20
Federalism & the Separation of Powers

Federalism & the Separation of Powers. 2003 Copyright © by W.W. Norton and Company 2003

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Federalism & the Separation of Powers. 2003 Copyright © by W.W. Norton and Company 2003

Federalism & the Separation of Powers

Page 2: Federalism & the Separation of Powers. 2003 Copyright © by W.W. Norton and Company 2003

2003Copyright © by W.W. Norton and Company 2003

Page 3: Federalism & the Separation of Powers. 2003 Copyright © by W.W. Norton and Company 2003
Page 4: Federalism & the Separation of Powers. 2003 Copyright © by W.W. Norton and Company 2003

Ambition must be made to counteract ambition…

Federalist, No. 51

Page 5: Federalism & the Separation of Powers. 2003 Copyright © by W.W. Norton and Company 2003

Anti-Federalists and the Vice Presidency

18th CENTURY PRINCIPLE: On questions of separation of powers the Framers of the Constitution looked primarily to Montesquieu who argued, among other things, for a strict separation of the functions of the legislative, executive and judicial branches.

ANTI-FEDERALIST OBJECTION: The Constitution, by making the AMERICAN VICE PRESIDENT both a member of the executive branch and President of the Senate, violated this central principle of separation of powers.

Page 6: Federalism & the Separation of Powers. 2003 Copyright © by W.W. Norton and Company 2003

Anti-Federalists and the Vice Presidency

“The Vice-President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided.”

--Article I, Section 3 of the United States Constitution

Page 7: Federalism & the Separation of Powers. 2003 Copyright © by W.W. Norton and Company 2003

Anti-Federalists and the Vice Presidency

18th CENTURY PRINCIPLE: The states (former colonies) were, to a degree, independent entities that deserved equal representation as states. This was achieved in the Senate.

ANTI-FEDERALIST OBJECTION: In cases of tie votes, the Vice President’s state would have an additional vote and thus an unequal advantage in the Senate.

Page 8: Federalism & the Separation of Powers. 2003 Copyright © by W.W. Norton and Company 2003

Anti-Federalists and the Vice Presidency

Intense squabble that exemplifies two salient issues that help us to understand late 18th century politics:

1. The concept of separation of powers was understood to demand a strict separation in the functions of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government.

2. The relative strength of the states was at the heart of many of the political battles of the time

—the balance of power between national and state governments was central.

Page 9: Federalism & the Separation of Powers. 2003 Copyright © by W.W. Norton and Company 2003

Federalism and the American Founding

What the Federalists Were For

1. A powerful central government.

2. Government “filtered” from popular control.

3. A potentially expansive central government that could govern a large country.

What the Anti-Federalists Were For

1. The retention of state sovereignty and strength.

2. More popular control of state-run governments.

3. Fidelity to traditional notions of republicanism.

Page 10: Federalism & the Separation of Powers. 2003 Copyright © by W.W. Norton and Company 2003

Federalism and the American Founding

Although the Federalists won the struggle over ratification, the federal balance of power remained contested and paradoxical throughout American history:

1. the ability of states to “nullify” federal laws;

2. the Civil War;

3. the power of the central government in the New Deal;

4. the “rights” of states vs. the rights of citizens in the Civil Rights Movement.

5. Contemporary controversies involving education, abortion, criminal justice, gay marriage, individual liberties, etc.

Page 11: Federalism & the Separation of Powers. 2003 Copyright © by W.W. Norton and Company 2003

Federalism and the American Founding

PARADOX OF POLITICS:

Generally, there exists a trade-off between freedom and order.

FEDERALISM PARADOX:

Were the states to be free to pursue their own courses or would the central government coordinate and coerce them to uniformity?

Page 12: Federalism & the Separation of Powers. 2003 Copyright © by W.W. Norton and Company 2003

Does federalism enhance better citizenship?

Trade-off between political participation and levels & size of government unit.

Page 13: Federalism & the Separation of Powers. 2003 Copyright © by W.W. Norton and Company 2003

Federalism defined…

System of government in which power is divided, by a constitution, between a central government & regional governments

The horizontal division of power. See Madison’s Federalist, No. 39 & 46

Page 14: Federalism & the Separation of Powers. 2003 Copyright © by W.W. Norton and Company 2003

Constitutional Design of Federalism:

Article I, Sec. 8– Enumerated (Expressed) Powers– Necessary and Proper (or Elastic) Clause

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

– Article VI: Supremacy Clause

Tenth Amendment: Reserved Powers Article IV

– Sec. 1: Full Faith and Credit– Sec. 2: Privileges & Immunities

Page 15: Federalism & the Separation of Powers. 2003 Copyright © by W.W. Norton and Company 2003

So which is supreme, the national government or state governments?

Page 16: Federalism & the Separation of Powers. 2003 Copyright © by W.W. Norton and Company 2003

Stages of Federalism

STAGE 1: “Dual Federalism” (1789-1937)

1. Central government focused on promotion of commerce and distribution of resources.

2. States retain most remaining powers.

Page 17: Federalism & the Separation of Powers. 2003 Copyright © by W.W. Norton and Company 2003

Stages of Federalism

There have been FOUR STAGES OF FEDERALISM throughout American history.

I. “DUAL II. “COOPERATIVE III. “REGULATED IV. “NEW

FEDERALISM” FEDERALISM” FEDERALISM FEDERALISM”

1789 1937 1960 1970 1990

Page 18: Federalism & the Separation of Powers. 2003 Copyright © by W.W. Norton and Company 2003
Page 19: Federalism & the Separation of Powers. 2003 Copyright © by W.W. Norton and Company 2003

Stages of Federalism

There have been FOUR STAGES OF FEDERALISM throughout American history.

I. “DUAL II. “COOPERATIVE III. “REGULATED IV. “NEW

FEDERALISM” FEDERALISM” FEDERALISM FEDERALISM”

1789 1937 1960 1970 1990

Page 20: Federalism & the Separation of Powers. 2003 Copyright © by W.W. Norton and Company 2003