February 13, 2020 - North Dakota€¦ · February 13, 2020 Page 3 of 25 It was moved by Commissioner Pedersen and seconded by Commissioner Goehring that under the provision of NDCC

February 13, 2020 Page 1 of 25

MINUTES

North Dakota State Water Commission Bismarck, North Dakota

February 13, 2020

The North Dakota State Water Commission (SWC or Commission) held a meeting at the State Capitol, Brynhild Haugland Room, Bismarck, North Dakota, on February 13, 2020. Governor Burgum called the meeting to order at 12:37 p.m. A quorum was present. STATE WATER COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Governor Burgum, Chairman Doug Goehring, Commissioner, ND Department of Agriculture, Bismarck Michael Anderson, Hillsboro Katie Hemmer, Jamestown Richard Johnson, Devils Lake Matthew Pedersen, Valley City Jay Volk, Bismarck Steven Schneider, Dickinson Jason Zimmerman, Minot OTHERS PRESENT: Lt. Governor Sanford Garland Erbele, State Engineer, and Chief Engineer-Secretary SWC Staff Jennifer Verleger, General Counsel, Attorney General’s Office Reice Haase, Policy Advisor, Governor’s Office Leslie Bakke-Oliver, General Counsel, Governor’s Office Approximately 100 people interested in agenda items.

CONSIDERATION OF AGENDA The agenda for the February 13, 2020, SWC meeting was presented. Agenda item F. Executive Session, was moved after D. SWC Financial Reports.

CONSIDERATION OF DRAFT MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 6, 2019,

DECEMBER 20, 2019, AND JANUARY 16, 2020 MEETINGS The draft minutes for the December 6 and December 20, 2019, and January 16, 2020, meetings were reviewed. There were no modifications.

It was moved by Commissioner Hemmer, seconded by Commissioner Johnson, and unanimously carried, that the minutes for December 6 and December 20, 2019, and January 16, 2020, be approved as presented.


STATE WATER COMMISSION FINANCIAL REPORTS The allocated program expenditures for the period ending December 31, 2019, were presented and discussed by Heide Delorme, Director of Administrative Services. The total expenditures were within the authorized budget amounts. A bar chart summarizing project expenditures and commitments and Project Summary for the 2019-2021 Biennium, APPENDIX A, provided information on the committed and uncommitted funds from the Resources Trust Fund and the Water Development Trust Fund. The final summary for projects showed approved projects totaling $459,087,298 with expenditures of $62,659,023. A balance of $243,121,286 remains available to commit to projects in the 2019-2021 biennium. The oil extraction tax deposits into the Resources Trust Fund total $108,457,582 through January 2020 and are $3,367,015 or 3.2 percent above budgeted revenues. The budgeted revenue for the biennium is $433 million.

EXECUTIVE SESSION UNDER AUTHORITY OF NDCC § 44-04-19.1(9) FOR ATTORNEY CLIENT CONSULTATION REGARDING DEVILS LAKE WEST END

OUTLET SETTLEMENT

It was the recommendation of Governor Burgum, Chairman, that the discussion relating to the Devils Lake West End Outlet settlement be held in executive session, under the provisions of NDCC § 44-04-19.1(9), for the purpose of attorney consultation. The State Water Commission invited the following to participate in the executive session: STATE WATER COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Governor Burgum, Chairman Doug Goehring, Commissioner, ND Department of Agriculture, Bismarck Michael Anderson, Hillsboro Katie Hemmer, Jamestown Richard Johnson, Devils Lake Matthew Pedersen, Valley City Jay Volk, Bismarck Steven Schneider, Dickinson Jason Zimmerman, Minot OTHERS PRESENT: Lt. Governor Sanford Garland Erbele, State Engineer, and Chief Engineer-Secretary State Water Commission staff: John Paczkowski, Jon Kelsch, Tim Dodd, Duane Pool, and Cheryl Fitzgerald Jennifer Verleger, General Counsel, Attorney General’s Office Leslie Bakken-Oliver, General Counsel, Governor’s Office Reice Haase, Policy Advisor, Governor’s Office


It was moved by Commissioner Pedersen and seconded by Commissioner Goehring that under the provision of NDCC §44-04-19.1(9), the State Water Commission proceed into executive session on February 13, 2020, at 12:44 p.m., for the purpose of attorney consultation relating to the Devils Lake West End Outlet settlement. Commissioners Anderson, Hemmer, Johnson, Pedersen, Schneider, Volk, Zimmerman, Goehring, and Governor Burgum voted aye. There were no nay votes. Governor Burgum announced the motion unanimously carried.

Following attorney consultation regarding the Devils Lake West End Outlet settlement, Governor Burgum reconvened the open session of the State Water Commission meeting on February 13, 2020, at 1:06 p.m., and the following motion was made:

It was moved by Commissioner Goehring and seconded by Commissioner Schneider that the SWC attorney finalize the mediated settlement agreement on the Devils Lake West End Outlet with the Mays. Commissioners Anderson, Hemmer, Johnson, Pedersen, Schneider, Volk, Zimmerman, Goehring, and Governor Burgum voted aye. There were no nay votes. Governor Burgum announced the motion unanimously carried.

STATE COST-SHARE REQUESTS Jeffrey Mattern, Engineer Manager, presented summaries of the Water Supply and Rural Water Funding and cost-share requests for Water Supply, Rural Water, and Federal MR&I projects with the exception of the Mandan New Raw Water Intake project, presented by Heide Delorme, Administration Division Director. WATER SUPPLY PROJECTS: MANDAN: NEW RAW WATER INTAKE - $10,977,000 (SWC Project No. 2050MAN) In June 2019, Mandan received cost-share for construction of a new raw water intake to improve the capacity for both residential services and the Marathon Refinery. The project was approved for $10,977,000 with $9,570,000 from 2019-2021 biennium funds, and $1,407,000 from 2017-2019 biennium funds. Based on Section 7 of Senate Bill 2020 from the 2019 legislative session, a condition on carryover funds was the funds may be used only for project carryover. Dickinson’s de-obligated water supply carryover funding is $1,731,926, and could be used to decrease 2019-2021 biennium funds approved for Mandan. This would increase funding for other 2019-2021 projects. Heide proposed the approved


$10,977,000 be funded with $7,840,000 from 2019-2021 biennium funds, and $3,137,000 from 2017-2019 biennium funds as shown below. Project 2017-2019 2019-2021 Total Dickinson Capital Project Balance ($1,731,926) $0 ($1,731,926) 2017-2019 Carryover Funds $1,730,000 ($1,730,000) ($0) Mandan Raw Water Intake $1,407,000 $9,570,000 $10,977,000 Recommended Total for Mandan Intake $3,137,000 $7,840,000 $10,977,000

The recommendation was to approve up to $3,137,000 in 2017-2019 biennium carryover funds with the remaining $7,840,000 from 2019-2021 biennium funding for a total cost-share of no more than $10,977,000.

It was moved by Commission Goehring and seconded by Commissioner Hemmer the Commission approve up to $3,137,000 in 2017-2019 biennium carryover funds for the Mandan Raw Water Intake, with the remaining $7,840,000 from 2019-2021 biennium funding, for a total cost-share of no more than $10,977,000, as previously approved. The funding is in the form of 60 percent cost-share towards eligible costs, and is contingent on available funding. Commissioners Anderson, Hemmer, Johnson, Pedersen, Schneider, Volk, Zimmerman, Goehring, and Governor Burgum voted aye. There were no nay votes. Governor Burgum announced the motion carried.

WESTERN AREA WATER SUPPLY AUTHORITY (WAWSA): PHASE 4 CARRYOVER TO PHASE 5 EXPANSIONS – REALLOCATION OF $3,001,967 (SWC Project No. 1973) WAWSA requested reallocation of 2017-2019 WAWSA Phase IV carryover funds to WAWSA Phase V. Phase IV and Phase V are projects that were funded in previous biennia and carried over to the current biennium. Based on Section 7 of Senate Bill 2020 from the 2019 legislative session, a condition on carryover funds is they may be used only for project carryover.

The estimated Phase IV project cost was $80,000,000, with cost-share of 35 percent on pre-construction costs and 75 percent on construction costs, for a total cost-share of $60,000,000. Phase IV was completed under budget with $3,001,967 remaining as carryover funds from the 2017-2019 biennium.

The previous estimated cost for Phase V was $33,052,000, with cost-share of 35 percent on pre-construction costs, and 75 percent on construction costs, for a total cost-share of $22,400,000. The December 2019 balance for Phase V is $1,762,865. The current estimated Phase V project cost is $39,000,000. Project cost increases are due to additional users and an increase in the water treatment plant pre-treatment construction cost. The estimated cost increase is $5.2 million from $10,376,000 in 2016, to the current 2019 estimate of $15,583,284.


Previous phases of the project were allowed the flexibility of carrying over funds as needed to maximize cost savings and schedule other improvements concurrently. The addition of new users to Phase V was done with the knowledge that Phase IV was under budget and the expectation that any remaining Phase IV cost-share would be reallocated to Phase V. The recommendation was to approve the reallocation of $3,001,967 from 2017-2019 carryover funds from Phase IV to Phase V.

It was moved by Commissioner Goehring and seconded by Commissioner Pedersen the Commission approve the reallocation of $3,001,967 in 2017-2019 carryover funds from WAWAS Phase IV to Phase V with state cost-share participation to remain at 35 percent of eligible pre-construction costs and 75 percent of construction costs. The approval is in addition to the previous $22,400,000 approved cost-share, for a total cost-share amount not to exceed $25,401,967. The approval is contingent on available funding. Commissioners Anderson, Hemmer, Johnson, Pedersen, Schneider, Volk, Zimmerman, Goehring, and Governor Burgum voted aye. There were no nay votes. Governor Burgum announced the motion carried.

GARRISON: WATER SUPPLY TREATMENT AND TRANSMISSION LINE – $3,396,000 (SWC Project No. 2050GRR)

Garrison requested cost-share for the rehabilitation of their 1992 water treatment plant and looping of a transmission line to increase the capacity of the system.

The life cycle cost analysis compared four alternatives and the preferred alternative was to rehabilitate the existing treatment system.

Garrison plans to fund the local share of the project through the Drinking Water State Revolving Loan Fund. The total eligible cost is $5,660,000.

The project was in the 2019 Water Plan and meets requirements of the Commission’s cost-share policy for municipal water supply projects. The recommendation was to provide cost-share at 60 percent of eligible costs in the amount of $3,396,000.

It was moved by Commissioner Goehring and seconded by Commissioner Hemmer the Commission approve the request of Garrison for state cost-share participation at 60 percent of eligible costs for the water treatment plant and transmission line at an amount not to exceed $3,396,000. The approval is contingent on available funding for the 2019-2021 biennium.


Commissioners Anderson, Hemmer, Johnson, Pedersen, Schneider, Volk, Zimmerman, Goehring, and Governor Burgum voted aye. There were no nay votes. Governor Burgum announced the motion carried.

LARIMORE: 2020 WATER SYSTEM REPLACEMENT - $2,617,000 (SWC Project No. 2050LAR) Larimore requested cost-share for the replacement of a water distribution system, including 45,000 feet of water main, 36 fire hydrants, and over 400 user connections. Replacement of their aging infrastructure would make it financially more feasible for the future-planned connection to East Central Regional Water District. The life cycle cost analysis considered one alternative to replace the distribution system with PVC piping, ductile fittings, and valves. The estimated total cost is $4,473,024. Policy requires ineligible items to be excluded from cost-share for funding contributions provided by other state entities that supplant costs. Larimore will receive a $111,357 Community Development Block Grant. The total eligible cost is $4,361,667, with 60 percent cost-share of $2,617,000. The local share of the project would be a loan from the Drinking Water State Revolving Loan Fund, covered by city sales tax, special assessments, and a utility rates increase. The project was in the 2019 Water Plan and meets requirements of the Commission’s cost-share policy for municipal water supply projects. The recommendation was to provide cost-share at 60 percent of eligible costs in the amount of $2,617,000.

It was moved by Commissioner Pedersen and seconded by Commissioner Volk the Commission approve the request of Larimore for state cost-share participation at 60 percent of eligible costs for the water system replacement at an amount not to exceed $2,617,000. The approval is contingent on available funding for the 2019-2021 biennium.


PARK RIVER: 2020 WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENT - $970,000 (SWC Project No. 2050PAR)

Park River requested cost-share for the replacement of deteriorating cast iron water mains. Prioritization was given to approximately 10 city blocks most affected by recent water main breaks.

The life cycle cost analysis compared the alternative of replacing water mains to the “Do Nothing” alternative which is insufficient to address ongoing pipe failures. Park River will fund the local share of the project through the Drinking Water State Revolving Loan Fund.


The project is in the 2019 Water Plan and meets requirements of the Commission’s cost-share policy for municipal water supply projects. The total eligible cost is $1,616,667. The recommendation was to provide cost-share at 60 percent in the amount of $970,000.

It was moved by Commissioner Goehring and seconded by Commissioner Volk the Commission approve the request from Park River for state cost-share participation at 60 percent of eligible costs for water main improvements at an amount not to exceed $970,000. The approval is contingent on available funding for the 2019-2021 biennium.


SYKESTON: WATER TOWER REPLACEMENT - $587,000 (SWC Project No. 2050SYK) Sykeston requested cost-share for the construction of a new 50,000-gallon elevated water tower to replace an existing 50,000-gallon tower to meet water demands for domestic and fire. The life cycle cost analysis considered three alternatives and the preferred alternative was the new elevated tower. The estimated total cost is $1,070,333. Policy requires ineligible items be excluded from cost-share for funding contributions provided by other state entities that supplant costs. Sykeston will receive a $72,000 Community Development Block Grant. The total eligible cost is $978,333, with 60 percent cost-share in the amount of $587,000. The local share of the project would be from the Drinking Water State Revolving Loan Fund. The project is in the 2019 Water Plan and meets requirements of the Commission’s cost-share policy for municipal water supply projects. The recommendation was to provide cost-share at 60 percent in the amount of $587,000.

It was moved by Commissioner Goehring and seconded by Commissioner Hemmer the Commission approve the request from Sykeston for state cost-share participation at 60 percent of eligible costs for the water tower replacement at an amount not to exceed $587,000. The approval is contingent on available funding for the 2019-2021 biennium. Commissioners Anderson, Hemmer, Johnson, Pedersen, Schneider, Volk, Zimmerman, Goehring, and Governor Burgum voted aye. There were no nay votes. Governor Burgum announced the motion carried.


VALLEY CITY: WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS 100/101 - $700,000 (SWC Project No. 2050VAL)

Valley City requested cost-share for the replacement of 10 blocks of aging cast iron water mains.

The life cycle cost analysis considered two alternatives and the preferred alternative was the open cut alternative. Valley City will fund the local share of the project through assessments, local sales tax, and income from an infrastructure fund.

The project is in the 2019 Water Plan and meets requirements of the Commission’s cost-share policy for municipal water supply projects. The estimated total eligible cost is $1,166,667. The recommendation was to provide cost-share at 60 percent in the amount of $700,000.

It was moved by Commissioner Zimmerman and seconded by Commissioner Volk the Commission approve the request from Valley City for state cost-share participation at 60 percent of eligible costs for the water main improvement projects at an amount not to exceed $700,000. The approval is contingent on available funding for the 2019-2021 biennium.


WYNDMERE: WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS - $1,730,000 (SWC Project No. 2050WYN) Wyndmere requested cost-share for the water system portion of its larger water, sewer, and street replacement project. Mixed-type piping and a high water table have been major contributors to the degradation of the water mains.

The life cycle cost analysis considered three alternatives and the preferred alternative was to complete replacement to significantly reduce operating and maintenance costs related to storm water and street repairs. Valley City will fund the local share through the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Loan paid through an increase in the base water rate. The storm sewer project will be funded through a Clean Water State Revolving Fund loan paid through assessments.

The project is in the 2019 Water Plan and meets requirements of the Commission’s cost-share policy for municipal water supply projects. The eligible total cost is $2,883,333. The recommendation was to provide cost-share at 60 percent in the amount of $1,730,000.

It was moved by Commissioner Volk and seconded by Commissioner Pedersen the Commission approve the request from Wyndmere for state cost-share participation at 60 percent of eligible


costs for the water main improvement project at an amount not to exceed $1,730,000. The approval is contingent on available funding for the 2019-2021 biennium. Commissioners Anderson, Hemmer, Johnson, Pedersen, Schneider, Volk, Zimmerman, Goehring, and Governor Burgum voted aye. There were no nay votes. Governor Burgum announced the motion carried.

FARGO: DOWNTOWN WATER TOWER - $2,814,000 (SWC Project No. 2050FAR) Fargo requested cost-share for a new two million-gallon elevated water tower to replace three existing water towers in order to meet water demands with adequate pressure and fire flows in the far north, south, and west extents of the system, and meet capacity for downtown development. The life cycle cost analysis included three alternatives. The preferred alternative was the two million-gallon alternative. The local share of the project is programmed into Fargo’s capital improvement plan and revenues will cover their 50 percent using reserve funds. The project is in the 2019 Water Plan and meets requirements of the Commission’s cost-share policy for municipal water supply projects. The estimated total eligible cost is $5,628,000. The recommendation was to provide 50 percent of eligible costs in the amount of $2,814,000.

It was moved by Commissioner Hemmer and seconded by Commissioner Pedersen the Commission approve the request from Fargo for state cost-share participation at 50 percent of eligible costs for the downtown water tower project at an amount not to exceed $2,814,000. The approval is contingent on available funding.


LINCOLN: WATER TANK REPLACEMENT - $1,268,000 (SWC Project No. 2050LIN) Lincoln requested cost-share for constructing a new one million-gallon water storage tank to replace one of their two existing glass-fused 500,000-gallon tanks. The life cycle cost analysis considered three alternatives and the preferred alternative, the concrete tank, had the lowest present value cost of $2,182,000. Lincoln will fund the local share of the project through the Drinking Water State Revolving Loan Fund.


The project is in the 2019 Water Plan and meets requirements of the Commission’s cost-share policy for municipal water supply projects. The estimated eligible total cost is $2,113,300. The recommendation was to provide cost-share of 60 percent in the amount of $1,268,000.

It was moved by Commissioner Volk and seconded by Commissioner Goehring the Commission approve the request from Lincoln for state cost-share participation at 60 percent of eligible costs for the water tank replacement project at an amount not to exceed $1,268,000. The approval is contingent on available funding for the 2019-2021 biennium. Commissioners Anderson, Hemmer, Johnson, Pedersen, Schneider, Volk, Zimmerman, Goehring, and Governor Burgum voted aye. There were no nay votes. Governor Burgum announced the motion carried.

KINDRED: WATER MAIN LOOP - $134,000 (SWC Project No. 2050KIN)

Kindred requested cost-share for the construction of a water main loop in their distribution system in order to improve water quality, provide redundancy, and improve fire flows across the system. The recent completion of a new water tower will accommodate future demands for supply, but improvements are needed to the distribution system.

The life cycle cost analysis considered two water main looping alternatives and preferred alternative two, which considers future development, improves fire flow, and additional water service. Kindred will fund the local share of the project through the Bank of North Dakota’s Infrastructure Loan Fund.

The project is in the 2019 Water Plan and meets requirements of the Commission’s cost-share policy for municipal water supply projects. The estimated eligible total cost is $223,333. The recommendation was to provide cost-share at 60 percent in the amount of $134,000.

It was moved by Commissioner Goehring and seconded by Commissioner Pedersen the Commission approve the request from Kindred for state cost-share participation at 60 percent of eligible costs for the water main looping project at an amount not to exceed $134,000. The approval is contingent on available funding for the 2019-2021 biennium.



HAZEN: WATER STORAGE IMPROVEMENTS - $1,430,000 (SWC Project No. 2050HAZ) Hazen requested cost-share for constructing a new 750,000-gallon water storage tank. Hazen has experienced low water pressure in the higher elevation areas of the system as well as deterioration of the interior and exterior coatings on the water tower. The life cycle cost analysis considered four alternatives and the preferred alternative was a new concrete tank at a different higher elevation site, which offers lower maintenance costs and corrects the low pressure issue. Hazen will fund the local share of the project through the Drinking Water State Revolving Loan Fund. The project is in the 2019 Water Plan and meets requirements of the Commission’s cost-share policy for municipal water supply projects. The estimated eligible total cost is $2,383,333. The recommendation was to provide cost-share at 60 percent in the amount of $1,430,000.

It was moved by Commissioner Schneider and seconded by Commissioner Hemmer the Commission approve the request from Hazen for state cost-share participation at 60 percent of eligible costs for the water storage improvements at an amount not to exceed $1,430,000. The approval is contingent on available funding for the 2019-2021 biennium. Commissioners Anderson, Hemmer, Johnson, Pedersen, Schneider, Volk, Zimmerman, Goehring, and Governor Burgum voted aye. There were no nay votes. Governor Burgum announced the motion carried.

WILLISTON: WATER MAIN EXTENSIONS - $1,196,000 (SWC Project No. 2050WLL)

Williston requested cost-share for the extension of water mains on 16th Avenue and 42nd Street totaling 11,800 feet.

The life cycle cost analysis considered one alternative to extend the water mains creating additional looping in the current system and allowing development. This project has a present value cost of $2,990,000. Williston will fund the local share of the project through local sales tax or gross production tax.

The project is in the 2019 Water Plan and meets requirements of the Commission’s cost-share policy for municipal water supply projects. The estimated total eligible cost is $2,746,300. A 60 percent cost-share would be $1,648,000. The 2019-2021 water supply funding balance available for this project is $1,196,000. Williston was contacted and they would accept the available balance towards the two water main projects. The recommendation was to provide cost-share at 60 percent in the amount not to exceed $1,196,000.


It was moved by Commissioner Pedersen and seconded by Commissioner Volk the Commission approve the request from Williston for state cost-share participation at 60 percent of eligible costs for the 16th Avenue and 42nd Street water main projects at an amount not to exceed $1,196,000. The approval is contingent on available funding for the 2019-2021 biennium. Commissioners Anderson, Hemmer, Johnson, Pedersen, Schneider, Volk, Zimmerman, Goehring, and Governor Burgum voted aye. There were no nay votes. Governor Burgum announced the motion carried.

RURAL WATER PROJECTS: SOUTHEAST WATER USERS DISTRICT: SYSTEM-WIDE EXPANSION - $225,000 (SWC Project No. 2050SOE) Southeast Water Users District (Southeast) submitted a request for additional cost-share on a previously approved project that added rural users to the system within Richland, Ransom, Sargent, LaMoure, Dickey, and Logan counties. The previous estimated total cost of $20,500,000 was approved for cost-share at 35 percent for pre-construction, and 75 percent for construction, in the amount of $14,540,000.

The life cycle cost analysis considered one alternative of extending water service with a present value cost of $22,018,000. The local share of the project would be funded with sign-up commitments from water users, system reserve funds, and the Drinking Water State Revolving Loan Fund.

The project encountered wet conditions in 2019 requiring additional pipeline borings. With approximately 20 miles of pipeline left to install, the estimated cost to complete the project is $300,000. The new estimated cost is $20,800,000. The previously approved cost-share of $14,540,000, combined with the current request, brings the total cost-share to $14,765,000. The project is in the 2019 Water Development Plan and meets requirements of the Commission’s cost-share policy for rural water supply projects. The recommendation was to provide cost-share of 75 percent for an additional $225,000.

It was moved by Commissioner Goehring and seconded by Commissioner Zimmerman the Commission approve the request from Southeast for state cost-share participation at 75 percent of eligible costs for the system-wide expansion project for an additional $225,000, with the total amount not to exceed $14,765,000. The approval is contingent on available funding for the 2019-2021 biennium. Commissioners Anderson, Hemmer, Johnson, Pedersen, Schneider, Volk, Zimmerman, Goehring, and Governor Burgum voted aye. There were no nay votes. Governor Burgum announced the motion carried.


STUTSMAN RURAL WATER DISTRICT: PHASE 7, REULE LAKE (SWC Project No. 2050STU)

Stutsman Rural Water District (Stutsman) requested a modification to the scope of the approved Phase 7 project to include service to water users in the Reule Lake area. The additional project would include installation of 21,600-feet of 4-inch transmission pipeline for potential service to over 65 water users with no additional cost-share funds. Stutsman received 30 additional sign-ups and anticipates enough funds will be available from the original Phase 7 project to address the Reule Lake addition.

Phase 7 had an estimated total cost of $2,787,693, was approved in June 2019 for 2019-2021 biennium cost-share at 65 percent in the amount of $1,812,000. Stutsman will fund the local share of the project through the Drinking Water State Revolving Loan Fund and also charge $600 for new customer sign-ups. The recommendation was to amend the Phase 7 scope to include service for the Reule Lake area with no additional cost-share.

It was moved by Commissioner Hemmer and seconded by Commissioner Schneider the Commission approve the request from Stutsman to amend the Phase 7 scope to include the Reule Lake area with no additional state cost-share. The approval is contingent on available funding for the 2019-2021 biennium. Commissioners Anderson, Hemmer, Johnson, Pedersen, Schneider, Volk, Zimmerman, Goehring, and Governor Burgum voted aye. There were no nay votes. Governor Burgum announced the motion carried.

FEDERAL MUNICIPAL, RURAL, AND INDUSTRIAL WATER SUPPLY PROJECTS: EASTERN NORTH DAKOTA ALTERNATE WATER SUPPLY: MCCLUSKY CANAL ALTERNATIVE - $885,000 (SWC Project No. 1912) Garrison Diversion Conservancy District (GDCD) requested federal Municipal, Rural, and Industrial Water Supply (MR&I) Program funding for engineering support towards the Eastern North Dakota Alternate Water Supply (ENDAWS) Project. GDCD requested the Bureau of Reclamation consider and evaluate up to 165 cfs of water from the McClusky Canal to serve as an alternate water supply for the Red River Valley Water Supply Project. This alternate water supply would provide a supplemental water supply in the event of drought conditions. In response to GDCD’s request for this alternate water supply, the Bureau of Reclamation is preparing an environmental impact statement (EIS). In order to prepare the EIS, the Bureau of Reclamation has tasked Black & Veatch Engineering with preparing an engineering analysis of options for the removal and conveyance of water from the McClusky Canal to the Red River Valley Water Supply Project. Black & Veatch was also tasked with reporting an appraisal level design and cost estimates for a biota


water treatment plant and various alternatives. The estimated total cost of the EIS engineering support is $885,000.

In December 2019, the U.S. Congress passed a FY2020 budget for the Bureau of Reclamation, which should exceed $15 million for the North Dakota state MR&I program. FY2020 dollars will be used to fund the request for ENDAWS. The recommendation was to approve federal MR&I funding in the amount of $885,000.

It was moved by Commissioner Goehring and seconded by Commissioner Pedersen the Commission approve federal MR&I funding of $885,000, to GDCD, for the ENDAWS EIS. The funding is contingent on available funding and that the project follows federal MR&I program requirements.


Pat Fridgen, Planning and Education Division Director, presented summaries of the General Water and Flood Control Funding and cost-share requests for General Water, Rural Flood Control, and Flood Control projects. GENERAL WATER PROJECTS: MAPLE RIVER WATER RESOURCE DISTRICT: MAPLE RIVER DAM SITE T-180 IMPROVEMENTS - $212,216 (SWC Project No. 1785) Maple River Water Resource District (Maple River) requested cost-share for the Maple River Dam Site T-180 improvements. The dam is classified as a high hazard dam and the purpose of the dam is flood control. The project would replace the spillway pipe that shows signs of deterioration, which includes fine cracking on top of the pipe and small gaps between sections of pipe.

The project meets requirements of the Commission’s cost-share policy for dam safety projects. The total eligible project cost is $282,955 for cost-share at 75 percent as a dam safety project in the amount of $212,216. The recommendation was to approve the request at 75 percent as a dam safety project in the amount of $212,216.

It was moved by Commissioner Hemmer and seconded by Commissioner Schneider the Commission approve the request by Maple River for cost-share participation of $212,216, at 75 percent of eligible costs for the Maple River Dam Site T-180 improvements. The approval is contingent on available funding. Commissioners Anderson, Hemmer, Johnson, Pedersen, Schneider, Volk, Zimmerman, Goehring, and Governor Burgum voted aye. There were no nay votes. Governor Burgum announced the motion carried.


SARGENT COUNTY WATER RESOURCE DISTRICT: SILVER LAKE DAM IMPROVEMENTS - $107,945 (SWC Project No. 0391) Sargent County Water Resource District (Sargent County) requested cost-share for the Silver Lake Dam improvements project. The dam is classified as a low hazard dam. Since it was constructed, the dam has served as a source of recreation along the Wild Rice River.

A report from February 2016 by the SWC identified that uncontrolled seepage conditions were present in the dam embankment. The project would mitigate water seepage through the embankment. The feasibility study completed in October 2019 considered a full breach, relocation, or remedial work. The result of the study was a recommendation that included the installation of a toe drain along the embankment of the existing spillway, maintaining the pool for recreational use, and protection to upstream structures. The sponsor requested 75 percent cost-share as a dam safety project – the cost-share percentage provided by the Commission for the feasibility study.

This project is included in the 2019 Water Development Plan and meets requirements of the Commission’s cost-share policy for recreation projects. The total eligible project cost is $269,864 for cost-share at 40 percent as a recreation project in the amount of $107,945. The recommendation was 40 percent cost-share as a recreation project, due to the purpose of the dam as recreation and because it is a low hazard dam.

After discussion on low, medium, and high hazard dam categories defined by Administrative Code 89-08 and SWC cost-share policy related to the dam safety program, recreational use of dams, and low-head dams, the following motion was made:

It was moved by Commissioner Goehring and seconded by Commissioner Anderson the Commission 1) approve the request from Sargent County for state cost-share participation of $107,945, at 40 percent of eligible costs for the Sargent County Silver Lake Dam improvements as a recreation project; and 2) discuss the project at the March 2020 subcommittee meeting to determine if the project may be approved at the original 75 percent cost-share request as a dam safety project rather than at 40 percent as a recreation project. The approval is contingent on available funding for the 2019-2021 biennium. Commissioners Anderson, Hemmer, Johnson, Pedersen, Schneider, Volk, Zimmerman, Goehring, and Governor Burgum voted aye. There were no nay votes. Governor Burgum announced the motion carried.


GOLDEN VALLEY COUNTY WATER RESOURCE DISTRICT: ODLAND DAM REHABILITATION PROJECT - $397,200 (SWC Project No. 0394) Golden Valley County Water Resource District (Golden Valley) requested cost-share for the Odland Dam rehabilitation project. The dam is classified as a low hazard dam. According to project sponsors, the dam is an important regional recreation and sport fishing destination.

A feasibility study was completed in November 2017. The project would replace the deteriorating primary spillway, fill in low points along the dam, and raise the auxiliary spillway. The sponsor requested 75 percent cost-share as a dam safety project – the cost-share percentage provided by the Commission for the final design and permitting.

The total spillway construction cost is $990,000, which is eligible for cost-share at 40 percent as a recreation project in the amount of $396,000. The sponsor also requested cost-share for a low-level drawdown as a component of the overall rehabilitation. The total project cost for the low-level drawdown is $3,000, which is eligible for cost-share at 40 percent, or $1,200. The total cost-share for both the spillway construction and low-level drawdown is $397,200.

This project is included in the 2019 Water Development Plan and meets requirements of the Commission’s cost-share policy for recreation projects. The recommendation was to approve at 40 percent cost-share as a recreation project, due to the purpose of the dam as recreation, and because it is a low hazard dam.

It was moved by Commissioner Volk and seconded by Commissioner Schneider the Commission 1) approve the request from Golden Valley for cost-share participation of $397,200, at 40 percent of eligible costs for the Odland Dam rehabilitation; and 2) discuss the project at the March 2020 subcommittee meeting to determine if the project may be approved at the original 75 percent cost-share request as a dam safety project rather than at 40 percent as a recreation project. The approval is contingent on available funding for the 2019-2021 biennium. Commissioners Anderson, Hemmer, Johnson, Pedersen, Schneider, Volk, Zimmerman, Goehring, and Governor Burgum voted aye. There were no nay votes. Governor Burgum announced the motion carried.

FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS: PEMBINA COUNTY WATER RESOURCE DISTRICT – DRAIN NO. 81: $284,982 (SWC Project No. 2112) Pembina County Water Resource District (District) requested cost-share for the Pembina County Drain 81 construction project.


Pembina County Drain 81 was petitioned by area farmers to address flooding from overland water. The drain will provide improved drainage with better control to the area and discharge into Drain 67A. A positive assessment vote was received for the project, and drain permit #5294 was approved. Construction is expected in 2020. The results of the economic analysis for the project yielded a benefit to cost ratio of 6.9.

St. Thomas wrote a letter to the State Engineer on December 1, 2019, with concerns about impacts of Drain 81 flowing into Drain 67A, which flows through St. Thomas. The project was deferred by the Commission at the December 2019 Commission meeting to allow the District and St. Thomas to meet and discuss issues.

Commissioner Anderson indicated he had met with representatives from each entity to discuss their overall concerns and costs related to the project. St. Thomas may need approximately $100,000 to repair or replace culverts and diking, and St. Thomas indicated the funding is not readily available. Paul Larson, Councilman, St. Thomas, and other representatives from St. Thomas, presented concerns related to the funds needed and requested the Commission hold approval of the project until funds are available. Don Kemp, Pembina County Water Resource District Board, indicated the Board is willing to work with St. Thomas to identify funding sources. The current proposal offered to St. Thomas by Pembina County is a 60/40 split of the costs to mitigate failing culverts at a crossing in St. Thomas. Pembina County would provide 60 percent and St. Thomas would be responsible for 40 percent. After discussion, it was agreed that Commissioner Anderson would continue to work with the parties for resolution. Also assisting would be Aaron Carranza, Regulatory Division Director, SWC. The project is in the 2019 Water Development Plan and meets requirements of the Commission’s cost-share policy for water conveyance projects. The total eligible project cost is $633,293 for cost-share at 45 percent in the amount of $284,982. The recommendation was to approve the cost-share request at 45 percent in the amount of $284,982.

It was moved by Commissioner Anderson and seconded by Commissioner Goehring the Commission approve the request by the District for state cost-share participation of $284,982 at 45 percent of eligible costs for the Pembina County Drain 81 construction project. The approval is contingent on available funding for the 2019-2021 biennium. Commissioners Anderson, Hemmer, Johnson, Pedersen, Schneider, Volk, Zimmerman, Goehring, and Governor Burgum voted aye. There were no nay votes. Governor Burgum announced the motion carried.


PEMBINA COUNTY WATER RESOURCE DISTRICT: TONGUE RIVER CUTOFF CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS - $85,329 (SWC Project No. 1999) Pembina County Water Resource District (District) requested cost-share for a feasibility study of the Tongue River cutoff channel improvement project. The project was deferred in October 2019 due to not being in the 2019 Water Development Plan.

In the 1960s the NRCS constructed the Tongue River cutoff channel to reduce flood damages. The channel has been beneficial, however there are still flood damages that occur. The feasibility study will develop a plan to maximize benefits and review current conditions. Soil stability will be evaluated to ensure project efficiency is maximized by minimizing future maintenance.

This project meets requirements of the Commission’s cost-share policy for water conveyance projects. The total project cost is $189,620, which is eligible for cost-share at 45 percent in the amount of $85,329. It was the recommendation to approve the cost-share request at 45 percent in the amount of $85,329.

It was moved by Commissioner Goehring and seconded by Commissioner Johnson the Commission approve the request by the District for state cost-share participation of $85,329 at 45 percent of eligible costs for the Tongue River cutoff channel improvements project. The approval is contingent on available funding for the 2019-2021 biennium.


SARGENT COUNTY WATER RESOURCE DISTRICT: DRAIN NO. 12 IMPROVEMENTS - $267,512 (SWC Project No. 2127) Sargent County Water Resource District (Sargent County) requested cost-share for the Sargent County Drain No. 12 improvement project. The project includes sizing culverts, installing permanent rock checks to reduce channel velocities, and improves conveyance through County Road 5 by increasing the culvert size. Drain permit #5284 was approved on July 18, 2019, and the assessment district was formed. The economic analysis yielded a benefit to cost ratio of 1.02.

This project is included in the 2019 Water Development Plan and meets requirements of the Commission’s funding policy for water conveyance projects. The project is eligible for 45 percent cost-share as a rural flood control project. The total eligible cost is $594,472. The recommendation was to provide cost-share of 45 percent in the amount of $267,512.


It was moved by Commissioner Zimmerman and seconded by Commissioner Pedersen the Commission approve the request by Sargent County for state cost-share participation of $267,512, at 45 percent of eligible costs for the Sargent County Drain No. 12 channel improvements project. The approval is cont ingent on avai lable funding for the 2019-2021 biennium. Commissioners Anderson, Hemmer, Johnson, Pedersen, Schneider, Volk, Zimmerman, Goehring, and Governor Burgum voted aye. There were no nay votes. Governor Burgum announced the motion carried.

BOTTINEAU COUNTY WATER RESOURCE DISTRICT: OVERGAARD LATERAL EXTENSIONS - $215,969 (SWC Project No. 2104) Bottineau County Water Resource District (Bottineau County) requested cost-share for the Overgaard lateral extension and North Central lateral expansion project.

A positive assessment vote was received, and drain permit #5272 was approved. The results of the economic analysis yielded a benefit to cost ratio of 1.7.

This project meets the requirements of the Water Commission’s cost-share policy for water conveyance projects. The total project cost is $479,931, which is eligible for cost-share at 45 percent in the amount of $215,969. The recommendation was to approve the request at 45 percent in the amount of $215,969.

It was moved by Commissioner Goehring and seconded by Commissioner Zimmerman the Commission approve the request by Bottineau County for state cost-share participation of $215,969 at 45 percent of eligible costs for the Overgaard lateral extension and North Central lateral extension. This approval is contingent on available funding for the 2019-2021 biennium.


FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS: DEVILS LAKE: DEVILS LAKE LEVEE - $1,600,000 (SWC Project No. 0416-02) Devils Lake requested additional cost-share for the Devils Lake Flood Risk Management levee project. The project is a federal US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) project, with Devils Lake serving as the local sponsor.

The original Devils Lake levee was constructed in 1984. In the mid 1990s Devils Lake entered into a contract with the Corps to raise the levee embankment to a top elevation


of 1,450 feet. Since that time, the levee has gone through a series of raises and funding approvals from the Commission. The last levee raise was initiated in 2009, raising the top of the embankment to an elevation of 1,468 feet.

The total project cost from 1995-2012 was $215,530,920. The Corps paid $159,798,190 during this timeframe, which is approximately 75 percent of the total cost. The local share was $55,732,730, or 25 percent of the total cost. Of the local share, the Commission cost-shared $40,889,815. The final Commission payment from previously executed agreements was made in 2012, and as a result, the project was closed-out. When the project was initiated, the Commission had committed to cost-share at 50 percent of the local share. Beginning in 2009, the Commission covered nearly all of the local share because of financial hardship experienced by the Devils Lake area.

In April 2019, the city of Devils Lake received a revised cost estimate from the Corps in the amount of $13,200,000 – with a local responsibility of $3,200,000. The Corps is responsible for $10,000,000, which is 75 percent of the cost. Devils Lake indicated they do not have funding for the local share and requested the Commission cover the $3,200,000, or 100 percent of the local share.

The levee project was closed out in 2012, with the final payment made at that time. The request should, more appropriately, be considered a new request for cost-share under the flood control category. As stated in the Cost-share Funding Policy under the Flood Protection Program, “For projects with federal participation, the cost-share may be up to 50 percent of eligible non-federal costs.” The recommendation was to cost-share at 50 percent of eligible non-federal costs in the amount of $1,600,000.

After discussion, the following motion was made:

It was moved by Commissioner Zimmerman and seconded by Commissioner Pedersen the Commission defer the funding request until the State and city of Devils Lake meet with North Dakota’s congressional delegation on open-ended funding requests from the US Army Corps of Engineers. Commissioners Anderson, Hemmer, Pedersen, Schneider, Volk, Zimmerman, Goehring, and Governor Burgum voted aye. There were no nay votes. Commissioner Johnson abstained. Governor Burgum announced the motion carried.

VALLEY CITY: PERMANENT FLOOD PROTECTION CONDITIONAL LETTER OF MAP REVISION (CLOMR) ENGINEERING - $277,166 (SWC Project No. 1504-06) Valley City requested cost-share for cost overruns related to preliminary and design engineering for Phase IV of their permanent flood protection (PMP) project. The engineering for this phase included work toward acquisition of a CLOMR from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).


Phases I, II, and III of Valley City’s PMP are either complete, or underway, with plans to proceed with construction on Phase IV during summer 2020. To date, no CLOMR has been issued for any of the previously completed or proposed phases. In late December 2019, FEMA representatives requested a conference call with SWC staff and Valley City officials to convey their concerns about issuing a CLOMR for any PMP project phases. FEMA indicated that without being able to review a hydraulic model with all phases of the project designed to a certain level, and submitted for review, it is unlikely that a CLOMR can be issued. Without a CLOMR, Valley City is left with few options to proceed with construction of Phase IV. In the past, Valley City has been able to proceed with construction on Phases I, II, and III because modeling efforts by Valley City’s engineering team have shown no water surface elevation increases or losses of conveyance as a result of levee construction efforts. They have not been able to definitively replicate this for Phase IV. At the October 2019 Commission meeting, $10,834,504 was approved for construction engineering and construction of Phase IV, at 80 percent cost-share. In addition, $776,050 was approved for design engineering of Phase V, at 85 percent cost- share. The current cost overrun request for engineering on Phase IV of Valley City’s PMP is $276,500, of which $235,025 is potentially eligible for 85 percent cost-share. In addition, $42,141 was de-obligated from Valley City’s completed Phase I project, and remains available for carryover projects. Based on Section 7 of Senate Bill 2020 from the 2019 legislative session, a condition on carryover funds is that they may be used only for project carryover. The Phase IV project meets that requirement. Receiving a CLOMR for Valley City’s PMP project is a critical component to the long-term advancement and effectiveness of the project. To proceed with additional construction without a CLOMR puts the state and local sponsor at risk of making additional investments in a project that has not yet been approved by FEMA through the CLOMR process. It indicates whether the project, if built as proposed, would be recognized by FEMA. Once a project has been completed, the community must request a revision to the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) to reflect the project. "As-built" certification and other data must be submitted to support the revision request. The recommendation was to 1) reprogram $235,025 of the $10,834,504, approved in October 2019 for construction of Phase IV, towards preliminary engineering and design efforts related to CLOMR acquisition; and 2) reallocate $42,141, available in 2017-2019 biennium carryover funds for Valley City’s CLOMR-related engineering. The total cost-share of $277,166 would be at 85 percent.

It was moved by Commissioner Goehring and seconded by Commissioner Johnson the Commission 1) reprogram $235,025 of the $10,834,504, approved in October 2019 for construction of Phase IV, towards preliminary engineering and design efforts related to CLOMR acquisition; and 2) reallocate $42,141, available in 2017-2019 biennium carryover funds for Valley City’s CLOMR-related


engineering. The total cost-share of $277,166 would be at 85 percent. The approval is contingent on available funding. Commissioners Anderson, Hemmer, Johnson, Schneider, Volk, Zimmerman, Goehring, and Governor Burgum voted aye. There were no nay votes. Commissioner Pedersen abstained. Governor Burgum announced the motion carried.

NORTHWEST AREA WATER SUPPLY (NAWS)

(SWC Project No. 237-04) Tim Freije, NAWS Project Manager, provided an opinion of probable construction costs for NAWS Contract 2-4B. The recommendation was to authorize the Chief Engineer to award Contract 2-4B to the low responsive bidder pending review of bids received and concurrence from Garrison Diversion Conservancy District.

It was moved by Commissioner Goehring and seconded by Commissioner Zimmerman the Commission authorize the Chief Engineer/Secretary to award NAWS Contract 2-4B to the low responsive bidder pending review of the bids received and concurrence from Garrison Diversion Conservancy District. Commissioners Andersen, Hemmer, Johnson, Pedersen, Schneider, Volk, Zimmerman, Goehring, and Governor Burgum voted aye. There were no nay votes. Governor Burgum announced the motion carried.

APPROVAL OF WATER PERMITS OVER 5,000 ACRE FEET

Jon Patch, Appropriations Division Director, presented information on conditional water permits exceeding the 5,000 acre-foot threshold for final approval by the Commission. Statute gives final approval authority to the Commission for water permits exceeding 5,000 acre feet. Jon also provided an update related to current water permits authorizing more than 5,000 acre-feet of use annually, and the overall policy the SWC uses to approve water permits. Jon will present information related to the development of recent technology advancements such as the electronic routing system, the PRESENS system, and AEM, at a future Commission meeting. The following conditional water permits were presented for approval:

Permit No. Permitholder

Use Type

Recommended Acre Feet

Priority Date

6729 Oasis Midstream Services

Industrial 8,000 10/14/14


7026 Dallas Lalim Industrial 10,000 10/22/18

7046 Select Energy Services

Industrial 18,000 03/04/19

The recommendation was for the Commission to give final approval to the conditional water permits that exceeded 5,000 acre-feet.

It was moved by Commissioner Goehring and seconded by Commissioner Volk the Commission approve conditional water permit numbers 6729, 7026, and 7046.


SOUTHWEST PIPELINE OWNERSHIP TRANSFER STUDY

Mike Berg, Apex Engineering Group, and Matt Oedekoven, DGR Engineering, presented a summary of work tasks and draft revised scope and fee on the Southwest Pipeline Ownership Transfer Study based on recent Commission discussions. The presentation is attached as APPENDIX B. The Commission discussed whether a new Request for Qualifications (RFQ) and scope be drafted for bid, or continue with Apex’s revised scope and fee for Phase 2. It was determined that a selection based on a qualifications-based contract be followed and the following motion was made:

It was moved by Commissioner Johnson and seconded by Commissioner Zimmerman that SWC staff draft a Request for Qualifications for selecting firms to complete a long-term comprehensive strategic planning model for funding water supply systems in North Dakota. Commissioners Anderson, Hemmer, Johnson, Pedersen, Schneider, Volk, Zimmerman, Goehring, and Governor Burgum voted aye. There were no nay votes. Governor Burgum announced the motion carried.

Governor Burgum requested a conference call in two weeks for Commissioners to discuss and approve the RFQ prior to the April Commission meeting. Commissioners expect major findings of the study to be presented by December 2020 and it is the intent to present findings and financial models during the next legislative session.

STATE ENGINEER POSITION Governor Burgum announced the retirement of Garland Erbele effective March 31, 2020. Governor Burgum thanked Garland for his service and leadership.


Governor Burgum announced a search committee will be formed to complete the initial applicant screening and the findings will be brought to the full Commission for hiring. The search committee will consist of representatives from the ND Agriculture Department and Governor’s Office, and Commissioners Anderson and Johnson.

It was moved by Commissioner Goehring, seconded by Commissioner Schneider, and unanimously carried, that a search committee be created with representatives from the ND Agriculture Department and Governor’s Office, and Commissioners Anderson and Johnson; John Paczkowski, Deputy State Engineer, be named Interim State Engineer effective April 1; and the Search Committee will bring forward to Commission finding and recommendations for hiring of State Engineer.

PROJECT PLANNING PROCESS – WATER DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Pat Fridgen reviewed the 2021-2023 Water Development Planning Process with the Commission. The Planning and Education Division has begun developing the 2021 Water Development Plan, focusing on the 2021-2023 biennium and beyond. To initiate the process, staff sent notice to potential project sponsors across the state; directing them to an online submission form, and asked for assistance in identifying water development projects to move forward. The input gained from local project sponsors and water managers will become the foundation of the SWC’s budget request to the Governor and Legislature. The SWC is also required to schedule commissioner-hosted meetings within North Dakota’s major drainage basins. The meetings are held to promote and encourage local project sponsor participation in the water planning process, and in the agency’s project development efforts. Eight meetings will be held - one in each of the commissioners’ respective basins. The deadline for project submittals is April 30. After projects have been submitted, they will be reviewed and prioritized by Commissioners, and a draft inventory will be developed for Commissioner-hosted meetings.

MEETING EFFICIENCY OPTIONS

As discussed at the December 2019 Commission meeting, State Engineer Erbele presented options for making future meetings more efficient. Options discussed were to offer time-saving opportunities without sacrificing the availability of important information critical to the decision-making process. Governor Burgum asked that discussions continue.

ROUNDTABLE UPDATES WITH COMMISSIONERS Commissioners provided brief updates on relevant issues related to their basins.

P R O J E C T F U N D S

300,000,000

250,000,000-

200,000,000-

1 5 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 -

100,000,000-

5 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 -

0

16,875,760

67,570,97549,636 ,500

4 3 M

7339,780 27,289,92526,805,139

Water Supply Rural Water Supply

m

30,722,256

247 ,382 ,652

■ C o m m i t t e d

■ Legislative Intent■ Expended■ U n c o m m i t t e d

■ Appropriated

166,500,000

32,828,618

F l o o d C o n t r o l

23,866,2444/119,893

13,933,026

G e n e r a l W a t e r

EXP

APPENDIX A

1

S T A T E W A T E R C O M M I S S I O NP R O J E C T S U M M A R Y2 0 1 9 - 2 0 2 1 B I E N N I U M

Dec-19

S W C / S E R E M A I N I N GA P P R O V E D E X P E N D I T U R E S U N P A I D

M U N I C I P A L & R E G I O N A L W A T E R S U P P L Y :M U N I C I P A L W A T E R S U P P L Y 6 5 . 7 4 2 . 1 2 8R E D R I V E R V A L L E Y 4 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0O T H E R R E G I O N A L W A T E R S U P P L Y 1 4 , 7 0 4 , 6 0 7

T O T A L 8 4 , 4 4 6 , 7 3 6

R U R A L W A T E R S U P P L Y :R U R A L W A T E R S U P P L Y 3 4 , 1 4 4 , 9 1 9

8 ,716 ,5822 ,000 ,0006 ,159 ,178

57 ,025 ,5462,000,0008,545,430

16,875,760

7,339,780

F L O O D C O N T R O L :F A R G OM O U S E R I V E RV A L L E Y C I T YL I S B O N

O T H E R F L O O D C O N T R O LP R O P E R T Y A C Q U I S I T I O N S

W A T E R C O N V E Y A N C E

G E N E R A L W A T E R :G E N E R A L W A T E R

T O T A L

105,735,612110 ,369 ,758

16,469,2411 ,411 ,117

16,335,69815,995,11711,788,365

3 ,704 ,66916 ,711 ,129

1,084,9728 4 7 , 7 2 4

5,784,634815,247

1,773,881

102,030,94493,658,62915,384 ,269

563 ,39210,551,06415,179,87010,014,484

C A P I T A L A S S E T S :S W P P C A P I T A L A S S E T SN A W S C A P I T A L A S S E T S

T O T A L

18,112,35922 ,248 ,85740 ,361 ,216

2,487,898813 ,436

3,301,334

15,624,46121,435,42137,059,882

R E V O L V I N G L O A N F U N D :

G E N E R A L W A T E R P R O J E C T SW A T E R S U P P L Y

3 ,676 ,6000

3,676,6000

T O T A L S 459 ,087 ,298 62 ,659 ,023 396,428,275

2

S T A T E W A T E R C O M M I S S I O N

P R O J E C T S U M M A R Y

2 0 1 9 - 2 0 2 1 B I E N N I U M

D e c - 1 9

2017-2019C A R R Y O V E R

2 0 1 9 - 2 0 2 1

F U N D I N G

2 0 1 9 - 2 0 2 1

B U D G E T

S W C / S E

A P P R O V E D

R E M A I N I N G

U N O B L I G A T E D

MUNICIPAL & REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY:M U N I C I P A L W A T E R S U P P L Y

R E D R I V E R V A L L E Y

OTHER REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY

35 ,854 ,6284 ,000 ,0009,228,607

29 ,887 ,50043 ,000 ,000

5 ,476 ,000

65 ,742 ,12847 ,000 ,00014,704,607

65 ,742 ,1284 ,000 ,000

14 ,704 ,607

(0 )E 4 a . 0 0 C L 0 0 0 1

{0)

U N O B L I G AT E D M U N I C I PA L / R E G WAT E R S U P P LY 1,731,926 47 ,904 ,574 49 ,636 ,500 ^■^ 4 ^ H 5 0 0 1T o t a l 49 ,083 ,236 128,000,000 1 177,083 ,235 92 ,636 ,499

% O B L I G AT E D 2 6 . 6 4 %

R U R A L W A T E R S U P P L Y :

R U R A L WAT E R S U P P LY 24 ,234 ,844 9 ,910 ,075 34 .144 .919 34 ,144 ,919 (0)

UNOBLIGATED RURAL WATER SUPPLY 0 27 ,289 ,925 27 ,289 ,925 27^^25 1T o t a l 24 ,234 ,844 37,200,000 1 61,434 .844 2 7 , 2 8 9 , 9 2 5

% O B L I G AT E DFLOOD CONTROL:

F A R G O

M O U S E R I V E R

V A L L E Y C I T Y

L ISBONOTHER FLOOD CONTROLPROPERTY ACQUIS IT IONSW A T E R C O N V E Y A N C E

105 ,735 ,61242 ,969 ,758

4 ,858 ,6871 , 4 11 , 11 7

15,379,498820 ,117

9 ,258 ,738

2 6 . 6 4 %

66,500 ,00067 ,400 ,00011,610,554

0

956,20015 ,175 ,000

2 ,529 ,627

172 ,235 ,612110 ,369 ,758

16,469,2411 ,411 ,117

16,335,69815,995,11711,788,365

105,735,612110,369,758

16,469,2411 ,411 ,117

16 ,335 ,69815 ,995 ,11711 ,788 ,365

^B~66^0Q.00030

0

O

o

(0)0

UNOBL IGATED FLOOD CONTROL 0 32,828,618 32 ,828 ,618

T o t a l 180 ,433 ,527 197,000,000 1 377,433 ,526 99 ,328 ,618

% OBLIGATED 4 9 . 5 8 %

G E N E R A L W A T E R :

G E N E R A L W A T E R 15,068,840 3 ,284 ,079 18,352,920 18 ,352 ,920 0

U N O B L I G AT E D G E N E R A L WAT E R 5 6 , 5 4 7 23 ,809 ,697 23 ,866 ,244 ^ B ~ 2 3 , 8 6 6 ^ HT o t a l 15 ,125,386.68 27,093,776 1 42,219 ,164 23 ,866 ,244

% OBLIGATED 11 .91%

C A P I T A L A S S E T S :

S W P P C A P I T A L A S S E T S

N A W S C A P I T A L A S S E T S15,792,35922,248,857

2 ,320 ,0000

18,112,35922 ,248 ,857

18 ,112 ,35922 ,248 ,857

(0)0

U N O B L I G A T E D S W P P C A P I T A L A S S E T S 0 0 0 0

T o t a l 38,041,216 2 ,320 ,000 40 ,361 ,216 0

% OBLIGATED 1 0 0 . 0 0 %

REVOLVING LOAN FUND:G E N E R A L WAT E R P R O J E C T S 0 4,054,221 4,054,221 3,676,600 377,621

UNOBLIGATED REVOLVING LOAN FUND 0 0 0 0

T o t a l 0 4,054,221 4,054,221 377,621

% OBLIGATED 90.69%

T O TA L S 306 ,918 ,209 391 ,613 ,776 702 .586 ,206 4 5 9 . 0 8 7 , 2 9 8 243 ,121 .286

3

S TAT E W AT E R C O M M I S S I O NP R O J E C T S U M M A R Y2 0 1 9 - 2 0 2 1 B i e n n l u m

W AT E R S U P P LY

Approved SWCB y N o

ApprovedD a t e

T o t a l

A p p r o v e dT o t a l

P a y m e n t s

2 0 5 0 - 1 3 5 0 0 0 M a n d a n New Raw Water In take 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 11 . 8 9 8 . 2 0 5 0 11 . 8 9 8 . 2 0 52 0 5 0 - 1 5 5 0 0 0 W a s h b u r n N e w R a w W a t e r I n t a k e [ 2 4/12/181 1 . 8 8 9 . 7 11 1 6 . 7 6 2 1 . 8 7 2 . 9 4 92 0 5 0 - 2 0 5 0 0 0 D ick inson Capital Infrastructure 1 0 / 6 / 1 5 1 . 7 3 1 . 9 2 6 0 1 . 7 3 1 . 9 2 62 0 5 0 - 2 6 5 0 0 0 Fargo Fargo Water System Regionalization Improvements 1 2 / 6 / 1 9 1 . 9 7 1 . 2 8 6 0 1 . 9 7 1 . 2 8 62 0 5 0 - 2 9 5 0 0 0 M ino t Wa te r Sys tems Improvemen t P ro jec t _ 1 2 / 6 / 1 9 5 9 9 . 3 0 1 2 8 . 1 5 7 5 7 1 . 1 4 42 0 5 0 - 3 0 5 0 0 0 Watford City Wa te r Sys tems Improvemen t P ro jec t _ 1 2 / 7 / 1 7 2 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 8 6 2 . 0 8 8 1 . 5 3 7 . 9 1 22 0 5 0 - 3 2 5 0 0 0 Wi l l i s t on Water Systems Improvement Project 1 2 / 6 / 1 9 7 . 8 5 7 . 0 1 0 0 7 . 8 5 7 . 0 1 02 0 5 0 - 3 7 5 0 0 0 D i c k i n s o n D ick inson S ta te Avenue Sou th Wate r Ma in 1 2 / 6 / 1 9 9 6 3 . 9 2 0 0 9 6 3 , 9 2 02 0 5 0 - 4 9 5 0 0 0 Grand Fo rks Grand Forks Water Trea tment P lan t 8 / 2 3 / 1 7 7 . 0 8 9 . 3 7 1 5 . 2 8 9 . 2 6 6 1 , 8 0 0 , 1 0 52 0 5 0 - 5 2 5 0 0 0 N e w To v m Water Transmission Storage 1 0 / 11 / 1 8 7 4 3 . 4 7 7 2 3 3 . 9 8 5 5 0 9 . 4 9 22 0 5 0 - 5 3 5 0 0 0 West Fargo Brooks Ha rbo r Wa te r Tower 8 / 2 3 / 1 7 7 9 7 . 3 3 5 0 7 9 7 . 3 3 52 0 5 0 - 5 4 5 0 0 0 West Fargo North Loop Connectton 8 / 2 3 / 1 7 5 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 . 0 0 02 0 5 0 - 5 5 5 0 0 0 West Fargo West Loop Connection 8 / 2 3 / 1 7 1 . 11 0 . 0 0 0 0 1 . 11 0 . 0 0 02 0 5 0 - 6 6 5 0 0 0 L inco ln Lincoln Water System Improvement Project 2 / 8 / 1 8 1 . 4 1 5 . 7 8 8 1 . 0 1 7 . 4 3 7 3 9 8 . 3 5 12 0 5 0 - 6 7 5 0 0 0 W i l E s t o n Williston Water System Improvements 2 / 8 / 1 8 2 . 3 3 6 . 0 0 0 1 . 2 6 8 . 8 8 9 1 . 0 6 7 . 1112 0 5 0 - 6 8 5 0 0 0 Valley Qty Valley City Membrane Replacement Project 2 / 8 / 1 8 6 7 . 8 2 0 0 6 7 . 8 2 02 0 5 0 - 6 9 5 0 0 0 M a n d a n Sunset Resenro i r Water Transmiss ion L ine 4 / 1 2 / 1 8 2 . 0 4 3 . 4 7 9 0 2 . 0 4 3 . 4 7 92 0 5 0 - 7 5 - 1 9 5 0 0 0 B i s m a r c k Lockport Water Pump Station 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 2 . 2 8 0 . 0 0 0 0 2 . 2 8 0 . 0 0 02 0 5 0 - 7 6 - 1 9 5 0 0 0 Mapleton Water Storage Tank 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 8 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 8 4 0 . 0 0 02 0 5 0 - 8 4 - 1 9 5 0 0 0 C a v a l i e r Water Tower Replacement 1 0 / 1 0 / 1 9 1 . 0 2 2 . 5 0 0 0 1 , 0 2 2 . 5 0 02 0 5 0 - 8 5 - 1 9 5 0 0 0 Mapleton 300.000 Gallon Storage Tank 1 0 / 1 0 / 1 9 5 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 5 4 0 . 0 0 02 0 5 0 - 8 6 - 1 9 5 0 0 0 M i n o t S W Wa t e r To w e r 1 0 / 1 0 / 1 9 2 . 8 5 5 . 0 0 0 0 2 . 8 5 5 , 0 0 02 0 5 0 - 8 7 . 1 9 5 0 0 0 S t r e e t e r Wel l Ins ta l la t ion and Tower Rehabi l i ta t ion 1 0 / 1 0 / 1 9 2 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 2 6 5 , 0 0 0

2 0 5 0 - 8 8 - 1 9 5 0 0 0 Davenport Water Improvement District No. 2019-1 1 0 / 1 0 / 1 9 4 6 6 . 0 0 0 0 4 6 6 , 0 0 02 0 5 0 - 8 9 - 1 9 5 0 0 0 West Fargo 9th Street NW Water Main 1 0 / 1 0 / 1 9 5 9 4 . 0 0 0 0 5 9 4 , 0 0 02 0 5 0 - 9 0 - 1 9 5 0 0 0 Grand Fo rks Wa t e r Tr e a t m e n t P l a n t 1 0 / 1 0 / 1 9 9 . 8 7 5 . 0 0 0 0 9 . 8 7 5 . 0 0 02 0 5 0 - 9 4 - 1 9 5 0 0 0 Watford City Water D is t r ibu t ion 2019 1 2 / 6 / 1 9 1 . 5 8 0 . 0 0 0 0 1 . 5 8 0 . 0 0 0

T O TA L M U N i a PA L W AT E R S U P P LY 6 5 , 7 4 2 , 1 2 8 8 , 7 1 6 , 5 8 2 5 7 , 0 2 5 , 5 4 6

Regional Water Supply:1 9 7 3 - 0 5 5 0 0 0 W A W S A W A W S A P h a s e I V 1 0 / 6 / 1 5 3 . 0 0 1 . 9 6 7 0 3 . 0 0 1 . 9 6 71 9 7 3 - 0 6 5 0 0 0 W A W S A W A W S A P h a s e V 1 2 / 8 / 1 7 6 . 2 2 6 , 6 4 0 6 , 0 0 1 . 6 8 7 2 2 4 . 9 5 3

1 9 7 3 - 0 7 5 0 0 0 W A W S A WAW S A P h a s e V I 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 5 . 4 7 6 . 0 0 0 1 5 7 . 4 9 1 5 . 3 1 8 . 5 0 9

3 2 5 - 1 0 5 5 0 0 0 R R V W S P RRVWSP Gar r i son D ive rs ion 8 / 2 3 / 1 7 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0

T O TA L R E G I O N A L W AT E R S U P P LY 1 8 , 7 0 4 , 6 0 7 8 , 1 5 9 , 1 7 8 1 0 , 5 4 5 , 4 3 0

Rural Water Supply:2 0 5 0 - 3 4 5 0 0 0 North Prair ie RWD S t o r a g e a n d W a t e r M a i n Q 1 2 / 6 / 1 9 1 1 . 0 1 2 . 8 5 4 4 9 4 . 7 9 9 5 1 8 . 0 5 4

2 0 5 0 - 3 5 5 0 0 0 Southeast Water Users D is t System Wide Expansion Feasibility Study 8 / 2 3 / 1 7 3 . 2 4 8 . 3 7 7 1 . 9 9 5 . 7 3 4 1 . 2 5 2 . 6 4 32 0 5 0 - 4 3 5 0 0 0 Al l Seasons Water Dist r ic t System 4 Connection to System 1 [~ 1 2 / 6 / 1 9 4 . 9 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 4 . 9 0 0 . 0 0 02 3 7 3 - 3 9 5 0 0 0 North Central Rural Water Consortium Carpio Berthold Phase 2 1 2 / 6 / 1 9 9 2 6 . 8 8 2 2 8 8 . 6 8 6 6 3 8 . 1 9 6

2 3 7 3 - 4 1 5 0 0 0 North Centra l Rural Water Consort ium Gianville-Deering Area 1 0 / 2 4 / 1 6 4 5 9 . 1 3 7 7 5 . 1 3 3 384.0032 0 5 0 - 5 7 5 0 0 0 North Central Regional Water District Mountrail Expansion Phase II 8 / 2 3 / 1 7 3 . 0 3 4 . 2 8 8 0 3 . 0 3 4 . 2 8 82 0 5 0 - 5 8 5 0 0 0 North Central Regional Water District Mountrail Co. Watery Phase III 8 / 2 3 / 1 7 3 . 4 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 3 . 4 3 0 . 0 0 0

2 0 5 0 - 5 9 5 0 0 0 Cass Rural Water Distr ict Horace Storage Tank 1 0 / 11 / 1 8 1 . 3 3 6 . 6 3 7 1 . 0 1 0 . 8 6 7 3 2 5 . 7 7 02 0 5 0 - 6 0 5 0 0 0 North Prairie Rural District Reservoir 9 Water Supply 6 / 1 2 / 1 8 3 9 8 . 9 9 7 0 3 9 8 . 9 9 72 0 5 0 - 6 1 5 0 0 0 North Prairie Rural District Surrey/Silver Spring 6 / 1 2 / 1 8 3 8 . 2 8 9 0 3 8 . 2 8 9

2 0 5 0 - 6 3 5 0 0 0 Wa l s h RW D System Expansion Project 4 / 1 2 / 1 8 6 6 7 . 6 2 9 5 9 . 6 6 3 6 0 7 . 9 6 7

2 0 5 0 - 6 4 5 0 0 0 McLean-Sher idan Wate r D is t r i c t Tu r t l e Lake Wate r Tower 8 / 9 / 1 8 8 4 6 . 0 6 5 2 5 7 . 8 4 5 5 8 8 . 2 2 0

2 0 5 0 - 6 5 5 0 0 0 Tri-County Rural Water District System Expansion Project 8 / 9 / 1 8 1 . 3 1 6 . 0 0 4 9 4 9 . 8 2 6 3 6 6 . 1 7 72 0 5 0 - 7 1 5 0 0 0 East Cent ra l RWD Grand Forks/Traill Project 1 2 / 7 / 1 8 2 . 0 0 4 . 0 2 8 9 8 7 . 4 5 5 1 . 0 1 6 . 5 7 4

2 0 5 0 - 7 2 5 0 0 0 S t u t s m a n R W D Phase 6 Pettibone Project 4 / 1 2 / 1 8 5 2 2 . 2 3 6 3 7 1 . 0 8 7 1 5 1 . 1 4 9

2 0 5 0 - 7 3 5 0 0 0 Northeast Regional WD Mas te r P lan 1 0 / 11 / 1 8 5 5 . 9 2 2 0 5 5 . 9 2 22 0 5 0 - 7 4 5 0 0 0 Wa l s h RW D Drayton Long-Term Water Supply Feasibility Study 5 / 8 / 1 9 3 7 . 5 0 0 1 8 . 7 5 0 1 8 . 7 5 0

2 0 5 0 - 7 7 - 1 9 5 0 0 0 Dakota Rural Water Distr ic t 2019 Expansion 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 4 6 1 . 2 5 0 1 3 1 . 8 7 5 3 2 9 . 3 7 5

2 0 5 0 - 7 8 - 1 9 5 0 0 0 McLean-Sher idan Rura l Water D is t r i c t 2019 Expansion 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 3 2 7 . 0 7 5 0 3 2 7 . 0 7 5

2 0 5 0 - 7 9 - 1 9 5 0 0 0 Northeast Regional WD Devlis Lake Water Supply Phase II 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 1 . 3 2 8 . 0 0 0 5 2 1 . 5 0 6 8 0 6 . 4 9 4

2 0 5 0 - 8 0 - 1 9 5 0 0 0 S t u t s m a n R W D P h a s e 7 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 1 . 8 1 2 . 0 0 0 0 1 . 8 1 2 . 0 0 0

2 0 5 0 - 8 1 - 1 9 5 0 0 0 South Cen t ra l RWD North Burleigh Water Treatment Plant 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 9 2 0 . 0 0 0 1 0 1 . 5 6 4 8 1 8 . 4 3 6

2 0 5 0 - 8 2 - 1 9 5 0 0 0 Missouri West Water System North Mandan/Highway 25 and Harmon Lake Area 8 / 8 / 1 9 1 . 0 9 5 . 0 0 0 0 1 . 0 9 5 . 0 0 0

2 0 5 0 - 8 3 - 1 9 5 0 0 0 Tri-County Rural Water District P h a s e 5 8 / 8 / 1 9 1 . 9 9 0 . 0 0 0 0 1 . 9 9 0 . 0 0 0

2 0 5 0 - 9 1 - 1 9 5 0 0 0 Agassiz Water Users District 2019 Expansion 1 0 / 1 0 / 1 9 2 7 3 . 7 5 0 0 2 7 3 . 7 5 0

2 0 5 0 - 9 2 - 1 91 5000 East Centra l RWD 2019 Expansion Phase IV 1 0 / 1 0 / 1 9 3 7 5 . 0 0 0 7 4 . 9 8 9 3 0 0 . 0 11

2 0 5 0 - 9 3 - 1 9 5 0 0 0 Greater Ramsey Water District 2019 Expansion 1 0 / 1 0 / 1 9 1 . 3 2 8 , 0 0 0 0 1 . 3 2 8 . 0 0 0

T O TA L R U R A L W AT E R S U P P LY 3 4 , 1 4 4 , 9 1 9 7 , 3 3 9 , 7 8 0 2 6 , 8 0 5 , f 3 9

11 8 , 5 9 1 , 6 5 5 2 4 , 2 1 5 , 5 4 0 94,376,115

Capital Assets:1 7 3 6 - 0 5 8 0 0 0 S W P P2 3 7 4 9 0 0 0 N A W S

Southwest Pipeline ProjectNorthwest Area Water Supply

1 8 . 11 2 . 3 5 92 2 . 2 4 8 . 8 5 7

2 . 4 8 7 . 8 9 88 1 3 . 4 3 6

1 5 . 6 2 4 . 4 6 12 1 . 4 3 5 . 4 2 1

T O TA L C A P I TA L A S S E T S

SWC Board Approved to Continue

4

S T A T E W A T E R C O M M S S I O NP R O J E C T S U M M A R Y2 0 1 9 - 2 0 2 1 B l a n n l u m

F L O O D C O N T R O L

Approved SWCB y N o D e p t S p o n s o r P r o i e c t

ApprovedD a t e

T o t a lA o o r o v e d

T o t a lP a y m e n t s

D e c - 1 9

B a l a n c e

F l o o d C o n t r o l :S E 2 7 4 5 0 0 0 C i t y o f N e c h o Neche Levee Certification Project 9 / 1 6 / 1 9 36.800 0 3 8 , 8 0 0S B 2 0 2 0 1 9 2 8 - 0 5 5 0 0 0 Fargo Metro Ftood Diversion Fargo Metro Flood Dnreision Authority 2015-2017 2 / 1 4 / 1 9 105,735,812 3,704,669 102,030,944

0 1 7 7 1 - 0 1 5 0 0 0 G r a f t o n Grafton Rood Control Project 1 0 / 1 2 / 1 8 12.284,127 5,784,634 8,499,4930 1 9 7 4 R u r a l S o u r i s R i v e r J o i n t W R D Mouse River Rural Projects 8 / 1 9 / 1 9 40,351,930 3 ,610 ,111 38,741,8180 1 9 7 4 M - 1 5 S o u r i s R i v e r J o i n t W R D Mouse River Municipal Projects canyover 2015-17 v a r i o u s 4 ,928,633 4,017,754 910 ,8790 1 9 7 4 M - 1 7 S o u r i s R i v e r J o i n t W R D Mouse River Municipal Projects canyover 2017-19 v a r i o u s 29,402,348 8,988,817 20,413,7290 1 9 7 4 M - 1 9 S o u r i s R i v e r J o i n t W R D Mouse River Municipal New Projects 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 34,650,000 40,382 34,809,838

S W C 2 1 0 7 - 0 2 5 0 0 0 City of Minot SWIF 2018 OutfaD Pipe Project 1 0 / 1 1 / 1 8 880,421 0 880,421S E 2 1 2 2 5 0 0 0 Development of Compretiensive Plan for Souris Basin 9 / 5 / 1 7 156,428 54,288 102 ,142

0 1 3 4 4 - 0 4 5 0 0 0 VaBeyCi ty SIteyenne Rh/er VaDey Flood Control Project PHII 8 / 2 9 / 1 8 4 ,531 9 2 4 ,4400 1 5 0 4 - 0 1 5 0 0 0 VaBeyCi ty Permanent Rood Protection Project Phase 1 5 / 1 / 1 5 49,558 7 ,415 42,1410 1 5 0 4 - 0 3 5 0 0 0 Valley City P e r m a n e n t R o o d P r o t e c t i o n P H I I 1 2 / 9 / 1 8 2,384,405 1,032,569 1,351,8380 1 5 0 4 - 0 6 5 0 0 0 Val ley a ty Permanent Rood Protection PH III & PH IV 1 2 / 8 / 1 7 153.732 44,896 108,8380 1 5 0 4 - 0 7 5 0 0 0 Valley aty Permanent Rood Protection PH ill Constniction 1 0 / 1 1 / 1 8 1,788,179 0 1,788,1790 1 5 0 4 - 0 8 5 0 0 0 Valley aty Permanent Rood Protection Erosion Sites 4 / 9 / 1 9 480,283 0 480 ,2830 1 5 0 4 - 0 9 5 0 0 0 Valley aty Permanent Ftood Protection PH iV and V 1 0 / 1 0 / 1 9 11,810,554 0 11,810,554

S B 2 3 7 1 1 3 4 4 - 0 2 5 0 0 0 L i s b o n Sheyenne River Valley Ftood Control Project 8 / 8 / 1 8 103,971 0 103,9710 1 9 9 1 - 1 0 5 0 0 0 L i s b o n Permanent Rood Protection - Levee F Project 4 / 1 2 / 1 8 457,173 1,294 455 ,8800 1 9 9 1 - 1 3 5 0 0 0 L i s b o n Permanent Rood Protection - Levee C & E Extension 2 / 1 4 / 1 9 849,972 848,431 3,5410 2 0 7 9 - 0 1 5 0 0 0 w a s s t o n W e s t W i l l i s t o n F t o o d C o n t r o l 1 2 / 9 / 1 8 2,472,255 0 2,472,2550 2 1 3 1 5 0 0 0 L o w e r H e a r t R i v e r W R D Ftood Risk Reduction Project 8 / 1 4 / 1 8 225,918 0 225 ,918

S W C 2 1 1 8 5 0 0 0 Cass County Joint WRD S h e l d o n S u b d i v i s i o n L e v e e 1 0 / 1 1 / 1 8 370,200 0 370 ,200S E 2 1 2 4 5 0 0 0 C i tyo fBe ine ld Heart River & Tributaries Flood Control Study 1 1 / 6 / 1 8 27,000 0 27,000S W C 2 1 2 8 5 0 0 0 aty of Minot Minot 2019 Bank Stabilization SWIF Action E 8 / 8 / 1 9 823,180 0 823 ,180S W C 2 1 3 8 5 0 0 0 Pembina County WRD D r a i n N o . 8 2 1 2 / 8 / 1 9 1,011,688 0 0

S u b t o t a l R o o d C o n t r o l 250,321,425 28,133,128 222,188 ,298

Roodway Proper ty Acqu is i t ions :0 1 9 9 3 - 0 5 5 0 0 0 U S n o t Minot Phase - Floodway Acquisitions 4 / 1 2 / 1 8 123 ,277 123 ,278 0

0 1 9 7 4 - M A 1 9 5 0 0 0 Minot Aoqusitions Minot Phase - Floodway Acquisitions 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 11,950,000 225 ,588 11,724,4340 1 9 7 4 - R A 1 9 5 0 0 0 Rural Floodway Acquistions Minot Rural - Floodway Acquisitions 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 3 ,225,000 328 ,598 2,898,404S B 2 3 7 1 1 5 0 4 - 0 5 5 0 0 0 Valley aty Valley City - Roodway Acquisitions 1 2 / 8 / 1 7 675 ,173 137 ,809 537,3840 1 9 9 1 - 0 5 5 0 0 0 L i s b o n Lisbon - Floodway Acquisition 5 / 8 / 1 9 2 1 , 6 6 8 0 2 1 , 8 8 8

Subtotal Floodway Property Acquisi t ions 15,995,117 815 ,247 15,179,870

T O T A L F L O O D C O N T R O L 288,318,543 28 ,948 ,375 237,388 ,188

Revolving Loan Fund:

S W C 1 5 0 4 - 0 9\ V 7 0 i i o i a i v v a i o i ;

1050 Val ley aty Valley City - Pennanent Flood Protection Loan 1 2 / 8 / 1 9 3 ,878,800 0 3,878,800

(Water Supply)

R E V O L V I N G L O A N T O T A L 3,676,600 0 3 , 6 7 6 , 6 0 0

T O T A L 2 8 9 , 9 9 3 , 1 4 3 2 8 , 9 4 8 , 3 7 5 2 4 1 , 0 4 4 , 7 8 8

SWC Board Approved to Continue

5

S TAT E W AT E R C O M M S S I O NP R O J E C T S U M M A RY2 0 1 9 - 2 0 2 1 B i e n n i u m

R e s o u r c e s T r u s t F u n d

W AT E R C O N V E YA N C E

Approved SWCB v N o D e p t

A p p r o v e dB i e n n i u m S p o n s o r P r o j e c t

A p p r o v e dD a t e

To t a lA p p r o v e d

T o t a l

P a y m e n t s

D e c - 1 9

B a l a n c e

D r a i n & C h a n n e l I m p r o v e m e n t P r o j e c t s :S B 1 0 5 6 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 Bot t ineau Co. WRD Stead Legal Drain 2 / 1 6 / 1 7 3 . 0 6 8 0 3 , 0 6 8S B 1 0 5 9 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 B o t t i n e a u C o W R D Baumann Legal Dra in 3 / 7 / 1 8 4 1 , 4 2 7 0 4 1 , 4 2 7S W C 1 0 5 9 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 Bot t ineau Co WRD Baumann Legal Dra in 1 2 / 7 / 1 8 3 7 8 . 9 7 6 0 3 7 8 , 9 7 6S W C 1 0 7 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 Maple River WRD Drain #14 Channel Improvements 3 / 2 9 / 1 7 3 2 7 , 9 9 0 0 3 2 7 , 9 9 0S W C 1 0 7 1 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 Maple River WRD Cass County Drain #15 Channel Improvements 3 / 9 / 1 6 8 9 , 5 3 3 0 8 9 , 5 3 3S W C 1 0 9 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 Sout t ieast Cass WRD Cass County Drain No. 40 Improvement Project 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 1 9 2 , 6 0 0 0 1 9 2 , 6 0 0S W C 1 1 8 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 Richland Co WRD Legal Drain #7 Channel Improvements 1 2 / 7 / 1 8 2 0 0 , 8 1 2 1 7 5 , 5 0 6 2 5 , 3 0 6S W C 1 2 1 7 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 Tri-County WRD Drain No 6 1 0 / 1 0 / 1 9 7 3 8 , 9 0 0 0 7 3 8 , 9 0 0S W C 1 2 2 2 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 Sargent Co WRD Drain No 11 Channel Improvements 1 0 / 1 2 / 1 6 1 , 3 7 4 , 5 9 6 0 1 , 3 7 4 , 5 9 6S W C 1 3 11 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 Traill Co. WRD Buxton Township Improvement District No. 68 3 / 9 / 1 6 2 9 , 1 3 3 0 2 9 , 1 3 3S W C 1 3 1 4 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 Wells Co. WRD Hurdsfield Legal Drain 3 / 2 9 / 1 7 6 4 4 . 2 9 2 6 8 , 0 3 4 5 7 6 , 2 5 8S W C 1 3 3 1 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 Richland Co WRD Drain #14 Reconstruct ion 1 2 / 9 / 1 6 7 2 , 8 8 6 0 7 2 , 8 8 6S W C 1 4 8 6 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 Griggs Co. WRD Thompson Bridge Outlet No. 4 Project [ 12 /6 /191 5 9 0 , 1 4 6 0 5 9 0 , 1 4 6S W C 1 5 2 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 Walsh Co. WRD Wblsh County Drain 30-1 3 / 2 9 / 1 7 9 2 , 1 9 8 0 9 2 , 1 9 8S W C 1 5 2 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 Walsh Co. WRD Wblsh County Drain 30-2 1 0 / 11 / 1 8 301 ,501 2 0 1 , 5 7 4 9 9 , 9 2 6S B 1 6 3 8 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 Rush River WRD Auka Ring Dike 10 /30 /19 2 4 , 3 7 4 0 2 4 , 3 7 4S W C 1 6 5 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 Sargent Co WRD Sargent County Drain No. 7 Cost Ovenun 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 11 4 , 2 2 7 0 11 4 , 2 2 7

S W C 1951 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 Maple River WRD Lynchburg Channel improvements 7 / 6 / 1 6 1 , 11 5 , 3 3 7 0 1 , 11 5 , 3 3 7S W C 1 9 7 8 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 Richland-Sargent Joint WRD RS Legal Drain #1 Extension & Channel Improvemen 3 / 2 9 / 1 7 7 0 , 4 2 2 0 7 0 , 4 2 2S W C 1 9 9 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 11 - 1 3 Mercer Co. WRD Lake Shore Estates High Flow Diversion Project [ 4 / 1 2 / 1 8 ! 4 3 , 8 2 1 0 4 3 , 8 2 1S B 2 0 1 6 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 Pembina Co. WRD Establishment of Pembina County Drain No. 80 4 / 1 0 / 1 7 2 4 , 6 0 9 0 2 4 , 6 0 9S W C 2 0 4 9 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 Grand Forks Co. WRD Grand Forks Legal Drain No. 58 3 / 2 9 / 1 7 7 7 4 , 9 8 6 3 3 8 , 3 6 6 4 3 6 , 6 2 0S W C 2 0 6 8 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 Train Co. WRD Stavanger-Beimont Drain No. 52 Channel Impr 10 /12 /16 1 2 0 , 1 3 9 3 4 , 1 0 4 8 6 , 0 3 5

S W C 2 0 8 7 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 Walsh Co. WRD Drain #87/McLeod Dra in 3 / 2 9 / 1 7 2 , 4 1 9 , 9 6 1 6 8 7 , 7 1 5 1 , 5 3 2 , 2 4 7S W C 2 0 6 8 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 Pembina Co. WRD Drain No. 79 1 2 / 9 / 1 6 8 4 , 4 0 2 5 2 , 7 6 4 3 1 , 6 3 8S B 2 1 0 1 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 Waish Co. WRD Waish Co Drain #90 4 / 1 1 / 1 9 7 0 , 6 0 3 0 7 0 , 6 0 3

S W C 2 1 0 8 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 Waish Co. WRD Walsh Co Drain #22 6 / 2 2 / 1 7 8 1 , 1 7 6 0 8 1 , 1 7 6S B 2 1 1 2 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 P e m b i n a C o . W R D Pembina Co Drain #81 7 / 3 0 / 1 7 5 6 , 0 0 0 0 5 6 , 0 0 0S B 2 1 3 3 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 Burteigh Co. WRD Missouri River Section 32 Bank Stabil ization Projects 4 / 1 1 / 1 9 2 2 , 5 0 0 0 2 2 , 5 0 0S W C 2 1 3 8 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 Pembina County WRD Drain No. 82 1 2 / 6 / 1 9 1 , 0 11 , 6 6 6 0 1 , 0 11 , 6 6 6

S B 1 4 1 3 - 0 1 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 Traill Co. WRD Camrud Drainage Improvement District No. 79 4 / 11 / 1 9 1 4 , 5 5 7 1 2 , 0 9 7 2 , 4 5 9S B 2 0 9 3 / 1 4 2 7 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 Bot t ineau Co. WRD Moen Legal Drain 9/6 /16 1 7 , 4 1 2 0 1 7 , 4 1 2

Snagging & Clearing Projects:2 5 , 6 0 8S E 6 6 2 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 Walsh Co. WRD Park River Snagging & Clearing 2 / 1 7 / 1 7 2 5 , 6 0 8 0

S B 2 0 9 5 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 Nelson Co WRD Sheyenne River Snagging & Clearing 4 / 1 0 / 1 7 1 9 , 7 0 0 0 1 9 , 7 0 0

S B 2 0 9 5 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 Barnes Co WRD 2019 Sheyenne River Snag & Clear Reach 1 - Projec 9 / 1 6 / 1 9 4 9 , 7 5 0 0 4 9 , 7 5 0S B 2 1 1 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 Ward Co. WRD Meadowbrook Snagging & Qearing 6 / 2 1 / 1 7 3 3 , 0 0 0 0 3 3 , 0 0 0

S W C 1 8 6 8 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 Southeast Cass WRD Wild Rice River Snag and Clear 8 / 8 / 1 9 1 2 0 , 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 , 0 0 0S W C 5 6 8 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 Southeast Cass WRD Sheyenne River Snag & Clear 8 / 8 / 1 9 2 9 4 , 0 0 0 0 2 9 4 , 0 0 0

S W C 1 6 9 4 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 Pembina County WFtD Tongue River Snag and Clear 8 / 8 / 1 9 9 8 , 3 3 7 0 9 8 , 3 3 7

T O T A L

SWC Board Approved to Contmue

1 1 . 7 8 4 . 6 4 5 1 . 7 7 0 . 1 6 1 1 0 . 0 1 4 . 4 8 4

6

7

S T A T E W A T E R C O M M I S S t O NP R O J E C T S U M M A R Y2 0 1 9 - 2 0 2 1 B l e n n t u m

R e s o u r c e s T r u s t F u n d

G E N E R A L P R O J E C T S

Approved SWCB y N o O e p t

ApprovedB t e n n i u m S p o n s o r P r o j e c t

ApprovedD a t e

T o t a lA p p r o v e d

T o t a lP a v m e n i s

D e c - 1 9

B a l a n c e

Hydrologlc Invest igat ions:S W C 2 0 4 1 3 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 U S G S Stream Gage Joint Funding Agreement 1 2 / 7 / 1 8 694.531 280 ,425 414 ,106S E 9 8 9 3 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 ND Dept of Environmental Quality Water Sampling Testing 8 / 1 3 / 1 9 11 0 . 0 0 0 55,000 55,000

SubiotBl HyOrologle tevesffgatfous 804,531 335 ,425 4 ^ , 1 0 5

Devi ls Lake Basin DevelopmentS W C 4 1 6 - 1 0 4 7 0 0 Operations Devils Lake Outlet Operations 4 / 9 / 1 9 3 ,760.132 1,467,906 2,292,226

SiM^rOenrils Lake Basin Development 3J60 , i 3 i ^ 1,467,908 %292,226

Genera l Nb te rManagement ;S W C 1 6 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 M c L e a n C o W R O Painted Woods Lake Flood Damage Reduction & Habita 8 / 9 / 1 8 284 .768 0 284 ,768S W C 2 6 9 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 W a l s h C o . W R O F o r d v i U e D a m R e h a b i E a t k m 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 122,595 1 2 7 122,468S E 3 9 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 Logan County WRO Beaver Lake Dam Rehabilitation Feas2)ility Study 6 / 8 / 1 6 2 ,140 0 2 ,140S E 3 9 1 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 Sargent Co WRO Silver Lake Dam Improvements 1 2 / 2 0 / 1 8 28,606 3,142 25,465S W C 3 9 4 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 Golden Valley Co WRO Odland Dam Rehabilitation Project 1 2 / 7 / 1 8 110,055 64,100 45,955S W C 3 9 9 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 B a r n e s C o W R O Kathryn Dam Project 8 / 9 / 1 8 754 ,875 0 754 ,875S E 4 2 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 Hettinger Paik Board Mirror Lake Dam Emergency Action Plan 1 2 « / 1 6 11 ,573 0 11 ,573S E 4 6 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 Griggs Co. WRO Ueland Dam Rehabilitation Feasibility Study 5 / 2 0 / 1 6 17,500 0 17,500S E 4 7 7 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 Valley City MID Dam RehabiEtation Feasib9ty Study 6 / 8 / 1 6 2 ,937 0 2 ,937S E 5 1 2 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 Emmons County WRO Nieuwstrra Dam Emergency Action Plan 1 1 / 2 8 / 1 6 6 ,720 0 6 ,720S E 5 3 1 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 B e n s o n C o W R D B o u r e t D a m R e h a b i fi t i a t i o n 1 2 / 2 0 / 1 8 31,843 0 31,843S W C 5 3 1 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 B e n s o n C o W R D B o u r e t D a m R e h a b i U t i a t i o n 4 / 9 / 1 9 591 ,750 5,034 586,716S W C 5 5 1 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 McHsnry Co. WRD Buffalo Lodge Lake Outlet 6 / 2 2 / 1 7 61,540 0 61,540S E 5 6 1 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 City of Tioga Tioga Dam EAP 5 / 2 0 / 1 6 40,000 0 40,000S W C 6 8 8 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 G r a n d F o r f c e C o W R D L a r i m o r e D a m R e h a b i l i t a t i o n 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 91,800 0 91,800S W C 8 4 8 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 Sargent Co WRD B n i m m o n d / L u b k e D a m 1 0 / 1 1 / 1 8 280 ,043 192,439 87,604S E 8 4 9 - 0 1 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 P e m b i n a C o . W R D Goschke Dam Spillway Gate Retrofit 4 / 9 / 1 9 119,010 73,882 4 5 , 1 2 8S W C 9 8 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 C a s s C o . J o i n t W R D Rush River watershed Detention Study 1 / 7 / 1 6 99,257 0 9 9 , 2 5 7S W C 9 8 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 C a s s C o . J o i n t W R D Upper Maple River Watershed Detention Study 1 / 1 1 / 1 6 70,699 0 7 0 , 6 9 9S E 1 2 6 4 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 - 1 5 B a r n e s C o W R D Little Dam Repurposing Feasibility Study [ 12/6/191 12,385 6,588 5 ,797S E 1 2 8 9 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 M c K e n z i e C o . W e e d B o a r d Control of Noxious Weeds on Sovereign Land 4 / 1 0 / 1 7 27,549 0 2 7 , 5 4 9S W C 1 2 9 6 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 P e m b i n a C o . W R D Tongue River NRCS Watershed Plan 3 / 9 / 1 6 64,334 7,196 5 7 , 1 3 8S W C 1 3 0 1 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 R i c h l a n d C o . W R D North Branch Antelope Creek NRCS SmaD Watershed 3 / 9 / 1 6 53,939 2 3 , 9 3 5 30,004S W C 1 3 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 Sargent Co WRD Shoitfoot Creek Watershed Planning Program 3 / 9 / 1 6 84,475 2 ,736 8 1 , 7 4 0S W C 1 3 8 9 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 - 1 5 B a n k o f N D BND AgPace Program 8 / 8 / 1 9 180,365 20,000 160 ,365S E 1 4 3 1 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 USGS/LaMoure County Rapid Deployment Gages under FEMA Hazard Mit 1 0 / 1 7 / 1 9 5 0 0 0 5 0 0

SE 1 4 4 4 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 City of Pembina Flood Protection System Certification 4 / 1 9 / 1 6 1,657 0 1 ,657S E 1 4 5 3 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 Hettinger County WRD Karey Dam RehabiEtation FeasibDity Study 5 / 2 3 / 1 6 6,853 0 6 ,853S E 1 4 5 3 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 Hettinger County WRD Karey Dam Rehabilitation Design & Planning 1 2 / 1 4 / 1 8 48,284 0 4 8 , 2 8 4S E 1 4 5 3 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 Hettinger Counfy WRD Karey Dam RehabiEtation Project 4 / 9 / 1 9 971 ,325 0 971 ,325H B 1 2 0 2 1 6 2 5 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 Various Consulting Rrms Sovereign Land NavigabEity Determination 8 / 8 / 1 9 400 ,000 0 400 ,000S W C 1 8 5 1 - 0 1 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 N D S t a t e w a t e r C o m m i s s i o n Drought Disaster Livestock Water Supply Assistance 2 / 8 / 1 8 656 ,983 49,117 607 ,865S W C 1 8 7 8 - 0 2 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 Maple-Steele Joint WRD Upper Maple River Dam Outlet Channel Improvements 4 / 9 / 1 9 8 2 , 3 2 0 0 8 2 , 3 2 0S W C 1 9 6 8 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 G a r r i s o n D i v e r s i o n MM 15 Irrigation Project 3 / 2 9 / 1 7 9 3 , 6 1 5 0 9 3 , 6 1 5S W C 1 9 6 8 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 G a n i s o n D i v e r s i o n MM 42L Imgation Project 8 / 2 3 / 1 7 4 8 , 6 6 0 0 4 8 , 6 6 0S W C 1 9 6 8 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 G a r r i s o n D i v e r s i o n MM 0 and MM 0.4 Irrigation Project 1 2 / 7 / 1 8 1 ,673,793 29,089 1,644,704S B 2 0 0 9 1 9 8 6 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 ND Dept of Agriculture W i l d l i f e S e r v i c e s 8 / 1 5 / 1 9 125 ,000 0 125,000S E 2 0 5 5 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 Red River Joint Water Resource Distrist Lower Red Basin Regional Detention Study 1 2 / 6 / 1 9 4 5 , 0 0 0 0 4 5 , 0 0 0S W C 2 0 5 9 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 P a r i t R i v e r J o i n t W R D North Branch Parit River NRCS Watershed Study 1 2 / 6 / 1 9 81,200 0 8 1 , 2 0 0S W C 2 0 6 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 W a i s h C o . W R D Forest River Watershed Study 4 / 1 0 / 1 7 154 ,012 0 154,012S W C 2 0 6 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 W a l s h C o . W R D Matejcek Dam Rehabilitation 1 0 / 1 1 / 1 8 194 ,345 21,620 172,725S E 2 0 7 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 Garrision Diversion Conservancy Dist Mile Marker 42 Irrigation Project 5 / 2 0 / 1 6 29,741 0 29,741S E 2 0 7 1 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 Foster County WRD Alkali Lake hfigh Water Feasibilitly Study 4 / 1 9 / 1 6 4 ,830 0 4 ,830S E 2 0 7 2 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 B a r n e s C o W R D Ten Mile Lake Flood Risk Reduction Project 6 / 8 / 1 6 36,812 0 36,812S W C 2 0 7 5 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 W a r d C o . W R D Second Larson Coulee Detention Pond 7 / 6 / 1 6 602 ,307 0 602 ,307S W C 2 0 8 3 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 P e m b i n a C o . W R O Hetzog Dam Gate & Catwalk Retrofit - Constmction 1 0 / 1 2 / 1 6 106,188 0 106,188S E 2 0 8 5 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 A d a m s C o W R D Orange Dam RehabiEtation Feasibility Study 1 0 / 1 3 / 1 6 8 ,840 0 8 ,840S E 2 0 8 9 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 Maple River WRD Tower Township Improvement District No. 77 Study 1 2 / 1 9 / 1 6 16,458 0 16,458S E 2 0 9 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 I n t e r n a t i o n a l W a t e r I n s t i t u t e River watch Program 1 / 1 2 / 1 7 59,074 5,234 53,840S W C 2 0 9 6 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 S o u t h e a s t C a s s W R D Sheyenne-Maple Flood Control Dist #2 Improvements 3 / 2 9 / 1 7 322 ,617 0 322 ,617S W C 2 1 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 W a l s h C o . W R D Byfin Dam F^habilitation 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 131,370 1 2 7 131,243S E 2 1 0 9 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 Logan County WRD McKenna Lake Feasibility Study 6 / 2 1 / 1 7 2 ,247 0 2 ,247S E 2 1 0 9 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 Logan County WRD McKenna Lake Kydrotogic Study 9 / 1 2 / 1 8 55,961 0 55,961S W C 2 1 1 5 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 Applied Weather Associates, LLC (PMP) Probable Maximum Precipitation Estimates 1 0 / 1 1 / 1 8 600 ,000 176,185 4 2 3 , 8 1 5S W C 2 1 2 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 Apex Engineering SWPP Transfer of Ownership Study 4 / 9 / 1 9 170,909 109,004 6 1 , 9 0 5S W C 2 1 2 1 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 P e m b i n a C o . W R D Senator Young Dam RehabiEtation 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 129,210 0 129,210S W C 2 1 2 3 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 Geotach, Inc. Airbome Electromagnetic (AEM)2018 8 / 9 / 1 8 427 ,354 186,292 241 ,062S E 1 3 9 6 - 0 1 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 - 1 5 Trout. Raley, Montano, Witwer, & Freema Missouri River Recovery Program 1 1 / 1 7 / 1 5 46,510 0 46,510S W C A R B - W M I - 1 9 - 1 7 6 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 Weather Modification. Inc. Atmospheric Resource Operations and Research Gr 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 875 ,722 0 875 ,722S W C P S / I R R / L O W 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 Lower Yellowstone Irrigation District #2 Lateral W Irrigation Project 6 / 1 4 / 1 8 366 ,445 0 366 ,445S E A O O W E F 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 N D w a t e r E d u c a t i o n F o u n d a t i o n ND Water Magazine 7 / 2 3 / 1 9 26,000 6,500 1 9 , 5 0 0S W C A O D R R B 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 R e d R i v e r B a s i n C o m m i s s i o n Red River Basin Commission Contractor 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 200 ,000 50,000 150,000S W C A O C / A S S 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 A s s i n i b o i n e R i v e r B a s i n I n i t i t i a t i v e A R B I ' s O u t r e a c h E f f o r t s 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 100,000 0 100,000S E A O C / I R A 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 ND Irrigation Association Water Irrigation Funding 6 / 2 8 / 1 9 50,000 25,000 25,000S E P S / W R D / D E V 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 D e v i l s L a k e B a s i n J o i n t W R B Board Manager 7 / 1 / 1 9 60,000 0 6 0 , 0 0 0S E P S / W R O f U P P 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 Upper Sheyenne River Joint WRB USRJWB Operational Costs 6 / 2 0 / 1 7 0 0 0S E P S / W R D r t i ^ R J 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 M s s o u r i R i v e r J o i n t W R B MRRIC Terry Fleck 5 / 2 / 1 9 45,000 0 4 5 , 0 0 0S E P S A Y R O / M R J 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 M s s o u r i R i v e r J o i n t W R B Board Operational Costs 6 / 7 / 1 7 0 0 0S E P S / W R D / L O W 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 L o w e r H e a r t W R D Lower Heart Rood Contral Study 5 / 1 0 / 1 7 21,140 0 2 1 , 1 4 0

S iMp ta lGe ine ra i P ro jec t s 12.229.041: 1,05^7,347 11.171,695

T O T A L ^ ^ J 6 j 7 9 3 j 7 0 ^ ^ J 6 0 J 7 8 _ _ _ J 3 J 3 3 j ^

S W C B o a r d A p p r o v e d l o C o n t i n u e I " H

8

STATE WATER COMMISSIONP R O J E C T S U M M A RY2 0 1 9 - 2 0 2 1 B i e n n i u m

R e s o u r c e s Tr u s t F u n d

COMPLETED GENERAL PROJECTSD e c - 1 9

Approvec SWC Approved A p p r o v e d T o t a l T o t a lBy N o D e p t B i e n n i u m S p o n s o r Pro jec t

=D a t e Approved P a y m e n t s Ba lance

Hydrologic Investigations:0 0 0 0 0 0 1 / 0 / 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0

S W C F U G R O 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 F U G R O Aerial Imagery Project 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 7 9 0 , 0 0 0 7 9 0 , 0 0 0 0S W C 2 0 7 4 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 City of Wahpeton Breakou t Easemen ts 7 / 6 / 1 6 2 6 5 , 2 5 0 2 6 5 , 2 5 0 0S W C 2 0 7 4 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 City of Wahpeton F l o o d C o n t r o l - L e v e e C e r t i fi c a t i o n 7 / 6 / 1 6 2 4 7 , 5 0 0 2 4 7 , 5 0 0 0S E 2 0 9 0 - 0 2 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 intematlonai Water Institi River of Dreams Program 6 / 6 / 1 8 8 ,331 8 ,331 0S E 1 2 7 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 CttyofWaton Wilton Pond Dredging Recreatbn Project 1 2 / 2 9 / 1 5 3 5 , 7 0 7 0 3 5 , 7 0 7S E 1 2 7 3 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 City of Cakes James River Bank StabiEzation 11 / 2 6 / 1 9 1 6 , 8 6 9 1 6 , 8 6 9 0S E 1 4 3 1 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 USGS Rapid Deplyment Gage on the James River at Adrian 3 / 2 0 / 1 9 4 , 9 0 0 4 , 9 0 0 0S E 1 3 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 - 1 5 Saigent Co WRD Gwinner Dam Improvement Feasibility Study Program 4 / 1 7 / 1 5 2 0 , 1 8 1 501 19,681S W C 1 8 5 9 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 5 ND Dept of Environments NPS Pollution 8 / 2 3 / 1 7 2 0 0 , 6 2 9 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 6 2 9S E 8 6 7 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 Burtce Co WRD Northgate Dam 2 Emergency Action Plan 9 / 5 / 1 7 2 6 , 3 9 6 2 5 , 8 6 6 5 3 0

Subtotal Qonoral Projects 1,SIS,783 1 . S S 9 , 2 1 8 5 9 , 5 4 7

T O T A L 1 . 6 1 5 , 7 6 3 1 , 5 5 9 , 2 1 6 5 6 , 5 4 7

9

S TAT E WAT E R C O M M I S S I O NP R O J E C T S U M M A R Y

2 0 1 9 - 2 0 2 1 B i e n n l u m

M U N I C I P A U R E G I O N A L W A T E R S U P P L Y D e c e m b e r - 1 9B a l a n c e

B U C K E T TO TA L S . B . 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 0 2 1 $ 128,000,000

A P P R O P R I A T E D T O R E D R I V E R V A L L E Y $ 43,000,000

O B U G AT E D T H I S B I E N N I U M

2 0 5 0 - 1 3 5 0 0 0 M a n d a n M a n d a n R a w W a t e r I n t a k e 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 9 , 5 7 0 , 0 0 02 0 5 0 - 7 5 - 1 9 5 0 0 0 B i s m a r c k Lockport Water Pump Station 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 2 , 2 8 0 , 0 0 02 0 5 0 - 7 6 - 1 9 5000 Mapleton Water Storage Tank 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 8 4 0 , 0 0 01 9 7 3 - 0 7 5 0 0 0 W A W S A W A W S A 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 5 , 4 7 6 , 0 0 02 0 5 0 - 8 4 - 1 9 5 0 0 0 C a v a l i e r Water Tower Replacement 1 0 / 1 0 / 1 9 1,022,5002 0 5 0 - 8 5 - 1 9 5000 Mapleton 300,000 Gallon Storage Tank 1 0 / 1 0 / 1 9 5 4 0 , 0 0 02 0 5 0 - 8 6 - 1 9 5 0 0 0 M I n o t SW Water Tower 1 0 / 1 0 / 1 9 2,855,0002 0 5 0 - 8 7 - 1 9 5 0 0 0 S t r e e t e r Well Instal lat ion and Tower Rehabi l i tat ion 1 0 / 1 0 / 1 9 2 6 5 , 0 0 02 0 5 0 - 8 8 - 1 9 5000 Davenport Water Improvement District No. 2019-1 1 0 / 1 0 / 1 9 4 6 6 , 0 0 02 0 5 0 - 8 9 - 1 9 5000 West Fargo 9th Street NW Water Main 1 0 / 1 0 / 1 9 5 9 4 , 0 0 02 0 5 0 - 9 0 - 1 9 5 0 0 0 G r a n d F o r k s Water Trea tment P lan t 1 0 / 1 0 / 1 9 9 , 8 7 5 , 0 0 02 0 5 0 - 9 4 - 1 9 5000 Watford City Water Dis t r ibut ion 2019 M i m 9 1 , 5 8 0 , 0 0 0

M U N I C I PA U R E G I O N A L WAT E R S U P P LY O B L I G AT E D 35,383,500

B A L A N C E 49,636,500

COMPLETED WATER SUPPLY - FUNDS TURNED BACK

M U N i a PA U R E G I O N A L F U N D S T U R N E D B A C K 0

B A L A N C E P E R P R O J E C T S U M M A RY R E P O RT 49,636,500

V A R I A N C E 0

10

S TAT E W AT E R C O M t M I S S I O NP R O J E C T S U M M A R Y2 0 1 9 - 2 0 2 1 B i e n n i u m

R U R A L W A T E R S U P P L Y D e c e m b e r - 1 9Balance

B U C K E T T O T A L S . B . 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 0 2 1 $ 37,200,000

O B L I G A T E D T H I S B I E N N I U M

2 0 5 0 - 7 7 - 1 9 5 0 0 0 D a k o t a R u r a l Wa t e r D i s t r i c t 2019 Expansion 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 461,2502 0 5 0 - 7 8 - 1 9 5 0 0 0 M c L e a n - S h e r i d a n R u r a l Wa t e r D i s t r i c t 2019 Expansion 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 327,0752 0 5 0 - 7 9 - 1 9 5000 Northeast Regional Water District Devils Lake Water Supply Phase 11 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 1,328,0002 0 5 0 - 8 0 - 1 9 5 0 0 0 S t u t s m a n R u r a l Wa t e r D i s t r i c t P h a s e 7 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 1,812,0002 0 5 0 - 8 1 - 1 9 5000 South Central Regional Water District North Burleigh Water Treatment Plant 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 920,0002 0 5 0 - 8 2 - 1 9 5000 Missouri West Water System North Mandan/Highway 25 and Harmon Lake Area 8 / 8 / 1 9 1,095,0002 0 5 0 - 8 3 - 1 9 5000 Tri-County Rural Vtteter District P h a s e 5 8 / 8 / 1 9 1,990,0002 0 5 0 - 9 1 - 1 9 5000 Agassiz Water Users District 2019 Expansion 1 0 / 1 0 / 1 9 273,7502 0 5 0 - 9 2 - 1 9 5 0 0 0 E a s t C e n t r a l R W D 2019 Expansion Phase IV 1 0 / 1 0 / 1 9 375,0002 0 5 0 - 9 3 - 1 9 5000 Greater Ramsey Water District 2019 Expansion 1 0 / 1 0 / 1 9 1,328,000

R U R A L W A T E R S U P P L Y O B U G A T E D 9,910,075

B A L A N C E 27,289,925

C O M P L E T E D R U R A L W AT E R S U P P LY - F U N D S T U R N E D B A C Kf t

R U R A L W AT E R S U P P LY - F U N D S T U R N E D B A C K

u

0

B A L A N C E P E R P R O J E C T S U M M A R Y R E P O R T 27,289,925

V A R I A N C E 0

11

S TAT E W AT E R C O M M I S S I O NP R O J E C T S U M M A R Y2 0 1 9 - 2 0 2 1 B l e n n i u m

F L O O D C O N T R O L P R O J E C T S B U C K E T D e c e m b e r - I BBalance

B U C K E T T O T A L S . B . 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 0 2 1 $ 1 9 7 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0

A P P R O P R I A T E D T O F A R G O 6 6 . 5 0 0 , 0 0 0

F L O O D C O N T R O L O B U G AT E D T H I S B I E N N I U MS W C 1 5 0 4 - 0 9 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 1 0 / 1 0 / 1 9 Valley Oty P e n n a n e n t F l o o d P r o t e c t i o n P H I V a n d V 11 , 6 1 0 . 5 5 4S W C 1 9 7 4 - M 1 9 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 Sour ls River Jo int WRD MREFPP Minot Projects 3 4 , 6 5 0 , 0 0 0S W C 1 9 7 4 - M A 1 9 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 Sour is River Jo int WRD MREFPP Minot Acquisitions 11 , 9 5 0 , 0 0 0

S W C 1 9 7 4 - R 1 9 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 Sour is River Jo int WRD MREFPP Rural Projects 3 2 , 6 7 5 , 0 0 0S W C 1 9 7 4 - R A 1 9 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 Sour is River Jo int WRD MREFPP Rural Acquisitions 3 , 2 2 5 , 0 0 0S B 2 1 2 2 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 7 / 1 0 / 1 9 US Anny Corps of Engineers Development of Comprehensive Plan for Souris Basin 7 5 , 0 0 0

S W C 2 1 2 8 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 8 / 8 / 1 9 City of Minot Minot 2019 Bank Stab i l i za t ion SWIF Act ion E 8 2 3 , 1 8 0

S W C 2 1 2 9 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 8 / 8 / 1 9 Burlegh County WRD Sibley Island Rood Control Project 9 6 , 4 2 0

S W C 2 7 4 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 9 / 1 6 / 1 9 City of Neche Neche Levee Certification Project 3 6 , 6 0 0O B U G A T E D 2 0 1 9 - 2 0 2 1 9 5 , 1 4 1 , 7 5 4

W AT E R C O N V E YA N C E O B U G AT E D T H I S B I E N N I U MS W C 5 6 8 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 8 / 8 / 1 9 S o u t h e a s t C a s s W R D Sheyenne River Snag & Clear 2 9 4 , 0 0 0

S W C 1 0 9 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 S o u t h e a s t C a s s W R D Cass County Drain No. 40 Improvement Project 1 9 2 , 6 0 0

S W C 1 2 1 7 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 1 0 / 1 0 / 1 9 Tri-County WRD Drain No. 6 7 3 8 , 9 0 0

S W C 1 6 3 8 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 1 0 / 3 0 / 1 9 Rush R iver WRD Auka Ring Dike 2 4 , 3 7 4S W C 1 6 9 4 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 8 / 8 / 1 9 Pembina County WRD Tongue River Snag and Clear 9 8 , 3 3 7

S W C 1 8 6 8 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 8 / 8 / 1 9 S o u t h e a s t C a s s W R D Wild Rice River Snag and Clear 1 2 0 , 0 0 0

S W C 2 0 9 5 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 9 / 1 6 / 1 9 Barnes County WRD 2019 Sheyenne River Snag & Qear Reach 1 - Project 2 4 9 , 7 5 0

S W C 2 1 3 8 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 1 2 / 6 / 1 9 Pembina County WRD Drain No. 82 1 , 0 11 , 6 6 6

O B U G A T E D 2 0 1 9 - 2 0 2 1 2 , 5 2 9 , 6 2 7

S U B T O T A L O B U G A T E D T H I S B I E N N I U M 9 7 , 6 7 1 , 3 8 1

B A L A N C E O F S . B , 2 0 2 0 B U C K E T $ 3 2 , 8 2 8 , 6 1 9

C O M P L E T E D F L O O D C O N T R O L - F U N D S T U R N E D B A C K

C O M P L E T E D W AT E R C O N V E YA N C E - F U N D S T U R N E D B A C K

T O T A L F U N D S T U R N E D B A C K 0

B A L A N C E P R O J E C T S U M M A R Y W O R K S H E E T

V A R I A N C E

$ 3 2 , 8 2 8 , 6 1 9

0

12

S T A T E W A T E R C O M M I S S I O NP R O J E C T S U M M A R Y2 0 1 9 - 2 0 2 1 B l e n n l u m

G E N E R A L P R O J E C T S B U C K E T D e c e m b e r - 1 9B a l a n c e

B U C K E T T O T A L S . B . 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 0 2 1 $ 27 ,093 ,776

O B U G A T E D T H I S B I E N N I U Us w c A O C / R R C 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 R e d R i v e r B a s i n C o m m i s s i o n R e d R i v e r B a s i n C o m m i s s t o n C o n t r a c t o r 200 ,000s w c A O a A S S 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 A s s i n i b o i n e R i v e r B a s i n I n i t i a t i v e A R B I ' s O u t r e a c h E f f o r t s 100,000s w c 2 0 4 1 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 U S G S Stream Gage Joint Funding Agreement 8 1 , 1 4 9s w c 6 2 0 1 9 7 6 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 w e a t h e r M o d i fi c a t i o n I n c . Atmospheric Resource Operations and Research Grants 875,722s w c F U 6 R 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 Fugro Aerial Imagery Project 790,000S E A O C W E F 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 7 / 2 3 / 1 9 N O W a t e r E d u c a t i o n F o u n d a t i o n NO Water Magazine 26,000s w c 9 8 9 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 6 / 1 9 / 1 9 U S G S Stream Gage Joint Funding Agreement 11 0 , 0 0 0S E 1 2 7 3 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 1 1 / 2 6 / 1 9 City of Oakes J a m e s R i v e r B a n k S t a b i l i z a t i o n 16,869S W C 1 3 8 9 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 8 / 8 / 1 9 B a n k o f N D BND AgPace Program 150 ,000S E 1 4 3 1 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 1 0 / 1 7 / 1 9 USGS/LaMoure County Rapid Deployment Gages Under FEMA Hazard Mitigation Grant Program 5 0 0

S W C 1 8 5 9 7 6 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 8 / 8 / 1 9 ND Dept of Environmental QuaGty N F S P o l l u t i o n 200 ,000S W C 1 9 8 6 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 8 / 1 5 / 1 9 ND Dept of Agriculture W I d i i f e S e r v i c e s 125 ,000

S E 2 0 9 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 8 / 2 / 1 9 I n t e m a t i o n a l W a t e r I n s t i t u t e River Watch Program 5 3 , 8 4 0

S W C H B 1 2 0 2 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 8 / 8 / 1 9 Various Consulting Rims Sovereign Land NavigabSity Determination 400 ,000S E A O O I R A 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 6 / 2 8 / 1 9 ND Irrigation Association Water Irrigation Funding 5 0 , 0 0 0S E P S / W R D / D E V 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 7 / 1 / 1 9 D e v t e L a k e B a s i n J o i n t W R B Board Manager 6 0 , 0 0 0S E P S / W R D / M R J 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 9 - 2 1 5 / 2 / 1 9 M i s s o u r i R i v e r J o i n t W R B MRRIC Terry Reck 4 5 , 0 0 0

O B U G A T E D 2 0 1 9 - 2 0 2 1 3 ,284,080

B A L A N C E O F S . B . 2 0 2 0 B U C K E T $ 23,868,243

C O M P L E T E D G E N E R A L P R O J E C T S - F U N D S D E O B L I G AT E DS E 1 2 7 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 - 1 7 1 2 / 2 9 / 1 5 City of Wilton WIton Pond Dredging Recreation Project 35,707S E 6 6 7 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 9 / 5 / 1 9 Burke County WRD Northgate Dam 2 Emergency Action Plan 5 3 0

S E 1 3 0 3 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 - 1 5 4 / 1 7 / 1 5 Sargent Co WRD Gwinner Dam Improvement FeasibSity Study Program 19,681S E 1 8 5 9 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 - 1 9 8 / 8 / 1 9 ND Dept of Environmental Quality N P S P o l l u t i o n 6 2 9

TOTAL FUNDS DE OBUGATED 5 6 , 5 4 7

B A L A N C E P R O J E C T S U M M A R Y W O R K S H E E T S 23,866,243

VA R I A N C E 0

13

Mike Berg, PE – Apex Engineering Group

Matt Oedekoven, PE – DGR Engineering

February 13, 2020

Southwest Pipeline Project Transfer of Ownership – Revised ScopeNorth Dakota State Water Commission Subcommittee

APPENDIX B

Prior Committee Meetings

▪December 20th

• Discussion of Objectives

• Request to Develop a Purpose Statement and Tasks to Meet the Objectives

▪ January 16th

• Review of the Purpose Statement and Tasks

• Request to Summarize the Tasks in the Original Request for Proposals (RFP ) and the Work Scope

Phase 1

▪ Findings

• SWPP ownership can be transferred in a way that is equitable and does not negatively impact water rates.

• Capital financing models that achieve this are identified.

Phase 1

▪ Findings

• The existing SWPP capital repayment model was initially a

net benefit to SWPP water users. It is becoming a net benefit to the State.

• The proposed funding models used by the other large systems can be equitably applied to the SWPP.

Phase 2 Project Scope

▪Purpose Statement

▪ To expand the financial modeling of the Capital Repayment Methods to include all four Regional Water Systems in ND.

▪ To assist the State Water Commission in developing an equitable funding model for regional potable water projects.

Task 2

▪ Financial Modeling – Alternatives

• Representative Theoretical Regional Water System

• Definition of Models

• Determine Cash Flow Requirements

• Discuss Advantages / Disadvantages of each model

Task 2

▪ Financial Modeling – Alternatives

• Existing SWPP Capital Repayment Model

• Termed Debt Payments with 25% and 35% Cost Share

• Hybrid Model (Existing SWPP model until payments reach cost share)

• Utility Basis

• Indexed Rate to AWWA Region 3 Benchmark (e.g. Return on Assets)

Task 3

▪Comparison of Financial Modeling Alternatives

• Application of each alternative to the four existing large regional water systems

Collect information from each of the 4 Regional Systems

Determine and compare the annual capital cash flow requirements

Discuss other financial impacts for each system if they were to follow a different model

Task 4

▪Discussion of Funding Practices

• Review Existing Funding Practices

• Similarities/differences to alternatives in Task 2

• Prioritization of Projects

•Other Funding Options

Ownership issues and impacts

Access to Federal grant participation

Task 5

▪30%, 60%, and 90% Work Sessions with the Subcommittee

• Present progress on tasks

•Make necessary course corrections

• Collect input from regional systems and commissioners

▪Biweekly Updates to the Lt. Governor’s Office

Task 6

▪Report

• Draft Report/Commission Presentation

• 30 Day comment period

• Final Report

Schedule

▪

Milestones Completion Date

Execute Engineering Agreement February, 2020

30% Review meeting with Subcommittee March, 2020

60% Review meeting with Subcommittee July, 2020

90% Review meeting with Subcommittee September, 2020

Deliver Draft report to Subcommittee October, 2020

Presentation of Draft report to SWC October, 2020

30 Day Comment Period November, 2020

Deliver Final Report to Commission Staff December, 2020

Discussion

▪Questions/comments

Documents

February 13, 2020 - North Dakota€¦ · February 13, 2020 Page 3 of 25 It was moved by Commissioner Pedersen and seconded by Commissioner Goehring that under the provision of NDCC