100
February 19, 2015 IEEE EDS MQ, WIMNACT 45, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan Hiroshi Iwai Frontier Research Center, Tokyo Institute of Technology Future of Electron Devices Technologies 1

February 19, 2015 IEEE EDS MQ, WIMNACT 45, Tokyo ...February 19, 2015 IEEE EDS MQ, WIMNACT 45, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan Hiroshi Iwai Frontier Research Center,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • February 19, 2015IEEE EDS MQ, WIMNACT 45,Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan

    Hiroshi Iwai

    Frontier Research Center, Tokyo Institute of Technology

    Future of Electron Devices Technologies

    1

  • 1. Brief introduction of our research group in Tokyo Institute of Technology

    Outline of my talk:

    2. Innovations of logic device technology for past 60 years

    3. Innovations of logic device technology for next 60 years

    2 & 3 based on ESSDERC Tutorial & IEDM Panel, both in2014

  • ESSDERC Tutorial, September 22, 2014, Venice, Italy

  • 60 Years of IEDM and Counting: Did we push silicon based devices for integrated electronics to the ultimate and what does the future hold?

    IEDM Panel, December 18, 2014, San Francisco, USA

    Moderator: Krishna Saraswat (Stanford University)

    Panelist:Jesus del Alamo (MIT), Compound/PowerChenming Hu (University of California, Berkeley): Si DeviceHiroshi Iwai (Tokyo Institute of Technology):Process/DeviceYoshi Nishi (Stanford University):MemoryKurt Petersen (Co-founder of MEMS companies):MEMS/sensorPhilip Wong (Stanford University):Nano technology

  • 1. Brief introduction of my research group in Tokyo Institute of Technology

    Outline of my talk:

    2. Innovations of logic device technology for past 60 years

    3. Innovations of logic device technology for next 60 years

    2 & 3 based on ESSDERC Tutorial & IEDM Panel, both in2014

  • Tokyo Institute of Technology (東京工業大学)

    Suzukakedai Campus (鈴懸台校庭)

    Interdisciplinary Gradate School of Science and Engineering(大学院総合理工学研究科)

    Department of Electronics and Applied Physics(物理電子系統創造専攻)

    Frontier Research Center (先端研究機構)

    Department of Electronics and Applied Physics(集積機能素子分野)

    Research Project: Creation of Green Nanoelectronic Devices(環境保全極微電子素子創生事業)

  • Suzukakedai Campus

    Interdisciplinary Gradate School of Science and Engineering

    Frontier Research Center

  • Members of Iwai & Kakushima Laboratory November, 2014

    SecretaryBachelorStudents

    M. NishizawaA. Matsumoto

    L. PuchengM. Okamoto X. H. Tan Y. Nakamura H. Hasegawa S. Munekiyo M. MotokiH. Imamura

    Y. Lei J. Jin

    T. Shoji

    M. Yoon T. Ohashi T. Katou M. Sugiura H. Hori A. Miyawaki

    K. Ohga K. MatsuuraT. Suzuki

    T. Baba R. Fukui R. Miyazawa

    Prof.K. Natori

    Prof.H. Iwai

    A. Prof.K. Kakushima

    Prof.N. Sugii

    Prof.K. Tsutsui

    Prof.S. M. Sze

    Prof.A. Nishiyama

    Prof.Y. Kataoka

    Prof.H. Wakabayashi

    Prof.H. Ohashi

    MasterStudents

    Researcher

    T. Kawanago

    DoctorStudents

    M. Koyama S. YamaguchiW. Li C. J. Ning A. SasakiH. Yabuhara

  • 研究風景

    9

  • Research Project: Creation of Green Nanoelectronic Devices(環境保全極微電子素子創生事業)

    Information Technology

    Renewable Energy

    Power Saving Technology

    Integrated Circuit Technology

    Si nanowire-FET, High-k gate stack, silicide S/D

    InGaAs/Ge-FET, T-FET, RRAM

    CMOS Image sensor, Other sensor

    Photovoltaic devices: Si-nanowire, BaSi/FeSi

    Si-IGBT, GaN, SiC Power devices

  • Brain: Integrated Circuits

    Hands, Legs:Power device

    Stomach:PV device

    Ear, Eye:Sensor

    Mouth:RF/Opto device

    Various semiconductor devicesBrain is very important

    11

  • 1. Brief introduction of my research group in Tokyo Institute of Technology

    Outline of my talk:

    2. Innovations of logic device technology for past 60 years

    3. Innovations of logic device technology for next 60 years

    2 & 3 based on ESSDERC Tutorial & IEDM Panel, both in2014

  • Lee De Forest

    Electronics started by the invention of vacuum tube (Triode) in 1906

    Cathode(heated) Grid

    Anode(Positive bias)

    Thermal electrons from cathodecontrolled by grid bias

    Same mechanism as that of transistor

  • 1947: 1st transistor W. Bratten,

    W. ShockleyBipolar using Ge

    However, they found amplification phenomenon when investigatingGe surface when putting needles.This is the 1st Transistor: Not Field Effect Transistor, But Bipolar Transistor (another mechanism)

    J. Bardeen

    14

  • 1960: First MOSFET by D. Kahng and M. Atalla

    Al

    SiO2Si

    Si/SiO2 Interface is extraordinarily good

    Top View

    Gate Oxd

    ChannelSource Drain

    Gate electrodeSurface

    S D

    G

    Electron flow

    15

  • 1970,71: 1st generation of LSIs (Si-MOSFETs)1k bit DRAM Intel 1103 MPU Intel 4004

    (Clock 750 KHz)

    1970 Microelecrtonics started

    16

  • 2000 “Nano-Electronics” started.

    Intel Pentium 4 : Clock 1 ~ 2 GHz

    180 nm

    17

  • Now, 2015 “Nano-Electronics” continued.

    Device: Still, Si CMOS integrated circuitsDevice feature size: a few 10 nmMajor Appl.: Still Digital (µ-processor, cell phone, etc.)

    Still evolution and innovation are going on.

    Broadwell SoC (Intel)

    http://download.intel.com/newsroom/kits/14nm/pdfs/Intel_14nm_New_uArch.pdf18

  • 1900 1950 1960 1970 2000

    VacuumTube

    Transistor IC LSI VLSI

    10 cm cm mm 10 µm 100 nm

    In 100 years, the size reduced by ten million times.There have been many devices from stone age.We have never experienced such a tremendous reduction of devices in human history.

    10-1m 10-2m 10-3m 10-5m 10-7m

    Downsizing of the components has been the driving force for circuit evolution

    2014

    VLSI

    14 nm

    10-8m

    19

  • What is the innovations in the past 60 years.

    That is from the beginning of IEDM

    IEDM:International Electron Devices Meeting60 year history

  • 1st IEDM, October 24-25, 1955 in Washington DC

    10 sessions in total

    1 general session

    6 Vacuum tube sessions

    3 Semiconductor sessions

    “Semiconductor Devices” by J. A. Morton, Bell Labs.

    “Thermionic Cathodes” by L. S. Nergaad, RCA Labs.

    “Microwave Tubes” by L. M. Field, Huges Aircraft Co.

  • 1954: 1st Si Bipolar Transistor by Bell Labs• 1st Commercial Si Bipolar Transistor by TI

    1947: 1st Bipolar Transistor (Ge) by Bell Labs.

    1952: Diffusion Process by Bell Labs1954: Photo lithography by Bell Labs

    http://www.computerhistory.org/semiconductor/welcome.html

    1955: Thermally grown SiO2 film by Bell Labs1950’s: Pure Si substrate by Czochralski method by TI 1950’s: Thin film deposition evaporation/sputtering/CVD

    Innovations for semiconductor devices before the 1st IEDM (1955)

    • But no MOSFETs nor IC.

    • Most of Process techniques existed before the 1st IEDM

  • http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/2014/

    The Nobel Prize in Physics in 2014

    The Nobel Prize in Physics 2014 was awarded jointly to Isamu Akasaki, Hiroshi Amano and Shuji Nakamura "for the invention of efficient blue light-emitting diodes which has enabled bright and energy-saving white light sources".

    Isamu Akasaki Hiroshi Amano Shuji Nakamura

  • So, what semiconductor materials are related to Nobel Prize?

  • Innovations recognized as Nobel Prize

    What semiconductor materials are related to Nobel Prize?

  • Innovations recognized as Nobel Prize

    1956 W. B. Shockley, J. Bardeen, W. S. Brattin, Ge bipolar transistor (Germanium)

    What semiconductor materials are related to Nobel Prize?

  • Innovations recognized as Nobel Prize

    1973 L. Esaki, I. GIaever, for tunneling effect, Ge-diode (Germanium)

    1956 W. B. Shockley, J. Bardeen, W. S. Brattin, Ge bipolar transistor (Germanium)

    What semiconductor materials are related to Nobel Prize?

  • Innovations recognized as Nobel Prize

    2000 J. S. Kilby, for Integrated Circuits, Ge bipolar transistor (Germanium)

    1973 L. Esaki, I. GIaever, for tunneling effect, Ge-diode (Germanium)

    1956 W. B. Shockley, J. Bardeen, W. S. Brattin, Ge bipolar transistor (Germanium)

    What semiconductor materials are related to Nobel Prize?

  • Innovations recognized as Nobel Prize

    2000 Z. I. Alferov, H. Cromer, for Semiconductor Hetero-junction: (Compound)

    2000 J. S. Kilby, for Integrated Circuits, Ge bipolar transistor (Germanium)

    1973 L. Esaki, I. GIaever, for tunneling effect, Ge-diode (Germanium)

    1956 W. B. Shockley, J. Bardeen, W. S. Brattin, Ge bipolar transistor (Germanium)

    What semiconductor materials are related to Nobel Prize?

  • Innovations recognized as Nobel Prize

    2009 W. S. Boyle, G. Smith, for CCD device (Silicon)

    2000 Z. I. Alferov, H. Cromer, for Semiconductor Hetero-junction: (Compound)

    2000 J. S. Kilby, for Integrated Circuits, Ge bipolar transistor (Germanium)

    1973 L. Esaki, I. GIaever, for tunneling effect, Ge-diode (Germanium)

    1956 W. B. Shockley, J. Bardeen, W. S. Brattin, Ge bipolar transistor (Germanium)

    What semiconductor materials are related to Nobel Prize?

  • Innovations recognized as Nobel Prize

    2010 A. Geim, K. Novoselov, for 2D Graphene device (Carbon)

    2009 W. S. Boyle, G. Smith, for CCD device (Silicon)

    2000 Z. I. Alferov, H. Cromer, for Semiconductor Hetero-junction: (Compound)

    2000 J. S. Kilby, for Integrated Circuits, Ge bipolar transistor (Germanium)

    1973 L. Esaki, I. GIaever, for tunneling effect, Ge-diode (Germanium)

    1956 W. B. Shockley, J. Bardeen, W. S. Brattin, Ge bipolar transistor (Germanium)

    What semiconductor materials are related to Nobel Prize?

  • Innovations recognized as Nobel Prize

    2010 A. Geim, K. Novoselov, for 2D Graphene device (Carbon)

    2009 W. S. Boyle, G. Smith, for CCD device (Silicon)

    2000 Z. I. Alferov, H. Cromer, for Semiconductor Hetero-junction: (Compound)

    2000 J. S. Kilby, for Integrated Circuits, Ge bipolar transistor (Germanium)

    1973 L. Esaki, I. GIaever, for tunneling effect, Ge-diode (Germanium)

    1956 W. B. Shockley, J. Bardeen, W. S. Brattin, Ge bipolar transistor (Germanium)

    2014 I. Akasaki, H. Amano, S. Nakamura, for GaN Blue (Compound: GaN)

    What semiconductor materials are related to Nobel Prize?

  • Innovations recognized as Nobel Prize

    2010 A. Geim, K. Novoselov, for 2D Graphene device (Carbon)

    2009 W. S. Boyle, G. Smith, for CCD device (Silicon)

    2000 Z. I. Alferov, H. Cromer, for Semiconductor Hetero-junction: (Compound)

    2000 J. S. Kilby, for Integrated Circuits, Ge bipolar transistor (Germanium)

    1973 L. Esaki, I. GIaever, for tunneling effect, Ge-diode (Germanium)

    1956 W. B. Shockley, J. Bardeen, W. S. Brattin, Ge bipolar transistor (Germanium)

    7 items

    2014 I. Akasaki, H. Amano, S. Nakamura, for GaN Blue (Compound: GaN)

    What semiconductor materials are related to Nobel Prize?

    Germanium:3, Compound:2, Silicon:1, Carbon:1

  • Innovations for Process/Device Technologies for MOS LSIs

  • Innovations for Process/Device Technologies for MOS LSIs So many

  • Innovations for Process/Device Technologies for MOS LSIs

    1955 – 1960 BJT Bipolar IC, Ge Si1957: Selective diffusion into Si using SiO2 as a mask by Bell Labs.

    1958: Integrated circuit for Ge bipolar transistors by TI.

    1959: Planar technology for Si bipolar by Fairchild.

    1960: Planar Integrated Circuit by Fairchild.

    So many

  • Innovations for Process/Device Technologies for MOS LSIs

    1955 – 1960 BJT Bipolar IC, Ge Si1957: Selective diffusion into Si using SiO2 as a mask by Bell Labs.

    1958: Integrated circuit for Ge bipolar transistors by TI.

    1959: Planar technology for Si bipolar by Fairchild.

    1st MOSFET by Bell Labs. (1960)1960 – 1970 MOSFET MOS IC

    PMOS Technology with Al gate

    Prevention of MOS instability by HCl cleaning and Phosphorus gettering by Fairchild & IBM(1964 -69)

    Poly Si gate and self-align between gate and source/drain by Bell Labs and Fairchild (1967-68)

    Idea of CMOS by Fairchild (1963)

    1960: Planar Integrated Circuit by Fairchild.

    MOS IC by RCA (1964)

    CVD oxide film depositionLOCOS isolation by Philips

    So many

  • 1970 – 1980 LSI, PMOS NMOS, 10 um 3 um

    Scaling scheme by IBM and Caltech prevention of SCE (1972)

    Ik DRAM, 1k SRAM, microprocessor (Intel, etc.) in early 1970’

    CAD Layout tool (Calma, Applicon) late 1970’s

    E-gun Al evaporation film deposition

    LPCVD for Poly-Si, SiO2, SiN

    Ion Implantation for channel doping, isolation

    Reflow (planarization) by PSG and BPSG: BPSG by Toshiba 1975

    Proximity lithography and projection lithography; Projection by Perkin Elmer

    Al-Si and Al-Si-Cu interconnects for prevention of Al-spike and electron migration

    Plasma etching (Isotropic) for Poly Si and SiN; CED by Toshiba

    LDD and gate sidewall formation for suppressing hot-carrier degradation by Bell Labs.

  • 1980 – 1990 VLSI, NMOS CMOS, 3 um 0.5 umDry process;

    Planarization by etch-back

    TCAD SEDAN, Suprem, Pisces by Stanford

    Circuit simulator, SPICE by UC Berkeley

    RIE for anisotropic etching poly Si and contact hole

    Ion implantation for S/D for shallow junction by Linttot

    Stepper lithography by GCA-Mann

    Plasma CVD for SiO2 and SiN

    Arsenic Source/Drain for shallow junction

    Polyside (WSi2/Poly Si) for gate electrode

    Metal sputter

    IG (Intrinsic gettering) wafer

    Planarization by CMP

    200 mm wader and related process equipment

  • 1990 – 2000 0.25 0.1 umOxynitride gate insulator

    Tunneling gate oxide by Toshiba Dual gate process n+-poly Si for NMOS, p+-poly Si for PMOS

    Salicide with TiSi2 and CoSi2NiSi silicide by Toshiba (1991)

    Ultra-shallow implantation for S/D

    Channel engineering for Halo and pocket

    SOI technologySOI wafer technology for smart-cutOPC for lithography resolution

    Phase shift mask for lithography resolutionKrF excimer stepper, Victor Pol/Bell Lab. (1986)

    Rapid Thermal Process by lamp heating

    Trench IsolationCu interconnectsLow-k interlayer300 mm wafer

  • 2000 – 2014 0.1um 30 ~ 20nm

    High-k/matal gate stack by Intel

    FinFET by Intel (idea, research AIST, Hitachi, UC Berkeley … 1980s, 1990s)

    ArF Eximer scanner (1997)

    Double/multiple patterning lithography for high resolution

    Fully-depleted SOI by STmicroelectronics and IBM (idea, research NTT & others before)

    Immersion lithography (2002, 2005)

    Air-gap insulation for interconnectDouble/multiple patterning lithography for high resolution

    Multi-core microprocessors

  • Then, what are 5 most important innovations in past 60 years?

    Too many important innovations which are 1 ~ 2 for every year!

    Conclusions!

  • 5 most important innovations in past 60 years

    1960 1st MOSFET operation; Si/SiO2 structure

    1971 1st Microprosessor; >1k MOSFETs; 10 um PMOS Tech.

    1955 1st IEDM; Already Si BJT, Already most of Process Technologies

    2014 Multi-core processor; >1G Fin-FET; 30 ~ 20 nm CMOS Tech.

  • 5 most important innovations in past 60 years

    1960 1st MOSFET operation; Si/SiO2 structure

    1971 1st Microprosessor; >1k MOSFETs; 10 um PMOS Tech.

    1955 1st IEDM; Already Si BJT, Already most of Process Technologies

    2014 Multi-core processor; >1G Fin-FET; 30 ~ 20 nm CMOS Tech.

    1. Planar BJT (or printing) technology IC technology

  • 5 most important innovations in past 60 years

    1960 1st MOSFET operation; Si/SiO2 structure

    1971 1st Microprosessor; >1k MOSFETs; 10 um PMOS Tech.

    1955 1st IEDM; Already Si BJT, Already most of Process Technologies

    2014 Multi-core processor; >1G Fin-FET; 30 ~ 20 nm CMOS Tech.

    1. Planar BJT (or printing) technology IC technology2. Si MOSFET (Lateral Device) Suitable: planar (IC) process

  • 5 most important innovations in past 60 years

    1960 1st MOSFET operation; Si/SiO2 structure

    1971 1st Microprosessor; >1k MOSFETs; 10 um PMOS Tech.

    1955 1st IEDM; Already Si BJT, Already most of Process Technologies

    2014 Multi-core processor; >1G Fin-FET; 30 ~ 20 nm CMOS Tech.

    1. Planar BJT (or printing) technology IC technology

    3. Clean & passivation processes Electrical Stability of MOS

    2. Si MOSFET (Lateral Device) Suitable: planar (IC) process

  • 5 most important innovations in past 60 years

    1960 1st MOSFET operation; Si/SiO2 structure

    1971 1st Microprosessor; >1k MOSFETs; 10 um PMOS Tech.

    1955 1st IEDM; Already Si BJT, Already most of Process Technologies

    2014 Multi-core processor; >1G Fin-FET; 30 ~ 20 nm CMOS Tech.

    1. Planar BJT (or printing) technology IC technology

    3. Clean & passivation processes Electrical Stability of MOS

    4. Miniaturization (Scaling) Moore’s law

    2. Si MOSFET (Lateral Device) Suitable: planar (IC) process

    Not only one, in fact, so many innovations for enabling miniaturization

  • 5 most important innovations in past 60 years

    1960 1st MOSFET operation; Si/SiO2 structure

    1971 1st Microprosessor; >1k MOSFETs; 10 um PMOS Tech.

    1955 1st IEDM; Already Si BJT, Already most of Process Technologies

    2014 Multi-core processor; >1G Fin-FET; 30 ~ 20 nm CMOS Tech.

    1. Planar BJT (or printing) technology IC technology

    3. Clean & passivation processes Electrical Stability of MOS

    4. Miniaturization (Scaling) Moore’s law

    2. Si MOSFET (Lateral Device) Suitable: planar (IC) process

    Not only one, in fact, so many innovations for enabling miniaturization

    5. CMOS LSI Power saving

  • 1. Brief introduction of my research group in Tokyo Institute of Technology

    Outline of my talk:

    2. Innovations of logic device technology for past 60 years

    3. Innovations of logic device technology for next 60 years

    2 & 3 based on ESSDERC Tutorial & IEDM Panel, both in2014

  • • What would be a future innovations for next 60 years?

  • • I will present the most probable scenario by my own view.

    • What would be a future innovations for next 60 years?

  • • I will present the most probable scenario by my own view.

    • What would be a future innovations for next 60 years?

    • I am very sorry, if your research area is not included as the most probable candidate!

  • • I will present the most probable scenario by my own view.

    • What would be a future innovations for next 60 years?

    • Please not be disappointed in that case!

    • I am very sorry, if your research area is not included as the most probable candidate!

  • • I will present the most probable scenario by my own view.

    • What would be a future innovations for next 60 years?

    • Please not be disappointed in that case!

    • I am very sorry, if your research area is not included as the most probable candidate!

    • Because, even the 5 most important innovations in the past were not recognized by Nobel Prize.

  • • I will present the most probable scenario by my own view.

    • What would be a future innovations for next 60 years?

    • Please not be disappointed in that case!

    • I am very sorry, if your research area is not included as the most probable candidate!

    • Because, even the 5 most important innovations in the past were not recognized by Nobel Prize.

    • You have even a higer a chance, because Nobel Prize will be given to those accomplished mission-impossible (like Akasaki & Amaya or Nakamura)!.

  • (1970) 10 μm 8 μm 6 μm 4 μm 3 μm 2 μm 1.2 μm

    0.8 μm 0.5 μm 0.35 μm 0.25 μm 180 nm 130 nm

    90 nm 65 nm 45 nm 32 nm (28 nm ) 22 nm(2012)

    Feature Size / Technology Node

    From 1970 to 2013 (Last year)

    18 generationsLine width: 1/450

    Area: 1/200,000

    43 years 1 generation2.5 years

    Line width: 1/1.43 = 0.70

    Area: 1/2 = 0.5

    14 nm (2014)

    57

  • More Moore to More More Moore

    65nm 45nm 32nm

    Technology node

    M. Bohr, pp.1, IEDM2011 (Intel)P. Packan, pp.659, IEDM2009 (Intel)C. Auth et al., pp.131, VLSI2012 (Intel)T. B. Hook, pp.115, IEDM2011 (IBM)S. Bangsaruntip et al., pp.297, IEDM2009 (IBM)

    Lg 35nm Lg 30nm

    Main stream(Fin,Tri, Nanowire)

    22nm 14nm 10nm, 7nm, 5nm, 3.5nm

    Alternative

    Alternative (III-V/Ge) Channel FinFET

    Emerging Devices

    Tri-Gate

    Now Future

    Si channelSi

    Others

    (FDSOI)

    Planar

    Si is still main stream for future !! FD: Fully Depleted

    58

  • High-k gate dielectrics

    Continued research and development

    SiO2 IL (Interfacial Layer) is used at Si interface to realize good mobility

    Technology for direct contact of high-k and Si is necessary

    Remote SiO2-IL scavengingHfO2 (IBM)

    EOT=0.52 nm

    Si

    La-silicate

    MG

    Direct contact with La-silicate (Tokyo.Tech)

    T. Ando, et al., p.423, IEDM2009, (IBM) T. Kawanago, et al., T-ED, vol. 59, no. 2, p. 269, 2012 (Tokyo Tech.)

    K. Mistry, et al., p.247, IEDM 2007, (Intel)

    TiN

    HfO2

    Si

    SiO2EOT=0.9nmHfO2/SiO2(IBM)

    T.C. Chen, et al., p.8, VLSI 2009, (IBM)

    Hf-based oxides

    45nmEOT:1nm

    32nmEOT:0.95nm

    22nmEOT:0.9nm

    10nm, 7nm, 5nm, 3.5nm,

    K. Kakushima, et al., p.8, IWDTF 2008, (Tokyo Tech.)

    EOT=0.37nm EOT=0.40nm EOT=0.48nm

    0.48 → 0.37nm Increase of Id at 30%

    14nmEOT:0.?nm

    59

  • http://download.intel.com/newsroom/kits/14nm/pdfs/Intel_14nm_New_uArch.pdf

    Merit for downsizing to 14 nm (Intel case)

    Merit for cost, power consumption, and performance

    60

  • http://download.intel.com/newsroom/kits/14nm/pdfs/Intel_14nm_New_uArch.pdf

    Interconnects

    SRAM Cell

    Intel 14nm Technology by Mark Bohr, August 11. 2014

    61

  • Near term until 2025 (in 10 years)

    ?

  • Near term until 2025 (in 10 years)

    Si-CMOS deep-miniaturization

    Very difficult because of :

    1. Subtheshlod leakage current increase.

    2. Mobility degradation with deceasing EOT and tSi3. Problem for EUV lithography

    4. C & R increase for interconnects

    5. Variability, yield, reliability problem

  • Vg (V)1

    0.3 V

    0.5 V 1.0 V

    Ion

    Ioff

    Id (A/µm)

    10-7

    10-5

    10-11

    10-9

    Vd

    Vth

    0.15 V

    0 0.5

    Subthreshold leakage current

    Electron EnergyBoltzmann statics

    Exp (qV/kT)

    Lg 1/2Vd, Vg 1/2Vth 1/2

    Ioff 103 in this exampleHowever

    Because of log-linear dependence64

  • 0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

    EOT (nm)

    Mob

    ility

    (cm

    2 /Vse

    c)

    at 1 MV/cm

    Open : Hf-based oxidesSolid : La-silicate oxide

    K. Uchida et al., pp.47, IEDM2002 (Toshiba)T. Kawanago, et al., (Tokyo Tech.) T-ED, 2012

    T. Ando, et al., (IBM) IEDM 2009L.-Å. Ragnarsson, et al., (IMEC) Microelectron. Eng,. 2011.

    2015 2017 2019 20252021 2023 20272013Year10 7 5 1.83.5 2.5 1.314Commercial name (nm)

    6.1 5.1 4.3 2.53.6 3.0 2.07.4TSi (nm) 0.73 0.67 0.61 0.470.56 0.51 0.430.80EOT (nm)

    ITRS 2013

    tox tSiµ µ

    65

  • µ(mobility) degradation

    tSi Si

    tSi

    Si

    tSi

    Si

    tSi

    Nano-wire Fin / Tri

    SOI

    tox

    µ

    Gate electrode

    Si channel

    Gate oxidetox

    Gate stack

    Metal/Oxideinterface

    dd

    d

    d

    d

    dd

    d dd

    dd

    d

    Si surface

    d

    Strong interaction betweencarriers and metal/oxide interface

    Strong interaction betweencarriers and Si surface (or interface)

    µ

    d

    66

  • Carrier density decrease

    2015 2017 2019 20252021 2023 20272013Year10 7 5 1.83.5 2.5 1.314Commercial name (nm)

    6.1 5.1 4.3 2.53.6 3.0 2.07.4TSi (nm)

    ITRS 2013

    tSi Volume DOS Carrier density

    Si nanowireband structure

    1 nm 2 nm 3 nm 4 nm 6 nm

    Iwata et al., Journal of Computational Physics 229 (2010) 2339–2363

    Diameter

    67

  • Near term until 2025 (in 10 years)

    Let us see what ITRS says about futureminiaturization!

  • 2015 2017 2019 20252021 2023 20272013

    10 7 5 ?3.5 ? ?14

    Year

    Commercial name (nm)

    ITRS 2013 (Published in April 2014)

    What about below 3 nm?Continue to miniaturize

    69

  • 2015 2017 2019 20252021 2023 20272013

    10 7 5 ?3.5 ? ?14

    Year

    Commercial name (nm)

    ITRS 2013 (Published in April 2014)

    Reach limit after 2021?

    Below 3 nm?

    70

  • 2015 2017 2019 20252021 2023 20272013

    10 7 5 1.83.5 2.5 1.314

    Year

    Commercial name (nm)

    ITRS 2013 (Published in April 2014)

    Not limit at all ! Even 1.3 nm technology!!

    71

  • 2015 2017 2019 20252021 2023 20272013

    10 7 5 1.83.5 2.5 1.314

    ? ? ? ?? ? ??

    Year

    Half pitch (HP) (nm)

    Commercial technologyname (nm)

    ITRS 2013 (Published in April 2014)

    What about HP?

    72

  • 2015 2017 2019 20252021 2023 20272013

    10 7 5 1.83.5 2.5 1.314

    32 25.3 20 1015.9 12.6 840

    Year

    Half pitch (HP) (nm)

    CommercialTechnology name (nm)

    ITRS 2013 (Published in April 2014)

    Much larger than the commercial technolgyname

    73

  • 2015 2017 2019 20252021 2023 20272013

    10 7 5 1.83.5 2.5 1.314

    32 25.3 20 1015.9 12.6 840

    16.8 14.0 11.7 6.79.7 8.1 5.620.2

    Year

    Lg (nm)

    Half pitch (HP) (nm)

    Commercial technologyname (nm)

    ITRS 2013 (Published in April 2014)

    Lg is also larger than the name.

    74

  • 2015 2017 2019 20252021 2023 20272013

    10 7 5 1.83.5 2.5 1.314

    32 25.3 20 1015.9 12.6 840

    16.8 14.0 11.7 6.79.7 8.1 5.620.2

    Year

    Lg (nm)

    Half pitch (HP) (nm)

    Commercial technologyname (nm)

    ITRS 2013 (Published in April 2014)

    So, people will be disappointed by the gap between the name and reality.

    gap

    75

  • 2015 2017 2019 20252021 2023 20272013

    10 7 5 1.83.5 2.5 1.314

    32 25.3 20 1015.9 12.6 840

    16.8 14.0 11.7 6.79.7 8.1 5.620.2

    Year

    Lg (nm)

    Half pitch (HP) (nm)

    Commercial name (nm)

    ITRS 2013 (Published in April 2014)

    Now, HP: X 0.80 / 2 years, Lg: X 0.83 / 2 years Thus, now more generations and more years until reaching limit

    Before, HP: X 0.70 / 2 years, Lg: X 0.70 / 2 years

    76

  • ITRS 2013 (Just published in April 2014)

    Lg (nm)Metal half pitch (nm) Commercial name (nm)

    Vdd (V) EOT (nm)

    TSi (nm)

    X 0.70 / 2 yearsX 0.80 / 2 yearsX 0.83 / 2 yearsX 0.96 / 2 yearsX 0.91 / 2 years

    X 0.84 / 2 years

    Only the commercial names decreases X0.7/ 2 years

    Year 20271.3 (nm)

    8 (nm)5.6 (nm)

    0.43 (nm)0.65 (V)

    2.0 (nm)

    Year 201314 (nm)40 (nm)

    20.2 (nm)

    0.80 (nm)0.86 (V)

    7.4 (nm)

    Difference between the commercial name andphysical parameters becomes larger

    1.3 nm technology!but HP = 8nm

    Lg = 5.6 nm

    Recently, companies become not to disclose Lg values at conferences

    77

  • However, careful about the commercial name of technology!

    22 nm Technology by Intel

    Lg (Gate length) = 30 nm (HP), 34 nm (MP), 34 nm or larger (SP) IEDM 2012, VLSI 2013

    10 nm Technology by Leti (FD-SOI)

    Lg (Gate length) = 25 nm Euro SOI 2014

    Recently, Gate length (Lg) is much larger than the Technology name

    14 nm Technology by Global

    Lg (Gate length) = 15 nm ECS Fall 201378

  • Near term until 2025 (in 10 years) Possible solutions

    a) Less-aggressive shrink rate to extend the endb) Integration to vertical directionc) Decrease production cost

    1. Stick to Si-CMOS device

    2. Change channel materials (Alternative channel)a) InGaAs NMOS / Ge PMOS

    c) 2D material with Bandgap; MoS2, etc.b) Carbon channel; Graphene/CNT

    3. Change operational mechanism (New mechanism) a) T(Tunneling)-FET

    d) Spin transistor, etc.

    b) RTD (Resonance Tunneling Diode)c) SET (Single Electron transistor)

  • Near term until 2025 (in 10 years)

    1. Stick to Si-CMOS device

    2. Alternative channel

    Low-risk/Low-return: Possible solution

    High-risk/High-return: Not likely, but chance for Novel Prize

    3. New mechanismSome of them already shows superior characteristics as a single device, while most of not.

    However, very few report for circuit level performance, large size wafer, variability, yield (defect), reliability, etc.,necessary for production.

  • Middle term from 2025 to 2045 (10 to 30 years)

    What will be the our society after 30 years?

  • What will be the our society after 30 years?

    Wearable What is next?

  • What will be the our society after 30 years?

    Wearable Minimum Wearing

  • What will be the our society after 30 years?

    Wearable Minimum/No Wearing

  • What will be the our society after 30 years?

    Wearable Minimum/No Wearing

    We do not want bring, many electronic items,such as smart-phone, battery charger, extra battery, PC, etc.

  • What will be the our society after 30 years?

    Wearable Minimum/No Wearing

    We do not want bring, many electronic items,such as smart-phone, battery charger, extra battery, PC, etc.

    Everywhere in the environment, sensor to detect what human want to do,

  • What will be the our society after 30 years?

    Wearable Minimum/No Wearing

    We do not want bring, many electronic items,such as smart-phone, battery charger, extra battery, PC, etc.

    Everywhere in the environment, sensor to detect what human want to do, display to watch,

  • What will be the our society after 30 years?

    Wearable Minimum/No Wearing

    We do not want bring, many electronic items,such as smart-phone, battery charger, extra battery, PC, etc.

    Everywhere in the environment, sensor to detect what human want to do, display to watch, speaker to listen,

  • What will be the our society after 30 years?

    Wearable Minimum/No Wearing

    We do not want bring, many electronic items,such as smart-phone, battery charger, extra battery, PC, etc.

    Everywhere in the environment, sensor to detect what human want to do, display to watch, speaker to listen, wireless power supply if necessary, ….

  • What will be the our society after 30 years?

    Wearable Minimum/No Wearing

    We do not want bring, many electronic items,such as smart-phone, battery charger, extra battery, PC, etc.

    Everywhere in the environment, sensor to detect what human want to do, display to watch, speaker to listen, wireless power supply if necessary, ….

  • Wearable Minimum/No Wearing

    Thus, burden to the data processing of the smart phone will become light. And even no mobile smart phone may be necessary,

  • Wearable Minimum/No Wearing

    Thus, burden to the data processing of the smart phone will become light. And even no mobile smart phone may be necessary,

    Sensor, short length wireless communication, display maybe powered by solar cell and operated by small scale microprocessor, will become more important.

  • What will be LSI fabrication process in 2030?

    Today’s large size wafer process is necessary?

    There are no miniaturization, thus cost reduction for fabrication by new concept will become important.

    Today’s large clean room necessary?

    For example, how about the chip size fabrication with many parallel chips on belt conveyer?

  • Middle term from 2025 to 2045 (10 to 30 years)

    For minimum/no wearing?

    Smart sensor, short length communication,display, speaker, well-distributed in the environment operated by small microprocessor and powered by solar cell.

    For fabrication cost reduction?

    New fabrication process idea is necessary.

  • Long term from 2045 to 2075 (30 to 60 years)

    ???

  • Long term from 2045 to 2075 (30 to 60 years)

    Direct communication between electron device and bio system / brain (insect/animal/human)

    Use brain (insect/animal) for data processing

    Self-assembly by using DNA.

    Introduce the brain algorithm into semiconductor microprocessor.

  • Brain Ultra small volumeSmall number of neuron cellsExtremely low power

    Real time image processing(Artificial) Intelligence3D flight control

    Sensor

    InfraredHumidityCO2

    Mosquito

    Dragonfly is further highperformance

    System andAlgorism becomes more important!

    But do not know how?

  • Long term from 2045 to 2075 (30 to 60 years)

    Self-assembling using DNA.

    A kind of dream.

  • Long term from 2045 to 2075 (30 to 60 years)

    Self-assembling using DNA.

    A kind of dream.

    Assembling a device structure such like coral designed by DNA.

  • Thank you very much for your attention

    スライド番号 1スライド番号 2スライド番号 3スライド番号 4スライド番号 5スライド番号 6スライド番号 7スライド番号 8スライド番号 9スライド番号 10スライド番号 11スライド番号 12スライド番号 13スライド番号 14スライド番号 15スライド番号 16スライド番号 17スライド番号 18スライド番号 19スライド番号 20スライド番号 21スライド番号 22スライド番号 23スライド番号 24スライド番号 25スライド番号 26スライド番号 27スライド番号 28スライド番号 29スライド番号 30スライド番号 31スライド番号 32スライド番号 33スライド番号 34スライド番号 35スライド番号 36スライド番号 37スライド番号 38スライド番号 39スライド番号 40スライド番号 41スライド番号 42スライド番号 43スライド番号 44スライド番号 45スライド番号 46スライド番号 47スライド番号 48スライド番号 49スライド番号 50スライド番号 51スライド番号 52スライド番号 53スライド番号 54スライド番号 55スライド番号 56スライド番号 57スライド番号 58スライド番号 59スライド番号 60スライド番号 61スライド番号 62スライド番号 63スライド番号 64スライド番号 65スライド番号 66スライド番号 67スライド番号 68スライド番号 69スライド番号 70スライド番号 71スライド番号 72スライド番号 73スライド番号 74スライド番号 75スライド番号 76スライド番号 77スライド番号 78スライド番号 79スライド番号 80スライド番号 81スライド番号 82スライド番号 83スライド番号 84スライド番号 85スライド番号 86スライド番号 87スライド番号 88スライド番号 89スライド番号 90スライド番号 91スライド番号 92スライド番号 93スライド番号 94スライド番号 95スライド番号 96スライド番号 97スライド番号 98スライド番号 99スライド番号 100