5
Sam Krausz SOC-1002 December 1, 2014 Ferguson: Is Anyone Right? #HandsUpDontShoot #BlackLivesMatter The two hashtags above represent the two largest points of controversy in the United States right now. Not the fact that those are true statements that we should be working toward – that is true - but whether or not the context for the argument is appropriate. What we all know about the Ferguson case of Michael Brown is that he robbed Ferguson Market and Liquor by overpowering the store owner, was told directly afterward by a police officer named Darren Wilson to step off of the street and get on the sidewalk, then a struggle of some sort went on between Wilson and Brown wherein Brown was at some point in the front seat section of Wilson’s police vehicle and unarmed at all times, and then Brown’s body was found in the middle of the street four and a half hours after being shot by Wilson six times in the arm, chest, and front of the head. Besides that, what does anyone in the general public actually know? The amount of tangible educated-opinion-forming fact readily available to the public is about enough to fill a tablespoon. Because of the muddy nature of the Michael Brown incident in Ferguson, Missouri, the protests taking place in St. Louis and across the country could either be every bit as meaningful as they are aiming to be, or one of the largest ironies that the United States has seen in quite some time. A Meaningful and Needed Protest If some of the eyewitness accounts of the incident are found to be true and Michael Brown was actually killed in an unjust way by Darren Wilson, then these protests are exactly what America needs to listen to and take heed of. One of the facts that we know about this incident was

Ferguson Paper

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

A sociological paper on the Happenings of the Michael Brown incident in Ferguson.

Citation preview

  • Sam Krausz

    SOC-1002

    December 1, 2014

    Ferguson: Is Anyone Right?

    #HandsUpDontShoot

    #BlackLivesMatter

    The two hashtags above represent the two largest points of controversy in the United

    States right now. Not the fact that those are true statements that we should be working toward

    that is true - but whether or not the context for the argument is appropriate. What we all know

    about the Ferguson case of Michael Brown is that he robbed Ferguson Market and Liquor by

    overpowering the store owner, was told directly afterward by a police officer named Darren

    Wilson to step off of the street and get on the sidewalk, then a struggle of some sort went on

    between Wilson and Brown wherein Brown was at some point in the front seat section of Wilsons

    police vehicle and unarmed at all times, and then Browns body was found in the middle of the

    street four and a half hours after being shot by Wilson six times in the arm, chest, and front of the

    head. Besides that, what does anyone in the general public actually know? The amount of tangible

    educated-opinion-forming fact readily available to the public is about enough to fill a tablespoon.

    Because of the muddy nature of the Michael Brown incident in Ferguson, Missouri, the protests

    taking place in St. Louis and across the country could either be every bit as meaningful as they are

    aiming to be, or one of the largest ironies that the United States has seen in quite some time.

    A Meaningful and Needed Protest

    If some of the eyewitness accounts of the incident are found to be true and Michael Brown

    was actually killed in an unjust way by Darren Wilson, then these protests are exactly what

    America needs to listen to and take heed of. One of the facts that we know about this incident was

  • that Browns body lay on the ground in the glaring sun for four and a half hours. Of that, we all can

    be assured that someone made a bad move somewhere. EMTs should have been on scene in less

    than an hour, no excuses.

    This has been a large part of the peaceful protests that have gone on throughout the city,

    especially at the St. Louis Galleria, which lies five minutes away from my house, where Black

    Friday was shut down at 2pm because of the protestors Die-ins, which means that large groups of

    them would lay down all over the floor for four and a half minutes at a time to signify the four and a

    half hours that Browns body lay dead on the street. Truthfully, no matter the situation, county

    services should have at least acted like they cared about a black mans body lying in the street.

    Browns life matters. Black lives matter. This sentiment can also be transferred to the incident

    itself. Wilson should have at least acted like Browns life mattered by not shooting his unarmed

    person six times, especially because according to some eyewitness accounts Brown had his

    hands up in a gesture of surrender when Wilson shot him. That circulated story sparked the

    hashtags that begin this essay. Those hashtags need to be heard. There is without a doubt a

    concentration of people in the country who do not see the fallacies of our law enforcement system

    and who see minorities as lesser to themselves, and those ignorant people must come to see the

    logistical problems with their viewpoints and change their sentiments appropriately if this country

    can ever hope to eradicate unjust social inequality.

    A Dreadful Irony

    If the evidence of the incident matches up with Darren Wilsons personal account of the

    situation just as the jury has (arguably) already ruled it does, then the protests and riots trying to

    avenge Michael Browns death are not just meaningless, but they radiate irony. One of the facts that

    we know about this incident, and that we have photo evidence to prove, is that Michael Brown

    robbed Ferguson Market and Liquor by overpowering the storeowner before coming into contact

  • with Darren Wilson. This sheds a negative light on this entire situation for the Brown side of the

    argument in two ways: 1. If Brown was stupid enough to rob a convenience store for cigarillos and

    use his truly imposing size to overpower the owner of that store without any attempt to hide his

    identity to the video cameras, then talking back to and instigating a stupid fight with a scrawny cop

    is not such a far-fetched possibility. 2. The rioters made complete idiots of themselves by looting

    and trashing the very convenience store where the only proof of Michael Browns wrongdoing was

    fully present. A powerful video of the storeowner standing in his wrecked lifes work after a night

    of looting shows its audience the most cheated and defeated man in this whole mess. This man is

    the perfect example of why violence and rioting is never the answer: because innocent fellow

    citizens lives are ruined for the sake of ignorant rage. But I will turn my attention away from the

    rioting, as that can be dismissed as a shameful act of instigation by Michael Browns stepfather when

    he jumped on top of a car and shouted Lets burn this b**** to the ground! and by the multitude

    of national media trucks that showed up to St. Louis with the expectation of a good show.

    Now peaceful protests have taken over from the rioting, and with it, chants of the two

    hashtags found at the beginning of this essay. These groups are denouncing police brutality by

    saying Hands up, dont shoot! and denouncing institutionalized racism by saying Black Lives

    Matter. Again, I would like to state that I agree with these statements to the fullest extent, but if

    the case of Michael Brown actually transpired in the way that Darren Wilson described it, a way

    that does not contradict any of the evidence currently available to the general public, then this is the

    wrong case after which to be protesting for these ideals. According to Wilson, Brown initiated a

    brawl with him, climbed into his car, tried to steal his weapon from him, insulted his masculinity

    by betting Wilson that he would not shoot, then ran away from the car with Wilson following him

    just as any cop is trained to do. Brown turned after Wilson yelled after him, put one of his hands

    into his waistline as if possibly reaching for a concealed weapon, and started charging Wilson, who

  • then fired two warning shots before shooting Brown in the arm (to no avail against Browns

    determination), and then the chest (he at that point started to fall, but kept stumbling on with the

    possibility of pulling out a gun and shooting with his free hand before collapsing), and then the

    head. The irony of all of this is that if Wilsons side of the story is true, the current protests of

    Hands up, dont shoot are completely in vain because if Browns hands had been up, then Brown

    would most likely be alive and there would be no protesting. The other irony of this is the Black

    Lives Matter saying. Let me word this very specifically and carefully: The American system of

    justice centers around the individual rather than group harmony. This is not so in some communist

    states of the Orient. They will sacrifice the happiness or the life of one individual in order to make a

    good statement and keep group harmony. In America, and in this specific situation, justice does not

    come to all black people or all white people at once. Justice comes to Michael Brown and Darren

    Wilson, and those two people only. So yes, black lives certainly matter, but if Darren Wilson acted

    completely in his rights in this specific situation, then we cannot forget that his life matters too.

    Conclusion

    In conclusion, I am the first to admit that I do not know nearly enough about this case to

    decide which side of this essay I want to side with, and that is why I wrote it. In real terms, we may

    never know what happened. We will never get a criminal trial, and Darren Wilson will never be

    pressured to make a confession if has one. You can either look at that fact as a huge bummer and a

    fallacy in our judicial system or as the most painless way to let all of this unrest pass quickly. A trial

    might only serve as a prolongational tool for protesting and rioting around the country, especially if

    a not guilty verdict were to be returned after all of it. As far as I am concerned, no side of this

    mess is without fault. Brown shouldnt have robbed the store or picked a fight with a cop. Wilson

    shouldnt have excessively fired his gun or left Browns dead body on the street for four and a half

    hours. Eyewitnesses shouldnt have been so contradictory with their stories. McCulloch should

  • have stepped down and let a special prosecutor take his place. Protestors should have listened to the

    entirety of the indictment announcement instead of tuning out right after the decision was stated.

    Wilsons stepfather shouldnt have instigated riots. The national media shouldnt have figuratively

    poked Ferguson with a stick trying to get it to put on a display that could get ratings. Protestors

    should not be ruining local businesses for their cause, and the general public should not be claiming

    to know all that the twelve members of the grand jury know about this case. What is saddening

    about all of that is that there is no way for America to admit to itself that almost everyone is in the

    wrong and therefore the entire argument is all for naught. Instead, everyone wants everyone else to

    pay for what they did wrong. But oh the irony when we finally realize that everyone has paid but no

    one has gained or lost.