Upload
dangnhu
View
216
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
US Companies Doing Business in Canada
Time for a Reality Check
Bottomed out for now?
Technical analysis along with fundamentals– part 2
this issue
US Companies P.4 Reality Check P.7
Bottomed Out P.12 Technical analysis P.18
Canadians Resident Abroad
ISSUE 4: July/Aug 2012
Featured Articles
US Companies in Canada
Canada is a critical market for US com-
panies with the US selling three times
more goods to Canada than to China.
Because of the proximity and size of
the market, many US companies look
to Canada when expanding interna-
tionally.
Read more: page 4
Reality Check
Ever since we had the financial and
housing meltdown in the US in
2007/2008, we have lived on pins and
needles wondering whether we are on
a precipice teetering on the edge of
financial oblivion. One thing that the
previous whitewash taught us is that
there are very few asset classes, re-
gions or sectors,
Read more: page 7
2
Canadians Resident Abroad July/Aug 2012
Contents
Join our Facebook
group
Publisher: Dax Sukhraj Editor: Dax Sukhraj
Editorial Board: Pervez Patel Arun Nagratha
Dax Sukhraj
CRA Magazine is Canada’s first e-magazine designed specifically for Canadians who are presently
living abroad, who have done so in the past or who are contemplating an out-of-country sojourn in
the future.
Our magazine is distributed electronically free of charge to subscribers in 142 countries around the
world. In addition to sound and timely advice in the investment and tax arenas, CRA e-magazine
covers everything from offshore employment, vacation/travel and international real estate informa-
tion to country profiles, medical/insurance and education options for your children.
3
Canadians Resident Abroad July/Aug 2012
First Word
Welcome to the July/Aug 2012 edition of CRA Magazine.
In this issue, our residency experts, Arun Nagratha and Todd Trowbridge, write about US companies doing business in
Canada. With Canada being a critical market for US companies, the writers provide an overview of key corporate and
individual tax considerations for US companies doing business in Canada. This article will help thousands of Canadians
working for US companies in various tax matters.
In Pervez H. Patel’s article this month, our international financial consultant discusses why it is illogical to hold conven-
tional asset allocation positions that are out of sync with what is happening in the real world. The Western world has been
living for far too long on borrowed money to finance a lifestyle/entitlement system that is simply unaffordable. Are we
on the edge of a financial precipice all over again? Please read on to find the answer to this intriguing question.
In this edition, we are publishing an article from one of the leading Canadian portfolio managers which includes an in-
depth analysis about the current market conditions including the corrections we have seen since April 2012.
Abu Nizam continues his technical analysis article and shows some commonly used chart patterns for investment consid-
erations. As always, charts should always be used along with fundamentals.
We sincerely hope that you enjoy this issue. Should you wish to contact us please send an e-mail to
[email protected]. As always, your questions and comments are welcome.
Dax Sukhraj
Publisher Cover page photo credit: Afroza Sarwar
4
US Companies Doing Business in
Canada
Todd C. Trowbridge, CA
Arun (Ernie) Nagratha, CA, CPA
By: Todd C. Trowbridge & Arun Nagratha. Contact: 60 Columbia Way Suite 900, Markham, ON, Canada, L3R 0C9. Tel: 905.709.7911. Fax: 905.946.2207.
E-mail: [email protected]. Web: www.cramagazine.com. Page: 4
Canada is a critical market for US companies with
the US selling three times more goods to Canada
than to China. Because of the proximity and size of
the market, many US companies look to Canada
when expanding internationally.
However, companies doing business in Canada have
both corporate tax and employee personal tax withhold-
ing and reporting considerations. This article provides
an overview of key corporate and individual tax consid-
erations for US companies doing business in Canada.
Corporate Tax Withholding and Reporting Obligations
If a US company has employees performing services in
Canada, it may be seen to be carrying on business in
Canada. This result does not require a physical plant or
office location, but can occur simply by soliciting orders
or offering services for sale through an agent or em-
ployee. If a Company is deemed to be carrying on busi-
ness in Canada, there will be corporate tax reporting re-
quirements and potentially Canadian taxation. Where
filing requirements are not met, significant penalties may
result even where no tax is owed to Canada. Registra-
tion, collection and reporting requirements may also be
necessary in many circumstances for Canadian Goods
and Services Tax (GST) and Harmonized Sales Tax
(HST).
A US company rendering services in Canada is subject
to a 15% tax withholding on their invoices under Regula-
tion 105 of The Income Tax Act (and an additional 9%
under Quebec tax law if services are rendered in Que-
bec). The Canadian customer is required to withhold
and remit the tax to the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA)
as well as file Form T4A-NR to report this tax withhold-
ing. The withholding is not a final tax but rather a tax
instalment against a potential tax liability in Canada.
Under the Canada-US Tax Treaty, a US corporation car-
rying on business in Canada is only subject to taxation
on income earned in Canada through a fixed place of
business or permanent establishment (PE in Canada).
Even if a US Company providing services in Canada
doest not have a factual PE, the Fifth Protocol of the
Canada-US tax treaty expands the definition of PE to
provide the possibility of a “deemed” permanent estab-
lishment in Canada. A deemed PE would occur in a
case where services are provided in Canada for an ag-
gregate of 183 days or more in any twelve-month period
beginning or ending in the year with respect to the same
or connected project for customers who are either resi-
dents of Canada or who maintain a permanent establish-
ment in Canada and the services are provided in respect
of that permanent establishment.
5
US Companies Doing Business in
Canada
By: Todd C. Trowbridge & Arun Nagratha. Contact: 60 Columbia Way Suite 900, Markham, ON, Canada, L3R 0C9. Tel: 905.709.7911. Fax: 905.946.2207.
E-mail: [email protected]. Web: www.cramagazine.com. Page: 5
If it is determined that the US company does not have a
factual or deemed PE in Canada, it can file a treaty
based exemption with its Canadian corporate tax return
in order to obtain a refund of the tax withheld on its in-
voices. Further, where a US company will not have a
PE in Canada in respect of their services, it may be pos-
sible to obtain a Regulation 105 waiver (in respect of the
15% tax withholding) in advance of providing their ser-
vices in Canada in order to eliminate the cash flow im-
pact of this tax withholding.
Individual Tax Withholding and Reporting Obligations
A US company will have payroll withholding and report-
ing obligations for both Canadian resident and non-
resident employees, in relation to employment exercised
in Canada, even if it does not have a deemed or actual
PE in Canada. There is potential for significant penalties
and interest charges if the company is not compliant with
the tax withholding requirements.
However, if applied and approved by the Canada Reve-
nue Agency in advance, a Regulation 102 waiver may
be obtained for employees resident in the US that will
ultimately be exempt from Canadian tax under the Can-
ada-US tax treaty. This waiver would eliminate the need
to withhold and remit payroll taxes in respect of their em-
ployment in Canada.
A Regulation 102 waiver can only be obtained if the Ca-
nadian source remuneration is less than $10,000 or the
employee is present in Canada in any 12 month period
beginning or ending in the fiscal year for less than 183
days and the remuneration is not paid by or on behalf of
a person who is a resident of Canada and is not borne
by a PE in Canada. In order to qualify for a Regulation
102 waiver, the non-resident Corporation must first ob-
tain a Regulation 105 waiver to prove it does not have a
PE in Canada.
Where a waiver is not obtainable because the compen-
sation is borne by a PE in Canada or the employee does
not otherwise meet the criteria for a waiver, the US com-
pany will be required to meet the payroll tax withholding
requirements. Also, the employee will have a tax liabil-
ity in Canada and will have a Canadian personal tax re-
turn filing requirement where tax is owing, a return is re-
quested by CRA, or if they wish to claim a refund of
overpaid taxes.
6
US Companies Doing Business in
Canada
By: Todd C. Trowbridge & Arun Nagratha. Contact: 60 Columbia Way Suite 900, Markham, ON, Canada, L3R 0C9. Tel: 905.709.7911. Fax: 905.946.2207.
E-mail: [email protected]. Web: www.cramagazine.com. Page: 6
Where a waiver is obtainable although not requested,
but the company does not have a PE in Canada, and the
employee otherwise meets the criteria for a waiver, the
company will still be required to meet the payroll tax
withholding requirements. In order to re-claim the taxes
that have been withheld, the employee must file a Cana-
dian tax return. This brings about other complexities in
terms of who will fund the Canadian tax withholdings and
the mechanics of reclaiming this refund if it is determined
that the employee will not have an actual tax liability in
Canada, especially where they have been subject to full
payroll withholding in the US.
The company is required to report Canadian source
earnings and tax withholdings, if applicable, on Form T4
on an annual basis. Even if a Regulation 102 waiver is
granted and no taxes have been withheld, T4 reporting
is still required. Employees would need to apply for ei-
ther an Individual Tax Number or a Social Insurance
Number. There are potential penalties and interest for
failure to file the annual T4 summary and distribute Form
T4.
Canadian social security requirements (Canada Pension
Plan and Employment Insurance) would need to be re-
viewed. If the criteria are met for exemption from Can-
ada Pension Plan contributions for an employee, a Cer-
tificate of Coverage would need to be applied for with the
IRS. The Employment Insurance rules would need to be
reviewed to determine if the employee and Company are
exempt from contributions.
Canada does have a Voluntary Disclosure Program
(VDP) that allows for the relief from penalties and inter-
est for both corporations and individuals that have been
non-compliant in the past. If the voluntary disclosure is
accepted, the taxpayer is still required to pay the taxes
owing plus interest. However, penalties would be
waived if the VDP criteria are met and the Canada
Revenue Agency accepts the VDP.
This article is meant to provide a brief summary of the
withholding and reporting requirements in Canada for
US companies doing business in Canada. A thorough
analysis should be done by companies either contem-
plating doing business in Canada or already doing busi-
ness in Canada.
Arun (Ernie) Nagratha is a partner of Trowbridge Professional Corpo-
ration, Chartered Accountants | Tax Advisors, and specializes in tax
for Canadian expatriates that live abroad. The firm focuses on inter-
national tax services for Canadians and Americans around the world
as well as domestic personal and corporate taxation. For further infor-
mation on their firm and the services they provide, you can contact
him at the details below.
7
Time for a Reality Check of the Global
Conundrum
Pervez H. Patel, ACA, AICWA, CIM, FCSI
By: Pervez Patel. Contact: 60 Columbia Way Suite 900, Markham, ON, Canada, L3R 0C9. Tel: 905.709.7911. Fax: 905.946.2207.
E-mail: [email protected]. Web: www.cramagazine.com. Page: 7
Ever since we had the financial and housing melt-
down in the US in 2007/2008, we have lived on pins
and needles wondering whether we are on a preci-
pice teetering on the edge of financial oblivion.
One thing that the previous whitewash taught us is that
there are very few asset classes, regions or sectors, out
there that were immune – virtually all equity markets
around the world reverberated to what was happening
on American soil, and theories of the emerging markets
being delinked from the Western world were consigned
to the dustbin of history. Quite literally there was one
market that stood firm in 2008 – Venezuela – and with all
candour, I would suggest that you would not want to in-
vest with the likes of Chavez and Co. Even corporate
bonds and other variations of fixed income / yield were
not immune from the scourge. Of course, one can only
empathize for the bond holders of Lehmann Brothers, at
the time the fourth largest investment bank in the US
who were left with 18 cents on the dollar. Thankfully fi-
nancial institutions North of the 49th parallel were not
quite as narcissistic in their behaviour and held their
ground reasonably well, all things considered.
What has really changed in the last three and a half
years that has us celebrating and making pronounce-
ments that what happened not too long ago was a mere
aberration. Financial advisors and money managers
have suggested a reversion to the mean was inevitable
and have gone back to conventional asset allocations –
in particular the index groupies have once again sug-
gested that passive investing through exchange traded
funds at miniscule fees was the universal panacea for all
the world’s investing woes. It is interesting that every
time in this new millennium we have had bouts of market
euphoria, little heed is paid to the fact that several times
in history markets have decimated portfolios and retire-
ment plans in a way that no one could have foreseen.
With the fixed income world also becoming a desert of
value – how else would you describe getting near zero
yields on two year sovereign debt deposits in US / UK /
Germany and Japan – “safe” fixed income alternatives
offer little recourse. So even if we figure out what ails the
world today, figuring out what could keep principal intact
and yield predictable if nominal outcomes, is entirely an-
other matter.
8
Time for a Reality Check of the Global
Conundrum
By: Pervez Patel. Contact: 60 Columbia Way Suite 900, Markham, ON, Canada, L3R 0C9. Tel: 905.709.7911. Fax: 905.946.2207.
E-mail: [email protected]. Web: www.cramagazine.com. Page: 8
I had the opportunity of interacting with Krish (Nandu)
Narayanan (the manager of the Trident Global Opportu-
nities fund) in the month of May, and what he observed
had some interesting similarities to what I had gleaned at
a PIMCO conference in mid April. For those of you who
did not read my last published report, PIMCO is the larg-
est fixed income house in the world with approximately
US$ 1.7 trillion under management. A large part of my
current diatribe alludes to market intelligence that I
picked up at these two excellent conferences that I had
the pleasure and distinction of attending. As an advisor
who likes to stay abreast of latest developments, when I
hear two corroborating views from houses which I trust,
it kind of reinforces their thesis on what is likely to hap-
pen. To be fair, we live in quite interesting times, and it
would be churlish for anyone to suggest that we can
state anything about the world economy with exactitude.
Source: Bloomberg, International Monetary Fund (IMF) and Organization for
Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) websites
What is fairly clear is that we have muddled on in the last
few years post 2008 and seen fairly anemic growth in
most parts of the world - even this very weak-kneed
growth has been due to the financial steroids that gov-
ernments and central banks have forced to inject into the
system. Take away the steroids and we could be staring
into an abyss very soon. Think about this for a moment,
we have fully extended ourselves on monetary policy
with interest rates near zero, and the job growth recov-
ery in the US is still the weakest in post war history and
the fiscal deficit still runs at about the 8% of GDP. A host
of economic figures published in the first week of July
are just wretched.
In most developed nations, we are also quite extended
in terms of debt levels, and so from a fiscal standpoint
we are reaching quite literally a breaking point in terms
of how much more money can be printed to sustain flag-
ging economies.
9
Time for a Reality Check of the Global
Conundrum
By: Pervez Patel. Contact: 60 Columbia Way Suite 900, Markham, ON, Canada, L3R 0C9. Tel: 905.709.7911. Fax: 905.946.2207.
E-mail: [email protected]. Web: www.cramagazine.com. Page: 9
Please recognize that the table above relates to public
debt. If we were to add private and public debt, the fig-
ures get even scarier: witness the UK where the total of
public and private debt is 950% of GDP – which makes it
quite literally worse than Greece!!!
We are in fact rapidly coming to the point where the abil-
ity of some nations to repay debt is questionable – the
lack of measures to usher in austerity in these nations is
emblematic of their unwillingness to repay debt. While
the Keynesians are suggesting a continuation in printing
more and more money at cheaper and cheaper rates – if
history is any indicator, we are only creating more asset
bubbles, and may I add with all due humility the flow of
capital is clearly sub-optimal as the government (aka the
taxpayer) keeps rewarding the inefficient with more and
more dollops of money. This is the very anti-thesis of
capitalism as we know it as it means society at large
pays the price for those who are incompetent, inefficient
and potentially corrupt.
Most central banks have reacted to this new normal by
ushering in an era of what Bill Gross of PIMCO refers to
as an era of financial repression. This is evidenced by
interest rates close to zero that has absolutely deci-
mated risk-free yields for the retirement community, and
has effectively thrown a monkey wrench into the working
of the insurance and pension industry. Equally there has
been a wholesale fudging of economic data – whether it
be inflation (through hegemonic adjustments), unem-
ployment data (through not counting of people who have
dropped off the rolls in looking for jobs or by counting the
partially employed as full employed) or growth rate as-
sumptions that are dressed up to make incumbent office
holders look good. To be cynical, Western governments
have placed retirees on a sacrificial altar to secure fi-
nancing at artificially low rates of interest to fund their
excesses and those of their major financial houses.
In the last few days and weeks, we have had more evi-
dence of bankers behaving badly all over again. US
banks were once again the subject of focus when they
were obliged to provide their so-called living wills that the
government would use to efficiently wind down these
huge entities. Studies at the MIT Sloan School of Man-
agement by Simon Johnson / John Parsons, recently
brought out this nugget of information about one of the
largest banks in the US. JP Morgan Chase revealed that
$ 50 billion could hypothetically bring down the bank.
Recently this bank indicated that it had lost a figure lar-
ger than $ 3 billion during a period of relative economic
calm through incompetence and negligence on part of its
London trading office. JP Morgan’s total balance sheet is
valued under US accounting standards at about US$ 2.3
trillion. However US rules allow a more generous netting
of derivatives (offsetting netting effect of derivatives that
caused the relatively “minor trading loss”) than European
banks are allowed. JP Morgan’s balance sheet using the
European method expands to $ 4 trillion, making it the
largest bank in the world. Is there a realistic chance of
JP Morgan losing more than $ 50 billion on assets of $ 4
trillion – most of which is in complex derivatives – in the
event of another black swan event like a Euro area
breakup. This would create the biggest financial crisis in
world history – and would make what took place in 2008
look like a picnic.
10
Time for a Reality Check of the Global
Conundrum
By: Pervez Patel. Contact: 60 Columbia Way Suite 900, Markham, ON, Canada, L3R 0C9. Tel: 905.709.7911. Fax: 905.946.2207.
E-mail: [email protected]. Web: www.cramagazine.com. Page: 10
Of course, just in the last week we had another reminder
courtesy of Barclays that the London Interbank Offered
Rate or LIBOR had been systematically manipulated by
colluding banks in one of the most massive frauds on the
investment community at large. The U.K. Serious Fraud
Office opened a criminal probe into the attempted rigging
of interest rates that led to a record fine against Barclays
Plc (BARC), adding to pressure on banks already under
investigation by regulators around the globe.
Recently the world famous economist Nouriel Roubini
remarked on this last banking debacle that it was unreal-
istic to expect anything better as long as banks had in-
centives to cheat or do things that were illegal or im-
moral. In his mind, the only way to improve the situation
was to break up these financial supermarkets where at
present there were no Chinese walls separating invest-
ment banking / commercial banking / asset manage-
ment / brokerages – to avoid conflicts of interest where
you currently have banks acting on both sides of deals.
Evidence Goldman Sachs holding out as defence that it
could take profits as a principal in the same deal in
which a party for whom it was acting as an agent ended
up losing capital. If in 2008, we believed that banks were
too big to fail, they are now even bigger with JP Morgan
taking over Washington Mutual and the carcass of Bear
Stearns, and with Bank of America taking over Merrill
Lynch and Countrywide Credit.
Nandu sums it up nicely by stating that the West has a
crippled financial system that has significant issues of
capital adequacy stemming from the following:
1. Subprime debt losses from 2007/2008 that are not
recognized
2. Falling home prices signifying future mortgage impair-
ment
3. Huge real estate inventories on bank balance sheets
that are still not marked to market valuations
4. Potential sovereign debt losses in Europe and else-
where
We may not be far wrong in concluding that we have all
the ingredients in place for a perfect economic ty-
phoon. Indeed we may have a confluence of simultane-
ous global train-wrecks in Europe (with the potential of a
Greek exit from the Eurozone),
11
Time for a Reality Check of the Global
Conundrum
By: Pervez Patel. Contact: 60 Columbia Way Suite 900, Markham, ON, Canada, L3R 0C9. Tel: 905.709.7911. Fax: 905.946.2207.
E-mail: [email protected]. Web: www.cramagazine.com. Page: 11
in the US (with a stall speed recovery that limps into a
double dip given with each new round of quantitative
easing – QE - resulting in diminishing returns), in China
(where the stakes are more in favour of a hard landing
than ever before), in most of the other BRIC nations (hit
by the Eurozone recessions as well as a breakdown of
reforms needed to get these nations moving on domestic
consumption) and finally the potential for conflict in the
Middle East, as an increasingly belligerent Iran thumbs it
nose at US and Israel. The last would inevitably cause
oil prices to spiral out of control that would hasten reces-
sion in most of the Western world.
What is quite worrisome is that we may have run out of
both fiscal and monetary elixirs to resolve this impending
crisis. In 2008, we had interest rates that could move
down from 5 to 6% to near zero – how could interest
rates now go any lower; we had the potential of fiscal
stimuli by way of quantitative easing that is now becom-
ing less and less effective; we had the ability to rescue
and backstop banks – with governments now grappling
with their own insolvencies, the scope for running on fi-
nancial steroids is now effectively diminished. Equally
there is no political appetite for financial austerity as any
move to cut entitlement programs is greeted with indig-
nation.
I will sign off on this rather dour note – my honest effort
has been to represent the state of the global conundrum
with realism without trying to obfuscate the truth. In my
next missive, I will investigate investment alternatives
that I believe will lend themselves well to this new world.
Good tidings and have a wonderful summer with your
loved ones wherever in the world you may be.
The author is an International Financial Planner with Canadian Invest-
ment Consultants. He helps Canadians around the world with financial,
retirement and estate planning and with investments and insurance.
Canadian Investment Consultants is a division of Keybase Financial
Group, with offices across Canada.
12
Bottomed out for now?
Jurrien Timmer
Courtesy: Fidelity Investments
By: Jurrien Timmer. Contact: 60 Columbia Way Suite 900, Markham, ON, Canada, L3R 0C9. Tel: 905.709.7911. Fax: 905.946.2207.
E-mail: [email protected]. Web: www.cramagazine.com. Page: 12
The stage may be set for government help and a
short-term rally, but problems persist.
It has been quite a few months for stocks. The S&P
500 Index topped out on April 2 at an intra-day high
of 1,422. Then, on June 4, it fell to 1,267 on an intra
-day basis. That’s a correction of 10.9% in the span
of only two months.
In the grand scheme of things, 11% is not a huge de-
cline. We have had many corrections of this magnitude
throughout the decades, and most (but not all) of them
turned out OK. But this one somehow feels worse. Per-
haps it was the speed and persistence of the decline. As
of last Friday (June 1), the Dow had fallen 17 of the past
23 days. Crude oil was even more dramatic, falling 20 of
the past 23 days.
Or perhaps it is the fact that while the S&P 500 fell a
“mere” 11%, many other markets have fared much
worse: the MSCI All Country World Index (ACWI) has
fallen 14% since March, as has the MSCI Europe Index,
and the MSCI Emerging Markets Index has fallen 19%.
Copper has declined 19% since March, and crude oil
has declined 26%, from a high of $111 in March to $82
today. The U.S. has definitely been the best house in a
bad neighbourhood.
We all know the reasons, of course, and they are plenti-
ful: Greece, Spain, China and now even the U.S.
Unresolved issues in Greece and Spain
First of all, there is the ever-spreading eurozone crisis. It
wasn’t bad enough that Greek voters voiced their anti-
austerity anger by electing a variety of so many fringe
parties that it has necessitated a second election (to be
held on June 17), but now the crisis has squarely spread
to Spain. Unlike Greece, which has a solvency problem
at the sovereign level, Spain has a banking crisis. Like
the U.S., Spain went through a property bubble, which is
only now unravelling, leaving its banks exposed, with too
many bad loans and too little capital. The problem is that
the Spanish government doesn’t have the money to re-
capitalize its banks, which means that it has to borrow.
However, there is little appetite for Spanish debt these
days, as evidenced by the fact that Spain’s 10-year yield
has risen to 6.37%, and its spread against German
bonds (bunds) has widened to over 500 basis points.
13
Bottomed out for now?
By: Jurrien Timmer. Contact: 60 Columbia Way Suite 900, Markham, ON, Canada, L3R 0C9. Tel: 905.709.7911. Fax: 905.946.2207.
E-mail: [email protected]. Web: www.cramagazine.com. Page: 13
Spain is stuck between a rock and a hard place. Prime
Minister Mariano Rajoy wants the “troika” (the EU, IMF
and ECB) to bail out Spain’s banks directly, as opposed
to doing so indirectly through a bailout of the Spanish
sovereign (with the funds then being disbursed to the
banks). Why is this important? The thinking goes that if
Spain accepts bailout money at the sovereign level, it
would have to agree to the same kinds of austerity con-
ditions that caused Greek politicians to get voted out of
office. So if the Rajoy administration can get the troika to
bail out the banks directly, it can presumably avoid a
similar fate. The problem is that the troika’s bailout fund
(the European Financial Stability Fund, or EFSF) is not
allowed to bail out banks directly, only governments (as
it did with Greece). Plus, Germany wants to make sure
that there is a stick to go along with the carrot.
It looks to me as though Spain is playing a game of
chicken with Germany to see if it can let the markets get
close enough to the abyss to force Angela Merkel to
blink first and approve a direct bank recapitalization by
the EFSF, or by the soon-to-be-established European
Stability Mechanism (ESM). We’ll see how this all plays
out, but for now the markets remain on edge, waiting for
some sort of policy response from Germany or the Euro-
pean Central Bank.
14
Bottomed out for now?
By: Jurrien Timmer. Contact: 60 Columbia Way Suite 900, Markham, ON, Canada, L3R 0C9. Tel: 905.709.7911. Fax: 905.946.2207.
E-mail: [email protected]. Web: www.cramagazine.com. Page: 14
What would a Merkel blink look like? Perhaps Germany
will agree to have the upcoming ESM (expected to
launch on July 9) lend directly to the banks, or for the
ESM to borrow from the ECB so that it can “lever up”
and gain more firepower. Or perhaps Germany could
agree to provide funding for Spain, but with fewer strings
(e.g., austerity conditions) attached. Or perhaps Ger-
many is willing to back-stop a eurozone-wide bank de-
posit guarantee, which is what the U.S. has with the
FDIC.
Any or all of these developments could certainly have a
positive impact, which would be magnified if the ECB
stepped back into the fray with bold action, such as cut-
ting its policy rate (currently at 1%), conducting another
long-term refinancing operation (LTRO) or even buying
sovereign debt outright, like the Fed’s quantitative eas-
ing (QE).
But so far, none of this is happening, and it is hard to
see the troika or even the ECB taking bold action before
the June 17 Greek elections and the French Parliamen-
tary election, or the June 28 and 29 Euro Summit. They
may want to keep their powder dry should the worst-
case scenario of a Greek exit come to pass. The good
news is that there is now a dialogue taking place be-
tween Germany and Spain about a potential bailout, and
we are starting to hear more talk about a banking union
(including deposit guarantees). So that is a step in the
right direction.
Serious slowdown in China
The problems are not just in Europe, of course. We now
have a serious slowdown going on in China that has had
a real impact on Asian stock markets and currencies, as
well as on most commodities.
The question is, what can and will the Chinese govern-
ment do about this? Many investors are assuming that
the central government will simply pull some levers and
stimulate the economy, as it did in 2009, when China
underwent a massive infrastructure spending boom that
benefited the global economy. A repeat of such a boom
is unlikely, in my opinion, because the last one produced
not only a lot of inflation but also a property bubble, as
well as an increase in non-performing loans in the bank-
ing sector.
That doesn’t mean, of course, that China will just sit idly
by. There are still some levers that it can pull. One of
them is to get more aggressive in cutting the reserve re-
quirement ratio (RRR) for banks. This is the amount of
funds that banks have to set aside when they make
loans. The higher the ratio, the less there is available to
lend, and vice versa. So far, the People’s Bank of China
has lowered the RRR only a few times, and the rate is
still very high, at 20%. So there is a lot more that can be
done. In fact, China just lowered rates this week, by 25
basis points.
15
Bottomed out for now?
By: Jurrien Timmer. Contact: 60 Columbia Way Suite 900, Markham, ON, Canada, L3R 0C9. Tel: 905.709.7911. Fax: 905.946.2207.
E-mail: [email protected]. Web: www.cramagazine.com. Page: 15
The question is what impact any of these measures will
have over the long term. China underwent a massive
lending boom for many years, but that appears to be
coming to an end. Both loan growth and money supply
growth are barely moving (see the chart below). Further-
more, capital is leaving the country, as illustrated by a
decline in the renminbi. The result is that banks are hav-
ing trouble growing their loan books, because they can’t
attract the necessary deposits.
Perhaps China has reached the point where it is starting
to push on a string in terms of monetary policy. Perhaps
it has reached the law of large numbers, where its $7
trillion economy has gotten so large that incremental
stimulus becomes less and less effective. I am skeptical
that China has the kind of silver bullet in terms of a pol-
icy response that saved the day back in 2009. Neverthe-
less, it will likely do something, and lowering the RRR
more aggressively appears to be the easiest option. If
this happens, the markets are likely to respond favoura-
bly.
Will the Fed act?
While the U.S. economy still appears to be in a sus-
tained economic expansion, there is no doubt that the
pace of economic growth has slowed markedly in recent
weeks.
16
Bottomed out for now?
By: Jurrien Timmer. Contact: 60 Columbia Way Suite 900, Markham, ON, Canada, L3R 0C9. Tel: 905.709.7911. Fax: 905.946.2207.
E-mail: [email protected]. Web: www.cramagazine.com. Page: 16
We are now in a global slowdown, coupled with a debt
crisis in Europe and a potential hard landing in China.
And I haven’t even mentioned the fiscal cliff, which, ac-
cording to the Congressional Budget Office, would cause
a recession in the U.S. if it came to pass. When it rains,
it certainly pours.
This has the potential to bring the Federal Reserve (the
Fed), which meets on June 20, back into the game with
another policy response. Fed chair Ben Bernanke can’t
be too pleased to see the dollar rally as sharply as it has,
to see the payroll numbers come in as soft as they have
and to see the stock market correct so sharply in the
span of just a few weeks.
So perhaps the Fed is ready to act. But what can it do?
Certainly the markets would be thrilled if the Fed were to
embark on another traditional large-scale asset program,
more commonly known as QE. Certainly the gold bugs
would. Or perhaps it will announce an extension of Op-
eration Twist (which would entail selling more short-
dated securities in exchange for long-dated Treasury
bonds and mortgages).
My guess is that the Fed is not there yet. I think the bar
is pretty high for it to take such dramatic action, espe-
cially in an election year. Besides, what will either action
accomplish over the long term? It is questionable
whether the Fed's previous large-scale asset purchases
provided much more than a temporary sugar high, and
after all, Treasury yields are already at historic lows, with
the 10-year yield dropping to 1.43% on May 30.
Besides, there’s a reason rates are so low, and that is
that collateral is becoming scarcer and investors are run-
ning out of so-called risk-free assets. This is why inves-
tors have been hoarding Treasuries, German bunds and
Japanese government bonds in recent months (and, as
of last week, even gold).
The whole purpose of QE1 and QE2 was linked to the so
-called Portfolio Channel Theory, which holds that when
the Fed steps in as an artificial buyer of risk-free assets
(i.e., Treasuries), investors will then sell these safe as-
sets to the Fed and be forced to go out along the risk
curve to buy risky assets like corporate bonds and equi-
ties. But in the current climate, one really has to wonder
if the Fed can make this Portfolio Channel Theory work.
After all, if Treasuries are the ultimate safe haven, will
investors easily part with them, even at inflated prices?
Recent market behaviour suggests they won’t.
What’s next?
So what will actually happen? I can only guess, of
course. My sense is that things are getting bad enough
to once again force the hand of policy makers in Europe,
China and even the U.S. But what can central bankers
and policy makers do quickly in order to satisfy impatient
investors looking for instant gratification? Most of the
measures in Europe, for instance, will take time to be
agreed upon, let alone implemented.
17
Bottomed out for now?
By: Jurrien Timmer. Contact: 60 Columbia Way Suite 900, Markham, ON, Canada, L3R 0C9. Tel: 905.709.7911. Fax: 905.946.2207.
E-mail: [email protected]. Web: www.cramagazine.com. Page: 17
There is still one piece of low-hanging fruit out there on
the monetary policy front: a central bank liquidity swap,
highlighted in a recent report by Aitken Advisors. This is
a facility that the world’s largest central banks use to bor-
row and lend funds to each other. Currently, the rate at
which other central banks can borrow dollars from the
Fed is 50 basis points (bps) – half of one percent – for
up to three months. You may remember that the Fed, in
conjunction with five other central banks, lowered the
dollar swap rate from 100 bps to 50 bps last fall in order
to mitigate last summer’s liquidity squeeze (this liquidity
injection was shortly thereafter reinforced by the ECB’s
two LTROs).
With the dollar soaring and liquidity once again drying
up, it is quite plausible that the Fed and its fellow central
banks will resort to another coordinated move to lower
the dollar swap rate (maybe to zero this time) and per-
haps even extend the term (perhaps to 12 months). The
advantage of a coordinated cut in the swap line
(combined with a maturity extension) is that it can be
done quickly, and it would be relatively uncontroversial.
In other words, for the Fed, this course of action might
relieve the liquidity squeeze, please the markets and do
so without bringing with it the kind of political baggage
that a QE3 would. As I said, it is low-hanging fruit, and it
could have an immediate impact on market sentiment,
even if it does little to structurally improve the health of
the world’s financial system.
Short-term market response
The global equity markets have been in a sharp decline
since March, but things have now gotten bad enough
that some sort of policy response seems likely. In fact, it
is happening already, with several dovish speeches by
Fed governors, a rate cut in China and more positive
statements coming from Merkel about a unified Europe.
Combined with oversold technicals, this seems to set the
stage for a short-term counter-trend rally in risk assets,
including stocks, currencies, commodities and credit, but
our longer-term view hasn’t changed. The structural
problems facing Europe and the global economy are
likely to persist for some time (and perhaps even get
worse). My sense is that the market has bottomed for
now and that we are due for a temporary reprieve. I re-
main considerably cautious over the longer term.
Jurrien Timmer, Director of Global Macro and Portfolio Co-Manager of Fidelity
Tactical Strategies Fund– June 8, 2012
Before investing, consider the funds’ investment objectives, risks, charges, and
expenses. Contact Fidelity for a prospectus or, if available, a summary prospectus
containing this information. Read it carefully.
The information presented above reflects the opinions of Jurrien Timmer, Director
of Global Macro and Portfolio Co-Manager of Fidelity Tactical Fund, as of June 8,
2012. These opinions do not necessarily represent the views of Fidelity or any other
person in the Fidelity organization, and are subject to change at any time based on
market or other conditions. Fidelity disclaims any responsibility to update such
views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because invest-
ment decisions for a Fidelity fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied
on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Fidelity fund.
Views expressed regarding a particular company, security, industry or market sec-
tor are the views of that individual at the time expressed and do not necessarily
represent the views of Fidelity or any other person in the Fidelity organization.
These views may not be relied upon as investment advice, nor are they an indica-
tion of trading intent for any Fidelity Fund. These views are subject to change at
any time based upon markets and other conditions, and Fidelity disclaims any re-
sponsibility to update such views.
18
Using Technical Analysis along with
Fundamentals– part 2
Abu Nizam, CIM
By: Abu Nizam. Contact: 60 Columbia Way Suite 900, Markham, ON, Canada, L3R 0C9. Tel: 905.709.7911. Fax: 905.946.2207.
E-mail: [email protected]. Web: www.cramagazine.com. Page: 18
In my May/June 2012 article I talked about some com-
monly used technical analysis and how we should con-
sider some of them along with fundamentals in our in-
vestment decisions.
A few years earlier Kevin Matras from Zacks Investment
Research, a US based equity research company, pro-
duced a guide book about common chart patterns. The
guide book can be found in this link. Today’s article is
almost entirely based from this guide book and I will
briefly touch a few of the patterns most commonly seen
and easy to understand.
As always, I do more fundamental analysis than techni-
cal analysis, but it’s better to understand some of the
chart patterns so you can more precisely choose a point
of entry and exit.
“Fundamentals of course are ultimately the
key in determining the price or value of a
stock. And statistics have shown that compa-
nies receiving upward earnings estimate revi-
sions outperform the market while companies
receiving downward earnings estimate revi-
sions underperform the market. But technical
analysis (and specifically chart pattern analy-
sis) can give you insight as to when the market
is ready to react to those fundamentals.”-
Kevin Matras
19
Using Technical Analysis along with
Fundamentals– part 2
By: Abu Nizam. Contact: 60 Columbia Way Suite 900, Markham, ON, Canada, L3R 0C9. Tel: 905.709.7911. Fax: 905.946.2207.
E-mail: [email protected]. Web: www.cramagazine.com. Page: 19
Symmetrical Triangle in an Uptrend (Bullish):
When most of the known information is already factored
in and there is a prevailing bullish outlook, market partici-
pants will be looking for new information. While they are
searching for new information the markets can go
through a pause. In an uptrend, a pause like this can
create symmetrical triangles. This signals it’s likely that
the markets will continue to move upward once new in-
formation is available (example on your right and below).
Symmetrical Triangle in a downtrend (Bearish):
Symmetrical Triangles in downtrends will typically break-
out to the downside (example on your right).
20
Using Technical Analysis along with
Fundamentals– part 2
By: Abu Nizam. Contact: 60 Columbia Way Suite 900, Markham, ON, Canada, L3R 0C9. Tel: 905.709.7911. Fax: 905.946.2207.
E-mail: [email protected]. Web: www.cramagazine.com. Page: 20
Bull and Bear Flags:
This is a very similar concept but the chart looks more
like a flag than triangle. The following is what Kevin said
about flags:
“The consolidation part of the pattern usually
represents only a brief pause in an otherwise
powerful market. They are typically seen right
after a big, quick move – either up or down.
The market then usually takes off again in the
same direction. Research has shown that Flags
and Pennants are some of the most reliable
chart patterns to trade. And they can be found
in some of the most explosive price moves.”
21
Using Technical Analysis along with
Fundamentals– part 2
By: Abu Nizam. Contact: 60 Columbia Way Suite 900, Markham, ON, Canada, L3R 0C9. Tel: 905.709.7911. Fax: 905.946.2207.
E-mail: [email protected]. Web: www.cramagazine.com. Page: 21
Head and Shoulders:
The Head and Shoulders pattern is one of the most com-
mon patterns and shows a reliable signal in an uptrend.
This pattern usually forms at the top of an uptrend and
signals a reversal of the trend. The reason it is called
head and shoulders is because if you look carefully you
will vaguely find a silhouette of a person’s head and
shoulders.
(example on next page)
22
Using Technical Analysis along with
Fundamentals– part 2
By: Abu Nizam. Contact: 60 Columbia Way Suite 900, Markham, ON, Canada, L3R 0C9. Tel: 905.709.7911. Fax: 905.946.2207.
E-mail: [email protected]. Web: www.cramagazine.com. Page: 22
23
Using Technical Analysis along with
Fundamentals– part 2
By: Abu Nizam. Contact: 60 Columbia Way Suite 900, Markham, ON, Canada, L3R 0C9. Tel: 905.709.7911. Fax: 905.946.2207.
E-mail: [email protected]. Web: www.cramagazine.com. Page: 23
Conclusion: Because of space constraints I have to stop
here. Unfortunately, there is lots of homework to do be-
fore starting to use these patterns. Kevin has demon-
strated how to identify different points and how to con-
nect them so that investors can properly construct a pat-
tern and develop a better signal. Each pattern can give
misleading or confusing signals and in some cases can
work in a completely different way than expected. For
this reason, readers should also learn how to spot failed
breaks and stop-out points to manage misleading pat-
terns.
All the charts are taken from stockcharts.com.
24
E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.cramagazine.com
60 Columbia Way, Suite 900, Markham, ON, Canada, Tel: 905.709.7911 Fax: 905.946.2207
Canadians Resident Abroad Inc. is part of the Keybase Financial Group Inc.
CRA magazine is published bi-monthly by Canadians Resident Abroad Inc. All rights reserved. No
part of this publication or any part of it may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or
transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or
otherwise for commercial purposes, without the permission of Canadians Residents Abroad Inc.
Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the contents of the magazine. All articles
represent the opinions of the authors. Canadians Resident Abroad Inc. makes no warranty, ex-
press or implied, concerning the content of this publication.
Creative Director: Abu Nizam Creative Assistant: Mike Beaudoin
Circulation: Jerome Pare & Lindsay Penner Web Site Manager: Keith Sutherland