Upload
pianoman187
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
A sociological paper on the Happenings of the Michael Brown incident in Ferguson.
Citation preview
Sam Krausz
SOC-1002
December 1, 2014
Ferguson: Is Anyone Right?
#HandsUpDontShoot
#BlackLivesMatter
The two hashtags above represent the two largest points of controversy in the United
States right now. Not the fact that those are true statements that we should be working toward
that is true - but whether or not the context for the argument is appropriate. What we all know
about the Ferguson case of Michael Brown is that he robbed Ferguson Market and Liquor by
overpowering the store owner, was told directly afterward by a police officer named Darren
Wilson to step off of the street and get on the sidewalk, then a struggle of some sort went on
between Wilson and Brown wherein Brown was at some point in the front seat section of Wilsons
police vehicle and unarmed at all times, and then Browns body was found in the middle of the
street four and a half hours after being shot by Wilson six times in the arm, chest, and front of the
head. Besides that, what does anyone in the general public actually know? The amount of tangible
educated-opinion-forming fact readily available to the public is about enough to fill a tablespoon.
Because of the muddy nature of the Michael Brown incident in Ferguson, Missouri, the protests
taking place in St. Louis and across the country could either be every bit as meaningful as they are
aiming to be, or one of the largest ironies that the United States has seen in quite some time.
A Meaningful and Needed Protest
If some of the eyewitness accounts of the incident are found to be true and Michael Brown
was actually killed in an unjust way by Darren Wilson, then these protests are exactly what
America needs to listen to and take heed of. One of the facts that we know about this incident was
that Browns body lay on the ground in the glaring sun for four and a half hours. Of that, we all can
be assured that someone made a bad move somewhere. EMTs should have been on scene in less
than an hour, no excuses.
This has been a large part of the peaceful protests that have gone on throughout the city,
especially at the St. Louis Galleria, which lies five minutes away from my house, where Black
Friday was shut down at 2pm because of the protestors Die-ins, which means that large groups of
them would lay down all over the floor for four and a half minutes at a time to signify the four and a
half hours that Browns body lay dead on the street. Truthfully, no matter the situation, county
services should have at least acted like they cared about a black mans body lying in the street.
Browns life matters. Black lives matter. This sentiment can also be transferred to the incident
itself. Wilson should have at least acted like Browns life mattered by not shooting his unarmed
person six times, especially because according to some eyewitness accounts Brown had his
hands up in a gesture of surrender when Wilson shot him. That circulated story sparked the
hashtags that begin this essay. Those hashtags need to be heard. There is without a doubt a
concentration of people in the country who do not see the fallacies of our law enforcement system
and who see minorities as lesser to themselves, and those ignorant people must come to see the
logistical problems with their viewpoints and change their sentiments appropriately if this country
can ever hope to eradicate unjust social inequality.
A Dreadful Irony
If the evidence of the incident matches up with Darren Wilsons personal account of the
situation just as the jury has (arguably) already ruled it does, then the protests and riots trying to
avenge Michael Browns death are not just meaningless, but they radiate irony. One of the facts that
we know about this incident, and that we have photo evidence to prove, is that Michael Brown
robbed Ferguson Market and Liquor by overpowering the storeowner before coming into contact
with Darren Wilson. This sheds a negative light on this entire situation for the Brown side of the
argument in two ways: 1. If Brown was stupid enough to rob a convenience store for cigarillos and
use his truly imposing size to overpower the owner of that store without any attempt to hide his
identity to the video cameras, then talking back to and instigating a stupid fight with a scrawny cop
is not such a far-fetched possibility. 2. The rioters made complete idiots of themselves by looting
and trashing the very convenience store where the only proof of Michael Browns wrongdoing was
fully present. A powerful video of the storeowner standing in his wrecked lifes work after a night
of looting shows its audience the most cheated and defeated man in this whole mess. This man is
the perfect example of why violence and rioting is never the answer: because innocent fellow
citizens lives are ruined for the sake of ignorant rage. But I will turn my attention away from the
rioting, as that can be dismissed as a shameful act of instigation by Michael Browns stepfather when
he jumped on top of a car and shouted Lets burn this b**** to the ground! and by the multitude
of national media trucks that showed up to St. Louis with the expectation of a good show.
Now peaceful protests have taken over from the rioting, and with it, chants of the two
hashtags found at the beginning of this essay. These groups are denouncing police brutality by
saying Hands up, dont shoot! and denouncing institutionalized racism by saying Black Lives
Matter. Again, I would like to state that I agree with these statements to the fullest extent, but if
the case of Michael Brown actually transpired in the way that Darren Wilson described it, a way
that does not contradict any of the evidence currently available to the general public, then this is the
wrong case after which to be protesting for these ideals. According to Wilson, Brown initiated a
brawl with him, climbed into his car, tried to steal his weapon from him, insulted his masculinity
by betting Wilson that he would not shoot, then ran away from the car with Wilson following him
just as any cop is trained to do. Brown turned after Wilson yelled after him, put one of his hands
into his waistline as if possibly reaching for a concealed weapon, and started charging Wilson, who
then fired two warning shots before shooting Brown in the arm (to no avail against Browns
determination), and then the chest (he at that point started to fall, but kept stumbling on with the
possibility of pulling out a gun and shooting with his free hand before collapsing), and then the
head. The irony of all of this is that if Wilsons side of the story is true, the current protests of
Hands up, dont shoot are completely in vain because if Browns hands had been up, then Brown
would most likely be alive and there would be no protesting. The other irony of this is the Black
Lives Matter saying. Let me word this very specifically and carefully: The American system of
justice centers around the individual rather than group harmony. This is not so in some communist
states of the Orient. They will sacrifice the happiness or the life of one individual in order to make a
good statement and keep group harmony. In America, and in this specific situation, justice does not
come to all black people or all white people at once. Justice comes to Michael Brown and Darren
Wilson, and those two people only. So yes, black lives certainly matter, but if Darren Wilson acted
completely in his rights in this specific situation, then we cannot forget that his life matters too.
Conclusion
In conclusion, I am the first to admit that I do not know nearly enough about this case to
decide which side of this essay I want to side with, and that is why I wrote it. In real terms, we may
never know what happened. We will never get a criminal trial, and Darren Wilson will never be
pressured to make a confession if has one. You can either look at that fact as a huge bummer and a
fallacy in our judicial system or as the most painless way to let all of this unrest pass quickly. A trial
might only serve as a prolongational tool for protesting and rioting around the country, especially if
a not guilty verdict were to be returned after all of it. As far as I am concerned, no side of this
mess is without fault. Brown shouldnt have robbed the store or picked a fight with a cop. Wilson
shouldnt have excessively fired his gun or left Browns dead body on the street for four and a half
hours. Eyewitnesses shouldnt have been so contradictory with their stories. McCulloch should
have stepped down and let a special prosecutor take his place. Protestors should have listened to the
entirety of the indictment announcement instead of tuning out right after the decision was stated.
Wilsons stepfather shouldnt have instigated riots. The national media shouldnt have figuratively
poked Ferguson with a stick trying to get it to put on a display that could get ratings. Protestors
should not be ruining local businesses for their cause, and the general public should not be claiming
to know all that the twelve members of the grand jury know about this case. What is saddening
about all of that is that there is no way for America to admit to itself that almost everyone is in the
wrong and therefore the entire argument is all for naught. Instead, everyone wants everyone else to
pay for what they did wrong. But oh the irony when we finally realize that everyone has paid but no
one has gained or lost.