FIELD ACTIVITY MONITORING REPORT - RI/FS OVERSIGHT · SECTION 3.0 SECTION 4.0 SECTION 5.0 SECTION 6.0 SECTION 7.0 Introduction 1.1 Scope of Work ... This activity was assigned under

I a 0 0 0 0 0 2 8

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYTECHNICAL ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT

ATHAZARDOUS WASTE SITES

TES IVCONTRACT NO. 68-01-7351

WORK ASSIGNMENT NO. 361

FIELD ACTIVITIESMONITORING REPORT

FADROWSKI DRUM DISPOSALFRANKLIN, WISCONSIN

RI/FS OVERSIGHTEPA REGION V

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.PROJECT NUMBER: 05-B361-00

PREPARED BY:METCALF & EDDY, INC.

FEBRUARY 1989

JE JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC.ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS DIVISION

222 S. RIVERSIDE PLAZA - SUITE 1870 CHICAGO, ILINOiS 60606 (312) 648-0002 -Ax (312j 648-055'

February 14, 1989

Mr. Rober t WhippoTES IV Pr imary ContactU.S. E n v i r o n m e n t a l Protection AgencyRegion V230 South Dearborn StreetChicago, IL 60604

Re: Contract No. 68-01-7351Project No. 05-B361-00Work Assignment No. 361Fadrowski Drum DisposalFranklin, WisconsinRI/FS OversightCERCLA, Region V

Dear Mr. Whippo:

Please f ind submit ted herewith one copy of the Field Act iv i t i es Moni tor ing Reportfor the Fadrowski Drum Disposal site in Frankl in , Wisconsin. Please note that allPhase I RI f ie ld act ivi t ies were completed January 26, 1989.

If you have any questions or require addi t ional i n fo rma t ion , please fee l f ree tocontact Carol Meyer at (312) 228-0900, or me at (312) 648-0002.

Sincere ly ,

Dean GeersRegional Manager

Enclosure

cc: E. Howard

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION 1.0

SECTION 2.0

SECTION 3.0

SECTION 4.0

SECTION 5.0

SECTION 6.0

SECTION 7.0

Introduction1.1 Scope of Work1.2 Site Background1.3 Project Approach

Geophysical Survey2.1 Purpose2.2 Methods

Test Pit Excavations3.1 Purpose3.2 Test Pit Locations3.3 Test Pit Excavation Methods

3.3.1 Equipment3.3.2 Excavation Procedures3.3.3 Test Pit Descriptions3.3.4 Decontamination3.3.5 Soil Sample Collection

Surface Water and SedimentSample Collection4.1 Purpose4.2 Sample Collection Locations4.3 Sample Collection Methods4.4 Decontamination

Soils Investigation5.1 Purpose5.2 Soil Boring Locations5.3 Borehole Drilling Methods

5.3.1 Equipment5.3.2 Drilling Procedures5.3.3 Decontamination5.3.4 Soil Sample Collection

Monitoring Well Installation6.1 Purpose6.2 Well Locations6.3 Well Construction

6.3.1 Well Materials6.3.2 Installation Procedures6.3.3 Decontamination

Monitoring Well Development7.1 Well Development7.2 Field Measurements

Page

1111

555

6666668910

121212121214

1616161616161819

20202020202022

232323

FDDSl/toc

TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT'D)

SECTION 8.0

SECTION 9.0

SECTION 10.0

Page

Groundwater Sample Collection 248.1 Purpose 2 48.2 Sampling Locations 248.3 Sample Collection Methods 24

8.3.1 Equipment 248.3.2 Sampling Procedures 248.3.3 Decontamination 25

8.4 Oversight Groundwater SampleCollection 268.4.1 Oversight Sampling Locations 268.4.2 Oversight Sample Collection

Methods 26

Aquifer Characterization 289.1 Purpose 289.2 Methods 28

Summary 2 910.1 Problems Encountered/Resolution 2910.2 Departures from PRPs Work Plan 31

REFERENCES

APPENDIX AAPPENDIX BAPPENDIX CAPPENDIX D -

Chronology of EventsPhoto LogField LogSampling Paperwork

LIST OF FIGURES

FIGUREFIGURE

FIGUREFIGURE

3.2-14.2-1

5.2-16.2-1

Test Locations for Waste Characterization 7Surface Water and Sediment SampleLocations 13

Locations of Soil Borings 17Locations of Phase I Monitoring Wells 21

FDDSl/toc

SECTION 1.0INTRODUCTION

1.1 Scope of Work

At the request of the United States EnvironmentalProtection Agency (U.S.EPA), Region V, JacobsEngineering Group, Inc. (Jacobs) was issued a WorkAssignment to provide compliance monitoring of RemedialInvestigation/Feasibility Studies (RI/FS) activities atthe Fadrowski Drum Disposal Site in Franklin,Wisconsin. This activity was assigned under theTechnical Enforcement Support (TES) Contract number 68-01-7351. Jacobs subcontracted Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.(M&E) to provide this compliance monitoring. The scopeof this work consisted of Work Plan Preparation, ReviewBackground Information/Consent Order, Review PRPProject Plans, Prepare RI Project Plan Review, RemedialInvestigation Oversight, Collect Split Samples, andPrepare Draft/Final Risk Assessment Report.

1.2 Site Background

The Fadrowski Drum Disposal site covers approximately20 acres in a semi-rural area in Franklin, Wisconsin.From 1970 through 1981 the site was operated as alandfill for demolition and construction waste. Duringconstruction activities in 1983, buried drums wereexposed. Samples taken of drum contents were found tobe hazardous materials. The exposed drums weresubsequently re-covered. The release of hazardousmaterials at the site provides the potential forcontamination of groundwater and surface water in thevicinity of the site.

An RI/FS is being conducted by Warzyn Engineering, Inc.(Warzyn) of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, on behalf of thePRPs. The purpose of the RI is to determine the natureand extent of contamination at the Fadrowski DrumDisposal site in order to support the activities of theFS. The purpose of the FS is to develop and evaluateappropriate remedial action alternatives based on theRI data and report. Warzyn performed the RI fieldactivities for data collection from August 15, 1988through August 19, 1988; from November 29, 1988 throughJanuary 5, 1989 and from January 23, 1989 throughJanuary 26, 1989.

1.3 Project Approach

The TES Contractor was requested to provide compliancemonitoring of RI activities at the Fadrowski DrumDisposal site. M&E was given this work assignment.

FDDSl/a

A work plan was prepared which describes the effortrequired to provide contractor oversight for theFadrowski project. This work plan addressed theoutline of tasks contained in U.S. EPA's TechnicalStatement of Work. The work plan consists of thefollowing activities:

Prepare Work PlanReview Background Information/Consent OrderReview PRP Project PlansPrepare RI Project Plan ReviewRemedial Investigation OversightCollect Split SamplesPrepare Draft and Final Risk Assessment Reports

Each of these activities is discussed below.

Preparation of Work Plan

Upon receipt of the TES Work Assignment, a work planwas prepared that presents a breakdown of the tasks andcosts necessary to complete the project.

Review Background Information/Consent Order

In order to familiarize TES personnel with the fieldactivities to be undertaken during the RI, the ConsentOrder and other relevant background informationprovided by the EPA Primary Contact was reviewed.

Review Project Plans

M&E reviewed the RI/FS project plans prepared by thePRPs. These included the Work Plan, Sampling Plan,Health and Safety (H&S) Plan and the Quality AssuranceProject Plan (QAPP). Prior to initiation of oversightactivities, M&E provided review of these documents toensure that the sampling procedures and writtenprotocols for all field activities were technicallyadequate and consistent with the National ContingencyPlan.

Prepare RI Project Plan Review Report

M&E reviewed technical documents submitted to the U.S.EPA by the PRP in compliance with the Consent Order.The Project Plans were reviewed for consistency withthe Consent Order; and also to assess whether proposeddata collection activities would provide adequateinformation to prepare a comprehensive Risk Assessment,and permit detailed evaluation of potential remedialaction alternatives in the FS.

FDDSl/a

Remedial Investigation Oversight

The TES Contractor provided field oversight of RIactivities at the Fadrowski Drum Disposal site asdirected by the U.S. EPA Primary Contact. The RIactivities which were monitored were:

geophysical surveygroundwater monitoring well installationgroundwater, surface water, and soil samplingevents.

The RI field work was monitored for conformance to thesampling protocols and QA/QC procedures contained inthe approved project plans.

A daily log was kept during the compliance monitoringperiod. The log included the following items:

dateactivities performed that dayactivities scheduled for next dayproblems encounteredproblem resolutiondepartures from the Work Planpersonnel on-siteother relevant comments

A copy of the field log was submitted periodically tothe U.S. EPA Primary Contact. A copy of the field logis in Appendix B of this report. RI field activitieswere documented with photographs. These photographsare in Appendix C.

M&E oversight personnel followed the personalprotection requirements established in the PRP's Healthand Safety Plan for the project.

Collect Split Samples

M&E participated in a split sampling program asdirected by U.S. EPA's primary contact during the RIsampling activities. A description of the samplingtechniques and quality assurance/quality control(QA/QC) objectives were described in M&E's RevisedQAPjP for Oversight Sampling submitted November 3,1988. This QAPjP was approved by the Quality AssuranceSection of the U.S. EPA on December 12, 1988.Groundwater samples were collected from January 23,1989 through January 26, 1989 by Warzyn. These sampleswere split by M&E in accordance with the QAPjP.

FDDSl/a

Prepare Draft/Final Risk Assessment Report

The TES Contractor will prepare a Draft/Final RiskAssessment Report for the Fadrowski site using the database generated during the PRP Remedial Investigation.The Draft/Final Risk Assessment Report will address thefollowing areas identified in the U.S. EPA TechnicalStatement of Work:

0 Identify hazardous substances present in allaffected environmental media;

0 Enironmental fate and transport mechanisms ineffect;

° Identify applicable health standards and criteria;0 Characterize the exposure pathways and the extent

of potential exposure.° Identify the populations at risk; and° Characterize the risk.

FDDSl/a

SECTION 2.0GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY

2.1 Purpose

A geophysical survey was conducted at the Fadrowskisite in order to develop a subsurface profile. Anelectromagnetic conductivity (EM) meter and amagnetometer were used to gain information onsubsurface conditions. This survey was performed fromAugust 15, 1988 through August 19, 1988.

2.2 Methods

A grid system was established across the site fororientation and spacing of profiles. This grid wasoriented with the X-axis trending approximately north-south. The origin of the grid was established in thenortheastern-most corner of the site. Each node on thegrid was characterized by 25-foot spacings. The gridextended from ON,OW to approximately 19S,34W. Portionsof the fill area were surveyed; however, metalcontained in demolition debris may cause too muchinterference to produce useful results.

Warzyn subcontracted Fromm Applied Technology toconduct the survey. An EG&G Geometries Model G-856magnetometer of serial number 27732 was used to performthe magnetometer survey. Magnetometer readings wererecorded in gammas. The EM survey was conducted with aGeonics Limited EM 31 equipped with Geonics LimitedTransmitters Type 84020. A base station wasestablished at 11S,8W for quality assurance. This basestation was visited periodically to assure consistencyof readings.

FDDSl/a

SECTION 3.0TEST PIT EXCAVATIONS

3.1 Purpose

Records indicate that drums containing printing wasteand lubricant sludges may have been buried at theFadrowski site. In order to locate buried drums andother apparent contaminant sources, test pits wereexcavated.

3.2 Test Pit Locations

Nine (9) test pits or trenches were excavated (TP01through TP09). The location of the test pits werebased upon anomalies noted during the geophysicalsurvey. These areas of anomalies were judged toindicate the presence of buried drums or other metallicsources. Test pits TP01 and TP02 were dug on the eastend of the site where little activity was believed tohave taken place. TP03 and TP09 were dug perpendicularto each other in the fill on the north facing slopenear the mid-southern portion of the site. TP04 wasexcavated in an area off the fill northeast of TP03 andwest of TP02. TP05 was excavated in the fill southeastof TP03 on the southern edge of the property. TP06 andTP07 were dug in the fill (waste piles area) above thepond. TP08 was dug northeast of TP07 towards thebottom central area of the site. All test pitlocations were marked and labeled with steel stakes andyellow ribbons. Refer to Figure 3.2-1 for test pitlocations.

3.3 Test Pit Excavation Methods

3.3.1 Equipment

Warzyn subcontracted E&K Hauling to perform theexcavations. A Caterpillar backhoe (C-Series2650) with track wheels was used to dig the testpits. Soil samples of the material in the testpits were collected by Warzyn with a stainlesssteel spoon. These samples were composited in astainless steel mixing bowl.

3.3.2 Excavation Procedures

Each test pit was dug in the fill area untilnatural soil conditions (clay/till) wereencountered. Natural soil material occurred atvarying depths. The pits were dug with thebackhoe taking care not to damage any buried drums

FDDSl/a

SOUTH 27TH STREET

LEGEND

TEST PIT LOCATION

AREA INVESTIGATED BT GEOPHYSICALSURVEY

SITE INVESTIGATION BOUNDARY

M APPROXIMATE PROPERTY LINE

FENCE

Figure 3.2-1TEST LOCATCNS FOU WA«TI CMA*»CTIMZAnOW

WORK PLAN : 'REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FtASItllITT STUDYFAOROWKI DRUM DISPOSAL SITEFRANKLIN. MISCONSIN

which may have become exposed. Field personnel inclose proximity to the excavations wore Level Bpersonal protection with air supplied via anairline. Air quality was continuously monitoredfor organic vapors with an HNU photoionizationdetector. If a drum was exposed by the backhoe,it was covered back up with soil since Warzyn wasnot equipped for drum removal at this time.

While excavating the test pits, the material wasdeposited in a pile adjacent to the excavationarea. Upon completion of the test pit, thebackhoe was operated to back fill the excavation.The material was moved from the piles back intothe pit. The area of excavation was staked andflagged with yellow ribbons.

3.3.3 Test Pit Descriptions

The following is an independent summary by M&E ofthe dimensions and materials encountered duringexcavation of test pits. Please refer to Figure3.2-1 for the locations of the test pits.

TP01; The average depth of this pit wasapproximately 7-feet with a maximum depth of 12-feet. The hole was approximately 45-feet inlength and 6-feet in width. An old guard rail wasfound at the south end of the hole with waterseeping in from the east. Natural soil materialwas encountered.

TP02; The pit had a 16-foot depth. The hole was24-feet in length and 7-feet in width. Thematerial encountered consisted of all fill withrebar, concrete, and trash. No natural soilmaterial was encountered.

TP03; This pit varied in length from 5-feet onthe south to 17-feet on the north. The holeaveraged 4-feet across and 66-feet in length.Seven drums were encountered at a depth of 5 - 7feet. These were located at the upper end of thehole (south) where the land slopes. A chemicalodor was also encountered. One drum contained ayellow-green sticky substance oozing from thedrum. Others appeared rotting or rusting andseemed to contain black tar or sludge-likematerial. One drum was also punctured with thebucket but did not seem to be leaking. The words"Dow Chemical" were printed on one of the drumsencountered. A hot zone was developed anddesignated by a yellow ribbon around the pitduring the excavation.

FDDSl/a

TP04; This pit was dug to a depth of 13-feet. Itwas 21-feet in length and 6-feet in width. Thematerial encountered consisted of concrete blocks.No natural soil material was encountered.

TP05; This pit was dug to a depth of 12-feet. Itwas 30-feet in length and averaged 8-feet inwidth. A 5-gallon paint can with blue-yellowpaint was encountered at the surface of the testpit. The hole consisted of concrete blocks, metalstripping, rebar and other debris. No naturalsoil was encountered.

TP06; This pit was dug to a depth of 10 - 12feet. The pit was 33-feet in length and 6 - 8feet in width. The material encountered consistedof concrete, rebar, metal strips, and othermiscellaneous construction debris. No naturalsoil was encountered.

TP07; This pit was dug to a depth of 15-feet. Itwas 28-feet in length and 8 - 1 0 feet in width.The material encountered consisted of concreteblocks with an abundance of black foundry sand.No natural soil was encountered.

TP08; This pit was dug to a depth of 14-feet. Itwas 30-feet in length and approximately 5-feet inwidth. No construction debris or drums wereencountered. The trench contained all naturalmaterial (clay/till).

TP09; This pit was dug to an average depth of 8-feet. It was triangular in shape and was onaverage 28-feet in length and 21-feet across thewidest area. Five drums were encountered at thewide end of the hole at a 3-foot depth. Severalof the drums appeared to be split open or torn.One drum had a black viscous material oozing fromit. The drums were still partially covered withsoil but did not appear to be laying in anyorganized manner. There were no HNU readingsrecorded above background.

3.3.4 Decontamination

Personal decontamination was minimal since allouter clothing used was disposed. Tyvekcoveralls, booties, and latex gloves were disposedin plastic trash bags, placed in yellow plasticdrums (55 gallon) and then removed from the site.

FDDSl/a

The backhoe was not decontaminated before leavingthe site. The bucket part of the backhoe was theonly part of the machinery that actually came incontact with buried drums. However, since HNUreadings on the last hole (TP09) were not abovebackground either at the hole or in the bucket,Warzyn did not feel decontamination was necessarybefore leaving the site.

The stainless steel spoon and mixing bowl weredecontaminated between every test pit or samplelocation. The procedures consisted of scrubbingthe equipment with a soap solution of trisodiumphosphate (TSP) and distilled water, a distilledwater rinse, an acetone rinse, and anotherdistilled water rinse. The exterior of the samplebottles were rinsed with distilled water prior topackaging.

3.3.5 Soil Sample Collection

Soil samples were collected by Warzyn from thefollowing test pits:

TP01; This sample was collected from a continuouslayer of darker soil located approximately 4-feetabove the natural till.

TP02; This sample was collected at a depth of 16-feet from the last backhoe bucket that was broughtup out of the trench.

TP03; This sample was collected near the burieddrums (5-7 foot depth). It was taken from thebackhoe bucket were the soil consisted of materialthat leaked out from the drums.

TP04; This sample was collected from fillmaterial that was brought up from the bottom ofthe hole (13-foot depth).

TP05; This sample was a composite from variouslevels of the test pit.

TP06; This composite sample was collected fromthe last backhoe bucket that collected soil fromthe bottom of the hole (10-12 foot depth).

TP07; This composite sample was collected fromthe last backhoe bucket from the bottom of thehole (15-foot depth). This sample containedfoundry sand.

FDDSl/a 10

TP08; This sample which was collected from thebottom of the hole was all natural material(clay/till). This sample was not submitted forchemical analysis.

TP09; No sample was collected from this test pitsince a sample had already been collected from thebordering test pit (TP03).

The samples collected were submitted for analysisof volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds,pesticides/PCBs, metals and cyanide. The sampleswere shipped to Hazelton Labs of Madison,Wisconsin with the exception of the cyanidesamples which were taken to Warzyn's Madison,Wisconsin laboratory for analysis.

Proper chain of custody, packaging and shippingprocedures were followed by Warzyn.

FDDSl/a 11

SECTION 4.0SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT

SAMPLE COLLECTION

4.1 Purpose

Representative samples of surface water and sedimentswere collected from the site drainage areas todetermine if contaminants are being transported bysurface water movement.

4.2 sample Collection Locations

All sample locations were marked with metal stakes andyellow ribbons. The sample locations are delineated inFigure 4.2-1.

Sample SW01 was a surface water sample collecteddownstream of the site (southwest border) in the creek.

Sample SW02 was a surface water sample collectedupstream of the site (northwest border) in the creek.

Sample SW03 was a surface water sample collected fromthe east-central shore of the pond.

Sample SW04 was a surface water sample collected fromthe cattail marsh beneath the construction debrismounds drainage area at the southwest area of the site.This was sampled in place of a leachate seep which wasnot present at the time of sampling.

Sample SD01 was a sediment sample collected downstreamof the site in the same location as SW01.

Sample SD02 was a sediment sample collected upstream ofthe site in the same location as SW02. A concrete wallas part of the creek bank is located here wheredrainage into creek occurs.

Sample SD03 was a sediment sample collected from theeast central shore of the pond in the same location asSW03.

Sample SD04 was a sediment sample collected from thecattail marsh in the same location as SW04.

4.3 Sample Collection Methods

The surface water samples were collected from the upperone foot of water or less by immersing the samplecontainers. The temperature, specific conductivity,and pH were recorded for each sample.

FDDSl/a 12

SOUTH 27TH STREET

SURFACE WTER AND SEDIMENTSAMPLING LOCATION


APPROXIMATE PROPERTY LINE

FENCE

Figure 4.2-1SURFACE WATER * 8EDMENT SAMPLE L0CATONS

PLANREMEDIAL 1NVESTIUTION/FEASIB1LITT STUDYFADftOUSKI DRUM DISPOSAL SITEFRANKLIN. WISCONSIN

Sample containers for surface water samples consistedof four 32-ounce amber glass bottles for semi-volatileand pesticides analyses; three one-liter polyethylenebottles for cyanides, metals, and alkalinity, chlorideand sulfate analyses; and two 40-ml vials (VOA) for thevolatile organics analysis. More containers were usedat SW02 where a matrix spike duplicate was collectedand at SW03 where a VOA matrix spike/matrix spikeduplicate and a field duplicate were collected.

A field blank with distilled water was also prepared.The samples collected for metals analysis werepreserved with 5-ml of nitric acid (HNO3) and thecyanides were preserved with 5-ml of sodium hydroxide(NaOH).

The sediment samples were collected with a stainlesssteel core sampler. The 4-ounce VOA vials were filleddirectly from the sampler as grab samples. The rest ofthe samples for semi-volatiles, pesticides andinorganics analyses were composited in a stainlesssteel mixing bowl with a stainless steel spoon beforeplacing in 8-ounce jars.

Bob Pearson of Warzyn collected samples SW01 and SW02on December 6, 1988. The rest of the samples werecollected and all were shipped on December 7, 1988.Chain-of-custody and sample packing was completed byBob Pearson offsite for SW01 and SW02 and completedonsite for the rest of the samples.

The surface water and sediment samples were sent toHazelton Laboratories in Madison, Wisconsin foranalysis while the samples for cyanide analysis weresent to Warzyn's own lab in Madison, Wisconsin. Allthe samples were analyzed for the Contract LaboratoryProgram Hazardous Substance List (CLP-HSL) targetinorganic and organic parameters listed in Appendix Bof the Warzyn Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP).The samples were also tested for the indicatorparameters listed in Table 2-1 of the Warzyn QAPP.

4.4 Decontamination

No sampling equipment was used in collecting thesurface water samples since the samples were collecteddirectly into the containers by immersion. A clean setof latex disposable gloves was worn to collect everysample.

The stainless steel core sampler, spoon, and mixingbowl used to collect and composite the sediment sampleswere decontaminated between every sample location. Theprocedure consisted of a soap and water rinse (TSP

FDDSl/a 14

solution), distilled water rinse, acetone rinse ananother distilled water rinse. The exterior oTthisample bottles was rinsed with distilled wafe?

FDDSl/a 15

SECTION 5.0SOILS INVESTIGATION

5.1 Purpose

Soil borings were performed to investigate thepotential of soil contamination at the site. Thesesamples were analyzed for U.S. EPA CLP HSL parameters.Samples of soil were collected continuously with asplit-spoon sampler to a minimum depth of 10-feet. Ifnatural soils were not encountered at or before a depthof 10-feet, sampling continued. Once natural soilswere observed, the boring was terminated.

5.2 Soil Boring Locations

A total of 25 soil borings were completed at locationsroughly corresponding to those indicated on Figure5.2-1.

5.3 Borehole Drilling Methods

5.3.1 Equipment

All soil borings at the site were completed usinga Diedrich D-25 drill rig, with the exception ofsoil borings SB-12 through SB-17, inclusive.These six borings were completed using a CME-75drill rig. The soil samples were collected with a2-inch O.D., 2-foot long, split-spoon samplerattached to the drill rods of the rigs.

5.3.2 Drilling Procedures

Boreholes drilled using the Diedrich D-25 rig werecompleted in the following manner: the boreholewas started by driving a 2-inch O.D. split-spoonsampler from the surface to a depth of 2-feet.The split spoon was then removed.

The boring was then continued by drilling to adepth of 2-feet using a 2-1/4 inch I.D. hollowstem auger (HSA). Upon advancing the HSA 2-feet,the auger was removed.

A split-spoon sampler was then screwed onto thedrill rod and lowered into the borehole. Thedrill rod was then attached to a 140-pound slidehammer, and driven into the soil from a depth of2-feet to 4-feet. The drill rod with attachedsampler was raised from the borehole and thesampler was removed and opened.

FDDSl/a 16

27TH STREET

LEGEND

± APPROXWATC SOL BORING LOCATION



FENCE

Figure 5.2-1LOCATONS OP SCNL SONMOS

WORK PLANREMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDYFADROMSKI DRUM DISPOSAL SITEFRANKLIN. WISCONSIN

This process was then repeated until a minimumdepth of 10-feet was reached. If natural soilswere not reached prior to or at the 10-footinterval, the borehole was continued until naturalsoils were reached.

Boreholes SB12 and SB15, inclusive were completedusing a CME 75 drill rig. The boreholes weredrilled using the following method. A 4-1/4 inchI.D. HSA was used to start the borehole. A 2-inchdiameter split-spoon sampler was driven from thesurface to a depth of 2-feet into the hole. Thesplit-spoon sampler was then removed.

A drilling rod with a plug end was then advancedalong with the HSA. Upon advancing the HSA 2-feet, the drill rod and plug were removed. Asplit-spoon sampler was screwed onto the drill rodand lowered into the HSA. The drill rod was thenattached to a 140-pound slide hammer, and poundedinto the soil from a depth of 2 to 4 feet. Thedrill rod with attached sampler was raised fromthe borehole and the sampler was removed andopened.

This process was then repeated until a minimumdepth of 10-feet was reached. If natural soilswere not reached prior to or at the 10-footinterval, the borehole was continued until naturalsoils were reached.

Boreholes SB16 and SB17 were also completed usinga CME 75 drill rig. However, instead of using 4-1/4 inch I.D. HSA, 2-1/4 inch I.D. HSA wereutilized for drilling purposes. All otherdrilling and sampling methodology for these twoborings is the same as that used to complete thesoil borings with the previously mentionedDeidrich D-25 rig.

Upon completion of soil borings, all boreholeswere backfilled with bentonite.


Prior to drilling, the drill rig, HSA and drillrods were steam cleaned using a steam cleaningunit powered by a portable generator. Municipalwater was supplied via a hose attached to theMenard's store adjacent to the site. A watersample of the water used in the steam cleaner wascollected on December 29, 1988 for analysis ofvolatile and semi-volatile organic compounds,

FDDSl/a 18

pesticides, metals, cyanide, chloride, sulfate andalkalinity. At each sampling location, eachsplit-spoon was used once and then washed with asolution consisting of warm water and TSP. Therig, HSA, rods, and split-spoons were steamcleaned between boreholes.

5.3.4 Soil sample Collection

Sampling at each borehole consisted of retrievingthe split-spoon, opening it and classifying thesample by sediment type. The sample was thenscreened with an HNU photoionization detector. Aportion of each split-spoon was then placed in ajar and labeled with the sampling interval.Samples for VOC analysis were placed into jarsimmediately upon split-spoon retrieval. Fillingof the remaining jars followed subsequently. Thejars were then placed on the dashboard of theWarzyn sampling van and the heat was turned on.The samples were allowed to warm up for a periodof ten to twenty minutes before being screened asecond time with the HNU. Samples were collectedfrom each 2-foot interval and a composite samplewas prepared from each boring. The samplinginterval to be sent to the laboratory for chemicalanalysis was left to the discretion of the Warzynfield team leader.

FDDSl/a 19

SECTION 6.0MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION

6.1 Purpose

Monitoring wells were constructed to provide a means ofcollecting groundwater samples from varioushydrogeologic units in the study area. Groundwatersamples provide a means of assessing groundwaterquality and contaminant movement. Monitoring wells canalso be used in determining aquifer hydraulicparameters.

6.2 Well Locations

Eight monitoring wells were constructed, either singlyor as nests. Wells MW4 and MW5 were constructed assingle monitoring wells. Wells PI, MW1, P2, MW2, P3and MW3 were nested in groups of 2 wells. Wells PI,P2, and P3 act as piezometers. These wells werescreened in the next lower zone of relatively highpermeability. See Figure 6.2-1 for locations of wells.

6.3 Well Construction

6.3.1 Well Materials

Each monitoring well was constructed with 2-inchinside diameter, flush threaded PVC pipe and0.010-inch slotted PVC screen. Ten foot screenswere used for the five shallow wells(MW1,MW2,MW3,MW4 & MW5) and five foot screens wereused for the three deeper wells (PI, P2 & P3).The eight wells were completed with theinstallation of a sand pack around each screen,consisting of #30 flint sand. A 1-1/2 to 4 footbentonite pellet seal was emplaced above the sandpack on five of the eight wells. All wells werethen grouted to the surface with granularbentonite. Each well was fitted with a locking,steel protective casing. See Appendix A for acomplete chronology of well installation.

6.3.2 Installation Procedures

Boreholes were drilled using Diedrich B-50,Diedrich D-50, and CME-75 drill rigs. Eachborehole was drilled using hollow stem augers(HSA) with a wooden plug on the end. HSA flightswere 4-1/4 inch I.D. During the drillingprocedure, continuous soil sampling was conductedusing a stainless-steel split-spoon sampler. Eachsoil sample was collected using the same

FDDSl/a 20

SOUTH 27TH STREET

MONITORING HELL LOCATIONAND NUMBER

PIEZOMETER WELL LOCATIONAND NUMBER



FENCE

Figure 6.2-1

»ppoM*»flJo*TEfrft<l96 25389

LOCATIONS OF PHASE I UOMTOMNO WELLS

HORK PLANREMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDYFAOROWSK1 DRUM DISPOSAL SITEFRANKLlNj M1SCONSIN

procedures described in the Soil Boring DrillingProcedures, Section 5.3.2.


All riser pipes and screens were decontaminatedprior to installation in the boreholes. The wellstrings were steam cleaned with a portable steamgenerator unit. Steam cleaning was conducted at adesignated decontamination area located in thefill area of the site. Decontamination water wasdischarged directly to the ground. Decontaminatedwell strings were then wrapped in plastic sheetingfor transport to the borehole locations. Samplingutensils, such as stainless steel trays, bowls,spoons and split-spoon sampler were decontaminatedwith a TSP wash. All downhole tools, such asaugers, drill rods and bits were steam cleanedprior to each use. Drill rigs were decontaminatedwith the portable steam cleaner when they werebrought on and removed from the site.

FDDSl/a 22

SECTION 7.0MONITORING WELL DEVELOPMENT

7.1 Well Development

After well installation was completed, all eight wellswere developed by Warzyn personnel. Well developmentwas completed by bailing each well dry with adecontaminated teflon bailer and a dedicated length ofnylon rope. Plastic sheeting was placed around thewell to prevent the nylon rope from coming in contactwith the ground. All water collected from each wellwas collected and then discharged to the ground at thedecontamination area on the fill portion of the site.

7.2 Field Measurements

Warzyn personnel periodically measured and recordedwater level measurements in each well. Measurementswere made with an electric water level sounder.Between each well measurement, the probe was wiped offwith a paper towel.

During development of the wells, pH and conductivitywere not measured. Warzyn was not equipped with ameter to conduct these measurements. Therefore, thesewater quality indicators were not measured. Welldevelopment was considered complete after the wells hadbeen bailed dry a number of times.

FDDSl/a 23

SECTION 8.0GROUNDWATER SAMPLE COLLECTION

B.l Purpose

The monitoring wells and piezometers installed at theFadrowski site during the RI were sampled. Thesegroundwater samples were obtained to provide a means ofassessing groundwater quality and contaminant movement.Groundwater samples were collected by Warzyn fromJanuary 23, 1989 through January 26, 1989. M&Ecollected oversight samples of groundwater in order toestablish the agency's own data base. These data mayalso be used as a reference to check on the PRP's data.

8.2 Sampling Locations

Groundwater samples were collected from each of theeight monitoring wells and piezometers installed at theFadrowski site from December 12, 1988 through December30, 1988. These wells are designated as PI, MW1, P2,MW2, P3, MW3, MW4, and MW5. Their locations are shownon Figure 6.2-1.

8.3 Sample Collection Methods

8.3.1 Equipment

Groundwater samples were collected using adecontaminated stainless steel bailer and a nylonrope.

8.3.2 Sampling Procedures

Each of the eight (8) monitoring wells andpiezometers were purged of standing water in thewell until the wells were dry. The sample bottleswere filled after the wells were allowed torecharge. After sample collection, pH, specificconductivity and temperature were measured.

For each well, when sufficient volume wasavailable, two 40-ml glass vials were filled forvolatile organics analysis, followed by four 32-ounce glass amber bottles for extractableanalysis. Then, Warzyn subsequently filled one 1-liter polyethylene bottle for metals, one forcyanide, and one for chloride, sulfate, andalkalinity analyses.

Warzyn collected trip blanks, one field duplicate,one field blank, and one matrix spike/matrix spikeduplicate sample during this groundwater samplingactivity.

FDDSl/a 24

The trip blanks consisted of two 40-ml VOA vialsfilled with distilled water. These samplesaccompanied each cooler sent to HazeltonLaboratories containing samples for volatileorganics analysis. The trip blanks will only beanalyzed for volatile organic compounds.

The field duplicate was collected from MWl. Thissample was submitted for the full range ofanalyses. Three times the normal sample volumewas collected for volatile organics analysis atMW5. Two times the normal sample volume wascollected for extractable organics analysis atthis same well. The extra volumes will be used bythe laboratory for matrix spike/matrix spikeduplicate analyses. The matrix spike/duplicateanalysis is performed to give meaningful precisionand accuracy data in the actual sample matrix.

After collection, Warzyn stored their samples in acooler at 4'C. The VOA vials were filledcompletely with no air bubbles. The groundwatersamples collected for metals analysis were fieldfiltered and preserved with HN03 to a pH<2. Thesamples collected for cyanide analysis werepreserved with NaOH to a pH>12. Warzyn handdelivered their groundwater samples to thelaboratories on January 24th and 25th, 1989.Samples collected on January 26th were shipped viaFederal Express to their respective laboratories.The samples for volatile organics, extractablesand metals analysis were submitted to HazeltonLaboratories America of Madison, Wisconsin.Groundwater samples for cyanide, alkalinity,chloride, and sulfate analysis were submitted toWarzyn's Analytical Laboratory in Madison,Wisconsin.

Warzyn followed proper chain-of-custody,packaging, and shipping policies.


The bailer used for groundwater sampling wasdecontaminated in the following manner: 1)scrubbed with a soft-bristled brush in a trisodiumphosphate soap solution; 2) rinsed in tap water;3) acetone rinse; and 4) distilled water rinse.

FDDSl/a 25

8.4 Oversight Groundwater sample Collection

8.4.1 Oversight Sampling Locations

M&E collected an oversight sample from MW3. Thiswell was chosen because it was suspected of havingthe greatest potential for contamination. Fieldquality control samples were collected by M&E.These consisted of one field duplicate samplecollected from MW3, one field blank sampleconsisting of a rinsate from Warzyn's bailer, andone set of trip blanks accompanying the shipmentof the cooler containing samples for organicsanalyses. Extra sample volumes were collectedfrom MW3 for matrix spike/matrix spike duplicateanalysis.

8.4.2 Oversight Sample Collection Methods

Warzyn filled M&E's sample bottles alternatelywith theirs. Warzyn would first fill their VOAvials, then Warzyn filled M&E's VOA vials. Warzynsubsequently filled their sample bottles forextractables, metals, cyanide, chloride, sulfateand alkalinity analyses alternating with M&E'ssample bottles.

M&E's sample bottles consisted of two 40-ml glassvials for volatile organic compound analysis. Two80-ounce glass amber bottles for semi-volatileorganics and pesticide/PCBs analysis. M&E usedone 1-liter polyethylene bottles for each of thesamples collected for metals; cyanide; andchloride, alkalinity, and sulfate analyses. Thesesample bottles were supplied by the CLP samplebottle repository.

M&E's oversight samples were stored in coolers to4*C. Warzyn field filtered M&E's oversightsamples collected for metals analysis, andpreserved them with HN03 to a pH<2. Warzynpreserved M&E's oversight samples collected forcyanide analysis with NaOH to a pH>12. Theoversight samples collected were shipped viaFederal Express by M&E on January 24, 1989.

M&E's oversight samples collected for volatileorganic compounds and extractable analyses weresubmitted to Pace Laboratories Inc of Minneapolis,Minnesota. M&E shipped samples for metals andcyanide analyses to York Laboratories of Monroe,Connecticut. The oversight samples for chloride,alkalinity, and sulfate analyses were shipped to

FDDSl/a 26

Skinner & Sherman, Inc. of Waltham,Massachusettes. Proper chain-of-custody,packaging, and shipping protocol were followed.See Appendix D for sampling paperwork.

FDDSl/a 27

SECTION 9.0AQDIFER CHARACTERIZATION

9.1 Purpose

In order to gain an understanding of the hydrogeologyof the site, aquifer characteristics will be defined.This characterization of the aquifer will provide datato aid in the determination of transport processesoccurring at the site.

9.2 Methods

Water levels were monitored and recorded weekly duringthe field investigation. These data will be used todevelop a potentiometric map. Slug tests wereperformed on January 24th & 25th, 1989, to quantify thepermeability of the geologic deposits on site. Eachwell was slug tested after it had been allowed tostabilize following development. The slug test wasperformed by removing the water from the well until itwas nearly dry. Then, the changes in water level wererecorded after the water was removed from the well.

FDDSl/a 28

SECTION 10.0SUMMARY

10.1 Problems Encountered/Resolution

On December 7, 1988, no surface runoff from the fillarea along the south boundary of the site could befound to sample. Therefore, no surface water orsediment samples were collected from this location.Instead, a surface water and sediment sample wascollected from the cattail marsh at the base of thehill on the south side of the pond.

On December 8, 1988, the steam cleaner used fordecontamination of equipment does not produce steam.The steam cleaner was taken offsite to a shop forrepairs. The steam cleaner was repaired andoperational on December 9, 1988.

On December 9, 1988, the extreme cold weather causedthe gears on the drill rig to freeze. The gear box onthe rig was finally defrosted and the rig wasmobilized.

On December 9, 1988, the steam cleaner did not operateproperly. The steam cleaner was taken off site and anew one was brought on site.

On December 14, 1988, some hydraulic fluid from the righad spilled on the ground surface near the locationwhere MW1 was to be installed. The location for MW1was moved away from the spill. The soil at the spillwas shoveled up and placed on a plastic sheet fordisposal.

On December 15, 1988, the steam cleaner did notfunction properly. A new steam cleaner was rented.This new rental unit became frozen. Antifreeze wasused to defrost it. Some antifreeze spilled on theground in the decontamination area. A delay indrilling was experienced.

On December 16, 1988, the gear box on the drill rig hadbecome frozen again. The rig was eventually defrosted,causing a delay.

On December 20, 1988, rain and warm weather made fordifficult working conditions. The ground became toosoft to move the rig for soil boring collection. Workwas called off early, nothing was accomplished thatday.

FDDSl/a 29

On December 27, 1988, ETI representatives removed thetwo drill rigs from the site (after decontamination).Throughout the project, drill rigs were exchangedfrequently causing much lost drilling time. A largeamount of time was spent decontaminating drill rigs,mobilization and demobilization. This caused work toprogress slowly.

On December 29, 1988, the steam generator was notfunctioning properly. Additional warm-up time wasallowed to get it operational.

On December 30, 1988, a split-spoon sampler became bentand the tip was lost while retrieving a soil sample.ETI had a second split-spoon sampler in use. Thus,work progressed slowly because only one split-spoonsampler could be used. Later that afternoon, anothersplit-spoon sampler was located and used.

On January 3, 1989, Warzyn's HNU photoionizationdetecter was tested with a marker pen, and failed. TheHNU therefore, was not functioning properly. Warzynrepresentatives dismantled it and repaired it.

On January 3, 1989, ETI representatives accidentlyspilled 5-gallons of gasoline in the truck bed. Augersin truck bed were decontaminated. This caused a delayin sample collection.

On January 4, 1989, the Diedrich D-25 rig would notstart. The rig was taken off-site to the shop forrepairs. Repaired rig was not back on-site until nextday January 5, 1989.

On January 5, 1989, the Diedrich D-25 rig broke downagain. Rig was partially repaired on-site, augerswould turn, but not smoothly.

On January 23, 1989, the Warzyn representativeattempted to retrieve a teflon bailer which had beenaccidently dropped down MW1. The bailer was finallyretrieved on January 24, 1989 using a decontaminatedmetal hook tied to a string.

On January 24, 1989, during sample collection, MW3 wasbailed dry several times. Additional time was spent toallow the well to recharge.

On January 25, 1989, during sample collection, P3 wasbailed dry. Allowed additional time for well torecharge. However, at end of day, well was dry andsamples for cyanide and chloride, sulfate, andalkalinity still needed to be collected. Returned on

FDDSl/a 30

Janury 26, 1989 to complete sample collection at P3.Well was bailed dry after sample for cyanide analysiswas collected. By the end of the day, only one half ofthe sample volume (1/2-liter) for chloride, sulfate andalkalinity was collected. The Warzyn representativecontacted Warzyn's laboratory. Personnel from thelaboratory stated that this volume was sufficient toperform the analysis.

On January 25, 1989, a small quantity of acetone whichwas used for decontamination of equipment was noticedto be spilled on the ground at the decontaminationstation. Plastic sheeting was laid down over the areato prevent contact with the acetone.

10.2 Departures From the PRPs Work Plan

On December 2, 1988, a total of nine (9) test pits hadbeen excavated. The Work Plan states that up to four(4) trenches would be excavated. More than fourtrenches were excavated due to fact that equipment andpersonnel were mobilized on-site.

On December 7, 1988, a surface water and sedimentsample was not collected from the surface runoff fromthe fill area along the south boundary of the site. Nosurface runoff could be found at this location.Instead, a surface water and sediment sample wascollected from the cattail marsh at the base of thefill area south of the pond.

On December 13, 1988, PI was installed with a bentonitepellet seal measuring 2.5-feet in thickness. The WorkPlan states that bentonite pellet seals will be 2-feetthick.

On December 13, 1988, a five (5) foot screen wasinstalled in the borehole at PI. The Work Plan statesthat a two (2) foot screen would be installed in thepiezometers. Instead, five (5) foot screens will beinstalled. It was decided that the Work Plan was inerror.

On December 14, 1988, MW1 was installed withoutbentonite grout. Granular bentonite was poured intothe annulus above the bentonite seal. The Work Planstates that each well will be backfilled with bentonitegrout to a depth of 5-feet. Bentonite grout was notused due to the fact that the bentonite pellet seal wasemplaced to a depth of 5-feet.

FDDSl/a 31

On December 16, 1988, no bentonite pellet seal wasinstalled above the sand pack at MW2. Granularbentonite was emplaced from the top of the sand pack(5-foot depth) to the ground surface. The Work Planstates that a bentonite pellet seal will be emplacedabove the sandpack, and bentonite grout will beinstalled above the pellet seal with a 5-foot granularbentonite seal at the surface. Since the sandpack atMW2 extended to 5-feet below the ground surface, therewas no room for the pellet and grout seals.

On December 21, 1988, the soil boring collected at SB04only extended 4-feet below the ground surface. Theboring could not be extended due to resistant materialwhich was encountered. The Work Plan states that thesoil borings will be performed to a depth of 10-feet.

On December 23, 1988, the bentonite pellet sealinstalled at P3 was 4-feet thick. The Work Plan statesthat bentonite pellet seals will be 2-feet inthickness.

On December 23, 1988, the bentonite pellet sealinstalled at MW3 was 1.5 feet thick. The Work Planstates that bentonite pellet seals will be 2-feet inthickness.

On December 29, 1988, the locations of installation ofMW4 and MW5 were changed. MW4 was installed on thewest side of the pond and MW5 was installed at thesouthwest corner of the site. The Work Plan proposesthat MW4 would be installed on the northern boundary ofthe site on the east side of the fill area. The WorkPlan also proposed that MW5 be installed on the centralwestern boundary.

On December 29, 1988, no bentonite pellet seal orbentonite grout backfill was installed at MW4.Granular bentonite was installed from the top of thesand pack (4.7-foot depth) to the ground surface. Thegranular bentonite was emplaced above the sand to get a5-foot layer. The Work Plan states that a bentoniteseal and bentonite grout backfill would be installed to5-feet below the ground surface.

On December 29, 1988 no bentonite pellet seal orbentonite grout backfill was installed at MW5.Granular bentonite was installed from the top of thesandpack (3.8-foot depth) to the ground surface (seeexplanation at MW4 above).

FDDSl/a 32

On December 30, 1988, the soil boring collected at SB-13 only extended to 17-inches below ground surface.The auger was refused due to high resistance of buriedmaterial (possibly a concrete slab). The Work Planstates that borings would be extended 10-feet below theground surface. However, the site characterizationfrom the boring program is nearly complete due to largenumber of borings collected and consistency of samples.

On December 30, 1988, the soil boring at location SB-16was completed at a 7-foot depth due to resistanceencountered. The Work Plan states that soil boringswill extend to a 10-foot depth.

On January 5, 1989, the soil boring at location SB-23encountered resistance at a 2-foot depth. Boring wasnot advanced. The Work Plan states that soil boringswill extend to a 10-foot depth.

On January 23, 1989, while bailing the wells prior tosampling, Warzyn's specific conductivity meter wasmalfunctioning. Therefore, this water qualityindicator parameter could not be measured. However, pHand temperature were measured. The Work Plan statesthat upon sample collection, specific conductivity, pH,and temperature were to be measured.

On January 24, 1989, PI did not contain adequategroundwater volume for collection of samples for semi-volatile organics, pesticides/PCBs, metals, cyanide,chloride, sulfate, and alkalinity analyses. At Pi onlyenough sample volume was present for volatile organiccompound analysis. The Work Plan states that sampleswill be collected for full CLP HSL analyses. However,at PI a sample was collected for VOC analysis only.

On January 25, 1989, MW4 did not have enoughgroundwater volume for full HSL analyses, as stated inthe Work Plan. Therefore, sample was collected for VOCanalysis only.

FDDSl/a 33

APPENDIX A

CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS

FDDSl/tOC

CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS

The following is a chronology of monitoring well andpiezometer activities at Fadrowski Drum Disposal site fromDecember 12, 1988 to December 29, 1988. This description ofevents is presented in chronological order for each well.

Piezometer 1;

12-12-88 Borehole commenced with Diedrich Bombadier B-50 rig equipped with 4-1/4 inch Hollow StemAugers (HSA). Continuous split-spoon samplescollected to a 36-foot depth.

12-13-88 Continued extending borehole and continuoussample collection to a depth of 54-feet.Well string installed. Sand pack andbentonite pellet seal emplaced. Bentonitegrout pumped into annulus. Granularbentonite added up to the ground surface.Steel protective casing with locking capinstalled.

P-l Installation Dimensions:

Boring depth = 53.72 feetScreened interval = 53.0 - 48.0 feetSand pack = 53.72 - 46.0 feetBentonite seal = 46.0 - 43.5 feetGrout = 43.5 - 5.0 feetGranular Bentonite = 5.0 - 0.0 feetRiser pipe = 2-inch diameter, PVCScreen = 2-inch diameter, PVC, 0.010-inch slotCap = PVC, unventedProtective casing = 4-inch diameter with locking

cap

Monitoring Well 1;

12-14-88 Borehole commenced with Diedrich Bombadier B-50 rig equipped with 4-1/4 inch HSA. Nosamples collected. Borehole drilled to adepth of 20.3 feet. Well string installed.Sand pack and bentonite pellet seal emplaced.Granular bentonite installed to groundsurface. Steel protective casing withlocking cap installed.

FDDS1/B A-l

MW-1 Installation Dimensions:

Boring depth = 20.3 feetScreened interval = 19.0 - 9.0 feetSand pack = 20.3 - 7.0 feetBentonite seal = 7.0 - 5.0 feetGranular Bentonite = 5.0 - 0.0 feetRiser pipe = 2-inch diameter, PVCScreen = 2-inch diameter, PVC, 0.010-inch slotCap = PVC, unventedProtective casing = 4-inch diameter with locking

cap

Piezometer 2:

12-15-88 Borehole commenced with Diedrich B-50 rigequipped with 4-1/4 inch HSA. Continuoussplit-spoon samples were collected from 0 -10 foot depth. Split-spoon samples were thencollected at 5-foot intervals from 10 - 47.5foot depth. Well string installed. Sandpack and bentonite pellets emplaced.Bentonite grout pumped into borehole.Granular bentonite installed to groundsurface. Steel protective casing withlocking cap installed.

P-2 Installation Dimensions:

Boring depth =47.5 feetScreened interval = 45.5 - 40.5 feetSand pack = 47.5 - 36.0 feetBentonite seal = 36.0 - 33.5 feetGrout = 33.5 - 3.0 feetGranular Bentonite = 3.0 - 0.0 feetRiser pipe = 2-inch diameter, PVCScreen = 2-inch diameter, PVC, 0.010-inch slotCap = PVC, unventedProtective casing = 4-inch diameter with locking

cap

Monitoring Well 2;

12-16-88 Borehole commenced with Diedrich B-50 rigequipped with 4-1/4 inch HSA. No samplescollected. Borehole drilled to 20.4-footdepth. Well string installed. Sand packinstalled and granular bentonite installed toground surface. Steel protective casing withlocking cap installed.

FDDS1/B A-2


Boring depth =20.4 feetScreened interval = 18.5 - 8.5 feetSand pack = 20.4 - 5.0 feetGranular Bentonite = 5.0 - 0.0 feetRiser pipe = 2-inch diameter, PVCScreen = 2-inch diameter, PVC, 0.010-inch slotCap = PVC, unventedProtective casing = 4-inch diameter with locking

cap

Piezometer 3:

12-22-88 Borehole drilled with Diedrich D-50 drill rigequipped with 4-1/4 inch HSA to a depth of46-feet. Split-spoon samples were collectedat 5-foot intervals.

12-23-88 Well string installed. Sand pack andbentonite pellet seal emplaced. Bentonitegrout pumped into annulus. Granularbentonite installed up to ground surface.Steel protective casing with locking capinstalled.

P-3 Installation Dimensions:

Boring depth = 46.5 feetScreened interval = 46.5 - 41.5 feetSand pack = 46.5 - 38.0 feetBentonite seal = 38.0 - 34.0 feetGrout = 34.0 - 4.0 feetGranular Bentonite = 4.0 - 0.0 feetRiser pipe = 2-inch diameter, PVCScreen = 2-inch diameter, PVC, 0.010-inch slotCap = PVC, unventedProtective casing = 4-inch diameter with locking

cap

Monitoring Well 3;

12-23-88 Borehole drilled with Diedrich D-50 equippedwith 4-1/4 inch HSA. No samples werecollected. Well string installed. Sand packand bentonite pellet seal emplaced. Granularbentonite installed up to ground surface.Steel protective casing with locking capinstalled.

FDDS1/B A-3


Boring depth = 16.0 feetScreened interval = 15.5 - 5.5 feetSand pack = 16.0 - 4.5 feetBentonite seal = 4.5 - 3.0 feetGranular Bentonite = 3.0 - 0.0 feetRiser pipe = 2-inch diameter, PVCScreen = 2-inch diameter, PVC, 0.010-inch slotCap = PVC, unventedProtective casing = 4-inch diameter with locking

cap

Monitoring Well 4;

12-29-88 Borehole drilled with 4-1/4 inch HSA.Continuous split-spoon samples collected.Well string installed. Sand pack andgranular bentonite emplaced. Steelprotective casing with locking cap installed.


Boring depth = 16.0 feetScreened interval = 16.0 - 6.0 feetSand pack = 16.0 - 4.7 feetGranular Bentonite = 4.7 - 0.0 feetRiser pipe = 2-inch diameter, PVCScreen = 2-inch diameter, PVC, 0.010-inch slotCap = PVC, unventedProtective casing = 4-inch diameter with locking

cap

Monitoring Well 5;

12-29-88 Borehole drilled with 4-1/4 inch HSA.Continuous split spoon samples collected.Well string installed. Sand pack andgranular bentonite emplaced. Steelprotective casing with locking cap installed.


Boring depth = 16.0 feetScreened interval = 15.0 - 5.0 feetSand pack = 16.0 - 3.8 feetGranular Bentonite = 3.8 - 0.0 feetRiser pipe = 2-inch diameter, PVCScreen = 2-inch diameter, PVC, 0.010-inch slotCap = PVC, unventedProtective casing = 4-inch diameter with locking

cap

FDDS1/B A-4

APPENDIX B

PHOTO LOG

FDDSl/toc

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:

Photographer:Camera:Film:Date:Time:

Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WINorthK. KruegerifTCCannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/1/880945 hrs

Test Pit #3 (TP03) - Area(7 drums found).

of slope in fill

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WIDownK. KruegerKKCannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/1/881015 hrs

Test Pit #3 (TP03) - Yellow resin-like materialcoining from decaying drum.

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WIN-NWK. KruegerkXCannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/1/881030 hrs

Test Pit #3 (TP03) - North end of pit.

t

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WISouthK. KruegerKfCCannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/1/881035 hrs

Test Pit #3 (TP03) - Looking into pit frombottom of slope.

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WISEK. Kruegeryv^Cannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/1/881040 hrs

Test Pit #3 (TP03) - Surveying soil in backhoebucket with HNU meter.

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WISWK. Krueger «Cannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/1/881100 hrs

Test Pit #3 (TP03) - ide angle shot of landfilland backhoe on the slope.

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:

Photographer:Camera:

Film:Date:Time:

Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WIDownK. Kruegerv<KCannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/1/881215 hrs

Tost Pit #4 (TP04) - Looking into bottom of pit.

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


Looking back at the generalPit #3 after refilling.

location Test

8Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WISEK. Kruegerfc^Cannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/1/881230 hrs

Test Pit #4 (TP04) - Photo taken on fillmaterial (slope) n'ear TP03.

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


Film:Date:Time:

Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WINorthK. Krueger K/CCannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/1/881300 hrs

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


10Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WINEK. Krueger <XCannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/1/881330 hrs

Test Pit #4 (TP04) in background.

^*;' %ib&%$&*ffim$m

Photo No.: 11Facility: Fadrowski Drum

DisposalLocation: Franklin, WIDirection: NE

Photographer: K. KruegerCamera: Cannon T-70Film: Kodak ASA 200Date: 12/1/88Time: 1415 hrs

Test Pit #5 (TP05) on top of fill, southern edgeof property.

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


Film:Date:Time:

12Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WINEK. Krueger KCannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/1/881430 hrs

Test Pit #5 (TP05) -'surveying soil in backhoebucket with HNU meter.

Photo No. :Facility:

Location:Direction:


13Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WIDownK. Krueger K^Cannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/1/881500 hrs

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:

hotographer:Camera:Film:Date:Time:

14Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WIEastK. Krueger/<KCannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/1/881515 hrs

Test Pit #5 (TP05) - Concrete and rebar excavatedfrom hole.

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


15Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WISEK. Krueger K<Cannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/1/881520 hrs

Test Pit #5 (TP05) - Soil sample collection.

Test

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


16Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WIDownK. KruegerKXCannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/2/880900 hrs

pit.

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


Film:Date:Time:

17Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WIN-NEK. KruegerCannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/2/880910 hrs

Test Pit #6 (TP06) - Concrete and rebarexcavated from pit.

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:

hotographer:Camera:Film:Date:Time:

18Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WIWestK. Krueger KKCannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/2/881055 hrs

Test Pit #7 (TP07) - In area of piles ofdebris in fill on slope above pond.

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:

Photographer;Camera:Film:Date:Time:

19Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WINWK. KruegerKt(Cannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/2/881100 hrs

Test Pit #7 (TP07)in pit.

- Concrete block and fill

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


Film:Date:Time:

20Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WIDownK. KruegerKKCannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/2/881335 hrs

Test Kit f8 (TP08) - Soil sample collection.

» * *

&£$&£j *s, .jj^ <"V -*• .fc ^f\

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:

,Photographer:Camera:Film:Date:Time:

21Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WINWK. KruegerCannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/2/881340 hrs

Test Pit #8 (TP08) located Northeast of TP07;all natural materials (till/clay).

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


22Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WINorthK. Krueger tf/(Cannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/2/881410 hrs

Test Pit #9 (TP09) located perpendicular oneast side of TP03.

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


Film:Date:Time:

23Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WIDownK. Krueger(<KCannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/2/881435 hrs

Test Pit #9 (TP09)i n this pit.

- Five (5) drums are found

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


24Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WIDownK. Krueger [<KCannon T-70Kodak ASA 20'12/2/881440 hrs

Test Pit #9 (TP09) - Partially exposed drums,

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


Film:Date:Time:

25Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WINorthK. Krueger|<!<Cannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/2/881445 hrs

Test Pit #9 (TP09) - Drums in pit,

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


Film:Date:Time:

26Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WINEK. Krueger K<Cannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/6/88Afternoon

Decon station with sampling equipment.

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


27Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WINAK. Krueger tf<Cannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/6/881435 hrs

Collection of surface water sample(SW01) downstream.

Location of surface water and sedimentsamples SW03 and SD03 from the East-Central shore of Borrows Pond.

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


Film:Date:Time:

28Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WIDownK. KruegerCannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/7/881030 hrs

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:

Photographer:Camera;

Film:Date:Time:

29Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WIE-NEK. KruegerCannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/7/881120 hrs

Areas of drainage in.central marsh wheresamples SW04 and SD04 were collected.

Photo No.: 30Facility: Fadrowski Drum

DisposalLocation: Franklin, WIDirection: Down

Photographer: K. Krueger «j<Camera: Cannon T-70Film: Kodak ASA 200Date: 12/7/88Time: 1120 hrs

Collection of surface water sample SW04.

8? C

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


31Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WIDownK. Krueger KCannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/7/881405 hrs

Collection of sediment sample SD04 using astainless steel core sampler.

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


Sauiple SD04 in stainless steel bowl.

32Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WIDownK. Krueger K^Cannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/7/881405 hrs

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


33Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WIDownK. Krueger j K.Cannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/7/881405 hrs

jinpositing sediment .sample SD04 andplacement of sample into 8 oz. jars.

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


Film:Date:Time:

34Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WIDownK. Krueger{<KCannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/12/88Afternoon

Split spoon sample from piezometer Well PI.

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


35Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WINWK. KruegerKXCannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/13/88Afternoon

Well PI in place.

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


36Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WIWestK. Krueger «VCannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/13/88Afternoon

Drill rig at Well PI,

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:

[Photographer:Camera:Film:Date:Time:

37Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WINWK. Krueger \(KCannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/13/88Late Afternoon

lixing Bentonite slurry for Well PI.

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction;


Film;Date;Time;

38Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WIEastK. Krueger J<KCannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/14/88Afternoon

4.25" HSA being removed from monitoringWell 1 (MW1).

Photo No.;Facility:

Location;Direction;

Photographer;Camera:

Film:Date:Time:

39Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WINWK. Krueger H'Cannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/14/88Afternoon

Piezometer PI on left and monitoring WellMW1 on right. Completed with locked casing.

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


Film:Date:Time:

40Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WISouthK. KruegerCannon T-70Kodak ASA12/15/88Afternoon

Installation of PVC Well P2.

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


Film:Date;Time:

41Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WIS-SEK. Krueger K^Cannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/15/88Late Afternoon

Drillersfor Well

removingP2.

augers from borehole

Photo No.:Facility:

rLocation:Direction:


Film:Date:Time:

42Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WINEK. KruegerCannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/16/88Morning

Monitoring Well MW2 on right and piezometerWell P2 on loft.

Checking physical characteristics of soilat soil boring SB01.

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


Film:Date:Time:

43Fadrowski DrimDisposalFranklin, WINEK. Krueger K^Cannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/19/88Morning

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


Film:Date:Time:

44Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WINWK. Krueger/(XCannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/19/88Morning

Soil boring SB01 or SB02 being drilledwith 2.25" HSA.

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:

hotographer:Camera:

Film;Date:Time:

45Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WIN-NWK. Krueger t<t<Cannon T-70Kodak ASA 20012/19/88Afternoon

Decon station used to decon split spoons,

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


46Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin,NEG. KrugerNikon One TouchKodak ASA 10012/29/880935 hrs

WI

k

Collection of steam cleaner wash water.

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


47Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WIWestG.Nikon One TouchKodak ASA 10012/29/881325 hrs

Drill rig (center) over MW4 location.

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


Film:Date:Time:

48Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WINorthG. KrugerNikon One Touc1

Kodak ASA 10012/30/880930 hrs

Monitoring Well MW4.

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


49Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WINEG. KrugerNikon One TouchKodak ASA12/30/880930 hrs

100

Monitoring Well MW5,

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


Soil boring location SB16. Note the closeproximity of this boring to the storm sewermanhole (background).

50Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WINEG. KrugerNikon One TouchKodak ASA 10012/30/881540 hrs

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


51Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WI

G. KrugerNikon One TouchKodak ASA 10012/30/881540 hrs

Soil boring SB17

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


52Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WINE ; .„C. Meyer (.' >"Nikon One Toucv-Kodak ASA 1001/23/891510 hrs

Wells PI and MW1 during bail down test.

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


Film:Date:Time:

53Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WIWestC. Meyer / 'r'~Nikon One TouchKodak ASA 1001/24/891115 hrs

Bailing MW1 dry for aquifer response test.

Photo No.:Facility:

Location:Direction:


54Fadrowski DrumDisposalFranklin, WIWest , ,C. Meyer t'' '/>Nikon One TouchKodak ASA 1001/24/881120 hrs

Aquifer response test at MW1.

APPENDIX C

FIELD LOG

FDDSl/tOC

APPENDIX D

OVERSIGHT SAMPLING PAPERWORK

FDDSl/tOC

CASE NUMBEM/3AS No.

O/-MVII ui <MIM ULI Ult l

iivICo

THIS FORM IS TO BE USED FOR SAMPLES SENT TO CONTRACT ONLY^

RITE NAME I AHnpATOHY ~>x'-Y - Yt'i'i'. fff>JCc't L

SUPCftFUNO DO NUMBER. .f fA HPM or OSC |5 M S I/ICE81 U/'hi I P

DATE SHIPPED.

PAGE . .OF.

ACTIVITY NUMBER

CRL LOGNUMBER

fflJ&OjSf/

ti9J~60rffz,fl<?jrc-t/te$ft <?T6oj$9/

0?J&>/5$7SlUOiSZZ.ftlWltfl

ORGANICTRAFFICREPORTNUMBER

cSAS Pack)

£CMO 1ecno?-£C*00£1781

^^7(-oiLffl7£-OL

yy/ff-o^•

INORGANICTRAFFICREPORTNUMBER

rng List No.

MtYlb IH6V&1

M 6111*0

••

•_

ACIO

«A

Sf

MU

TUA

L c^

os

0"C

AM

C S

CA

N

UO

L

T

O«

!TS

7<

XxxIv

OlA

TH

i O

'CA

MC

AN

AL

YS

ISO

'CA

NIC

SC

AM

UC

L

TQ

II7144

xxXx

IWA

TI*

*O

LY

Cm

,O<

»N

AT

fOW

«*H

NY

J

UC

L

*tS

171*4

xx><

WATER OR LIQUIDS

^

o f

xxX

t* ;

f

3

i 5

i;

I ?

XxX

NIT

ftA

Tf

NIT

MIT

I

MO

-X.

MIN

I

.

O j

\ \

•

2tv

9VI 1«•* 1•c t-

5

i oI *VI 1

I

xXX

1 X

'-• C

o" ;

'o X

xxx

SfOIMFNISm SOUS

AC

ID IA

SI

Nlu

TD

AL

C'O

SO

RG

AN

IC S

CA

NM

G

«G

T

n»

7H

77

5

vO^A

litt

O*C

AM

I<:

AN

ALY

SIS

O«C

AN

IC S

CA

NM

G

*G

T

O«

J1

*«5

7 n

iO1. 1

u»%

n

'i

o

t/>. !•

•1

o '

g2

f 4

O

2 <

,

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYOffice of Enforcement

CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD

REGION B230 South Dearborn Straot

Chicago. Illinois 60604

PROJ NO. PROJECT NAME

SAMPLERS:

STA. NO. DATE TIME STATION LOCATION

NO.

OF

CON-

TAINERS

(*/)SLAJt>-

REMARKS

X X / 3 -evLX MtJ 7 MA HI* z > X

V XXYx 5"-/j:

M 2 x Mi,//.';' /S 5'- /

X 9 7? 7 £CM<%>

x X 5"- / £cit<jo55- V V T6I X

Relinquished by: {Signitunl Date / Time Received by: (Sign* tun I Relinquished by: (Signtturt) Date / Time Received by:

Relinquished by: ISigntturtl Date / Time Received by: (Signtturt 1 Relinquished by: ISign»tvr»> Data / Time Received by: K*n»tun)

Relinquished by: ISigntwn) Date / Time Received for Laboratory by:ISign»lur»l

Date /Time

Distribution White — Accompanies Shipment; Pink — Coordinator Field Files, Yellow — Laboratory File

Remarks

/7?.)f^

c - 1 one



REGION 6230 South Dearborn Street


PROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME

SAMPLERS: ISignttuml .

• -


NO.

OF

CON-TAINERS

REMARKS

HU X,X ,U uJ &<#/'?-> 3? , / r

/.-: a t r-

Relinquished by: ISignnurtl Date / Time Received by: ISigruwrtl Relinquished by: (Signtturtl Date /Time Received by: (5>tnttunl

Relinquished by: ISignttunl Date /Time Received by: ISigntturtl Relinquished by: ISifntwrti Data /Time Received by: (&tMtun)

Relinquished by: ISigniturtl Date /Time Received for Laboratory by:(Signttuftt

Date /Time

Distribution: White — Accompanies Shipment; Pink — Coordinator Field Files. Yellow — Laboratory File

Remarks

_ 1



REGION 6230 South Dearborn Street


PROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME

SAMPLERS: (Sigrutunl


NO

OF

CON-TAINERS

REMARKS

tint X •*//r-i*f79ok UlJ

•Mfl y £'£ / XX

If

Relinquished by: (Signttun) Date/Time Received by: ISigmtunt Relinquished by : tSigmturil Date /Time Received by:

Relinquished by: iSignttun) Date / Time Received by: (Signtturt 1 Relinquished by: ISign»mrt> Data /Time Received by: IS+mtvrt)

Relinquished by: tsigmturt) Date /Time Received for Laboratory by:ISigntturt)

Date /Time

Distribution: White — Accompanies Shipment; Pink — Coordinator Field Files. Yellow — Laboratory File

Remarks z>, ' ''•"'<• °100

/ I f. i a '• sx c/ // -

' 1 Q H C C

USEPA CONTRACT LABORATORY PROGRAMSAMPLE MANAGEMENT OFFICEP.O BOX 818 ALEXANDRIA. VA 22313703/5572490 FTS 557 2490

1 APPLICABLE)

ORGANIC TRAFFIC REPORT(FOR CLP USE ONLY I

TYPE OF ACTIVITY (CIRCLE ONE) Q)

SUPERFUND—PA SI ESI RIFS RD RA EHNPLD O*M OTHEFUufcui/

NOiijijfTnnifin r:', \ T .T frtmt\f\M

SITE NAME:

CITY. STATE: SITE SPILL 10:

REGION NO: SAMPLING COMPANY

SAMPLER: (NAME)

ATTN:

SAMPLING DATE:

QfaiH/Z'/ •*+! END,

DATE SHIPPED:

AIRBILL NO: 9O /',

. CARRIER:

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION(ENTER IN BOX A) 4. SOIL1. SURFACE WATER 5. SEDIMENT'f*GROUND WATER 6. OIL (SAS)3. LEACHATE 7. WASTE (SAS)

TRIPLE VOLUME REQUIRED FOR MATRIXSPIKE/DUPLICATE AQUEOUS SAMPLE

SHIP MEDIUM AND HIGH CONCENTRATIONSAMPLES IN PAINT CANS

SEE REVERSE FOR ADDITIONALINSTRUCTIONS

CLPSAMPLENUMBER

(FROM LABELS)

/> i..

L-L

RASANALYSIS

v

V

OSPECIAL

HANDLINGSTATION

LOCATION

< .•— ->

EPA Form 2075-7 (•-»?)

WHITE - SMO COPY PINK - CUENT COPY WHITE — LAB COPY FOR RETURN TO SMO YELLOW — LAB COPY

USEPA CONTRACT LABORATORY PROGRAMSAMPLE MANAGEMENT OFFICEP.O BOX BIB ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313703/557*490 FTS-557 2490

CASE NO. U2BB SAS NO:(IF APPLICABLE)

INORGANIC TRAFFIC REPORT(FOR CLP USE ONLY)

TYPE OF ACTIVITY (CIRCLE ONE) (J)

SUPERFUND—PA SI ESI RIFS RD RA ERNPLD O&M OTHER 8X£Btl

NON-SUPERFUND— PROGRAM

SITE NAME:

CITY, STATE: SITE SPILL ID:

REGION NO:

\ySAMPLING COMPANY

A/A'-SAMPLER: (NAME)

Co

SHIP TO:

SAMPLING DATE:

BEGIN:

DATE SHIPPED:

AIRBILL NO:

CARRIER:

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION(ENTER IN BOX A) 4 SOIL1. SURFACE WATER 5. SEDIMENT2. GROUND WATER 6. OIL (SAS)3. LEACHATE 7. WASTE (SAS)

<E9

DOUBLE VOLUME REQUIRED FOR MATRIXSPIKE/DUPLICATE AQUEOUS SAMPLE

SHIP MEDIUM AND HIGH CONCENTRATIONSAMPLES IN PAINT CANS

SEE REVERSE FOR ADDITIONALINSTRUCTIONS

CLPSAMPLENUMBER

(FROM LABELS)

®

Itk

®HAS

ANALYSIS

A AXX

HIGHONLY(SAS)

SPECIALHANDLING

STATIONLOCATION

EPA Form 2075-* (•-•?)

WHITE — SMO COPY PINK — CUENT COPY WHITE -.LAB COPY FOR RETURN YELLOW — LAB COPY

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.LP Sample Management Office.O. Box 818 - Alexandria, Virginia 22313

Phone: 703/557-2490 - FTS/557-2490

SPECIAL ANALYTICAL SERVICE

PACKING LIST

SAS Number

sampling Office:

Mc-rttkf + rt>t.>s

Sampling Contact:

( t ' < . ' . - :(name)

''- : K:;"^- /(phone)

Sampling Date(s):

//>.//*>?1 ^ /

Date Shipped:

i/zi//*f

Site Name/Code:

Qtr&oi

Ship To: ^kifJUCe " WltM.jZ

520 2"* Ai/c-iJALrHsitfj tffl&

ez-z^i

Attn: M^lL^fJ £&iJ$6cA

'f For Lab Use Only

Date Samples Rec'd:

Received By:

1.2.

3.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

11.

12.

13.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

SampleNumbers

-•:'• 6' -o/

Sample Descriptioni.e., Analysis, Matrix, Concentration

/ > /.y Z..' f/'l'C'r'

//y c -s'i-.-! //

Sample Condition onReceipt at Lab

j— ./!L • /,; .•/.••/?-^ L&;>J Lk'Sft-

For Lab Use Only

White - SMO Copy, Yellow - Region Copy, Pink - Lab Copy for return to SMO, Gold - Lab Copy

Documents

FIELD ACTIVITY MONITORING REPORT - RI/FS OVERSIGHT · SECTION 3.0 SECTION 4.0 SECTION 5.0 SECTION 6.0 SECTION 7.0 Introduction 1.1 Scope of Work ... This activity was assigned under