Upload
jodie
View
34
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
FF magnets pre-isolator & experimental set-up proposal. 2nd WG5 Meeting. F. Ramos, A. Gaddi, H. Gerwig, N. Siegrist. April 20, 2010. Objective. Stabilize FF magnets to: 0.1 nm RMS @ 4 Hz Using an integrated approach: - passive pre-isolator - active mechanical stabilization - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
FF magnets pre-isolator & experimental set-up proposal2nd WG5 Meeting
F. Ramos, A. Gaddi, H. Gerwig, N. Siegrist
April 20, 2010
Objective
Stabilize FF magnets to:
0.1 nm RMS @ 4 Hz
Using an integrated approach:
- passive pre-isolator- active mechanical stabilization
- beam-based stabilization
1
Pre-isolator – How does it work?
Low dynamic stiffness mounts
(nat. frequency around 1 Hz)
Acts as a low-pass filter for the ground motion
Large mass
(50 to 200 ton)
Provides the inertia necessary to withstand the external disturbances (air flow, acoustic pressure, etc.)
+
2
How can it be accomplished?
Drawings by N. Siegrist*Conceptual design 3
How can it be accomplished?
QF1
QD0
MassMount
Walk-on-floor
QD0 support
tube
*Conceptual design 4
“State of the art” exampleVibration isolation system at the
Centre for Metrology and Accreditation – Helsinki, Finland
4 independent seismic masses (3x70 ton + 1x140 ton)
0.8 Hz pneumatic vibration isolators(“air springs”)
*Infos provided by 5
“State of the art” exampleProvided measurement data
Transmissibility
10x
Vertical displacements
1 Hz
@Ground
@Mass
Note: Ground motion noise level below CMS measurements (A. Kuzmin – EDMS 1027459)
*Infos provided by 6
Experimental set-up – Why?
How will it react to different noise sources?
We need tounequivocally demonstrate that the concept can work
Is the system’s performance amplitude dependant?
What about energy loss mechanisms (friction...)?What performance can we expect?
And air blows?
There are lot of unanswered questions.
The previous example is promising, but...
7
Experimental set-up – How?It needs to be:
Simple to design/build/assembleEasy to “debug” & tune
Cheap
Proposal:
40 ton masssupported by
4 structural beams8
Experimental set-up – How?
Drawings by N. Siegrist 9
Experimental set-up – Design
Design criterias:High deformations (i.e. low bending stiffness)
Acceptable stressesShape optimization
Average stress: <280 MPaDeformation: 187 mm
10
Experimental set-up – PerformancePerformance in ideal conditions (ground motion only)
Transmissibility Displacement P.S.D.
1.55 Hz@CMS
@Pre-isolator
Integrated R.M.S. Displacement
2.2nm @CMS
0.15 nm @Pre-isolator
15xGround Motion
Displacement @Pre-isolator
11
Experimental set-up – Measurements
At least 3 seismometers/geophonesSynchronous measurements
Help needed for the measurements
Reference 1 Reference 2
Measure
~10 m
A set-up like the one below is foreseen
12
Summary• A passive low-frequency pre-isolator has been proposed as a support for the FF magnets;
• This pre-isolator will constitute the first “layer” of the stabilization chain;
• This concept has already been used in other facilities;
• Experimental tests should be performed to understand how the system behaves in “real life” conditions (no simulation can, accurately, take into account all these effects);
• A simple and relatively inexpensive experimental set-up has been conceived and proposed.
13