Slide 1

FDA recommendation: people should consume less than 65 grams of fat per day. Theory of Consumer Behavior Goal of Consumers: maximize utility well-being or satisfaction Consumers problem: Choose diet to maximize utility subject to the budget constraint of 65 fat grams (ignore other costs) Utility maximization requires (prove later): Marginal utilitythe utility from an additional Latte In this example, the price equals the number of grams of fat.

Slide 2

additional pleasure per gram must be the same for everything we eat, i.e, foods that contain twice the amount of fat must give us twice the amount of pleasure. In October, a portion of the sales of Pink Ribbon Bagels (with dried cherries and cranberries) go to benefit breast cancer charities. Pink RibbonBlueberry Versus 7 grams2 grams Do I enjoy pink ribbons more than 3 times as much as blueberries currently? NO. Hence, Im not maximizing my utility by eating pink ribbons every morning.. Only the Cinnamon Crunch has more fat (8 grams)!

Slide 3

Law of Diminishing Marginal Utilityas more and more blueberry bagels are consumed, the marginal utility of eating blueberry bagels must eventually fall. Law of Diminishing Marginal Utilityas fewer pink ribbon bagels are consumed, the marginal utility of eating pink ribbon bagels rises. works in both direction Hence, Ill probably have a pink ribbon bagel occasionally but not every morning.

Slide 4

On July 1 st 2008, the New York Board of Health required chain restaurants to put calories on menu boards. Grande Chocolate Chip Frappucino = = 580 Calories 6 Chicken & Bacon Ranch Sub = 580 Calories = Models assume consumers act as if > < or =

Slide 5

Slide 6

Russ sets aside $420 (Y) for tutoring (T) and fitness training (F) each year. P T =$14 per hour P F =$21 per hour Horizontal intercept:

Slide 7

Fitness Training (hours per year) Tutoring (hours per year)

Slide 8

Russs budget constraint shows his consumption options between fitness training and tutoring given his income (Y) and their prices (P F and P T ). How do we show Russs preferences? Russs indifference curves show all the combinations of fitness training and tutoring that yield the same level of utility or well-being, i.e. Russ is indifferent between all the combinations along a given indifference curve.

Slide 9

Fitness Training (hours per year) Tutoring (hours per year) Indifference curve Slope = MRS = MU T /MU F Indifference curves are negatively-sloped and usually convex to the origin due to diminishing marginal utility.

Slide 10

Fitness Training (hours per year) Tutoring (hours per year)

Slide 11

Fitness Training (hours per year) Tutoring (hours per year) A B E F What combination should Russ choose to maximize his utility?

Slide 12

Fitness Training (hours per year) Tutoring (hours per year) A B E F Point F is on a high indifference curve but Russ cannot afford that combination, so we should ignore that combination.

Slide 13

Fitness Training (hours per year) Tutoring (hours per year) A B E Points A, B, and E are on the budget constraint. Which maximizes Russs utility? Point E, where the indifference curve is just tangent to the budget constraint.

Slide 14

Fitness Training (hours per year) Tutoring (hours per year) A B E At point E, MRS = slope of the budget constraint = P T /P F. At point A, |MRS| > P T /P F, which implies that MU T /P T > MU F /P F. Russ should increase tutoring ( MU T ) and decrease fitness training ( MU F ) by moving down his budget constraint to point E. At point B, |MRS| < P T /P F, which implies that MU T /P T < MU F /P F. Russ should decrease tutoring (MU T ) and increase fitness training ( MU F ) by moving up his budget constraint to point E.

Slide 15

Suppose Harvard subsidies tutoring, but makes it unlimited P T =$7 per hour P F =$21 per hour Horizontal intercept:

Slide 16

Fitness Training (hours per year) Tutoring (hours per year)

Slide 17

Effect of Price Change Substitution effect: the lower price of tutoring makes causes Russ to substitute tutoring for fitness training to make MU T /P T once again equal to MU F /P F. Income effect: the lower price of tutoring increases Russs real income so he can afford to purchase more both goods.

Slide 18

Fitness Training (hours per year) Tutoring (hours per year) A B S Substitution effect Income effect Substitution effect Income effect

Slide 19

Suppose Harvard subsidies but only the first 10 hours

Slide 20

Physical Training (hours per semester ) Tutoring (hours per semester )

Slide 21

Physical Training (hours per semester ) Tutoring (hours per semester )