Upload
adroit-anonymity
View
13
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Lawsuit filed in Texas federal court for failure to pay for acquisition of software startup company.
Citation preview
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
Eli Rubel, Plaintiff, v. Acclaim Financial Group, LLC, and FPX, LLC. Defendants.
)))))))))))
Case No. _______________
PLAINTIFF ELI RUBEL’S COMPLAINT
Plaintiff Eli Rubel, as and for his Complaint, states and alleges the following:
THE PARTIES
1. Eli Rubel (“Rubel”), Plaintiff herein, is an individual residing in San Francisco,
California.
2. Acclaim Financial Group, LLC (“Acclaim”) is a Texas limited liability company with
its principal place of business in Tyler, Texas.
3. FPX, LLC (“FPX”) is a Delaware limited liability company with its headquarters in
Dallas, Texas.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
4. Original jurisdiction of this matter is founded on 28 U.S.C. § 1332, as there is complete
diversity and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.
5. Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391, as a substantial part of the events giving
rise to the claim occurred within this judicial district, and Acclaim is located within this judicial
district.
6. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Acclaim and FPX by virtue of their
Case 6:15-cv-00859 Document 1 Filed 09/17/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1
2
continuous and systematic contacts with Texas as both companies are headquartered in Texas.
7. This Court further has personal jurisdiction over Acclaim due to the express contractual
agreement of the parties.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
8. Rubel is the co-founder, inventor, and CEO of a start-up software company named
Secure Document Technology Company d/b/a Glider (“Glider”).
9. Glider created and wholly-owned a unique software system that automated the closing
of contracts for companies of all sizes using sophisticated CRM solutions such as Salesforce (the
“Glider Software”).
10. On February 10, 2014, Acclaim, a private equity firm, entered into a Stock Sale
Agreement with Glider and Rubel, by which Acclaim wholly acquired the software company. Said
Stock Sale Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit 1 and incorporated herein by reference.
11. Acclaim states on public social media that its business is “Venture Capital & Private
Equity.”
12. Ms. Audrey Spangenberg states on public social media that she is the “Managing
Member” of Acclaim, and has been from 1994 to date.
13. On information and belief, Acclaim entered into said Stock Sale Agreement specifically
to convey Glider’s software and other intellectual property to FPX, its wholly-owned subsidiary.
14. The headline of a press release on FPX’s website states: “FPX Acquires Glider,
Redefines the Sales Contracting Process.” See http://fpx.com/press-releases/fpx-acquires-glider-
redfines-the-sales-contracting-process (Apr. 22, 2014).
15. In its authored press release, FPX publicly stated that Glider was acquired by FPX as
follows:
Case 6:15-cv-00859 Document 1 Filed 09/17/15 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 2
3
a. “DALLAS, April 22nd, 2014 – FPX . . . announced today its acquisition of
Portland-based Glider to extend its offerings to include best-in-class contract lifecycle management
(CLM) automation. . . . Extending beyond typical CPQ solutions, the acquisition now enables FPX to
facilitate the entire end-to-end sales closing process through workflow automation and predictive
analytics.”
b. “[S]aid Dave Batt, chief executive officer of FPX[,] ‘[T]he acquisition of Glider
illustrates our commitment to provide companies the broad spectrum of applications to transform their
operations . . . .”
c. “[S]aid Dave Hawkins, vice president of sales operations at Fujitsu Network
Communications[,] ‘FPX has a solid track record as our vendor partner and its acquisition of Glider
will enable FPX customers to run more end-to-end business processes in the cloud.” See
http://fpx.com/press-releases/fpx-acquires-glider-redefines-the-sales-contracting-process (emphasis
added).
16. Ms. Audrey Spangenberg lists herself as the Chairman and CEO of FPX from February
of 2009 through April of 2013, and thereafter served as the Chairman of FPX from April of 2013
through the present.
17. On information and belief, Acclaim then entered into a licensing agreement with FPX,
a software company, pursuant to which FPX has integrated and now uses Glider’s software, and in
doing so uses the trade secrets and intellectual property of Glider.
18. Specifically, FPX has renamed the Glider software and function thusly: “The Smart
Contract Management application – the one powered by the FPX Predictive Analytics engine.” See
http://fpx.com/applications/smart-contract-management.
19. At all times prior to the Stock Sale Agreement, Glider held full and complete rights,
Case 6:15-cv-00859 Document 1 Filed 09/17/15 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 3
4
title, and interest in the Glider Software and all aspects thereof, and thereby held full and complete
rights, title, and interest in all copyrights and attendant intellectual property rights in the Glider
Software.
20. Pursuant to the Stock Sale Agreement, Acclaim agreed to pay $3,000,000, the payment
of which was divided between a first cash payment of $1,000,000 and a Promissory Note Payment
securing the remaining $2,000,000 owed.
21. Of the $2,000,000 originally secured by Promissory Note, $1,143,303.09 in principal,
plus interest, was payable to Rubel. The Rubel Promissory Note (“Rubel Note”) is attached hereto as
Exhibit 2 and incorporated herein by reference.
22. On information and belief, as part of the license agreement entered into between FPX
and Acclaim, FPX agreed to pay the amounts due under the Promissory Note Payment, including the
amounts owed under the Rubel Note.
23. The Rubel Note provides that the outstanding amount due was payable on or before
February 10, 2015. See Ex. 2.
24. On February 7, 2015, at the request of Dave Batt and Audrey Spangenberg, Acclaim
and Rubel entered into a letter agreement by which they agreed to extend the February 10, 2015 payoff
date to August 10, 2015. Said Letter Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit 3 and incorporated
herein by reference.
25. To date, Acclaim and FPX have failed to pay the monies owed to Rubel under the
Rubel Note, which represents over 35% of the total consideration that Acclaim is contractually
obligated to pay for Glider.
26. As a result of the event of default, Rubel requested by letter dated September 11th 2015,
pursuant to paragraph 8.2 of the Stock Sale Agreement, further assurances from Acclaim and even
Case 6:15-cv-00859 Document 1 Filed 09/17/15 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 4
5
proposed several options for Acclaim’s compliance with this obligation.
27. Paragraph 8.2 of the Stock Sale Agreement provides that “[i]f at any time after the
Closing any further action is necessary or desirable to carry out the purposes of this [Stock Sale]
Agreement and its contemplated transactions, each of the Parties will take further actions, including
the signing and delivery of further instruments and documents, as the requesting Party reasonably may
request, all at the sole cost and expense of the requesting Party.” See Ex. 1 ¶ 8.2.
28. Despite this contractual agreement, Acclaim has refused to comply with this Post-
Closing Covenant.
29. Acclaim and FPX continue their possession, use and marketing of the Glider software
and intellectual property
30. Based on their continued breach under the note, Rubel hereby brings its claim in a court
within the state of Texas, as required by the Rubel Note and agreed to by the Parties.
COUNT I
DEFAULT ON PROMISSORY NOTE
31. Rubel repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 30 above as if fully set forth herein.
32. Defendants have failed to pay the sums due and owing under the Rubel Note on or
before the agreed upon deadlines of August 10, 2015.
33. By virtue of Defendants’ failure to pay, they have committed an act of default under the
Rubel Note.
34. Defendants are required, by the terms and conditions of the Rubel Note, to immediately
pay the full amount due and owing plus interest.
Case 6:15-cv-00859 Document 1 Filed 09/17/15 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 5
6
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Eli Rubel is entitled to judgment as follows:
i. That Defendants have defaulted on the Rubel Note, and that all principal sums
and interest are now due and owing;
ii. To the costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney’s fees, incurred by
Rubel in connection with this action as Rubel is entitled under the Rubel Note
and as a result of Defendants wrongful conduct;
iii. To such other additional relief that this Court determines is just, proper, and
equitable.
Dated: September 17, 2015
FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP /s/ Jesse Linebaugh Jesse Linebaugh TXAT24036970 [email protected] 801 Grand Avenue, 33rd Floor Des Moines, Iowa 50309-8011 Telephone: (515) 248-9000 Facsimile: (515) 248-9010 Attorney for Plaintiff
US.99565945.01
Case 6:15-cv-00859 Document 1 Filed 09/17/15 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 6
CIVIL COVER SHEET
(SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.)
I. (a) PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS
(b)(EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)
(c) (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number) (If Known)
II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an “X” in One Box Only) III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an “X” in One Box for Plaintiff(For Diversity Cases Only) and One Box for Defendant)
PTF DEF PTF DEF(U.S. Government Not a Party) or
and(Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III)
IV. NATURE OF SUIT (Place an “X” in One Box Only)CONTRACT TORTS FORFEITURE/PENALTY BANKRUPTCY OTHER STATUTES
PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY
PROPERTY RIGHTS
LABOR SOCIAL SECURITY PERSONAL PROPERTY
REAL PROPERTY CIVIL RIGHTS PRISONER PETITIONS FEDERAL TAX SUITSHabeas Corpus:
IMMIGRATIONOther:
V. ORIGIN (Place an “X” in One Box Only)
(specify)
VI. CAUSE OF ACTION(Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity)
VII. REQUESTED IN COMPLAINT:
CLASS ACTION DEMAND $JURY DEMAND:
VIII. RELATED CASE(S) IF ANY (See instructions):
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
ELI GABRIEL RUBEL
SAN FRANCISCO CNTY.
JESSE LINEBAUGH FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS(515) 248-9000 801 GRAND AVENUE, 33rd FLOOR
DES MOINES, IOWA 50309
ACCLAIM FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC, and FPX, LLC
28 U.S.C. § 1332; 28 U.S.C. § 1391
DEFAULT ON PROMISSORY NOTE
1,143,303.19
09/17/2015
plus interest, cost, expenses, and attorney fees
/s/ Jesse Linebaugh
Case 6:15-cv-00859 Document 1-4 Filed 09/17/15 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 27
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTfor the
__________ District of __________
))))))))))))
Plaintiff(s)
v. Civil Action No.
Defendant(s)
SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION
To: (Defendant’s name and address)
A lawsuit has been filed against you.
Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if youare the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 ofthe Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,whose name and address are:
If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You also must file your answer or motion with the court.
CLERK OF COURT
Date:Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Eastern District of Texas
ELI GABRIEL RUBEL
ACCLAIM FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC and FPX, LLC
Jesse LinebaughFaegre Baker Daniels801 Grand Avenue, 33rd FloorDes Moines, Iowa 50309-8003
15-859
Case 6:15-cv-00859 Document 1-5 Filed 09/17/15 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 28
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)
Civil Action No.
PROOF OF SERVICE(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))
This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)
was received by me on (date) .
I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)
on (date) ; or
I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)
, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,
on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or
I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is
designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)
on (date) ; or
I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or
Other (specify):
.
My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .
I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.
Date:Server’s signature
Printed name and title
Server’s address
Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:
0.00
Case 6:15-cv-00859 Document 1-5 Filed 09/17/15 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 29