fish ports (Iloilo, Sual, Lucena, Camaligan and Davao) and the elaboration will be reflected to the Bislig fish port, newly construction. The super goal of the T/ A is that PFDA fish ports are soundly operation & managed, and it will be achieved not only improvement and renovation of facilities but also enhancement of quality of fish port service. To achieve the super goal of the T/A, objective of this component is to improve fish port operation & maintenance. As a result of implementation of this component, the facilities improved and renovated in the project will be utilized efficiently. Project Purpose Super Goal: Improvement of fish port operation & management Project Purpose: 1. Improvement of port operation and maintenance system 2. Promotion for fish port utilization

Output: 1. Fish port operation and maintenance system will be

established, revised, accepted by the stakeholders and implemented (including rues & regulations, port utilization charge/ fees, and organization structures)

2. Project facilities are effectively utilized as projected with increase of number of lessees.

Year Activities Output 1 2 3 4

1. Improvement of port operation and maintenance systems

1.1 Organization structures 1.2 Fish port operation & management

system 1.3 Port facility maintenance system

1) Operational rules & regulations 2) Port charge/fee schedule, 3) Stakeholders workshop report 4) Maintenance schedule 5) Organizational diagram

---------

---

---

--------- --- -----

--

2. Assistance in promotion for fish port utilization

2.1 Demonstrate and extend the merits to use the modernized market hall to fish producers and traders

2.2 Encourage fish cage operators to use fish ports

2.3 Encourage boat operators to use fish ports2.4 Encourage fish processors to use fish

ports

1) Facilities utilization ratio to operation plan

2) Number and scale of fishing boats entries

3) Number of fish processors (lessees)

4) Fish unloading & handling volume

5) Boat repair record

--

--

--

--

--

Input 【Japanese side】 Personnel: Expert of Fish Port Operation & Management (24 P/M) 【Philippine side】 Personnel: Port Managers (Iloilo, Sual and Lucena) Facilities & Equipment to be provided: Office space and office equipment Points to be considered • To promote understanding of operation and management of fish port, OJT will be conducted. • The activities of this component will be programmed with the schedule of the construction works for

coordination to ensure successful implementation.

Page 11: Fig. 17.15 Calabanga Fish Port · 2011. 1. 26. · Fig. 17.16 Pasacao Fish Port (3) (2) (1) A-253 Appendix 17 Present condition of causeway (1) Proposed back up area for fish port

Appendix 20

A-261

Table 20.2 Details of T/ A Component (Development & Extension of Fish Processing Technology) Project Technical Assistance for Nationwide Fish Port Project (III) T/A Component Development & Extension of Fish Processing Technology Period 2 years(April 2011 – March 2013) Target Area / Beneficiary Iloilo, Lucena, Sual /Existing Fish Processors Executing Agency PFDA Cooperating Agency BFAR Background and Objectives Dominant fish species unloaded are consisted of small pelagics (sardines, juvenile of eastern little tuna, etc.) in Iloilo and Lucena areas and skipjack in Sual area (west coast of Luzon Island). The catch volume of these species largely fluctuates by seasons. Certain volume of fish cannot be treated and/or sold causing the drop of fish freshness, and some portion of these surplus fish are reported to be disposed in some ports. Furthermore, no fish processing methods other than traditional methods such as drying, salting and smoking. In these points of view, the most of postharvest loss (both physical and economic) might be caused in small pelagics and skipjack having large volume of catch. The proposed technical assistance is aimed to develop and extend new fish processing technologies as one of the measures for effective utilization of the abundantly caught fishes. Project Purpose Super Goal With development of new fish processed products, the abundantly caught fishes (sardine, eastern little tuna, and skipjack) are effectively utilized. Project Purpose The fish processed products which are acceptable by local markets are developed.

Output 1. The consumer’s demand and taste for fish processed

products in the target areas are identified. 2. At least 3 kinds of fish processed products

acceptable by local markets are developed. 3. Small and medium-scale fish processors in target

areas tackle on processing of the developed products.

Year Activities Output 1 2 3 4

1. Market research 1.1 Demand survey for skipjack products in the

northern Luzon and Manila 1.2 Demand survey for products of small pelagics in

Iloilo and Manila 2. Development of new fish processed products

2.1 Experimental fish processing (skipjack, small pelagics)

2.2 Quality and sanitary inspection of products 2.3 Sales promotion of products (Experimental sales)

3. Enlightening and extension of processing techniques to local fish processors 3.1 Extension of processing technique to local fish

processors 3.2 Enlightening to consumers

Survey report Survey report Recipe for fish processing Inspection record Label, package Extension record, processed volume HP, pamphlets

-- --

--

-- --

- - - ---- ----

Input 【Japanese side】 Personnel: Fish processing expert (20 p/m), Equipment: Fish processing equipment (US$30,000) 【Philippine side】 Personnel: PFDA: Port managers (3), Officer in charge of marketing (3) NFRDI/BFAR: Researcher on fish processing (1) Facilities: Existing fish port facilities (for fish processing), BFAR’s fish processing/inspection laboratories, Office space with office equipment Points to be considered 1. Demand survey is conducted to identify the distribution status of both fresh fish and processed products of the

target species and the taste of local consumers by questionnaires, interview and observation. 2. Experimental fish processing and inspection are conducted by using the existing BFAR’s fish processing

laboratory (Region-V) and fish inspection laboratory in Manila. However, it is necessary to procure smoking kiln, vacuum packer and cooking equipments by the T/A. These equipments are used not only in the existing BFAR’s laboratories but also in the target fish ports (for demonstration and extension purpose).

3. As for the selection of candidates for expert, as the scope of works cover both fish processing technology and sales promotion (enlightening and extension), two experts in the respective field (fish processing in the 1st year and fish marketing/extension in the 2nd year) had better be procured.

Page 12: Fig. 17.15 Calabanga Fish Port · 2011. 1. 26. · Fig. 17.16 Pasacao Fish Port (3) (2) (1) A-253 Appendix 17 Present condition of causeway (1) Proposed back up area for fish port

Appendix 20

A-262

Table 20.3 Details of T/ A Component (Improvement of Fresh Fish Quality) Project Technical Assistance for Nationwide Fish Port Project (III) T/A Component Improvement of Fresh Fish Quality Period 3 years(April 2014 – March 2017) Target Area / Beneficiary Iloilo, Lucena, Davao / Boat Operators, Fish Brokers & Buyers Executing Agency PFDA Cooperating Agency BFAR Background and Objectives The market halls inside the PFDA’s regional fish ports have a core role as regional fish wholesale market, and about 60 – 90 metric tons of fishes are dealt in IFPC and LFPC. With the Yen-loan project, the market halls are to be totally rehabilitated and expanded so as to ensure the hygienic environment and smooth fish distribution. On the other hand, as for the qualitative improvement of fishes, it is necessary to expedite the improvement of services (activities) such as improvement of fish handling/trading methods (use of sufficient water and ice, better quality of fish containers, etc.), control of entry of persons not directly related to the market hall, control of low quality fish through sensory inspection, provision of price information needed by stakeholders, etc. The purpose of the proposed T/A is to improve the services related to fish handling and trading, fish quality inspection and assurance, differentiation between fishes dealt in the target fish ports and those dealt outside fish ports (branding), so as to improve value of fishes. Project Purpose Super Goal The status and popularity of target fish ports are improved and more fishes are dealt at the market halls of target fish ports. Project Purpose Quality and value of fishes dealt at the market halls of target fish ports are increased.

Output 1. Fish handling and trading are adequately controlled in the

market halls of target fish ports based on GMP/SSOP. 2. Fish price information services are provided based on the

needs of stakeholders. 3. Fish quality assurance system (standards, operational rules

and regulations, organization) is established. 4. Illegally caught and low quality fishes are not handled in

the market halls. 5. At least 10% of fish handling volume in the market halls

are quality-assured by label, etc. Year Activities Output

1 2 3 4 1. Improvement of fresh fish handling and trading

1.1 Review and amendment of GMP/SSOP process 1.2 Introduction of ID system to stakeholders 1.3 OJT on GMP/SSOP to PFDA personnel

2. Introduction and extension of market price information services 2.1 Needs assessment of port users on price

information 2.2 Designing of price information service system 2.3 Experimental introduction to target fish ports

3. Establishment of fish quality assurance system (QA) 3.1 Preparation of operational guidelines for fresh fish

inspection and assurance 3.2 OJT of inspectors on QA system

4. Extension and enlightening of quality QA system 4.1 Preparation of tools for demonstration and

advertisement 4.2 Regional branding of special fishery products

Rev. GMP/SSOP ID goods (cap, etc.)Training record Assessment report Guideline, drawing Experiment record Guideline Training record HP, Posters Volume of branded fish

-- -- -- --

---- ---- ----

--

---

---- -- ----

Input 【Japanese side】 Personnel: Fish marketing expert (20 p/m), Information service/enlightening & extension expert (20 p/m) Equipment: Quality inspection & assurance equipment (Thermometer, labeling machine, etc.: US$10,000) 【Philippine side】 Personnel: PFDA: Port managers (2), Harbor & Market Operation Chiefs (2), Officers in charge of QA (2) Facilities: Existing fish ports (market halls), office space and office equipment Points to be considered 1. The proposed T/A should be implemented as a yen-loan attached T/A, in combination with other T/A (improvement of quality of fish processed products) having similar objectives, scopes and periods, so as to obtain the multiplier effects and the work effectiveness.

Page 13: Fig. 17.15 Calabanga Fish Port · 2011. 1. 26. · Fig. 17.16 Pasacao Fish Port (3) (2) (1) A-253 Appendix 17 Present condition of causeway (1) Proposed back up area for fish port

Appendix 20

A-263

Table 20.4 Details of T/ A Component (Development and Extension of HACCP, Quality Control) Project Technical Assistance for Nationwide Fish Port Project (III) T/A Component Development and Extension of HACCP, Quality Control Period 3 years(April 2014 – March 2017) Target Area / Beneficiary Iloilo, Davao, Camaligan, Sual FPC /Existing Fish quality control laboratory Executing Agency PFDA Cooperating Agency BFAR Background and Objectives The fisheries food processing industry has experienced a strong expansion in terms of quantitative growth, product diversification and the permanent incorporation of new and sophisticated technologies. Nonetheless, prevention control system has not developed at the same rate and its structure still focuses upon the final points of the production chain and/or those establishments that constitute the final selling point. Thus, it is necessary to develop a more prevention focused control system so that food safety is guaranteed from that actively involves the relevant production and commercial sectors as well as consumers. The current analytical capacity does not enable an adequate control in the areas of fisheries sector including fish farming, which increasingly use more and antibiotics, hormones and other chemical components that require analytical skills to detect the residues they leave behind. The major problems faced by the program related in the first is the need to develop a new approach as regards the management of the program, and secondly, to the need to strengthen the current analytical capacities in the context of the emergence of a series of new contaminants. At the same time, there is a need to update and improve the analytical response capacity (that is, the process that begins with the taking of samples on the site and ends with the final analysis, including transport) as regards microbiological contaminants associated to emerging and reemerging diseases. In this program, quality of processed fish products are aimed to be improve, and management of fish ports will have stabilized which resulting from stable operation of fish processing factories operated inside of ports (IFPC, DFPC, CFPC and SFPC) and beyond. Project Purpose Super Goal Safety of fisheries processing products in Philippines market is improved and security level of Philippines customer is increased Project Purpose Philippines fisheries processing Food Safety Program is strengthened.

Output 1. Competency of food safety inspectors of BFAR, is improved and their level of inspection and supervision is increased. 2. Competency of PFDA staffs in regional fish port (IFPC, DFPC, CFPC and SFPC) will formulate HACCP program in the port and their level of inspection and supervision is strengthened. 3. Capability of food analysis at target laboratories is strengthened 4. The regional small and medium scale fish processing companies will have access to obtain information for HACCP Planning to encourage their product to export quality products.

Year Activities Output 1 2 3 4

1. Review of fish processed procedure 1.1 Review the current GMP/SSOP and the current fish handling procedures in fish processed facilities in IFPC, DFPC, CFPC and SFPC regions.

Field survey reports --

1.2 Review the current monitoring procedure in competent monitoring authority relating to HACCP system

HACCP audit report

-- -

2. Competency of food safety inspectors

Page 14: Fig. 17.15 Calabanga Fish Port · 2011. 1. 26. · Fig. 17.16 Pasacao Fish Port (3) (2) (1) A-253 Appendix 17 Present condition of causeway (1) Proposed back up area for fish port

Appendix 20

A-264

2.1 Conduct HACCP basic and inspection trainings for food safety inspectors. 2.2 Develop HACCP models for some selected foods and promote their related enterprises. 2.3 Instruct trainees on the method of formulation of inspection plan and monitor its programs.

Actual plan for HACCP accreditation Model plan of HACCP program

- -- ---- -----

3. Strengthen of Food analysis laboratory capability, relating to HACCP(DFPC, CFPC,IFPC)

SOP for current laboratory analysis

3.1 Conduct training for HACCP laboratory analysis methods 3.2 Plan and implement validation plan for Laboratory work. 3.3 Training on analytical equipments 3.3 Formalize the analytical methods

HACCP laboratory methods

---- -- ---- -----

4. Formulation of monitoring and sampling

--

4.1 Determination of products to be sampled 4.2 Determination of sampling numbers and handling methods 4.3 Develop procedures and methods for sample handling

Sampling methods for HACCP

-- ---

Input 【Japanese side】 HACCP Specialist (20 M/M) Equipment for laboratory work (200,000 US$) Glassware, chemical equipments, LC/MS, Microscope, computer, etc. 【Philippine side】 Counterpart personnel from Philippine side PFDA port managers (IFPC, DFPC, CFPC and SFPC) PFDA HACCP staff (IFPC, DFPC, CFPC and SFPC) BFAR laboratory staff (Chemical and microbiology analysis) PFDA Officers in charge of quality assurance (IFPC, DFPC, CFPC and SFPC) Points to be considered ・ Good manufacturing practice / Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures will be precondition for the

implementation of HACCP program, and should be established. ・ HACCP program shall be prepared according to methods of Philippine’s competence agency (BFAR) ・ Laboratories conduct analyses are planed to implement in the existing laboratories own by BFAR. However,

laboratory facilities in fish ports will be use with completion of its construction by the Project ・ Japanese specialist should prepare feedback system or share the information relating HACCP requirements to

the Project. It is strongly requested to notifies the necessary information or changes of the HACCP requirement to construction for processing facilities in the fish port by the Project

・ Small and medium scale fish processing enterprise are interested to HACCP program and cooperate to training.

Page 15: Fig. 17.15 Calabanga Fish Port · 2011. 1. 26. · Fig. 17.16 Pasacao Fish Port (3) (2) (1) A-253 Appendix 17 Present condition of causeway (1) Proposed back up area for fish port

Appendix 21

A-265

Appendix 21. Project Cost Considering the Improvement/Construction of the Six Regional Fish Ports Only

Should the five (5) municipal fish ports be excluded from the scope of works, the Project will comprise only of the improvement/construction of the six (6) regional fish ports. Under this scenario, the project cost is estimated at Php. 5,082 billion.

Table 21.1 Project Cost (Regional Fish Ports Only)

Cost Item Amount (PHP million)

Share (%)

1 Project Costs 5,082 100 2 Foreign Portion (financed by JICA) 4,320 85 3 Local Portion (financed by GOP) *1 762 15 Note *1: The government of the Philippines (GOP) is burdened the commitment charge (PHP32 million) added to the above amount. Therefore defrayment of GOP is PHP 794 million.

Summary of the estimated project cost for the six (6) regional fish ports only is tabulated hereunder.

Table 21.2 Summary of Project Cost (Regional Fish Ports Only) UNIT: 1,000 PHP

(A) (D) Cost Considered (E) Contingency (F) Total CostTotal of Base Cost Price Escalation 8%

Project Component (including VAT) 7.1% per year 1.8% per year (D) = (A)+(B)+(C) (E) = (D) x Conti.(%) (F) = (D) + (E)1, Cost for Construction works and Equipment Supply1) Package 1 (Iloilo) 557,874 636,592 50,927 687,5192) Package 2 (Sual, Lucena and Camaligan) 690,786 784,990 62,799 847,7893) Package 3 (Davao and Bislig) 715,097 817,656 65,412 883,0694) Package 4 (Equipment Supply) 1,662,482 1,870,635 149,651 2,020,286

Sub-Total 1 3,626,239 4,109,872 328,790 4,438,6622, Consulting Cost1) Detail Design 187,304 187,304 0 187,3042) Construction Management 374,561 374,561 0 374,561

Sub-Total 2 561,865 561,865 0 561,8653, Sub-Total 3 (=Sub-Total 1 + 2) 4,188,105 4,671,738 328,790 5,000,5274, Others1) PFDA Administration Cost (PMO) 24,499 0 0 24,4992) Fish Port Management (T/ A) 37,050 0 0 37,0503) Land Accruement Expense (Bislig) 20,000 0 0 20,000

Sub-Total 4 81,549 0 0 81,5495, Total

Total Cost (=Sub-Total 3 +4 ) 4,269,653 4,671,738 328,790 5,082,076

Note 1: Total Local Cost will be 838 (million PHP) includes Loan Commitment Charge.

(1,000 PHP)JPY Equivalent

(1,000 JPY)Note 2: Loan Commitment Charge Japanese Yen Loan (85% of Total Cost) 4,319,765 8,443,278

= Total Cost x 0.85 x 0.1% x 7 years = 31,972 (1,000 PHP) Local Portion (15% of Total Cost) 762,311 -Note 3: 1US$=JPY90.520=PHP46. 312 Total 5,082,076 -Note 4: Abbreviation

PMO: Project Management Office T/ A: Technical Assistance

Note 5: Breakdown of the cost for PFDA administration Cost (PMO) is shown in the table 18.2.2.

188,764 294,869

Currency Portion

0 0

0 00 0

0 0

0 0188,764 294,869

0 00 0

188,764 294,869

44,884 57,67568,383 139,770

34,420 44,29741,077 53,126

(B) Price Escalation (C) Price Escalation(Local) (Foreign)

The disbursement schedule in case that the project is composed of only six (6) regional fish ports is shown in the following table.

Page 16: Fig. 17.15 Calabanga Fish Port · 2011. 1. 26. · Fig. 17.16 Pasacao Fish Port (3) (2) (1) A-253 Appendix 17 Present condition of causeway (1) Proposed back up area for fish port

Appendix 21

A-266

Table 21.3 Disbursement Schedule (Regional Fish Ports Only) Unit: 1,000 PHP

Local Foreign Total Local Foreign Total Local Foreign Total1 Base Cost of Package 1 83,681 474,193 557,874 0 0 0 0 0 0

Price Escalation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 Base Cost of Package 2 103,618 587,168 690,786 0 0 0 0 0 0

Price Escalation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 Base Cost of Package 3 107,265 607,833 715,097 0 0 0 0 0 0

Price Escalation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 Base Cost of Package 4 166,248 1,496,234 1,662,482 0 0 0 0 0 0

Price Escalation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0SUB-TOTAL (=1+2+3+4) 460,812 3,165,428 3,626,239 0 0 0 0 0 0

5 Consulting Cost for Detailed Design 65,556 121,748 187,304 32,778 60,874 93,652 32,778 60,874 93,6526 Consulting Cost for Construction Management 131,096 243,465 374,561 0 0 0 0 0 0

GRAND TOTAL (SUB-TOTAL + 5+6) 657,465 3,530,640 4,188,105 32,778 60,874 93,652 32,778 60,874 93,652

Base Cost (2010) 2,012 2,013

Unit: 1,000 PHP

Local Foreign Total Local Foreign Total Local Foreign Total Local Foreign Total27,894 158,064 185,958 27,894 158,064 185,958 27,894 158,064 185,958 83,681 474,193 557,8748,806 11,692 20,498 11,412 14,747 26,159 14,203 17,858 32,060 34,420 44,297 78,717

35,149 199,179 234,328 48,788 276,466 325,254 19,681 111,523 131,204 103,618 587,168 690,78611,097 14,733 25,830 19,960 25,794 45,754 10,021 12,600 22,620 41,077 53,126 94,20427,527 155,986 183,513 44,043 249,577 293,620 35,695 202,270 237,964 107,265 607,833 715,0978,690 11,538 20,228 18,019 23,285 41,304 18,174 22,852 41,027 44,884 57,675 102,559

55,416 498,745 554,161 55,416 498,745 554,161 55,416 498,745 554,161 249,372 1,413,109 1,662,48217,495 36,891 54,386 22,672 46,532 69,204 28,216 56,347 84,563 68,383 139,770 208,153192,074 1,086,827 1,278,901 248,203 1,293,211 1,541,414 209,299 1,080,259 1,289,557 732,700 3,377,172 4,109,872

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65,556 121,748 187,30443,699 81,155 124,854 43,699 81,155 124,854 43,699 81,155 124,854 131,096 243,465 374,561235,773 1,167,982 1,403,755 291,902 1,374,366 1,666,268 252,997 1,161,414 1,414,411 929,353 3,742,385 4,671,738

TOTAL2014 2015 2016

The summary of the estimated base cost for the six regional fish ports which are split into 3 packages is shown in the table below.

Table 21.4 Summary of Base Cost (Regional Fish Port Only)

Unit: 1,000 PHP

1 ILOILO 557,874 557,874 803,916 1,361,791SUAL 274,999 186,219 461,218LUCENA 268,099 47,438 315,537CAMALIGAN 147,688 219,252 366,940DAVAO 75,815 88,741 164,556BISLIG 639,283 316,915 956,198

TOTAL 1,963,758 1,963,758 1,662,482 3,626,239

2 690,786

3 715,097

(2) Total of Base Costfor Each Package

(3) Cost ofEquipment for Each

(4) Total of BareCost for Each SitePackage Regional Fish Port (1) Cost of

Construction for Each

The table hereunder shows the annual funding plan for each of the Package mentioned above.

Page 17: Fig. 17.15 Calabanga Fish Port · 2011. 1. 26. · Fig. 17.16 Pasacao Fish Port (3) (2) (1) A-253 Appendix 17 Present condition of causeway (1) Proposed back up area for fish port

Appendix 21

A-267

Loca

lFo

reig

nTo

tal

Loca

lFo

reig

nTo

tal

Loca

lFo

reig

nTo

tal

Loca

lFo

reig

nTo

tal

Loca

lFo

reig

nTo

tal

Loca

lFo

reig

nTo

tal

Loca

lFo

reig

nTo

tal

Iloilo

Base

Cos

t (Co

nstru

ctio

n W

orks

)74

,715

423,

387

498,

102

00

00

00

24,9

0514

1,12

916

6,03

424

,905

141,

129

166,

034

24,9

0514

1,12

916

6,03

474

,715

423,

387

498,

102

VA

T (1

2%)

8,96

650

,806

59,7

720

00

00

02,

989

16,9

3519

,924

2,98

916

,935

19,9

242,

989

16,9

3519

,924

8,96

650

,806

59,7

72Su

b-to

tal 1

83,6

8147

4,19

355

7,87

40

00

00

027

,894

158,

064

185,

958

27,8

9415

8,06

418

5,95

827

,894

158,

064

185,

958

83,6

8147

4,19

355

7,87

4Pr

ice

Esca

latio

n0

00

00

00

00

8,80

611

,692

20,4

9811

,412

14,7

4726

,159

14,2

0317

,858

32,0

6034

,420

44,2

9778

,717

Sub-

tota

l 283

,681

474,

193

557,

874

00

00

00

36,7

0016

9,75

620

6,45

639

,306

172,

812

212,

117

42,0

9617

5,92

221

8,01

911

8,10

251

8,49

063

6,59

2Ph

ysic

al C

ontin

genc

y (8

%)

00

00

00

00

02,

477

14,0

3916

,516

2,54

514

,424

16,9

692,

616

14,8

2517

,441

7,63

943

,288

50,9

27Co

nsul

ting

Cost

for D

etai

led

Des

ign

10,0

8518

,730

28,8

165,

043

9,36

514

,408

5,04

39,

365

14,4

080

00

00

00

00

10,0

8518

,730

28,8

16Co

nsul

ting

Cost

for C

onst

ruct

ion

Man

agem

ent

20,1

6837

,456

57,6

240

00

00

06,

723

12,4

8519

,208

6,72

312

,485

19,2

086,

723

12,4

8519

,208

20,1

6837

,456

57,6

24PF

DA

Adm

inis

tratio

n Co

st (P

MO

)5,

544

05,

544

00

00

00

1,84

80

1,84

81,

848

01,

848

1,84

80

1,84

85,

544

05,

544

Fish

Por

t Man

agem

ent (

T/A

)1,

852

10,4

9712

,350

00

00

00

617

3,49

94,

117

617

3,49

94,

117

617

3,49

94,

117

1,85

210

,497

12,3

50La

nd A

ccru

emen

t Exp

ense

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0To

tal

121,

332

540,

876

662,

208

5,04

39,

365

14,4

085,

043

9,36

514

,408

48,3

6619

9,77

924

8,14

551

,039

203,

220

254,

259

53,9

0120

6,73

226

0,63

316

3,39

162

8,46

179

1,85

3

Sual

Base

Cos

t (Co

nstru

ctio

n W

orks

)36

,830

208,

705

245,

535

00

00

00

16,1

1391

,308

107,

421

18,4

1510

4,35

212

2,76

72,

302

13,0

4415

,346

36,8

3020

8,70

524

5,53

5V

AT

(12%

)4,

420

25,0

4529

,464

00

00

00

1,93

410

,957

12,8

912,

210

12,5

2214

,732

276

1,56

51,

842

4,42

025

,045

29,4

64Su

b-to

tal 1

41,2

5023

3,74

927

4,99

90

00

00

018

,047

102,

265

120,

312

20,6

2511

6,87

513

7,49

92,

578

14,6

0917

,187

41,2

5023

3,74

927

4,99

9Lu

cena

Base

Cos

t (Co

nstru

ctio

n W

orks

)35

,906

203,

468

239,

374

00

00

00

8,97

750

,867

59,8

4417

,953

101,

734

119,

687

8,97

750

,867

59,8

4435

,906

203,

468

239,

374

VA

T (1

2%)

4,30

924

,416

28,7

250

00

00

01,

077

6,10

47,

181

2,15

412

,208

14,3

621,

077

6,10

47,

181

4,30

924

,416

28,7

25Su

b-to

tal 2

40,2

1522

7,88

426

8,09

90

00

00

010

,054

56,9

7167

,025

20,1

0711

3,94

213

4,04

910

,054

56,9

7167

,025

40,2

1522

7,88

426

8,09

9Ca

mal

igan

Base

Cos

t (Co

nstru

ctio

n W

orks

)19

,780

112,

085

131,

864

00

00

00

6,29

435

,663

41,9

577,

193

40,7

5847

,951

6,29

435

,663

41,9

5719

,780

112,

085

131,

864

VA

T (1

2%)

2,37

413

,450

15,8

240

00

00

075

54,

280

5,03

586

34,

891

5,75

475

54,

280

5,03

52,

374

13,4

5015

,824

Sub-

tota

l 322

,153

125,

535

147,

688

00

00

00

7,04

939

,943

46,9

928,

056

45,6

4953

,705

7,04

939

,943

46,9

9222

,153

125,

535

147,

688

Sub-

tota

l 4 (=

1+2+

3)10

3,61

858

7,16

869

0,78

60

00

00

035

,149

199,

179

234,

328

48,7

8827

6,46

632

5,25

419

,681

111,

523

131,

204

103,

618

587,

168

690,

786

Pric

e Es

cala

tion

00

00

00

00

011

,097

14,7

3325

,830

19,9

6025

,794

45,7

5410

,021

12,6

0022

,620

41,0

7753

,126

94,2

04Su

b-to

tal 5

103,

618

587,

168

690,

786

00

00

00

46,2

4621

3,91

226

0,15

868

,748

302,

260

371,

008

29,7

0112

4,12

315

3,82

414

4,69

564

0,29

478

4,99

0Ph

ysic

al C

ontin

genc

y (8

%)

00

00

00

00

03,

122

17,6

9120

,813

4,45

225

,229

29,6

811,

846

10,4

6012

,306

9,42

053

,379

62,7

99Co

nsul

ting

Cost

for D

etai

led

Des

ign

12,4

8823

,193

35,6

816,

244

11,5

9617

,840

6,24

411

,596

17,8

400

00

00

00

00

12,4

8823

,193

35,6

81Co

nsul

ting

Cost

for C

onst

ruct

ion

Man

agem

ent

24,9

7346

,379

71,3

530

00

00

08,

324

15,4

6023

,784

8,32

415

,460

23,7

848,

324

15,4

6023

,784

24,9

7346

,379

71,3

53PF

DA

Adm

inis

tratio

n Co

st (P

MO

)8,

014

08,

014

00

00

00

2,67

10

2,67

12,

671

02,

671

2,67

10

2,67

18,

014

08,

014

Fish

Por

t Man

agem

ent (

T/A

)1,

852

10,4

9712

,350

00

00

00

617

3,49

94,

117

617

3,49

94,

117

617

3,49

94,

117

1,85

210

,497

12,3

50La

nd A

ccru

emen

t Exp

ense

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0To

tal

150,

946

667,

237

818,

183

6,24

411

,596

17,8

406,

244

11,5

9617

,840

60,9

8125

0,56

231

1,54

384

,814

346,

447

431,

261

43,1

6115

3,54

219

6,70

220

1,44

477

3,74

397

5,18

7

Dav

aoBa

se C

ost (

Cons

truct

ion

Wor

ks)

10,1

5457

,538

67,6

920

00

00

03,

173

17,9

8121

,154

5,07

728

,769

33,8

461,

904

10,7

8812

,692

10,1

5457

,538

67,6

92V

AT

(12%

)1,

218

6,90

58,

123

00

00

00

381

2,15

82,

538

609

3,45

24,

061

228

1,29

51,

523

1,21

86,

905

8,12

3Su

b-to

tal 1

11,3

7264

,442

75,8

150

00

00

03,

554

20,1

3823

,692

5,68

632

,221

37,9

072,

132

12,0

8314

,215

11,3

7264

,442

75,8

15Bi

slig

Base

Cos

t (Co

nstru

ctio

n W

orks

)85

,618

485,

170

570,

788

00

00

00

21,4

0512

1,29

214

2,69

734

,247

194,

068

228,

315

29,9

6616

9,80

919

9,77

685

,618

485,

170

570,

788

VA

T (1

2%)

10,2

7458

,220

68,4

950

00

00

02,

569

14,5

5517

,124

4,11

023

,288

27,3

983,

596

20,3

7723

,973

10,2

7458

,220

68,4

95Su

b-to

tal 2

95,8

9254

3,39

063

9,28

30

00

00

023

,973

135,

848

159,

821

38,3

5721

7,35

625

5,71

333

,562

190,

187

223,

749

95,8

9254

3,39

063

9,28

3Su

b-to

tal 3

(=1+

2)10

7,26

560

7,83

371

5,09

70

00

00

027

,527

155,

986

183,

513

44,0

4324

9,57

729

3,62

035

,695

202,

270

237,

964

107,

265

607,

833

715,

097

Pric

e Es

cala

tion

00

00

00

00

08,

690

11,5

3820

,228

18,0

1923

,285

41,3

0418

,174

22,8

5241

,027

44,8

8457

,675

102,

559

Sub-

tota

l 4

107,

265

607,

833

715,

097

00

00

00

36,2

1716

7,52

420

3,74

162

,062

272,

863

334,

924

53,8

6922

5,12

227

8,99

115

2,14

866

5,50

881

7,65

6Ph

ysic

al C

ontin

genc

y (8

%)

00

00

00

00

02,

445

13,8

5416

,299

4,01

922

,775

26,7

943,

348

18,9

7122

,319

9,81

255

,601

65,4

12Co

nsul

ting

Cost

for D

etai

led

Des

ign

12,9

2824

,009

36,9

376,

464

12,0

0418

,468

6,46

412

,004

18,4

680

00

00

00

00

12,9

2824

,009

36,9

37Co

nsul

ting

Cost

for C

onst

ruct

ion

Man

agem

ent

25,8

5248

,011

73,8

640

00

00

08,

617

16,0

0424

,621

8,61

716

,004

24,6

218,

617

16,0

0424

,621

25,8

5248

,011

73,8

64PF

DA

Adm

inis

tratio

n Co

st (P

MO

)6,

612

06,

612

00

00

00

2,20

40

2,20

42,

204

02,

204

2,20

40

2,20

46,

612

06,

612

Fish

Por

t Man

agem

ent (

T/A

)1,

852

10,4

9712

,350

00

00

00

617

3,49

94,

117

617

3,49

94,

117

617

3,49

94,

117

1,85

210

,497

12,3

50La

nd A

ccru

emen

t Exp

ense

20,0

000

20,0

000

00

20,0

000

20,0

000

00

00

00

00

20,0

000

20,0

00To

tal

174,

509

690,

350

864,

860

6,46

412

,004

18,4

6826

,464

12,0

0438

,468

50,1

0120

0,88

125

0,98

277

,520

315,

140

392,

660

68,6

5626

3,59

633

2,25

222

9,20

580

3,62

61,

032,

831

2 3

Uni

t: 1,

000

PHP

1

2015

2016

Tota

lPa

ckag

eRe

gion

alFi

sh P

ort

Mun

icip

alFi

sh P

ort

Item

sBa

se C

ost (

2010

)20

1220

1320

14

Tab

le 2

1.5

Ann

ual F

undi

ng P

lan

for

Eac

h Pa

ckag

e (R

egio

nal F

ish

Port

Onl

y)

Page 18: Fig. 17.15 Calabanga Fish Port · 2011. 1. 26. · Fig. 17.16 Pasacao Fish Port (3) (2) (1) A-253 Appendix 17 Present condition of causeway (1) Proposed back up area for fish port

Appendix 21

A-268

Lo

cal

Fore

ign

Tota

lLo

cal

Fore

ign

Tota

lLo

cal

Fore

ign

Tota

lLo

cal

Fore

ign

Tota

lLo

cal

Fore

ign

Tota

lLo

cal

Fore

ign

Tota

lLo

cal

Fore

ign

Tota

lIlo

iloBa

se C

ost

28,6

8725

8,17

928

6,86

60

00

00

09,

562

86,0

6095

,622

9,56

286

,060

95,6

229,

562

86,0

6095

,622

28,6

8725

8,17

928

6,86

6V

AT

(12%

)3,

442

30,9

8134

,424

00

00

00

1,14

710

,327

11,4

751,

147

10,3

2711

,475

1,14

710

,327

11,4

753,

442

30,9

8134

,424

Sub-

tota

l 132

,129

289,

161

321,

290

00

00

00

10,7

1096

,387

107,

097

10,7

1096

,387

107,

097

10,7

1096

,387

107,

097

32,1

2928

9,16

132

1,29

0Su

alBa

se C

ost

13,7

2812

3,55

213

7,28

00

00

00

04,

576

41,1

8445

,760

4,57

641

,184

45,7

604,

576

41,1

8445

,760

13,7

2812

3,55

213

7,28

0V

AT

(12%

)1,

647

14,8

2616

,474

00

00

00

549

4,94

25,

491

549

4,94

25,

491

549

4,94

25,

491

1,64

714

,826

16,4

74Su

b-to

tal 2

15,3

7513

8,37

815

3,75

30

00

00

05,

125

46,1

2651

,251

5,12

546

,126

51,2

515,

125

46,1

2651

,251

15,3

7513

8,37

815

3,75

3Lu

cena

Base

Cos

t 3,

708

33,3

6937

,076

00

00

00

1,23

611

,123

12,3

591,

236

11,1

2312

,359

1,23

611

,123

12,3

593,

708

33,3

6937

,076

VA

T (1

2%)

445

4,00

44,

449

00

00

00

148

1,33

51,

483

148

1,33

51,

483

148

1,33

51,

483

445

4,00

44,

449

Sub-

tota

l 3

4,15

337

,373

41,5

250

00

00

01,

384

12,4

5813

,842

1,38

412

,458

13,8

421,

384

12,4

5813

,842

4,15

337

,373

41,5

25C

amal

igan

Bas

e C

ost

16,3

7614

7,38

316

3,75

90

00

00

05,

459

49,1

2854

,586

5,45

949

,128

54,5

865,

459

49,1

2854

,586

16,3

7614

7,38

316

3,75

9V

AT

(12%

)1,

965

17,6

8619

,651

00

00

00

655

5,89

56,

550

655

5,89

56,

550

655

5,89

56,

550

1,96

517

,686

19,6

51Su

b-to

tal 4

18

,341

165,

069

183,

410

00

00

00

6,11

455

,023

61,1

376,

114

55,0

2361

,137

6,11

455

,023

61,1

3718

,341

165,

069

183,

410

Dav

aoB

ase

Cos

t 5,

673

51,0

5356

,726

00

00

00

1,89

117

,018

18,9

091,

891

17,0

1818

,909

1,89

117

,018

18,9

095,

673

51,0

5356

,726

VA

T (1

2%)

681

6,12

66,

807

00

00

00

227

2,04

22,

269

227

2,04

22,

269

227

2,04

22,

269

681

6,12

66,

807

Sub-

tota

l 5

6,35

357

,179

63,5

330

00

00

02,

118

19,0

6021

,178

2,11

819

,060

21,1

782,

118

19,0

6021

,178

6,35

357

,179

63,5

33B

islig

Base

Cos

t 27

,333

245,

994

273,

327

00

00

00

9,11

181

,998

91,1

099,

111

81,9

9891

,109

9,11

181

,998

91,1

0927

,333

245,

994

273,

327

VA

T (1

2%)

3,28

029

,519

32,7

990

00

00

01,

093

9,84

010

,933

1,09

39,

840

10,9

331,

093

9,84

010

,933

3,28

029

,519

32,7

99Su

b-to

tal 6

30

,613

275,

513

306,

126

00

00

00

10,2

0491

,838

102,

042

10,2

0491

,838

102,

042

10,2

0491

,838

102,

042

30,6

1327

5,51

330

6,12

6Su

b-to

tal 7

(=1+

2+3+

4+5+

6)10

6,96

496

2,67

31,

069,

637

00

00

00

35,6

5532

0,89

135

6,54

635

,655

320,

891

356,

546

35,6

5532

0,89

135

6,54

610

6,96

496

2,67

31,

069,

637

Iloilo

Base

Cos

t ( S

olar

Pow

er S

yste

m w

ithou

t Bat

ter

37,7

5033

9,75

037

7,50

00

00

00

012

,583

113,

250

125,

833

12,5

8311

3,25

012

5,83

312

,583

113,

250

125,

833

37,7

5033

9,75

037

7,50

0V

AT

(12%

)4,

530

40,7

7045

,300

00

00

00

1,51

013

,590

15,1

001,

510

13,5

9015

,100

1,51

013

,590

15,1

004,

530

40,7

7045

,300

Sub-

tota

l 842

,280

380,

520

422,

800

00

00

00

14,0

9312

6,84

014

0,93

314

,093

126,

840

140,

933

14,0

9312

6,84

014

0,93

342

,280

380,

520

422,

800

Iloilo

Base

Cos

t 5,

342

48,0

7553

,417

00

00

00

1,78

116

,025

17,8

061,

781

16,0

2517

,806

1,78

116

,025

17,8

065,

342

48,0

7553

,417

VA

T (1

2%)

641

5,76

96,

410

00

00

00

214

1,92

32,

137

214

1,92

32,

137

214

1,92

32,

137

641

5,76

96,

410

Sub-

tota

l 9

5,98

353

,844

59,8

270

00

00

01,

994

17,9

4819

,942

1,99

417

,948

19,9

421,

994

17,9

4819

,942

5,98

353

,844

59,8

27Su

alBa

se C

ost

2,89

926

,088

28,9

870

00

00

096

68,

696

9,66

296

68,

696

9,66

296

68,

696

9,66

22,

899

26,0

8828

,987

VA

T (1

2%)

348

3,13

13,

478

00

00

00

116

1,04

41,

159

116

1,04

41,

159

116

1,04

41,

159

348

3,13

13,

478

Sub-

tota

l 10

3,24

729

,219

32,4

660

00

00

01,

082

9,74

010

,822

1,08

29,

740

10,8

221,

082

9,74

010

,822

3,24

729

,219

32,4

66Lu

cena

Base

Cos

t 52

84,

752

5,28

00

00

00

017

61,

584

1,76

017

61,

584

1,76

017

61,

584

1,76

052

84,

752

5,28

0V

AT

(12%

)63

570

634

00

00

00

2119

021

121

190

211

2119

021

163

570

634

Sub-

tota

l 11

591

5,32

25,

913

00

00

00

197

1,77

41,

971

197

1,77

41,

971

197

1,77

41,

971

591

5,32

25,

913

Cam

alig

anB

ase

Cos

t 3,

200

28,8

0232

,002

00

00

00

1,06

79,

601

10,6

671,

067

9,60

110

,667

1,06

79,

601

10,6

673,

200

28,8

0232

,002

VA

T (1

2%)

384

3,45

63,

840

00

00

00

128

1,15

21,

280

128

1,15

21,

280

128

1,15

21,

280

384

3,45

63,

840

Sub-

tota

l 12

3,58

432

,258

35,8

420

00

00

01,

195

10,7

5311

,947

1,19

510

,753

11,9

471,

195

10,7

5311

,947

3,58

432

,258

35,8

42D

avao

Bas

e C

ost

2,25

120

,257

22,5

080

00

00

075

06,

752

7,50

375

06,

752

7,50

375

06,

752

7,50

32,

251

20,2

5722

,508

VA

T (1

2%)

270

2,43

12,

701

00

00

00

9081

090

090

810

900

9081

090

027

02,

431

2,70

1Su

b-to

tal 1

32,

521

22,6

8825

,209

00

00

00

840

7,56

38,

403

840

7,56

38,

403

840

7,56

38,

403

2,52

122

,688

25,2

09B

islig

Base

Cos

t 96

38,

670

9,63

30

00

00

032

12,

890

3,21

132

12,

890

3,21

132

12,

890

3,21

196

38,

670

9,63

3V

AT

(12%

)11

61,

040

1,15

60

00

00

039

347

385

3934

738

539

347

385

116

1,04

01,

156

Sub-

tota

l 14

1,07

99,

710

10,7

890

00

00

036

03,

237

3,59

636

03,

237

3,59

636

03,

237

3,59

61,

079

9,71

010

,789

Sub-

tota

l 15

(=9+

10+1

1+12

+13+

14)

17,0

0515

3,04

117

0,04

50

00

00

05,

668

51,0

1456

,682

5,66

851

,014

56,6

825,

668

51,0

1456

,682

17,0

0515

3,04

117

0,04

5To

tal o

f Sub

-pac

kage

1, 2

and

3

Su

btot

al 1

6 (=

7+8+

1516

6,24

81,

496,

234

1,66

2,48

20

00

00

055

,416

498,

745

554,

161

55,4

1649

8,74

555

4,16

155

,416

498,

745

554,

161

166,

248

1,49

6,23

41,

662,

482

Pric

e Es

cala

tion

00

00

00

00

017

,495

36,8

9154

,386

22,6

7246

,532

69,2

0428

,216

56,3

4784

,563

68,3

8313

9,77

020

8,15

3Su

b-to

tal 1

716

6,24

81,

496,

234

1,66

2,48

20

00

00

072

,911

535,

635

608,

546

78,0

8854

5,27

762

3,36

583

,632

555,

092

638,

724

234,

631

1,63

6,00

41,

870,

635

Phys

ical

Con

tinge

ncy

(8%

)0

00

00

00

00

7,30

341

,381

48,6

847,

480

42,3

8949

,869

7,66

543

,433

51,0

9822

,448

127,

203

149,

651

Cons

ultin

g Co

st fo

r Det

aile

d D

esig

n30

,055

55,8

1685

,871

15,0

2727

,908

42,9

3615

,027

27,9

0842

,936

00

00

00

00

030

,055

55,8

1685

,871

Cons

ultin

g Co

st fo

r Con

stru

ctio

n M

anag

emen

t60

,102

111,

619

171,

721

00

00

00

20,0

3437

,206

57,2

4020

,034

37,2

0657

,240

20,0

3437

,206

57,2

4060

,102

111,

619

171,

721

PFD

A A

dmin

istra

tion

Cost

(PM

O)

4,32

80

4,32

80

00

00

01,

443

01,

443

1,44

30

1,44

31,

443

01,

443

4,32

80

4,32

8Fi

sh P

ort M

anag

emen

t (T/

A)

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0La

nd A

ccru

emen

t Exp

ense

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0To

tal

260,

734

1,66

3,66

81,

924,

402

15,0

2727

,908

42,9

3615

,027

27,9

0842

,936

101,

690

614,

223

715,

913

107,

045

624,

872

731,

917

112,

774

635,

731

748,

505

351,

564

1,93

0,64

22,

282,

206

Loca

lFo

reig

nTo

tal

Loca

lFo

reig

nTo

tal

Loca

lFo

reig

nTo

tal

Loca

lFo

reig

nTo

tal

Loca

lFo

reig

nTo

tal

Loca

lFo

reig

nTo

tal

Loca

lFo

reig

nTo

tal

Am

ount

per

yea

r -

- -

32,7

7860

,874

93,6

5252

,778

60,8

7411

3,65

226

1,13

91,

265,

445

1,52

6,58

332

0,41

81,

489,

679

1,81

0,09

727

8,49

11,

259,

601

1,53

8,09

294

5,60

44,

136,

472

5,08

2,07

6

Acc

umul

ated

Am

ount

707,

521

3,56

2,13

24,

269,

653

32,7

7860

,874

93,6

5285

,556

121,

748

207,

304

346,

695

1,38

7,19

21,

733,

887

667,

113

2,87

6,87

13,

543,

984

945,

604

4,13

6,47

25,

082,

076

- -

-

Not

e:

*Loa

n C

omm

itmen

t Cha

rge

= T

otal

Cos

t x 0

.85

x 0.

1% x

7 y

ears

= 3

1,97

2 (1

,000

PH

P) a

nd T

he G

over

nmen

t of t

he P

hilip

pine

s (G

OP)

is b

urde

ned

the

amou

nt.

*Exc

hang

e Ra

te: 1

US$

=JPY

90.5

20=P

HP

46.3

12T

OT

AL

5,08

2,07

6

2016

Tota

l

Japa

nese

Yen

Loa

n (8

5% o

f Tot

al A

mou

nt)

Cur

renc

y Po

tion

Uni

t: 1,

000

PHP

Pack

age

Item

sBa

se C

ost (

2010

)20

1220

1320

1420

15Su

b-Pa

ckag

eRe

gion

alFi

sh P

ort

2013

2014

2015

1. Ice Making & Refrigeration Facilities2.

SolarPowerSystem

3. Other Equipment

2016

Tota

lTo

tal o

f all

Pack

ages

4

Base

Cos

t (20

10)

2012

Loca

l Pot

ion

(15

% o

f Tot

al A

mou

nt)

(1,0

00 P

HP)

JPY

Equ

ival

ent

(1,0

00JP

Y)

4,31

9,76

58,

443,

278

762,

311

Tab

le 2

1.5

Ann

ual F

und

Plan

of E

ach

Pack

age

(Reg

iona

l Fis

h Po

rt O

nly)

(Con

tinue

d)